Tuesday 24th June 2025
Blog Page 1228

Oxford Guild announces Kanye West as speaker

0

The Oxford Guild has announced that Kanye West will be giving a talk at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History.

At 11pm this evening (March 1st), the Guild’s Facebook page created an event entitled “Kanye West speaks to the Oxford Guild Business Society”, and reported that West would be speaking at the Museum of Natural History tomorrow (March 2nd), at 3pm.

According to the event page, the first batch of tickets will go on sale at midnight, with further releases at 2am, and at 9am tomorrow morning.

Students were encouraged to sign up to a random ballot for tickets. However, the organisers were keen to emphasise that students would be chosen completely at random.

The Guild told Cherwell that as of 12.30am, over 1,800 students had balloted for tickets.

Once selected, students will have two hours in which to buy their tickets before the link expires.

Abbas Kazmi, Chairman of the Oxford Guild, told Cherwell, “We are very excited to be hosting such an inspiring and high profile a speaker as the legendary Kanye West and expect it to be a fascinating and memorable event.

“It is great to see the hard work pay off after having spent many hours negotiating against the odds and keeping things under wraps to secure this event, which is a real coup for the Guild, which I am proud to see continuing to grow from strength to strength, reaching even higher heights and winning ever more national awards and accolades.”

He continued to thank the Guild committee, and went on to say, “This is the first in a series of incredibly high profile speakers the Guild has lined up. We have been working industriously behind the scenes and would recommend you watch this space!”

There has been no word yet on the subject of West’s speech, but the rapper has been outspoken about business in recent years, condeming, among others, Louis Veitton.

West is in the UK for the Brit Awards, where he performed on February 25th, revealing on Twitter last night that his upcoming album is to be titled So Help Me God.

Kazmi also told Cherwell that a full video of the talk will be available, and explained the reasoning behind the event’s ticketing system. “We do not want students to waste their afternoons queuing outside the Union chamber Frewin Court for example, only not to be let in and to be left disappointed. Nor do we want students to ballot and then not turn up leaving empty seats which have been taken by others.”

He also emphasised that only Oxford-registered emails would be valid in the ballot.

Sean O’Neill, of Hertford College, was one of the first students to secure a ticket. He remarked to Cherwell, “I get to be in the same room as Kanye West! This is so great it almost makes me like the Oxford Guild.”

Oliver Johnston-Watt, a member of the general committee, commented, “Aside from the executive, only two other committee members knew about this. When the first e-mail came in I thought it was some kind of joke but with Kanye being in the UK at the moment for the Brits it all started to make sense.

He remarked that it was “absolutely outrageous for any student society to bring in a speaker like Kanye West.

“Clearly,” he continued, “the Oxford Guild mean business.”

The University should not neglect OxHub

0

On behalf of the whole team at the Oxford Hub, I was very pleased to read the front page article and editorial written by Cherwell today on the Oxford Hub’s funding cuts, and am thankful for all the kind comments of support offered by students. However, I would like to take this opportunity to respond to what the University spokesperson has said and highlight some further points.

The University spokesperson claims, “It was always made clear that this money came from funds that were strictly time limited.” I would like to clarify that while it was clear that the Van Houten fund which funded us was time limited, it was also suggested by the Vice-Chancellor that we should fall into the Academic Administration Division budget. Despite conversations on this issue since September 2014, those budget holders have informed us that we will not be receiving core funding from them, and that they are currently unable to offer funding from anywhere else. The Hub’s work is unique, and while we whole heartedly agree that other areas of student support are of the utmost importance, such as Disabled Student Allowance, Access and the UNIQ summer school, the Hub addresses different but equally important issues.

The OxHub provides training and support in setting up and carrying out community volunteering projects, which is not the focus of any other body in the University. This is an opportunity for students to engage with real issues, developing skills to be citizens of a socially minded world. It has been shown that people who engage with volunteering are happier and more employable. The University is known to have a notoriously difficult relationship with the City of Oxford, (which the recent tensions around Port Meadow highlight further), but what better view to the student engagement with their local community can there be than students giving up time to visit the elderly at Isis House, tutor children in everything from Maths to environmental issues, volunteer at the Food Bank or support those who are homeless on our streets?

I would also like to contest the spokesperson’s references to “duplication” of activities. We are in continuous conversation with OUSU and, when I met with their Vice-President for Charities and Communities last week, we agreed that none of what we do is significantly similar and we are planning to collaborate on training sessions next term. Furthermore, while the university spokesperson suggests that our work is similar to that of other university groups, the Hub is used as their go-to partner to support Lloyds and Moritz-Heyman scholars to complete their required volunteering hours – we receive separate pockets of funding to support these scholars – which indicates their clear acknowledgement that the Hub is the main provider of student volunteering opportunities in Oxford, and has been shown to do so very effectively for the last seven years.

Allegations of homophobia at Cellar

0

Two gay Oxford students were the victims of homophobic abuse at The Cellar nightclub on Thursday 26th February, after they were seen kissing on the dance floor.

Both students have requested to be identified solely by their first name.

Sacha, one of the victimised students, explained to Cherwell, “I was dancing on the main dance floor, and then me and this guy went to the other room, where there are a few tables and seats. We sat in a corner by a table and started kissing.

“A man, who was roughly forty five years old, tapped me on the shoulder. From the minute I got tapped on the shoulder, I knew it was going to be something homophobic. I was expecting it in a way.”

The man reportedly said to Sacha, “What the fuck are you doing?”, to which Sacha replied, “I’m kissing.” The man then told Sacha and Josh, the other student involved, that “This is not a gay club”, prompting the two students to stand up.

Sacha explained that at this point, “I just saw that it [the conversation] would degenerate, so I went to the bar and looked helplessly at the guy standing behind the bar. Then a strong, muscular man joined in. He was much more aggressive than the other man; he was shouting insults at us and threatened to punch us. My friend didn’t want to back down. We weren’t going to let this go.”

The man who had been shouting homophobic insults at the gay couple then purportedly head-butted Josh. Sacha elucidated, “He just went for him. It wasn’t strong enough to make him bleed or break his nose or anything, but he went flying back, and we were both in shock afterwards.

“You don’t really realise to what extent something is shocking or intolerable until the next morning – we tried to carry on as if everything was normal. We went back to the main room, and started dancing. We kissed again, and this is when we were approached by a bouncer, who asked us to leave.”

Allegedly, the bouncer asked the students to leave as they had been kissing in the middle of the club. Sacha recounted to Cherwell how the bouncer said to him and Josh, “I’m not looking for trouble, but you might make some people angry. You’re provoking other people.”

However, Tim Hopkins, the Venue Manager at The Cellar, denied that the couple were asked to leave, saying, “The students said they would leave anyway. The Cellar is a forward thinking place, we’re not homophobic. This was probably a bit of a misunderstanding. The bouncers did chuck out someone who was uncomfortable with the two guys kissing.

“People can kiss in The Cellar. Our policy on kissing is that it’s absolutely fine, but we tell people to hold it down if it’s any more than kissing. If you’re gay and you want to kiss in The Cellar, you can. It’s a case by case situation – if there’s a heterosexual couple in the corner, and it gets a bit frisky, we’ll ask them to calm down a bit.”

Hopkins reiterated, “We wouldn’t kick out some gay people for kissing in The Cellar. We’re a friendly music venue that embraces all walks of life and cultures and whatever. We don’t discriminate at The Cellar.”

After leaving the nightclub, Sacha told Cherwell, “I was so fuming, looking for someone to complain to. I wanted to go back in.” However, the bouncers refused Sacha entry. Sacha continued, “I must have looked too angry or violent or gay or whatever.”

Describing his anger at the bouncer’s treatment of him and his friend, Sacha said, “It was absolutely insane. The Cellar is probably one of the most promiscuous, incestuous places in Oxford.” He further added that he had believed the nightclub to be, “Alternative and open-minded”.

Former Merton LGBTQ rep Alex Beecham commented, “I was angered to hear that two friends of mine had been subjected to such appalling homophobia in The Cellar and by their staff, and was surprised as I have often seen same-sex couples kissing there and have myself considered The Cellar to be one of my favourite places in Oxford. Many in Oxford’s LGBTQ community will avoid that club to its detriment unless the management reacts appropriately to ensure that we do not have to fear the threat of violence and intimidation.”

As his College’s LGBTQ rep, Sacha posted about the incident on the College LGBTQ reps Facebook group. He commented, “I was completely lost, with no idea what to do. Reactions from friends in College were extremely supportive, and on the wider LGBTQ reps Facebook group – they were great as well.”

The President of the Oxford University LGBTQ Society, Otamere Guobadia, expressed outrage at the news, telling Cherwell, “To be a minority, even in Oxford, our self-proclaimed ‘bastion of progression’ is to be in constant vigilance. There are the daily microagressions that feed into wider prejudices and contribute to othering and alienation, but then there are these very real very tangible acts of violence; acts that threaten our bodily integrity and what little sense of welcome we have in society.

“My college [Univ] flew the rainbow flag for the first time in its centuries long history today, and yet under these spires we are still being denied our right to determine their own lives and loves. We will not let this go. Our bodies have a right to take up space, and own who we are in public spheres, and to say that this is horrendous is an understatement. Fuck queerphobia and fuck establishments that perpetuate it.”

Hopkins told Cherwell, “If they’d [Sacha and Josh] like to have a chat with me personally, I’d be happy to do that”, further adding that The Cellar would review CCTV footage of the night to assess the claims of homophobic assault.

 

Review: Fifty Shades of Grey

0

★★☆☆☆
Two Stars

Nothing says “Happy Valentine’s Day” like taking your beloved to watch some soft-core mainstream pornography about floggers, butt-plugs, and cable ties. As such, the cinema was jam-packed with dozens of gushing couples (and awkward third wheels) all gagging to see the big screen adaptation of E. L. James’ explosive erotic bestseller.

Christian Grey is a man who doesn’t “make love”; in his own words, he “fucks… hard”. The big question is whether Anastasia Steele – poor, helpless English Literature student Ana – can resist falling for this lusty dreamboat millionaire (hint: she falls… hard). When her journalist friend catches the flu, Ana steps in by interviewing enigmatic businessman Christian Grey (after nonsensically face-planting on his floor). The film dives straight into this painfully awkward first meeting, in which Ana gives Christian an uneasy amount of sass – which he likes, funnily enough. Turning the interview on Ana, who has captivated his beady eyes, Christian asks her which novelist first inspired her love for English literature – Hardy, Austen, or Brontë. She responds, obviously, with the sauciest, riskiest author of the three – Mr Thomas Hardy – and this answer, naturally, pleases Christian further. She has passed his test. They must be together. But there will be a bizarre snag to their relationship. He doesn’t “do” romance. If Ana is to be with him, she must submit to his intense S&M lifestyle, and his “Red Room of Pain” – sorry, “of Pleasure”. First, however, he must draw up a special contract for her, with some very peculiar demands. We all know how it goes. If you don’t, you must have been living under a rock for the past few years. Seriously.

As Christian begins stalkishly attempting to buy her affection (literally – he purchases her an Audi R8), Ana begins to question whether she can truly adapt to Christian’s sexual practices. The two would-be lovers engage in a weird game of cat and mouse. After repeatedly warning her to stay away, the king of mixed messages then tells Ana that he cannot live without her (men, right?). Of course, Christian can’t help his involuntary proclivity for forcing himself upon his sexual partners at unexpected intervals – he had a difficult childhood and unresolved mummy issues. The film never really decides whether it is promoting or shaming BDSM – what Christian refers to rather obliquely as his “physical pursuits”. It struggles to find a balance between shamelessly stripping Dakota Johnson’s Ana to complete nudity for at least half of her screen time, and conforming to that age-old custom of mainstream cinema whereby men don’t have penises – or, at least, they must never, ever be shown.

For a man with so many toys, Jamie Dornan’s Christian Grey is not nearly as playful as he should be. We’re forced to accept this emotionally brutish but good-natured alpha male because he has enough cash to throw around and a chiseled face to which girls just can’t say no. A wittier, more self-conscious script would have helped. Though the audience reaction from the cinema was enjoyably electric (there were regular cheers, wolf-whistles, and smutty chuckles), it couldn’t help but feel a little slow, a little weak, a little grey.
Sam Taylor-Johnson just hasn’t managed to set a singular tone for this picture, which would have learnt well how to handle its slippery subject matter from films such as Secretary and Nymphomaniac. With adrenaline-pumping rides in Grey’s helicopter and glider, you’d expect the plot to take off a little better, but everything felt abruptly cut short – as if the entire film was constantly anticipating a string of sequels. The ending, for one thing, which was as cruelly teasing as Mr Grey himself, drew exasperated groans from the audience. In one of the better and funnier scenes, Ana and Christian negotiate the particulars of her contract, and she tells him to scratch out “anal fisting”. I should thank this quip for inspiring my titillating final line because, ultimately, this film feels a little bit ham-fisted.

Review: Inherent Vice

0

★★★★★

Five Stars

So the world is crazy, but is it bad? In his manic new stoner-cum-detective flick Inherent Vice, based on the book by Thomas Pynchon, that’s a question contemplated by director Paul Thomas Anderson. It would be inaccurate to say that the movie has politely divided opinion so much as it has brutally polarised it, with some lauding it as an embryonic cult classic in the vein of The Big Lebowski and others dismissing it as a self-indulgent, nonsensical mess. Just like the world, it’s certainly crazy. But it sure as hell ain’t bad – in fact, it’s brilliant.

The setting is the fictional Gordita Beach, California, home to the pot-smoking private detective, Larry ‘Doc’ Sportello (Joaquin Phoenix). A sense of paranoia is omnipresent, almost a supporting character so heavily does it suffuse the film from its very start. But while Doc is rarely without joint or laughing gas in hand, the kind of paranoia Inherent Vice revels in isn’t just a bad case of stoner’s jitters – it’s deep existential anxiety, a generation’s sense of its coming end. The film is funny, of course, but generational insecurity forms its backdrop. This is 1970, a year after the Manson murders, and hippies are now the enemy within, distrusted by Nixon’s ‘silent majority’. That fear of the other is perfectly captured by Josh Brolin in his show-stealing performance as hippie-hating detective, Bigfoot Bjornsen. The scenes with Brolin and Phoenix are in fact some of the film’s best and deserve to be savoured, so strong is their comedic chemistry.

Part of the trouble with Inherent Vice is that its story defies easy description. Its plot is as thick and fruity as the smoke from Doc’s dubious-looking roll-ups, and this might be why many have been immune to its charms. The film begins with the return of Doc’s ‘ex-old-lover’, Shasta Fey (Katherine Waterston) who, alas for poor Doc, has come not to rekindle old flames, but instead to seek his help. Her new lover, real estate magnate Mickey Wolffman, is being targeted in an abduction plot by his wife and Shasta is at a loss. In what follows, Doc doesn’t so much actively sniff out leads as go wherever the wind takes him – usually somewhere or something to do with the mysterious ‘Golden Fang’. There are also Nazis, Californian surf-bands, and Ouija boards.

Pynchon’s novels are perhaps not the most amenable to cinematic adaptation. Inherent Vice is, however, generally recognised as one of his more accessible works and translates well to cinema, with the film rightfully earning an Oscar nomination for Best Adapted Screenplay. With a truly stellar cast at his disposal, Anderson is able to do justice to Pynchon’s motley set of characters: from the mercurial Phoenix as Doc to its large supporting cast, the film certainly isn’t lacking in quality (one of the film’s more minor figures and on screen for at most a few minutes is played by The Wire’s Michael K. Williams). This is, after all, where as a director he traditionally excels: from Magnolia to The Master, from Boogie Nights to There Will Be Blood, Anderson is highly adept at character portrait.

Despite its mixed reception, it is a film which will acquire popularity as it ages. One sexually-charged scene with Katherine Waterson and Joaquin Phoenix has the potential to rival The Graduate’s, “Mrs. Robinson, you’re trying to seduce me,” for sheer carnal energy. The movie’s soundtrack and direction are also well orchestrated. Repeat viewings will be craved.

“Don’t worry. Thinking comes later,” Doc implores Shasta in the film’s opening scenes. Audiences would be wise to abide by those words when watching. Inherent Vice isn’t something that should be fought against; just go along and enjoy the ride. And don’t be too greedy with the laughing gas.

Oxford study finds depression linked to violence

0

The University of Oxford’s Department of Psychiatry has released a study revealing that those diagnosed with depression are around three times more likely than the rest of the general population to commit violent crimes.

Violent crime was defined by the study as a conviction for homicide or attempted homicide, aggravated or common assault, robbery, arson, and sexual offences.

Researchers uncovered that 3.7 per cent of men and 0.5 per cent of women who were identified as clinically depressed committed a violent crime, in comparison with 1.2 per cent of men and 0.2 per cent of women in the general population.

However, the study, funded by the Wellcome Trust, was keen to emphasise that the overwhelming majority of depressed people are neither violent nor criminal and that the study does not seek to stigmatise those with mental health afflictions.

Researchers tracked the medical records and conviction rates of 47,158 people in Sweden diagnosed with depression during a three year period. They then proceeded to compare the data with the records of another 898,454 people, who had no history of diagnosed depression.

Achim Wolf, a research assistant in Oxford’s Department of Pyschiatry and somebody who worked on the study, told Cherwell, “First and foremost, our findings are destigmatising, emphasising that the vast majority of people with depression are not violent. However, the fact that there is an increased risk should encourage patients, their carers, and doctors to discuss and address any violent thoughts and behaviour patterns. Depression is an increasingly important public health issue.

“Studying its relationship with violence could help us better understand how to prevent violent crime and possibly reduce other adverse outcomes.”

He continued to discuss whether doctors’ guidelines or public policy should take into account this potential risk of violence, commenting, “Doctors routinely assess risks of suicide and self-harm in patients with depression. This is not currently done for violence. Our findings suggest that clinical guidelines should consider violence risk assessment in some patients.”

Paul Farmer, the Chief Executive of mental health charity Mind, commented, “Depression is the most common mental health problem, affecting one in ten people in England.

“The vast majority of people who experience depression pose no risk to others. In fact, they are far more likely to take their own life or self-harm than be violent towards others, as this research clearly shows.

“The link between dangerous behaviour and mental health is often exaggerated in the media, which fuels public misunderstanding and makes people fearful to talk about mental health issues. There is still a tremendous amount of stigma about mental health problems which can make it hard for people to come forward and seek the help they need.”

Pembroke Porter Appreciation Week

0

Pembroke College has passed a motion to hold a ‘Porter Appreciation Week’ from Monday 2nd to Friday 6th March, in line with the recent trend of JCRs trying harder to appreciate university staff.

During this week, the JCR will give the porters a card and present, alongside organising a secret complement box, a song-orientated honouring and a ‘Porter Poem competition’.

The motion was proposed by undergraduate Dan Bowen in an attempt to recognise “that Hilary must not be a fun time for our porter friends due to weather and drunken students”. He also wanted to rectify the “hard time” that the porters have been having recently, “mainly from members of the JCR”.

The motion declared, “The JCR believes we need to honour our porters to the highest degree. The JCR members often feel like they want to thank them, be it by gift or in words, but (being mainly British) JCR members feel too awkward to do so. The JCR further believes this would be a good opportunity for members of the JCR to make up with or thank the porters if they did something especially kind.”

The motion passed with two amendments; one being that a spending cap of £150 be introduced and the second to make this a ‘Pembroke Porter Appreciation Week’ as opposed to a day.

Pembroke JCR President Ben Nabarro commented, “The JCR understands how much the porters do for students and how integral they are to the student community. The JCR’s reaction has been almost uniformly positive and this is indicative of the number of people who, at some point or another, have been helped, cheered up, and generally looked out for by the college porters.

“I’m really glad to see so many in the JCR engaging with the week and I think it’s right we, as students, show our gratitude to all members of college staff who go over and above what they have to for students.”

Undergraduate Ste Sczcepanek told Cherwell, “I think it’s a good idea because it’s so easy to take the porters for granted or to underappreciate what they do for their job, so it’s a good chance to let them know that we appreciate them.”

However, others were quick to raise the issue of why this specific week is needed at all, with fresher Charlotte Lanning commenting, “I think that it’s a really nice idea, but I also think it’s quite superficial – why do we have a specific week to appreciate them when we should be being nice and respectful all of the time?”

Somerville College also passed a motion this week making all members of College support staff honorary members of the JCR. The motion initially proposed the instatement of bar staff Callum McGuire and Josh Ramli-Davies as honorary members, but was amended during the meeting to include all support staff at the college.

Asked about the passing of the motion, McGuire commented, “It’s great! Pretty sure Sean [McIntyre, who proposed the initial motion], meant it as a joke when he proposed it but if it turned out as something positive between staff and students that’s awesome.”

LMH’s JCR has likewise made more of an effort to appreciate its scouts by organising coffee mornings between college staff and students.

Oriel College dismisses contractor over harassment claims

0

Oriel College has dismissed one of its contractors after students allegedly experienced intimidation and sexual harassment from builders working on a site in their Third Quad.

Oriel College’s Domestic Bursar, Kevin Melbourne, told Cherwell, “It was recently brought to the College’s attention that some of our College members had experienced or witnessed inappropriate remarks and behaviour by a contractor working on the Rhodes Building redevelopment.

“Oriel does not tolerate inappropriate behaviour of any kind and as soon as this issue was brought to our attention we took immediate action, removing the perpetrator from the premises within the hour. The College made it clear to the main contractor that this behaviour is utterly unacceptable, that it should not recur, and that any future instances would be dealt with very severely.

“All further reports have been investigated and to the best of our knowledge were historical instances that took place prior to the contractor being removed.

“The College has a zero-tolerance policy on sexual harassment. We have urged all students to report any instances of unacceptable behaviour immediately to the Junior Deans or a member of the senior management team so that appropriate and speedy action can be taken.”

The refurbishment of the Rhodes Building, which currently houses fresher undergraduates, has been an ongoing project since June 2013 and was due to be finished in September 2014. While all the accommodation was finished in time for Michaelmas term, work by external contractors has been ongoing through Michaelmas and Hilary on seminar rooms and a new gym on the ground floor, as well as on landscaping Oriel’s Third Quad.

One second year female undergraduate commented to Cherwell, “In Michaelmas term, I experienced a number of incidents of harassment. The strangest was when one of the builders sang a song about my ass as I walked by. On a separate occasion, a group of them discussed my body loudly within earshot. I’ve lost count of the number of times they’ve whistled at me.

“As I live opposite the building site, this became a daily occurrence. I think I’ve been conditioned over the years to ignore street harassment but in hindsight I wish I’d reported it earlier. I finally decided to say something when I heard that a large number of girls had been subjected to this disgusting behaviour. The College has dealt with it extremely well.”

Another student, who also reported her concerns to College, commented, “Some of the builders working on Oriel’s Third Quad – one in particular – have demonstrated inappropriate behaviour towards myself and other female students whilst working in Third Quad, but mostly while taking breaks on Oriel Street.

“It is extremely uncomfortable to walk down there at the moment as they stand by the side and often look you up and down and mutter inappropriate comments. Living in Third Quad makes it pretty hard to avoid (particularly the staring). I have reported this to College and they are taking it very seriously and are trying to do something about it.”

The JCR President of Oriel, Kit Owens, commented to Cherwell, “I am very pleased with the quick and decisive response the college made when it became aware of reports of harassment. It sends a clear message that this sort of behaviour is unacceptable and will not be tolerated in our community.”

Exeter College bottled by Jesus student

0

Police were called after members of Jesus College allegedly caused damage to Exeter College property on February 13th. A student from Jesus College threw a glass projectile at Exeter, breaking a window.

The governing body at Jesus College was unimpressed by the behaviour of the students involved. The Jesus College Dean, Professor Katrin Kohl, sent an email to students claiming that the throwing of glass objects at Exeter College “formed part of an unofficial event that is evidently considered by some to be a part of Jesus College tradition”.

The email continued, “The behaviour not only brought the College into disrepute but led to damage of Exeter College property. It will be self-evident that it was also extremely dangerous and could have led to serious personal injury or worse, and could have jeopardised the careers of the students involved in the aggressive behaviour.”

The incident allegedly occurred during the ‘Turl Street Dash’, the “unofficial event” referred to in the email from the Dean. The Turl Street Dash is thought to be a centuries-old tradition which serves as a form of competition between rival colleges Exeter and Jesus.

When asked to describe the event, a Jesus undergraduate told Cherwell, “The Dash is a noble tradition dating back nearly eight centuries (before Jesus College, and indeed the bicycle, was invented).

“In more recent times, it’s a very well known fact that T.E. Lawrence would drink a carafe of port each year, then ride his camel around the RadCam, up Turl Street and all the way to Turl Street Kitchen. He once listed the Dash as the single most important piece of mental and physical preparation he completed for the Capture of Aqaba in 1917.”

Participants usually have to run or cycle after drinking copious amounts of alcohol. In recent years, both Exeter and Jesus have banned students from participating in the Dash following rowdy behaviour and reports of injuries, with Exeter locking the gates to the College.

Usually, there is a quite a large turnout in the College bar prior to the race, where a ‘Mr and Mrs Jesus’ competition takes place. No cameras or phones are allowed, as specified in an email circulated before each year’s competition. Traditionally, six freshers are encouraged to consume alcohol before performing embarassing tasks, which, in the past, have included acting out as many sexual positions as possible in a limited period of time.

Following the glass throwing incident, Jesus College has deemed gathering for the Dash “an offence”, saying it will work with the JCR to avoid such events taking place in future.

Speaking of the incident, Professor Katrin Kohl, the Dean of Jesus, told Cherwell, “The Turl Street Dash was banned some years ago because of the danger of escalation. Jesus College very much regrets that one of its students threw glass in such a context, and regards the reported behaviour as entirely unacceptable.

“The student identified has been appropriately punished and has written a letter of apology to Exeter College. The JCR has been reminded that the Turl Street Dash is banned and has been told that the ban will be enforced should there be a similar gathering in the future.”

The Jesus College JCR President announced in their most recent OGM that if there were any Turl Street Dash participants in future years, they would be fined by College.

A police spokesperson commented, “We are investigating the incident as criminal damage. A glass was thrown at the window, smashing it.” Police have not confirmed whether anyone has been charged for the offence.

Another Jesus student, who wished to remain anonymous, commented, “The Turl Street Dash is a bit of a joke – no-one takes it seriously. I think that the person involved didn’t really understand that it was meant to be ironic and got a bit over excited while trying to impress the older boys.”

Oxford’s Northern Gateway causes controversy

0

Plans for 500 new homes in North Oxford have been presented to the public by a group made up of St John’s, Worcester, and property development group Kier Ventures Ltd.

According to the developers, the development would include up to 500 new homes, a hotel with 120 to 180 bedrooms, a 90,000 square metre business complex, shops, cycle routes, and public spaces. Construction could begin as early as 2017.

The development group, known as the Northern Gateway Consortium, held an introductory consultation event on February 20th. The land in question is mostly owned by St John’s and Worcester, with some plots owned by Merton and Oxford City Council. However, Merton and Oxford City Council are not part of the consortium.

Oxford’s Northern Gateway, the area where the development is being proposed, is immediately north-east of Summertown and is flanked by the A34. Some of the land is currently marked as Green Belt land, and would need to be reclassified before building could commence.

The Oxford Mail also reports that plans for a new primary school may be considered.

The Northern Gateway Consortium revealed to Cherwell, “There is a lot of work to be done between now and submitting our outline planning application. We will be speaking to Oxford City Council, Oxfordshire County Council, the Highways Authority, and a range of other consultees, including local residents and local groups, over the coming months.

“There are a number of factors that could influence the timing of our outline planning application submission. Flexibility has been built into our programme to allow us to respond to the Northern Gateway Area Action Plan adoption programme and other strategic consultations.”

Some local groups have voiced opposition to the move, however. Helen Marshall, the director of the Campaign to Protect Rural England Oxfordshire, told the Oxford Mail, “Traffic and air pollution in the area are already atrocious.

“The proposed development will make things worse. We are also concerned about the five storey buildings proposed on higher ground within the Northern Gateway area, which could affect Port Meadow’s protected views and spoil the rural character of Wolvercote.

“Coming hot on the heels of Oxford University’s commitment to do better following the lessons learned from the Castle Mill accommodation blocks, it is worrying to see that St John’s and Worcester colleges are still not giving adequate consideration to the visual impact of their buildings.”

Ann Duncan, the Green Party candidate for the Oxford East constituency in this year’s elections, claimed, “Regarding the Northern Gateway development project in particular, we would support some (but not all) of the development proposed for the area, providing that the genuine concerns around traffic and flood risk are properly addressed. The development should focus on social housing rather than ‘employment growth’ as this would lead to even more housing demand. As the traffic and flood risk issues limit this development, there wouldn’t be a need to build on the green belt here.

“We need to solve Oxford’s housing crisis with a range of solutions, as well as building new social homes. Oxford has over 800 empty homes but the Council has only agreed to use compulsory purchase powers twice. Better use of these powers could bring many of these empty homes back into use.”

Kevin Dixon from the Consortium, added, “We are very much at the start of the planning process, however we recognise that many residents are concerned about traffic and infrastructure in North Oxford. Over the next few months, before we submit a planning application, we will be outlining how we will improve local infrastructure and the steps we will be taking to ensure that our proposals are sustainable.

“Following our initial consultation last week, we are now analysing the feedback received and we will present our outline plans to the community later this year, before we submit an application. Our proposals will reflect the City Council’s Core Strategy and Northern Gateway Area Action Plan, as well as comments from the local community. We are committed to promoting a world class development which responds positively to the context of North Oxford, integrates fully with its neighbouring communities and delivers substantial benefits for visitors to the city as well as existing residents and businesses.”

The project’s official timeline implies that the Consortium hopes to submit an outline planning application by July or August, which will be considered by planning authorities. One of the first public consultations took place on 21st November 2013 in the form of a Wolvercote Neighbourhood Forum public meeting.

Government approval for the plans was sought in October last year. Leader of the Oxford City Council Bob Price explained at the time, “The Northern Gateway development is a rare opportunity to provide significant space within the city for the innovation and knowledge-based sector so important to Oxford’s economy.

“It also offers the opportunity to provide additional new homes and facilities in a thriving new community.”

OUSU’s Rent and Accommodation Officer, Danny Waldman, told Cherwell, “As OUSU was keen to highlight recently in the Castle Mill debate, Oxford is the most expensive city to live in: building more housing can only be a good thing from that perspective. Obviously, this won’t change the Council’s 3,000 ‘living out’ student cap, but more housing means cheaper rent generally.

“I can’t say to what extent the consortium will deal with the traffic issues, but I’d be confident that they won’t unreasonably dismiss a strong concern of local residents if this comes out in their public inquiry.

“I’d also hazard a guess that they’ll double-check any Environmental Impact Surveys for their larger buildings overlooking Port Meadow…”