Tuesday 21st October 2025
Blog Page 1146

Milestones: East Side Gallery

0

Midnight on 9th November 1989. In images broadcast around the world, the Berlin Wall is pulled down. People across the world watched live, as the divide between East and West, between communism and capitalism, was destroyed in these instantly iconic images.

The victory of the West and its political ideology of liberalism, the fall of the iron curtain, the rise of David Hasselhoff to inexplicable national treasure status. Call it what you will, but the fall of the Berlin Wall has become recognised amongst the most important events of the twentieth century.

From the ruins of this wall, which had loomed 3.6 metres above the heads of Berliners for fi ve decades, came a 1.3km stretch to be preserved. Representing less than a hundredth of the wall’s original length, this section was to be named The East Side Gallery. Opened in 1990, the wall is the world’s longest-running and largest outdoor gallery, with a permanent exhibition of 105 murals by different painters. The gallery is intended to represent a peaceful world of expression, celebrating ideas of artistic expression and individual freedoms in the liberal tradition. It is a celebration of all that the West held (and continues to hold) dear, and all that the East renounced. It is a historical object as much as it is an art gallery.

But it’s historical import extends beyond representing a definitive moment in German history. It announces the victory of neoliberalism, of late capitalism, and individualism across the world. The communist East fell, and in the vacuum that followed the market found room to expand. The fall of the Berlin Wall represents the extinguishing of the old left, tied to utilitarian conceptions and ideas of Marxist structures. The East Side Gallery is evidence of and the direct result of a milestone in world history.

The murals occupy an interesting position – they are at once both graffiti and state sanctioned art. But where traditional graffiti challenges capitalist conceptions of ownership and private property through its choice of canvas, the East Side Gallery uses graffiti to instead symbolise a diff erent, less clear notion of freedom of expression.

The Gallery’s most famous painting, which depicts the socialist fraternal kiss between Leonid Brezhnev and Erich Honecker that sealed an international arms deal back in 1979, has been reproduced around the world. Written in Russian above the painting are the words “God help me to survive this deadly love aff air.” Beyond the tension between the visceral passion of the image and the formal context it is set within (the suits and smart presentation of the two men), the painting’s de facto role as the face of the gallery is unsurprising. It embodies all that the gallery holds dear. It re-contextualises the past through its use of the photograph, as the wall itself turns a former means of oppression into art. It’s highly political, as the gallery itself inescapably is. And it’s the site of continued reworkings of meaning, particularity in light of Russia’s ongoing anti-LGBT policies. This too the gallery itself has faced through being actually graffi tied by street artists keen to have their work exhibited on perhaps the world’s most famous wall.

After extensive and ongoing restorative work since 2009 the gallery looks to remain a huge part of Berlin’s cultural identity and a cultural touchstone recognised in Instagrams and Facebook posts across the globe. But beyond a cool point-winning backdrop for some sixth former’s interrailing status update, the East Side Gallery stands as a testament to the victory of capitalism over communism, of the power of images in a media society, and ultimately of the neo-liberal world’s ability to neutralise and utilise all that stands against it – even graffiti.

IAAF runs into trouble

0

It’s hard to believe in governing bodies in sport any more. Sep Blatter’s well-documented demise over the last few months was shocking, but ultimately predictable – FIFA’s decision to award Qatar the 2022 World Cup hosting rights, and then consequently bending rules and tradition to allow the event to be played in winter, was clearly an indication of the corruption that has deeply infiltrated the entire organization.

Before any of us even had the chance to recover, out comes the news that the International Association of Athletics Federations was paid to allow eight athletes, whom officials recommended should be banned, to participate in the 2012 London Olympic games.

What started as allegations made in a German TV documentary of systematic doping and cover-ups in Russia has now transformed into a whirlwind of investigations and condemnations. German broadcaster ARD/WDR obtained access to the results of 12,000 blood tests from 5,000 athletes between 2001 and 2012 and discovered that a third of the medals were won by athletes with shady test results during those years, including ten medal-winners in the 2012 Olympic games. Papa Massata Diack, former consultant to the IAAF and son of former IAAF president Lamine Diack, was charged along with Gabriel Dolle, former head of the IAAF anti-doping department, and two former senior members of All-Russian Athletic Federation. The investigations are still ongoing, with one investigator from the World Anti-Doping Agency claiming that the results will reveal “a whole different scale of corruption” compared to the FIFA scandal.

The conclusion to draw from all of this is rather obvious – organizational corruption remains the biggest stain to the image and perception of organized sport. Organisations such as the IAAF established to champion the ideals of competition and celebrate human athleticism have now disintegrated into a vortex of venality and fraud.

The worst part about it is that there is no easy solution as it is no longer simply a matter of picking the bad fruits out of the basket – systematic corruption has set its roots into the very nexus of these organisations to the point where faith in human integrity is no longer strong enough to undermine the ultimately tempting inclination to cheat.

Yes, some of the blame can be attributed to the individual athletes who have made a decided effort to cheat the system and robbed others of the rewards of their hard work. Tatyana Chernova, who won gold at the 2011 World Championships over Jessica Ennis-Hill, has since served a two-year ban whilst four of the top five finishers in the women’s 1500m at the 2005 Helsinki World Championships hailed from Russia.

Incidents like this not only make one wonder why the recent IAAF allegations have only just surfaced, but also provide cause for lament in the sense that, ever so gradually, fans and viewers who tune in to athletics can no longer believe that the medals are going to those who truly deserve them – that hard work actually does pay off.

Once that goes completely, sport will have lost its true purpose, all because of the particular faults of certain individuals.

Perhaps the ray of hope lies with the fact that more media attention has been attracted by these scandals, meaning that organisations can no longer get away with wrongdoings or brush them aside as if they are of negligible importance. One can only hope that this continues for the sake of sport’s integrity as well as the faith of fans.

Why Rhodes’ statue must stand

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12366%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Illustration: Ella Baron

Living and working in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia’s capital city, in a job my Oxford master’s helped me to land, I am surrounded by statues of Genghis Khan, founder of the largest contiguous empire ever seen. Under his leadership, the Mongol Empire spread through wholesale slaughter from the Pacific Ocean to the Caspian Sea. For the Khan and his armies, rape and pillage were the spoils of war.

Given he might well have been the world’s most prolific rapist – it is believed that a significant proportion of people alive today are his descendants – should those statues be removed? That some people and institutions achieved greatness through terrible means is a matter of which we should be frequently reminded, not something to be consigned to the dustbin of history.

Earlier this year, a statue of Cecil Rhodes at the University of Cape Town was covered in human excrement by students. Having successfully demanded its removal, the protest movement known as Rhodes Must Fall has made its way to Oxford, where students gathered last Friday outside Oriel College, the statue’s home. Presenting a petition to the Vice-Provost and Senior Dean of Oriel College, to which the Grade II* listed building belongs, they declared that Rhodes must fall in Oxford. Despite their good intentions, I believe that, although Rhodes’ legacy should be challenged and its shameful history exposed, his statue in Oxford must stand.

Cecil John Rhodes was an influential British imperialist, phenomenally rich businessman and politician in South Africa. He founded the state of Rhodesia in the late nineteenth century and South Africa’s Rhodes University through the Rhodes Trust, an educational charity set up on his instructions in his last will and testament. He was a major benefactor of the University of Cape Town, which sits on land bequeathed by Rhodes, and Oriel College, Oxford, his alma mater, to which he donated two per cent of his considerable fortune. In Oxford, he lends his name to the Rhodes Building, Rhodes House and the prestigious Rhodes Scholarship, which enables students from around the world to study at Oxford and is funded by his estate. Its 7,000 beneficiaries have included former heads of government or heads of state of the United States, Canada, Australia, Pakistan, Jamaica and Malta.

He was also an unfathomable racist. Rhodes believed in the supremacy of the Anglo-Saxon race, encouraging the expansion of the British Empire by profound violence and subjugation of other races to cover the entirety of the “uncivilised world”, which he supposed was “inhabited by the most despicable specimens of human beings”. He sought to assert the dominance of Anglo-Saxons under one empire, including bringing the United States back under British rule, and to “crush all disloyalty and every movement for [its] severance”. His legacy is overwhelmingly one of death and human misery. Perhaps of greatest import, whilst serving as Prime Minister of the Cape Colony from 1890 to 1896, he oversaw the introduction of the Glen Grey Act, a piece of legislation that laid the foundations for apartheid South Africa.

Rhodes is clearly someone to be reviled by both today’s standards and those of his day. But tearing down his statue outside Oriel College, which many students argue glorifies British colonialism, would be missing the point – setting a dangerous example of historical revisionism and denying future generations the debates we are having now. Rhodes Must Fall is not just about statues. Its supporters call for the ‘decolonisation’ of education, whereby reading lists populated singularly by the voices of privileged, white men should be overhauled, Oxford’s tiny proportion of BME professors redressed, and non-Western perspectives introduced into academic discussion. So, too, do they lament the ignorance of many British students about the realities of their country’s colonial history. Meritorious as these goals are, if they are to achieve them, it will be by educating and challenging the ill-informed – not tearing down a statue.

Oxford should face up to its colonial past, but not distort the historical record. That a murderous, imperialist brute is so closely aligned to that past that a statue was erected in his honour and Rhodes House was built in his memory is part of that history, and part of the reason many people are aware of it and feel so passionately about it in the first place. To remove the statue would be to erase this visible reminder that the abhorrent Rhodes occupied such a significant place in the fabric and finances of Oriel College and the University as a whole. Indeed, one of the reasons for the listed status of the Rhodes Building and the statue itself is their great historical value, the listing text acknowledging that Rhodes was “a controversial figure, but of immense historical importance and whose legacies had a major impact on the University.”

Had his statue not stood on the High Street today, this level of debate and awareness of the true nature of his legacy would simply not exist, and the student body would be more ignorant of it – an outcome that goes against one of the fundamental goals of Rhodes Must Fall. Come most revolutions, the statues of the previous regime are the first things to fall, followed in due course by the collective memory of it.

Rhodes Must Fall should be praised for stimulating a debate we should have had long ago. But the statue can stand without glorifying the man whose memory it preserves if its viewers are properly informed – the responsibility of which must fall on both the College and the University. A museum on the many horrors of colonialism, commemorating its many victims, and a plaque near the statue would be a good place to start.

Cameron in ‘hypocritical’ Oxfordshire County Council letter

0

David Cameron faces charges of hypocrisy after he wrote to the leader of Oxfordshire County Council, Mr Ian Hudspeth, protesting about cuts being made to frontline public services.

The letter, written in September but leaked to the Oxford Mail in the last few days, expressed disappointment about council plans to cut funding for services such as libraries and elderly day centres, suggesting back-office savings and shared service solutions should be investigated instead.

Mr Hudspeth replied with a six-page document rebutting each of the points made, pointing out how extensive cuts had already been made in these areas and arguing that, given budget constraints, the council was left with little choice.

In his letter, the Prime Minister wrote, “I was disappointed at the long list of suggestions floated to make significant cuts to frontline services. I would have hoped that Oxfordshire would instead be following the best practice of Conservative councils from across the country in making back-office savings and protecting the frontline.”

In his reply, Mr Hudspeth pointed out, “Our significant savings over recent years have included taking out as much from the back-office as possible”, and claimed, “Our revenue support grant funding has fallen by almost 50 per cent in the first half of this decade…Other funding streams have not kept pace with this, particularly in real terms.”

Mr Hudspeth, a representative of the Conservatives since 1999, also questioned the factual accuracy in parts of Cameron’s letter. In response to the PM’s description of the cuts to government grants for Oxfordshire as a “slight fall”, Mr Hudspeth wrote, “I cannot accept your description of a drop in funding of £72m or 37 per cent as a ‘slight fall’.”

In another part of the letter, referring to Cameron’s comment that, “Your briefing note suggested that £204m had been taken out of the budget since 2010”, Mr Hudspeth appears to state that the PM misunderstood the statistics, writing, “I cannot emphasise enough that £204m is not a cumulative figure…cumulative savings since 2010/11 are in fact £626m.”

A spokeswoman for Downing Street said, “There is still significant scope for sensible savings across local government to be made by back office consolidation, disposing of surplus property and joining up our local public services; we will be discussing with Oxfordshire how this can be taken forward to help protect frontline services.”

Nonetheless, there are now widespread questions over how far the PM comprehends the extent of the cuts his government has mandated. John McDonnell, Shadow Chancellor, joked, “I’m backing David Cameron on this one. He is absolutely right that his chancellor’s cuts to local government are seriously damaging our communities and have to be opposed. I welcome the Prime Minister as another Tory MP joining our campaign against George Osborne’s cuts.”

Cameron’s subsequent offer of a meeting with his Downing Street policy unit has led to Labour council leaders around the country inundating the PM with requests for the same treatment and serious accusations of an abuse of ministerial privileges, favouring his own constituency’s local council.

Local Oxfordshire figures have joined in criticisms of Cameron’s apparent lack of understanding about Oxfordshire Council’s difficulties, which includes his own Witney constituency. Leader of the Liberal Democrats at Oxfordshire Council, Richard Webber, commented, “It is staggering that the Prime Minister knows so little of the impact of his government’s cuts in his own backyard”.

Meanwhile, leader of Oxford City Council Bob Price, told Cherwell, “It is particularly surprising that an Oxfordshire MP who gets regular briefing from his fellow County Tories should have put his name to such a dismissive and insouciant letter.”

Labour Councillor Liz Brighouse went so far as to suggest that the PM was relying on dubious information from civil servants, to the detriment of those affected by local cuts, commenting, “Our budget is being spent on the most vulnerable people. But Mr Cameron has not bothered to speak to anyone here and has just relied on his people in Whitehall to tell him what is going on.”

Among some Oxford students, this news has been met with similar derision. The Oxford University Labour Club told Cherwell, “David Cameron’s letter to the Conservative leader of Oxfordshire County Council shows just how out of touch he is with the delivery of public services both in Oxford and across the country. Unfortunately, in Oxfordshire, cuts have had a harmful impact on many frontline services, such as the provision of social care and community projects.

“What I can say is that these letters are part of an ongoing discussion with government about how we can protect frontline services while doing our bit in Oxfordshire to tackle the national budget deficit – a government policy that I support. To do this, we are having to make some very difficult decisions, which is why we are consulting the public on all the options.”

Neither Hudspeth nor the Oxford University Conservative Association responded to Cherwell’s request for comment.

Review: Ellie Goulding – Delirium

0

★★☆☆☆

 Two Stars

Delirium is the husky-voiced Goulding’s third studio album. After the rather confusing ‘Intro’, which is often likened to an early 7th Century Gregorian chant, Goulding slips back into more familiar shoes. There are a few rather bland synth-pop tracks, including ‘Aftertaste’, mixed in with crowd pleasers like the X-rated ‘Love Me Like You Do’ from the worryingly popular Fifty Shades of Grey. The song stands out from the rest of the album tracks for holding a convincing tune and employing only slightly repetitive lyrics.

Goulding issued an accompanying statement to the album, referring to it as an “experiment”. Having listened to it, spotting the raw experimentation is harder than finding Wally. This is not to say it’s a bad “big pop album”, but neither were her last two big pop albums. It would appear that Goulding is sometimes let down in the production of her songs, losing the smooth, crooning qualities of her vocals to a low-budget synth keyboard (I’m sure it’s actually a very expensive synth keyboard made to sound like it was free from a car boot sale), and Delirium is no exception.

True experimentation for Goulding would strip away the flashy lights and basic pop anthem beats to reveal a raw emotion of which songs like ‘How Long Will I Love You?’ have proven her capable.

Oriel liberation officers referendum saga continues

0

A referendum to introduce three new liberation officer positions within Oriel JCR has been delayed due to problems with the college online voting service BallotBin.

In the referendum, the JCR proposes to introduce three new positions to the JCR Committee including a Women’s Officer, BME Officer and Disabilities Officer.

Hustings for the referendum took place on Sunday at a two-hour JCR meeting, although Section 11(b) of the Oriel JCR constitution declares that, “Hustings must be held no more than three full days before polling.”

According to the motion, JCR members will be encouraged only to vote in those elections if they self-identify with the liberation group that each Officer would represent, for each of the Officer positions introduced. The Proposition felt that Officers are there to represent their liberation groups in College and that it would be only fair if each respective liberation group gets to decide who will be their officer.

However, issues have been raised within the JCR as to the wording of the referendum. In particular, the opposition has found that this motion, worded as one referendum rather than several separate referenda for three new roles, to be problematic and limiting in that it disallows for a student to disagree with parts of the referendum.

In addition, the voting rights proposed would not be inclusive for other college members where they are not actively encouraged to vote someone into a position that has a voting right within the JCR committee.

Concern was also raised by the opposition at the ‘fully-elected’ nature of the roles, meaning a poll would be taken online rather than in person at a JCR open meeting, which is referred to as ‘semi-elected’. However, JCR President Kate Welsh defended the nature of the online elections, arguing that they preserved anonymity for self-identifying members of the liberation groups concerned.

James Power, a second-year Computer Science and Philosophy student and designated opposition speaker, told Cherwell, “I am glad that Kate, our JCR President, has brought this referendum. It shows that Oriel is engaging with and beginning to start a positive process to further represent minority groups on our JCR committee. Sometimes I think people are quick to judge you and call you out for opposing a motion like this. But really, I, along with Kate, want to make Oriel a more inclusive place and it’s great that we can have a frank, honest and open discussion about the best way in which to do this.”

Semi-elected LGBTQ Rep of Oriel, Elliot Parrott, told Cherwell, “I was happy to notice the explicit inclusion of mental health problems and learning difficulties under the remit of the Disabilities Officer, as these problems are often not acknowledged or treated as ‘real disabilities’.”

Parrott added, “I was disappointed but unsurprised to hear the majority of complaints coming from people for whom these roles would likely be irrelevant – though of course it is impossible to tell how someone identifies with regards to race, gender or disability just by looking at them.”

The proposition noted that it is impossible to sufficiently represent every minority group, gender or disability on the JCR Committee. However, having one Equal Opportunities Rep was inadequate when attempting to create an inclusive and representative committee that represents the student body.

As a result, the replacement of this position with multiple officer positions will aim to enable the College to recognise the diversity within the liberation groups that they represent in a way that the proposition claims one Equal Opportunities Rep fails to do.

Parrott commented, “Oriel – the last Oxford college to admit women as undergraduates, the home of the infamous statue of Cecil Rhodes, and a college with virtually no accessible accommodation and very few accessible teaching rooms – has been behind the times for too long now, and I hope that the addition of a Women’s Officer, BME Officer, and Disabilities Officer (as well as the semi-elected role of LGBTQ Rep being upgraded to a fully elected LGBTQ Officer) will help the college become a more welcoming place for all of its students.”

The referendum has since been confirmed as taking place on Friday.

Live Review: Keston Cobblers’ Club

0

Sometimes a little bit of jolty folk is just the ticket. An hour before they’re due onstage at the Bullingdon just down the road, Kent five-piece Keston Cobblers Club take to the stage in Oxford’s finest record treasure trove, Truck Store. Or, rather, they tuck themselves into the corner without mics and stomp and laugh their way through a short, sweet and very cosy set of acoustic numbers.

Laden with a limited drum kit (read: a sole snare), acoustic guitar and ukulele, the band could have been any ramshackle group of musicians pushed into this civilised setting of sofas and coffees amongst stacks of vinyl. But their somewhat alternative instrumentation adds an unforeseen flair: bass lines are taken up not by a typical string bass, but by tuba-playing Bethan Ecclestone, adding a depth and surprising bounciness to their buoyant, swelling folk-pop.

Covering Paul Simon’s ‘Graceland’ is a modern nod towards the folk tradition of sharing and re-playing songs. Sibling singers Matt and Julia Lowe’s harmonies burst through one another’s melody lines on this track, and castanets begin to get a-thumping.

Latest single ‘Win Again’ closes the set. Its lush syncopated vocal lines lead up to the dramatic, if slightly obvious, compound of ‘oohs’ as the harmonies now become four-part and really take centre stage. The close proximity yet stark deftness of these vocals is not to be messed with.

Brightly coloured children’s bells set next to a pineapple-shaped maraca highlight the crux of this band’s charm:  yes, their folk-pop is easily-listenable, with catchy riffs and gorgeous swooping melodies. But they’re a folk band – they play music for fun. And through this pounding percussion and these raucous tunes, Keston Cobblers Club take the Oxford crowd far away from the corner of a record shop on a rainy November evening, and back to the Kentish tavern and the local fiddler-come-cobbler from whom the band get their truly folksy name. 

Bodleian acquires lost Shelley poem

0

The Bodleian Libraries have bought a lost poem by Percy Bysshe Shelley, marking their 12 millionth book.

The poem was published in 1811 when Shelley was in his first year at Oxford, but remained lost until 2006. This is the only copy of the poem in existence and was written shortly before he was expelled from Oxford.

The 20-page pamphlet entitled ‘Poetical Essay on the Existing State of Things’ contains a 10-page poem of 172 lines with both a preface and notes from the author himself. This pamphlet, which was printed by stationers on Oxford High Street over 200 years ago, will also be available online for free for the public.

The poem begins: “Destruction marks thee! o’er the blood-stain’d heath/ Is faintly borne the stifled wail of death;/ Millions to fight compell’d, to fight or die/ In mangled heaps on War’s red altar lie.” It goes on to address issues of the dysfunctional political institutions, the global impact of war and the abuse of the press.

After the copy of the pamphlet was rediscovered, having believed to have been lost to fire, a London book dealer held possession of it until the Bodleian acquired it. Richard Ovenden, Bodley’s Librarian, announced this news at the Weston Library on Tuesday evening. The actress and political activist Vanessa Redgrave read its preface, while Oxford students read the poem itself.

The price of the pamphlet remains confidential, but Cherwell understands it was purchased with the support of a benefactor.

Ovenden said, “The mission of a great library like the Bodleian is to preserve and manage its collections for the benefit of scholarship and to put knowledge into the hands of readers of all kinds. Through acquiring our 12 millionth book, ‘Poetical Essay on the Existing State of Things,’ we will be preserving this remarkable work for ever, and making available online a lost work by one of the greatest poets of all time. We are extremely grateful to the generous donors who made this acquisition and our website possible.”

Michael Rossington, Professor of Romantic Literature at the University of Newcastle stated, “This is a tremendously exciting moment. This substantial poem has been known about for years but as far as we know it hasn’t been read by any Shelley biographers or scholars since it was composed, and people are intrigued to find out exactly what it’s about. The poem is very interesting because it marks a new stage in Shelley’s development as a poet, revealing his early interest in the big issues of his day and his belief that poetry can be used to alter public opinion and effect change.”

Vanessa Redgrave CBE, said “I first read Shelley’s ‘The Masque of Anarchy’ when I was very young. He is intoxicating to read. His words transport you. I’m thrilled that, thanks to the Bodleian and its generous donors, this long lost poem of Shelley’s can be studied by students all over the world.”

The poem was written in response to Britain’s involvement in the Napoleonic Wars and in support of Irish journalist Peter Finnerty, who was accused of libel by the government and was imprisoned after criticising British military operations.

In the same year as writing this poem, he was expelled from Oxford after refusing to deny he had written a pamphlet called ‘The Necessity of Atheism’.

In Ovenden’s speech on Tuesday evening, he also said, “Our 12 millionth book was thought lost for 200 years. It was written by Percy Bysshe Shelley, an Oxford undergraduate, a twenty year-old who had already, somewhat precociously, been published as a novelist and poet.

“Although from a privileged background, he held strong moral principles like political freedom, the freedom of the press, the horrors of war, and the injustices that war and tyranny bring to the lives of ordinary people. His views on religion were radical enough to get him thrown out of Oxford. This young, passionate, brilliant undergraduate took the manuscripts of his latest poem a few hundred yards up the High Street from his college rooms at Univ to the printing firm Munday and Slatter, where it was printed and placed in their shop window.

“All of this transpired in the spring of 1811, a few short weeks before Shelley would be expelled from his college and from his university – and the stock of this book lost – probably through an act of deliberate destruction.

“This young man would however, rise above these misfortunes and become one of the most famous and influential poets of all time, one whose work is still studied, read, enjoyed and which remains a source of inspiration today.”

The poem will be on display at the Weston Library until 23 December, the online version is available at poeticalessay.bodleian.ox.ac.uk.

Live Review: Declan Zapala

0

If, like me, you hail from Watford and you discover the town has produced something beautiful, YOU.GRAB.HOLD.OF.IT. I’ve been raving about The Staves for months, less so about Vinnie Jones, Geri Halliwell and Elton. But now I can proudly add Declan Zapala to my list of home-town gems, especially since I later discover he attended my school. Zapala entertained a small crowd in the recently opened Attico Art Gallery, promoting his new album Awakenings and his performance was as visual as it was auditory. His guitar was caressed either brazenly like a sitar or tenderly like a new-born baby, depending on which angle afforded the best sound. In fact Zapala transforms the instrument beyond a guitar: his dexterity produces an entire percussion base and even a double bass such as in the song ‘Broken Rhapsody’ by loosening the strings mid-song. On the percussive guitar spectrum, with Rodrgo y Gabriela and Ben Howard at either stylistic extreme, I would place Zapala midway. He’s a solo artist, but not a singer/songwriter, and whilst his rhythm is more energetic and less mellow than Howard, the frenetic, carnival-esque fury of the Mexican duo is simply alien to the charming, lilting tributes of Zapala to his family. In fact his mother was in the audience, and the song ‘Philomena’ is dedicated to her. Glancing at her during this enchanting song, I could tell something special and personal was being communicated.

After uploading ‘Crystal’ to YouTube, Zapala was launched, and for good reason. Performed live with fierce energy, the guitar itself was in motion, every string blurred with vibration whilst the lower guitar body was intricately drummed. The beginning is like something gothic from the A Series of Unfortunate Events soundtrack, but then four minutes in, it gets super dynamic. Zapala said that The Selfish Gene inspired Crystals with questions like ‘What is life?’ and the miracle of atomic particles interpreted through percussive guitar. Throughout the evening, Zapala would warmly discuss his music, also taking the opportunity to remind us that we were on Watford High Street. Well, geographically yes, but musically we couldn’t be further. Whisked away to his locations of inspiration, we enjoyed the music of Turkish goat herders, Irish folk ballads and Spanish serenades. Zapala’s influences are both unusual and popular; Carlo Domeniconi, Eric Roche and Led Zeppelin to name a few, but the Classical element is also important. The album includes guitar renditions of Bach’s cello suite and prelude.

Innuendoes featuring lube and floppy microphones aside, I could have been attending a prosecco-fuelled mindfulness class. Nothing short of mesmerising, Zapala’s is the kind of music which releases your thoughts, particularly in ‘Sleeping Gently’ – a song written for his nephew – with the pitter-patter plucking evoking raindrops. I wonder several things: how his hands aren’t bruised…how I could possibly be in Watford…how I could write up such a unique performance… There is an incredible intelligence, strength and concentration to Zapala. Definitely worth a listen!

Interview: The Cribs at the O2 Academy

0

In a nondescript dressing room backstage at the O2 Academy, Ryan Jarman, guitarist of Wakefield trio The Cribs, tells me the story of the  band since their first show in Oxford  11 years ago.

Then, the three Jarmans, Ryan, twin Gary and younger brother Ross,  were touring relentlessly following the release of their raw and self-produced eponymous debut . They often played for free or multiple times a night in tiny venues, to hone their act and raise their profile. But Ryan is far from nostalgic for those early days, happy to move on to bigger and better things. “We’ve already had that intimacy”, he tells me.

Now, the band are playing in support of their sixth record, For All My Sisters. This is the first release following their move to Sony from the independent Wichita Recordings. “I feel like our relationship had changed a little”, Jarman explains, though alas without further elaboration . But it’s been a very positive move, he tells me.  “Because we’ve been around for so long, they know what band they’re getting, so we’re kind of more independent than before”.

More than just the label has changed since those early days. Though Ross has remained in Wakefield (where a plaque commemorates the city’s most famous musical sons), Ryan now lives in New York and Gary is based in Portland, Oregon. Ryan sees this as broadening the band’s musical horizons. “If we all still lived together, we’d have a lack of inspiration. Now we’re all very different people, who bring different things to the table.” Indeed, Ryan delights in telling me about his projects outside of The Cribs, including forming a band with his American wife as well as collaborating with Julian Casablancas of The Strokes.

But it’s not all different on this album for The Cribs. Jarman tells me how it represents something of a return to an earlier sound.  The band’s third album, Men’s Needs, Women’s Needs, Whatever, progressed from their initial lo-fi offerings (being slickly produced by Alex Kapranos of Franz Ferdinand) and  propelled them into the realm of critical and commercial success. Subsequently, ex-The Smiths and Modest Mouse guitarist Johnny Marr joined the band from 2008 to 2011. “Once that record came out, Johnny joined the band and that took us in a different direction. Then Johnny left, and that sent us off in another completely different direction”. Thus, whereas Jarman describes their previous release, In the Belly of the Brazen Bull, as “dark, heavy and sprawling”, he sees their newest record as “a bit more stripped back, a bit simpler, a bit poppier” – the follow-up to Men’s Needs… that never was.

Out on stage, Esper Scout and The Wytches warm up the crowd with a punchy style clearly influenced by heavy listening to The Cribs in their formative years (“It makes us feel old”, Jarman had told me earlier). However, they received a fairly lukewarm reception from a crowd clearly full of ardent fans awaiting their heroes. Jarman had told me they ” try to keep it as interesting as possible… we do everything to make sure this doesn’t feel like a job” by avoiding endless repetition of setlists and trying to focus on newer material. Though, of course, this is hard to balance against the demands of a crowd yearning  for the hits. Indeed, their efforts to rest fan favourite Another Number earlier in this tour were curtailed when the crowd  began to sing the characteristic riff as they attempted another song.

The band’s 90 minute set was well-received by the energetic and engaged crowd, who went wild for classics such as “Hey Scenesters” and “Mirror Kissers”, and rapidly warmed to the diverse introductions from the new album, including the catchy “Burning for No One”, the Weezer-esque “An Ivory Hand” (the album is produced by Ric Ocasek, who worked on Weezer’s Blue album) and the swirling, mesmeric “Pink Snow”,  which ended their sweaty set.

The Cribs are a remarkable band. They’ve released six albums that are each unique and special in their own way, yet they’re able to deftly blend choice pickings from each together to create a phenomenal live set. From the performance given tonight, and the bubbling enthusiasm of the Jarman brothers for their music and their fans, it’s clear this will continue for many years and albums to come.