Thursday, May 15, 2025
Blog Page 1377

Oxford MP criticises pro-life adverts on Oxford buses

0

Andrew Smith MP has added his voice to criticisms of the charity LIFE after a counsellor for the pro-life group linked abortion to breast cancer in an Oxford advice clinic. Smith says in this week’s Cherwell that he has reported the charity to the Advertising Standards Agency for “giving the unrealistic impression that LIFE is offering impartial counselling.”

In a report by sexual health charity Brook, it emerged that the counsellor at the LIFE CPC (Crisis Pregnancy Centre) told an undercover reporter, “The only other thing that has been reported with quite strong evidence is the increase in the possibility of breast cancer following termination of the pregnancy.”

This is despite the fact that a 2008 report from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists concluded that, “induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk.”

The same Oxford counsellor is also recorded as telling a woman, “It is possible that you will be on your own when you abort your baby, you know, possibly in the toilet, that’s what usually happens,” which Anne Scanlan, spokesperson for LIFE, has since described as “ill-advised,” adding, “if this counsellor was not asked about that and offered it up without prompt, then that is against our policy.”

CPCs such as the LIFE Oxford Centre, which has advertised on Oxford buses, are intended to only give advice and are independent of the NHS. Consequently they are unregulated by the same standards as the health services. LIFE themselves state on their website, in response to a Telegraph article that revealed many similar practices in CPCs, “There is a time and a place for discussing the potential health consequences of abortion… but this must be strictly evidence based.”

Simon Blake OBE, Chief Executive of Brook said, “It is simply immoral and unacceptable to masquerade as a service that helps clients make decisions through exploring choices, when the reality is – as this report based on young women’s experience shows – at some CPCs you will get a mixture of misinformation, coercion, and fright tactics”.

LIFE claims on their website that they give “as much practical, financial, and emotional support as is necessary to help them bring their pregnancy to term.” Although unregulated by health commissioners, they are still subject to the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy’s Ethical Framework, which states that, “Practitioners should not allow their professional relationships with clients to be prejudiced by any personal views they may hold.”

Sarah Pine, OUSU Woman’s Officer, pointed to other available resources in her response to the report, “Women are only free if they have control over their own bodies. Reproductive rights are crucial because they enable women to gain independence from their partners, and have a life outside of childbearing and rearing. Groups that intentionally mislead women in order to prevent them from accessing these services are making decisions for them. We can do better than that.

“OUSU’s Student Advice Service is completely non-directive, and so won’t tell anyone what is the best choice for them. If anyone is concerned about unplanned pregnancy, we can outline what the options are and how to go about them, and leave the choice up to the student. You can reach them at [email protected].”

LIFE told Cherwell, “We are investigating the incident and will take appropriate action.”

Brook has called for a full scale redevelopment of the CPC service.

History special subjects restricted

0

The History Faculty has cut the number of Special Subjects open to the largest number of students. Only three subjects will be “24-capped”, offering up to 24 places, the maximum number for Special Subjects.

Special Subject options for historians are decided using a balloting process, where each student registers three choices for the paper, one of which must be a course with 24 places, the largest number available.

Dr Andrea Hopkins, History Faculty Administrative Officer, explained, “Because so many of the most popular subjects have a cap of 8 or 16, we have to hold a ballot to determine which students can study them. The students must therefore give two other alternate Special Subject choices in the event that they are unsuccessful in the ballot. One of these must be for a subject with a large cap – 24.”

However, the three Special Course options capped at 24 this year are all either ancient or early modern history. As a result, some students expressed concerns over being forced to choose a Special Subject option that falls outside their area of interest.

Dr Sue Doran, Senior Research Fellow in History at Jesus College, pointed out that the problem with uncapped subjects, “has been an issue for many years.”
Dr Robin Briggs, Senior Research Fellow and Lecturer in Modern History at All Souls, stated, “the situation would indeed be rather ridiculous, if the only available second choices were in a period very few students would naturally opt for.”

In addition, other Special Subjects were dropped altogether, although one option on Nazi Germany, for which some historians had been learning German in preparation, has since been reinstated by the History Faculty.

A historian at Exeter commented, “I luckily wasn’t one of the ones left in the lurch when the Nazi Germany paper was briefly called off, however there is a disappointing lack of choice in the so-called Special Subjects, and it is a shame that whole areas of history, such as gender, social and cultural, have been excluded from the capped subjects.”

Dr Briggs further commented, “The reason for the caps is simply that there are not enough tutors for some courses. That tends to vary from year to year as well, because particular academics take research leave, something that has become more of a problem now there are so many schemes for extended leave. So there could be particular bottlenecks in any given year.

Dr Hopkins also pointed out that, “in 2013-14, 215 students got into their first choice subjects, and 76 had to go into another subject.” She went on to say, “the percentage is that 74% got into their first choice subject.”

One second year historian said, “After your first and second choices you have to go through a reserve list of another three choices before you get left with your 24-capped option. That means you’ve got five chances before you have to do something you’re not particularly interested in. Although they’re called special subjects, they’re really just normal subjects. There shouldn’t be such a fuss.”

Exeter students go on indefinite hall strike

0

Exeter College students have begun a hall boycott after an emergency JCR meeting was held on Sunday to reaffirm the decision and discuss alternative eating options.

The JCR voted last week to hold a hall boycott to protest against the disproportionately high living costs faced by students compared to other colleges, particularly against the £840 annual catering charge that is paid by students living in.

In a piece written for Cherwell, Richard Collett-White explained the basis of the strike. He noted that students are required to pay £280 “simply for the privilege of setting foot in the only on-site eating place.”

He said, “JCR and MCR have passed motions calling for a hall boycott and regular protests, as a symbolic act of defiance.”

The strike follows a motion in the JCR and MCR passed last week seconded by over 100 students, which said, “the catering charge for students living in is ludicrous.”

It went on, “College did not negotiate properly on rent last year and are totally intransigent on the catering charge issue. Further discussion with College is futile until they start listening.”

Since Trinity, Exeter students have tweeting using the hashtags ‘#FTCC’ (‘Fuck the Catering Charge’) and #CTCC (‘Cancel the Catering Charge).

The college’s Rector, Frances Cairncross, told Cherwell, “We have already been in talks with our students and hope to continue to explore options. Meanwhile, we are sorry that they should boycott the College’s catering provision.”

A Facebook group called ‘Exeter College Hallternatives’ has organised eating options for the boycott by connecting Exeter students with other colleges. JCRs including Balliol, St. Hilda’s, Linacre, and fellow Turl Street colleges Lincoln and Jesus, have offered to take people for lunch and dinner. Balliol has offered students discount ‘Balliol Blues’, while Wadham SU has palso assed a motion of solidarity with Exeter. 

The catering manager for the ‘Hallternatives’ said, “Most people in college are totally behind the boycott, and we have received a lot of support from other JCRs as well. As far as negotiations with college go, we haven’t heard too much back, but it is early days.

This Wednesday saw a major day of action, with students from both the JCR and MCR marching through college and Turl Street holding banners. The protest was followed by a ‘Welfare Dinner’ organised by the JCR.

The initial proposal was to try and find a way to make hall more efficient, but the general consensus has changed with students now calling for the college to bare more of the loss hall makes, in keeping with other colleges.

One access volunteer and finalist at Exeter told Cherwell, “With one kitchen for 144 people, nobody took the decision to boycott lightly.

“Following Tom Rutland’s mention of the boycott in his e-mail, we’ve had loads of offers of help from students at other colleges, this is a fantastic display of student solidarity.

“Battels at Exeter are 20% above the median. That scale of variation is not healthy in a university, especially given Oxford already has a bad reputation for being too expensive for many students.”

According to information sent out by the JCR to students, Exeter has the highest catering charge in Oxford by a margin of £116 per term and according to recent OUSU statistics it is the second most expensive college for students living in. It is estimated that, with the catering charge factored in, the cost of eating in hall for someone living in is around £13 a day.

The JCR information also said that Exeter is ranked bottom in Oxford for Living Cost satisfaction according to the ‘Oxford Student Barometer’, making general satisfaction over 30% lower than the average.

Lucy McCann, a first year at Exeter said, “I’ve spoken to many Exeter students who’ve told me that had they known about the catering charge, they wouldn’t have applied to the college; I certainly wouldn’t have myself.

“Not only is the charge unfair, it’s a massive access issue for the college.”
The protests are expected to continue until the end of term.

We must reassess our approach to international students

0

It seems bizarre that a university that spends so much time, money and effort on ensuring that it admits only the best and brightest in all other areas should impose such restrictive criteria on international students wanting to study at Oxford.

International students are ineligible for most scholarships, bursaries and hardship funds, and have to pay huge fees that mean only the wealthiest of overseas students can study at Oxford.

This is not entirely the fault of the University, given that fee rates are often set at a national level, and visa and immigration issues are out of Oxford’s control. However, the university should pressure national bodies to ease these restrictions; it is, after all, in their interest.

The cultural aspect is another issue entirely. The tendency for international students to converge in international societies, often remaining isolated from the rest of the student community is an issue for anyone who thinks that a vibrant international student body is worth promoting.

The UK is a multi-cultural, ethnically diverse country in which minorities are more integrated than in most European countries, but arrivals are not always as well-received as one would hope. One need only look a few miles north of Oxford to find the Campsfield detention centre, where illegal immigrants are held in controversial conditions. Whilst the situation is clearly not so extreme with students, many internationals, often facing a language and cultural barrier, find themselves shunned from the UK social scene.

If Oxford wants to remain at the cutting edge of academic excellence, surely a wealth of international diversity is essential. Ensuring equality of access, rejecting stereotypes and welcoming our fellow foreign students is the best way to go about this.

"We try to problem solve for international students"

0

The International Students’ Campaign (ISC) is one of the Oxford University Student Union’s six autonomous equal opportunity campaigns. We are a student run organization committed to representing and improving the welfare of the 6,500 international students from 139 different countries at our University. We understand how hectic and bewildering it is upon arrival at Oxford, and one of our key objectives is to make the transition easier. Our projects in the past have included the Insurance Workshop for International Students, the International Ice Cream and Brownie Night, International Brunch and the annual Oxford International Festival.

Oxford has a large international student population, but spread out in different colleges, the students are not very well connected. We aim to provide an inter-college social platform by organizing opportunities for international students to meet and bond with each other.

This term we helped organize the competition for the National Societies Grant with International Strategy, and awarded £300 to the Oxford University Korea Society for their Soul of Seoul event, £300 to the Oxford University Asia-Pacific Society for their Asian Foods and Arts Festival, and £150 to the Oxford University Lithuanian Society for their Commemoration of Lithuanian Independence event.

This term we are also holding the International Festival, the second biggest event in Oxford of the year next to the Fresher Fair. Last year, we had over 1500 visitors, including the University’s Vice Chancellor, and this year, we are expecting even more. The event will take place from 11am to 4pm on Sunday 2nd March at the Oxford Town Hall. It is free entry, and will include stalls representing Oxford’s national and cultural societies selling unique items and cuisine from their homeland at a low price. There will also be performances through the afternoon, showcasing some of Oxford’s most talented cultural troupes. In future, we plan to have Easter Drinks to gather together both international and British students who stay in Oxford over the break. Next year, we’re planning to work with international reps of each college and the national societies in Oxford to have weekly afternoon tea events and even hold a ball.

Aside from strengthening the international community at Oxford, we try to problem-solve for international students. Some international students feel coming to Oxford is a leap into the unknown, and while the international reps of each college help deal with welfare problems, some international students still not well-integrated into the college system. In an effort to serve those students, we’re providing a university-level help channel.

Oxford don in sexism row

0

Oxford Classics fellow Robin Lane Fox has sparked controversy for writing in a newspaper column that “a woman’s evening dress should look like an apparently stormable fortress.”

The comment was made in a gardening column reviewing an exhibition on the interplay between fashion and the floral for the Financial Times weekend supplement. Lane Fox’s choice of words has lead to condemnation by some students.

Lucy Delaney, WomCam Chair, said, “I feel that these comments are misogynistic and reflective of the view that it is acceptable for men to govern the way women dress for the sole purpose of their own sexual gratification. His negative reaction to the Valentino dress on the grounds that it seemed impenetrable or not ‘stormable’ is aggressive and unacceptable.”

When asked to clarify the meaning of his statement, Lane Fox claimed to have been misquoted. “I was echoing someone else’s remark… a famous designer. It should have read ‘apparently impregnable’, in actual fact,” he told Cherwell. In response to Cherwell’s inquiries, he added, “Your criteria for casual misogny are rather broad?”

Lane Fox is Emeritus Fellow of New College, Garden Master and Extraordinary Lecturer of both New and Exeter Colleges, and Reader in Ancient History for the University of Oxford. He has published major works on topics ranging from Alexander the Great to paganism, early Christianity and Islam under the Roman Empire, as well as writing and presenting documentaries for the BBC.
Other students defended Lane Fox’s remarks. “Taken in context, it’s not as bad as it sounds,” commented a female historian. “There are definitely a lot of professors here with antiquated views though – this kind of vocabulary doesn’t surprise me.”

Lane’s “apparently stormable fortress” remark refers to a dress made of fabric and wire by designer Valentino Garavani, about which he also commented, “It looks as though I would need secateurs… I hope she is wearing bunches of violets on her underwear, the flowers that keen gardeners best like to discover on the final layer.”

Helen Thomas, a member of WomCam, told Cherwell, “It is what keeps women underrepresented and subordinate… it’s lazy and cheap, and extremely damaging. The best way to fight sexism is to stand up to these unwitty utterances,” she said.

One Classics undergraduate remarked, “What a charmer. Although I understand the point he’s trying to get across, it’s phrased in too violating a way, such that it’s throwing out a whole load of connotations about male sexual dominance.”

The Financial Times editorial staff could not be reached for comment about the content of Lane Fox’s column.

Cherwell investigates: Oxford’s international students

0

In a recent article for Cherwell, Cheriel Neo condemned “the everyday experience of inhospitality and apathy that international students face” in Oxford. The comments reopened debate about the treatment of international students in the university. The issues revolve around questions of access, diversity and transparency in the admissions system, whilst an increasing number of Oxford students are calling for changes in the ways in which Oxford University treats students from overseas.

The issue is relevant beyond Oxford; there is an important national context which must also be considered. With recent concerns over immigration in Britain, more constraints are being imposed amongst international students, with last year’s ban on London Metropolitan University enrolling international students and the threat of expulsion from the country for current students the most emotive example of the often precarious situation which international students endure. This week C+ takes a closer look at the difficulties international students face in Oxford, speaking to students about their experiences.

According to official terminology, the term ‘international’ refers to students applying from countries outside of the EU. These students, hailing from over 140 different countries pay separate degree fees depending on their course, and complete separate immigration applications before the university places can be officially confirmed.

Close to 40% of Oxford’s student body – a total of 8,400 students – is comprised by students from overseas, although this figure includes students from the European Union. Among undergraduates, 16% come from overseas, with the figure rising to 62% for graduates. As a point of comparison, the UK national average for international students is 13% at undergraduate level and 46% for graduate students.

Amongst EU countries, the best represented in Oxford were Italy, France, Germany and Ireland. Outside of the EU, the US dominates the international student population, with 1,486 students, followed closely by Chinese students, of whom there are currently 908. 41% of Oxford University’s staff are citizens of foreign countries.

A spokesperson for Oxford University highlighted the importance of this diversity commenting, “Oxford’s university community is truly international with students coming from 138 countries. Many nationalities have their own societies which organise social events for students and staff and the collegiate system means that students have access to support from a close community of students and academics from the UK and around the world.”

However, many students have criticised the University’s treatment of international students. A student from New Zealand studying at Christ Church, told C+ that “Being an international student is a huge drag on your parents’ finances. Not only do you pay international fees, but you don’t get any access to student loans, college/university bursaries or any college safety net. Even things home students take for granted, such as a grant to stay in college for academic purposes over the vacation, is barred from you, as part of it comes from home office funds.”

Commenting on the issue of cultural adaptation, he added that “international students tend to be on the extremes of getting involved in University life. Many internationals  are virtual recluses, staying in their rooms working insane hours and never being seen outside.

“I think it can often be quite a culture shock for people who come from more conservative cultures, and I don’t think they really often get the help they need to find their feet. Making up for this is the fact that there are a lot of student societies who often fill that space. Singapore, Hong Kong, Russia, Malaysia are examples of student societies where everyone of that nationality tends to know each other in the University.”

A spokesperson for the University, however, insisted that there are provisions in place for international students. “There are a range of scholarships available for international students, such as the Clarendon Scholarships which offer over 130 new scholarships each year to talented students from around the world. We are constantly fundraising for new scholarships to support international students. For example, the Ertegun Scholarships were recently established for the most talented students in the humanities.

“The University has a Student Information and Advisory Service which can help international students by providing information about visa conditions and important legal obligations, help with extending visas, advice about travelling outside the UK, and the rules about working when on a student visa.”

A graduate student who wished to remain anonymous insisted that even this support is often still not enough. “As a white American, I’m not eligible for many university-wide scholarships. I didn’t apply for Rhodes or the Fulbright as I didn’t think I was a realistic candidate; at the moment, I think and hope most of the funding for my MPhil research is going to come from outside sources, for example museums who might be interested in my findings.”

However there is often an impression that international students form an “invisible minority” in college life. Ng Li Ki, President of the Oxford University Malaysia and Singapore Students Association (OUMSSA) spoke to C+ about this issue. “It’s not a feeling, it’s definitely the case [that this minority exists]. Most of these tend to be East Asian international students – European internationals and Americans tend to integrate fairly seamlessly. There might be a further explanation in that international students tend to do science/engineering subjects, which demand far more in terms of contact time, and therefore they have less time for socializing.

“It bothers me. Even people who integrate successfully often do so at the expense of playing down their nationality. The weight of stereotypes being thrown around, language barriers, etcetera present formidable obstacles. National student societies help internationals cope, and once a sphere is formed, there are people who stop trying to straddle both their friends from home, and the possibility of new friendships here.”

A considerable proportion of the undergraduate international student population at Oxford is comprised of visiting students, many of whom also pay considerable premiums for an Oxford experience, although many students come here for one term only.

Such is the case with the Stanford in Oxford programme, which gives Stanford students the opportunity to spend a term or more at one of three Oxford colleges, Magdalen, Corpus Christi and Brasenose. All Stanford exchange students live in “Stanford House” on the High Street. Some students have criticised the fact that, in exchange, only six Oxford students have the chance to spend a mere three weeks in Stanford.

According to the Stanford In Oxford Programme, “Stanford pay fees for their students to come here and these are passed onto the relevant college.”

One student, who wished to remain anonymous, commented, “They’re clearly disguising a money-making scheme under the pretence of a genuine academic exchange. It makes me wonder to what extent these – no doubt bright – international students’ academic needs are truly satiated by their time in Oxford if the main purpose of their being here is to the economic benefit of the University.”

A recent internal report by the University of Oxford voiced concerns that high fee-paying “associate members” may be threatening the academic reputation of the University. A spokesperson for the University told C+ that, “Visiting students contribute diversity to student bodies in colleges and the wider university, enhancing the educational experience which they provide. Visiting students gain admission to the University on the basis of academic merit, their academic experience is broadly equivalent to that received by matriculated students, and they are integrated into each college’s undergraduate community.”

Despite the difficulties they face, international students are a growing demographic in British universities. Whilst undergraduate applications by UK students fell by 7.4% across the country, the number of students applying from outside the EU increased by 2.3% in the 2012-13 cycle.

What to do about the Catering charge?

0

Nobody likes bills, but to be told in Freshers’ Week that in order to begin your studies, you are required to pay £280 simply for the privilege of setting foot in the only on-site eating place is something else.

Such is the fate of every student at Exeter College. Exonians have long wondered why other colleges manage to provide an affordable service while they have to budget at least £85 a week just for food. Indeed, to look at the healthy surplus detailed in our yearly Donors’ Report and yet to accept battels as fair would amount to a sort of masochism. After years of discontent on the part of the student common rooms, the problem of the dreaded Catering Charge has finally come to a head. So both JCR and MCR have passed motions calling for a hall boycott and regular protests, as a symbolic act of defiance.

Students are taking this opportunity to make plain their opposition to the high cost of eating at Exeter, relative to other colleges, with the intention of forcing the SCR’s attention onto this perennial problem and hopefully stirring their consciences in the process.

College management are viewed by most as possessing a bloody-minded intransigence when it comes to money, with previous student representatives claiming to have been “steam-rolled” through rent negotiations. Because after all, students are to be seen and not heard – yet another nod to Oxford’s almost Victorian ways.

As well as pushing students into hardship, the Catering Charge is opposed on grounds of Access. If Exeter wants to take its work in this area seriously – which I sincerely hope it does – something must be done about this obstacle to attracting less well-off applicants. The Rector has said herself that one of her greatest regrets is the lack of success the college has had with Access during her time here. I don’t think it is a mere coincidence that we rank both top of the table for living costs and near-bottom for state school intake. It’s all very well to say we provide hardship bursaries – but then so does every college!

Our high living costs make for a college in discord. Virtually no one has a positive word to say about the college authorities, and relations between the SCR and student common rooms couldn’t get much worse. Let’s hope our demonstration yesterday (with chants of “We’ve got beef!”, “Less cash for mash!”, and “We’ll fight our battels and win!”) had some impact. One thing should be clear to College: given our heavy dependence on alumni donations, the current strategy is surely one of staggering, self-defeating short-sightedness.

 

New IRA claims responsibility for Oxford bomb

0

More details have emerged about the suspicious package sent to the Armed Forces Recruitment Office on St Giles last Thursday. The device was a “crude but viable” anti-personnel weapon containing with black powder, according to counter terrorism analysis.

A spokesperson for the Oxford University Officers’ Training Corps (OUOTC) told Cherwell, “The devices in question represented crude but viable anti-personnel weapons, sent to recruitment offices at four locations around the country, including Oxford”.

“They were sent to recruitment offices in A5 jiffy bags, and contained black powder. The effect of ignition would not have been an explosion, but a fireball targeted at whoever opened the package”.

The news comes after Scotland Yard confirmed that a group believed to be the New IRA claimed responsibility for the devices sent to recruiting offices around the South of England on 12 and 13 February. The Irish News published a statement attributed to the New IRA reading, “The IRA claims responsibility for the explosive devices that were sent to British armed forces recruitment centres in England.

It concluded, “Attacks will continue when and where the IRA see fit.”

A spokesperson for Scotland Yard said, “We are aware of the claim of responsibility for the devices that were sent to Army recruitment centres in England last week.

“The claim was received on Saturday February 15 by a Northern Irish media outlet using a recognised codeword. The claim was allegedly made on behalf of the ‘IRA’”.

The OUOTC spokesperson clarified, “The packages aroused suspicion from the outset as they had Republic of Ireland postmarks, meaning detection was likely. The Army’s alert status is currently at ‘substantial’, meaning we are at a heightened alert, in anticipation of any further threats”.

The Official IRA’s armed stockpile was decommissioned in 2010, but a number of splinter groups have persisted with dissident activities. It is understood that the current New IRA was formed after the merger of two such groups in 2012.

The OUOTC spokesperson said, “All staff at Falklands House [where the Oxford University Officer Training Corps, Air Squadron and Royal Naval Unit conduct training] are aware of the relevant evacuation procedures should a similar package or device be discovered on site”.

Scotland Yard urged the public to remain vigilant and report suspicious activity or behaviour to their Anti-Terrorist Hotline.

Students protest against Oxford investments

0

Students rallied outside the Radcliffe Camera last Friday in a further attempt to limit university investment in fossil fuels.

The rally has been accompanied by the passage of motions in 11 JCRs and MCRs. The campaign was backed by Oxford East MP Andrew Smith, and is a continuation of the protests against British Gas which took place in November of last year.

Across the UK universities, UCL, Glasgow and Imperial College London were the target of student protests. Participants held marches, rallies and petition presentations, as part of Fossil Free Friday, intended to pressure authorities to alter their investment patterns.

JCRs motions have noted findings by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that 60-80% of fossil fuels must be left in the ground in order to avoid “dangerous” climate change.

The campaign plans to meet with the university’s Socially Responsible Investment Review Committee in 7th week. A seminar is also being held next Wednesday at St. Hilda’s where a university spokesperson will explain their stance on divestment.

James Rainey, who helped organise the rally, commented, “By planning to fully exploit their reserves, fossil fuel companies are behaving in a socially irresponsible way which undermines the future of students, and hence we do not believe that the university or colleges can continue to invest their endowments with them”.

He went on, “At our event on Friday we tried to raise the profile of our campaign, which is fully supported by 11 common rooms and the OUSU council. It was great that so many people turned out in spite of the miserable weather, showing how strongly students and Oxford residents feel about fossil fuel divestment”.

Beth Jones, Jesus College JCR Green rep, commented, “I am pleased to see the start of progressive action to rectify the university’s current policy of investing in such damaging fuels.”

She said, “There are greener investment alternatives that rallies, such as this one, draw attention to and I hope that Fossil Fuel Friday has successfully sent a message that there is a genuine desire for change among the student body.”