Monday 30th June 2025
Blog Page 1036

One thing I’d change about Oxford… Coffee shops

2

Oxford, wake up! We are a town under occupation by coffee shops in the same order of magnitude as actual ‘coffee shops’ in Amsterdam, or trap houses in the favelas of Rio.

As each day passes, the sandstone colleges’ reign over the cityscape is further eff aced by the sterile gleam of these mass-marketed menaces, pushing upon us a substance as dangerous to the sleep-deprived student as Jack Daniels to an alcoholic.

Being able to function only after hitting your local ‘dealer’ isn’t as cute and cosmopolitan as we imagine. None of us are tux-wearing George Clooneys in the Nespresso advert, sipping a beverage to pass idle hours. We are red-eyed wretches, stumbling to Exam Schools while clasping a scalding Nero cup to our bosom. We are the fools at the front of the Pret queue, looting the depths of our bag for the pound coin that stands between us and our fifth filter coffee of the day.

Caffè Nero exerts the same control over our lives as its eponymous mascot. (Emperor) Nero, along with his cronies, Paul, Starbucks, Costa, Pret and Taylors have colonised the highstreet, subduing us with this modern-day opiate of the masses, disguised in all its delightful forms and flavours.

Aged 20, did you really think you’d already undergo Sunday withdrawal? Each Sabbath you enter that terrifying purgatory between the hours of eight and 12, a world made bleak without 200 mg of the good stuff coursing through your veins.

Face it, Oxford has become a blazing inferno of capitalism and caffeine and the only thing that can save us is the second coming of Christ.

Leicester fever hits Pembroke

2

As thousands across the country celebrated Leicester’s unlikely win of the Premier League, four Oxford students forfeited their bop to head to Leicester at midnight and join in the celebrations.

The students at Pembroke College decided to make the trip up to the East Midlands after learning that the underdogs had won the title, despite having started the season with 5000-1 odds of lifting the Premier League trophy.

Their victory was announced after Tottenham Hotspurs failed to beat Chelsea, awarding Leicester their first league title win in 132 years.

At least a thousand fans gathered at King Power stadium to watch the Spurs Chelsea game, with many more descending on the streets of Leicester after the result.

After Pembroke’s annual sports dinner, the quartet suggested joining the thousand strong crowds celebrating in Leicester and by midnight they were in a taxi on their way to the city.

They arrived at Jamie Vardy’s House only 15 minutes after Vardy’s party had come to end, instead having to settle with a selfie taken by his front door.

After trips to King Power Stadium, a nightclub and Leicester Cathedral to visit Richard III, the students returned to Pembroke at 8:15 the next morning, with one even heading straight to lectures upon his return.

None of the students is a Leicester fan, but they have all been following the club’s title bid from November.

Jack Harrison, one of the second year students who made the trip, commented, “One of the best decisions I’ve ever made. I’ve never experienced human joy to the extent I did in the club in Leicester.

“Sports runs the continuum of existence and our second year will always be synonymous with Leicester’s bid for the title. We have followed right from start and we have been on such a journey with Leicester we wanted to follow it through to the end.

“We backed Vardy early doors, ever since their 3-0 win over Newcastle. I thought that they would probably win the title once Spurs drew with Liverpool.”

Pembroke undergraduate Nathan Wragg told Cherwell, “It was one of the best nights of my life. It really was a once in a lifetime opportunity and I am so happy we made the spontaneous decision to go. It is a trip I will not be forgetting any time soon.”

The Oxford students also met with another group of boys, none of which were life-long Leicester City fans prior to this season, but had made the trip down to Leicester from Leeds University.

They featured on BBC news for their endeavours the next morning, still out and going strong at 7am the next morning.

Review: Green’s Café

Oxford boasts some outstanding sandwich shops. Take Taylors for example: ever-present in Oxford and always there for you whether you’re craving a simple BLT or something more luxurious like smoked salmon and cream cheese on rye. Oxford without Taylors or Mortons or Jimbob’s is almost unimaginable.

Yet, despite the delicious delights that can be found in these sandwich shops, there is more to discover. I’m lucky (yes, lucky) enough to live at Hugh’s; every walk into and out of town leads to a discovery of a new café in Jericho, or a patisserie on the edge of Walton Street. Having walked past Green’s Café on St Giles’ nearly every day for two years, this week I finally ventured inside.

Downstairs is small, but this is something I’ve come to expect from the built-up streets of Oxford, and it isn’t a major setback. The display of sandwiches, however, is most definitely not small. There’s something to please everyone, meaning that the lunchtime decision is not for the faint-hearted. The sandwiches come in all shapes and sizes; yes, there are those which are made on two slices of bread, but there are also baguettes, paninis, bagels and breadless options (… salads), all hot or cold, on multiseed, organic white, ciabatta, rustic, wholegrain and even white onion seed bread.

After a prolonged period of decision-making I chose a Goat’s Cheese Baguette; spinach, olives, pesto and roast peppers on multiseed bread, and it was delicious. Other tempting options included the Chorizo and Halloumi Baguette and the Buffalo Mozzarella Ciabatta. The menu also displayed fresh-to-order jacket potatoes and an all-day breakfast, including muesli, pancakes and a cooked breakfast too – no option was a bad one.

The decor, on the other hand, does leave a bit to be desired. There’s a large seating area on the first floor, but the tables are randomly placed around and it’s not particularly light; perhaps it only seems this way as it’s surrounded by some of the most beautiful architecture in the country. Nevertheless, it’s clean, acceptable and inoffensive.

Ultimately, the food itself should principally define a café, and Green’s Café serves fresh, interesting and most importantly very tasty sandwiches. Break out of the monotonous mould of standard sandwich shops. Walk a few extra minutes up St Giles’ – you won’t be disappointed.

Living life in transition

None of us lives here. Well, that’s incorrect- because we all do. Either we rent our rooms in college, delighting in living next to our best buddies and suffering through sharing a kitchen with this nasty ‘person’ from upstairs that never does their dishes – or we live in a place somewhere in Cowley or Jericho, we pay our own bills, and hold the carefully cultivated aura of real grown-ups.

We move out of those places every eight or nine weeks, though. It’s barely six months if you count the time we spend here per each year – bit of a meagre number to consider a city ‘your living place’. And yet, despite so short a time here, we’ve learnt our little paths and winding ways through the city centre, the crowd-avoiding second-floor cafés, the sunlit reading desks in old libraries. For every short period of time we’re here, we pass through the city, and we sieve through its tangled mesh, leaving little traces behind – like that time when you dripped shaving foam after trashing; that other time when you cried on the way to the lecture and didn’t want anybody to notice; that time when you glided out of the punt into the river, and you left a wet trail all the way to the college. By this point, we’ve literally soaked into Oxford; I guess we do live here.

But we don’t, not really.

Aside from those rare few who were born here, an overwhelming majority of us needed to arrive first, as wide-eyed freshers excited about gowns and formals. By now we’ve gone and come back at least several times. And whereas it’s somehow disquieting to think about it, we cannot forget the fact that very soon, we will be preparing to leave for good.

Whether you are a fresher or a finalist, this is Trinity. Students in sub-fusc roam the streets, and with them comes the nagging thought at the back of your mind: this will soon be me. Three, four, even five years is a lot of time, but somehow it ends up being awfully short. The academic year is ending, and suddenly you realise that everything here – punting and garden parties, little cafés and libraries, and terrible white-soaked creatures in party hearts emerging from the river, this little shining universe of traditions and people you’ve come to know and love – is ending, and you’ll leave. Even though you’ve just come here.

Tempus fugit, aeternitas manet. A maxim on my clock: time flies, eternity awaits. Doing Italian, I’ve just enough grasp on Latin to know when it can be used for a dramatically melancholic purpose.

I’m a foreigner, a Pole. Therefore, I came here with even less knowledge of the place than an average Brit – a fresher so wide-eyed it’s a miracle my eyeballs didn’t fall out. The first months were filled with adventure and discoveries, some of them pleasant, the other less so: the discovery that the English would smile
to you on the street rivalled the discovery of the fact that most of them didn’t really mean it.

The joy of friendship was followed by a terrible culture shock re- garding human relationships – after all, this is very much culturally
determined. Falling ungodly ill in the middle of the winter semester was definitely a downside; an upside was discovering how deeply the welfare people cared for a student in need. The first year was harrowing yet rewarding; maddeningly confusing, but, after all that time, I left England in June with a calm, satisfied feeling of having at least roughly figured it out.

Culture shock has something of a Stockholm’s syndrome in it; it cuts through you and rips you out of your own mind, and you no longer understand yourself, or trust your confidence, and even your entire personality is shattered because there is no longer a way to express your- self in a language so very foreign and wrong. My experience is extreme, as I came from a country not even remotely like England, having never spoken the casual language. But this city is so strange that each and every single one of us has to go through this difficult experience of trying to fit in. And yet we grow to love it as we heal, and when we are finally forced to part ways, we hurt again. If that is not Stockholm’s syndrome, then maybe we’re just masochists; because even though this city has hurt me on arrival, and then at many other occasions, it is still not a place I want to leave. Perhaps this is partly because there is going to be another new place, and another culture shock, and it doesn’t really ever stop.

We don’t live here, none of us do. We’re just passing through it, always in transition: slipping our way through the Prelims, Mods, collections, Finals, classes, rooms and roommates, moving in and out for the term, going away, coming back, saying hello, waving goodbye, passing friends on Cornmarket, leaving with them for a party, running past, running through, running from, running towards, ever-ongoing, because the life of Oxford is the life in transition and it never really stops.
Maybe neither should we, then.

But there is some comfort in this thought: remember that time you went back to college after falling into the river from your punt? It’s going to stay in there, that wet trail on the cobblestones. Some things are constant here. It may not be us, but some things are.

The Oxonian Dandy

0

The contemporary dandy must, as has been well established, dress for himself. However, one must bedeck oneself in habit appropriate for occasion and circumstance from time to time. With the truly oceanic array of event and jamboree for attending at this diverse university, there comes the opportunity for a great depth in outfit. A depth in outfit is not synonymous with wardrobe content, however. A man with a few cotton articles and a kingly imagination can create an ensemble tenfold more splendid than a man with 100 silken articles and a lacklustre mind for fashion.

With this in mind, this week let us consider the ways in which the Oxonian squire can gather together the youthful folds of his attention to collate an outfit from his existing wardrobe for the occasion which calls for what many would call ‘smart-casual’. The cornerstone of fashion transcendence is a prudent adaptability in clothes-choice. Once again the dandy can approach the problem presented to him with flair and panache simply by opening his mind to the endless posSibilities at hand. He need not purchase an entire new selection of clothing nor indulge in any fancy couture.

With smart-casual, the combinations are endless. A jacket should always be close at hand, and trousers of the variety jean, corduroy, chino and flannel can all be slipped on. All manner of shirts and shoes can be worn with this outfit category, too. Some gents will even venture to accoutre themselves with a pair of trainers in this modern era of experimentation and progression. Indeed, footwear of a sort more rugged can certainly be a sensible choice: one wouldn’t want to venture to a garden party in a pair of Turkish slippers – the lace might be irreparably smirched.

Often one will find that the most important element of a smart-casual outfit comes with a decent top-layer. A sports-jacket often works well. (It should be noted, here, that the nomenclature for jackets and coats is interchangeable. A friend of mine often as- serts that “only potatoes have jackets.” This is nonsense: many of the most esteemed tailors will refer to these garments as either jackets or coats. Name the item as you please.) If you do have a particular design to purchase a new blazer or sports-jacket, then be bold in colour choice. While a navy or steely blue works well in many smart-casual settings, surely these colours do not match the audacity of a hot colour! One can really make a statement with a mauve or a citrus.

Indeed, one of my fondest fashion memories was while watching Henry V at the Old Vic. I was then myself furnished in finery which would certainly fit the category ‘smart-casual’. I wore a pink blazer with white piping. The stage was set for a royal scene – not for the play itself, of course. All eyes were on me as I sat in the boxes. As the actor playing the king was about to deliver his “once more unto the breach” speech, the lighting changed, and I gleamed, dazzling in the rays, resplendent in my hot pink glamour! Next week, we’ll have a look at nightwear.

Clunch: St Catz

As English students well acquainted with the Oxford English Dictionary, we decided to peruse the OED for what ‘clunch’ really means (leaving aside the definition of its near-homophonic counterpart). Our findings revealed it to be a “lump; a heavy and unshapely mass”, and when we signed up for this, we didn’t think that such a ‘clunch’ would be what we actually got.

As we were led into the kitchen, we realised it that it isn’t just the architecture of Catz that was brutalist. Passing through the heart of the means of production, we left with our product: a jiggling triangular ‘clunch’ of egg. We’re still not sure what to call what we ate. It seemed ‘nutritional’ though, and some of our fellow undergraduates suggested that it could be referred to as a “pancake”. Stuffed with relatively bland butter beans (yet creamy nonetheless) and juicy sweetcorn, it tasted of little more than the chive garnish.

Our opinions were split on the carrots: were they worthy of the description “aggressively al dente”, or were they undercooked enough to be desirably crunchy? These are the big questions that life at Oxford makes you ask yourself.

We were split on the decor too: Anora was hesitant about offhandedly dismissing the college’s post-modern premises (into which the ‘anti-art’ appearance of the meal fit perfectly). Indeed, she thought that Catz’s hall still didn’t measure up to the architectural elderliness of some other colleges. In contrast, Eli thought the “hanging tapestry things” were “cool”. Either way, although very spacious and comfortable, the hall felt more like a gymnasium, and its poor concrete to glass ratio let in little of the day’s sunny splendour.

The NUS beyond the conference

0

Student campaigns, in Oxford and beyond, are now fighting a political context which attacks those struggling the most. They cannot fight it alone. I approach this referendum first and foremost as a disabilities campaigner, and in this respect it is important to note the crucial work that goes on behind the scenes.

In 2014, the National Union of Students formed a huge chunk of the resistance to proposed Disabled Students’ Allowance cuts. Students could take pride in their campaigning and lobbying of MPs when the changes were subsequently thrown out, and we cannot understate the NUS’s role in providing students and activists alike with information on the proposals, as well as coordinating a nationwide response to a nationwide problem. The problem is, though, that the government is still intent on slashing DSA, and even now the NUS are at the forefront of working against this matter.

Campaigning to remain in the NUS is thus in the interests of so many disabilities campaigners, not to mention activists working on other campaigns. This referendum will place pressure on groups such as OUSU’s Oxford Students’ Disabilities Community – disaffiliation would do this even more so. And as a member of their committee, I think it fair to say that we are already overstretched in providing the services and communities that we do.

The point is that the NUS provides a critical link between the higher and further education institutions across the UK, giving a united voice to students who want change. Our JCRs, MCRs, and OUSU cannot perform a similar role alone. Because Oxford is in the NUS, it can send representatives to the NUS Disabled Students’ Conference, and others like it. It is here that, while students won’t agree with every decision made, we find a common voice and common ground.

The NUS stays connected with Oxford all year around too. I sit on the OUSU Executive in a part-time, unpaid position as Academic Affairs Officer. The work I and others do on this executive committee is greatly enhanced by the resources the NUS has to offer. It was partly through the NUS, for example, that colleges across Oxford could introduce consent workshops in the past few years, and the importance of positively rethinking and reshaping the problems of sexual violence on campus is of great importance to so many of us.

Beyond leading the campaign to stop cuts to the DSA, the NUS has done so much more to help. It is among the most significant national organisations conducting research on the interests of students as a target group. Just one example of this is the new Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Guide, where new research was conducted into improving mental health services across campus. This was picked up by major national newspapers and given as evidence in Parliament, on top of the advice it gave to us campaigners here in Oxford. The NUS will now fund two PhDs for research in the causes and prevention of student suicide. If it sometimes feels like the NUS is a soapbox or a friendship group, hopefully you now realise that this is a problem rooted in misinformation, and one we can fix. It is not an argument to leave it.

Losing our NUS membership would seriously damage the ability of Oxford students to campaign for change. Just this Wednesday, when the referendum was decided, some of us had to rush straight from OUSU Council to deliver a talk with Rethink Mental Illness on responding to our mental health crisis. This is only the beginning; it would be a shame to expend our energies on an NUS referendum when we have degrees to do, campaigns to work on, and ourselves to care for. I can only hope that our situation does not get worse, and that we do not end up without the aid so required from the NUS.

Review: Eye In The Sky – a warning about the costs of war

A thriller led by veteran British actors Helen Mirren and Alan Rickman, along with Breaking Bad’s Aaron Paul and Academy Award nominee Barkhad Abdi, is on paper a recipe for success. And it does succeed, thanks to its powerful performances, remarkable direction from Gavin Hood, and the highest levels of cinematic suspense I’ve seen for a long time. The problem is, I can only really say those things about the film’s final act, which is exceptionally good. So good, in fact, you will probably leave the cinema forgetting how distinctly average much of the film was.

Colonel Katherine Powell (Mirren) is the commander of a mission to capture Al-Shabaab extremists in Kenya, but ultimately changes her plan to killing the targets rather than capturing them when she realises a bombing is imminent. This causes conflict between herself and her legal advisors, her superiors supervising the mission in London (including Rickman’s Lieutenant General Benson), and politicians including the Secretary of State. A conflict ensues comparing the tactical advantages of releasing the missile as proposed, with the potential collateral damage of innocent lives, plus its accompanying negative publicity. The concluding act sees the multiple voices in the operation conflicted as to whether to fire the missile as the situation becomes increasingly difficult.

But for the most part, this is a thriller film without the ‘thrill’. It’s rather an adequately made action-free war film which provides a remarkable insight into an often overlooked aspect of conflict – drone warfare. The conflicting political, military and, ultimately, moral ideologies lead to a tense final act in which the cast’s powerful performances succeed in raising the emotional stakes and suspense, to such a degree that you will forgive much of the movie for its blandness.

It’s commendable to make a war film which prioritises its powerful message about the potential costs of war, rather than mindless action and explosions. The problem is, it would seem that the final act was the initial idea of the film, which resulted in the rest of the film being, more or less, exposition and setting up the final act. Thankfully, the final act is so good that it’s not an issue. Particular praise should be given to the performances of Barkhad Abdi and Alan Rickman. As the latter’s final (live action) film, it’s a performance he no doubt would have been proud of. His frankness and realism as a veteran soldier powerfully present a character who knows too well the cost of war. Helen Mirren is impressive, yet there are other more memorable showcases of her talent, and her performance here seems merely ‘adequate’ by comparison.

Overall Eye in the Sky is an unusual and compelling entry into the thriller and war genres, which goes from ‘good’ to ‘great’ in its final section.

Oxford researchers look into cure for blindness

0

Clinical trials of gene therapy for inherited blindness have shown promising results. Research from the Oxford University, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, has shown promising results for the use of gene therapy in treating choroideremia, a rare form of inherited blindness affecting around 1 in 50,000 people.

Choroideremia is caused by the mutation of a gene inherited from parents. It almost exclusively affects males. The trial involved inserting the correct version of the gene into the patients’ DNA using a virus. The virus, modified to carry and insert the gene in the correct location, was injected into the back of the patients’ eyes. Only one eye was treated for each participant, with the other serving as a comparison.

Although Gene therapy is the subject of much research, difficulty frequently arises from ensuring that the viral vector is delivered to the correct place and ensuring that the new gene is successfully incorporated into the patients’ DNA.

“Optimal design and the viral vector was delivered into the correct place using advanced surgical techniques.”

Robert MacLaran.

The viral vector used was the common adeno-associated virus but according to Professor Robert MacLaran, the lead investigator in the study, the success was down to “optimal design and the viral vector was delivered into the correct place, using advanced surgical techniques”.

The promise of the investigation is largely due to the fact results of the trial were achieved over a three and a half year period. Maclaran, who has a patent for ‘AVV – a vector for use in gene therapy of choroideremia’, has commented that“There have recently been questions about the long term efficacy of gene therapy, but now we have unequivocal proof that the effects following a single injection of viral vector are sustained.” While this trial is far off providing unequivocal proof, it does provide some hope for the future direction of similar trials.

A potential limitation of this trial is that choroideremia is a rare disease with a relatively simple pattern of inheritance. Whether, as reported elsewhere, this offers much hope for treatment of far more complex diseases such as muscular degeneration is uncertain.

Nonetheless, for some of the participants suffering from this disease it has improved their quality of life. According to the Daily Mail, Joe Pepper began to lose his sight in his early teens. After receiving the first injection at the John Radcliffe hospital in Oxford he is reported to have said “For the first time in my memory, I read on and on. I laughed and shed a tear. I will remember that day for the rest of my life.”

Student runs marathon…on a treadmill

0

While many were still lying in bed students to sublet their rooms, Unlease is helping students make back looking forward to May Day, Somerville student Tom Dillon ran 26.2 miles on a treadmill. Beginning at 10am on Saturday 30 April in the Somerville Gym, Tom finished shortly before 2pm, completing his first marathon in under four hours, which is a time widely considered to be the benchmark for a successful first attempt.

Running for more than pride, Tom also raised publicity for Unlease, a peer to peer platform allowing students to sublet their rooms more easily, by tearing up 26 fixed long-
term letting agreements along the 26 miles.

Unlease co-founder Mags Chilaev commented, “Tom Dillon set himself the challenge of completing a marathon in under four hours to highlight the plight of students who are stuck in rigid 12-month contracts and who waste thousands of pounds in rent each year.

“He was unlease-ing, so to speak, his potential in the same way that Unlease Hosts unlease their rooms’ potential by subletting, instead of instead of letting those rooms stand idle each holiday.” Chilaev explained, “As a result of recent changes in legislation which make it a lot easier for thousands in rent which they would otherwise be wasting on an empty room.

“The marathon idea started as we were sat having coffee, and Tom, in his delusional mindset, claimed he could run one easily with no training.”

Jack Cottom, Tom’s friend

“The average student in Oxford wastes about £2,500 in rent each year when their room is empty during non-term time every Christmas, Easter and summer holidays – that’s almost half of the yearly rent. While their rooms are standing empty, there are a tonne of other students in need of medium-term accommodation either because they are visiting Oxford for a research project or simply getting kicked out of their college rooms. Unlease matches up people looking for medium-term accommodation with students who need to sublet and in doing so utilises all that empty accommodation, in a city which has one of the worst housing crises in the country.”

Tom’s friend Jack Cottam told Cherwell how the endeavour came about. “The marathon idea started as we were sat having coffee, and Tom, in his delusional mindset, claimed he could run one easily with no training. The challenge was taken up, and wagers were placed between the two of us. “Cut to two weeks later and the marathon had spread via small talk, to the point where there was no going back. The Facebook event was made and interest was decent.”

Initially, Jack was doubtful about Tom’s chances, “Tom’s previous training had consisted of two runs – the longest being 15 miles, after which he couldn’t walk for a day. So, when the day came, and Tom was eating his athlete’s breakfast of porridge just 20 minutes before the ‘race’ began, I was sceptical. [Bearing in mind I never wanted him to succeed, his lack of stretching beforehand reassured my belief that Tom would injure himself – or worse – after an hour. But Tom’s persistence became clear, and where he lacked in ability he compensated for with financial incentive, and pro-digious peer pressure.]

“The last half hour was intense, as Tom was visibly weakening (so it seemed) and his legs were getting heavier – he had been relatively comfortable before then. But, as the gym started to busy with spectators, the peer-pressure (and financial reward) forced Tom to complete the run.” Jack grudgingly conceded,“Although I lost a fair bit of money I can see he’s done alright. He’s still not an athlete though.”

Tom agreed with Jack’s assessment, “Whilst I think I was more dignified than Paula Radcliffe, he’s probably right that I am far from being an athlete”. Unfortunately after enduring the marathon, Tom was unable to endure to May Day. “I went to the pub after the race and was written off by two pints because I think the blood was pumping so hard – after disgracing myself, I collapsed in bed”. However, the experience hasn’t deterred Tom, as he told Cherwell, “I might do the London Marathon next year, or at least run outside”.