Sprawling, overcrowded, dirty and disease-ridden, the
 monolithic complex of Sao Paulo’s House of Detention, a.k.a.
 ‘Carandiru’, once Latin America’s largest
 correctional facility, gained infamy for the military
 police’s frenzied massacre of 112 prisoners in 1992.  Adapted from prison doctor Drauzio Varella’s book:
 Carandiru Station, the film attempts to consolidate the
 doctor’s fragmented narrative. It chronicles his experiences
 in endeavouring to combat the H.I.V. epidemic prevalent amongst
 the ignorant, often promiscuous, drugabusing inmates, leading up
 to the day of the massacre. From the outset, a dilapidated
 building – dark, dingy and dangerous – mirrors the
 standard of care for the agglomerated, forgotten Brazilian
 criminal underclass. The film proceeds like a cleverly
 constructed puzzle of narratives as the doctor gains trust
 amongst the inmates employing good-humoured South American
 pragmatism and innate skills of good listening, patience and
 chat. Twentysix prisoners reveal tales, often comical and always
 highly entertaining; many storylines resembling Mexican
 soap-opera plots (watch out for the lovable transvestite
 ‘Lady Di’ and the chauvinist juggling two women), yet
 betray an underlying sense of sadness and personal tragedy.  Director Hector Babenco’s sophisticated technique mirrors
 Robert Altman’s Short Cuts, alternating between the
 ‘outside world’ and the omnipresent prison, allowing a
 brief glimpse into moments of personal failure. There is a sense
 of foreboding as these highly unique and individual characters
 plummet, concluding their tales in the lost fortress of
 Carandiru. Babenco’s ambitious project culminates in the
 massacre; the two hours and 26 minutes seem overdrawn, with so
 many stories that the final massacre is somewhat of an
 anti-climax, even though the visual violence is shocking. This
 could have been a shallow Love Actually style intermingling of
 meaningless stories; fortunately it succeeds in creating an
 affinity between the audience and the ‘celebrities’ of
 Carandiru, highlighting the indignity of their deaths. Political
 and social criticisms remain implicit in the actions of this film
 due to the lack of an overt worded condemnation of the Brazilian
 prison system.  Babenco incorporates all sensationalism into a realm of
 humanism and compassion. Above the violence and social injustice
 rises a battle to survive and maintain a remnant of integrity. A
 fictional, quasi-docudrama, prison life seems merely an extension
 of a squalid, shanty town existence. The film’s success lies
 in revealing the prison as a Brazilian social metaphor and a
 microcosm of Brazilian emotional stealth, humour and solidarity
 in the face of corruption and injustice.ARCHIVE: 3rd week TT 2004 

