Tuesday 10th June 2025
Blog Page 1340

NUS Referendum declared void

0

A Junior Tribunal convened on Monday afternoon has found the result of the NUS referendum conducted last week to be void, following the revelation over the weekend of evidence of grave electoral malpractice. 

The announcement follows the resignation last night of OUSU’s returning Officer Alex Walker and a complaint issued by Jack J Matthews, leader of the ‘No’ campaign, highlighting the misuse of the Unique Voter Codes (UVCs) issued for the online voting system mi-vote.com.

Cherwell understands that thousands of “spare” voter codes were issued for the election process, and whilst the Returning Officer only issued 20 of these for legitimate purposes, over 1,100 are thought to have been used to vote in the referendum. The codes are thought to have been used in close clusters and from a single locaton. 

The Junior Tribunal concluded, “we understand from Ms Falck [acting returning officer] that about 20 replacement codes were issued during the course of the election, the number of spare codes used to vote far exceeds this. This means that votes were cast using a significant number of codes which were never distributed to voters. On this basis alone the referendum result cannot stand”.

Whilst the result of the referendum has been anulled, the Junior Tribunal found that “we are unable ro recommend any changes to OUSU’s practises or governance”. 

The Tribunal was chaired by former OUSU committee members Madeline Stanley, Lewis Iwu, Rich Hardiman and was attended by the current Chair of Council Nick Cooper.

It is understood that a decision on whether to reconvene a referendum will take place at OUSU Council on Wednesday.

‘No’ campaign leader Jack J Matthews told Cherwell, “I welcome the result of the Junior Tribunal – it is absolutely right that the entire Referendum has been voided. We must now wait for a response from other investigations which will seek to discover who perpetrated this crime.”

Matthews continued, “In the meantime, I would urge people to ask the questions that need to be asked for the future of OUSU, and not the ones that satisfy curiosity. I particularly look to those on OUSU Council, to find the courage to query and challenge our current practices, and also to set the tone for how this situation will be remediedIt is not for old codgers like me to decide whether we should have another referendum – it is for Council”.

OUSU President-elect Louis Trup remarked, “I am genuinely shocked to hear of the electoral malpractice that has led to the results of the NUS referendum being declared void. It’s obviously a terrible thing to happen, but I just can’t really believe anybody cared enough to go to the trouble of sending off so many votes.”

Current OUSU President and ‘Yes’ campaign leader Tom Rutland has since tweeted his intention to bring forward a motion for OUSU to re-affiliate with the NUS.

However, commenting on the ‘Yes’ campaign’s claim to victory, Jack J Matthews remarked, “While recognising that students did indeed vote to remain affiliated to NUS, it is hard to see how anyone can claim victory when democracy has been so brazenly violated”.

Speaking with regards to the 7th Week motion Louis Trup said, “I hope that motion passes, as the real results of the referendum would have been to re-affiliate. However, by voiding the referendum, it is as though it didn’t happen, so I will push to have an in/out referendum next academic year. Yay.”

Trup continued, “Although the Junior Tribunal could not offer any advice on ways to prevent a similar kerfuffle again, over the summer, the new sabbatical team will look into ways to improve OUSU’s systems.

“In the meantime, once I take up my position at the helm of the OUSU ship, I will push for the changes in the NUS which were highlighted over the campaigning period. There has been an indication that around 30% of Oxford students are not happy with the NUS, and that is 30% too many.”

Student campaigner Nathan Akehurst told Cherwell, “All those interested in democracy should condemn ballot-stuffing and admire the diligence and principle of Jack Matthews in his investigation. It seems apparent that Oxford did decisively choose to reaffiliate. However, the conversation about OUSU, NUS, democracy and representation should not stop here”.

Likewise, Louis Trup observed, “In all of this, Jack Matthews has shown himself to be a truly honourable person. I think the students of Oxford owe a lot to his honesty and top-notch conduct.”

Interview: Devaki Jain

0

In the front room of an on-site apartment in St Anne’s College, one of the world’s most famous feminist economists is offering me biscuits and tea. Now an 81 year old Oxford alumna, in 1975, Devaki Jain, published Indian Women, a book that would permanently change the way women in the developing world are treated and considered, from historical, social and economic perspectives.

It would be taken to Mexico for the UN’s first World Conference on Women in 1975 to represent the status of women in India. Indian Women was the first of a plethora of academic books and work with the UNDP for Jain’s career as a feminist economist; a career that would help her receive the Padma Bhusan, India’s third highest civilian award, in 2006, for her contributions to female empowerment.

Forty years later, she’s returned to St Anne’s as a visiting alumna. A lot has changed since 1959 when she came here to read PPE. “When I was in Oxford there was never anything about feminism. I don’t know if I was not aware of it or if it wasn’t there.” It was Indian Women that helped her realise there was a problem. “I came into understanding there was an issue about women’s subordination very late. When the publisher first approached me asking if I would like to write or edit a volume on the status of women in India, I said I didn’t have a clue about the subject, but I said I would compile some essays.

When I tried to put together the book, I didn’t know feminists or people from the women’s movement, but I chose academics because, as a lecturer in Economics at Delhi University, I was in an academic space. I met sociologists, educationalists, historians, and we wrote a fantastic book together. I got involved in learning more about women and I focussed on the lives of women in poverty zones. That was like a burst of knowledge. I found that women, even amongst the poorest of the poor, landless, houseless, were struggling to bring a livelihood to their family, much more than their menfolk.

“I went to America on two occasions, and met Gloria Steinem at both points. She came to India as a scholar in 1958 when I was teaching, and so we had a lot of fun. We were both unmarried, young girls, and neither of us identified as feminists. When I returned, she had established Ms Magazine and I had written Indian Women. She explained so many things to me about how women collectively empower themselves by affirming some kind of a ideology of themselves. When I came back and told people in India that I was a feminist, they all said ‘Feminism is a bra burning, crazy American thing, and we don’t like it.’ It’s very un-Indian.”

Jain applied her knowledge of statistics to her knowledge of women’s issues, and noticed that, “in statistics, you define a worker as main, subsidiary, supplementary etc. Women are usually categorised as a supplementary. But I was able to argue nationally that amongst the poor, women are the main breadwinners as they are willing to do anything; sweeping, cleaning, selling scraps, anything to put food on the table. Then I realised that I had to visualise what women are as economic agents. I had to just concentrate on the economic aspect of the women’s life. Now for the last forty years that has been my song. Each time you can bring out something more.”

It says a lot about feminism that even Jain finds it difficult to define it. “If I say it’s an identity of woman, then I am excluding the transgendered people. But maybe I should say that it’s affirming who I am, but with a special affirmation of an identity which is somehow related to women. I haven’t yet figured it out. It’s kind of a philosophy of freedom and affirmation of self, of rights. The freedom to be what you want to be. But it has to have a political edge.

“Not party politics, but a presence in political space. There are so many different dimensions which I haven’t sorted out. I often say that women’s experience of life, and their capability to do a million things, needs to be celebrated and shown off so that we are not always shown to be people who only do housework and childcare. But the young Indian women know who they are. They say ‘we are feminists’, and they celebrate their identity, and they’re inclusive of men, but they are a solid form now.”

The modern feminist movement in India is moving at a fast pace. In the face of discrimination and patriarchy, their voice has been loud and defiant, especially in light of 2012’s Delhi gang rape case.

“Unfortunately, or fortunately as the case may be, when we were doing the protest marches and so on in Delhi, women in the interior of India wrote to us saying that we were making a big thing of this because there is media in Delhi, but that they experienced these things everyday; women being brutalised by drunken men, girls being raped and thrown into the well.

“They’re common, these kinds of attacks. But we began to feel that it was good it got sensationalised, because as a result of that, so much else happened which has been very healing for us; the law, the police, a huge change in the attitude. That I think is the first step, but it doesn’t deal with caste related brutal rape, or rape in traditional families where the hierarchy of male female is extraordinary.”

I ask what Jain admires about the new young feminists in India, and why their recent campaigns against sexual violence have been so powerful. “They have a great ability to work together, across the country of India, despite differences in class, caste, religion, language, location and preoccupation. They enable each other. If one is writing but can’t speak English, the other can do it quickly for her. They are also independent. There may be Marxists among them but they do not support the Marxist party. But they support every kind of rebellion. So there is a radical edge. There is a lot of energy.”

Contemporary Indian feminists face a great deal of questioning as to whether their movement is exclusionary of the illiterate masses, and reserved for the privileged, educated middle classes and students. “This new feminism is all social media. Social media which requires Indian languages or English would be unavailable to the masses in poverty. But the majority of these feminists are activists. They are working with the deprived sections of women. They are organising their rights, water, credit, or just creating awareness. So they are not alienated from the masses, but the masses do have less space in this communication. The anti-feminist, conservative male world, which includes the conservative female world, will call us all elites. They try to kill us. It’s a very good way of turning the tables against you.”

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%9804%%[/mm-hide-text]

It’s not a criticism that’s foreign to Anglo-American feminism. The question of exclusion and intersectionality, particularly in relation to questions of race, are becoming discussed with increasing velocity. I ask Jain for her view on whether different backgrounds, national and ethnic, make a difference to feminist concerns. “I stayed with Alice Walker last year. She is someone who admires me, and I her.” In an interview with Rudolph Byrd, Walker once said, “I have no problem being called “feminist” or “womanist.” In coining the term, I was simply trying myself to see more clearly what sets women of color apart in the rainbow that is a world movement of women who’ve had enough of being second- and third-class citizens of the earth.” Jain picks up on this point, saying that, “‘Womanism’ is very popular in Africa. They want men to be included, not in the sense that they can also be feminists, but in that feminism is too militant and excluding of men. There is a universality and a particularity about feminism. The political spaces and economic and social spaces are different, so I think sometimes it will be difficult to do a universalisation. But I have been writing a great deal about what something called indigenous feminism, that is different to universal feminism. I challenge all that now that I have grown. You don’t need to have feminists of different types.”

Jain ends by telling me that feminism is now more vital than ever before. “The fact that there is a whole generation of people like you, who have identified yourselves with feminism, which has meant self strengthening and participation, is a fire that I would like to grow bigger. Feminism has a moral edge. It fights for justice for all, for men and for women. I find that we are full of fire. So now, not only because there is an economic crisis, but because there is a lot of disturbance and divisions in our countries, feminism can be like a torch that recalls what human beings really want: A just world, and an inclusive world. We fight for that.”

Correction: This article has been amended to reflect that Alice Walker was misquoted by Devaki Jain.

 

Union President writes open letter to speakers

0

Union President Ben Sullivan has sent an open letter to this term’s speakers encouraging them to appear at their agreed events. 

In the letter addressed to General Petreaus and Paloma Faith amongst others, Sullivan said, “The Union was founded on the principles of free speech and debate. This core belief in the opportunity for everyone to put forward their point of view still represents the ultimate purpose of the institution. This overarching principle remains more important than any individual speaker, any debate, and any President.” 

Sullivan pointed out, “Acting upon legal advice, I am not yet able to give my side of the story. As such I currently do not even have the ability to defend myself from these allegations which I deny”

He continued, “Under British law, a person is innocent until proven guilty. This principle governs British society and for the President of the Union to subvert it would be to act against everything the institution stands for. If there is one place where an allegation must be treated as just an allegation, then it is in this Society.”

In reference to this Thursday’s no-confidence motion, which was proposed by over 30 Union members and will be debated in front of the House, Sullivan said, “I feel the calls for my resignation are premature”. However, he did state, “Should the situation change I will of course review my position” 

The letter comes after an open letter from OUSU Vice President for Women Sarah Pine and Helena Dollimore, which called on this term’s speakers to consider withdraw from planned Union events. Human rights activist and nobel Prize-winner Tawakkol Karman subsequently announced on Channel 4 that she was pulling out of the Union’s term card.

In turn, A.C. Grayling wrote an open letter to Pine defending his decision to speak on 22nd May, stating “I simply cannot, in all conscience, allow myself to act only on the basis of allegations and suspicions, or of conviction by the kangaroo court of opinion, or trial by the press.” 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%9802%%[/mm-hide-text] 

OUSU Returning Officer resigns over NUS controversy

0

The Returning Officer of OUSU has resigned after “serious irregularities” were revealed to have taken place in the recent NUS referendum. 

Alexander Walker, a second year chemist at Wadham, posted his resignation on the board at the union last night.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%9801%%[/mm-hide-text]

In the letter he states, “I have been the returning officer of OUSU since January and I believe that I have contributed by working with the sabbatical officers and by organising the RAG ballot and other council elections.

“However, in light of the recent events concerning the NUS referendum, I have come to the decision that my position is no longer tenable. The grave situation with the NUS referendum happened under my watch. Although we do not currently understand how this happened, I do not believe that I should continue in this position as with my academic pressures as a second year chemist, I am unable to fulfil my duties. 

He continues, “I understand that many people have had a great deal invested in this referndum and I feel for them in this turbulent time. I wish the Junior Tribunal the best of luck in finding out how this happened and I am happy to continue to contribute to the investigation.” 

The investigation follows a formal complaint put forward by Jack Matthews, leader of the ‘Believe in Oxford’ campaign following irregularities with the voting process. The official result of the referendum was announced at the King Arms pub at 7.30 on Wednesday with a 1780 to 1652 vote to disaffiliate from the NUS for the academic year 2014-2015 announced. However, there were a large number of ‘No’ votes which appeared to have been cast at the same time, from the same location. Cherwell understands that a large number of Unique Voter Codes (UVCs) were used in the last hour of the election process in order to give the ‘No’ vote a wide margin of victory. This has raised major concerns with the validity of the referendum and a Junior Tribunal is meeting today to investigate the issue.

OUSU President and leader of the YES campaign, Tom Rutland, told Cherwell, “A Junior Tribunal is meeting today to consider the complaint issued regarding the voting irregularities in the referendum.”

Country Diary: Shotover

0

We cross South Park when it is already getting dark. It’s been raining for the past two days, but tonight the view is clear and stars are beginning to pockmark the sky, presided by a lamp of a moon.

The grass is still wet, soggy, puddled; if you stand quietly enough, you can hear the water trickling downhill in a series of miniature channels over which our boots slip and sludge clumsily.

At the top of the park we sit beneath a Sycamore overlooking the city. Only a few spires remain illuminated now, shedding light on weathered rock, alone; exposed.

Soon we’re off again, walking along dimly illuminated streets, passing the dilapidated Thistle and Crown. We cross the ring-road and soon the real climb begins. The road loses its pavement and the banks become steeper and lined with tall trees. Eventually the walker is exposed to a long, open ridge.

Few students make the trek out to Shotover, and those who do make it all the way out of town usually do so by means other than their own feet. And
yet, there’s something more fulfilling about leaving one’s doorstep, crossing the blurred boundary out of town and into a silent environment, before
returning by one’s own feet.

Shotover is one of Oxford’s truly liminal spaces – open, forested, liberating,
naked – yet still clearly undetached from the biref glimpses of Botley’s gridded housing. Shotover is part of a private estate, and the subject of a peculiar Daily Mail article from 2010 entitled, “Queen’s friend calls in police after his
estate is overrun with people having outdoor sex”.

On a warm sunny day, the sloping field to the South is fi lled with young children playing ball, and families barbecuing or sitting on rugs. On one such unique day, when sun, breeze and even weekend accomplished a stunning afternoon, I was offered chicken wings and a drink by a friendly Albanian couple before I set off to discover the endless minute valleys, grassy clearings and woods.

These small woods are surprising in their variety; one moment one is surrounded by tall oaks, the next by ash, birch, hazel or willow. All these trees, and the rich wildlife which surrounds them, is meticulously noted, recorded and published in leaflets by Shotover Wildlife, a small organisation run by local volunteers.

But right now it’s not sunny: it’s nearing midnight, and we’re not so concerned with the names of the trees or the wealth of the wildlife around us. Sitting in a comfortable oak, we look down into the valley to Botley, the lights a sea of gloworms.

Places are not the same by night. They are transformed. Shapes and forms take on different sizes, colours and shades. Perspective becomes
blurred, sounds sharper. When I first began going on nightwalks, making short outings to Addison’s walk, I was often scared, on edge, even in the safe surroundings of college walls. But soon I came to endorse the dark; I enjoyed noting the differences, appreciating my newly darkened, muted surroundings as a different place entirely.

I soon became fascinated by the shape of branches against the dimmed sky; sinewy black ink rivulets upon a pastel shade.

We walk down from Shotover and cross the bypass; the lights on the street glare and confuse our eyes, and I wish I had slept there.

Country Diary: The Water Meadow

0

The water meadow goes through an incredible transformation at this time of the year. Having spent months submerged by the rising waters, like a smaller version, isolated and walled, of Port Meadow, the grass blooms with purple Snakeshead fritillaries around the beginning of April. Such a display of purple bloom is not common – there are few places where the purple petals can be seen growing in such numbers, despite being recorded in this particular spot since 1785. 

These delicate, spotty, dangling violet cups, however, do not last long, and briefly the colour in the meadow recedes to a dull green for a few weeks.
Nevertheless, the yellow sparkle of wild buttercups slowly starts to adorn the field. The flowers rise at first tentatively out of the tall grass, forming isolated pockets of bright colour, before fully asserting themselves as a powdery sea of yellow.

In typical Oxford fashion, intruders are most unwelcome in this sacred patch of yellow and green, an untouched holy land into which very few are nevertheless not tempted to trample once or twice during their degrees.
“Under no circumstances should any students enter the Deer park. We will treat this extremely seriously.”

Permeated for half the year by the threatening bark of male deer, the field is suitably empty for the more adventurous undergraduates to trample into by the time it gives over to a yellow jungle.

After dark, the endeavour feels most like an adventure. On a warm night, “the warmest night of the decade”, we jump over the metal bars into the thick grass and walk across the field tentatively, listening to the scratching of a delicate claw on rough bark, or the flow of the Isis/Cherwell/Thames, ever reminiscent of the meadow’s purpose – to be covered by a shallow veil of water.

Walking back home on a summer’s night, one often bumps in to a group of tramps lighting a fire across the river – metres away – in a bizarre, tangible reminder of the Bubble.

But perhaps on a glazed summer’s day the magical reality of this most exceptional spot can be felt at its best. Pleasantly woozy, dazed by the brilliant Trinity sun, a frolic, a skip and a jump through this thickly threaded yellow tapestry is an experience like no other.

It’s a moment of blind delight, of timelessness in the face of the crunching passage of time; soon, the deer will be back, munching away at the tough grass; soon the waters will be back again, reflecting the tower in its shallow depths at night; soon the fritillaries will be emerging, to begin the cycle again, and the final stretch of academic entitlement will be laid bare.

But not now. At this specific fragment of time, delicate and fleeting as a sheet of glass, the yellow powder, flying from the buttercups as we run and dance and chase, has gathered on my trousers, giving them a golden wash. I brush off the fairy powder as we climb out into the open again, back into the (semi) real world.

Country Diary: Fiddler’s Island

0

Port Meadow looks different before a swim. It is colder and wilder, perhaps because your whole consciousness is focussed on the river. The river is what frames the meadow – it is the point at which the land stops being Our Oxford and starts being “the wilderness” leading on to Binsey and the woods beyond. If you look at a map, you can see the way that the Cherwell encloses the city, creating pockets of land with names and personalities – meadows, allotments, and parks.

Just south of Port Meadow is an area of land called Fiddler’s Island, where the Medley Bridge leads to a fork in the river which separates the Thames from Castle Mill Stream and the Oxford Canal. Here you find an area of water which was authorised for public bathing in 1852. There are other places to swim in the city – Parson’s Pleasure, Tumbling Bay. Worcester Lake has been done by many, as has Uni Parks and the divided stream of the Cherwell under Magdalen Bridge. But there is something about Port Meadow, its simultaneous closeness and removed-ness from the city, which makes it a good place to start for prospective wild swimmers.

At college, we bundle up like children going to the seaside – towels, jumpers, flip-flops. But it’s only April, and it’s a grey day, and there’s an air of trepidation as well as excitement in the walk through Jericho and over the railway bridge. We have done this in January, February and March, in three jumpers and a coat, when the river was flooded and wild and even the ducks sat on the canal boats fearing the strength of the current. The water was a whirlpool – too dangerous to jump in, we lowered ourselves down, holding onto the bridge to avoid being swept downstream. This time though, we brace ourselves and jump, eyes closed and breath held.

There’s a wonderful feeling of freedom that comes from being in the water, especially here where it is deep enough to kick your legs out without touching river-bed. It’s not like swimming in the sea, where you feel like the waves are washing you clean. The water of the Thames is brown and murky, and we emerge with mud and scratches on our bodies from climbing out over the bank, skin raw and pink and hastily covered in towels and clothing. This is not a baptism in the sense of feeling cleansed and refreshed by the water – in fact you feel like you need a long bath and bed as soon as possible.

But it is a rite. This is how you become part of the Meadow – reclaim it as something human. Not in the way that destroys trees, and erects housing complexes and roads, but in the way that makes humans an intrinsic part of the landscape, and it a part of us. Swimming in summer, when the Meadow is buzzing with people, this feeling is more acute. People line up to watch the crazy students playing on the rope swing on Fiddler’s Island.
The river is a part of the personality of Oxford, where rowing and punting and crossing the Magdalen bridge are part of the daily fabric of life. These things are also what separate us from real life. This is what you feel when swimming – that nowhere else could being in the river mean quite so much.

Country Diary: Wytham Woods

0

Wytham Woods – pronounced “white-am” – lie at the northwestern edge of Port Meadow, on a hill which lies vigilant beyond the endless field.

The hand-drawn map supplied to passholders in itself fuels the natural imagination: Rough Common, Healing’s Copse, The Singing Way, My Lady’s Seat, Five Sisters, and Marley Wood are all pencilled in among the criss-crossing lines denoting woods, paths and fields.

These names all suggest familiarity and association; they hold in their very names decades of human exploration and attachment.

Wytham Woods, a Site of Special Scientific Interest, are used by the University for biological research, and are meant to be one of the most studied areas of woodland in the world.

It’s my birthday. We walk up to Wytham on a muted March evening, which wind and grey clouds threaten to damped. We pass Godstow Nunnery and make the slow climb to the wooden gates leading officially into the woods.
It’s unusual being in a wood which is also a scientific laboratory. The area covered by the protected forest is only a few square miles – enough for a refreshing stroll but not quite sufficient to challenge muscles or breath.

All around, birdhuts, used to monitor the great tit population, hang from old oaks, whilst in the open fields, nets are drawn over small patches of grass to measure their growth. Metal scaffolding stands skeleton-like among the upper branches of old trees.

There’s something comforting about being surrounded by trees. The perspective of looking through rows and rows of vertical boughs, sometimes, in the distance, matching up in a straight line, or otherwise opening up, allowing the eye to reach further, is cleansing.

In such a forest there is of course much more than visual pleasure; there’s the sound of wind bending and creaking age-old timber, or the whiff of damp leaves, the smell of air, damp, imbued with life.

The forest, as we walk along the Singing Way to the Great Wood, is quiet. All around us there is flourishing life, and yet a form of life which exists on a completely different timescale to the one we know. No wonder that forests have served as a source of contemplation and inspiration for so many centuries.

As we enter the Great Wood, the large trunks of oak and ash make way for younger sprouts of hazel. The path winds down into a small valley and a light rattling sound fills our ears. The sound rises and falls like an eerie natural composition. At first wonderfully inexplicable, we soon discover that the sound comes from thousands of small metal circles nailed on to individual trees to keep track of their growth and position. A deer crosses the increasingly winding path, takes a brief, striking look back, before springing away.

It’s getting dark now, and wearied limbs are calling for a much-needed rest. Soon boots hit tarmac again, and eventually we’re crossing Port Meadow’s deep mud, just as the rain, previously threatening and now lashing, drenches us to the bone.

Review: Vico

0

Watching a play in the dark, claustrophobic setting of the BT is never a light-hearted experience. Especially when said play deals with the psychopathic insanity of one protagonist and the gradual descent into insanity of the other. But then who said theatre had to be light-hearted?

Vico, written and directed by first-year undergraduate, Douglas Taylor, is the story of a highly intelligent sociopath who, through a variety of games and manipulations tries to drive her psychotherapist, Finn, mad.

At the very start of the play the over-confident, Vico strides in and makes the revelation that she killed her mother, by stabbing her in the face. Over the course of the next few therapy sessions, she skips, eats a banana, brings in dead birds, plays head and tales and relentlessly provokes and attacks her undeserving therapist, playing on her every insecurity: ‘You’re barren! It died….your child.’  

The play is well-paced to show how Finn slowly crumbles under the pressure from Vico. At one pivotal moment the two swap seats to show the reversal of roles and at the end of the play Finn finally submits to Vico’s demand that she should refer to her by her first name and not as ‘Miss Moretti’. Vico’s refrain that ‘nothing is original’ because of the ‘cycle of life’, the constant repetition of which itself emphasizes her point, turns out to be tragically accurate. Why both of the main female characters have male names, however, remains unexplained to the very end. 

Sarah Abdoo delivers an energetic and accomplished performance as Vico, but the star of the play is Kimberley Sadovich, who expertly embodies the uptight therapist with a gradually deteriorating grasp on reality. The hapless work experience boy (Jonas Hoersch), though he provides a few cheap chuckles when he repeatedly interrupts the emotionally fraught therapy sessions to ask for staples, is somewhat of a cliché.The brief but touching scenes between Finn and her husband (James Baird) provide some welcome punctuation in the tense environment of the play. 

The set is perfect. The black leather chairs are exactly the type one would expect to find in a swanky Harley St. Clinic. The hanging picture frames and mirrors create a slightly otherworldly feel, as does the eerie electronic sound backing, which is an interesting mix of extra-terrestrial tones and Southern American jingles.

This play is a mesmerising piece of theatre, by turn horribly tragic and darkly comic. For all its virtues, I’m glad it is no longer than an hour, because after a while the erratic behaviour of the central characters and ambiguous allusions of the script made me feel like I myself was starting to go a bit potty.  

Country Diary: Port Meadow

0

In his recent book of poetry inspired by Port Meadow, David Atwooll allows that “It’s a peopled place / of course: painted landscapes often need, somewhere, a red smudge”.

One would struggle to describe Port Meadow as a “wild” place. Flanked by a busy railway track and surrounded on all sides by the physical presence of city life, Port Meadow is hardly a remote natural spot; it acts rather as an oasis close to Oxford’s centre. But perhaps it’s this human element that adds to its sense of place.

Most students who feel the pull of natural places have soon exhausted the charm and tidiness of their college gardens or Christ Church meadows; often their first destination in search of a slightly more rugged, remote place is this seemingly endless expanse of grass and mud.

Port Meadow is steeped in myth; it’s the unploughed landscape, the land earned from resisting the Danes, a sacred spot where the Freemen graze their cattle.

It is, nevertheless, a changing landscape, an idea which is captured in Atwooll’s poetry, collected in his pamphlet Ground Work. Illustrated by Andrew Walton, the collection explores the various phases of Port Meadow, from “veiled in mist and frost” to an “archipelago of pools” as the flood which mantles the flat land for months on end begins to recede.

Ash, willow and Gerard Manley Hopkins’ Binsey Poplars (“All felled, felled, are all felled”) stand scatterred along along the grassy edges.

To the West, the Isis soaks its banks on the meadow, tempting an intrepid swimmer to be carried gently down the water by a strong current as a sunny day comes to its lengthy close. 

Just across the thick grass, to the East, lies Burgess Field, a small forest which has regenerated on a reclaimed landfill site. The young forest stands immutable as a poignant reminder of the visitor’s transcience.

The meadow is alive. Birds rise in throngs or poke about alone — herons picking the puddled grass for small fish, dunlin with their long arched beaks, as well as geese, gulls, godwits, warblers and the occasional glide of a peregrine or a buzzard.

Horses and cattle share the flat, undulating land at alternating times of the year, allowed only when the creeping waters of the flood don’t leave them stranded.

Port meadow: a meadow turned habour by the winter floods; a field made jolly on sunny afternoons by sweet wine. At night, across the water, Wolvercote flickers in the distance like a seaside town.

And yet it remains, in Atwooll’s words, a “peopled place”. For this landscape is not all sunny walks and natural beauty. Open spaces like this have always attracted questionable activities after nightfall. Such sites are as often places of enjoyment and pleasure as they are sites of reflection, sorrow, despair.

Only the other day, a pink princess outfit, with white frills on the shoulders, glinting glitter, hung from a hawthorn on the edge of the railway track. As a train rushed past, the wind lifted the dress and it blew listelessly, light, to and fro on the tree’s side. The remnants of a moment, opaque, unfinished, vanished.