Monday 7th July 2025
Blog Page 1265

Whatever happened to the "Compassionate Conservatives"?

0

To start the build up to the election this May, Sunday’s Andrew Marr Show featured a twenty five minute interview with the Prime Minister. David Cameron had the opportunity to defend his government’s record over the last five years and promote his vision for a future majority Conservative government. People will, no doubt, pick up on his assertion that the NHS is not “unaffordable”, his clarification of the party’s line on Europe, and his “commitment” that the regular armed forces will not be reduced any further in the coming parliament. Yet, what struck me most from the interview was his revealing response to Marr’s questions on the marked drop in the delivery of ‘Meals on Wheels’ to elderly people from Conservative Councils. Whilst Cameron maintained the importance of budget responsibility and the provision of jobs, Marr questioned what had happened to the Big Society. The Prime Minister’s response was clear cut: “I am a Compassionate Conservative.”

The question is, what is a “Compassionate Conservative” and how can he reconcile his party’s increasingly right wing rhetoric with this stance?

When the Prime Minister searched around for explanations for how his government’s planned cuts to benefits which could put as many as 900,000 children into poverty, he struggled to sound compassionate. His eventual answer was that, “Compassion is measured in creating a growing economy”. I could only cringe.

Compassion can’t be measured. Nor should compassion be solely tied down to the government’s economic argument. A Compassionate Conservative should recognise that societies are not solely underpinned by economics, but rather individuals’ investment of time and effort into their communities. Compassionate Conservatism involves recognising the humanity of communal relationships that can’t necessarily be given a price tag.

There was a time when these kind of observations were integral to Conservative thought. The “Big Society” that headlined the Conservative bid for government at the last election promised a new direction for the party. David Cameron’s plans for a Big Society Bank for funding social enterprises promised a new conservatism that valued localism, communities, and social responsibility.

Equally promising were plans for a National Citizen’s Service (NCS) for 16-17 year olds from different backgrounds to mix and learn the values of participation in civic society. Through the rhetoric of the “Big Society”, David Cameron tried to convince us that the Conservatives could empathise with struggling families, neighbourhoods, and local social enterprises, if not a larger state.

David Cameron’s government has delivered on some of these promises. This year there will be an estimated 150,000 places available on NCS programmes for 16-17 year olds. A localism act was passed in 2011 giving individuals new rights and powers to make changes in their communities.

Yet, the promise of a compassionate “Big Society” working most effectively in the most deprived areas of the country has struggled to materialise. Only this time last year, a Centre for Social Justice report revealed the failure of “Big Society” initiatives to penetrate the most deprived regions of the country. Areas like Port Clarence in Teesside, or Camborne in Cornwall were described as “charity deserts”, seemingly overlooked by the “compassionate” policies of the government. The policy seemed to be working best in the places that needed it least– Conservative “compassion” could not quite reach out to the neediest.

Whatever the successes or failures of the “Big Society”, the problem now is that the kind of social initiatives that it promoted are disappearing from Conservative election rhetoric. Whereas the “Big Society” idea suggested that the new Conservatives were committed to a radical programme of compassionate social reform, the party’s current policy reaction to the rise of UKIP has undermined this. The more the ‘big idea’ behind David Cameron’s last bid for government recedes behind rhetoric on immigration, the EU and austerity measures, the further individuals will become alienated by Conservative claims to being “compassionate”.

The latest YouGov poll puts the Conservatives at 32 per cent of the vote – four points behind the Labour Party. David Cameron is perceived to be ahead of Ed Miliband on his leadership and the economy, yet his party is lagging behind in the polls. In the end, he has a choice: he can either chase after the 16 per cent of the vote taken up by UKIP, or he can reposition his party back towards the centre ground. If he is serious about winning this election, the Prime Minister should not chase the UKIP vote, but rather he should work to re-establish his links to the centre ground. This will only happen if he can reassure voters that his party understands our problems; that the Conservatives can once again be “compassionate”.

Review: The Interview

0

After threats by the North Korean affiliated organisation the Guardians of Peace and the cancelling of the New York première, followed by the decisions of major cinema chains in the US not to screen the movie, it was looking unlikely that The Interview would ever be released. The international situation has been discussed by people as varied as President Obama, who criticised the decision by Sony Pictures to cancel the release of the film (In typical fashion, Fox News incorrectly reported that Obama had banned the movie in the US), to Dr Evil, who made a welcome return on SNL. Finally, on midnight of Christmas Eve, the movie was finally released online in the United States, and it was rolled out to cinemas later that day.

Written by Seth Rogen, Evan Goldberg and Dan Sterling, The Interview follows Dave Skylark (James Franco), host of the talk show Skylark Tonight, and Aaron Rapoport (Seth Rogen), the producer of the show. The talk show is vapid and focuses on celebrity gossip, much like if the gossip column of the Daily Mail took the form of a show. The movie begins with Dave interviewing Eminem, who is defending his controversial new lyrics about hating old people. It’s all strong satire and really funny, because this is what Rogen and Franco do best – This Is The End was just an entire movie of celebrities portraying themselves and lampooning American pop culture (but mostly themselves). Despite the popularity of the show, Aaron has high ambitions to do “real journalism” and make the show more serious, which can’t be achieved by reporting that Matthew McConaughey has just had sex with a goat or featuring Joseph Gordon-Levitt stroking a group of cats (I must protest that an hour of watching him stroke cats is an excellent idea for a programme).

It is here that we find out that Kim Jong-un is a big fan of American TV, specifically the Big Bang Theory and Skylark Tonight. Well, there’s no accounting for taste. However this fortunate piece of news about Kim’s poor viewing habits leads Aaron to an idea – perhaps they can make the programme more reputable by conducing a serious interview with the elusive supreme leader of North Korea. Dave is interested: maybe Ron Howard will make a movie about them in the future, a reference to Frost/Nixon, an excellent film on the landmark interviews of 1977. The initial premise of The Interview can certainly be compared to Frost/Nixon: lightweight talk show host plans to conduct a serious political interview with an elusive leader (or ex-leader). However, this is not a Ron Howard movie. After some obligatory slow-mo frat party dancing to celebrate, a scene which is in every single Rogen and Franco film, they are contacted by the CIA. Agent Lacey (Lizzy Caplan) asks them to use this interview opportunity to “take out” Kim Jong-un. Cue extended scene of Aaron and Dave misunderstanding “take out”. Oh, to a party? Nearly every joke in this movie, no matter how funny, overstays its welcome. This is one of them.

Aaron and Dave fly to North Korea to meet Kim Jong-un (Randall Park). Dave and Kim get on famously, bonding over their love of margaritas and Katy Perry. Randall Park is great and a highlight of the movie. Whereas the rest of the film was filled with the usual hit-and-miss innuendos, dick jokes, and bad accents common to Rogen/Franco films (after their collaborations on Pineapple Express, This Is The End and the homoerotic Bound 2 parody I feel compelled to refer to them as a single entity), the depiction of the pop-loving crazy Kim Jong-un is actually pretty funny.

It’s a shame that there has been so much media attention on what is essentially a mediocre comedy. It never reaches the comedic heights of the Rogen and Goldberg scripted Superbad. There are some great characters, such as Sook (Diana Bang), a North Korean head of propaganda, and Kim Jong-un himself, but unfortunately the main characters, especially Franco’s smug Dave Skylark, are generally unlikable. There is also reliance on repeating the same juvenile jokes throughout the film, most of which fall flat. Let’s not pretend that this film was making a political statement. It’s not. It chose Kim Jong-un to lampoon, but none of the parody or comedy is political in nature. There is a very naive assessment of the political situation, just used as a foundation for Rogen/Franco to lay all their Lord of the Rings references and penis jokes on. Perhaps the best aspect of the film was the fascinating and embarrassing emails leaked from studio executives at Sony Pictures, as a result of cyberhacking in response to the film. However, putting all the degradation of international relations and the emails about Angelina Jolie and Leonardo DiCaprio aside, and reviewing it as just an ordinary film, it is simply a mediocre comedy. It is what I’ve come to expect from Rogen and Franco in recent years, which is a shame, since they’ve done some great things in the past. I expected casual misogyny, extensive innuendos, jokes that go on for too long, bad accents and celebrity cameos. Sadly, I got exactly what I expected.

Leelah Alcorn remembered in student organised vigil

0

A vigil organised by Oxford undergraduates was held at 1pm yesterday in Trafalgar Square to memorialise the death of Leelah Alcorn, a trans girl who committed suicide on December 28th 2014.

Leelah Alcorn, from Kings Mills, Ohio, was found dead on the Interstate 71, having killed herself. In a pre-scheduled post on Tumblr published after her death, Alcorn wrote, “The only way I will rest in peace is if one day transgender people aren’t treated the way I was, they’re treated like humans, with valid feelings and human rights. Gender needs to be taught about in schools, the earlier the better. My death needs to mean something. My death needs to be counted in the number of transgender people who commit suicide this year. I want someone to look at that number and say ‘that’s fucked up’ and fix it. Fix society. Please.”

Two Oxford students, Rowan Davis and Kae Smith, were involved in the organisation of the vigil. The two told Cherwell, “In her widely publicised final words published on her Tumblr blog [since removed from the social media site], she gave the cause of death as a lack of access to trans related healthcare and the associated sense of helplessness in the face of systemic transmisogyny. In light of Leelah’s death, there has been an unprecedented outpouring of grief and anger by the trans community and its allies, with well known celebrities such as Stephen Fry and Laverne Cox voicing their anger across social media platforms.

“In addition to this a petition, which currently has around 200,000 signatures, has been produced that calls for an end to transgender conversion therapy, one of the direct causes of Leelah’s hopelessness. Finally there have been candlelit vigils across the world, the largest being the ‘Stand Up 4 Leelah Candle Vigil’ in Columbus, Ohio on January 2nd.”

Davis explained the purpose of the vigil, “First it is there simply to remember a life cut so short by someone that shared our struggles, a girl killed by systemic transmisogyny. Second it is there to remind people that her death was a political death, that when a member of our community is brutalised at the hands of oppression we must all fight back. Third it is a reminder to other folks that we are more than just individuals in this struggle, that as a community we are stronger and that we can create positive change.

“It is deeply saddening that Leelah’s parents are still refusing to give her the basic respect she deserves, even in death, and so the fourth purpose of this vigil is to do what they will not and mourn a sister.” 

Smith further commented, “Leelah left us with an instruction to ‘fix society’. This vigil, as well as remembering her, is hopefully the starting position to a place change where we won’t see another dead Trans teen, a murdered Trans woman of colour, improved health care, understanding of Trans issues and people away from a fixation on our genitals to our lived experience.

“Rest in power, Leelah.”

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10747%%[/mm-hide-text]

Statistics published in January 2014 found that 41 per cent of those who responded to the US-based National Transgender Discrimination Survey reported a suicide attempt. This is in contrast to the 10 per cent to 20 per cent of lesbian, gay and bisexual adults who reported an attempted suicide, and the 4.6 per cent of the overall population of the USA who reported an attempted suicide.

Attendees of the vigil left candles, flowers and other messages. Over 400 people were marked as attending the vigil on the Facebook event.

Review: An Evening with The Cure

★★★★☆

Gigs that are organised by Robert Smith are not for the faint hearted. Some more senior lead singers are happy with bashing out a few greatest hits, departing as fast as they can from the stage clutching a wad of money and leaving a crowd dissatisfied.

But The Cure are no such band. Despite being an entity for nearly forty years, their setlists have only ever grown. And the first of their three night residency at the Hammersmith Apollo is no exception.  The band clearly cares about their fans. Yes, they played hits. ‘Lullaby’ was hypnotising as ever. ‘Boys Don’t Cry’ prompts the usual vocal imitation of the bands trademark guitar riff . ‘Pictures of You’, no matter how many times I’ve seen it performed, is always beautiful and tear jerking. But this mammoth forty song, three-and-a-bit hour set is packed with rarities galore. Casual and dire-hard fans are appeased alike and neither can complain that they don’t get their sixty quid worths of live music. ‘A Man Inside My Mouth’ makes its first funky-synth live debut ever at the Hammersmith. “It’s nice to play some different stuff”, Smith quips in a brief remark to the crowd as he takes a brief break from his adorable teddy-bear like dancing. The Cure have toured pretty much constantly since 2011, but it’s so refreshing to see a classic band not rattling through the same set gig after gig. For once, there is an element of surprise for an audience used to being able to check setlists with a swish and a flick of a Smartphone.

There’s something here for everyone, songs from every album of their career appearing at some point in the set. I mean, with four encores, how could their not be at least one of your favourites played at some point? As a lover of their earlier work, it was great to hear ‘M’ and ‘Three Imaginary Boys’ finally make their way back into their set after a lengthy and unjust absence. Likewise, 1981’s standalone single ‘Charlotte Sometimes’ sounded sublime, oozing with gothic delight as the stage fills with dry ice and the dirge-like synth kicks in.

However, admittedly, listening to The Top played in full was not quite as enjoyable. The band have always steered clear of playing the majority of the album live since it was released. “We haven’t played this one since we last played here in 1984”, remarks Smith before breaking into yet another such track. And as ‘Give Me It’ closes the main set, I understand why. The album has some great songs, performed to a tee on the night. ‘The Caterpillar’, with it’s chaotic piano is heart-warming, whilst ‘Shake Dog Shake’ works great as a wickedly sleazy opener to the night. But playing the whole thing in one night? A bit too far I thought at the time.

But then Smith comes back on stage wielding a child’s spinning top. I thought I’d tripped out momentarily or died and gone to a Cure themed heaven. I mean, seeing any fifty-something year old man bearing a child’s toy is a somewhat odd sight, let alone when it is brandished by a lipstick-wearing musical genius on the stage of the Hammersmith Apollo. He holds it to the mic, cranks it up and the haunting desolation of ‘The Top’ begins to unfurl before us. The song is lament of desertion, of isolation in a barren and empty world. I’ve waited years to hear it live. Not only do I finally understand the pun in the title now, but I realise that someone else must feel the same way about other songs I don’t particularly like myself. As well as clearly enjoying themselves throughout the entire set, the band make a huge effort so that everyone there enjoys themselves. Yes, the set was eclectic and bizarre in places, but so well preformed I could have happily stood there for another two hours and basked in their blissful musical beauty. Although, please, please don’t shout ‘Lovesong’ next time, Rob. It’s a romantic number, not a football chant.    

Hip-hop rivalry: alive and well at 20

0

In 1995, The Notorious B.I.G. released a B-side called ‘Who Shot Ya?‘ and hip-hop changed. Two months earlier, friend-turned-rival Tupac had been shot five times in a robbery in Manhattan, and despite claims from Biggie that the song had been recorded before the incident, there was no escaping the implications in the song’s lyrics (“Who shot ya? Separate the weak from the obsolete” and “I’m Crooklyn’s finest/You rewind this, Bad Boy’s behind this” – hardly subtle). Tupac responded with a diss of his own, and the most famous feud in music was born.

The 90s were the glory days of hip-hop rivalry. Before the bullets flew, infamously, between East and West Coast, it was lyrics that made or broke careers. If earlier beefs involving the likes of KRS-One and LL Cool J had been the birth of the diss track, songs threatening serious violence like Tupac’s ‘Hit Em Up’, Mobb Deep’s ‘Shook Ones Pt. 2’ and ‘Who Shot Ya?’ represented its baptism of fire, pushing things in a new direction. Tupac vs. Biggie, Death Row vs. Bad Boy Records, Suge Knight vs. Puff Daddy; aggression was the new flavour of hip-hop, and it didn’t exactly hurt record sales either. Over the next 20 years, the players would change but the game would remain much the same.

Interestingly, perhaps the most notorious diss released after Biggie and Tupac’s deaths – Nas’ ‘Ether‘ – wasn’t aimed at the other side of America, but at fellow New York rapper Jay-Z, by then well-established but yet to release The Blueprint. A song of extreme vitriol which dripped homophobia and misogyny, ‘Ether’ nonetheless eviscerated Jay. With a hook consisting of a distorted sample of Tupac shouting “Fuck Jay-Z” between verses in which Nas accused him of stealing from KRS-One and hijacking Biggie’s legacy, the song was released on Jay’s birthday. It was the seminal, classic diss.

Around the same time, Eminem was changing the game. Unafraid to attack and offend pretty much anyone, including non-hip-hop targets like Moby, Christina Aguilera, Dick Cheney and, famously, his ex-wife Kim and his own mother, Em’s disses would often call out multiple figures in pop culture over the course of perhaps 16 bars before he turned his attention to something completely different (the best-known examples being ‘The Real Slim Shady’ and ‘Without Me’: “You waited this long, now stop debating/Cos I’m back, I’m on the rag and ovulating/I know that you got a job Ms Cheney/But your husband’s heart problem’s complicating/So the FCC won’t let me be/Or let me be me, so let me see/They tried to shut me down on MTV/But it feels so empty without me”).

It was this hyperactive, shameless assault on what seemed like anyone who came into Slim Shady’s consciousness as he rapped that made him so popular, though that’s not to say Eminem couldn’t lay down something more traditional and less erratic. He proved that during his feud with rapper/producer Benzino and The Source magazine during Benzino’s tenure as editor via ‘The Sauce’, a track often credited with destroying the publication’s credibility.

Nowadays the double effect of worldwide success – with the hundreds of millions of fans and also significant respect from other rappers that it entails – has meant that Eminem has toned things down and pretty much retired from sparring (with an unbeaten record, incidentally). Though his protégée 50 Cent has resolutely carried on his feud with Compton rapper Game, things are quiet at Shady Records these days. It’s a younger generation who provides the drama in hip-hop now.

In a sense, things are different from before. The most sensational “diss” in the last couple of years was Kendrick Lamar’s infamous verse on Big Sean’s ‘Control’, which wasn’t exactly a diss but more of a call-out to pretty much every young rapper on the scene right now in one breath (J. Cole, Big K.R.I.T., Wale, Pusha T, Meek Mill, A$AP Rocky, Drake, Big Sean, Jay Electronica, Mac Miller and Tyler, the Creator, to be precise). The internet suffered paroxysms of joy when the verse came out, followed by further joy at the responses of a number of the rappers named over the next few weeks, rising to Kendrick’s challenge. The verse was good-natured, though, if competitive, and to find real venom one has to look elsewhere.

Enter the G.O.O.D. Music-Young Money beef. Originating between veteran Common and YM golden boy Drake, their respective labelmates Pusha T and Lil’ Wayne were quick to get involved. The feud has bubbled under the surface for a few years now, surfacing openly every now and then to produce quality disses like Wayne’s ‘Ghoulish’, and Pusha T’s ‘Don’t Fuck With Me’ and ‘Exodus 23:1’. Pusha seems to go in harder than the others, for some reason (“Fuck you playing games for?/ Don’t be scared, get everything you came for/They got you talking that big shit/Little do you know we don’t miss shit/Them n****s using you as a pawn/You see they never loaded their guns/Now you out here all by yourself/Ask Steve Jobs, wealth don’t buy health”).

Common kills it on ‘Sweet‘ too, though he finds it hard to find new material to diss Drake with. After all, the Toronto rapper is hip-hop Marmite – you love him or you hate him – and he has beef past and present with almost everyone around. Everything that can be said against him already has, numerous times. Including open and veiled attacks in the media and on wax, Drake’s been dissed by Chris Brown, Common, Pusha T, Ludacris, Jay-Z, DMX, Kanye and even labelmate Tyga (“I don’t like Drake as a person. He’s just fake to me.”). Tyga’s attack, which extended to Nicki Minaj, is symptomatic of YMCMR’s tendency to fight in-house – Wayne’s rapidly-escalating dispute with label head Birdman is only the latest in a series of not-so-veiled shots within the label.

Where Pusha T is keeping the traditional diss alive and well, there are others dragging the proud tradition of hip-hop beef through the gutter. Self-proclaimed Queen of Twitter Azealia Banks has managed over the last two years to perfect the art of attacking other artists despite not actually releasing her debut album until this November. Of targets including Angel Haze, Action Bronson, Kreayshawn, T.I., Nicki Minaj, Jim Jones, A$AP Rocky and Iggy Azalea, only the last two really justified any attack from the vituperative rapper, and Bronson’s reaction to her was one of ridicule rather than any serious consternation. Most of the others pointed to her lack of a major hit besides ‘212’. Banks is proof that rappers can embarrass themselves by launching attacks, too.

Beef is an integral part of hip-hop. Much like how technology advances fastest during periods of warfare, so rappers improve and write better when they have something to prove and someone to put back in their place. That’s not to say advocating rivalry equates to advocating violence – the two biggest names in the history of the genre both had lives cut tragically short allegedly as a result of the East-West Coast feud, but even then it could be argued that their fame was enhanced thanks to it.

Ultimately, Kendrick has the right attitude on ‘Control’ – competition makes you raise your game and calling out those other rappers raised not only his profile but theirs too. It benefits everyone, not least fans of those involved, and should be lauded for happening now as it happened twenty years ago. Jay-Z put it best when he reminisced about Biggie in a 2012 interview with MTV, “You’re just as good as your competition around you. You know when someone else pushes you to really step your game up? That song, it was so crazy. It just had an effect on everybody. The world stopped when he dropped ‘Who Shot Ya’.”

"Music from another planet": the allure of ‘ugly’ music

0
The other day a friend asked me, “Why do you only listen to ugly music?” In his defence, I was listening to one of the more improvisational tracks from Arca’s Blade Runner OST by way of Berghain, Xen. Yet, it still seemed to me an odd question considering some of the most important and influential records of the last couple of years (Kanye’s My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy and Yeezus; Kendrick’s Good Kid M.A.A.D City and Drake’s Take Care) could hardly be described as ‘easy-listening’, with pop production becoming more and more experimental and challenging, borrowing more and more from ‘underground’ music, and the legacies of each of these albums reaching further and further into both mainstream commercial music and independent releases. 
 
Similarly, I’d be lying if I said that my favourite artists from this period (to add to those I have already mentioned); Death Grips, the reformed Swans, the aforementioned Arca, Evian Christ, Rustie and Hudson Mohawke, were not equally challenging and unconventional in their production. Any one of these artists’ music could arguably be described as ‘ugly’ or as bearing a certain grotesque aesthetic, be that Death Grips’ half-spat tales of decapitated prostitutes and male coat-hanger abortions, Hudson Mohawke’s maximal, obnoxious, border-line offensive production and Kanye West’s original creative decision for the cover of My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy to depict himself fucking a gryphon. It is therefore not hard to appreciate why my friend – a House and Minimal Techno obsessive – described the music I like to listen to as ‘ugly’. But despite how you may feel about this ‘ugliness’, it is undeniably alluring, and it definitely sells.
 
2014 has variously been described as “Post-Ringtone”, “The year of the body” and, my personal favourite, “The waking dream between Kanye albums”. Yet if we are to term this new wave of popular music as grotesque or misshapen, I would suggest it would be just as valid to describe this year as ‘The year of ugly’. 
 
The best example of this might be Arca’s Xen, a patchwork of fractured beats, cacophonous piano lines and colossal walls of static noise. With Kanye West’s reputation of having a supernatural ear for musical trends, often dictating how much of the popular music of the preceding few years sounds with each album release, it is hardly surprising that West would enlist this producer du jour as ‘production consultant’ on the Frankenstein’s monster of noise that is Yeezus. The Venezuelan artist’s relationship with the grotesque can be traced back to 2012 and the beginning of much collaboration with housemate and graphic designer-cum-visual artist, Jesse Kanda. The elongated, warped and disfigured limbs depicted in the artwork for Arca’s EP’s Stretch 1 and Stretch 2, as well as the acid-tinged mindfuckery of the accompanying video to Arca’s &&&&& mix, depicting extreme close-ups of disembodied uvulas, strobe lighting and what can only be described as giant, rotting children break-dancing have a symbiotic relationship with the sonic disfigurement that is Arca’s calling card. This has been amplified more recently by the sexless, genderless, voluptuous monstrosity that is the graphic rendering of his alter-ego, ‘Xen’. Kanda is not only able to visually, perfectly capture Arca’s sound; he effectively creates an environment where this ‘ugliness’ is not only alluring but also erotic – less ugly, more fetishistic. 
 
 
A similarly symbiotic visual and sonic aesthetic, as well as a certain element of fetish, can be found in the artists that make up the P.C. Music label, the source of both some of the most exciting and frankly ridiculous music of 2014. This is sex-music for video game characters, a soundtrack for bad ecstasy or bubble-gum-with-razorblades-in pop music – songs that are at once upbeat and catchy yet depict a weird and artificial world inhabited by Web-Cam porn actors and CGI architecture. Take label head A.G. Cook’s Beautiful, a song that begins with a heavenly chorus of chipmunk-voiced angels and the sounds of digital shell-casings hitting virtual concrete, coupled with an image of what looks like a gelatinous mass of melted pink pearls. Similarly, on Keri Baby, resident graphic designer and art-school oddity Hannah Diamond, whose Jeff Koons meets ‘The Sims’-style imagery provides the label with an instantly recognisable aesthetic, happily exclaims in a stuttering auto-tune addled school-girl chant: “Tell me if you want to see me play with my hair on a T.V.” This artificial sexuality is equal parts obnoxious and exciting, and whilst it may be a far cry from Arca and Jesse’s Kanda’s nightmarish vision, it is still as ‘ugly’. 
 
 
 
However, it would be somewhat of a cop-out to claim that this allure of the ‘ugly’ is simply to do with sex; a grotesque appeal to human baseness and perversion. Often the music I have described is extremely beautiful, and conventionally so. In both Arca and P.C. Music, I would argue that there is at least 30 seconds of a song you could play to your mum without fear of embarrassment and/or an assessment of your mental health. I would suggest that the answer lies, as is so often the case, with Aphex Twin. 
 
Richard D. James, A.K.A Blue Calx, Caustic Window, Power-Pill, AFX and Aphex Twin, is arguably the genesis of these acts, as well as the majority of contemporary electronic music listened to today. The distorted soundscapes of Xen would not be possible without the twisted synth manipulation of Come To Daddy and Windowlicker. In the same way, consider the similarities between both Arca and P.C. Music’s relationship with graphic design, and the collaboration between Aphex Twin and Chris Cunningham, the unofficial video artist for British ambient and electronica music. In a recent interview with Pitchfork, James addressed the current state of popular music: “The holy grail for a music fan, I think, is to hear music from another planet, which has not been influenced by us whatsoever or, even better, lots of different planets.” 
 
Here lies the crux of why I think music that could be described as ‘unlistenable’, ‘strange’ or ‘ugly’ proves to be so alluring for me. These are artists that, however successfully, try to make music that sounds inhuman. By ignoring traditional concepts of beauty, by disregarding what sounds ‘good’, they are able to make music that is not only exciting, but also weirdly addictive. Listening to these artists for the first time could indeed be said to be like stumbling upon “the holy grail”, if a distorted one, made from pixels and body fluid, rather than gold.  

Celebrity should be no barrier to leading a college

0

Alongside a fresh batch of freshers, joining Oxford next year will be former Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger, as Lady Margaret Hall’s new principal. The announcement of his appointment in mid-December raised a few suspicions, especially as to whether a mere journo is qualified to run an Oxford college.

The core issue is that many people believe that a master or principal of a college should be an academic. Here we enter a hazy realm of ‘academicness’ when deciding the worthiness of a candidate – does Rusbridger qualify as ‘academic’ enough? The fact that he held the position of editor for a major newspaper surely shows that he has the appropriate degree of intellectual rigour required for the position.

The notion that such positions must be held by straight-laced academics is not reflective of reality when we remember that our Chancellor, Lord Patten, was a career politician before joining the university.

The second concern that some people have is that Lady Margaret Hall is appointing Rusbridger for some degree of celebrity prestige. His appointment from some angles might look slightly populist, but surely most major positions at any university must consider the image that a candidate will bring.

Anyway, celebrity status isn’t necessarily negative. The ebullient mega-pop-physician Brian Cox, combining his televisual stardom with his stint this year as a professor of Physics at the University of Manchester, has been credited with a massive uptake in physics at advanced and degree levels.

Being a well-respected public figure and role model are surely qualities one would seek when appointing a master or principal of a college. It has been done time and time again at Oxford with prestigious scientists and politicians assuming the helm. Maybe I would have something to say to the contrary if James Corden, Keith Lemon or Ginger Spice were in the running, but celebrity on its own is no reason to discredit an individual when its effect can be beneficial and inspirational.

What’s more, this decision is not even a ground-breaking one: Will Hutton, principal of Hertford College, was the editor of The Observer. These newspapers, even when held up to the golden standards of this cherished publication, are no rags. Those that deride The Guardian should remember that it won the Pulitzer Prize last year for its part in revealing the governmental imposition on privacy, with which Rusbridger had personal involvement. He has even been played by Doctor Who star Peter Capaldi in the 2013 film The Fifth Estate about WikiLeaks. The values that he and his former cause represent are laudable, and his presence will surely be inspirational.

Similarly, St Anne’s principal is a former editor of the BBC’s Newsnight programme, as well as being a former Director of Programmes for Channel 4. Lord Patten too, until recently, served as Chairman of the BBC Trust. Appointing media types to these senior positions is a welcome variation from the more ‘academic’ scientists and historians that often occupy these roles.

When the question of why someone should be appointed principal is raised, it’s better to ask instead why they shouldn’t, which is often a lot more difficult to answer. I see no reason why Rusbridger shouldn’t be principal of Lady Margaret Hall, but many reasons why he should.

Reconciling the Christmas Story with the real Jerusalem

(This article was amended on 19/04/20 per the author’s request)

A couple of days ago I went to my old school’s Christmas carol service. As usual the service included all the key readings from the Christmas story. They were the same as ever, but my relationship to them had changed. I don’t remember the first time I heard the Christmas story but I must have been very young. I must have been very young when I first heard of Jerusalem and Bethlehem, but at that time they were places that only existed for me within the Christmas story. They were quasi-fictional cities where it was perpetually Christmas and angels bobbed about in the sky.

This October I visited those cities. Sitting in a carol service singing “O Little Town of Bethlehem”, it was difficult trying to reconcile the Christmassy Jerusalem and Bethlehem of my imagination with the reality. There are no angels bobbing around. Far from God seeming particularly close in these Biblical lands, it feels more like God has turned his back on them.

So when school-children all over the UK are, like I did, learning about the magical ancient Middle East with angels and wise men and miracles, I want to take this opportunity to tell three stories that took place in and around the real Jerusalem this October, two of which I witnessed for myself and one of which was related to me by a man I met in the Old City.

The Soldiers and the Women at Lion’s Gate:

For the week I was in Jerusalem I slept on a roof top in the Old City not far from the Dome of the Rock. On my second morning I woke up to hear a popping sound accompanied by angry voices chanting ‘Allahu akhbar’. It later transpired that the popping was a mix of gunfire from Israeli soldiers (shot into the air as warnings, not at the protesters) and fireworks thrown by the protestors at the soldiers. For the rest of the week the entrance to the Temple Mount was closed. Tensions were rising.

I decided to go to the Mount of the Olives since I could not get into the Temple Mount and so tried to leave the Old City via Lion’s Gate but found my way blocked by a small temporary barrier guarded by three Israeli soldiers. There were four women standing at the barrier. Three were middle aged and wearing Islamic dress. One was younger and wearing typically Western clothes.

The younger woman was saying to one of the soldiers “I need to get through.”
“No, you can’t.”
“Why?”
He didn’t answer. She looked at him for a moment then tried to get through. The soldiers moved in closer. She couldn’t pass them.

“I need to get through.”
“Where are you from?” The soldier asked her.
“Here.”
“You can’t go through.”

Just then the soldier noticed my friend and me. We’re both white.

“Tourists?” He asked.
We nodded.
“Where are you from?”
“Britain.”
“You can go through,” he said, without hesitation.

My jaw dropped.

The young Palestinian woman looked at me. I looked back. I don’t know what she was thinking.

“If they can’t go through,” I said to the soldier, “then we can’t go through.”

The Man at the Checkpoint:

This story was related to me by a man I met at my hostel. He agreed for me to tell his story but asked that I do not give his name.

This man is Czech. His last name is Arab but he speaks only Czech and some English. He was staying in Jerusalem but had gone to Ramallah in the West Bank for the day. On the bus on the way back to Jerusalem he had come to a checkpoint and Israeli soldiers had boarded the bus asking to see passports.

When the soldiers came to him they thought he was Arab and spoke to him in Arabic. When he did not understand them they grew suspicious and asked him, in English, to get off the bus to be checked more thoroughly.

The soldiers told him to go to an office and he set off in the direction he believed that office to be. After he had walked a few paces he heard angry shouting behind him.

He stopped immediately and turned round.

There was an Israeli soldier behind him. The soldier’s gun was pointing at his head.

“I’ve never been so scared in my whole life,” he told me.

It turned out he’d walked in the wrong direction.

When ,finally, he was given the all clear and was allowed to go through the checkpoint he asked where the bus was.

“It’s already left,” they told him. All of his stuff was still on the bus.

The Woman on the Mount of the Olives:

I wanted to go to the Mount of the Olives in Jerusalem to watch the sunset. My friend and I reached the top of the hill just as it was getting dark. We saw a woman at the top who looked to be having some sort of breakdown. She was sobbing, wailing, clutching on to a railing with both hands, walking but almost collapsing as she did so.

We decided to go and see if we could help. Before we reached her, though, a car pulled up alongside her. Three men jumped out and began pulling her and forcing her towards the car. She cried out and fought against them but before long they overpowered her. They bundled her inside and drove off at high speed.

My friend and I memorised the car’s number plate and I called the police. The woman who was abducted was Muslim and the neighbourhood was majority Palestinian but we had to call the Israeli police as there are no Palestinian emergency services in Jerusalem.

The woman who responded to my emergency call spoke limited English. We weren’t getting anywhere so I said “I speak Arabic”, thinking that we might go faster this way.

“No. No Arabic.” She sounded almost offended that I’d suggested it.

I was stunned – perhaps naively. How can you have an emergency response team that speaks no Arabic in a city where roughly one third of the residents are Arabic speakers, the majority of whom do not speak Hebrew?

I didn’t believe this phonecall had helped anything so I spoke to some policemen on the street. At first they were keen to listen and to help. Their interest, however, died when they realised the woman was Palestinian and not a tourist as they had first thought.

By this point I had very little hope. If something awful was going to happen to that woman, it would probably have happened by now. Still, I wanted someone to listen to what we had seen and to take it seriously. I wanted someone to care about that woman.

As a last effort we went to the police station just outside of the Old City. To get into the police station you need to first explain why you are there to a security guard outside. The security guard, however, speaks no Arabic. Unless you are a Hebrew speaker, it is very difficult to report a crime.

We waited half an hour before they found an Arabic speaker to translate into Hebrew for us. Eventually we were let into the police station. One policeman listened to us and took us seriously. The rest were unconcerned. Nothing was done. The security guard was laughing at us.

When I got back to my hostel in the Old City I told the man at the reception, a Palestinian, what had happened. I asked if there was anything else I could try, someone else who could help.

“No,” he said, shaking his head. “The police are the police. It was a Palestinian area; they aren’t going to do anything.”

I left Jerusalem the next day.

Who says who’s free?

I arrived in Jordan with the firm belief that life would be less free here than it was back in the UK. This belief was, in fact, so ingrained within me that I didn’t even realise I possessed it, let alone think to question it.

Indeed at first I saw nothing to prompt me to question it. Even before I moved to Jordan I began to feel incredibly claustrophobic. I’d been reading the guidebooks: don’t show skin, don’t wear your hair down, don’t smile at men, they told me. I went shopping for appropriate clothes and a year’s supply of hair ties: it didn’t feel like me and I felt restricted in a way I’d never really felt restricted before.

Once I had arrived, I felt trapped by the street harassment which prevented me, at first, from venturing out alone after dark; I felt trapped in the heat by the need to keep covered; I felt trapped by the lack of any real public transport which left me searching for taxis to get around; I felt trapped by the inappropriate questions aimed at me once I’d found a taxi (about whether I drink, have sex, have a boyfriend, want a husband and so forth). On the 15th September 2014, I wrote in my diary, “I want to write that I’m feeling exhilarated and full of the spirit of adventure, but actually I’m feeling very fragile, a bit on edge… It’s hard because I can’t do what I normally do when I feel like this: I can’t go for a run, or go for a walk by myself without hassle, or take a long, hot bath.” (Water is very limited in Jordan.)

As I settled into life here, however, my perspective began to change, or at least become more complex. Is life less free in Jordan than in the UK? Or does my own life here only feel less free because of the specific freedoms that I have been conditioned to value most highly?

It was a conversation I had with a nineteen year old Jordanian girl that really prompted these thoughts.

“I’m hoping to go and study in Germany,” she told me, “But I’m worried it’ll be really strict there.” 

“Oh no, it’s definitely much less strict than life here,” I reassured her, “It’s more like the UK.” 

“But what about time?” she asked me. 

“What about it?” I was confused.

 “It matters so much in Europe. Every minute.”

She was thinking about freedom so differently from me. Time in Jordan matters, obviously, but she’s right that there isn’t the same obsession with it as in the UK, and she’s also right that an obsessive need to keep to time could well be considered a restriction of freedom.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10748%%[/mm-hide-text]

“You can wear what you want in Germany and people are less strict about alcohol and clubs and all that kind of thing,” I said.

“Yes but there are so many rules,” she responded,  “like about where you can or cannot go, how fast you can drive, wearing a seat belt, health and safety…”

Again, she was right, and if she values freedom of movement and freedom from bureaucracy more highly than freedom of dress (which she’s perfectly within her rights to do), then I do not doubt that she would find life in the UK far less free than her life in Jordan. Moreover, I’m sure that she would not be the only Jordanian to think this way and my smug assumption that my own country had freedom mostly sussed began to fray at the edges.

On top of this, I became increasingly aware that some of the greatest restrictions on my own freedom in Amman are not evidence of a general lack of freedom among Jordanians or Jordanian women; they are specific restrictions faced by Western women, or women who look “typically” Western. Walking down the streets, minding my own business, I have been followed, touched, spat on, kissed and proposed to. In taxis, I have been treated as nothing more than a sex object. This is not freedom. At first I believed this is the experience of most women in Amman, but eventually I realised that this is (in general) the experience of women who don’t look typically Arab.

Who’s to blame for this restriction on my freedom? Obviously, each offending man must bear some responsibility, but in general they are acting in accordance with a stereotype of Western women promulgated by my own Western culture — by the music videos, the magazines and the porn films produced by the culture I was born into. When I’m sitting in the back of a taxi and the driver seems surprised that I’m not willing to have sex after chatting for five minutes, or when I’m walking home and a middle-aged man pulls over in his car and seems offended when I refuse to climb inside, I wonder why the hell they ever thought, indeed expected, that I would be so willing. Is it because my own culture never gave them any indication that I would or even could say no? So yes, I may feel significantly less free in Jordan, but how far is my own culture to blame?

This post is obviously not intended to offer any conclusive opinion about whether life in the UK or in Jordan is the most free. It’s just an illustration of how my views and values are being challenged and questioned. I arrived in Jordan with a sense that I was free in the UK and would not be free in Jordan and that that was an uncomplicated issue. Now I wonder why it is that I feel more free in the UK than in Jordan and whether the same culture that I consider to be free is really the driving force behind the harassment obstructing my freedom in daily life in Amman.

7 resolutions for the everyday Oxonian

0

No one actually does New Year’s Resolutions anymore, mainly because all the ones people are coming up with are extremely boring. Whilst learning a language, eating healthily, going to the gym more often, and stopping smoking/ binge drinking/ bringing flamethrowers to bops are all laudable goals, we all know they’re NOT going to happen.

Here’s an alternative list of better resolutions for 2015.

1. Take more selfies (but get a selfie stick).

Yes, I am from the Philippines, selfie capital of the world. Yes, I know I look like a tourist and I am okay with that. No, I do not have a selfie stick because I have short arms.

2014 was dubbed “the year of the selfie”, but I assure you, 2015 will be the year of the selfie stick. I’m sure even the least self-confident person secretly likes to take selfies. At some point, you have to learn to love yourself, and what better way than first learning to love the thing you see in the mirror every day? Fun fact: your selfies might look odd to you because you always see your face mirrored (left-right reversed) when you look in a mirror, so for the selfie-unconfident, just take selfies on Snapchat, so it’s mirrored and looking the way you always see you.

People think the selfie is just for self-obsessed good-looking people, but I beg to disagree. One does not use the selfie to flaunt one’s good looks; one uses the selfie to record an event, good times with friends, and great new places one finds in Oxford (see next resolution). But take heed, please don’t take a selfie of you putting on an ugly face (known as an ‘uglie’) – that was SO 2014. And please, if your arms aren’t long enough to get all your friends AND the view behind you… get a selfie stick! You don’t want to be that guy that cuts out your least important friends in photos. I promise it’s not narcissi-stick.

Disclaimer: This article was not sponsored by any companies selling selfie sticks. 

2. Actually go and visit places in Oxford.

Where are you going to take selfies if not around one of the best tourist destinations in the UK? Oxford is actually home to so many wonders, and it shocks me how many people (freshers, I’m looking at you!) haven’t visited them.

Got a bike? Cycle to Port Meadow, Blenheim Palace, and Brookes.  If you have a friend at St. Hugh’s (lol, what?), visit them and see all 10.5 acres of garden. It’s bigger than Trinity’s lawns and you can actually walk on the grass.

Food lover? Have breakfast at Tick Tock Café (the walls are covered in funky clocks), lunch at Turl Street Kitchen (great for social justice), and dinner at Gee’s (super expensive but also super classy). All over Oxford there are hidden gems of places we just walk by all the time: Zappi’s Bike Café (want to have coffee while surrounded by the smell of rubber tyres?), Vaults & Garden (lunch by the Rad Cam is incredible), and Edamame (very intimate – do not take anyone whose personal bubble you are not willing to enter).

Nutella lover? Go to the Pizza Artisan van outside Christ Church and buy a £6 pizza called ‘Fifty Shades of Nutella,’ which is a pizza base with nothing but Nutella on top, with mascarpone cheese optional. Then take a selfie of it and tweet it with #50shadesofnutella. I promise you a satisfied tummy and diabetes within two years.

3. Post things on OAOU.

The number of posts on the infamous ‘Overheard at Oxford Uni’ seems to be declining, despite this activity being one’s one-way ticket to BNOC-hood. Do continue to post things on there, but please make sure they are actually relevant/ funny/ interesting. First one to post a selfie on OAOU wins at life (okay, I’ll stop with the selfie talk now). 

4. Talk about mental health and disabilities.

TW: Discussion of Mental Health and Suicide

We worry a lot about our physical health. Many New Year’s Resolutions include not smoking, exercising more, and eating healthily. Of course, those are important things; we want to invest in a healthier old age free from strokes and heart attacks. But what about now? The biggest killer of men and women in the UK in the 20 to 34-year olds is actually suicide, according to the Office for National Statistics. As around 90% of people who die by suicide have mental health problems, we really should be tackling this major health problem.

We talk a lot about a five a day of fruit and vegetables for our physical health, while we don’t have a similar five a day for our mental health. For the record, some people have come up with a five a day for mental health: connect with others around you, be active, take notice of yourself, the world around you and the positives in your life, keep learning and give time to yourself and to others, one random act of kindness at a time. Have a friend who is struggling? Speak to them about it. Ask someone how they are and never invalidate their feelings. If things seem particularly bad, take any warning signs seriously. Remember, this could save someone’s life.

 5. Be a social justice advocate, and not just a keyboard warrior.

Sometimes, with the short terms that we have, soul-crushing deadlines, and far too many an essay crisis, it is tempting to care about no one but yourself. But the world has so many issues out there that even the most privileged, wealthy, cisgender, heterosexual, white, public school-educated and able-bodied male should be able to find a problem that they will find difficult to ignore.

But to those who are already on Tumblr and are already advocates for social issues (especially for issues to do with gender and sexual identity), can we please stop with the infighting? To people in the cis-gay male community, a friendly reminder that transphobia and cultural appropriation of Women of Colour is not okay. To the wider LGBTQ community, not everyone is sexual, and asexuality does exist. To monosexuals, biphobia is wrong. To everyone else, intersectionality (e.g. being both black and lesbian, Asian and hard of hearing, trans* and Muslim, etc.) does exist, and it does make life hard for people who live at such intersections.

Also, just because most people in Oxford are not dying from starvation, malnutrition, and malaria does not mean that issues such as homelessness, being more environmentally sustainable, and the Living Wage campaign are not important. In 2015, resolve to be more actively involved and more educated on all issues, not just those which affect you personally. 

6. Have More College Rivalry (But Stop with the Brookes Bashing)

Yes, it is perfectly okay to mock Pembroke for being the stupidest college and to hate on (read: become extremely jealous of) Merton for getting to the top of Norrington. (Like anyone reads that anymore? Oh wait.)

People have become too tame nowadays. Gone now are the days of Lincolnites leaving Brasenostrils to die by the hands of the townies. No longer do Pembrokians paint Christ Church cows pink, forcing Christ Church to retaliate by throwing Pembroke cats off Tom Tower.

To the Christ Church medic that stole a Lincoln plate, good on you. To the LMH medic that urinated into the pond in Tom Quad at Christ Church, shame on you. You know who you are.

 

7. Write for (Good) Student Publications

Join OSPL (not to be confused with OSFL) and any of its wonderful publications: Cherwell, Bang!, Industry and The Isis (not to be confused with that other ISIS).

Oxford Student Publications Limited is independent from the university, unlike certain publications (you know which one I’m talking about). OSPL is the powerhouse of Oxford’s only independent student newspaper, the oldest independent student magazine in the United Kingdom (the unfortunately-named ISIS), the only student magazine dedicated to science, the most popular fashion magazine (Industry), and even the best freshers’ guides that Oxford has ever seen – Keep off the Grass.

If Sylvia Plath, Nigella Lawson, George Osborne, Rupert Murdoch, W.H. Auden, and Evelyn Waugh have all contributed to OSPL, then obviously, so should you. Make it a New Year’s Resolution to write for good publications. 

Happy New Year!