Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

What is it with England’s middle order?

A lot of people at my internship were at an event in the afternoon, so I clocked off early, and watched the last 30 minutes at the pub. It beat compulsively checking cricinfo and imagining the match based on their (excellent) commentary.

I make no apology for jumping on the Mitchell Johnson is awesome bandwagon earlier this year. I know he’s bowled poorly today, but the sharp difference between batters and bowlers is that bowling is more dependent on being a class act. Even between the nonsense, he bowled two crackers to get rid of Cook and Prior. The one to Prior is not a ball you can learn, or really practice. It requires the perfect combination of a low arm, arm speed, and wrist position. So I would still say persevere with Johnson, because he will get the best players out more than say, Stuart Broad. I was really impressed by Hilfenhaus today, who I knew little about before this summer, but who bowled really well today, and the ball to get Flintoff out was a bit of a stunner. Make no mistake, this is a good Australian pace attack, and with Lee to come back, they are to be underestimated at our peril.

What is it with England’s middle order? Having flair players at 3 and 4 probably doesn’t help that much. For that reason, I’d like to see Pieterson at 5 for a change. Keep the howls down for a second, I have a theory. Test cricket is played at such a cracking pace these days that number five isn’t as pressed for time as much as he was before. I think Pieterson finds it confusing to play second fiddle to a man already batting well, so why not let him marshal the lowish order, and have license to dominate. He’s not young, he won’t change his game just because the papers ask him to. To get the best out of him and England’s middle order play him at five.

Strauss of course batted rather nicely today, although it probably helped being assisted to 30+ by copious long hops and half volleys from Johnson (the same goes for Cook, although I’m glad he asserted himself finally). Strauss plays almost exclusively with a horizontal or vertical blade; not for him the diagonal slashes of Pieterson or Hughes. On a pitch offering exaggerated movement and a big slope (see Hilfenhaus today) that sort of technique will fare well. I’m waiting with nervous anticipation to see what Hughes will make of the slope, although he did score about a million runs for Middlesex early this year at Lords.

Big day tomorrow. England need to step up and really stamp themselves on the game in the first session. If Broad ever picked a time for a maiden hundred in Tests, this will do nicely…

Check out our other content

Most Popular Articles