Tuesday 8th July 2025
Blog Page 1260

"We’re at the bottom of the power chain"

0

Part of C+’s investigation into the treatment of College Staff

came to England five years ago, and I’m in my third year here. I don’t want to speak too negatively about the staff and students at my college because on the whole, I do feel respected by them. There was one instance when a staff member called the scouts “greedy pigs” because we took too much of the free lunch allowance, but comments like that are quite rare.

The management make a good effort if it’s your birthday, for instance. We get on well with the other departments – before Christ- mas some of the scouts and catering staff went on a night out with the porters. One of the more senior staff members and I do a good Fawlty Towers sketch together.

It’s hard to say whether we’re listened to.

Management hold a few liaison meetings with us and there’s a suggestions box in the basement where our main office is. The main problem is that we’re pretty much at the bottom of the “power” chain. You often feel like your suggestions won’t be acted on when they’ve got their own ways of how to run the place.

There’s been a bit of a shift in the past few years – a lot of colleges, mine included, have been seized with a kind of “managerial spirit”. There’s a big focus on making money. If you’re a manager you need to ensure results. People don’t necessarily like or need change for change’s sake.

Also, before this managerial era you could rise up through the ranks. Someone here started out as a scout about 30 years ago and has now made it to one of the managerial positions. I don’t think you can do that anymore – it’s a shame, but I guess you need a degree to do nearly everything these days.

I guess it’s just that a lot of colleges are trying to keep up with the zeitgeist. We hosted conference after conference this summer, and I don’t think there’s necessarily a bad thing, just as long as it’s translated into more pay for us. We do get a bonus over the conference season though, and there are plenty of extra shifts going.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10819%%[/mm-hide-text]

There has been a noticeable change in my pay this year, whereas before that they’d often add on just one per cent. I just fear that the college, having matched this Living Wage rate, will think ‘that’s that job done’. You’d have thought they could at least pay us a few pence above that, to show that they’re not just concerned with hitting targets? £7.85 won’t get you very much in Oxford.

My frustration is perhaps more with the town itself than the College. Rent and bills are extortionate – personally, I think that the council should put a cap on it. It makes me furious when estate agents with flashy iPads show me round tiny cupboards that they ex- pect you to buy and live in! A colleague of mine has to work three or four hours at college, then another few hours at a school as a cleaner. It’s unavoidable if you’re raising a kid by yourself and you’ve got a mortgage to pay.

Still, it’s an enjoyable job if you go in with the right attitude. I feel – I hope – that the students respect me. You’re never going to win over everyone – I’ll mainly speak to the same ones again and again, particularly those who started at the same time as me and are now in their final year. The scouts who don’t talk to students often don’t speak much English or they’re naturally a bit shy.

A friend of mine who struggles with the language joked to me this morning, “I must come across as crazy for not talking to the students.”

Another told me that she feels insecure talking to students whose parents might be rich bankers or famous actors. These problems will crop up every now and then, and it’s a great shame, but the students themselves aren’t usually responsible. That said, more students should acknowledge that many scouts have had to go through things in their lives that undergraduates are too young to even imagine. 

"Most felt like their opinions didn’t matter"

0

Part of C+’s investigation into the treatment of College Staff

I’ve worked with the scouts about five months in total and I can’t say that I have been mistreated. On the contrary, whenever I had some issues (meal entitlements not being fair between the different types of student workers, for example), the Lodge Manager and Bursar helped me more than I could have hoped. However, the way the scouts see the college is completely different to the way the students do.

When students are in college, everything is nice and quiet. Each scout has to do the same job over and over again and they normally work with the same group of students. So far, the only issue I can remember was when people leave a big mess at the end of term and it’s a bit tricky to clear it all up. They do get extra help in those cases.

However, things get a bit out of control during vacations when the workload ranges from nothing to not humanly possible. There is very bad communication between the Domestic Bursar, Lodge Manager and conference coordinators, and it is often the case that they get told to do something when in fact they have to do the complete opposite.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10819%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

A particularly bad experience was when there were two events happening consecutively and the changeover was supposed to be on a Sunday. Everyone knew about it, and the scouts got all the rooms ready by Friday. However, after Housekeeping closed that day, the conference team booked another 30-40 arrivals for Sunday. It ended with one scout working until 11pm, having been in since 9am – there were no apologies, nothing.

They also don’t get paid overtime properly. Supposedly, if college needs people to work more than usual, the scout can choose to get a day off, or get paid time-and-a-half. However, despite this being a rule that the Domestic Bursar made very clear in a meeting with the scouts and the Lodge Manager, it has happened quite a few times that the scouts didn’t get paid their well-deserved extra money at the cut-off date.

Another thing which shocked me were the feedback forms they had to fill in. Most felt like their opinion didn’t matter or that there’s no point writing what you actually think of the job because the manager is going to question it and make you feel like you’re in the wrong.

Finally, this summer the scouts’ contract was changed, and they are no longer allowed to have lunch unless they stay for 30 minutes longer. They were extremely upset about this for a good few days. 

Hall staff "reduced to tears" and forced to wear makeup

0

On Tuesday 16 December, Oxford’s Living Wage Campaign announced that Hertford had become the first college to be fully accredited as a Living Wage Employer, committing to pay the Living Wage (currently £7.85) or above to all staff, year after year as the rate increases with inflation.

The news was leaked – the college has yet to officially confirm the decision, with an announcement expected later this month.

While it’s a huge step forward, C+ investigates some of the issues still facing scouts and hall staff – the lowest paid groups of staff in most colleges – as well as student attitudes towards them.

We found some alarming allegations of bullying, intolerance, and staff not being paid for overtime.

Other articles in this Investigation: 

 

“It seems like everyone is keen to pretend that they don’t exist”

The above comment was left by a Somerville student responding to our survey, and it highlights the issue of “pretending” which I encountered throughout this investigation.

Some of the scouts and hall staff we spoke to allege that some colleges have previously pretended that staff have been paid in full, when overtime pay was still owed.

Other colleges give staff the chance to provide feedback through liaison meetings and forms, but the staff we spoke to felt scared to do so, feeling that their suggestions “won’t be acted on”.

Perhaps the worst pretending act we heard of, as detailed in Samuel Rutishauser-Mills’ feature, was when college authorities supposedly forced staff to go by different names when they work because their birth names sound “too foreign”. One staff member shrugged it off when I asked him about this, as though it was common practice, yet there are surely few things more demeaning than depriving someone of their own name.

Fair pay

It goes without saying that these alarming issues must be addressed by the colleges in question. If they are truly concerned with the wellbeing of their staff, they can begin by respecting them through the wages paid. 

Reassuringly perhaps, at least 16 colleges now pay their staff the Living Wage, yet only Hertford is accredited as a Living Wage Employer (meaning that they guarantee to pay all staff, including contractors, the Living Wage as it increases with inflation). This discrepancy is alarming, and represents a reluctance to commit to provide staff with the financial security they desperately need to live in one of the country’s most expensive areas.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10824%%[/mm-hide-text]

While the national rate has recently been set at £7.85, Oxford’s excessively high housing prices and general cost of living means that the minimum Living Wage rate is, at best, a bare minimum.

As put by one of the scouts I spoke to, “You’d have thought they could at least pay us a few pence above that, to show that they’re not just concerned with hitting targets?” If employers are taking the needs of their staff seriously, they should acknowledge the fact that Oxford’s cost of living is comparable to that of London, where the Living Wage rate is £9.15 per hour. 

Colleges “aware” of the Living Wage despite not paying it

Two of the colleges who admitted they didn’t pay all staff the Living Wage were keen to justify themselves by listing some of the other benefits available to their employees. St John’s, for instance, which pays its staff £7.47 if they don’t have an NVQ Qualification, told us that they offer “a generous non-contributory pension scheme after one year of service”. 

They assured us, “For comparability with other colleges who place their employees on the Oxford Staff Pension Scheme, the equivalent rate of pay with an employee pension contribution of 6.35 per cent would be £7.95 for staff without NVQs.”

St Antony’s, meanwhile, assured us that its rate of £7.21 “does not include a number of employee benefits such as extensive annual leave, very good pension contributions… and an annual bonus. 

“We are also in the process of initiating an overall College pay and benefits review.”

Worcester, who did not tell Cherwell exactly what their minimum wage paid to staff is, explained, “Worcester is aware of the living wage and continues to actively review the salaries and other benefits of its staff in relation to both local and regional standards.”

Elsewhere, St Hilda’s – paying some of its staff £7.65 – is “aware of the situation with regards to the Living Wage”, and told us that they “continue to give it active consideration”. 

Student Survey Results

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10821%%[/mm-hide-text]

Review: LÃ¥psley – Understudy EP

0
★★★★☆
Four Stars
 
If her new EP, Understudy, is anything to go by, then Holly ‘Låpsley’ Fletcher is clearly one to watch for 2015. Since her appearance on the BBC Introducing stage at Glastonbury, her career has really taken off, and her record deal with XL Recordings signed in October was the first step in what promises to be an exciting 12 months for the eighteen year old singer-songwriter.
 
Her sweet, folkish voice speaks for itself, and is showcased throughout the EP though perhaps best of all on ‘Dancing’, the EP’s final track. These tremendous vocals are laid over simple percussion and synthetic beats, creating an understated yet incredibly powerful sound.
 
While the first track, ‘Falling Short’, might be the song grabbing all the headlines with its wailing vocals, the second song, ‘Brownlow’, is perhaps the most exciting, and its complexity and maturity suggest that there is a lot more depth to come from Låpsley in her future releases.
 
Låpsley’s lyrics belie her years and show great emotional intelligence, with the EP taking on an almost mournful tone overall, and sounding like the work of a much older and more experienced musician. All in all, this is a hugely exciting beginning to the year, and we’ll undoubtedly be hearing more of her in the months to come. Let’s hope her future releases won’t fall short of the promise revealed on Understudy.
 

2014: the year in film

0

Last year was, like any other 12 months in cinema, a mixture of highs and lows. Early in the year we saw the usual glut of Oscar contenders, with January releases of the utterly harrowing 12 Years A Slave and Scorsese’s Wolf of Wall Street, a film whose ultimate moral was lost under mountains of coke and hookers and obscured by the fact that once again, Leo was snubbed at the awards. February saw the surprise highlight of the year, The Lego Movie, which amazed and delighted at every turn. March’s The Grand Budapest Hotel was, by contrast, less than impressive. Wes Anderson swapped substance for style and upset the careful balance that had made his films brilliant since 1998’s Rushmore: there was little emotional punch in this chocolate box of a movie. Bushy beards were the flavour of the month in April with the darkly comic Catholic drama Calvary and similarly biblical Noah. Superhero season got underway tentatively with The Amazing Spider-Man 2, then continued in earnest in May with X-Men: Days of Future Past. Time travel was central to X-Men’s plot, but it wasn’t handled nearly as well as Edge of Tomorrow, the true standout sci-fi movie of the year. Gripping performances from Tom Cruise and Emily Blunt helped reconcile elements of Groundhog DaySaving Private Ryan and video game aesthetics for thrilling results. 

Summer began with a fallow month, as June witnessed the release of 22 Jump Street, a placeholder of a movie, and the trainwreck that was Grace of MonacoTransformers: Age of Extinction did nothing to lift the quality of summer blockbusters, despite becoming the highest grossing movie of 2014. All was not lost, however, as Boyhood emerged as the most moving movie of 2014 and the boldest undertaking of the past ten years. Though far from flawless, the triumph of artistic endeavour over real-life practicality which it represented was hugely significant. July then ended as it began, with another, better, blockbuster, in the form of Guardians of the Galaxy.

August was a month of sequels where originality was thin on the ground. Inbetweeners 2, Sin City 2 and Expendables 3 were all forgettable. Nonetheless, Marion Cotillard offered a moving performance in the quiet gem Two Days, One Night. In September, Oxford’s PR department soiled itself as The Riot Club singlehandedly destroyed decades of access work, whilst Philip Seymour Hoffman’s last hurrah, A Most Wanted Man, did similar damage to the reputation of the CIA in the War on Terror. The feel-good award for 2014 went to Pride, before David Fincher took things firmly back to his disconcerting best in October with the ice-cold Gone Girl. This, and the disturbingly stylish Nightcrawler, stood in contrast to the lukewarm offerings of the mawkish Love, Rosie and Brad Pitt’s Fury, before Mike Leigh topped off an excellent month by trying his hand at something different with Mr. Turner

The quality continued into November with the mind-bending Interstellar and a brilliant turn from Benedict Cumberbatch in The Imitation Game. Hailed as the best British film of the year, anything less than a nomination for Cumberbatch from the Academy would be a travesty. It was also the beginning of the end for the Hunger Games franchise, as Mockingjay: Part 1 flew the nest to decent reviews and $675m in box office takings. The following month, there was another conclusion in the form of the final Hobbit film – a spectacle of suitably epic proportions that proved too much for some. Meanwhile, Ridley Scott’s Exodus: Gods and Kings came under attack for alleged racist casting whilst The Interview came under literal attack. In all, 2014 proved that cinema is in a healthy state. From the billion-dollar blockbusters to the grainy arthouse charmers, creativity is fomenting, formulae are being perfected and ideas are cross-pollinating. Here’s to an even better 2015.

No "watershed" of A2 immigrants

0

A Study by Oxford University’s Migration Observatory published on December 30th 2014 reported that there hasn’t been a huge influx of Romanian and Bulgarian (often referred to as A2) immigrants to the UK over 2014, as many as expected.

A year after EU countries were legally required to stop restricting Romanian and Bulgarian migrants’ access to labour markets, the report concluded, “The number of A2-born population grew by a similar amount before and after transitional controls were ended, with most of the growth occurring before… controls were lifted.”

Following the flurry of speculation in the media about how many A2 migrants would come to the UK after the ending of transition controls, the University of Oxford Migration Observatory sought to offer independent and evidence-based analysis of migration statistics used by the press.

Head of Media and Communications at The Migration Observatory, Robert McNeil told Cherwell, “News stories are more than just the transfer of information, they are a part of a ‘product’ – be that a newspaper, or a TV programme or whatever. The Migration Observatory works to inform public debate, making an effort to ensure the correct numbers are used, but we don’t take a view on how they should be interpreted.

“The 2013 stories about the anticipated scale of the movement of Bulgarian and Romanian migrants to the UK after January 1 2014 stemmed from different news organisations’ efforts to segment their audience – so depending on the audiences, some media suggested that the numbers would be large, others that they would be small, but, critically, none actually knew how many would come.”

He added that the language of scale is relative and therefore the statistics could be used in different ways, with the increase by September 2014 of 47,000 being interpreted as a serious influx of immigrants by some media outlets, whilst others saw it as essentially no different to the increase of 45,000 of 2013.

Pembroke undergraduate Carl Gregs commented, “There seems to be an overwhelming negative bias against A2 migrants throughout the entire media spectrum, which I personally wouldn’t have expected. Obviously they are all allowed to voice an opinion. But seeing as the immigration wave they were scaremongering about did not happen as this data shows, I reckon it was the wrong opinion – especially the tabloid publications seem very inadequate.”

The report specifically discussed the significant increase in the number of National Insurance Numbers allocated to Romanian and Bulgarian-born people in 2014 recently reported by press, putting the large amount down to the decision of migrants already living in the UK before 2014 to apply for NINs, rather than a “significant spike” in the number of migrants themselves.

Nonetheless, The Migration Observatory stated that it was “less clear” to what degree the controls actually prevented people from joining the UK labour market after their introduction in 2007.

Oxford don: settlements not key issue in Israel’s West Bank

0

Dr Sara Hirschhorn, an Oxford lecturer in Israeli Studies, has made a speech claiming that any resolution of the settlement problem in the West Bank would make little impact on peace in the Middle East whilst any ideological tensions remain.

The West Bank is an area of land east of Israel. Designated as part of a new Arab state in the UN 1948 partition plan, it was taken over by Jordan after the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Israel subsequently took control of the land in 1967 after the Six-Day War, and has since been building settlements in Palestinian teritory, despite this being illegal under international law. UN Resolutions 242 and 338 stipulate that Israel must withdraw completely from the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem.

Speaking at Limmud 2014, a Jewish festival of arts and ideas, Hirschhorn remarked, “The settlements are not the problem. It’s not a conflict about territory, water, refugees or any of the practical political issues [alone].

“If you’re a policy maker, there’s any number of plans you can use to reach a peace deal. This doesn’t matter, because it’s not a conflict about all of these things; it’s a conflict about narrative. This is an ideological conflict.”

Hirschhorn told Cherwell, “The two-state solution or any other political solution that does not resolve underlying ideological tensions is unlikely to be a claims-ending, durable peace.”

She did point out though that this did not mean settlements were unproblematic, saying, “Continued building causes pain and lack of trust amongst the Palestinian population, and weakens the moderate Palestinian leadership that needs to be empowered as a partner to a future peace deal.”

Stressing the complexity of the settler movement, she said that she has tried to illuminate “the complexity of this movement made up of more than 300,000 individuals beyond stereotypes presented in the media and popular culture”.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10816%%[/mm-hide-text]

The Oxford Students’ Arab Cultural Society commented, “Dr Hirschhorn’s opinions, as put forth at Limmud 2014, reflect the views of Israel and the extremist settler parties that now dominate its government.

“For those familiar with Israeli propaganda, Hirschhorn’s comments fit into a well-worn narrative that detracts from the horror of Israeli settler-colonialism by posing Israel’s illegal military occupation as an existential ‘conflict of narratives’.

“This attempts to alleviate Israeli responsibility for its historic and continuing project of forcible population transfer (ethnic cleansing) and the regime of institutionalised racial discrimination (apartheid) by which it is realised, and of which Israel’s armed settler gangs are but the tip of the iceberg.

“It is a shame that an Oxford University lecturer chooses to propagate views that undermine international legal norms and support the extremist policies of the Israeli government rather than supporting legal accountability, peace and justice.”

Law undergraduate David Browne commented, “There seems little doubt in the minds of the international community that Israeli settlements violate international law, but the vast majority of such settlements are near the Green Line, meaning that their existence should certainly not be a deal-breaker to peace.

“However, it is difficult to suggest that, when Israel is surrounded by countries which do not even recognise its existence, and did not even before settlement construction began, and threatened by Hamas on its doorstep, that any resolution of the settlement question will make much of an impact on peace in the region.”

OxStew: Vice-Chancellor takes pay cut

0

Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Andrew Hamilton, has today announced his intention to reduce his salary from £424,000 to £50,000 a year. His announcement follows a social media campaign from Oxford students highlighting the disparity between his wage and that of the lowest-paid staff at the University.

In a statement released today, Hamilton praised the hard work and dedication of all the University’s staff, and acknowledged that the extent of disparity in pay between certain staff members was not actually justified by their differing job roles. “It turns out that, on reflection, my job isn’t 30 times harder than anyone else’s, so I’ve come to the conclusion that I probably don’t deserve 30 times the pay-package,” he said.

“Furthermore, it’s getting harder and harder, as my salary gets bigger and bigger, to maintain that the University’s finances are in a terrible predicament, and that the only way to rescue them is to raise tuition fees to £16,000. Hopefully now that I’ve taken a pay-cut my campaigning in that area will seem a little less monstrously hypocritical.”

When asked what inspired this move, Hamilton credited pressure from the student campaign against his pay-package, but attributed his ultimate decision to actually act on this pressure to an anonymous undergraduate who attended one of his termly breakfasts. “I set these breakfast meetings up,” said Hamilton, “to take the pulse of the ordinary undergraduate student. One such ordinary student pointed out that I earned over 20 times what his mother, a primary school teacher, earns, and that whilst her day involved seven hours in the classroom and an evening of marking homework, mine involved breakfast, coffee with the master of Christ Church, lunch with a benefactor of the University, afternoon tea with an old school friend, and formal hall at St. John’s. Of course, this is a long and gruelling day by any standards, but I could see his point that it was not quite 20 times as gruelling as his mother’s work day.”

“Another student made the interesting point that the Prime Minister earns only £142,0000 – nearly three time less than the Vice-Chancellor of Oxford – and that holding ultimate responsibility for the welfare of British citizens versus a handful of students should be reflected to a certain extent by your pay-packet. From that moment onward I resolved to take a realistic look at my salary and how I could really show that I am one of you, that I am one of the people. Leszek Borysiewicz, the Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University, or ‘the dirty Tabs’ as I’ve heard them affectionately called by students, still earns in the ball park of £334,000, so I think it shows Oxford’s progressive nature that I will be making changes first.”

The University confirmed to The OxStew today that the £375,000 a year that would have gone on Mr. Hamilton’s salary is to be put in a hardship fund for staff and students. The fund, to be named ‘The Hamilton Big Thank You Fund’, will give small emergency grants to anyone within the University suffering from unexpected financial hardship. “Although this fund will make only a small difference to people’s lives,” Hamilton acknowledged, “I think it adds something to the symbolic gesture that I’m making. I care about the University as a beacon of learning and education, not as a money-making machine and I want my salary to reflect that.”

When asked if he had considered making the University of Oxford an accredited Living Wage employer, thus perhaps alleviating the need for such hardship funds, the Vice-Chancellor declined to comment. 

Oxford to expand on outreach

0

The Univeristy of Oxford’s outreach activities will expand significantly as part of a new government initiative. The £22m scheme includes three new National Networks for Collaborative Outreach (NNCO).

Oxford will take the lead in directing the activities of the Oxford and Cambridge NNCO. The programme will target Oxbridge-aspiring students in 1,600 English schools in order to improve the application support currently on
offer.

Admissions staff from both universities will also host online webinars, hoped to prove beneficial for students from geographically distant areas. Both universities aim to work with schools across England. Particularly targeted are schools which have had little past contact with Oxbridge outreach schemes, those with a history of sending very few students to Oxbridge and schools in socio-economically disadvantaged catchment areas.

A network of other establishments, including Somerville College, was also successful in its bid for an NNCO. 

Oxford’s current outreach activities include open days, school visits, UCAS higher education fairs and student and teacher conferences across the UK. Oxford also runs a Sutton Trust supported ‘Pathways’ programme, along with the free UNIQ summer schools, aimed at Year 12 state school students. OUSU runs its own shadowing scheme for Year 12 students through its ‘Target Schools’ strategy.

First year Theology student Eva Chapman welcomed the announcement of the NNCO, commenting, “It encourages bright pupils to aim high regardless of their background or the history of the school and it dispels many myths about the Oxbridge application process.”

Dr. Samina Khan, Oxford’s Director of Undergraduate Admissions and Outreach, told Cherwell, “Oxford’s work with the National Networks for Collaborative Outreach will add to the already significant amount of targeted access work the collegiate University undertakes

across the UK. While this particular programme is funded by the government and HEFCE to target students in English schools, the resources Oxford will be making available include a substantial amount of online support that can be accessed by anyone across the UK.

“Added to our programme of student and teacher conferences and partnership with the Welsh government to create support hubs for potential Welsh applicants to Oxford and Cambridge, these new partnerships will further our goal of supporting bright students in applying to Oxford, no matter what their background or where they come from.”

Speaking about the NNCOs, Greg Clark, Minister for Universities and Science, said, “This programme will ensure that schools and colleges across England can help their students learn about higher education in the classroom, online and through local outreach activity. A record number of students entered higher education in 2014, with entry rates for students from disadvantaged backgrounds increasing by over ten per cent to its highest ever level. However there is still more work to do to ensure all students who want to study hard can benefit, irrespective of their background.”

OUSU VP role up for grads

0

Following Yasser Bhatti’s resignation, due to take effect on Monday 19th January, attention has turned to his replacement. A by-election is expected to be held later this term to decide who will replace him as OUSU Vice-President for Graduates.

Nick Cooper, the VP-elect for the Academic year 2015-2016, has categorically ruled out running, stating, “As per OUSU Election Regulation 18.6, Sabbs-elect aren’t eligible to run in by-elections such as this one.”

The role of Vice-President for Graduates is to be fulfilled in the interim by Louis Trup, OUSU President, and James Blythe, OUSU Vice-President (Access & Academic Affairs).

Bhatti, who was on the ‘Jane4Change’ slate, was elected in Michaelmas Term 2013 and was meant to fulfil the rôle of Vice President for Graduates for the academic year 2014-15. In the 2013 OUSU elections, Bhatti was elected to the position with 231 votes.

OUSU President Louis Trup commented, “Yasser has been a valuable member of the OUSU team, working tirelessly to represent the graduate students at this university. It has been an honour to work with such a capable, innovative and dedicated person. Alongside everyone at OUSU, I wish him all the best in the future.”

Yasser Bhatti told Cherwell, “Regrettably, I made the decision to step down as I feel I am unable to juggle the role of VP Graduates along with my family responsibilities.

“I apologise for stepping down from the opportunity to further strengthen and serve students and the University, but the intensity of this role is just too much for me and more importantly for my two little girls.”