Friday 10th April 2026
Blog Page 1240

Advice to potential allies of the LGTBQ community

0

The struggle for LGBTQ liberation is not over in Oxford. LGBTQ students face verbal abuse, violence and marginalisation. As the OUSU LGBTQ Campaign, we’d love to have as many allies as possible. With your support, we can tackle the everyday homophobia, transphobia and biphobia that contribute to the exclusion facing LGBTQ students here. To that end, here’s some advice about how to be a good ally to the LGBTQ community.

Firstly, whenever you feel safe doing so, try to call out homophobia, biphobia and transphobia. If you can call out your peers calmly and fi rmly, you play your part in creating a more welcoming environment for LGBTQ students, an environment free of homophobic and transphobic abuse – and that includes abuse that’s dressed up as a joke or irony.

Secondly, take care with your own language. Failing to refer to people’s gender and sexuality in the terms they themselves use betrays a lack of respect for their identity. The golden rule here is not to make assumptions. Asking someone what their pronouns are (i.e. whether someone uses he/she/they etc) is way better than assuming you know. Understandably, the plethora of identities that all go under the label of LGBTQ can seem confusing, but the information is out there and it shouldn’t be up to LGBTQ people to explain themselves all the time. Not all women who date women are lesbians; not all queer people are gay; not all transgender people have a binary gender identity.

Honestly, it’s not that complicated, and getting informed will make you more confi dent in respecting people’s identities. Thirdly, check how you come across in conversations about gender and sexuality with LGBTQ people. We get that you’re fascinated by us, but try not to make people feel like you’re interrogating them and avoid asking personal questions to people you’ve only just met. Don’t ask transgender people about their genitals. Don’t quiz bisexual people about their sex life. Don’t ask lesbians or gay men who the man or woman in their relationship is (there isn’t one, that’s kind of the point). It can make people really uncomfortable. Some people might be ok with these questions, but as a rule it’s best to avoid asking things like that.

Equally, don’t tell us you knew straight away what our identity was, and don’t tell us you never would have guessed. That shows that you’ve swallowed the stereotypes and measured us up against them. You might mean it as a compliment, but it can actually be really confusing and offensive.

Don’t labour the point about how totally fine you are with our being LGBTQ. That’s how it should be – we won’t be handing out any cookies. Don’t resent people for not telling you straight away. Plenty of LGBTQ people are too worried to speak up about their identity, and it’s unfair to make them feel bad for not doing so. Keep in mind that not everyone can come out, since it’s impossible to know whether or not it’s safe. Overall, just think about how what you say might come across, and try to avoid the whole Spanish Inquisition vibe.

Lastly, it’s really important to challenge heteronormativity as well as more overt homophobia. Heteronormativity is basically the social norm of assuming that everyone is straight and that being straight is the normal way to be. With that in mind, try not to assume the gender identity or sexuality of people you meet.

Avoiding heteronormativity is especially important for those involved in other liberation initiatives and activism. For example, often in mainstream feminism the voices of LGBTQ people are left out. There can be a lot of focus on a gender as a binary, which erases the more complex nature of gender identity. Be careful about casual cissexism – don’t equate having a vagina to being a woman or having a penis to being a man. Be mindful of the struggles of other marginalised groups and recognise how diff erent aspects of a person’s identity can intersect and eff ect the way they experience oppression.

Being a good ally can be difficult. It takes time to find out about LGBTQ identities and struggles. It takes confidence to stand up to discrimination. In the end, though, it’s really worth it because you can make such a difference to people’s lives. While you should take pride in your values, always remember that LGBTQ voices must be at the heart of the movement. Here at the OUSU LGBTQ Campaign we really hope you take this all on. Thank you for contributing to a more inclusive and friendly university.

A view from the cheap seat

0

★★★★★★

Under duress, I have been forced to write this (hostage-situation-biased) review of the performance. This really was the best performance I have ever seen of Hamlet. Ever. I promise.

The fact that there was absolutely no set whatsoever was really great because it meant I could focus on the fact that there was no Hamlet. It certainly didn’t make it look like they’d left out a hugely important part of the aesthetic experience and it definitely didn’t make it look in any way shit. This aspect of the show made a hugely convincing point about consumer culture and the environment.

The most interesting aspect of the performance was the lack of the character Hamlet. Most scenes were complicated by the removal of the dominant male. Hamlet’s madness is created by the characters around him, but can Hamlet be mad if he doesn’t exist?

Most interestingly, the ending challenged our preconceptions about death – the characters had plotted to kill the absent figure of Hamlet. Hypontast Productions has really left us wondering about whether being alive is a necessary requirement for being killed, opening up the question of where the meta- phoric nature of our language leads us (the answer presumably is death).

What I loved about the production was its length. They really managed to race through some scenes and the play overall lasted just over an hour, which is the perfect length for any student drama. Fundamentally this per- formance challenges all of our preconcep- tions about theatre and about ourselves, not one is left untouched by the performance’s depth.

Should there be a main character? Should there be any characters? What is a character? Am I a character? Am I a person? Some people thought Hamlet was alright how Shakespeare had written it, but seeing this production they have got it all wrong – what he should have done is removed the main character and ramped the pace up. 

Review: Conjure

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

The lights are somewhat dim, the setting bleak and paltry – a dump-yard, literally. Add the trio of actresses mumbling and fidgeting on-stage to eerie sound effects, and you begin to wonder just what lunacy Adam Leonard’s Conjure has in store.

Its premise seems straightforward – four young adults caught in a messy situation when one of them, after convincing the rest to take LSD, manages to crack his head open. The remaining three have to decide what to do with him, given what they risk back at the shadily un- named ‘home’ if they break curfew, reveal drug use, or simply bring back an injured friend (Aaron, played by James Mace).

Very rapidly though, the stakes steepen, as Leonard’s sensitive writing explores how we construct (and destroy) identities more often than not forged under pain or in defence. The chemistry between the actresses – Katie, played by Rachael Coll; Jess, played by Katty Cowles; and Shona, played by Chloe Wall – combined with Leonard’s snappy dialogues palliate the inevitable opening night stumbles. Admittedly, as the girls wonder what to do with their uncon- scious friend, their movements and exchange stagnate.

The emotional pitch will suddenly skyrocket, or drop to casualness. On the other hand, there’s evidently been careful thought in the blocking, maybe even a statement about psychology made: Aaron’s problematic body is out of sight, but still polarises the on-stage characters’ at- tention. Aaron himself is sat on a dishwasher (no spoilers but it’s an incongruous, effective symbol), occasionally narrating or reacting. Yes, there’s some weird, slightly clichéd discourse about how world news is boring and unrelatable. But overall, the sparks of wry, dry wit make Aaron’s comments welcome comical pockets in the steadily darkening play. Leonard develops this clever speech arrangement, giving his three female characters singular, separate mono- logues. These ‘anecdotes’ are pretty chilling, and give insight as to the play’s descent into drama. Jess’s story glimpses at how communities are breached by individual desires and resentments (much like the dynamic unfolding on-stage); Shona’s glances at communication warped by virtual messaging, at distrust and violence. Katie’s is definitely the freakiest, and Coll gives it her most wide-eyed, quivering stage presence – presumably about a trapped fox Katie tries to ‘free’, it’s about pain, mercy, isolation, and what we can’t say.

This isn’t to say the actresses don’t begin with off moments in tone or body placement as the issue of their half-brained friend seems to lead to a dramatic moot point. The stage space remains largely unused – until Katie, having made her enmity and torturous intentions to- wards Aaron clear, lunges at his wounded head and presses down. Katie’s character is perhaps Leonard’s finest: the plot’s dark turn pivots on the moment her vendetta reveals itself. Her reasonable, pragmatic front morphs into real jealousy and domineering, while her invective against Aaron questions the notion of domestic terrorism. Borderline psychopathic, she’s a key piece in an equally well-constructed dynamic between personalities, where the seeming underdog (self-professed ‘loser’ Shona) takes the upper hand with fiercely repressed resentment.

All in all, Conjure is a promising piece of writ- ing by Leonard, and the cast does honourably by it, if not always justly. Mace, though he started off strong as the detached, quipping observer, falls a little flat by the play’s end, paling once he interacts directly with the rest of cast. Cowles, in her soliloquy, confirms herself as a great deliverer of punchlines, and her class parrot- ing isn’t too bad either. Wall, after seeming so vulnerable, performed a nuanced turnaround where it would’ve been easy to go over the top in the abrupt change. Fine, the setting’s not great, and the play gets intense a little fast – but it’s also genuinely funny at times, and the cast is earnest. There’s a dramatic pen to watch here, and a voice to follow 

Review: Never Mind Where Your Daughter Lies

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

A sound close to that of fingernails ripping apart the surface of a glass pane lifts the darkness off the stage. While the characters on stage seem to be celebrating a marriage, the penetrating sound mutes any conversation.

A sinister sense of foreboding accompanies the prologue of John Oxley and Douglas Taylor’s drama Never Mind Where Your Daughter Lies. The matrimony of Thomas and Jane is supposed to seal the wounds and ease the tensions between their two families. While that is not a new scheme to the drama world, there is something inexplicably unique about this script.

Orchestrated in perfect symmetry, the eight characters drive the fragile peace into a deadlock as the celebrations progress. William has a special interest in revoking the union, he cannot let go of his romantic past with Jane. His key is Jane’s desperate brother Oliver, who owes him a sum of money large enough to betray his own sister. With a poem that Oliver is supposed to read to Thomas, William intends to expose Jane’s debauched past.

There they stand, in all their misery, pain muting their words. The disillusion is com- plete as Jane has no pretence of defending her wrongdoings. After a moment of confusion and disbelief, the misery elevates new speed as the characters irrevocably strive for the ultimate catastrophe. Blind in pain, the darkest character of all, Jane’s father Edmund, emerges out of his shadow to fulfil the inevitable doom of the newly wed. It is almost a release as the tensions unleash in the final scenes, culminating in bloodshed.

Playing virtuously on the scale of human misery, this play bears witness to a great script. Oxley and Taylor tell a fragmented story in rhyme and prose that offers dark humour and irony, without the heaviness of bearing a message. The haunting lines (“The past is an unavoidable reality”) were met by a variety of colloquialisms (“People are so fucking stupid”) yet it never slipped into cringe-worthy pseudo adolescence.

This balancing act between such sinister and airy passages was overall well-executed by an ensemble that united a good share of the Oxford drama world.

Femi Nylander as the frantic husband Thomas delivers an outstanding performance alongside his disillusioned but amiable wife Jane, played by Mary Higgins. With precision, Andrew Crump presented the groom’s brother, displaced in peaceful times and longing back for war days, he loses himself in booze and drugs.

The great variety of experimental techno and classical elements that John Willis fuses into an eclectic soundtrack amplifies the intricacy of the characters and their relations. As the mesmeric plot unfolds and the actors delve into their misery, we can only thank cast and directors for a convincing and unique performance 

How to…Become a BNOC

0

Last week, two esteemed lists hit the Oxford scene. Since the publication of The OxStu and Cherwell’s BNOC lists, there has been an overwhelming uproar. The OxStu’s list (famed for the plethora of poor spelling, grammar, and an inherent inability to use Photoshop) and Cherwell’s (accurate and excellently presented) list have induced mass bitterness and smugness. But as the Bard once said, what is past is prologue. And no one ever reads the prologue. To appease, I have collected together some advice, so that by this time next year you will be able to revel in the luxurious ease of being a BNOC.

Firstly, in order to become a BNOC, you’re going to need to understand the term. BNOC stands for ‘Big Name On Campus’. This seems simple, but The OxStu seemed to have misunderstood it, literally lengthening Annie Teriba’s name by an extra letter. This is not what it means. You are a big name, because people know of you. Students have stalked you on Facebook. They’ve seen your trout pout from 2010. They know which club nights you go to. It is not creepy in any way whatsoever. BNOCs are like accessible celebrities. The celebrity is taken off its ledge, and placed in the same reality as you. You have mutual friends with them. You walk past them on Cornmarket. “What, then, is the difference between me and them?” I hear you mutter under your breath. Stop muttering. The difference: they’re at least pretending to do something with their life.

Whether on stage, dwelling in the murky realms of the Union, picking L-G-B-Q-T out of their alphabet spaghetti, holding a placard, burning a boat, or wearing an OUSU polo shirt. They’re doing something. But the thing is, what they do remains irrelevant. All that remains imprinted in people’s brains are their faces and names. Which thankfully makes everything far more simple. All you need to do is implant. Your name and face need to be familiar. Write your name in library books. Try “I 

Get a friend to stand in the middle of Cornmarket. It’s best to try and execute this exercise on a Saturday, when Cornmarket is most strongly representative of a locust infestation. Walk down from one end. Instruct your friend so that as soon as you are in view they shout, “OH MY GOD IT’S [insert your name]”. They should then run over and ask to take a selfie with you, which you kindly accept, before continuing to very slowly amble on. Your friend should then hyperventilate and walk from circle to circle of people, pointing at you and exclaiming how cool you are. With this basis, you now only need to maintain your resting bitch face for the next year, and make sure to join Cuntry Living. In a year’s time you will be wearing a shiny gilded badge of glory.

But a warning: as I have broached before, Oxford is not actually real. Your BNOC badge will expire as soon as you graduate. Hard luck.

Oxford Odyssey: 30 colleges in one day

We smile sheepishly as someone wishes us luck. Despite the subfusc, we are not about to make the trek to Exam Schools on this particular morning. The clue is perhaps in our choice of practical and, crucially, comfortable footwear, our rucksacks, and our conspicuous lack of carnations. In fact, we are preparing to embark on a kind of urban DofE, one that almost requires endurance levels worthy of a finalist. 

It all started in Wagamama, halfway through Hilary Term. Grabbing a napkin, we wrote a bucket list of 50 things we wanted to do in Oxford before we leave. Aware that Emily was going on her year abroad we were determined that we should make the most of our time left at Oxford together. We quickly realised that we wanted to see all of the colleges, and so the seeds of madness were sown. After all, if we wanted to see all of them, why not do that in one day… in full subfusc… with a mascot bunny also in subfusc?

The first thing to decide was the criteria by which to select the colleges – we were a little alarmed to learn that there were 44! We settled on visiting all the undergraduate colleges, starting at St Hilda’s and ending at St Hugh’s. This left us with 30 colleges… Surely this was easily walkable in a day? With the methodical determination usually reserved for finding an obscure book in the Bodleian, we chose an order, highlighted our map like in the good old days of bronze DofE and were ready to start.

Having spent half an hour in St Hilda’s, we very quickly realised that our plan of spending ten minutes looking around each college may have been a little ambitious. As Brasenostrils, we are used to getting from one side of the college to the other in no time at all. We were not going to be finished by 4pm for afternoon tea as originally planned. Part of the delay was due to the need to convince the porters at St Hilda’s of our perfectly harmless intentions. For some reason, they were worried we might look out of place and felt the need to give us visitor passes. As we got our evidence sheet signed and stamped by the porters, one of them told us merrily, “You must be mad… No wait, you can’t be mad, you study at Oxford!” And then he drew a smiley face.

Despite our college loyalty, every college impressed us. Our highlights were:

Tolkien Table, Merton College

Keble chapel

The garden in New College 

Lincoln front quad

The graveyard in Teddy Hall

 

And slightly less traditional highlights included:

The bridge in Pembroke

The Wesley Room in Lincoln

The animal carvings in Worcester Chapel

The bell tower in St Catz

The greenhouse in Corpus Christi

 

The colleges with the best wisteria were: Worcester, Teddy Hall, Univ, New College and LMH. But to our surprise, the best thing about the day was the conversations we had. The porters’ initial reactions ranged from sceptical to bemused to full-blown giggling. In Corpus Christi, having only got as far as mentioning that we were from Brasenose, we were treated to a “Pity that”. Porters appear to be the masters of repartee. Having watched us pose with a cuddly bunny in their front quads, many decided that we were the source of entertainment for the day and were happy to talk to us.

This ranged from a conversation about family history and Victorian literacy rates with a Christ Church ‘custodian’ to the social life of the Hertford cat. At Teddy Hall, we were provided with the amusing anecdote of a wild student who had returned five years later a reformed character in a smart suit, accompanied by his wife and baby. Upon seeing rowdy students outside the lodge, he turned to his wife and exclaimed, “Students these days just don’t know how to behave!” In Worcester the porter, also an electric guitarist, gleefully told us, “I’m the only person in my band without a doctorate – how tragic is that?” In St Catz, we were given an interesting insight into the lives of the porters, “We have 870 students here – it’s a nightmare when the post arrives.” We also had many conversations with students and with people who were not linked to the university. It was striking that wearing subfusc made us more approachable and gave people a reason to talk to us. 

After hunting for St Hugh’s like a drunken student on a mission to find Hassan’s after staggering out of Park End, nearly nine hours after we started, we felt proud of our achievement. We spoke to people we would never normally have spoken to, left everything behind without leaving the city, and appreciated the vastness of the university. We would like to thank all the porters we met; it was lovely to see how proud they are of their colleges. In Somerville the porter leapt out of the lodge to encourage us to explore every corner when he feared we were just seeing the front quad. In Wadham, the porters gave us a prospectus. In Lincoln, they let us see the Wesley Room. They all hunted out their best stamps or gave us their autographs with a flourish.

To end with the heartfelt words of a volunteer in Christ Church Cathedral, “No matter what happens, just remember you’re at Oxford, so you’re already superstars!”

Diary of a… Blues Swimmer

0

The day begins with an alarm – normally I get through about six of them before dragging myself out of bed and throwing on some warm clothes to cycle to Iffley Road for morning training. In winter months it can be pretty cold and grim, and quite often makes me seriously consider why I got up in the first place. Gloves are essential, and if you forget and try to brave it without them, your hands may as well be icicles by the time you get there. Once, in the middle of the big January freeze, sleep-deprived and stupidly unwilling to make the trip back through College to my room, I decided to use my socks as a substitute. Needless to say, by the time I made it to Iffley, both my fingers and toes had succumbed to third-degree frostbite (or so it felt). 

While diving into a cold pool at 7am may not appeal to everyone, I actually find it quite refreshing and a good way to start the day. Warm-ups are quite short and are pretty self-explanatory, while main sets vary each day – Monday mornings are endurance, Saturdays tend to include sprints, and Tuesdays are kick sets (I avoid going on Tuesdays). After the session we stretch as a group for a bit, and then it’s a cycle back to college for a quick but enormous breakfast before lectures or work for the day. Everything that you’ve heard about swimmers’ appetites is true – I’ve had to get used to living with constant hunger. It’s always a frantic dash to get the right food into my body in that crucial digestive window thirty minutes after a training session.

Evening training is a similar story, although it’s not as cold and I’m not half-asleep at this point so the cycle there isn’t quite so horrific. 

However, this is more than made up for by the gruelling land-based HIIT (high-intensity interval training) workouts we do on poolside before the session, which involve so many core exercises that I’m often unable to sit up for a week afterwards. One that’s particularly tough is a pyramid set of planks, which involves holding the position for increasingly long lengths of time, from thirty seconds up to five minutes, and back down again. 

Following this moderate form of torture we dive in for another two-hour swimming set. The intensity and length of these sets tend to vary according to the time of year – in Michaelmas the long-term focus is preparation for the varsity match so the sets are longer and tougher, while in the immediate run-up to competitions, we ease off (taper) to allow our bodies to rest and recover. We sometimes split into groups, so that some of us can focus on sprints while others swim longer distances. 

Many of the sessions also involve some hypoxic work, which literally means “low oxygen” so involves not breathing for lengths at a time and other breath-holding exercises. However, the lifeguards aren’t so keen on these sets anymore after one of the team fainted in the middle of the pool while doing one.

Following Wednesday evening training we have team socials or crewdates, most likely located at the fine establishment of Temple Lounge and which involve upholding some swim team traditions for the youngest member of the team (Team Junior, or TJ). We then descend upon Vinnie’s as a group for a quick Pinky (a deceptively-strong cocktail) or two, before trekking to Park End to lose completely any benefits of the earlier training session. Thankfully, there’s no training on Thursday mornings…

Overall, life as a Blues swimmer is pretty similar to normal student life – the only real differences are the 10,000 calorie diets, chronically-aching limbs, a propensity to fall asleep in lectures, and the residual smell of chlorine that seems to follow us wherever we go.

The intricacies of dreaming

0

Most of us rarely remember our dreams, despite the fact that we spend on average more than two hours dreaming each night. Research has shown that dreams play a vital role in our health and mental well-being, and there are some strange phenomena associated with dreaming which can also help us learn about the science of dreams. 

Over the years, many different theories have been put forward about why we dream, and what these dreams mean, but until recently we have not had the technological capabilities to test these theories. Cristina Marzano and her colleagues at the University of Rome published a paper in the Journal of Neuroscience in 2011 which measured the brainwaves of participants at different stages of sleep and recorded whether or not they remembered their dreams. Interestingly, the brain activity that was recorded looked just the same as you would expect to see for a participant retrieving and recording memories whilst he or she was awake. The same research team found that vivid, emotionally intense dreams are linked to two specific parts of the brain – one that deals with processing and remembering emotions, and one that plays a role in memory. Other recent research has backed up this connection between dreaming and emotion – it has been found that a lack of ‘dream sleep’ influences our ability to process complex emotions in our everyday lives. 

All of this research taken together leads to the theory that dreams help us to process emotions by constructing memories of them, so that while the content of our dreams may not be real, the emotions we experience in them are. Dreams help us to work through and process our emotions, particularly negative ones, showing that there is a scientific reasoning behind the advice to “sleep on it” when making an important decision. 

Most of this important dreaming occurs during REM (rapid eye movement) sleep. There are, however, four other phases of sleep, all of which are non-REM. During REM sleep we normally lose the use of our muscles and are essentially paralysed – this is so that whilst we are dreaming we don’t act out the things that we dream. Many cases of REM behaviour disorder have been recorded, in which the brain of the sufferer fails to properly immobilise the body so that these people act out their dreams, often causing harm to themselves or others. Some particularly strange cases have been recorded, in which sleepwalkers have been observed eating and even cooking during sleep, although this sleepwalking occurs during non-REM sleep and its causes are not well understood. Even more bizarre are the reported cases of ‘sexsomnia’. The research here is limited as it often relies on self-reports, but there are many cases of sufferers engaging in various sexual activities only to have no recollection of it upon waking the next day. There have been at least five controversial cases in which men have been acquitted of sexual assault charges because they claimed they were asleep during the attack. 

However, an even more common sleep disorder, sleep paralysis, is essentially the opposite of this. Sleep paralysis is the experience of being unable to move or talk, which occurs most often when someone is waking up, although it can also occur in the early stages of sleep. The paralysis can last anywhere from a few seconds to a couple of minutes. It can be a frightening experience because you are entirely conscious throughout – just unable to move. It is very common for sufferers to experience the sensation of breathlessness or something restricting their breathing. 

What makes the paralysis more frightening is that many sufferers report experiencing hallucinations at the same time – in 1999, a study reported that in 75 per cent of students who had experienced sleep paralysis, hallucinations had accompanied the experience. Particularly common is the sensation of another presence in the room, often of a supernatural or demonic kind. 

This has led to sleep paralysis finding its way into folklore – for example, in China it is known as “the ghost pressing down on you”, and in Mexico “the dead climb on top of you”. 

Despite a few rather strange and curious sleep disorders, most of which are easily treatable, sleep is undoubtedly of vital importance for mental health and well-being. If nothing else, this gives you the perfect excuse for a nap.

If you liked this, read more in Bang! magazine. 

Creaming Spires TT15 Week 6

0

I’ve always liked being in control. Whether it’s essays or meticulously-organised fun, I’m used to having everything planned to my liking days in advance. I’d always assumed that this craving for control extended to my sex life. But on this particular occasion, I gave in to the experience of being dominated, and subsequently unearthed my hidden submissive sexual desires. There I sat, in my dingy, lonely Cowley flat, on a cold and depressing January evening. With my flatmates nowhere to be found, and the satisfaction of masturbation rapidly declining, I searched for fulfilment with increasing desperation. I could feel myself ebbing ever closer to an existential crisis of loneliness. 

At school, I had a brief relationship with a girl in the year below, only to find a flirty connection with a friend of her older sister (let’s call her Joan). She was headstrong and confident, in a different sexual league to my 16-year-old self, primarily because she was having sex and I definitely was not. She told me stories of throttling, spanking and threesomes. Our conversation over the subsequent five years became less intense, but remained flirtatious. Excessive Facebook stalking that January evening told me that Joan had moved into close proximity in Oxford, and I decided to try my luck for a demonstration of her self-proclaimed sexual prowess. 

We had drinks. She spoke to me with patronising disdain, as though I were 20 years her junior, rather than eight months. Indeed, several times she referred to me as a ‘little boy’. Rather than being insulted by her attitude, it stirred something inside me that I had never felt before. We joked about her flamboyant stories and my mundane ones. But it added to the sexual dynamic; I knew, even in flirtation, that I was not going to be the one calling the shots that night. What was interesting was that, despite my control freak instincts, how much I liked it. Indeed, quite against the inclinations of my libido, Joan insisted that we finish two bottles of wine before we headed into the bedroom. 

I was in for a surprise. It was not what we did, but the way we did it that surprised me. I was verbally ordered, often with physical encouragement, in every act. Joan instructed me to go down on her, and grasped my head between her legs, calling out comprehensive orders on rhythm. Panting, and thrilled by this turn of events, I was then told to lie on my back while Joan pinned my hands behind my head and completely dominated me. She ordered me to fuck her from behind, and while I did so, she inserted a finger into my bum. Out of surprise rather than pain or pleasure, I tensed up, and received a stern telling off for my pause in gyration. Still reeling from the experience, I came as per her instructions, “Not inside me, for fuck’s sake, and nowhere visible.” 

Never before had I been instructed to push my sexual boundaries in such an explicit and satisfying way. Joan opened the door to the world of BDSM for me, and I’m learning everyday about the exciting possibilities of being a submissive partner.

Double win for triathletes

0

Swimming. Jumping out into the cold. Cycling. More cold. Running. Even more cold. Triathlon may seem like a sport pur­posefully designed to capture the essence of those grim October PE lessons spent slogging round a field in the rain while the substitute teacher with too much power and a waterproof coat screams at you, but some people seem to enjoy it. So much so that these last few weeks have seen the Oxford University Triathlon Team enjoy enormous success in both varsity and at the BUCS nationals.

This year’s varsity was held for the first time at Leicestershire’s Belvoir Castle, a fantastic but tough course composed of a shallow swim, a 400m transition period and a running section effectively all hill. Such difficult conditions however, according to Luke Sperry, “brought out the best” in the Oxford team. Though 34 athletes competed for Oxford in this year’s race, each team’s score is equated by adding the top three times together. The men were led by Oliver Crossley, Thomas Lewin and Charlton Bannister, winning by a very impressive 15 seconds to claim the trophy for the first time since 2003. The Oxford women’s team, which has traditionally been stronger in comparison to Cambridge, dominated the race from start to finish, a team of Sophia Saller, Imogen Kempton and Renee Haver beating their op­position by an astounding 25 minutes to round off a very successful day of racing for the entire OUTriC.

Buoyed by this performance, the club went to the BUCS nationals full of momentum, with Renee Haver (16th in the women’s category), Imogen Kempton (18th in the women’s), and Oliver Crossley (23rd in the men’s) registering some excellent finishes, especially in the dif­ficult weather conditions. All three are now lucky to gain their full blues after success at both levels, while the other three have a chance to gain their half blue colours.

Sperry was particularly proud of the strong showing from both sides of the club, comment­ing, “Though there are more men than women are competing, the phenomenal success of both teams attests to the healthy continuing growth of both male and female participa­tion.” This growth is down undeniably to the encouragement by the OUTriC committee in attracting not just sadomasochistic endur­ance athletes, but also the newcomers and those wanting to keep fit. They have developed a resolute squad across the year, ranging from ex-OUBC oarsmen to complete novices to endurance athletes.

All three men in varsity this year had never competed in the triathlon before reaching uni­versity, making use of the most the excellent facilities and coaching structure. This year saw the addition of new central performance coach Rachel Hallam who, according to a vari­ous members of the club, has been “absolutely marvellous”. Making sure both elements of the club, from the casual to the competitive, are well maintained and managed is evidently important for Sperry and his committee.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%11905%%[/mm-hide-text]

Though the committee is in the process of handing over, Sperry is confident of the continued excellence demonstrated by this year’s fantastic results. “We would encourage anyone who is considering getting involved with a new sport,” he tells Cherwell, “whether it’s in order to compete at a high level or to try something new, to give triathlon a go.”

With this year’s excellent record, a growing team and an enthusiastic, dedicated commit­tee, it might just be enough to get people to forget those cold winter cross country runs at school and give triathlon the chance the sport deserves. Well, maybe.