Monday 7th July 2025
Blog Page 1319

Oxford the second-most expensive university for freshers?

0

In a recently published study of twenty major British universities by HSBC Oxford came out as second most expensive. According to the data Oxford has a weekly cost of £273, narrowly behind UCL and Imperial’s first-place £283 but far ahead of Cambridge’s £220.

Multiplying by 52 to transform this into annual terms, it would seem to suggest an annual cost of living of over £14,000. The University currently estimates that the cost of living for a student in 2014/5 will be between £8,000 and £12,000. From personal experience even this may be too high. The problem is with how the HSBC figures were calculated.

Take the ‘travel pass’. Probably influenced by London universities, where students often have to live away from central London and thus commute daily, HSBC added the cost of a ‘weekly travel pass’ to its calculations. For Oxford this is £16 a week. However, this cost is largely irrelevant for most; the majority of Oxford students are able to walk or cycle to any place in the city. Even St Hugh’s isn’t more than a 30 minute walk away.

Also included is the cost of ‘study essentials.’ Again, this may be redundant when it comes to Oxford. As a historian I have a weekly reading list of about a dozen books yet I have never had to buy a single one of them; the Bodleian Library holds eleven million of them. Even if I did, my college, like most others, provides a generous grant for purchasing academic material.

Most importantly however is the fact that this data was calculated as a weekly cost, not an annual one. Oxford terms are significantly shorter than elsewhere, and even with an extra week for Prelims (exams taken at the end of the first year) students won’t generally spend more than 30 weeks a year in the city. For instance unlike private accommodation in many other universities, in Oxford you only pay rent during term time.

If we reduce the weekly cost to £250 (minus 16 for the travel pass and another 7 for study essentials), then multiply it by 30 weeks we get £7,500 a year. This seems to be significantly closer to the truth than the other calculations.

I spent around £7,000 this year while studying at Oxford, which includes unexpected trips to both Albania and Poland. If I hadn’t paid for that, and also had either the skill or the motivation to cook for myself, I could easily have done it for less than £6,000.

Neither can we forget grants. While many grants are available to all EU students regardless of the university, some are funded directly by Oxford. For instance the ‘Oxford bursary’ pays up to £4,000 in the first year.

So my advice to all potential freshers thinking of applying to Oxford is simple: don’t panic about the cost. Combining adequate budgeting with grants will get you through. Concentrate instead on choosing a degree you’ll enjoy.

Fashion’s magical flight into Autumn/Winter

0

With summer over as measured by degrees Celsius, it is time for our pedicured toes and tanned legs to retreat to boots and opaque black tights, and to pull out our coats and knitwear from the wardrobe – only this season in fashion, the winter wardrobe has become a magical portal to a Narnia-like land.

A departure from practical and more earthly tailored dressing is a somewhat unexpected turn of events in the narrative of Autumn/Winter minimalism and androgynous style that rejects the razzmatazz of fashion, leaving the fairytale frocks to haute couture. 

Alexander McQueen’s creative director Sarah Burton conjured up a spellbinding collection which managed to draw on lots of different fairytale elements and tap into the distinctly dark and otherworldly McQueen DNA – seen best in the feathered gowns and bird-wing headpieces from his 2006 A/W show, which ended with a touch of techno-magic in the form of a Kate Moss hologram.

This year’s show had a more mythical, almost Tolkien feel, with forest land strewn across the catwalk and Game of Thrones inspired hairstyles. Burton’s dark hooded furs combined the innocence of Little Red Riding Hood with the big, bad wolf, whilst the sprinkling of lighter, folkish white dresses embroidered with stars and moons, harmonized the earthly with the intergalactic- a thread also running through the collections of JW Anderson, Matthew Williamson and Stella McCartney, whose star-patterned platform brogues elevated the models into the stratosphere.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10062%%[/mm-hide-text]

Over in “Enchanted Sicily”, Dolce & Gabbana’s Autumn/Winter show recreated the world of the Brothers Grimm, featuring Cinderella-esque slippers as well as yet more hooded furs and capes. Joining Little Red Riding Hood were a whole host of other characters, all parading to the soundtrack of ‘The Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy’ and ‘The Nutcracker’ – from the small felt owls and other woodland creatures appliquéd on the capes to the models in jewel-encrusted gauntlets and open visored headwear, who gallantly strode down the catwalk like fairytale heroines, unlocking imaginary castles with the gold and silver key-print dresses.  

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10061%%[/mm-hide-text]

Fashion house Valentino also appeared to have fallen under the fairies’ spell, seen with magical lace-edged gowns decorated with birds, lions, flamingos and unicorns, which were woven in with the more fundamental wardrobe pieces comprising of structured coats and block colour shift dresses. This demonstrates how minimalist trends can be woven into this latest fantastical vogue, rooting the vision in a wearable, and ultimately saleable form.

The Fall collection for Valentino’s sister label, Red Valentino, was inspired specifically by the Disney tale of Snow White, and featured red bows, tote bags stamped with the disney princess’s visage and whimsical clutch bags reading “Once Upon a Time” and “The Fairest of Them All” – printed on metallic leather like a modern magic mirror.

But what has prompted all these designers to take a leaf out of the Grimm Brothers’ tales is mystifyingly unexplained in a fashion climate seemingly monopolised by minimalist style – from Celine’s sleek signature look to high street brand COS’s cult of women in uniformly pared-down, androgynous outfits.

It seems that despite the growing market for unisex wear and gender-neutral fashion, and the ‘Normcore’ movement (responsible for rebranding Mark Zuckerberg as a fashion icon), fashion remains for designers like the late McQueen and now his successor Sarah Burton, “a form of escapism”.  

Having had my childhood fairy wings pulled down to earth only by the practicalities of daily life, this new whimsical direction has given me the fashion imperative to reopen the dressing up box and dust off my own collection of princess dresses. If they say dress for the job you want, not the job you have, then these latest collections say dress for the life you want, and the ‘happy ever after’ you’re after.

Oxford’s literary ghosts

0

When you study at Oxford, it’s impossible not to think of the generations of Oxonians who trod the cobbled streets and beheld the dreaming spires before you.  But what of our fictional friends? Let’s take a look at the well-known literary characters who had their own Oxford experiences.

Charles Ryder and Sebastian Flyte in Brideshead Revisited by Evelyn Waugh

Seemingly the only chapter for which this (actually rather long) novel is remembered, Et in Arcadio Ego narrates Charles and Sebastian’s carefree days at Hertford and Christ Church. Bullingdon Club escapades, a daily glass of champagne and very little essay writing characterise these two dandies’ Oxford experience…until real life kicks in.

John Kemp in Jill by Philip Larkin

Less of a rose-tinted idyll than the Oxford of Brideshead, the university town of this novel is a battlefield, metaphorically and literally (it’s set during WWII). Kemp, from a deprived background in Lancashire is thrown into a world of privilege, social awkwardness and thwarted love. Larkin himself wrote the novel during his time at Oxford so his own university experience informed that of his literary counterpart. Layered.

Jude Fawley in Jude the Obscure by Thomas Hardy

We have all been through the trials of trying to secure that coveted place at Oxford. But chances are none of us had it as bad as the protagonist of Hardy’s tragic novel. The attempts of Jude, a working-class stonemason, to become a scholar at Christminster, an alias for Oxford, are perpetually unfulfilled. They are also the mere backdrop to his other woes, including incest, religious guilt, infanticide and suicide.

Zuleika Dobson in Zuleika Dobson by Max Beerbohm

Beerbohm’s Edwardian satire may share suicide with Jude the Obscure, but that’s where their similarities end. The ravishing good looks of its eponymous heroine win her a place at the all-male Oxford. All the undergraduates become completely besotted with the femme fatale, even though some of them haven’t actually met her, and decide to throw themselves into the River Isis to prove their love. The Oxford dons fail to notice the mass apocalypse of their students, but Zuleika is off…to Cambridge.

Harriet Vane in Gaudy Night by Dorothy L. Sayers

The politics of academic life come to play in Dorothy L. Sayers’ murder-mystery-without-a-murder. Harriet Vane comes back to her alma mater of Shrewsbury College (a fictionalized version of Somerville) to discover a budding College scandal, replete with poison pen letters, death threats and vandalism and does everything she can to stop it erupting, with the help of Lord Peter Wimsey himself. Not only this it tense psychological thriller and touching love story, but a proto-feminist philosophical novel. Nevertheless, the over-arching moral of the novel seems to be: don’t trust the college staff.

Hilton Soames in Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of Three Students by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Lord Peter Wimsey isn’t the only detective to uncover the filthy undercurrents of Oxford academic life. Everyone’s favourite sleuth, Sherlock, is summoned by an Oxford tutor/lecturer to investigate which of his three students has gained access to his study in order to get a sneaky peak at the exam paper they are all due to sit the following day: the hard-working athlete, the reticent hermit or the talented waster. It may not be the most riveting and action-packed of Sherlock Holmes’ cases, but it’s an interesting character study of Oxford undergrads.

The nameless narrator in The Oxford Murders by Guillermo Martínez

As you may be able to guess, this novel involves murders in Oxford. The only way that the narrator, an Oxford grad student, can solve the mysterious series of murders is through mathematics. He, and professor of logic, Arthur Seldom, use their knowledge of Wittgenstein’s Finite Rule Paradox to crack the murderer’ cryptic symbols and clues. It’s also pretty meta, not only being a murder mystery but also discussing murder mysteries as a genre – that, in itself, is pretty Oxford.   

 

6 ways to get involved in sport at Oxford

0

Whether you’re an incoming fresher determined to break into the Blues squads or a finalist determined that this year will be the one where you finally use those trainers that have been sitting in the back of your cupboard since your last P.E. lesson at school, getting into sport at university can seem a little intimidating. Luckily for you, Cherwell has put together a handy guide; here is how to enter Oxford’s sporting elite in 6 easy (if potentially a little tiring) steps…

1)      Do your research

If you already compete in a particular sport or know you would like to try a particular one, most clubs have websites or Facebook pages you can look at to find out more about them and contact existing members. Or you can use http://www.sport.ox.ac.uk to browse the many sports clubs so you can show off your knowledge at the Freshers’ Fair when you are the only person to know what Octopush is.

2)      Attend pre-season training

Anyone who is serious about participating in Blues sport should consider attending one of the pre-season training camps run by many of the clubs, including hockey and netball. These are a great way to meet the teams and show off your skills away from the chaos of trials during freshers’ week.

3)      Get your Freshers’ Fair tactics right

Most people do one of two things at the Freshers’ Fair: sign up for every single sports club in sight or run round the sports section faster than Roger Bannister at Iffley Road. Whichever of these approaches choose, you may regret it later on. Instead, you could actually talk to some of the people on the stands, and sign up for a few things that there is a genuine chance you might go to. Remember that these people don’t want to waste their time adding names to their mailing list for no reason, so if it sounds dull then move on to the next stand. After all, there are at least 10 more to get through just in the martial arts section.

4)      Turn up

Possibly the most daring of all these suggestions, particularly if you are a sporting rookie or a fresher who ignored number 3 and signed up for Korfball just so you didn’t have to listen to the entire rulebook being explained, but how about going along to something you signed up for and actually doing some sport? I know this is a bit radical but it might actually be fun and a great way to either bond with some existing friends by dragging them along as well or making some new ones. Many clubs run free taster sessions in the first few weeks of term so if you’re unsure then do have a go because you may discover an unknown talent for a new sport. If this sounds like too much effort, lots of clubs also hold informal drinks evenings, so you can go along and hang out with Oxford’s sporting elite even if you don’t want to train with them.

5)      Memberships

If you decide that sport is your thing then eventually you will have to pay some membership fees. These vary from club to club but if you are relatively talented and/or lucky your college may give you some funding for them. You may also want to become a member of the sports facilities at Iffley Road, which include a pool, athletics track and a gym and are where most sports clubs train. The membership fees for students are very reasonably priced if you opt for a 3 year membership and give you the chance to perfect your physique between lectures. You might even get lucky and attend a college where the JCR pays for membership…

6)      Don’t forget college sport

If, after a strenuous pre-season with the Blues squad, you think something a little more laid back might suit you, there is always plenty of rowing, rugby, football, netball, squash and more to be done at college level, with a good helping of social events on the side. And those who say college sport isn’t serious enough clearly didn’t attend some of the hotly contested Cuppers competitions of last year, which saw last-gasp victories, heartbreaking defeats and even a few broken bones.

As you can hopefully see, getting involved in sport at Oxford should not seem intimidating or particularly complicated, even if you aspire to do it at a high level. Most clubs and teams are happy to welcome novice and experienced athletes alike and you will soon be kitted out in your stash and feel part of Oxford’s proud sporting tradition. And even if you aren’t going to reach the glorified Blues standards, sport can still provide you with new friends, a way to escape from work, endless fun and hopefully a few successes along the way. Good luck, and see you at Iffley.

Women’s boxing: Knocking prejudice out for good

0

One year on, I’m still not sure what first possessed me to trek to Iffley for boxing. I think I might have joined OUABC to annoy my parents. Either that or the extreme disorientation of a history degree struck a loose nerve to create some kind of structure.

In the instance of the former, I certainly succeeded. My mother was resolutely horrified. Luckily for her my brother was on hold to offer some expert advice: ‘Oh leave her. She’s just escaped home and is dabbling with the whole rebellion thing. She never went through any of the angst-fuelled phases properly. The emo-fringe was only ever half-hearted. She grew it out when she started bumping into things more often than usual.’ Or words to that effect I am sure.

What was immediately apparent was my family’s dogmatic perception of the incompatibility of boxing with myself. ‘You’re just not, you know, built for that. There looked to be lots of nice dance societies in the prospectus. I know you’re not very good at that sort of thing but you might surprise yourself with proper training!’ Ugh. The bitter sting of familial disapproval. With this, I finally felt like a fully-fledged student ready to embrace socialism, Doc Martens and most ardently of all, the now ancestrally verboten boxing.

The fact my family were surprised is, of course, unsurprising. Women’s boxing is not a hobby often slipped into idle conversation. Nor should it be expected to be so. Women’s right to professionally fight was the result of lengthy battle.

Interestingly, the incompatibility of femininity and boxing was institutionalised later in human history than might be expected. In terms of bare-knuckle ‘fisticuffs’, women have been ‘boxing’ for just as long as men. In the 18th century, men and women even shared the same arena; the Bear-Garden. However, what was different was the content of the ensuing match reports. Rather than commenting on any technical skill or physical prowess, as was custom in the reports from the men’s matches, it was the fact that the women were so scantily clad that put pen to paper. Reports of female boxing thus became little more than romantically adroit erotica.

The explicit exclusion of women actually arrived with the reforms made to boxing that transformed bare-knuckle prize-fighting into the sport we recognise today. In order to maximise appeal to the upper classes, the presence of women and backdrop of gambling were replaced by the introduction of the large, padded, and now emblematic, gloves. From then onwards, women were automatically associated with the plebeian and paltry character of illegal prize-fighting.

Today, female boxing seems still to be masked by the outmoded head guard of sexual voyeurism. The origins of this may well lie in 18th century match reports but fault now rests with popular culture. Whilst the feisty-feminist look of the early 2000s may be felt to be empowering, Christina Aguilera’s pre-Miley Cyrus twerking in a boxing ring does nothing to rescue female fighters from associations of farcicaland sexual spectacle.

This aside, the fundamental problem is that women in boxing have alwaysfallen foul of a double jab from social expectations. The first punch is the belief that it isunnatural for women to hit, and the second, that it is equally unnatural for women to be hit. Written in 1840, Thomas Ingoldby’s poem epitomises the first blow:

Within a well-roped ring, or on stage,

Boxing may be a very pretty Fancy,

When Messrs. Burke or Bendigo engage;

– ‘Tis not so well in Susan, Jane, or Nancy:

To get well mill’d by any one’s an evil,

But by a lady – ‘tis the very devil.

A century and a half later, Amir Khan, without the furnishings of a Venus and Adonis stanza, delivered the second, “Deep down I think women shouldn’t fight …When you get hit it can be very painful. Women can get knocked out.”

Since 2004, Khan has changed his mind. Recently, women’s boxing has come the furthest in the shortest space of time. It was over a century ago when women’s boxing was first showcased at the Olympics in a demonstration bout in 1904, yet it was not seen again till London 2012.

Here in Oxford, we’ve reached the title fight too. By that I mean more than just Varsity. Although, now that elephant’s entered the arena, it is worth mentioning that three of the club’s female boxers fought this year. This included an inter-club bout because Cambridge had no girls to compete. Regardless, it must be stressed that OUABC is not all about Varsity. It’s about boxing and this comprises two components; training and sparring. The endgame of being a member is to be just that, a part of the boxing club. In the words of women’s captain Lucy Harris, “You aren’t really mates till you’ve punched each other in the face repeatedly.” At the same time, sparring occupies just one corner of the ring. Girls are welcome who have no interest in actually fighting, but just want to get fit. There’s a lot of solidarity to be shared in the physical grilling of training.

The women’s club is not an isolated sorority. Its raison d’être is to honour that the decision to fight is a right to have and a choice to be made. In just 2000, this decision was referred by a Daily Mail columnist as the result of “the raging politically correct lobbies who determine in this deranged nation that women must have the same right as men to be struck in the head and the chest.” Injected with an antidote for prejudice, this opinion translates to the cause well. Why is it acceptable for men to choose to hit each other in a professionalised arena, yet unacceptable for women? Opponents of female boxing should only make their case grounded on objections to boxing as a whole. The point is that it is the individual’s choice whether they don gloves, not the expectations of society.

Now it’s 2014 and we are in the position to pack a real punch. Instead of pandering to the conventional tropes of femininity and whining about the male domination of sport, why don’t we invite it to the blue corner and lace up our red gloves? Boxing is not about pointing the finger at others: it’s an individual sport. If something goes wrong in that ring, it’s your own fault. This attitude must be passed over the ropes. The fight outside has lasted long enough, it’s time to get in the ring.

 

A guide to Oxford’s fashion stereotypes

0

We all know that the typical Oxford stereotype – the dweeb with glasses who spends his time in the library engrossed in X number of books and looking so pale you wonder when (or even if) he ever saw sunlight – is by no means a reality. It’s now accepted (at least nearly) that, yes, Oxford students like to work hard, but HELL do we like to play hard too.

There’s no denying the constant speculation over what the ‘Oxford stereotype’ constitutes in a social context but what about within a fashion context? What ‘types’ of style do Oxford students have?

Fashion is by its very nature a diverse realm, a way for individuals to ‘fit in’ (e.g. following a trend), ‘stand out’ (e.g. dressing in a way that’s particularly unusual) or, as is the case for most of us, somewhere in between the two. Within the world of fashion, there’s no denying the fact that there are particular ‘ways’ people choose to dress and style themselves. The tomboy/indie/preppy look (think Alexa Chung) is just one example.

And just as there is no ‘one’ Oxford stereotype in the social sense (‘the blues aspirer’, ‘the union hack’ or ‘the library swot’ might be a few), there’s certainly no ‘one’ stereotype for the way Oxford students dress.

Although by no means an exclusive list, the following covers the most popular ways Oxford students dress themselves. Take a walk down Cornmarket and see how many you can spot… The question is, which one are you?

1.     THE BRAND SLAVE

You know him – jacket from Fred Polo, shirt from Ralph Lauren and stripy socks from Harrods, this guy settles only for the finest, and boy does he make it known.

2.     COMFORT COOL

We’re at Uni, not a fashion show. The comfort cool doesn’t give a heck what you think and will happily rock up in the library, tutes or lectures kitted in trackies and a hoodie that says ‘fashion? Sorry what?’

3.     LITTLE MISS ACCESSORISE

It’s all in the accessories baby. She’s the go to queen for bags, shoes and all things sparkly. Number of proms attended? Rapidly losing count.

4.     THE ‘I HAVEN’T MADE ANY EFFORT’ BUT I SO HAVE

A slick white shirt, blazer and chinos, totally effortless right? Little did you know he spent ten minutes ironing that shirt and changed his cuff links especially for dinner.

 5.     THE FASHIONISTA

Always ahead of the game, this person knew the latest catwalk trend before it even became a trend. Walking tall with just the slightest expression of smug, there’s no ignoring the effort the fashion conscious guru goes to.

6.     THE GEEK CHIC

Big glasses, braces and a shirt buttoned to the top, the geek chic looks like they’ve just stepped out of a glossy Specsavers ad.

7.     THE “MY MUM BOUGHT MY WHOLE WARDROBE”

Still wearing the shirt his mum bought him in year 10, this guy is happy to wear the same thing every day – the only variation being his Marks and Spencer’s boxers.

8.     THE SPORTS JUNKIE

Gym member? Check. Blues aspirer? Double Check. Kitted in Nike, Adidas and Puma, the sports junkie works out hard, making sure they have all the gear to match.

9.     THE “EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE”

Usually in jeans and a standard top, this person will make a spontaneous effort when least expected. For one day only, let the compliments roll.

10.  THE WHAT ARE YOU WEARING?!

They think they look great. The rest of the world thinks they need to invest in a mirror. When it comes to clothing, this person needs to head to the ‘common sense’ department ASAP.

What can we learn from the Commonwealth Games?

0

The 20th Commonwealth Games in Glasgow commenced on the 23rd of July and drew to a close on the 3rd of August. In those ten days alone, an ample sample of athletics has reached us – enough for us to make some verdicts.

Withdrawals

We could in fact, have even made some conclusions before the Games began. The organisers of the Glasgow Games were hit by withdrawals of one big name after another in the lead-up. Mo Farah, who had been due to make an appearance two weeks earlier in the Glasgow Diamond League, was once more forced to pull out, having failed to recover from an abdominal illness. The joint-second fastest man ever, Jamaican Yohan Blake, was also ruled out of the Games owing to a serious hamstring injury he picked up in Glasgow’s Hampden Park during the Diamond League. Another big name, Katarina Johnson-Thompson, Britain’s rising heptathlon star, announced her withdrawal a few days before the opening ceremony, as a result of a prevailing foot injury.

In addition to this news came the revelations that Jamaican track stars Usain Bolt and Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce, both multiple Olympic champions, would only run in the 4x100m relays, opting not to run the individual events. It seemed that the Commonwealth Games was going to be a rather quiet affair.

Not so. The Games were filled with plenty of drama in the athletics department once they had begun.

Success Stories and Dramas

Adam Gemili got the ball rolling by winning England’s first medal in athletics. The 20-year-old shone on the track, coming in second only to Jamaican Kemar Bailey-Cole, who trains with Usain Bolt. The university student was put under the spotlight after winning the World Junior Championships in 2012 at just eighteen, in a time much faster than any Brits had managed for quite some time – 10.05 seconds. The youngster’s feat has prompted many zealous athletics fans, hungry for British athletics success in the 100m, to count down the moments until the sprint sensation runs under the big 10 seconds. Gemili’s not worried: “It’s not about times, it’s about position. The times will eventually come. This is just a stepping-stone for the European Championships and then the Olympics in Rio.”

Adam Gemili is one to watch. This is his first senior medal, and the athlete is steadily improving. With a 19.98 time in the 200m to his name (run last year), he is most definitely capable of breaking the 10-second barrier.  Patience on the part of spectators, however, not pressure, is required. (Ed: Having since won a European gold medal, Gemili is already proving us right…)

Nigeria’s Blessing Okagbare dominated on the track, scooping up the sprint double in the 100m and 200m in Fraser-Pryce’s absence. The athlete, who stands tall at 5ft 11 inches, and is also a skilled long jumper, triumphed in the 100m in a time of 10.85, setting a new Commonwealth Games record and equalling the world leading time. Three days later, the 25-year-old again stormed to victory, winning the 200m in 22.25 seconds, ahead of young English duo Jodie Williams and Bianca Williams.  The two Brits (no relation) showed incredible determination, smashing their personal bests to come into to silver and bronze positions in 22.50 and 22.58 respectively.

There was joy and disbelief also for Jazmin Sawyers, the multi-talented 20-year-old who already has a silver medal in her collection after bobsleigh success in the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics. The Bristol University law student began her athletics career as a heptathlete, before choosing to specialise in the long jump. It was for this event that Sawyers earned silver in the Commonwealth Games. Jazmin is also an aspiring songstress, fitting composing and performing songs for gigs into her hectic schedule.

Yet sadly, whilst three English athletes celebrated medals last Thursday, there was heartbreak for another. Shara Proctor, the former British long jump record holder, withdrew from the final, tearful and wracked with pain from a hamstring injury.

The conditions in Hampden Park cannot have helped. The stadium was very often pelted with heavy showers, and the temperature was cold enough for a considerable number of athletes to complain about the weather during their post-race interviews. Many competed with their leggings still on to prevent injuries.

England’s Greg Rutherford showed those that had dared to call him a one-hit wonder by winning long jump gold with a distance of 8.20m. The Olympic champion has just this season set a new British record (8.51m).

There was more home nation victory from the ‘Weirwolf’, with the 35-year-old six-time Paralympic champion David Weir winning gold in the T54 1500m. Visually impaired Libby Clegg brought home Scotland’s first athletics gold in the T12 100m, helping the host nation beat its Commonwealth gold medal record. Eilidh Child, dubbed the ‘poster girl’ of the Games, added to the medal tally with a silver medal in the 400m hurdles. Jo Pavey, forty years old and only 10 months after the birth of a baby daughter, stormed to 5,000 bronze.

The Commonwealth Games, the one major athletics competition in which the nations of the United Kingdom are split rather than united, brought a unique kind of drama to the stage. In the 800m heats, England’s Andrew Osagie and Welshman Joe Thomas found themselves in a scuffle at the finish line. Osagie at first appeared to have blocked the Welshman, but after replays, it seemed there was another possibility: that Thomas had gotten himself into a difficult spot and to qualify, had to push himself out with all his might. The result was that he knocked into fellow Brit Osagie, who then fell to the ground. The verdict of the messy mishap was that Osagie was disqualified and Joe Thomas was put through to the final. One can only hope that this unlucky incident doesn’t create a rift between the two Britons in the future.

There was more drama for the home nations with former 400m hurdles World Champion and defending Commonwealth champion Dai Greene displaying a disappointing performance in Glasgow, finishing in a time two seconds outside of his personal best. The Welshman has been beset by one injury after another and admitted that four months previously, he had not even believed it possible that he would be competing in Glasgow.

Kenya’s David Rudisha, 800m world record holder, was at the centre of still more Commonwealth commotion as he was out-sprinted in the final stages of the 800m final by Botswana’s Nijel Amos.

Drug cheating

Wales and Botswana were embroiled in a different kind of drama when it was revealed that Welshmen Gareth Warburton and Rhys Williams had failed drug tests and 400m Botswanan track star Amantle Montsho tested positive for banned stimulant methylhexaneamine after finishing fourth in the final.

Relays

The relays, as always, provided a positive finish to the athletics of the Games. Jamaican track stars Usain Bolt and Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce finally made their long-awaited appearances, with the world record holder in the 100m, 200m and 4x100m welcomed fondly by the crowd at Hampden Park in spite of the furore that had ensued earlier in the week owing to claims in the media that Bolt had made disparaging comments about the 20th Commonwealth Games. The Jamaican men and women’s teams powered to gold in all but one of the relay races – winning not only the 4x100m relays but also the women’s 4x400m, although they failed to medal in the men’s event. England produced performances good enough to get onto the podium after each of the relays, with perhaps the most electrifying coming from Matthew Hudson-Smith, who ran a confident anchor leg to win England an unexpected gold. The 19-year-old from Wolverhampton, who only made the 400m his key event this year, held off experienced Bahamian Chris Brown in a torrential downpour, obliterating three seconds of his personal best based on the time he ran for his split.

The team of Adam Gemili, Harry Aikines-Aryeetey, Richard Kilty and Danny Talbot earned England a well-deserved silver medal in the 4x100m, while Asha Philip, Bianca Williams, Jodie Williams and Ashleigh Nelson ran strongly after Jamaica and Nigeria to get England the bronze in the women’s 4x100m. The women’s 4x400m relay saw Christine Ohuorogu, Shana Cox, Kelly Massey and Anyika Onuora also claim a bronze for England, after the Jamaicans and Nigerians.

The Commonwealth Games in Glasgow were certainly well received. Despite some memorable names being absent, and the recurrence of drug cheating, the Games have drawn enough respect to be declared “the standout Games in the history of the movement” by Commonwealth Games Federation chief executive Mike Hooper.

Conclusions in a nutshell

The Commonwealth Games is a magnificent opportunity for young athletes to flourish on the world stage

– Glasgow 2014 has done nothing to stop other countries from thinking of Britain as having the worst weather on the planet.

– British athletics is in a good place leading up to the European Championships and Rio 2016. The success of our athletes in the individual sprints and sprint relays is evidence that we will soon be able to really threaten other nations.

– Doping is still rife in athletics.

– Some big names could be out for quite some time owing to injuries they have sustained either just before or during the Games.

It’s back already: A Premiership football preview

0

After a difficult few months, this weekend finally sees the return of the Barclays Premier League. It’s been a long summer of transfer rumours and preseason tours, with a charming little international football tournament thrown in for good measure. What lies in store for us, then, over the next nine months?

In many ways, this season looks to be quite similar to every other – some things never change. For one, Arsenal fans, as always, are quite convinced their team is going to win the league. There are, however, changes afoot – for example, this season, there is some small chance that Arsenal might actually win the league.

The Gunners have added star quality to their squad with the purchase of Alexis Sanchez, the Chilean winger formerly of Barcelona. If nothing else, Sanchez brings self-confidence to the Arsenal dressing room – when his schoolteacher told each pupil in the class to bring in a picture of their hero for ‘show-and-tell’, young Alexis brought in a picture of himself. This guy makes Ronaldo look like a quivering nervous wreck.

Arsenal, however, face stiff competition at the top. With Diego Costa, Chelsea look to have finally filled the Drogba-shaped hole at the spearhead of their attack (Drogba himself has, incidentally, returned), while Filipe Luis and Cesc ‘I’ll never sign for another English team’ Fabregas will certainly improve the West London outfit, the latter bringing the added benefit of making Arsenal fans cry. Manchester City, last season’s champions, have invested less – but then again, what need is there to invest when you already have the best squad in the league by some distance? The only obvious weakness in the City line up – a centre back to partner the redoubtable Vincent Kompany, who recently signed a new deal with the ‘noisy neighbours’ – may well have been addressed with the signing of Eliaquim Mangala from Porto.

Across the city, ike a phoenix rising from the ashes of the Moyes era, Manchester United seem to be enjoying a renaissance under Louis van Gaal, having won every single game of their preseason. Indeed, they have already ‘done the double’, adding the prestigious Chevrolet Cup to the overflowing Old Trafford trophy cabinet, and being crowned Champions of the World following a dramatic 3-1 victory over Liverpool in Miami. Ander Herrera looks to be the love child of Paul Scholes and Roy Keane, while Luke Shaw could well prove an invaluable investment. United, then, must surely be regarded as title challengers.

The same, perhaps, cannot be said of old rivals Liverpool, who have replaced Luis Suarez with Rickie Lambert.

The title race, then, should – in a dramatic deviation from Premier League norms – prove tightly contested and bitterly fought. What makes this season particularly exciting, however, is the stellar cast waiting to act out this drama. Familiar faces remain from last season – Mourinho is sure to draw controversy, whilst Arsenal’s resurgence will surely see the return of ‘snarky Arsene’, replacing the genuinely upsetting ‘sad Arsene’ we have been forced to endure in recent seasons.

New characters, however, seem to guarantee a little extra spice. Louis Van Gaal is a man who takes no prisoners, whilst lower down the pecking order at QPR – reports suggest there are in fact more than five teams in the league – the return of ‘Arry Redknapp is sure to add a dash of colour to the inevitable relegation scrap. Redknapp, it seems, is refusing to emerge from 2002, as he reportedly seeks to add any of Samuel Eto’o, Esteban Cambiasso and Ronaldinho to the blockbuster signing of promising young centre-back Rio Ferdinand. Someone, please, please steer him clear of Kleberson.

As you can probably tell, I, like many football fans, am going a little crazy. Kick off cannot come soon enough.

Review: The Giver

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

After eighteen years, actor/producer Jeff Bridges has finally accomplished what he set out to do to do: transform Lois Lowry’s beloved novel, The Giver, into a feature film.

To this day I recall sitting at my sixth grade desk, discovering aloud the significance of dystopian collectives, authoritarianism and euthanasia, since elders in the English department wisely championed Lois Lowry’s 1994 Newbery-winner as required reading. Predominantly faithful to its source, the film follows a teenage Jonas (Brenton Thwaites) tasked with the burden of becoming the Receiver of Memory under the tutelage of the shadowy Giver (Jeff Bridges) in a contained, superficially utopian community. Though held together by a talented ensemble cast, tenuously arranged emotional beats and overtly constructed scenes result in an adaptation that meanders in the elsewhere between mediocrity and evocative drama. 

In his commune devoid of hatred, villainy and Tinder, Jonas must acquire and retain banished memories in the event the elders (led by Meryl Streep) might one day require his counsel. His training exposes him to unbeknownst qualities like color, and concepts like eros and family (fortunately, not at the same time). His ignorance compromised and his heart aching with passion, he concludes that this is no utopia; rather, it’s a calculated sociological experiment suppressing humanity’s most visceral elements—the good with the bad. Jonas alone begins to understand that he was assigned parents who enjoy him yet do not love him, for they know not how; since love, in any manifestation, holds no existence due to its inextricable association with pain. And there will be none of that.

The novel’s introspective prose makes for a daunting theatrical adaptation, as evidenced by the films desperate reliance on voiceover in hopes that Lowry’s literary touch might permeate the new medium. And though the filmmakers certainly capture the essence of the story, much of the dialogue seems constricted. Director Phillip Noyce extracts many of the novels intricacies in favor of preserving a Hunger Gamesian rhythm, which, in print is appropriately reserved only for the novels climactic ascension. Often we are whisked out of emotional investment in a beautifully performed and visually spectacular scene in a roaring wave of superfluous tempo, subjected to the irregular cadence of an impatient directorial ebb and flow. It is this, more so than its negotiated dialogue, which inhibits The Giver.

My own memory failing me, I cannot recall with any measure of certainty whether the novel featured aerial drones so ubiquitously. The movie’s visual design in such respect is surprisingly topical and still hauntingly dystopian, showcasing all the traditional conventions of the genre: a drained color scheme capturing soulless monoliths encircled by dismal atmospheric considerations. Performances by Jeff Bridges and Meryl Streep—not so surprisingly—command attention and exude the rare, unannounced confidence of master artisans. Brendon Thwaites plays a convincing Jonas (although he is considerably older than his literary counterpart) and a brunette Taylor Swift appears out of thin air just in time to say hello, though she does so with aplomb.        

The ingredients are undeniably there. In rare instances I found myself absorbed. Lost in something resembling foregone childhood awe for lessons unfolding before me. The Giver reminds us, in the face of incalculable societal problems, that good exists in this world. This was the film talking.

Or maybe it was only an echo.

 

Up shit creek with too many paddles

0

When you live in a family that has never understood the concept of ‘relax’, holidays tend to fall in the category of ‘adventurous’. Brought up on a diet of tents, wildernesses, mountains and lots of laughing, it appears my siblings and I were nostalgic for the less refined holidays of our childhood. Discarding the pattern of the last few summers (where sun and pools FINALLY reigned), we were returned once more to the great outdoors. 

Still heading south, in the hope of sun, we spent two weeks down in the South of France, in the relatively untouched region of the Ardeche. A river region that runs south between the Cevennes National Parl and the more tourist-dominated Provence, the Ardeche is characterised by dramatic gorges, beautiful rivers and big ‘ol green mountains. 

The madness of my own family spreads to our extended family too, and in typical fashion, the large 60th birthday we were attending would involve a two-day kayak down the Gorges de l’Ardèche. In trepidation we set off, having been given one of the briefest set of instructions I’ve ever had. Rapids were apparently too easy to need explaining, and the idea seemed to be to take them with a pinch of joie de vivre. Being in the same kayak as your brother results in being repeatedly overturned, very untrusting but also laughing most of the way. White water is not as nerve-racking as anticipated, as long as one of the pair is strong enough to steer, and by the end we were choosing riskier routes, which made for more fun, except when your fellow paddler thinks he’s good enough to fit through the rocky outcrops, and ends up getting you wedged.

Despite our family group ranging from 5 years to 60, everyone loved it. Uncles became childishly reckless and the younger cousins desperately tried to keep up with their older counterparts. Everyone’s highlight was a particularly competitive member explaining to everyone that the next set of rapids was known for its ability to overturn kayaks so we should all follow him. He promptly disappeared beneath the water. He did re-emerge, and unscathed, but definitely not allowed to forget it.  

As you move down the river, through 54m high natural arches (pont d’arc), beaches and huge natural diving platforms, you can’t help but feel tiny and realise that there is no other way than this to see the gorges in all their beauty. 

The whole region is defined by its untouched nature, and for the whole two weeks, we only spotted about 7 other British cars. It’s too far from transport links to have been populated by the tourists, and that’s where it’s charm lies. 

For the next week and a half, the region provided enough to keep everyone busy. The local food, shops and mountain-side towns kept me and my camera occupied, and my sister in constant supply of ice cream. The crazier half that had decided cycling up Mont Ventoux was a good idea returned later that day, exhausted but at the same time forever proud. The hectic atmosphere soon wound down, and by the end we were back in a house, reading, swimming and cycling. However, it helped that when you walked out onto the balcony, you looked out from the top of the mountains over three beautiful valleys.

Interested in writing a travel blog of your own? Email [email protected].