Saturday 26th July 2025
Blog Page 1150

Review: The Ordinary Boys – The Ordinary Boys

0

 â˜…★★☆☆

 Three Stars

My first impression of The Ordinary Boys had been their sickly (and irritatingly misspelt, which I’m sure is ironic but annoys me anyway) pop love song ‘I Luv You’ released on their 2007 album. Enough to put me off them for a while, I’ve largely ignored their output, until giving them a second chance with their new eponymous album. Expecting bland pop, imagine my surprise when more than decent indie rock reminiscent of late Blink-182 blared out of my speakers.

Even the dubious-sounding ‘Four Letter Word’ isn’t the icky mess the title may suggest, rather beginning with a soundbite from the 1982 coming-of-age drama Fast Times at Ridgemont High and leading into a classy rock song that wouldn’t sound out of place between The Strokes and Red Hot Chili Peppers. Some of the songs lack the rough and ready touch that made 90s rock so irresistible; the edges of ‘Panic Attack’ are too rounded to be believable. The song writing might not be pushing any boundaries or breaking new ground, but it feels familiar and comfortable. It’s a refreshing, if not innovative, break from the seemingly constant need of artists today to be doing something different and individual. Sometimes you want a comfy old sweatshirt rather than a fancy new dress.

 

Live Review: The Japanese House

0

It was a relatively small but eager crowd that gathered in the Bullingdon to watch the opening night of The Japanese House’s 10-date UK tour, which also happened to be the group’s first ever live show. After a handful of hyped singles, a fantastic debut EP, and feteing from all the buzz-building outlets anyone could hope for, the pressure was on to deliver.

There was an air of hushed anticipation as the crowd waited for the set to get underway. A sense of mystery has hung around The Japanese House since their debut single, ‘Still’, appeared online back in March of this year. That ethereal sounding track, with its distorted vocals and haunting, confessional lyrics, felt determinedly enigmatic and anonymous. The fact that their visual identity mostly comprised photographs of desolate seascapes that they took themselves only helped fuel the curiosity. Whose voice was that? What gender were they? Waiting there in the Bullingdon, one half expected to witness a Sia-like stunt, with a reclusive performer taking to the stage shrouded in a veil. Thankfully, that never transpired. It turns out the project is masterminded by Amber Bain, a diminutive, unassuming woman who appeared on stage drowning under an oversized grey cable jumper. According to her friends, who peppered the audience, this show was a nerve-wracking prospect for the singer, though you wouldn’t know it, as she delivered a fascinating 40-minute set that moved around between tracks from her previously released EP, Pools To Bathe In, and an upcoming release.

Beneath a sea of mostly blue and purple lights, she gave a deliberately pared-down but well thought through performance, with the music’s captivating harmonies swelling around her low, husky singing voice. Turning her slightly recessive stage presence into a virtue, she replaced cultivated mystery with the real thing.

 The crowd leaned in as she guided them through the layers of astral melodies that rose and crashed in and out of the music. It was a hypnotic show that enthralled, absorbed and beguiled.

 After a bit of brief chat between songs, and without an encore, she and her band left the stage, but she happily stayed to sign records and pose for photos. It was a charming end to a mesmerising set.

As the crowd dispersed in a zen daze, you got the sense that this was the last time you’d get to see The Japanese House at such an intimate venue.

Kobe Bryant’s swan song

0

ESPN’s annual #NBArank project, which counts down the NBA’s top players for the upcoming season, was released last week. Kobe Bryant, the man who has argu­ably been the face of NBA basketball over the course of the last 16 years, was ranked as the 93rd best player out of a possible 400.

For diehard Bryant and Lakers fans, this was a hard one to swallow. Bryant himself obviously was not happy, claiming that the rankings were “silly” and thus continuing the ongoing animosity between himself and the ESPN reporters whom he called “a bunch of idiots” last year after being ranked 40th. To a degree, he has a point – the rankings are en­tirely based on the opinions of 100 reporters, and have notoriously been controversial ev­ery year. Yet the sad reality is that, as someone who is fast approaching the end of a legend­ary career, Kobe Bryant cannot and should not be viewed as an elite, high-performing basketball player any more.

First of all, in order to be one, you actu­ally have to play on a regular basis. In the last two injury-plagued seasons, Bryant only managed to play in 41 out of a possible 164 games. For someone who’s played almost 20 years of professional basketball, this should perhaps be expected, but it should not be disregarded when estimating what Bryant can actually contribute this year. The same principle ap­plies to stars such as Derrick Rose and Dwayne Wade, who have both also dealt with nagging injuries in recent years, but the dif­ference is that Bryant is now 37, preparing to play what he himself has acknowl­edged to be his swan-song season.

Because of age and injuries, Bryant’s once superhuman abilities have deteriorated. Last season, before going down with a severe shoulder injury, Bryant averaged a respectable 22.3 points per game but shot at a rate of 37.3 per cent, well below the league average. This resulted in him only being in the 30th per­centile in player efficiency. Sure, he’s playing on a really bad team plagued by inexperience, unjustified swagger (Google Nick Young) and hilariously-outdated coaching – anyone who still believes that basketball games can be won without three-point shooting, like head coach Byron Scott, counts as a bad coach and needs to be rescued from the 70s. But this is where Bryant’s own legacy haunts him, as he’s shown that he can dominate games on bad teams before – the man averaged just over 35 points a game on a team that started notori­ous scrubs and consequent folklore heroes Kwame Brown and Smush Parker.

This isn’t to say that he can and should do better, given that he is roughly ten years past his peak, as any 37-year-old basketball player would be. But it is an indication that Bryant just can’t do it anymore, which makes this next season all the more daunting for any fan of the NBA. Regardless of whether you’re an admirer or a hater, Kobe Bryant deserves the respect of being the top-ten player in NBA history that he is, and to watch him score eighteen or so meaningless points per game, whilst being evidently frustrated by the lack of success that has defined his last years in the league, will be disappoint­ing.

Bryant chose to take the 93rd rank­ing as an insult. Per­haps he would be better off seeing it as a wake-up call. 

High Hopes, Falling Leaves

0

Photography: Beckie Rutherford
Model: Nina Foster
Concept and Styling: Emily Pritchard

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12185%%[/mm-hide-text]

Shirt, Topshop. Jeans, Topshop. Marl socks, model’s own.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12187%%[/mm-hide-text]

Necklaces, both Freedom at Topshop.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12188%%[/mm-hide-text]

Kaftan, Zara

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12190%%[/mm-hide-text]

Denim top, Front Row. Mom jeans, vintage. Heels, Primark.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12191%%[/mm-hide-text]

Watch, vintage Sekonda. Honeybee necklace, Pia. Faberge egg necklace, stylist’s own. All other jewellery, model’s own.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12192%%[/mm-hide-text]

White polo-neck, Zara. White jersey, layered underneath, Marks and Spencer. Denim pinafore, Asos. Choker, as before.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12193%%[/mm-hide-text]

Camel coat, Zara. Black felt fedora, Topshop. Leather slingbacks, Topshop.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12194%%[/mm-hide-text]

Kaftan, Zara. Jeans, J Brand. Leather slingbacks, Topshop.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12195%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12196%%[/mm-hide-text]

Boots, from top to bottom, Primark, Topshop, Topshop, Zara.

New frontiers: cashing in your microchips

0

Moore’s Law has become a common and oft-repeated adage in the technology world: that every two years computer circuitry will halve in size and double in power. The prescience and veracity of this statement, originally made in 1975 (revised from a 1965 prediction of it doubling each year) has proved staggering, and helped encourage research and development that has plunged the world into the digital age, and revolutionised the way we access and respond to culture. Who knew that beyond measures of megahertz and kilobytes lay a different form of power – one to radically alter the landscape of culture and human experience. As a result of this, culture has seeped ever more inescapably into every day lives, finding new forms and means of distribution to saturate our existence with content, images, and brands. With these reality-altering chips pouring out of Silicon Valley, one has to wonder when this valley has become the whole world. 

The increasing affordability, portability and accessibility of these chips have revolutionised technology for the last decade, spurring a global age which has shrunk our temporal and spatial distances to almost meaningless measurements. Global society has been pushed ever further into an age of instant information that has revolutionised financial markets, the surveillance society and is now becoming powerful enough to forge new realities.

The mid-Noughties popularity of massive, multiplayer online gaming, and its apparent ability to distort all decent conceptions of sleeping and waking for those more committed denizens, was just the beginning. Nintendo’s Wii and its imitators encouraged virtual reality’s first tentative steps out of the screen and into the consumer mass market. Now hitting the market we have the head-ensconsing Google Glass project (currently being redeveloped), Oculus Rift and Playstation VR headsets. Virtual reality is going mainstream. Anyone who’s seen the demonstrations going out of gaming expo E3 for the last few years know that tangible reality is about to become seemingly plastered with art assets, villains and storytelling. But virtual reality is also becoming increasingly attractive to advertisers, with film content. A recent promotion for Reese Witherspoon vehicle Wild saw users interact with film content. And with VR capturing equipment about to burst into the prosumer market (look to the Nokia OZO), the complete branding of ‘reality’ is about to become commonplace. 

But perhaps the most seismic of changes brought about by the proliferation of increasingly shrinking silicon chips is the omnipresent collection of data. Realities that rely upon the hyperreal – online content, videos, Twitter feeds etc. – are now shaped by the fact that indispensable gadgets collect data on our whereabouts, content preferences and usage patterns. The usual sense of panicked unease at this realisation has been explored and moralised on in the paranoia of the seminal Matrix Trilogy. The mantra “If it’s free, you’re the product” is a pretty solid guide to the state of things. 

This collecting and utilisation of preferences by giant corporate networks may seem insignificant on an individual level, but it simply isn’t. Access to the young taste-making demographic is vital to marketing firm trying to push its latest meme-able monstrosity into the public’s collective conscious. Companies utilise your browsing history to target advertisements. And the likelihood of you engaging with it? Google probably has a better idea than you.

In the beginnings of the information society, there existed only a comparative handful of channels of information, its curation and policing located more obviously in political institutions and social assumptions that needed to be constantly reinforced. Curation of social and cultural experience was carried out at a higher level, at a remove from the individual. Potentially noxious yes, but it also crystallised a sense of community, common understandings and cultural touchstones. Now this is slipping. The personalisation of reality – that of both the real and the hyperreal – atomises and isolates the individual from tangible reality. 

The result? Reinforced ignorance. If we’re constantly presented with what we know, what we know we like, and most importantly what corporations think we’ll want to buy, our horizons will be shrunk by the logable click. Netflix, Youtube and Spotify wring a couple more page views out of you by suggesting media which you’ve already consumed (or which is strikingly similar formally and thematically), and therefore stripped of its cultural and mind-expanding utility. The age of information and media saturation has transformed ignorance into a choice, whilst at the same time obscuring and discouraging the individual from making the active decision to acquire wider knowledge. 

Because media-based culture now exists almost totally transnationally, prejudices are reinforced more easily between what were previously cultural hierarchies. Vertically organised groups defined by factors such as age and income now connect laterally, sealing themselves off from the media consumed by those in categories above and below them. YouTube stars, to whom being ‘unchallenging’ in all aspects is the operative mode for building a global audience of middle class teenagers, to whom the three visible walls of their bedroom is about as far as their thirst for ideas reaches. Twitter ‘stanning’ (‘stalker’ + ‘fan’) is perhaps the most obvious example of what happens when youth culture is almost entirely sealed off from wider, and perhaps wiser, cultural supervision, even as self-expression is increasingly monitored and utilised by parties who can monetize your expressed preferences. 

Does this paint a dystopian picture? That’s up for you to decide. But after recent pronunciations from Intel execs that the pace of chip development may be falling behind Moore’s Law, it seems we may have to wait a good while longer to reach the zenith (or is that nadir?) of the silicon age 

 

How Newsnight lost its teeth

1

Newsnight should always be an uncomfortable experience for someone, but since Jeremy Paxman left the show last year, that someone has all too frequently been his replacement, Evan Davis. In Paxman’s era the show was gladiatorial; we watched it as much for the schadenfreude of seeing his tongue tied victims squirm as we did to be informed. There were of course critics who thought that Paxman’s aggression derailed reasoned discussion, but they were missing the point of Newsnight, a show which always will be more fraught than other debate programs no matter who presents it. Newsnight always will be the most nerve-wracking show on TV for a politician to be invited onto, because it is on every weeknight, meaning that guests can be interrogated on issues their spin doctors have had almost no time to address. Paxman was exactly the right man for this format.

The typical interviewer’s reflex action is to begin with a rather long and cushy introduction, telling the interviewee about themselves, praising their hard work and their successful career. But Paxman knew this kind of introduction wastes time and gives the interviewee the upper hand; he knew the value of concision. He began his grilling of Ed Miliband, one of the cruellest of his career, by asking the would-be Prime Minister “Is Britain full?” This question was brilliant because even though its meaning was perfectly clear, its terseness took Miliband aback, provoking his asinine response, “As in immigration?” by which time the debate was essentially lost before it had begun.

Evan Davis, by contrast, has a talent for stumbling around in search of an opening gambit for minutes before actually beginning his belated, half-hearted attack. Take his interview with Russell Brand for instance – he began it by pointing at Brand’s new book and saying: “It’s a very interesting book and there’s a lot in it and we’ve got a lot to talk about, haven’t we?” While Davis was spending too long saying nothing Brand was already cutting across him, and this was how the next fifteen painful minutes continued. What was especially shocking to any fan of Paxman’s was the bodily contact Brand made with Davis – can you imagine anyone patting Paxman’s thigh mid question?

But Davis can also hammer at a point when he wants to – it’s just unfortunate that the point rarely happens to be the right one. In his appalling interview with Stephen Fry for instance, he persisted in comparing Fry’s destructive, but only self-destructive, cocaine habit to Jimmy Savile’s monstrous crimes. Fry had the look of a high school politics teacher enduring the ramblings of the largest ego in his class.

Oscar Wilde’s definition of a gentleman – someone who is only rude when he means to be – is also an essential quality in the interviewer. There are few faster ways of destroying your public and personal credibility than accidentally insulting your interviewee, but this is what Davis managed to do about once every minute in his interview with Fry. At one point he even asked him to admit he’s not a very good actor. The result of all of which is, Newsnight is still brimming with schadenfreude, but it’s no longer the guests we’re laughing at.

Milestones: silicon implants and modern beauty

0

The rise of accessible plastic surgery procedures in recent decades has fundamentally altered the landscape of human aesthetic ideals. The discovery of silicon as well as a variety of injectables such as Juvéderm and Restylane, have facilitated vital advances in a huge number of medical operations and procedures, yet at the same time created a visual media filled with bodies and faces who’ve seemingly leapt from the glass of a fun house mirror. But proceeding the ceaseless rise of the silicon implant, a name has gone forgotten in the history of this aesthetic revolution.

Esmeralda the dog, the first living recipient of a silicon implant, received her new pair of breasts in the early 1960s. Despite doctors being thrilled with the result, Esmeralda clearly wasn’t feeling her new look, as she chewed her implants out shortly afterwards. Whilst silicon implants have gone on to become the de facto choice for plumping cheeks, butts and whatever else, history unfortunately goes a little silent on what became of Esmeralda. Yet her legacy lives on. She sits at the dawn of a new era, in which that most inaccessible of privileges – beauty – became democratised, and ideas of the individual and self expression were thrown into turmoil.

Within the first few years of Esmeralda’s operation, the first implant surgery was performed on a human being. Their payment for this act of human guinea-pigging? Getting their ears pinned back too. And so as America entered the 1960s proper – the age of advertising and aspirational imagery – the human body itself became a site of materialist anxiety and “self-improvement”. The floodgates were opened, and insecurities came pouring in.

But what about its impact on culture? Silicon has fundamentally changed the way that we look at our bodies. It’s made aesthetic ideals of beauty accessible to all those with a couple of zeros in their bank accounts, but in doing so perhaps it has furthered the divide between rich and poor. In the Victorian period, where physiognomy reigned supreme, your social station was supposedly etched into your god-given features. Anyone who’s seen even a glimpse of The Real Housewives may conclude that the rich certainly do look a little different to the rest of us these days.

But the medium has also become the message. Artists have transformed their bodies into shrines, commentaries and criticism of attainable idealised forms. The club kids, socialites and performance artists have utilised their faces and bodies to drive the concept of ‘beautiful’ far out into the uncanny valley and leave it there. Their physical being itself exposes the oddity of ‘perfection’.

But silicon has also lead to outrageous, fan- tastical aesthetic forms. Instead of attempting to reproduce an idealised human form, body modifications have taken human aesthetics into the realms of make-believe. Subdermal implants place horns, spikes, bolts and bulges in the most unlikely of places, transforming the human body into a fantasy creature of nightmares. Darth Maul may have been a villain a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, but his descendants are apparently walking the earth today, devilish silicon spikes pointing skyward from beneath their scalps.

Yet perhaps what the advent of the cosmetic surgery age really has done is make explicit the true cruelty of beauty. Far from becoming an ideal available to all, aesthetic beauty has remained, and even retreated, into its typically elitist repose. It remains based on concepts of rarity and ‘naturalness’. To be seen to be trying to look ‘beautiful’ is to fail at it – just look at the reaction to any obviously surgically enhanced public figure for evidence of this. And so the dawn of cosmetic surgery has created an age of perpetual discontent. As if we are just like Esmeralda the dog, endlessly chasing her tail. 

Mean girls and scream queens

0

The mixed-to-very-negative response generated by the first few episodes of Scream Queens, a torrent of colourful insults from critics and couch potatoes alike, is difficult to ignore. These dissenters are not some vocal minority, nor can we claim that they are somehow ‘not in on the joke’ – one of the show’s great pleasures is indeed its own cast’s lack of behind-the-curtain self awareness, so don’t expect a series peppered with eye-winking trivia and college kids doubling as horror encyclopaedias. Scream, this ain’t.

Nor is the response a knee–jerk reaction to Scream Queens’ premise or involvements, much as a new Ryan Murphy (Glee, American Horror Story) show about student sororities, big bad bitches and a masked killer on campus might sound groan-worthy. No, as more episodes roll in and the critical tide refuses to turn, that rationalization falls apart just the same. Yet with no easy escape from the criticism, I find myself filled with complete certainty that I am right, they are wrong, and Scream Queens is the best new series to come along in months.

Though Murphy’s attachment has likely spurned more than a few potential viewers, I find little of his other shows’ DNA on offer here. As far removed from American Horror Story’s po-faced spook-driven storytelling as it is Glee’s preachy moral guardianship, Scream Queens is a dark campus comedy following the members and pledges of the Kappa Kappa Tau sorority at Wallace University, led by class-A mean girl Chanel Oberlin (Emma Roberts), as she goes toe-to-toe with wily Dean Cathy Munsch (Jamie Lee Curtis), and a killer donning a Red Devil costume who seems to be exclusively targeting members of KKT. Very 80s, then.

The show’s unstoppable, manic energy is its greatest and its most dangerous asset. The script fires off joke after joke at such pace that it hardly matters if they miss the target; your attention will already have been diverted elsewhere. This is the same approach that kept The LEGO Movie afloat (and made it a wild success) last year, though in that instance they wisely opted for a 100-minute runtime, rather than Scream Queens’ eventual 600.

At this early stage, it’s anyone’s guess whether Murphy and co. can keep it up. The speed hasn’t dragged over the first three episodes, and yet to get through twelve more without faltering seems wishful thinking — the spell hasn’t broken yet, though, and it’s worth the investment in a show which has been such a complete joy to watch, week-on-week.

I can’t say I’m generally someone who harbours guilty pleasures, and I’d be loathe to tag Scream Queens as such. The college murder mystery setting does not make it trashy, and the seemingly shallow, bitchy characters do not make it even slightly vapid or unworthy. I watch the series for its witty, snappy script and dynamite cast, not because it’s a decent way to fill an hour. And I hope that Scream Queens can, against the odds perhaps, continue this superb run through the rest of its first season.

OUSU opposes cuts to student grants

0

A MOTION HAS passed in the first Oxford University Student Union meeting of Michaelmas term, to mandate both the President and Vice-President to publicly oppose the abolition of maintenance grants.

This motion comes in the light of plans announced by George Osborne in the emergency budget this summer to remove student maintenance grants and replace them with increased loans.

The motion also proposes to mandate the OUSU Vice-President to “lobby the University to mitigate the real and perceived financial implications for future students”.

OUSU Council noted that “the change would result in the poorest students graduating with bigger debts than the current system and with more debt than their peers”. OUSU has also stated that the Council believes that “maintenance grants are an important source of support, which encourage students from low-income backgrounds to apply to university and allow them to fully participate in student life once here and that replacing grants with loans is regressive and will increase the level of stress experienced by students from low-income families.”

The motion passed with 65 votes for, four votes against and seven abstentions.

 

OUSU President Becky Howe, who seconded the motion, told Cherwell, “Cutting maintenance grants would not only impact on students from the most disadvantaged backgrounds – it would mean that those taking the biggest maintenance loans would leave university with thousands of pounds’ more debt than their wealthier peers. It’s completely unfair and unacceptable.”

An Oxford University spokesperson commented, “Oxford University offers a very generous package of no-strings-attached financial support including grants and tuition fee reductions. We take into account the level of student debt when setting our annual financial support package.”

It is believed that approximately 16 per cent of Oxford students currently receive maintenance grants, and a survey conducted by OUSU this summer found that 88 per cent of respondents believed that the abolition of maintenance grants “would negatively affect students from low-income backgrounds”.

Christian Amos, a history student from St Catherine’s College, told Cherwell, “personally, I think it’s a good thing that Becky Howe is being mandated to do this. Tuition fees are a separate issue, but maintenance grants really have been an asset to many students from low income backgrounds. It is all very well saying that because you only pay back the maintenance grant when you’re earning that it’s not that big an issue, but now it puts undue financial burden on those most reliant on the maintenance loan – those who previously qualified for the grant.”

Flora Hudson, an undergraduate from Exeter College, told Cherwell, “I think it is very positive that OUSU have been mandated to speak out against cuts to maintenance grants – as representatives for the Oxford student body, it is important that they stand by the students who will be hardest hit by these cuts and so devastatingly impacted by the irresponsible decisions of our government.”

Poaching and periods: in praise of silicon

0

Have you ever tried to poach an egg? To me, an egg’s never better than when it’s been sitting in boiling water for a few minutes, till the whites are wafting about the pan like wispy clouds adrift in a summer sky while the yolk lies in wait behind them: a glob of sun ready to pour out its rays with the prod of a fork or slice of a knife. A good poached egg is the breakfast of champions; it is nothing short of a work of art. But as with all great masterpieces, the poached egg can’t be perfected without practice, perseverance and passion. The egg-poacher must be dedicated to their work, focused on their task, and stoical in the face of culinary adversity. Which is a bit of a shit one really, as ‘focused’ and ‘stoical’ are as far down the list of adjectives to describe my breakfast-foraging morning self as it’s possible to get. 

But have you ever tried to poach an egg with a PoachPod? Around a decade ago my family’s kitchen was graced by the introduction of one of these little silicone rubber wonder-cups which make that perfect egg-wobble achievable with very little effort, and even less skill. You crack an egg into the Pod and rest it on a simmering pan of water for a couple of minutes — hey presto, you’ve got yourself a poached egg. Even in the bleary-eyed confusion of breakfast preparation, with this ace up your sleeve you can’t go wrong. The end product resembles something bizarrely shaped like a tit as the egg moulds itself into the cup.

There’s a pleasing symmetry in the way that silicon products always seem to make a perky set of boobs, whether in the surgery room or on a dinner plate. And while we’re on the theme of bodily silicon insertion and animal ovum, now seems as good a time as any to mention another silicon usage that’s close to my heart: the mooncup. For the unenlightened, the mooncup is essentially a reusable tampon. I thought I’d be hard-pressed to find any silicon uses which elicit anything remotely nearing excitement from me, but it turns out that silicon’s the perfect material for a shitload of awesome purposes, from the banality of egg poaching to the downright vital task of developing safe and environmentally-friendly menstruation products. Who knew?! I never thought I’d say it, but thank God for silicon, and thank God for chemistry.

Of course, my most topical appreciation for silicon has to be its utility in baking. Eggs aren’t the only things that silicon can mould; shove some flour and sugar in there too and you’re halfway to a cakey showstopper à la Tamal from Bake Off.  Last week saw my personal heartthrob (whom I reluctantly share with millions of oth- ers) narrowly miss out on the Great British Bake Off crown to the fabulous face-pulling Nadiya. As a relatively keen amateur baker myself, I can vouch for the advantages of silicon cake and bread moulds, which slide easily away from your freshly baked creation and leave a funky and often otherwise unaccomplishable design. Truly, the sky is the limit. Why you’d want a foot-shaped cake, however, is beyond me. 

And as my surprisingly adulatory inspection of silicon comes to a close, here’s a little message for the freshers out there (another topical tidbit); when setting out to write this piece, I asked a friend of mine who studies chemistry if there were any particular properties of silicon I should know about before putting pen to paper. She told me that silicon is chemically very similar to carbon, but that  a silicon molecule differs by having an extra shell which allows it to expand its octet (the eight electrons in its outer shell) and thus form more bonds with other elements. Essentially, silicon is pimped-out carbon. I’m sure we can all extrapolate some profound metaphorical advice from that information — probably something along the lines of forming bonds with your fellow freshers, building up layers of personality, and standing out compared to other carbon-based life forms, etc etc — but I don’t want to over-egg the pudding (yes, I know — I did just make an egg pun and a baking pun at the same time).

So there we have it: not only is silicon eggsellent (somebody stop me) for poaching stuff, collecting menstrual blood, and baking, it is also great for crafting an elaborate (if half-baked) metaphor about the fresher experience and providing cheesily convenient conclusions to student newspaper articles. Silicon, you have my heart.