Sunday 8th June 2025
Blog Page 1423

Review: Frozen

0

★★★★☆

Four Stars

I watched Frozen on a hot summer’s evening with my 18 year old sister and, at 20 years old, I would happily do it again. I was initially resistant – I couldn’t bear the thought of 90 minutes watching bubble-gum flavoured Disney princess crap. But what I expected turned out to be exactly what this movie is consciously rejecting and critiquing. The most important relationship in Frozen is not between a blonde bimbo and some guy she’s just met who has a crown and claims to be charming; it’s between two sisters. Two sisters who are really cool. Frozen, as it were.

When I was at the age of watching Disney movies, my two personal favourites were Mulan and Pocahontas. They seemed the coolest to me, and in retrospect that’s probably because they involve the most proactive Disney females in an industry of very passive princesses. They take matters into their own hands, and boy do they get shit done – Mulan saves all of China!

The two heroines of Frozen are similarly badass. Anna doesn’t send her prince on a rescue mission for her sister – she goes herself. When she needs “an act of true love” to save her from death, she doesn’t mope around – she goes herself to find one. Elsa builds an extremely cool palace, creates two ice beings, and ultimately overcomes what appears to be a form of anxiety or depression and rules in peace. They’re great models for me, and they’re undoubtedly great role models for young girls. (Certainly, it beats any of the women in The Hobbit. Oh wait – there’s only one! One woman who is shoe-horned into the work for the sake of romance. Great!)

Apart from finally having some cool female role models for the 21st century, it’s also just a good movie. Unlike Brave it actually has a plot, rather than being an excuse to throw around a “feisty female” who has an entire CGI programme made for her hair. For example, a mainstay of any Disney movie is the songs – and the songs in this are great. There’s already a proliferation of YouTube clips showing adorable children singing the songs, and you absolutely need to add them to your Disney sing-along playlist. (Everybody has one. Don’t lie.) The little Sis and I were singing “Do you want to build a snowman?” for a week after we watched it. It is easily the best Disney song I’ve heard in the last 10 years.

Another thing you might consider is how beautiful the animation is. The wintry landscape is gorgeous, an on-screen representation of a snowy life which makes one feel like the cool breeze is emerging from the screen and settling onto your body. I’ve even been told that they created an entirely new CGI algorithm for the snow!

You should watch Frozen. Whether you are male or female, young or old, watching it in winter or summer, you absolutely need to watch it. Mainly so I have someone to sing “Do you want to build a snowman?” with. 

Frozen is in cinemas now

Port Meadow saga continues following inquiry

0

An inquiry into the controversial Oxford University graduate blocks at Port Meadow has found that both the consultation procedures and the University’s initial application were inadequate.

Although clearing Oxford County Council of previous suspicions of malpractice, the review held both the University and the Council accountable for a series of errors in the application, planning and consultation process.

The £21.5m Castle Mill development at Port Meadow has been widely criticised since its conception in 2012. According to the Save Port Meadow Campaign, “The buildings vandalise the views of the Dreaming Spires and ruin the tranquil experience of Port Meadow”. Author and Oxford resident Phillip Pullman has denounced the structures as, “destructive, brutal, ugly vandalism”.

The independent inquiry, carried out by Vincent Goodstadt, a former President of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI), looked into the planning process which led to the development. It concluded that, although not deliberate, “the consultative processes on the [development] were not adequate for a combination of reasons and did not meet best practice.

According to the review, one of the primary problems was that: “Some of those most affected were not involved or even aware of the application or processes”. Factors contributing to this included the failure of the University’s consultants to “invite those whom the applicant thought had been invited”, and to put the site notices “in places that were high profile for those who later were to raise objections”.

The University was also criticised for its initial application, which Mr Goodstadt said “contained errors and was not adequate in various ways”.

A University spokesperson commented, “We will look carefully at the recommendations in this report”.

Save Port Meadow and CPRE Oxfordshire released a joint statement expressing their views on the conclusions of the report, “The report of the Review into the Castle Mill development is enormously disappointing, failing to address key issues and missing an important opportunity to improve planning in Oxford.

“We stand by our view that there is significant evidence of breaches in statutory regulation and possible malpractice.”

Nicky Moeran, a member of the Save Port Meadow group, commended the report. He said, “The heart of the document contains some very damning findings for both the city council and the university, which all tie in with what we have said repeatedly over the last 12 months.

Matthew Sherrington, another member, told Cherwell, “The University did indeed make misleading statements in its application, but the Council failed to check them, failed to consult the community properly, failed to inform Councillors properly, failed to assess the visual impact of the development properly, and failed to act against the University when it breached planning conditions on two separate occasions.

 “Throughout, the University has shown complete arrogance and disregard for the community, refusing to engage at all, or respond to any correspondence. They have done immense damage to relations with the town and their own reputation in this matter.”

One graduate student at the University noted, “The fact that they had to go so undercover to pass these plans through the consultation process shows how unpopular they knew they would be.

“If the council unwittingly accepted them because they thought the buildings would not be as tall, the University need to pay up to rectify the situation.

However, Engineer student Ben Spiro pointed out, “As ugly as the buildings are, it doesn’t really make that much difference pointing the finger now– there’s not much we can actually do since the buildings are already there.”

Review: Mandela: Long Walk To Freedom

0

★★★★★

I cannot stand an audience who applaud the screen as the credits roll. However, a screening of Justin Chadwick’s glorious biopic Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom proved that occasionally, some films can warrant such reactions.

Based on the autobiography of Nelson Mandela, Mandela catalogues the life of the iconic figure from childhood to presidency with no moment of incomprehensible emotional and physical torment left unconsidered. However, against this struggle the pervading message of Mandela’s resilience and stoic commitment to fairness leaves an aftertaste that is utterly uplifting.

In a season of serious heavyweights for black male leads, Idris Elba, best known as Russell “Stringer” Bell in The Wire and for his leading role in the BBC’s Luther, proves a commanding Mandela who towers over even Morgan Freeman’s iconic interpretation of the South African president in 2009’s Invictus. The true-story narrative is captivating, lubricated by Elba’s wholly believable portrayal, from the gradual aging stoop he develops as the film progresses, to his uncanny imitation of Mandela’s soft, gravelly tones. He is effortless in his transition from cheeky, womanising barrister, to fugitive, to the age-wearied, post-Robben Island Mandela we have come to recognise, maintaining the revolutionary’s steely backbone throughout.

Naomie Harris as Mandela’s second wife, Winnie, is equally enchanting. After Mandela’s release, Harris needs only one devastating look to capture the grief that Winnie feels for the loss of her relationship with Mandela. Harris embodies a woman stuck in a predicament; oozing unhappiness but also total commitment, as if 27 years in waiting have created an indelible bond that ties her irrevocably to her husband.

Visually, Mandela is stunning. Although the golden hues of Mandela’s childhood kraal are inaccurate and rather far from the images of the unspectacular landscape we saw in the recent coverage of Mandela’s funeral, Chadwick should be allowed some cinematic sentimentalism in a film that could otherwise be overwhelmed by the grey of Robben Island and the harsh cacophony of gunfire that permeates the narrative. The running time is long at 146 minutes, but that must not be an excuse to wait until DVD release. This film yearns to be on the big screen, both for the astounding panoramic shots of the South African landscape and close-ups of the subtle expressions in the prosthetic wrinkles of Elba’s ageing face. Although, regrettably the prosthetics aren’t quite there yet; on occasion Elba’s puffy, waxy face feels more Bo Selecta than Madiba.

The film’s limitations come largely from the limits of the form. It is without doubt too great a feat for one feature-length film to do justice to the multiplicity of personas that Mandela adopted throughout his life, nor the many significant milestones accounted for in the 784 page autobiography. Nonetheless, the films succeeds both as an education in the struggles of segregated South Africa and as a testament to Mandela’s personal sacrifice and unwavering spirit. Amongst others, Chadwick’s greatest success lies with his portrayals of atrocities such as the 1960 massacre in Sharpeville, recreating violence that is deeply harrowing but never sensationalised.

Chadwick also seeks to remind us that Mandela was no saint, humanising him through dramatizing moments of adultery and abusive behaviour to his first wife. The result is a more tangible Mandela, as we see that the successes of his political life weigh intolerably onto his private. Despite the constant trials, the clenched fist of determination presides as a dominating symbol; one of resilience and empowerment. Yet it is when Mandela chooses to relax his clenched fist into a new movement of forgiveness, but Winnie keeps hers firm, that the true division in the partnership is revealed and the audience understands that their differences are irreconcilable. Elba and Harris capture this effortlessly, carrying the film with commanding performances that are sure to be defining moments of their careers.

For spectacular landscapes, performances of a lifetime and a crash course in the human cost of Mandela’s struggle against apartheid, Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom is an unmissable epic. Go and see it, before you know it this “long” walk to freedom will have flown by, and you might just find yourself on your feet like me, cheering with the rest of them.

Mandela: Long Walk To Freedom is in cinemas now

MT13: a fresher reflects

0

As much as I subscribe to the sluggish behaviour excusable at Christmas; eating my weight in mince pies and being serenaded by Michael Buble’s satin-smooth voice from the comfort of my living room, I am missing the buzz of students on High Street following a lecture.

Looking back over my first eight weeks of Oxford life, the only big hiccup was Freshers’ week, which didn’t rise to the myth of being the “week of my life”. I have since gladly scratched its events out of my mental scrapbook, it being 0th week anyway. Starting out, I had the anxieties of any normal fresher: What if I can’t cope with the workload? How long can I get away with a dilettantish interest in wine and classical music before being caught out? But once this transitional stage had been passed, and the term finally kicked in, I was quickly sucked in by this world of formal hall and boozy bops. I no longer find the incestuous notion of college families strange – unlike my friends and actual family, who are still mystified.

From the moment we had dropped our suitcases and tearily waved Mum and Dad goodbye, we were whisked away by a whirlpool of endless induction talks, library tours and alcohol-infused ice breakers, where faces and conversation all merged into one. I found myself neck-deep in a stream of emails inviting me to societies I couldn’t remember signing up for at the Freshers’ Fair, having been lured by all the free stationary and other miscellaneous swag. Yet once there, intoxicated by the air of giddy first-term excitement, I was persuaded that I had yearning to try clay-pigeon shooting, convinced that I’d be socially disadvantaged if I didn’t sign up for any college sport.

Although the themed nights out during Freshers’ were fun to begin with, by Friday the constant shoving on the dance floor was getting as tedious as the cyclic cheese playlist. The best part of nights out was the trip to Hassan’s afterwards; my first Hassan’s, in its sacred, golden box, was consumed in the presence of a swarm of second and third-year regulars – it felt like an initiation ceremony.

When balancing the consecutive nights of drinking with the tute sheet or reading list, it was easy to feel that Oxford was a bad choice. Wanting to please, and fearing that a half-arsed essay and gnomic assertions in my first tutorial would be ripped to shreds like a vulture at a carcass, I was determined to knuckle down and work hard – undoubtedly helped by the lingering fear of being breathalysed in my first tute, which I had been told by a third year (whilst queuing for the loos in Park End) was standard procedure. I even braved the maze of the Bodleian for a book- only to find out, after plugging a billion permutations into SOLO that I was trying to locate an article from an e-journal. Going into the Rad Cam the next day to look for another book, I found myself in the Gladstone link – the rolling stacks caving in on me was a pretty apt metaphor for how I’d been feeling that week.

Yet by mid-term, having finally reached the light at the end of the Gladstone link tunnel, and becoming familiar with Oxford customs, I no longer felt like a tiny “Borrower” lost in the scary world of “human beans”. I remember how at the start, the mention of “crew dates” had been enough to send shivers up my spine, triggering visions of sconces without boundaries and being forced to drink wine and curry concoctions. My experience of an actual crew date, however, was a tempered version of this image, and was a fun way of meeting people outside of the college bubble.

I had also somehow dodged the notorious, triannual ‘fifth week blues’ virus, basking in the bliss of my reading week (which I have been told since are very rare handouts- thanks tutor!). Instead, I used the opportunity to invite a couple of friends up to visit. On seeing the grandiose colleges, both oohed and awed, before eventually asking, “So where’s the actual university?”

Attending the RAG ball was one of the term’s highlights, which, contrary to my expectation of ostentatiousness, provided seven hours of unadulterated fun, and the chance to regress to infancy – crawling like fancily dressed, overgrown toddlers in RAG’s giant hamster balls.

Charting the ebb and flow of first term, I’ve realised that it’s a kaleidoscope of emotions. Some weeks, when you’re having a major essay crisis and suffering from FOMO after seeing your pals’ pics online, you wish you’d gone to Bristol instead. What I learnt from my first term is that the concept of free time ceases to exist, so you may as well stop worrying: that takes up time too. Sleep will get replaced with copious amounts of coffee, but it’s fine – just remember how long the Christmas holidays are. Oh, and to pack less – if there’s no time to sleep there will definitely not be time to read Tolstoy “for pleasure”.

Top 20 Albums of 2013

0

In case you missed it, our top tracks from last year were announced on Christmas eve. 2013 also saw the release of an array of brilliant debut albums and career climaxing records from a wide range of genres. Here are twenty favourites. 

20. II – Unknown Mortal Orchestra

19. Cold Spring Fault Less Youth – Mount Kimbie 

18. …Like Clockwork – QOTSA

17. Jai Paul – Jai Paul

16. The Child of Lov – The Child of Lov 

15. Light Up Gold – Parquet Courts: Loud, guitary, and simultaneously sarcastic and nostalgic.

14. Howlin – Jagwar Ma: Fuzzy psychedelia mixed with bubbly dance. 

13. Paracosm – Washed Out: The chill wave heavyweight evolves to a more subtle and textured wall-of-sound.

12. Factory Floor – Factory Floor: New New Order with added malice under the surface.

11. Love’s Crushing Diamond – Mutual Benefit: Economical, ephemeral, and crushingly sad.

10. 6 Feet Beneath the Moon – King Krule

Only tenth because I’m getting embarrassed about how much I talk about it

9. The New Life – Girls Names

In The New Life the Belfast four piece reinvent their sound: more brooding and restrained, vocals and guitars drip with reverb, and gloomy synths give a distinctly 80s feel. 

8. Immunity – Jon Hopkins

The expertly paced progression of the album follows that of a night: glitchy excitement teeters over into anxiety, the album peaks with crunching and aggressive techno, and the final washed out piano-ambient songs are the melodic equivalent of a sunrise.

7. Cabinet of Curiosities – Jacco Gardner

An eerie and ornate baroque pop album that could be a series of children’s stories: in turns charming and sinister, the diverse soundscape is as atmospheric as it is beautiful. The young Dutchman played all the instruments in the lush orchestration and produced the album as well, coating it with late 60s reverb.

6. Drone LogicDaniel Avery

Acidic techno at times reminiscent of the early Chemical Brothers, this is a far cry from the garage-influenced minimalism dominating the current club scene – which is perhaps why it’s so refreshing. The Fabric veteran’s groovy, thrumming riffs are hard to resist.

5. Silence Yourself – Savages

Bracing, darkly energetic music that somehow manages to sound like it is being sung – or howled – in the same caps lock as their online manifesto. Simply post-punk karaoke? Far from it: Savages manage to be a product of their influences without being a pastiche. Glorying in their own intellect, their lyrics deal with art and sexuality. 

4. Cupid Deluxe – Blood Orange

Dev Hynes takes a break from production to develop his solo career. This is fluid and mournful stuff, 21st-century R&B with the emphasis on blues over rhythm, with smooth synths and gently throbbing drums interlaced with androgynous vocals.

3. Pale Green Ghosts – John Grant

Grant combines singer-songwriter and synth pop, his intensely personal lyrics dealing with the heartbreak, homophobia, and HIV he suffered – but still managing to be blackly humorous. The imagery is relentlessly inventive: depression is like ‘a cold, concrete room with fluorescent lighting…which, as you know, makes everything look bad´; and the pale green ghosts of the title are both the road-side trees on a solitary drive and reminders of his past.

2. Psychic – Darkside

Nicolas Jaar joins guitarist Dave Harrington for an uncomfortable but masterful melding of genres: influences range from krautrock to blues. The atmosphere is dimly lit and otherworldly, schizophrenic in its fluctuating BPM and sudden sustained silences – Psychic sounds like Eraserhead looks. The distant vocals and spectral guitar only add to the effect. Darkside weaves an intricate sonic tapestry worth exploring at length. 

1. Wakin On A Pretty Daze – Kurt Vile

‘Making music is easy, watch me’. Everything about Wakin On A Pretty Daze seems effortless. It is laziness elevated to an art form: the mumbled lyrics are contemplative and introspective, dealing with the touring life. The overgrown songs sprawl over 9 minutes. This is Kurt’s conversation with himself – and as such he can be as idle as he likes. But all this apparent effortlessness hides a complex and painstakingly created sound. It’s a testament to Kurt’s talent that his tangled guitar picking still feels spacious and improvised, as do his wittily tangential lyrics. Wakin On A Pretty Daze feels as hazy and sun-drenched as its artwork. If you have an afternoon with as little to do as Kurt Vile, spend it listening to this.

 

and…

Biggest disappointment: Daft Punk – Random Access Memories

Self-indulgent, lazy and Disneyfied – the comparisons with Andrew Lloyd Webber were entirely justified. ‘Alive’ it is not.

 

Turing’s pardon was not the right solution

Alan Turing, the famous Second World War codebreaker, mathematician and computer scientist was convicted of ‘gross indecency’ under a law which criminalised homosexual acts in 1952, one of at least 50,000 men prosecuted under this law. The conviction caused him to lose security clearance for intelligence work and also forced him, after he rejected imprisonment, to undergo chemical castration. He was found dead two years later. Suicide by cyanide poisoning was judged to be the cause of death, which some dispute. Last week the government announced a royal pardon for Alan Turing, 61 years after his prosecution. Though I don’t doubt many of the petitions and individuals calling for the pardon were well-intentioned, I think this is profoundly wrong.

Legally, the pardon is not in keeping with the usual procedure, as the government’s press release acknowledges: “A pardon is only normally granted when the person is innocent of the offence and where a request has been made by someone with a vested interest such as a family member”. It goes on to say “uniquely on this occasion a pardon has been issued without either requirement being met, reflecting the exceptional nature of Alan Turing’s achievements”. It is this statement which highlights the underlying attitude of the pardon to Turing’s conviction and the history of the criminalisation of homosexuality; it is based on a justification of Turing’s exception talents and achievements, rather than on the appalling injustice of the legal system.

Indeed, the whole press release is adorned with references to Turing by Cameron and Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, as an “exceptional man”, with hardly any attempt to address the issue of the history of persecution. Thus the suffering of Turing himself, and the thousands of other victims of the oppressive law, not to mention the culture of fear and intolerance it helped create and sustain, have not been given due consideration.

Though it may seem cynical to identify the pardon with the pragmatism, self-promotion and patriotism of the government, their statements on the matter seem to be indicative of it. Cameron chose to emphasise Turing’s “key role in saving this country in World War 2” and his “remarkable national legacy through his substantial scientific achievements” rather than any moral sentiment about his prosecution. Through this rhetoric he is reclaimed as a national war hero of a nation whose representatives treated him like dirt; a figure whose achievements ensure that Britain should remember him with pride, rather than with shame at the way he was treated.

If anyone should be pardoned, then all should be pardoned. Turing’s conviction and treatment was not reprehensible because of his outstanding talents but because of its disgusting discrimination against men based simply on the gender of their sexual partners and the devastating impact it had on his life and the lives of so many others as a result. An individual pardon denies this important truth, and is empty unless it applies to everyone convicted.

Having said that, I don’t believe a royal pardon is the best way to approach the history of criminalised homosexuality. The language of ‘pardon’ still implies a need for forgiveness, and the power of the government to give it, and implies a crime on the side of the prosecuted rather than the persecutor. It offers a polite gesture in the face of a cruel injustice.  The government press release repeatedly mentioned an attempt to help ‘clear the name’ of Turing, as if it was in their power or right to do so. Surely we should recognise that in the minds of all of those of us who believe in gay equality, Turing’s name was always crystal clear, and the government that now proclaims to clear it with a noble gesture was in fact the party in need of forgiveness. The power of the government to define sexualities and discipline them was what made this law a disaster, and the pardon in some small way just reflects this tendency.

 A full and open understanding of the cruelty and persecution of the past should motivate and inform us to strive for social change, rather than be glossed over. I’m sticking a metaphorical two-fingers up to a government which seems to want a good news day so they can bask in the glory of a war hero, whom they can claim credit for ‘pardoning’, sweeping the oppression of him and many others under the rug and not doing enough to tackle LGBTQ discrimination in the present. Words and the way we view history mean so much, but for me, these are the wrong ones and they shouldn’t distract us from the fact that more of Cameron’s party voted against equal marriage than for it, or that UK government is still deporting LGBTQ asylum seekers facing similar discrimination and worse abroad back to their home countries where they are likely to face severe persecution. If we really want to do something positive for LGBTQ liberation, it should be about changing the future, not revising the past.

Oxonians scoop seven New Year Honours

0

Six Oxford academics and the Ruskin College chairman have been named amongst the New Year’s Honours for 2014.

The six awards won by academics at Oxford University amounted to more than any other university this year, with Edinburgh in second place, having won five. Cambridge University staff won three. A total of fifty-nine honours were won by university staff and academics nationally. Most notably, Dr Noel Malcolm, a fellow at All Souls, and Professor Peter Radcliffe of Nuffield College have been knighted.

Additionally, women claimed four of the six honours won by Oxford staff, matching the national trend as, for the first time, women have claimed more than half of the 1195 honours awarded.

Two Knights Bachelors, a DBE, CBE, OBE, and MBE were awarded to University staff. An additional MBE was awarded to the chair of the governing executive of Ruskin College (an adult education institution affiliated with the University). The honours are listed below in order of seniority.

Knights Bachelor

Dr Noel Malcolm, Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College, and Fellow of the British Academy, for services to scholarship, journalism, and European history.

Professor Peter J Radcliffe at the Nuffield Department of Medicine for services to clinical medicine.

DBE (Dame Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire)

Professor Frances Kirwan, Billmeir-Septcentenary Fellow at Balliol College and Fellow of the Royal Society, for services to mathematics.

CBE (Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire)

Professor Marian Dawkins, Fellow and Tutor in Biological Sciences at Somerville College, for services to animal welfare.

OBE (Officer of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire)

Ceridwen Roberts, Senior Research Fellow at the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, for services to the social sciences.

MBE (Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire)

Karen Hewitt, Tutor at the Department of Continuing Education, for services to building academic and cultural understanding between the UK and Russia.

David Norman, chair of governing executive at Ruskin College, for services to adult education.

Review: Call The Midwife Christmas Special

0

“You belong to nobody but yourself and you know exactly where you are going.” Thus ended the Call the Midwife Christmas Special, with Sister Julienne’s (Jenny Agutter) words to the Shelagh, the former Sister Bernadette (Laura Main), on her wedding day; on a definite note of self-possession and certainty, which accurately encompasses the tone of Heidi Thomas’ latest episode.

For a period drama which engages with the social issues rather than leaving its own life in the hands of its costume department and cinematographers, Call the Midwife does not shirk away from exploring the personal. While the customary medical issues continue to assert themselves in the latest episode; a polio epidemic threatens the inhabitants of Poplar, along with the brace pre-requisite childbirths the episode is also shaped by what on the surface seems to be an unusual subject for Heidi Thomas. The untimely discovery of an unexploded German bomb in the middle of the area is somewhat unexpected, but adds to the drama of the episode by exploring previously uncharted territory and show that Heidi Thomas is a long way from exhausted of material as well as examining the series’ common theme of the effect of the Second World War on Britain in a fresh way.

As well as the events which shape the wider community, the episode also brought new light to bear on the show’s regular characters. Sister Evangelina’s (Pam Ferris) worldly wisdom was shown in further light as her profound expertise on the disastrous effect of dolly mixtures were made known to all and Sister Monica Joan’s (Judy Parfitt) impromptu recitations of Victorian poetry take an unexpected turn for the Gothic. Apart from this, though, there are significant developments in the portrayal of the characters: the beginning of the episode sees Chummy (Miranda Hart) happily settling into her role as a new mother, far from the days when she capsized her bicycle every five minutes and accidentally assaulted policemen. The tension brought about by the presence of the bomb and subsequent evacuation throw a surprising light on one of the younger nurses, Trixie (Helen George), who acts with a competence and an enduring heroism, the extent of which is rarely seen among the younger nurses on the show, and manages to help a shell-shocked man particularly effected by the trauma of the situation.

Following the example of the previous two series, the third of which is scheduled to begin mid-January, the episode continues in a vein of clear feminine competence and co-operation. Reversing what may be called the normative male:female ratio, the cast of Call the Midwife stands out as offering an obvious voice for a new look at the lives of women. Apart from it being wildly refreshing to watch something that does not endorse the objectification or trivialisation of women, the show is engaging from the point of view of portraying feminine relationships that are supportive rather than competitive and on a level that allows emotion a rare precedence over appearance.

The episode closed with the eagerly anticipated wedding of the series favourites Shelagh and the local G.P., Dr. Turner (Stephen McGann). Having postponed and somewhat re-thought their original simple and muted wedding, the pair finally marry under the contented gaze of their friends. Avoiding what could have potentially been a sappy close to the episode, the episode ends with the subtle note of hope and affection that has been driving through the previous hour and a quarter. 

Call The Midwife is currently available to stream on BBC iPlayer

Review: The Secret Life of Walter Mitty

0

★★★★☆

Four Stars

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (starring and directed by comedian Ben Stiller) follows an inconspicuous middle-aged white collar worker in New York City who suffers from intense daydreams, and in a warming journey of self-discovery, finally manages to realise them.

Peter Bradshaw (film critic for The Guardian) didn’t fail to note the directing and acting credits claimed by Ben Stiller, in his opinion constituting a ‘narcissistic’ adaptation. Indeed, we are subject to many an extended shot of Ben Stiller’s face. Having said this, Stiller’s transition from such directly comedic (and arguably momentous) roles in Meet The Parents, Starsky and Hutch and Zoolander, has been surprisingly seamless. Despite considerable doubt, Stiller has produced a thoroughly convincing ‘everyman’ role which does not deserve to be criticised.

Kristen Wiig, who plays Walter’s love interest Cheryl, is cast equally successfully and adds an honest charm to the film which thankfully avoids the ‘sickly sweet’ trap common to the happy-go-lucky rom-com girl.It is partially due to this acting that The Secret Life earns such success in the realm of sentimentality: we accompany socially awkward Walter every step of the way as he matures clumsily from wallflower to winner. We laugh with him, not at him, and are satisfied when his efforts are rightly rewarded in the final scene.

Despite this success, one critic’s proclamation that the film was the new Forrest Gump is uninformed. Yes, Walter Mitty is a story of the underdog – one which doubles as a romantic comedy and warms the cockles. Regrettably however The Secret Life is neither a classic nor an epic. While we experience notable pathos, it is not quite enough to stir any tears, to leave us empty or even reflective upon leaving the cinema. Mitty’s story, despite his wild travels, is relatively insular; Gump’s manages to be relevant to the majority of North America. While similarities are apparent in sentiment and inspirational content, Walter Mitty will struggle to achieve half as much critical acclaim as Zemeckis’ masterpiece.

Apart from this, the film does triumph on the back of Stuart Dryburgh’s stunning photography. Walter’s adventures to Greenland, Iceland, the Himalayas and Afghanistan provide enough high contrast, high resolution scenes for us to be able to watch the entire film on mute. These epic, worldly shots, interspersed with banal scenes set in a concrete New York, do well to emphasise the grey life in which Walter lives, and the seemingly unattainable life of which he first dreams.

What can be aptly criticised however is the extent to which these bursts of colour and light affect the plot, rendering the film rather unrealistic and implausible. Walter, upon having a mental epiphany, leaves work unnoticed in the middle of the day, flies to Greenland immediately with no luggage and, from this day forward, becomes a new man. No strings attached. Just like that.

If we can overlook such trivialities though, the film undoubtedly constitutes a success: it’s a warm fusion of traditional feel-good cinema with an inspirational message to ‘stop dreaming and start living’, panoramic shots of mountains, and Ben Stiller’s face.

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty is in cinemas now

 

Don’t wish me a Happy New Year

0

Ring out, wild bells, to the wild sky,

The flying cloud, the frosty light:

The year is dying in the night;

Ring out, wild bells, and let him die.

Here we are again. It’s New Year’s Eve; that one night in the year where boredom and sadness are magically abolished, when ‘fun’ is enforced in parties across the world with a quasi-totalitarian insistence. Anyone who doesn’t have the time of their life on New Year’s Eve – or at least does not pretend to – is a bore, a heretic, an apostate, refusing to partake in the mythology of the New Year. 

Because it is, at the end of the day, a myth. An opportunity to celebrate something abstract, ungraspable by most, while not quite knowing why; a chance to spend time with people you don’t really want to see, but act merry and drink heavily. New Year’s Eve is the ultimate saturnalia, a mindless reverie with little purpose or aim. 

Even the logistics leave much to be desired; most New Year’s Eve parties are a chance to get excessively drunk at three times the price of an average night out, filled with people claiming to be having “a fucking great time” – parties which never fail to disappoint. Unsurprisingly, given that the bar of enjoyment for New Year’s Eve is set so unrealistically high. 

As you can probably tell, I’ve never really enjoyed New Year’s Eve celebrations. All of a sudden, we are showered with end-of-year lists, vainglorious Facebook statuses which sum up people’s achievements over the last year, lists of flatulent predictions for the one to come and, worst of all, conceited New Year’s Resolutions which either won’t materialise or are of little interest to most of us. Do people really expect to change their lives and those of others through some kind of millenarian inspiration caused by the arbitrary machinations of the Gregorian calendar or the position of the earth with relation to the Sun. I personally prefer the Alexandrian calendar, which started the year on the 29th of August. With Christmas so close, surely we could spread out our celebrations a little?

Soon, the text messages from people you have hardly ever spoken to, the Snapchats, the Facebook statuses and broadcast Whatsapps will begin to pour forth with a brimming enthusiasm which is quite frankly astounding. New Year’s Eve encourages a vain sense of hope and joy, an unrealistic expectation which can only disappoint. It’s an excuse to be happy about something which is of little more consequence than the passing of another day. What, essentially, are we really celebrating, but the passage of time? It is a fallacy based on unrealistic hopes; it doesn’t matter how shit our lives might really be, for this one day every year we can pretend otherwise.  

Don’t get me wrong – any other time of the year I am the first to enjoy a bit of fun. In fact, if people applied the same hope, enjoyment and positivity of New Year’s Eve the whole year round, the world might be a much better place. What I have issue with is the superficiality of New Year’s Eve. It doesn’t really matter whether you’re having fun or not as long as everyone knows you are. Surely it is too much to ask that everyone’s good mood should miraculously coincide on a single day every year.

In my hometown, Madrid, an increasing amount of people congregate in the traditional Puerta del Sol to welcome the New Year a day early – on the night of the 30th rather than the 31st. I cannot stress enough what a great idea this is; a chance to get whole palaver out of the way, becoming just as drunk as on ‘proper’ New Year’s Eve for half the price and with fewer people, and spending the whole of the day itself in bed with a hangover. 

Call me a bore, a wet blanket, a drag, a killjoy, a drip – but this year I will be trying my best to let everyone how much I’m not enjoying New Year’s Eve. In fact, I needen’t even worry about the whole thing since I got the celebrations out of the way about eight hours ago when Sydney’s fireworks started to go off, and I was just finishing my breakfast.