Saturday 7th June 2025
Blog Page 1141

Cherwell’s guide to fantasy football

0

Fantasy Football has descended upon Oxford. On the face of it, any football fan should relish the prospect of picking himself or herself in a fantasy football team, and, despite amounting to about twenty seconds of Wayne Rooney’s pay packet, the top prize of £150 is extremely exciting. If nothing else, as with real fantasy football, this could just prove to be a handy way to procrastinate next time you’re trapped in the Gladstone Link on a sad Thursday night. Regardless of what your motivations are for playing Oxford Fantasy Football, here are a few things to keep in mind in order to maximize your bragging rights next time you’re at the pub with your one or two mates who, like yourself, have nothing much better to do.

Have a ridiculous team name in mind. Cherwell Sport recommends classics like ‘All Souls Campbell’, ‘Corpus/Lineker’ and ‘St Peter Crouch FC’ – names that make an embarrassment of the huge potential for football and Oxford-related chat, but that’s exactly what you want.

One difference to the original Fantasy Premier League is that everyone starts on the same price, meaning some players are much better value than others. On one end of the spectrum, as an amateur footballer at best, I would have scored a remarkable -6 points in my only appearance as a stand-in goalkeeper last year; the eight goals I conceded against Worcester 2nds still haunt me to this day, finding it difficult to keep clean sheets on and off the pitch. Absurdly, I would be the same price as last year’s top goal scorer in the collegiate system, Matt Hill of St Hugh’s, who cuts a very different figure to his ‘real world’ footballing namesake, formerly of Wolves and Sheffield United. Hill’s 42 goals and 23 assists last year would have earned well over 200 points for anyone picking him in their XI and should be the first name on your team sheet this season.

Another particularity that novice game-players may miss is that some players will play far more games than others, allowing more opportunities to score points. Men’s and women’s Blues players can also play for their college team, providing multiple chances to pick up points and a good way of following the progress of the University teams. Pembroke’s Alex Tsaptsinos, who has started the 2015/16 season in especially impressive goal-scoring form for the Blues team, will be keen to avenge his college’s Cuppers Final defeat last season. Players who play in both the JCR leagues and Reserves leagues can also be a significant source of points. Regent’s Park’s Jonny Streatfeild and Julius Lehmann also ply their trade for LMH first team and can rack up a lot of points from more defensive positions. Therefore, those who don’t know the ins and outs of college football may find it difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Finally, a message to the silly fresher who decides to shoot rather than square it to his mate with an open goal in order to score more points for his own fantasy team. Your captain will bench you and the drinks will be on you in the college bar that evening. You have been warned.  

Football Cuppers kicks off

0

This week sees the start of one of Oxford’s greatest sporting traditions: college football. Week in, week out, teams of the good, the bad and the just plain awful slog it out in sodden pitches all over the city. For some, an opportunity for sporting immortality, for others just another way to procrastinate, college football will always retain its central role in University life.

Up in the rarefied air of the JCR Premier Division, traditional powerhouses Worcester and Catz vie once again for the title. The league promises to be as competitive as ever, as newcomers Hugh’s and Lincoln attempt to draw on the momentum of a successful qualifying campaign to establish themselves amongst the elite of men’s college football.

Though Wadham’s survival in the league went down to the wire last season, and was due to a fantastic run of form in the final set of games, new captain Ben Williams is “optimistic” about continuing the 20-year tradition of Wadham being part of the Premier Division despite the loss of key personnel. The influx of freshers, with many eager to sign up, has “unearthed a few gems,” whilst a strong performance in a preseason friendly with Pembroke “gives us a strong platform to build on.” The squad, according to Williams, is “fit, ready and fresh” to face Keble 1sts in the opening game of the season.

The struggle to replace old icons and replace new talent is the toughest thing for Michaelmas football. In Division 1, Exeter captain George Bustin rallies against those “naysayers” who would suggest they are a “team in decline,” though he admits that of the eleven that started the 2014 Cuppers final, only two remain. After finishing last season with one win out of nine, Bustin is looking forward to using the new season to inject some energy into a revamped squad and targets this year as a “break-through season”, with the continued talents of Harry Morgan in midfield.

Division newcomers Pembroke also have a good feeling for this year, with captain Laurence Wroe spurred on by last year’s Cuppers final defeat to aim for a rare double. Promising international talent in Australian Jason Ghaly and Spaniard Karl Frey should go some way to filling the void of the departing Blues winger/full-back Richard Lloyd and the aggressive defensive talents of Jesse Schwimmer. Indeed, Wroe admits that an abundance of University talent, including Blues captain Alex Tsaptsinos and Centaurs captain Joe Fowles, can sometimes be a drawback as ‘burnout’ and a busy schedule increase injuries and fatigue.

Division 2 promises to be just as competitive. Merton/Mansfield and Brasenose are still smarting from last year’s relegation, and with hopefully a newly solidified defence (they shipped 42 goals last season) Brasenose could rapidly be back in Division 1.

Freshly promoted Hilda’s and Peter’s, neck-and-neck throughout last season, look to continue their rivalry and solidify their place.

Traditional Division 2 stalwarts Jesus are looking to “challenge for promotion this year,” according to captain Omar Mohsen, with a team composed of promising freshers and seasoned players. They are expecting a “strong fight for the title” by fellow team in the ascendancy Magdalen, who raised a few eyebrows and not a few yellow cards with their physicality last season. Nick Cooke looks to be an early tip for player of the season, moving in to a more traditional central striker role, having been team top scorer last season marauding opposition defences from the wing.

Though the quality of the football may decrease, the enthusiasm for the game certainly does not. Down in the depths of Division 3, many teams’ best-laid plans and careful tactics disintegrate quickly into an exercise in damage limitation. No one understands this better than Hertford captain Sam Broadey. Though admitting he was “nervous” this year after losing four of his top scorers to graduation and the real world, “We were optimistic after thirty freshers signed up, with eight interested in University trials.”

Such enthusiasm translated itself into a particularly enthusiastic first bop the night before a friendly with Peter’s, which in turn resulted in Broadey giving his second half team talk at 3-1 down over the sound of vomiting players. However, inspired by the freshers rising to the occasion and an opportunistic goal apiece to make it 4-2, Hertford enjoyed a remarkable turnaround. With spectators on the edge of the pitch cheering, by the end of regulation time goals by Broadey and ‘Scottish powerhouse’ Matt Edwards had levelled the scores. With one minute remaining, a scintillating run by centre back Joe Day saw him sweep the ball into the box, where Ossian O’Sullivan slotted him from the penalty spot. Hertford’s remarkable turnaround “couldn’t have been done” without the new players, says captain Broadey, as he heaps praise on the freshers Witt, Esosa, Rabinowitz, Ahmad and Joshi.

Inter-collegiate football is the beating heart of University sporting life. It may not be pretty, it may not be skilful, but there is something very real and vital about freshers, grad students and everybody in between playing together. 

Fast and furious: OUDC darts its way into the new year

0

Swish, flies the arrow of the 2015/16 College darts season – squarely into the triple 20. Riding the beer-swilling wave of excitement of the Trinity 2015 Cuppers tournament, this year’s league sees the return of 22 veteran teams and the arrival of Christ Church into the four divisions.

Hertford I, the team of the moment, will be looking to follow up a slew of successes in Cuppers with a strong start in the top division. The team packs a weighty Blues punch in the form of barman duo Jamie Tong and Jack Shirley, each trailing achievements across all forms of the game from recent years. With a traditionally cohesive team spirit, they pose a serious threat to 2013/2014 champions Wadham I, who have suffered from a series of high-profile graduations in the last two seasons. Despite retaining Blues Captain Scott England and veteran thrower Jonathan Stanhope, they have been consistently pipped in deciding legs by Hertford in recent history. A sizeable and skilled fresher uptake will be essential to their hopes of returning to the top.

Ever present and eternally menacing, Worcester I, despite a distinct dearth of silverware in the recent past, will remain a threat to the top teams. Boasting recent Blue Matt Boughen and a host of returning college stalwarts, they will look both to spoil Hertford’s and Wadham’s parties, and to curb any rise up the ranks from increasingly sharp-looking sides from Linacre and Catz.

The second and third divisions are home to several other college first and second sides, as well as two women’s teams from Wadham and Worcester. Whilst regularity and turnout for these divisions has in the past been patchy, the recent openness of the top league is surely an invitation for sides in the lower leagues to confound the record books.

A stage witnessing some of the most dramatic arrows of last season was the lone division of fours. A contest that saw OULS snatch victory from Mansfield by 71 points to 73 spawned some real danger-players in Trinity cuppers. Librarians by day, wizards of tungsten by night, Matthew Roper and Gavin Robinson led the University Library Services to their league title before occasioning dramatic upsets in the cup, felling Blues favourites in both the singles and pairs formats. It will be with great confidence that they lead the only non-college-affiliated team into flighty battle this term.

Outside the college world, the Blues team also enter this year braced for further drama and success. After victory at the National Championships in 2014, Oxford came into last summer’s tournament with courage and a steely mettle, yet also with an acute awareness of the desirous eyes of the northern universities that met them as they entered the Nottingham Trent SU. Superb consistency saw them chassé through the group stages. In spite of momentary concerns, the team sunk their quarter- and semi-final opponents to reach a second final in as many years.

In what became a pantomime performance, the outed teams, cheering and heckling from the Trent mezzanine, clearly positioned Oxford as the heroes and a bolshie Lancaster side as their villains.

Yet as the game reached its deciding match, in turn its deciding set, and tortuously a deciding leg, there was no happy ending for OUDC, as anchorman and crowd favourite Jonathan Stanhope succumbed in the final throws of the tournament. Incredible scenes, for sure, but a distinctly quiet night in a Nottingham hostel to follow for the team.

Nevertheless, with seven returning Blues from last year’s side, there is an air of renaissance amidst the now-experienced squad and its seasoned supporters; the standard exhibited by the team throughout the travails of Trinity Cuppers speaks volumes, foreshadowing greater triumphs to come in the 2015/16 season.

Whilst the lack of other-than-wrist exercise and preference for lager over Lucozade sees darts much maligned in the sporting world, it is a growing art in Oxford. With more teams than ever before, the leagues offer a great vehicle for visiting new colleges and their bars.

After a failed bid to introduce darts as an Olympic discipline at the Rio and Tokyo games, our sport must wait until at least 2024 for its turn on the biggest of stages, and for its own Olympic stadium.

But with an incipient Cambridge side beginning to appear on the horizon, there is renewed hope of finally securing Blues status for the underdog Varsity fixture. As the sport continues to throw its flights out across the town and see them settle on new teams and arrowsmiths, the cellars of Oxford’s college bars, the floor beneath its oches and the bristle of its double 20s have never looked so under threat.

If you would like to field a college team or express interest in playing for the University side, it is not too late. Please email [email protected] for more information.  

Confessions of a football captain

0

At the end of my first year, I was offered the captaincy of our college second football team. The team had gone all season without losing a game, won the cup and finished with a +47 goal difference.

I certainly didn’t win the captaincy because of my footballing ability; I suspect I got given it because I was punctual, relatively enthusiastic and I had bought the previous captain a few pints in the bar over the year. I didn’t even make the starting eleven in the cup final, instead putting in a stellar performance as linesman. Still, everything was looking good and I could already hear myself describing myself as “captain of a cup-winning football side.” Perfect.

Except, I had forgotten that all of the team’s best players were about to graduate. No bother, we had a few more decent players – we’d be fine, I thought. Except I had forgotten that all of our mediocre players would then get poached by our 1st team, whose ranks had also been thinned by the sands of time. Still, we’d have new freshers, some of whom would probably be good footballers – we’d be fine, I thought.

Fast forward a few months, and I’m stood by the side of the pitch after my first game as captain, wondering how we had managed to lose 8-0. I wasn’t even sure we’d let in that many goals in the entirety of last season. As I had hoped, a big group of freshers had come along but unfortunately after our pathetic first performance most of them didn’t come back. I imagine they decided they had better things to do on a Friday afternoon than watch some smarmy tosser with an infuriatingly good left foot score his fifth goal past our beleaguered keeper to the sound of me shouting, “Come on lads, we’re still in this”.

Fast forward a few more months, and our team is nearing the end of the season having not won a game and disastrously crashed out of the cup 6-0 in the first round. We had managed to score five goals, but had unfortunately conceded 35. We’d have conceded more but we were lucky enough to have a few games cancelled because if there’s even a slight chance of a bit of light drizzle, our groundsman won’t let us play. Arguably the worst part of being captain was trying to make sure everyone got a game – even the shit ones. I’d end up subbing myself off to let someone else attempt the futile task of keeping the goal tally below three. That, or I’d end up playing in goal because no-one else wanted to. “Keep it up boys, we’re playing good football”. We were bollocks. It’s just what people say, isn’t it?

By some miracle, we managed to scrape a 2-1 victory in the last game of the season. By then, though, it was too late. A whole year of guilt-tripping my friends into playing, of negotiating with stubborn groundsmen, of washing the kit because I felt too bad asking freshers to do it, and for what?

We were relegated, we went out in the first round of the cup, and our goal difference was -31. I somehow only spent an average of 45 minutes on the field per game, despite the fact that I was the one picking the team. I was depleted and couldn’t wait to palm it off to an unsuspecting fresher.

Still, would I do it again?

Obviously. 

Review: The Ordinary Boys – The Ordinary Boys

0

 â˜…★★☆☆

 Three Stars

My first impression of The Ordinary Boys had been their sickly (and irritatingly misspelt, which I’m sure is ironic but annoys me anyway) pop love song ‘I Luv You’ released on their 2007 album. Enough to put me off them for a while, I’ve largely ignored their output, until giving them a second chance with their new eponymous album. Expecting bland pop, imagine my surprise when more than decent indie rock reminiscent of late Blink-182 blared out of my speakers.

Even the dubious-sounding ‘Four Letter Word’ isn’t the icky mess the title may suggest, rather beginning with a soundbite from the 1982 coming-of-age drama Fast Times at Ridgemont High and leading into a classy rock song that wouldn’t sound out of place between The Strokes and Red Hot Chili Peppers. Some of the songs lack the rough and ready touch that made 90s rock so irresistible; the edges of ‘Panic Attack’ are too rounded to be believable. The song writing might not be pushing any boundaries or breaking new ground, but it feels familiar and comfortable. It’s a refreshing, if not innovative, break from the seemingly constant need of artists today to be doing something different and individual. Sometimes you want a comfy old sweatshirt rather than a fancy new dress.

 

Live Review: The Japanese House

0

It was a relatively small but eager crowd that gathered in the Bullingdon to watch the opening night of The Japanese House’s 10-date UK tour, which also happened to be the group’s first ever live show. After a handful of hyped singles, a fantastic debut EP, and feteing from all the buzz-building outlets anyone could hope for, the pressure was on to deliver.

There was an air of hushed anticipation as the crowd waited for the set to get underway. A sense of mystery has hung around The Japanese House since their debut single, ‘Still’, appeared online back in March of this year. That ethereal sounding track, with its distorted vocals and haunting, confessional lyrics, felt determinedly enigmatic and anonymous. The fact that their visual identity mostly comprised photographs of desolate seascapes that they took themselves only helped fuel the curiosity. Whose voice was that? What gender were they? Waiting there in the Bullingdon, one half expected to witness a Sia-like stunt, with a reclusive performer taking to the stage shrouded in a veil. Thankfully, that never transpired. It turns out the project is masterminded by Amber Bain, a diminutive, unassuming woman who appeared on stage drowning under an oversized grey cable jumper. According to her friends, who peppered the audience, this show was a nerve-wracking prospect for the singer, though you wouldn’t know it, as she delivered a fascinating 40-minute set that moved around between tracks from her previously released EP, Pools To Bathe In, and an upcoming release.

Beneath a sea of mostly blue and purple lights, she gave a deliberately pared-down but well thought through performance, with the music’s captivating harmonies swelling around her low, husky singing voice. Turning her slightly recessive stage presence into a virtue, she replaced cultivated mystery with the real thing.

 The crowd leaned in as she guided them through the layers of astral melodies that rose and crashed in and out of the music. It was a hypnotic show that enthralled, absorbed and beguiled.

 After a bit of brief chat between songs, and without an encore, she and her band left the stage, but she happily stayed to sign records and pose for photos. It was a charming end to a mesmerising set.

As the crowd dispersed in a zen daze, you got the sense that this was the last time you’d get to see The Japanese House at such an intimate venue.

Kobe Bryant’s swan song

0

ESPN’s annual #NBArank project, which counts down the NBA’s top players for the upcoming season, was released last week. Kobe Bryant, the man who has argu­ably been the face of NBA basketball over the course of the last 16 years, was ranked as the 93rd best player out of a possible 400.

For diehard Bryant and Lakers fans, this was a hard one to swallow. Bryant himself obviously was not happy, claiming that the rankings were “silly” and thus continuing the ongoing animosity between himself and the ESPN reporters whom he called “a bunch of idiots” last year after being ranked 40th. To a degree, he has a point – the rankings are en­tirely based on the opinions of 100 reporters, and have notoriously been controversial ev­ery year. Yet the sad reality is that, as someone who is fast approaching the end of a legend­ary career, Kobe Bryant cannot and should not be viewed as an elite, high-performing basketball player any more.

First of all, in order to be one, you actu­ally have to play on a regular basis. In the last two injury-plagued seasons, Bryant only managed to play in 41 out of a possible 164 games. For someone who’s played almost 20 years of professional basketball, this should perhaps be expected, but it should not be disregarded when estimating what Bryant can actually contribute this year. The same principle ap­plies to stars such as Derrick Rose and Dwayne Wade, who have both also dealt with nagging injuries in recent years, but the dif­ference is that Bryant is now 37, preparing to play what he himself has acknowl­edged to be his swan-song season.

Because of age and injuries, Bryant’s once superhuman abilities have deteriorated. Last season, before going down with a severe shoulder injury, Bryant averaged a respectable 22.3 points per game but shot at a rate of 37.3 per cent, well below the league average. This resulted in him only being in the 30th per­centile in player efficiency. Sure, he’s playing on a really bad team plagued by inexperience, unjustified swagger (Google Nick Young) and hilariously-outdated coaching – anyone who still believes that basketball games can be won without three-point shooting, like head coach Byron Scott, counts as a bad coach and needs to be rescued from the 70s. But this is where Bryant’s own legacy haunts him, as he’s shown that he can dominate games on bad teams before – the man averaged just over 35 points a game on a team that started notori­ous scrubs and consequent folklore heroes Kwame Brown and Smush Parker.

This isn’t to say that he can and should do better, given that he is roughly ten years past his peak, as any 37-year-old basketball player would be. But it is an indication that Bryant just can’t do it anymore, which makes this next season all the more daunting for any fan of the NBA. Regardless of whether you’re an admirer or a hater, Kobe Bryant deserves the respect of being the top-ten player in NBA history that he is, and to watch him score eighteen or so meaningless points per game, whilst being evidently frustrated by the lack of success that has defined his last years in the league, will be disappoint­ing.

Bryant chose to take the 93rd rank­ing as an insult. Per­haps he would be better off seeing it as a wake-up call. 

High Hopes, Falling Leaves

0

Photography: Beckie Rutherford
Model: Nina Foster
Concept and Styling: Emily Pritchard

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12185%%[/mm-hide-text]

Shirt, Topshop. Jeans, Topshop. Marl socks, model’s own.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12187%%[/mm-hide-text]

Necklaces, both Freedom at Topshop.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12188%%[/mm-hide-text]

Kaftan, Zara

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12190%%[/mm-hide-text]

Denim top, Front Row. Mom jeans, vintage. Heels, Primark.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12191%%[/mm-hide-text]

Watch, vintage Sekonda. Honeybee necklace, Pia. Faberge egg necklace, stylist’s own. All other jewellery, model’s own.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12192%%[/mm-hide-text]

White polo-neck, Zara. White jersey, layered underneath, Marks and Spencer. Denim pinafore, Asos. Choker, as before.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12193%%[/mm-hide-text]

Camel coat, Zara. Black felt fedora, Topshop. Leather slingbacks, Topshop.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12194%%[/mm-hide-text]

Kaftan, Zara. Jeans, J Brand. Leather slingbacks, Topshop.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12195%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12196%%[/mm-hide-text]

Boots, from top to bottom, Primark, Topshop, Topshop, Zara.

New frontiers: cashing in your microchips

0

Moore’s Law has become a common and oft-repeated adage in the technology world: that every two years computer circuitry will halve in size and double in power. The prescience and veracity of this statement, originally made in 1975 (revised from a 1965 prediction of it doubling each year) has proved staggering, and helped encourage research and development that has plunged the world into the digital age, and revolutionised the way we access and respond to culture. Who knew that beyond measures of megahertz and kilobytes lay a different form of power – one to radically alter the landscape of culture and human experience. As a result of this, culture has seeped ever more inescapably into every day lives, finding new forms and means of distribution to saturate our existence with content, images, and brands. With these reality-altering chips pouring out of Silicon Valley, one has to wonder when this valley has become the whole world. 

The increasing affordability, portability and accessibility of these chips have revolutionised technology for the last decade, spurring a global age which has shrunk our temporal and spatial distances to almost meaningless measurements. Global society has been pushed ever further into an age of instant information that has revolutionised financial markets, the surveillance society and is now becoming powerful enough to forge new realities.

The mid-Noughties popularity of massive, multiplayer online gaming, and its apparent ability to distort all decent conceptions of sleeping and waking for those more committed denizens, was just the beginning. Nintendo’s Wii and its imitators encouraged virtual reality’s first tentative steps out of the screen and into the consumer mass market. Now hitting the market we have the head-ensconsing Google Glass project (currently being redeveloped), Oculus Rift and Playstation VR headsets. Virtual reality is going mainstream. Anyone who’s seen the demonstrations going out of gaming expo E3 for the last few years know that tangible reality is about to become seemingly plastered with art assets, villains and storytelling. But virtual reality is also becoming increasingly attractive to advertisers, with film content. A recent promotion for Reese Witherspoon vehicle Wild saw users interact with film content. And with VR capturing equipment about to burst into the prosumer market (look to the Nokia OZO), the complete branding of ‘reality’ is about to become commonplace. 

But perhaps the most seismic of changes brought about by the proliferation of increasingly shrinking silicon chips is the omnipresent collection of data. Realities that rely upon the hyperreal – online content, videos, Twitter feeds etc. – are now shaped by the fact that indispensable gadgets collect data on our whereabouts, content preferences and usage patterns. The usual sense of panicked unease at this realisation has been explored and moralised on in the paranoia of the seminal Matrix Trilogy. The mantra “If it’s free, you’re the product” is a pretty solid guide to the state of things. 

This collecting and utilisation of preferences by giant corporate networks may seem insignificant on an individual level, but it simply isn’t. Access to the young taste-making demographic is vital to marketing firm trying to push its latest meme-able monstrosity into the public’s collective conscious. Companies utilise your browsing history to target advertisements. And the likelihood of you engaging with it? Google probably has a better idea than you.

In the beginnings of the information society, there existed only a comparative handful of channels of information, its curation and policing located more obviously in political institutions and social assumptions that needed to be constantly reinforced. Curation of social and cultural experience was carried out at a higher level, at a remove from the individual. Potentially noxious yes, but it also crystallised a sense of community, common understandings and cultural touchstones. Now this is slipping. The personalisation of reality – that of both the real and the hyperreal – atomises and isolates the individual from tangible reality. 

The result? Reinforced ignorance. If we’re constantly presented with what we know, what we know we like, and most importantly what corporations think we’ll want to buy, our horizons will be shrunk by the logable click. Netflix, Youtube and Spotify wring a couple more page views out of you by suggesting media which you’ve already consumed (or which is strikingly similar formally and thematically), and therefore stripped of its cultural and mind-expanding utility. The age of information and media saturation has transformed ignorance into a choice, whilst at the same time obscuring and discouraging the individual from making the active decision to acquire wider knowledge. 

Because media-based culture now exists almost totally transnationally, prejudices are reinforced more easily between what were previously cultural hierarchies. Vertically organised groups defined by factors such as age and income now connect laterally, sealing themselves off from the media consumed by those in categories above and below them. YouTube stars, to whom being ‘unchallenging’ in all aspects is the operative mode for building a global audience of middle class teenagers, to whom the three visible walls of their bedroom is about as far as their thirst for ideas reaches. Twitter ‘stanning’ (‘stalker’ + ‘fan’) is perhaps the most obvious example of what happens when youth culture is almost entirely sealed off from wider, and perhaps wiser, cultural supervision, even as self-expression is increasingly monitored and utilised by parties who can monetize your expressed preferences. 

Does this paint a dystopian picture? That’s up for you to decide. But after recent pronunciations from Intel execs that the pace of chip development may be falling behind Moore’s Law, it seems we may have to wait a good while longer to reach the zenith (or is that nadir?) of the silicon age 

 

How Newsnight lost its teeth

1

Newsnight should always be an uncomfortable experience for someone, but since Jeremy Paxman left the show last year, that someone has all too frequently been his replacement, Evan Davis. In Paxman’s era the show was gladiatorial; we watched it as much for the schadenfreude of seeing his tongue tied victims squirm as we did to be informed. There were of course critics who thought that Paxman’s aggression derailed reasoned discussion, but they were missing the point of Newsnight, a show which always will be more fraught than other debate programs no matter who presents it. Newsnight always will be the most nerve-wracking show on TV for a politician to be invited onto, because it is on every weeknight, meaning that guests can be interrogated on issues their spin doctors have had almost no time to address. Paxman was exactly the right man for this format.

The typical interviewer’s reflex action is to begin with a rather long and cushy introduction, telling the interviewee about themselves, praising their hard work and their successful career. But Paxman knew this kind of introduction wastes time and gives the interviewee the upper hand; he knew the value of concision. He began his grilling of Ed Miliband, one of the cruellest of his career, by asking the would-be Prime Minister “Is Britain full?” This question was brilliant because even though its meaning was perfectly clear, its terseness took Miliband aback, provoking his asinine response, “As in immigration?” by which time the debate was essentially lost before it had begun.

Evan Davis, by contrast, has a talent for stumbling around in search of an opening gambit for minutes before actually beginning his belated, half-hearted attack. Take his interview with Russell Brand for instance – he began it by pointing at Brand’s new book and saying: “It’s a very interesting book and there’s a lot in it and we’ve got a lot to talk about, haven’t we?” While Davis was spending too long saying nothing Brand was already cutting across him, and this was how the next fifteen painful minutes continued. What was especially shocking to any fan of Paxman’s was the bodily contact Brand made with Davis – can you imagine anyone patting Paxman’s thigh mid question?

But Davis can also hammer at a point when he wants to – it’s just unfortunate that the point rarely happens to be the right one. In his appalling interview with Stephen Fry for instance, he persisted in comparing Fry’s destructive, but only self-destructive, cocaine habit to Jimmy Savile’s monstrous crimes. Fry had the look of a high school politics teacher enduring the ramblings of the largest ego in his class.

Oscar Wilde’s definition of a gentleman – someone who is only rude when he means to be – is also an essential quality in the interviewer. There are few faster ways of destroying your public and personal credibility than accidentally insulting your interviewee, but this is what Davis managed to do about once every minute in his interview with Fry. At one point he even asked him to admit he’s not a very good actor. The result of all of which is, Newsnight is still brimming with schadenfreude, but it’s no longer the guests we’re laughing at.