Friday 27th June 2025
Blog Page 1407

The OUSU View: Tom Rutland, OUSU President

0

Whilst I don’t share the politics of the ‘Reclaim OUSU’ slate from last term’s elections, I’ve never heard exactly what OUSU is put so well. Every student herein Oxford is a member of OUSU, whether their common room is affiliated or not.

Do Oxford students deserve a better student union? Of course they do. That’s why ran to be OUSU President, and it’s why I’ve made increasing OUSU’s budget my priority for the year. OUSU isn’t the student union that Oxford students deserve because the University has starved it of funding for years: in 2012, the SU’s block grant was less than£400,000 compared to the Russell Group average of £1.6 million.

But the caricature I saw presented of OUSU by proponents of Oriel JCR’s disaffiliation motion didn’t accurately represent the hard work of the full-time and part-time student officers I work with. What has OUSU ever done for students? It has won first year exam resits, the most generous bursaries in the country and Sunday opening hours for the Rad Cam, to name just three things.

Claims that OUSU wasn’t representative of students when it opposed the idea of fees spiralling up towards £16k simply do not stand; OUSU Council’s voting membership is primarily JCR/MCR representatives, and 20 out of 23 JCRs who considered the topic in their own colleges voted to support OUSU’s stance.

Just last week, OUSU provided JCR presidents with a day of training which received an overwhelmingly positive response and has empowered them to do the best job possible for the students in their colleges. We don’t have an antagonistic relationship with JCRs/MCRs – we work closely together to make sure that we can win for students as members of their colleges, and as members of the wider university.

This week, OUSU has advised JCR presidents on their college rent negotiations and made sure that the university will finally allow students who suspend their study (‘rusticate’) to access libraries and the counselling service. The divide between common rooms and OUSU is an artificial one: we’re all students trying to make this university a better place to study at, and this city a better place to live in.

OUSU was built by students protesting against a university that wasn’t listening to them. They recognised that JCRs and MCRs doing a fantastic job in colleges couldn’t take on the university without a central student union uniting them.

Today, it’s still true that students are stronger when they work together – it’s the only way to make sure that we win an academic environment and student experience that lives up to the university’s world class reputation.

OUSU is all of us – so roll up your sleeves and get involved.

Interview: Norman Finkelstein

0

You can tell everything you need to know about Norman Finkelstein’s incisive, passionate, and articulate manner by reading the brutal censure of President Obama he offers. When I suggested that Obama was handling the Israel-Palestine conflict better than his predecessors, Finkelstein responded, “President Obama is a stupefying narcissist devoid of any principles whatsoever. On the Israel-Palestine conflict, he has been every bit as wretched as his predecessors.” This is a man who spares no blows in defence of his chosen cause.

One of his most famous moments occurred when a student at Waterloo University broke into tears upon meeting him, telling him how deeply offensive his views were to those who died under Nazi rule. Rather than backing down, he told her that he had no sympathy for her “crocodile tears” reminding her that, as much as he hated bringing up the Holocaust, his parents had lived through the concentration camps too, and he “found nothing in their suffering and their martyrdom to justify the torture, the brutalisation, and the demolition of homes.”

He continues his bitter tirade against Obama by telling me what he believes to be the true story behind his election. “When rich financiers who decide these elections had their behind the scenes meetings with the candidates, they thought to themselves, well he has a nice smile, he’s African American, and underneath it, he’s a total cynic. We can work with this guy.”

There is only one major difference, he tells me, between Obama and his predecessor. “Bush, if you study him as a character, actually believed what he was saying. What he was saying was very simple-minded as he had the mentality of a fraternity member: here are the bad guys, here are the good guys, here is the home team, here is the visiting team, we cheer for the home team. He actually believed what he was saying.” On the other hand, “Obama doesn’t believe a word he’s saying, he’s a total cynic and in thrall to power.”

The topic of conversation reverts to the Israel-Palestine conflict. While he is a trenchant critic of Israel, he never hides his scorn for the tactics of those whose actions he thinks are counterproductive to producing a working settlement. He refers to the Campaign for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) as a “hypocritical, dishonest cult.” Finkelstein is remarkably critical of the 1993 Oslo accord, which was the first time Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation recognized each other’s legitimacy, and also started moves towards the peace process. In fact, he tells me, the idea that there is any kind of peace process is simply a way to continue legitimizing Israeli occupation. After signing the agreement, he claims, “Israel had no intention of withdrawing from the occupied territories, it was the opposite. When the First Intifada broke out in 1987 in the occupied territories, it turned into a public relations disaster for Israel, and was a significant drain on their army, because several hundred thousand troops primed to fight wars of aggression were now bogged down in police work, chasing little kids who were throwing stones down the Kasbah. The Israelis reached a conclusion from the First Intifada; they had to normalise and rationalise the occupation, like the British did in India.”

Considering the lack of progress towards resolving the conflict, I ask him if he sees a resolution in future. My attempt to make him put a timescale on peace earns me a witty admonishment. “In 1916, Lenin lamented the fact that he would never see a revolution in Russia. World War One came and shuffled the deck. He was a shrewd political tactician, with a fantastic political eye, yet even he couldn’t see a few years in the future – far be it from me to make these kinds of predictions.

“However, if and when the Palestinians decide to engage again in massive civil resistance to the Israeli occupation instead of being, as they have been in the last few years, passive and quiescent things may change. Then again, I’m not really hopeful, because I don’t think anything short of a massive popular movement will make them [Israel] budge.” 

This leads onto the deeper question of the proper role of non-violence in protest and resistance movements. “In some places, such as during south Lebanon in 1978, I don’t think non-violence would have been effective because no-one cares what happens in south Lebanon, and Israel can continue to get away with its murder and mayhem. In south India, where the government is dispossessing huge populations, I don’t think non-violence is going to work there either, because nobody knows what is going on, and nobody cares, so the army can just go in, commit massive atrocities and it doesn’t raise a single column in a US or British newspaper. The Israel-Palestine conflict is different, it is right in the public eye, it’s in the media’s eye so in the face of a non-violent resistance Israel would have much difficulty using violence to try and suppress it. In Palestine, nonviolence is a viable option, but only because it’s in the public consciousness.”

He asks rhetorically, “Has then the Arab Spring made progress on the Palestine situation more likely?” He also has strong views on this issue. “The Arab Spring and what preceded it in Turkey, that is the emergence of governments which identify ideologically with Palestine, and despite how pragmatic, or, one might say, ridden with corruption these governments are, they won’t tolerate Israel carrying on like a gangster state. When Israel invaded Gaza again in November 2012, they [Palestine] made it very clear to Obama that they have their own red lines, and Israel will not be able to carry on as they did in 2008-9, when there was a protracted massacre in Gaza.”

I ask when the world is full of conflict, what is it about the Israel-Palestine conflict that has consumed his undivided attention. “The only reason that it consumed my entire adult life is because it didn’t end. If it had, I would have gone and invested myself in some other cause or injustice. But I’m not a quitter and I don’t think it’s a moral thing to suddenly get bored with a conflict because it’s no longer trendy or creating headlines.

“You should have the moral backbone to stick with your cause regardless of how popular it is. I owe it to my friends over there in the occupied territories to stick with it until there is resolution.” Whether you admire Finkelstein or see him as some kind of attention-seeking demagogue, you cannot deny that he has one of the strongest moral backbones of any intellectual of our age.

Hollie McNish interview

0

Hollie McNish’s spoken word ranges from issues about immigration to body image obsession. It’s a formula which makes her one of the UK’s most promising new performers. As well as touring the UK and much of Europe, she has released two poetry albums, Touch and Push Kick, and a collection of written poetry, called Papers. But despite her rising stardom, McNish also holds poetry workshops for schools and runs Cambridgeshire’s Youth Poetry Slam for young people between the ages of 12 and 25.

Having only recently entered the spotlight, McNish rejects my label of ‘icon’. “I’ve only been doing it for four years and had two poems go viral, thanks to Upworthy, Reddit and the Huffington Post. If I’m still doing this when I’m 80 then I might take that. But I feel really honoured that so many people are so supportive. It feels a little unreal, to be honest.”

McNish began writing from a young age, much like the young poets she works with in The Youth Poetry Slam, an initiative which encourages young people to write, often for the first time. She traces her creative origins to her childhood. “The first poem I’ve ever found with a date and age on it was age five. But I started writing more when I was about eight or nine. I’ve always written my diaries in rhymes for some reason. The only time I stopped writing was when I was studying at Cambridge. I wrote nothing apart from poems about feeling stuck in a strange bubble.”

But despite writing constantly, her career began to kick off a couple of years ago with support from Battersea Arts Centre. She explains how it happened. “I started seeing what I could do with poetry other than 15 minutes sets at gigs,” she says. “I only just gave up my day job about 4 months ago – I worked for an urban design charity for 4 years, but that, plus the poetry plus motherhood, meant I was getting about four hours sleep, at best, each night.”

Then, McNish’s poetry focussed on everyday issues. Since then her poetry has a political edge. “I did a Masters in Development with Economics and wrote a lot of poems at that point. I prefer reading essays and factual books too so I guess a lot comes from there. When I was at school I refused to watch the news or anything political until I understood what they were talking about (or more the language and words they were using).”

Upon leaving school she had no idea about politics and “didn’t know the
difference between Conservative or Labour, Democrat or Republican, or
anything like that. I just wasn’t interested. But I am now and whenever something affects me or interests me, I write about it in rhyme.”

I ask McNish whether she has a favourite of these poems. “Not really. Most of the poems I’ve written are still under my bed. I only read out a tiny fraction to other people. There are poems I like reading more than others, but I don’t have favourites of my own stuff.”

McNish won the UK Slam Poetry Competition in 2009, and four years on
she was asked to judge the competition. I was interested to see how she felt playing a critical role as a judge. “Horrible, and I’m not good at it! In slams, I give people between 9-10, no lower normally. I don’t really like judging stuff that, in general, has no right or wrong answer. If it was a maths competition I wouldn’t mind. If I remember the poem and it really sticks with me, then that’s what I find important. I’m not really interested in looking deeply at techniques or form, I leave that to judges who know more about poetry.”

Currently the voice behind Dove’s new radio advert, ‘Smile’, I asked McNish how she felt about the campaign. “It feels good now. It took a long time for me to get the balance right and agree to it. I love the campaign but am sceptical about advertising; it was a compromise really. But they have been amazing. I was able to write anything I fancied about self-esteem, there was no input from them. Then if they liked a piece, they could use it.

“Being called ‘the voice’ is funny, because I wrote the piece, I didn’t read someone else’s words. I’m really pleased they went with the poems too as I worked a lot on them, more than on other poems I write. 

“I really wanted to get the focus away from looks, whether good or bad, and onto the things that people actually do.”

She tells me about her plans for the next year. “I’m doing an album of 15 poems, it’ll be a mix of music and plain words. I’m putting all my parenthood diaries into a book (poetry of course) and I’m trying to collect hoards of kids poems that I’ve been writing into something – but that’ll probably have to wait a while!”

McNish’s success so far has built on how prolific she is. But it’s also based on her performance, and desire to share her work with others. This, she says, is the most important thing for an aspiring poet. “Go to open mics. Go to groups. I spent years keeping everything I wrote to myself and walked past poetry cafes for about 2 years, too nervous to go in. I’ve met so many great people since I took the plunge and read out my first poem to others (I mean, other than my mum and boyfriend).”

It’s an approach which has set McNish on a successful career path. With several books and tours lined up, it’s only a matter of time before McNish is seen as one of the most interesting young British poets.

Freddy the Fresher 2014: Part 4

0

The chambers. A royal bed.

 

Enter Freddy

 

FREDDY                 Where am I in this solid tomb of glass?

Is this but where I now must meet my end?

To be alone has long been my life work,

And now I face the depth of all despair.

My chest is full, the venom course, runs dry

Damp sweat clouds mine eyes’ sight and stokes my fear

I would, in life, find less comfort than death.

 

Enter Bernadette

 

BERNADETTE   You alright, Freddy?

You should put some clothes on, I need to get out.

 

FREDDY                 Lovely, more than lovely, if I know it.

Thine eyes are souls distinct from all the earth.

 

BERNADETTE   Yeah, thanks.

Didn’t you say that you had a tute to go to?

 

FREDDY                 Curséd be the Nymph who draws me from sleep,

When my body seeks to rest upon sheets.

 

BERNADETTE   Whatever, I’ve gotta go. See yourself out.

 

[Exit Bernadette]

 

FREDDY                 This wanton misery hath claiméd me.

She is the light that ‘spires my daily work,

Mine micro and mine macro too, she brings

The best of government and rule of law,

And makes mine fingers twitch o’er sweaty keys

As words emerge unspoken in my eyes.

And yet she sees my naked form and frowns,

Does she not see the thing of dreams herein?

I am alone on soiléd sheets awake,

And breathe the sticky post-coital odour.

My flesh is red, my shaft is chaféd raw,

And yet my fear belongs to her depart.

My seed no more shall grace her soft tissue

Nor find its way unwanted to the bin.

Cry! That is my nude lament of days gone by,

From adulterous vices o’er which I raged

Might show mercy still the more potent now.

But weep, for I am in my last descent,

And now must face the knowledge of my death.

Or, if not death, then something really bad,

Like a disease of the cock and the mind.

 

Creaming Spires – 3rd week Hilary

0

Flicking through Ava Gina’s oestrogen-soaked musings, I am perennially disappointed by the passivity of the limp-wristed Lotharios who trot mutely behind her from nightclub to fetid lovenest. When I set out to match Ava’s tales of sloppily haphazard hanky-panky, my mind was cast inexorably back to a testosterone-addled week in Slanchev Bryag, Bulgaria (a resort much like Shagaluf, but without the charm or sophistication). The chants of my schoolmates still ring in my ears: “Lads! Lads! We are the Lads! We are the rigidly-enforced heteronormative stereotypes on tour!”

Slanchev Bryag is populated by musclebound Ukrainian playboys with radioactive permatans, so the pickings were slim for a young man of my affable demeanour and negligible biceps. Moustachioed and heavily-tattooed Bulgarian women sporadically loomed out of the shadows to suggestively offer me a massage, but I resisted their sultry Eastern delights. Instead, persistent canoodling over lurid orange pitchers of methylated spirits won me the romantic attentions of flaxen-haired maiden the shape and consistency of a Bavarian dumpling.

We retired to my opulent suite in Yassen’s Budget Holiday Hostel to make woohoo until the sun rose – or at least, until a voice came floating from the lower recesses of the bed. “Sorry to bother you, mate, but you’re having sex on my ankles.” So I gallantly suggested we retire to the aphrodisiacal surroundings of the communal bathroom. I can only assume that “ja, whatever” is German for “but of course! How splendidly thoughtful of you”, as we soon resumed our continental bonk-fest with aplomb.

“Harder. Harder!” my Bavarian boo demanded with Teutonic efficiency. As a gentleman, I was honour-bound to comply. I grasped at the shower rail to steady myself for a final onslaught on the Southern Front, and was perturbed to feel it come away in my hand. Rail, shower and the surrounding masonry thundered around us as we fell to the ground. My shame-faced Fräulein beat a hasty retreat, followed by a billowing cloud of asbestos and indecipherably foul utterances. I had a wank in the sink and went to bed. 

Letter from…Nice

0

Dear Cherwell,

When reading a letter sent from the Côte d’Azur, you might expect a narrative bejewelled by tales of glamorous encounters. Instead, I’m taking this opportunity to wow you with some public transport anecdotes, a theme which I thought I’d abandoned with the rest of my French GCSE syllabus. My purse, scattered with an obscene amount of used bus and train tickets, forced together and left to swelter, epitomises the lives of many here in Nice: the daily grind – métro, boulot, dodo.

If you speak to the most of the locals here about public transport, the first response you will receive is “il faut faire attention dans les transports en commun, il y a des fous!” (“Be careful on public transport, there are some crazy people.”) But I’ve made several delightful acquaintances on the trams, trains and buses here – from a homeless guy named Mohammed who wanted to practise his English with me, to a 6’8” Sudanese bouncer named Trésor, to a Chinese student on a working holiday and a tall, dark and handsome stranger who offered me his seat and his number (which I ironically lost when clearing out my abundance of used tickets).

Life isn’t all a bed of roses on the number 23, however. There are several aspects which me font chier (really piss me off) The first thing to note is delays. Liberté, Fraternité, Égalité, Delais. The laid back way of life here seems to extend to sticking to timetables and as a result I’ve been left waiting for a train for 2 hours far too many times for my liking. Although, this can be handy when you yourself are running late – being able to reassure yourself that your train will be at least 5 minutes en retard always helps matters. Of course, delays go hand in hand with strikes – which, incidentally, do not mean days off work. Using transport strikes as an excuse would be akin to missing work due to rain in the UK (a more valid reason for absence here in the South of the France, might I add).

Once finally on board, you have another three things to deal with. Firstly, there’s the unconceivable amount of PDA you will witness. There must be something about public transport that really revs French people’s engines. Sitting opposite my 15 year old students snogging and gyrating is always enough to put me off my pain au chocolat.

Secondly, the etiquette of giving up your seat here is painfully awkward. In England, it’s simply a matter of good manners to stand up for your elders. Here, I’ve learnt the hard way that it causes mortal offence for a female to offer her seat to a man, no matter what his age. Now, I always stand.

Thirdly, you have to escape the wrath of the Transport Police. They rarely make an appearance, but when they do they strut down the aisles as if members of the CIA – making everyone flinch as they walk past. It is tempting to stop buying tickets when you are only checked once every blue moon. But the one time you choose not to will almost certainly be the time that the Gallic Dementors decide to sweep into your carriage and inflict their kiss upon you, in the form of €100 fine.

Despite this vent, on the whole, j’aime le transport en commun here in Nice. It is like a best friend; erratic and quirky but it is difficult to stay angry at it for long. It’s a big, mundane part of an otherwise exciting and enriching Year Abroad. It keeps you grounded. Je vous remercie le transport en commun.

Bisous,

Annie 

 

 

Culture Editorial: Artwork Unfolding at a Glacial Pace

0

In a small town named Halberstadt in Central Germany, an empty stone room reverberates with noise. Over the 950 years of its existence, the St Burchardi Church has served variously as monastery, barn, distillery and pigsty, but since 2001 it has played host to a performance of John Cage’s composition ‘Organ²/ASLSP’.

The performance is scheduled to continue for the next 627 years.Cage, the mischievous experimental composer, decreed that the composition should be played ASAP: ‘As Slow As Possible’. The record for the longest performance by single person stands at an entirely respectable14 hours and 56 minutes, but the mechanical organ in St. Buchardi’s Church pushes the work to its limits. The next note change in the current 78-year movement will not sound until 2020.The piece demands that we contemplate the bounds of human endeavour.

There is no upper limit to its longevity except that defined by our technical ingenuity and the transience of our existence. ‘The Clock of the Long Now’ is a similar fusion between the artistic and the mechanical, designed to keep striking for 10,000 years without recourse to digital programming. As well as testing the artifice of its engineers (the $42,000,000 project is still ongoing), it is intended to serve as an “icon for long thinking”.

French undergraduates determinedly chewing their way through the 3000 pages of Proust’s A la recherche du temps perdu will be well aware that its gross length is a result of the author’s endlessly rambling and discursive style rather than a deliberate attempt to challenge the fortitude of his readers. The 17th-century novel Artamène ou le Grand Cyrus is four times as long as Proust’s half-arsed attempt, and the Tibetan Epic of King Gesar stretches ten times longer even than this, running for some 20,000,000 words in its totality. There is a distinction to be drawn between works of art which are long for the sake of being long, and those such as Artamène or the Epic, whose scale is simply a by-product of their complex narratives.

This is largely because written works are not performed or experienced in continuous, unbroken duration in the way that the visual or aural arts are. The world’s longest film, a plotless and deeply disturbing art-house venture which splices heavy metal and clips from pornographic films with a poetry reading over the course of 87 gruelling hours, is notwithout reason entitled A Cure for Insomnia. Theatre is doubly limited by the energy and patience of both audience and actors, and neither of the two performances cited as the longest in the world (The Warp and The Bald Soprano) break the 24-hour mark. Film, installation art and music test our endurance as consumers in a more relentless fashion than books, which are absorbed at the reader’s own pace.

The creators of ‘The Clock of the Long Now’ hope the installation will “do for thinking about time what photographs of Earth from space have done for thinking about the environment”. The steady beating of the mechanical oscillator at the heart of the Clock of the Long Now and the relentless dirge of the organ in the Church of St. Buchardi serve the same purpose: they set the brevity of our lives against the enormity of time.

Cherwell Culture tries…Grand Theft Auto V

0

I put my gun to an innocent bystander’s head. His only crime was to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Kicking and screaming, I drag him down an alleyway to the sound of ricocheting bullets and wailing sirens. With the barely audible thud of a silenced Luger, I silence him forever. Of course, you are not reading “Cherwell Culture tries… Assault and Battery” (though if we run out of ideas later in the term a little violent crime might not go amiss). Rather, I have ventured into the stygian world of Grand Theft Auto V. 

“It’s great,” my friend blithely assures me. “You can torture people and everything, look.” With an innocuous waggle of a joystick his on-screen avatar picks up some unfortunatelooking pliers. A further flutter of fingers over his control pad and some extremely amateurish dental work is suddenly being performed before my eyes. I still have nightmares about the giant pie machine in Chicken Run, so this was frankly all a bit much. “Yeah, great,” I murmur, suppressing my breakfast and eyeing the room for possible exits. “Really tests the bounds of human morality and stuff. Yeah. Really artistic.”

My friend doesn’t hear me – his eyes glaze over as he pounds frantically on the buttons, giving his animated victim a shot of adrenaline to restart his heart so he can continue applying animated electrodes to his animated nipples. “Definitely really artistic,” I repeat to myself. To give the game’s producers their credit, it’s a gorgeously-produced artwork, animated nipples and all. When I take the control padand clumsily roam the fictional city of Los Santos, I can recognise the freedom bestowed and the breathtaking scope of the game. My only point of reference is Snake on my trusty Nokia 5110. It seems things have moved on a bit in the computer world since then.

One thing that has not changed since those days of merrily charging around a green-lit screen is the portly girth of my pudgy fingers. I mash wildly at my control pad, while my friend provides calm and lucid direction. “Left! Not your left, my left! No, other left! Don’t let him – OK, well, get the – put down the – Jesus. Pick up the thing. Not the thing, the thing! The thing. I said the thing.” “Shut up,” I retort wittily. Despite my best efforts, my character blunders around with the grace of a potato. If there is a car, Iwill crash it. If there is a wall, I will run into it. If I am sitting quietly an empty room with padded walls and no exits, my head will explode for no apparent reason.

My friend’s continuous refrain is “I don’t even know how you did that”, as I find a myriad unexpected ways to blow my own brains out. By the end, I am prodding at the control pad with my eyes shut, whimpering as my friend sighs reproachfully beside me. “I did say to pick up the thing”. I’d rather hook up my real nipples to an A/C generator than spend another gory and chaotic hour running roundin circles and inadvertently shooting myself in the ear.

Review: Simon Jay

0

On arriving at the Old Fire Station last Saturday I had no idea what I had come to see. A one man show, purporting to be comedy. Does that mean stand-up comedy? Sketches? Part of the problem with this show, written by Scott Payne and performed by Jay, is that it didn’t seem to know what it was either. Sure there were elements of humour – I think it extracted a least three chuckles from me; not nearly approaching guffaw or rumbling, inexorable belly-laugh territory but nevertheless mildly amusing. These attempts at comedy drowned in a sea of half-baked allusions to more serious theatrical genres or forms.

The premise of the performance was to trace a man’s life through his interactions with other people. The man in question was actually a jacket placed over the back of a chair, with a claw-like plastic hand protruding from one sleeve. The narrative arc, such as it was, was provided by a motley cast of characters rendered by Simon Jay, who lithely skipped between genders, ages, and regional accents, verging on the hysterical.

Despite their skilful portrayals many of these characters were lazy caricatures, from the drunken cockney football fan to the airy-fairy, spiritually attuned hack hypnotherapist Dr Strepsils. If comedy means reciting tired stereotypes for a cheap laugh then this, unfortunately, was comedy of the highest order. When the joke wasn’t about the characters themselves, all we were left with was toilet humour, the bulk of which took place in a sewer works. I’ll leave it up to you to guess what that involved.

The main trouble I had with this piece was not the immature, pedestrian attempts at humour; it was their juxtaposition with dark plot twists and tragic notes which could not be reconciled with jokes about poo. When looked at objectively there is little to laugh about in the subject’s life. His sister dies in the blitz; his mother is a prison-bound drug addict who hates him; he fails to turn up to his own wedding because he’s in bed with another woman; his wife deals with this for 39 years before divorcing him; he works in a sewer; and eventually he dies of a heart attack. In a show lasting under an hour, there was no time to marry a depressing biography with humorous asides, and on the basis of this performance it is not something to be attempted again.  

Review: Tartuffe

0

Tartuffe is both one of Moliere’s most famous and most controversial comedies. Following the story of a young sinner, Tartuffe, who has been taken in by an infatuated patriarch named Orgon, the plays’ treatment of contentious issues such as religious hypocrisy led to its being censored. However, audiences both now and then delighted in the hilarity of the farcical characters and satirical narrative.

This cast have clearly made the script their own, with the addition of hilarious interjections and witticisms to the dialogue; recurring jokes such as the persistent mispronunciation of “Tartuffe”, and the “rough translation” of English phrases spoken with French accents, for instance, really added a fresh lick of paint to a well-known classical story. 

The characters themselves were strong, and the actors should be commended for creating such memorable onstage personalities. Particularly notable, in my opinion, was Bria Thomas in the role of the outspoken servant girl Dorine, whose clever asides and pithy remarks were remarkably engaging. Tommy Siman brought many contrasting colours to the character of Tarfuffe; his alternation between the sweet, pious holy man and the dark, saucy sinner was both comedic and ironic, as the audience got a chance to glimpse the villainous man behind the facade. I also thought that Melita Cameron-Wood did a fantastic job of interpreting the role of Madame Pernelle, at once a cynical, painfully truthful old hag and a foolishly enamoured advocate of Tartuffe. 

The comedy was by no means overdone, however. Co-directors Ben Nicholson and Fay Lomas still succeeded in representing the central themes of the play; false virtue and the deceitful manipulation of doctrine for sinful personal gain. Both Siman and Joshua Wilce, who plays the master-of-the-house Orgon, both collaborated fabulously together on stage to create buckets of irony, simultaneously infuriating and comic. A nice touch during the scenes where Tartuffe seduces Orgon’s wife Elmire (Alma Prelec), was that the stage was bathed in an ominous red light. This really drew the audience’s attention to the sin unfolding onstage.

The performance certainly succeeded in doing what it set out to do; creating an entertaining piece with a laugh a minute, whilst at the same time leaving us to contemplate the darker side of religion and human nature.

Tartuffe is showing 4th – 9th of February at the Corpus Christi Auditorium.