Blog Page 1442

Sporting Rock Stars: John McEnroe

0

Tennis has had its fair share of sporting superstars. Famous names like Borg, Federer, Connors and Sampras have thrilled audiences with their skills on the court. Yet none have quite courted such a mix of controversy, skill, and entertainment value as this week’s sporting rock star, John McEnroe.

To understand the impact the young American made upon entering the Tennis scene in 1977, you have to imagine a time when sport was different than it is today. It was a time when sport was more about what was done on the field and not off of it. It was not common to see footballers intimidating and surrounding referees. In the ten- nis world, competitors like Bjorn Borg and Jimmy Connors simultaneously wowed and charmed audiences with their combination of athleticism and their sporting conduct; both on and off the court. Back then there was less of a celebrity culture associated with sportsman, their private lives were not splashed over the front pages, and they were left alone and were respected athletes. When American John McEnroe at 18, entered the ATP tour fresh out of Stanford University, things were about to change.

If you fancy a bit of procrastination type “John McEnroe Tennis Tantrums” into You- tube. He was famed for his outbursts, arguing regularly with umpires’ decisions, something audiences had never seen at Wimbledon. The current champion at the time, Borg, was almost the opposite, cool, collected and dubbed the “ice man” by his contempories. McEnroe, however, was nicknamed “superbrat” by the British media.

In 1981 at Wimbledon, he was fined $1,500 for calling an umpire “the pits of the world” in a First Round match. This shocked the typical middle-class tennis audience to the extent that he was booed regularly at matches. His catchphrase, coined in the same tournament, “you cannot be serious” is still replayed today. At a tournament in Stockholm in 1984, he demanded another unfortunate umpire to “answer my question…jerk!” slamming his racquet into a juice cart next to the court, which led to a suspension. His on-court antics led to a fall-out with the All England Club. After refusing to give him honorary membership, an honour normally accorded to those who win their first major championship, he refused to attend the traditional champion’s dinner naming the club’s members a bunch of “70-80 year old stiffs”.

Indeed, it is easy to forget that he was an exceptionally gifted tennis player. He was an aggressive performer, but he was also wily, perfecting the style of serve and volley, and managing to serve the ball almost with his back completely turned to his opponents, hiding which direction he would place the ball. Despite the controversy, he was massively successful, ending Borg’s dominance at Wimbledon, winning seven grand slam singles titles, nine grand slam doubles, 77 ATP listed singles titles, and reaching world number one in 1983. His total career earnings to date are $12,000,000. In addition, he still plays on the ATP champion’s tour and is familiar to current television audiences as a co-commentator at Wimbledon.

Swimming the English Channel: An Oxonian’s experience

0

It’s not every day that you have an earnest conversation with another person about the rationality of finding a patch of jellyfish and swimming through it, but this was a topic of great importance last week when I met with Marisa Schubert, a fourth year Oxford medic and aspiring English Channel swimmer.

Of all of the ways to get to France, it’s pretty obvious that swimming is neither the cheapest nor the quickest way, and I write from experience in saying that catching the ferry is definitely an easier way to get across. I swum the channel nearly four years ago, and normally when I think about my swim, I struggle to remember exactly why I wanted to do it. I remember the pain in my shoulders for days and days afterwards. I remember everything I ate and drank tasting of salt for at least a week after I finished. I remember sporadic parts of the swim. The feeling of nausea from following the bobbing light on my support boat for the several hours that I swam in the dark. I remember the all-pervading cold of the water and the feeling of cramp in parts of my body that I didn’t know it was possible to get cramp in, during the second half of the swim. I remember being tormented by the tides, the excitement of being able to clearly see the coast of France after about eight hours of swimming turning into frustration as I was pushed backwards for the next six hours. I remember complete numbness as I crawled onto the beach at Cap Blanc Nez, and spending the whole journey back being sick over the side of the boat. But I often struggle to remember why I thought it would be a good idea to attempt one of the hardest swims in the world. However, speaking to Marisa reminded me of some of the excitement and anticipation that I felt before my swim, and challenged me to reflect on the importance of testing our limits as human beings, whether that is swimming for over fourteen hours in cold, jellyfish infested water, or in another way.

For Marisa, the dream of swimming across the English Channel started aged eleven, when she read the incredibly inspiring autobiography of Lynne Cox, an open water swimmer who once held the world record for the fastest time to make the swim, and who also, as if the English Channel wasn’t cold enough, has swam in in the waters of Antarctica. At this point, attempting the swim was a dream for Marisa, but not something that she thought would genuinely be possible for her to do.

However, over the next few years this dream has slowly evolved into a reality as she discovered her love of cold water and started to realise that attempting the crossing may be more than just a dream, but a real possibility. I can remember always being the swimmer who inched into the sea slowly, moaning about how cold it was and often being dunked by the people I trained with, so the love of cold water is something that I don’t really understand. However the realisation that making the swim might be a real possibility and the excitement, combined with sporadic feelings of ‘why on earth am I doing this?’ is something that I can relate to well. And I think in different ways, we can all relate to this.

One of the things driving Marisa to attempt the swim is for the sense of fulfilment in seeing how far she can push herself physically and mentally. For me, knowing that I swam the channel reminds me that I am capable of coping with other challenges and of pushing through the barriers that my own mind can put up, telling me that my potential is somehow limited. The day I swam the channel was the longest, most painful day of my life, but speaking to Marisa about her forthcoming swim has reminded me of why I wanted to swim to France and why I am so glad that I did. I’m not advocating that everyone gets in the sea and starts training to swim the Channel, but I think that it is important that every now and again we consider the dreams that we have, and whether they are perhaps more achievable than we believe.

Cricket: A Varsity win and a Varsity washout

0

The Oxford University Cricket Club’s Varsity campaign got off to a wet start on Friday, as the men’s Twenty20 fixture was abandoned without a ball being bowled. Earlier in the day, the women secured a comprehensive victory against Cambridge, ensuring their dominant run of four straight Twenty20 victories.

The Oxford women’s team put in a dominant performance with both bat and ball to claim victory as the rain held off. Following a strong opening partnership of 28 by the Cambridge openers, good middle overs bowling and sharp catching saw Oxford restrict the Cambridge side to 77 from their 20 overs. Wickets were shared around the six bowlers used by Oxford, but the figures of captain Tina Gough (1-8 off 4 overs) and Ridhi Kashyap (2-10 off 4 overs) were particularly impressive. Oxford chase was comprehensive with a range of clean hit- ting and clever batting seeing the team chase the target in the thirteenth over. Eleanor Bath batted through the innings with a well-made 29 to see the team to victory, whilst an aggressive innings by wicket-keeper Lucy Stuchfield (31 off 24 balls) was instrumental in the team’s victory. This win marks the fourth successive Twenty20 victory for the women and they will be hoping to continue their good form when they face Cambridge again on June 20 at the Lords Nursery Ground.

Disappointingly for the players, the fans that had come out to watch, and the sponsors in attendance at the men’s, the match was not able to begin. Following a lunch reception for the players and guests, which included former England players and Oxford and Cambridge Blues Vic Marks and Michael Atherton, the rain continued to drizzle. Hopes were raised by news of a 4.30 pitch inspection, resulting in the players from both sides leaving the shelter offered by their changing rooms to partake in some preliminary warm-ups. The sites of Cambridge kicking around a football and the Oxford players throwing a vortex on the field of play, accompanied by the music that had been played throughout the day, appeared encouraging for the fans that had sought refuge and beverages in the Rose and Crown pub and sponsors’ tents. They would, however, be left disappointed as the 4.30pm inspection came to the conclusion that was feared by all in attendance. Concerns about the state of the bowler’s run-ups from both the ECB appointed umpires and the ground staff led to captains Gus Kennedy and Tom Elliott agreeing that the match would have to be abandoned. News filtered around the players and fans that had attended, a disappointing way to end an event that had a lot of effort put into it by many people.

The men’s attention will now turn to the 50-over and four-day varieties of the game, in preparation for the Varsity fixtures later in the summer. The 50-over match will be held at Lord’s Cricket Ground on Friday 20 May, while the First Class four-day fixture will be held at the Parks from 30 June – 3 July. The Blues still have much cricket in the coming weeks despite examination season being well and truly un- derway. The team travel to Cardiff this coming Wednesday for their last game of the BUCS season against Cardiff Metropolitan University. Oxford University’s BUCS campaign has been somewhat mixed, with disappointing losses to Bristol and Bath while securing dominant victories against Southampton and Surrey. The BUCS season has however provided an opportunity for many to get Blues cricketing experi- ence in the lead up to the varsity matches later this summer. Last week, first year undergraduate Richard O’Grady took the opportunity to bat at the top of the innings scoring a dominant 131 not out, guiding Oxford to victory against Surrey University. O’Grady dominated the Surrey attack despite battling cramps throughout his innings, hitting particularly strongly down the ground. Supported well by Sam Cato (41*) the duo ensured Oxford reached their target with ten overs remaining. Such individual performances are likely to be remembered when varsity selection comes around.

Red ball cricket will now be the focus of the Blues, with the Parks hosting five fixtures prior to the four-day game which is set to round off the summer.

Next week sees the Marylebone Cricket Club visit the Blues for a three day fixture, 2-4 June. The fixture should provide good preparations for the Varsity match offering, for many, the first chance of the summer to play some longer format cricket.

 

Financial Fair Play: an impending clash for club owners?

0

 

Bobby Zamora’s goal on Saturday may have just caused a massive headache for the Football League. QPR’s assent into the big time once again may cause the start of a battle between owners and the footballing authorities over sustainable finance. The sight of Tony Fernandes, jumping on the back of Joey Barton could have been inspired by the fact that he may have just escaped the clutches of Football League punishment. In contravention of the Financial Fair Play regulations, QPR posted losses of £65.4m in 2012-13, with a wage bill of £68m. This year, despite loaning many of their more expensive players out to Europe, finances are not projected to look much better; they are not expected to have reached the Football League’s target of reducing losses to £8m. The Football League’s sanctions to non-conforming and frivolously spending clubs include a transfer ban and a fine for ambitious overspending clubs. But they are not enforceable for clubs entering the Premier League, since these are under a different jurisdiction who have refused to enforce theFootball League’s punishment.

 

Potnetially, this could lead to the Football League attempting to en- force the fine through the courts. UEFA and all professional leagues in England have created FFP rules in an attempt to cut spending. In the Premier League, clubs are not permitted to have losses over £105m (£15m if no equity injected into the clubs), otherwise they face a points deduction. In the Championship clubs have to re- duce losses season-on-season to a maximum of £3m by 2015. Clubs in Europe cannot post more than £45m losses over 3 years.

 

Recently Manchester City and Paris St Germain have been hit with a €60m fine and a restriction on the number of players they can enter into next year’s Champions League competition. Indeed, Manchester City has been accused by some of trying to circumvent FFP rules through a lucrative £400m contract over ten years with Etihad, who happen to be owned by Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the half-brother of Man City owner Sheikh Mansour.

 

Many have questioned the validity of enforcing financial regulations in football. A court case dealt with by the European Commission has already defeated a legal challenge to the rules in May 2014 – where a Belgian agent attempted to argue that the rules restricted investment, dampened wages and locked-in the power of the big clubs. The court ruled there was no case to answer. In spite of this, Tony Fernandes has already vowed to fight any fines given to QPR.

 

The rules were first devised in 2012, in response to the unsustainable levels of spending in professional football. The modern game has seen inflation of transfer fees and wages entering into billions of pounds. In 2013, the world’s most expensive player, Gareth Bale, cost Real Madrid a staggering £85.3m. The rise of clubs such as Manchester City, where an Abu Dhabi-based consortium bought the club in 2008 and proceeded to make a loss of £93m in 2008-09 and £121m in 2009-10, has caused concerns over the competitiveness of the sport. The Premier League table looks like a list of the top spending clubs on players’ wages.

 

In response to such concerns, it has been pointed out that, without teams like Manchester City, Chelsea and PGS entering the fray, the top competitions of European Football would be dominated by the same teams like Manchester United and Real Madrid. From this angle, the regulations protect the dominant teams and prevent a challenge to the status quo.

 

Yet, arguments that football needs to become sustainable, before the bubble bursts do have force. High levels of spending and debt can only remain when the sport stays popular and attracts worldwide audiences. There is no guarantee that such levels of interest will continue into the indefinite future. What then for clubs like Manchester United, who incurred £265 debt against its assets when the Glazer family acquired a majority shareholding in 2005?

 

Certain clubs attempting to enter the big- time have also fallen foul when the investment ran out. Portsmouth is a good example of this. They entered administration and dropped from the Premier League to league 2 in 4 years after a report of £58m debt in 2012. Other clubs, such as Chester City and Darlington have been liquidated, despite long histories in the Football League.

 

It will be interesting to see who takes the hit: the clubs, or the players’ wages. Professional sport is one of the only industries to have continued to prosper throughout the financial cri- sis, but can it continue to do so?

 

It is clear something has to be done about the frivolous spending by all clubs across the football world, before the bubble does eventually burst. FFP is a means of doing so which is facing strong resistance from many clubs, who stand to lose out.

 

As a result, be prepared for a clash fairly soon between owners and the football authorities. The scene could well get very messy, very quickly.

 

Cherwell Sport’s guide to Summer Eights

0

This week sees the biggest event in college rowing return to the Isis. Summer Eights takes place between Wednesday 28th May and Saturday 31st May between 11:50am and 6:45pm, except on Saturday when racing is between 10:45am and 5:45pm.

The traditional Bumps event, in which a number of boats chase each other in single file, with each crew attempting to catch and “bump” the boat in front without being caught by the boat behind, is expected to attract thousands of spectators to the boathouses and banks of the Isis. The crowd, made up of students and alumni, flock to the river to see the rowing but also to experience to bustling atmosphere on race day and perhaos even to enjoy a glass of Pimms in the sun.

Rowing on, the qualifying event for the race, took place last week, attracting crews of all abilities to take to the water in pursuit of glory, and a set of blades. The time trial event saw Mansfield M2 and Wolfson M3, and Jesus W3 and Green Templeton W3, come top of the men’s and women’s qualifiers respectively. The day’s action saw only one disqualification with Jesus M4 Captain evacuating the boat after the crew posted a time that would have seen them qualify.

The competition itself sees Pembroke chased by Christ Church and Oriel in the M1 division. Oriel M1 are favourites amongst the rowing faithful, with Malcolm Howard, president of the 2014 Boat Race winning OUBC, in their crew. The Women’s division 1 sees St. John’s followed by Wadham, Teddy Hall and Pembroke, with Wadham W1 looking strong as favourites. 

The top of the Women’s division is set to be a tight contest too, with St. John’s and Wadham hosting no Blues or university rowers.

Trinity is host to one of the most decorated crews, with Blues Constantine Louloudis and Michael DiSanto, and Isis rower James Fraser-Mackenzie rowing for their M1. They start in eigth position however, so are likely to make fourth or fifth spot this year, setting them in good stead for victory next year.

Sam Skillcorn, Vice Captain of Jesus College Boat Club, predicts that “Keble M1 are going to smash it from the bottom of division 1, since they have loads of internationals and ex-Olympians in their boat”. To mention only one of them; Tim Foster is part of their crew, and was part of the Sydney 2000 Olympic GB Gold Medal winning four alongside Matthew Pinsent, Sir Steve Redgrave and James Cracknell. 

Having only recently entered the rowing scene, Green Templeton have been on the rise since they entered the summer eights competition. Having moved up the divisons every year, they are now 11th in division 4, and are likely to continue their climb.

At the other end of the spectrum, Exeter are rumoured to have relatively poor crews, and don’t seem to be backing themselves either by only entering M1 and W1 boats. Both crews are rowing in division two, so will face tight competition.

Now in full swing, summer eights is set to be as exciting and as hotly-contested as ever.

OUDC Cuppers introduces 190 students to the world of Dance

A chant begins from one corner of Iffley Sport Centre as athletes in waistcoats and dresses return from the dance floor to the spectating area.

As the exhausted Quickstep dancers quickly grab a drink of water, two rival chants begin elsewhere around the main floor in support of Trinity and Teddy Hall. Finally, the compere – competitive dancesport’s version of a master of ceremonies – booms over the PA system the numbers of the competitors who have made the fourth round of the Jive. The chants are replaced by localised cheers as the successful couples take the floor.

For a moment, an anxious silence settles amongst the over 300 spectators and competitors. The atmosphere is still and tense in anticipation. Finally, the bouncing beats of Christina Aguilera’s “Candyman” come over the loud-speakers. Immediately, the colleges resume their raucous yelling as the couples take hold and fly into a flurry of kicks and flicks.

All this commotion is a result of Oxford University Dancesport Club’s annual Cuppers competition. Following on from Cherwell Sport’s preview of the Dancesport Cuppers competition in Issue 4 this term, we bring you the review. Over 200 participants from 25 colleges took part in the biggest dance-off of the year. In the competition, each college creates teams of four couples, each competing in either the Waltz, Quickstep, Cha Cha, or Jive. Each couple must be made up of at least one beginner and the teaching format is similar to that of Strictly Come Dancing. Experienced dancers teach beginners as much as they can starting anything between 3 weeks and 3 days before the event. Couples score points based on how far they advance in the competition. These count towards two categories – a team match and an overall college score. This year’s overall winners, Trinity College, recruited 40 dancers creating five full teams. By a 2.5 point margin, they beat Keble College, who fielded a team of 30 dancers. The best four-couple team went to Keble.

To get ahead in the game, some participants attended classes in Ballroom and Latin hosted throughout the year by the dancesport club, OUDC. The club’s Ballroom and Latin classes are part of a broader social and competitive dancing framework that includes the full-Blue competitive team, a beginner’s team, a competitive Rock ‘n’ Roll team, the Rueda Komrades, and a variety of social dancing classes in each discipline.

The competitive Ballroom and Latin main and beginners teams, along with the Rock ‘n’ Roll squad went head to head with Cambridge at the Varsity Match one week prior to Cuppers, in addition to five other competitions across the country in Michaelmas and Hilary terms. The highlight of the year is the Inter-Varsity Dancesport Competition at the Blackpool Winter Gardens Ballroom, where approximately 800 people from university teams across the entire country compete.

Many of the experienced dancers who compete for OUDC were on hand at Cuppers to captain the 25 college teams and coach the new, inexperienced dancers to victory. A lot of these now experienced dancers started their dancesport career after competing in a previous Cuppers event and then subsequently joined the Beginners Team.

Cherwell Sport’s very own editor attended the event out of curiosity and stayed for the whole competition. The level of skill involved with ballroom dancing throughout the university was very high, but was complemented nicely by an array of beginners getting involved.

Dancesport is arguably one of the fastest growing sports in Oxford, with a growing number of participants, and an increasing turnout from supporters each year. The Cuppers competition is definitely something worth getting involved in for dancers of all levels, and particularly beginners who want to learn the basics and perform them in a relatively short space of time. It was great to see the surprise and delight on the faces of the beginners that managed to progress through the rounds, with some going on to make the final.

The commentary team were also entertaining, and always on the ball, providing jokes, which were sometimes at the expense of the dancers, to keep the crowd entertained in the short intervals.

Even if only to spectate, make sure you get down to Iffley Road for the competition next year, as it really is a pleasure to watch and a great day out for both dancers and audience!

Living Internationally: Thoughts of a second-year linguist

0

I’ve done it. With one click, I’ve bought my plane ticket to Germany this summer. In just over a month I’ll be embarking on the first leg of my year abroad, but only now does it really hit me that I’m actually going away.
For the past couple of months I and many of my fellow linguists have been oscillating between a wide range of emotions: giddy excitement, anxiety, sheer panic, denial, to name but a few. By now most of the stress of actually finding a placement has passed, but the even more overwhelming stress of Oh-my-God-how-am-I-going-to-survive-abroad-on-my-own-for-a-year has begun to kick in.

The impending horror of having to set up the WiFi on my laptop all by myself is almost too much, though this pales in comparison to a friend of mine bound for Paraguay, who has carried out extensive research on the bugs and diseases which could potentially bring her year abroad to a premature (and rather painful) end.

Tales from returning fourth years don’t help to allay the anxiety. One poor guy turned up in Austria with the promise of a spare room which turned out to be little more than the sofa in the front room, whilst many students bound for Paris were ripped off by an online scam renting out apartments which didn’t even exist, leaving them out of pocket and without a roof over their heads.

That being said, there are plenty of stories to fill an outward-bound linguist with anticipation. One French student became a local hero in the tiny French village he was placed in by leading their amateur rugby team to victory. Just as it is in Oxford, rugby is BIG in France. Spain, on the other hand is a country of football fans, and, as I learnt from a previous visit, you’d better have an opinion on the Real Madrid/Barcelona rivalry prepared before you go.

The year abroad can also offer plenty of amorous opportunities – one fourth year’s top tip for making the most out of your year abroad? “Just get a French boyfriend.” (This only really helps if you do French, of course – not much use if you’re studying German or Spanish, though most of us still wouldn’t say no to a Frenchman…) Just make sure you save the account of your experiences of ‘international affairs’ for brief Skype chats with your stressed Finalist friends, unlike one returning linguist, who spent the best part of a formal dinner regaling her tutors with a full and detailed account of her love life during her year abroad.

Of course, as exciting/terrifying as going abroad may be, it’s still tinged with sadness at the thought of leaving Oxford and the people who make it feel like home, many of whom will, rather inconveniently, have graduated by the time I get back. Though they might have jokingly offered to do a Masters/rusticate in order to keep me company, the desolate landscape of fourth year is a grim prospect to return to after the fun and excitement of the year abroad.

A year abroad also means a year ‘out of the loop’, something that can happen even after being out of Oxford for a week. That being said, most of what we’re likely to miss from final year will be thrilling 8 hour stints in the library with the occasional stress-related meltdown to liven the mood.

I did nearly panic, though, when a good friend informed me he was planning to deactivate his Facebook account for most of third year, (“But how will I keep in contact with you??” Momentarily forgetting that Skype and email also exist…) though the chances of him following through on this threat are admittedly slim. Above all, the thought of not witnessing your closest friends finish their exams, get trashed and then get horrifically, hilariously drunk afterwards is rather bleak.

On the plus side, this does give us one more year to delay finals and, by extension, the onset of the ‘real world’. While most of our friends will by then be slogging away at a 9-to-5 graduate job, we get to live the student life in the city of dreaming spires for a little while longer – a rather appealing prospect.

But then again, who knows what we’ll have seen and done during our year away? After living and working abroad independently for a year it must seem strange returning to the confines of university life. I’m pretty sure there must be at least one student every couple of years who, after finding their true calling in foreign climes, decides to jack in their degree and join a traveling circus or something similar… That could even be me.

Though it may be a compulsory part of our degree, it’s often said that the year abroad is a chance to really discover who you are as a person and what you want from life.

Despite the stress and anxiety, Many linguists have this in mind as they embark on their year abroad and hope to return to Oxford in a year a changed person, though in many ways still the same.

Students Loans Company criticised over data breaches

0

The Student Loans Company has been criticised over a series of data breaches, involving several incidents where information held about students has been sent to the wrong people.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has reported several incidents where classified data held about students, including medical details and psychological assessments, had been sent to the wrong people. An ICO investigation found that not enough checks were carried out to safeguard protected information, and more sensitive documents actually received fewer checks.

Since students are required to send personal information when applying for loans, this lack of security and leaking of information has breached primary principles of the Data Protection Act, which ensures that personal information is secure and protected.

The ICO Head of Enforcement, Stephen Eckersley, is reported as saying, “For the majority of students, the Student Loans Company represents a crucial service that they rely on to fund their studies. Students are obliged to provide personal information to the loans company, both while they receive the loan and in the years when they are paying it back, and they are right to expect that information to be properly looked after.

He continued, “Our investigation showed that wasn’t happening. We’ve spoken with the company and made clear that changes need to be made, and a formal undertaking is now in place.”

Imogen Crane, a first year student at Regent’s Park College, commented, “It’s a huge breach of student trust, especially considering how many students rely, almost completely, on the loan company for their day to day life, as well as larger bills. It’s incredibly irritating because we are so dependent on the loans just to afford university so to hear that they have lost and misplaced our personal information reinforces my dislike of the loan system that is currently in place.”

Welfare Officer, Isobel Wilson, expressed similar concerns, “As a welfare officer, it’s worrying to hear that students who are already under extreme stress have to deal with the possibility that the loans system they rely on is insecure. It is not conducive to a healthy college atmosphere to have any worries regarding misplaced information, especially that as sensitive as loans, grants and psychological tests.”

Tom Rutland, OUSU President, told Cherwell, “This is disappointing news – students taking out loans with the Student Loans Company should be able to trust that their data and personal information is safe.”

The Student Loans Company Ltd has signed an undertaking that ensures future correspondences involving protected data will be better secured and thoroughly checked so as to prevent future incidents.

 

Sullivan escapes vote of no confidence

0

Oxford Union President Ben Sullivan avoided a vote of no confidence on Thursday evening after members voted to withdraw the motion.

After a three-hour debate, Union member Inigo Lapwood proposed to cancel the motion of no confidence on grounds that “whichever way people voted would have had a non-negligible effect on the ongoing criminal proceeding”. The motion not to vote passed 254 to 101.

The original motion “This House has no confidence in the president, Benjamin Sullivan, Christ Church” was posted in the Union last Thursday, 15th May, and was signed by over 30 members. This came in response to Sullivan’s arrest on 7th May on suspicion of rape and attempted rape.

Aleksy Gaj, who proposed the motion of no confidence, stood first to address the packed chamber. Gaj told the House, “Tonight, my speech is not a comment on the allegations made against Mr Sullivan. It is not to pervert the course of justice in the British legal system.

“This is a sad time for Mr Sullivan and his friends, I agree. But this is no basis to be running the Union as its figurehead and president,” he concluded.
The heated debate that followed saw a range of issues raised, including worries about affecting Sullivan’s court case and faltering public opinion of the Union.

The heated debate that followed Gaj’s opening remarks saw a range of issues raised, including worries about affecting Sullivan’s court case and faltering public opinion of the Union. At one point, Union member Joe Miles declared, “We are making national media for all the wrong reasons.”

Speaking after the debate, Barnaby Raine condemned Sullivan’s conduct, “I absolutely want to be as clear as it is possible to be: Ben Sullivan is innocent until he is proven guilty. Nobody has ever denied that, and he should stop implying to the press that anyone is denying that, because nobody is.

“If as a society you take rape seriously as a crime, then these are the things you don’t do: you don’t when allegations are made, try to use Union money to shut up the press from reporting about those allegations without even telling the members that you are doing it; you don’t have that discussion in secret, in Camera, not on the record so no one knows what’s it’s about, and when someone asks for the minutes of the meeting tell them the minutes aren’t available… You don’t refuse to stand aside without prejudice as the Secretary General of Interpol told you to do; you don’t just dismiss it and carry on as normal.”

If you do take rape seriously, the moment that allegations are made – at least, the moment you are arrested – you step aside until you have proven yourself innocent. I wish Ben Sullivan had done that. If he’d done that we wouldn’t be here today, there wouldn’t be any trouble, and people wouldn’t be crying outside this Union chamber tonight.”

Speaking about the allegations of sexual assault against Sullivan, one student present at the debate commented, “I have suffered in the past; I know what it is like. But that doesn’t mean I don’t believe someone should be judged before they go to court.”

Inigo Lapwood, who proposed the motion to drop the no-confidence vote under Rule 43 d) ii), also emphasised the need to avoid using the Union as a courtroom.

“I would not risk having an innocent man declared guilty, or a guilty man evade justice due to Union bullshit. Rape allegations are too serious to be hijacked and wielded as a weapon for student political agendas,” Lapwood stated.

Towards the end of the debate there was widespread confusion over Lapwood’s secondary motion. Josh Atkinson, a member from St Benet’s and last term’s Returning Officer explained, “Tonight a lengthy debate was had on the motion of No confidence which culminated in a ‘leave of the house’ deciding whether the motion should be withdrawn or not.

“Under Rule 43 d) ii), a motion once put can only be withdrawn by ‘leave of the house’; this is what happened. After Inigo’s proposal and the reception it received from the house, the chair assessed that the house may have wanted the motion withdrawn and thus let the house decided. The house decided to withdrawn the motion and thus remain silent due to the issue being so divisive.”

Sullivan did not attend the debate due to fear of contempt of court. A prepared statement was read during the debate on his behalf by the Chair, former Secretary Alex Trafford.

“The proposition will of course note that this debate has nothing to do with the allegations against me. However, I think it will be difficult to divorce my suitability to hold my office from the validity of the allegations against me. As I have said before, if I am charged, I will resign.”

“But passing a vote of no confidence at a time when I am not even able to defend myself would, I believe, go against everything the greater society stands for,” Sullivan’s statement read.

Speaking immediately after the debate, Sullivan told Cherwell, “I am pleased that the House has decided to defer to the appropriate procedures of the criminal justice system.”

Although the President did not attend the debate, members reported seeing Sullivan standing outside the Union as members exited the chamber.
Aliya Yule, a student at the debate, told Cherwell, “Ben Sullivan said that his presence could possibly prejudice a court and he was told not to be here. He was here, he was standing outside when it happened. He was watching everyone come out, he was hugging his friends as they voted for the motion to be removed.

“It created an incredibly intimidating atmosphere, it was unbelievably insensitive to survivors of sexual assault, many of whom were in the chamber some of whom voiced their experiences and it further shows how the Union and Ben do not take these rape allegations seriously.”

Sullivan rejected these allegations, commenting, “I was outside soon after the vote speaking to some of my close friends. I am not sure how this constituted an intimidating atmosphere, especially given that the vote had already taken place. I also thought it odd that Barnaby Raine came up to me in the courtyard and demanded that I leave.”

A motion to bring in a Re-Open Nominations candidate at Union elections had been scheduled to be debated after the no-confidence motion. However under Rule 47 e) iii), 150 members have to vote on a rules change and after the end of the no confidence too few members were left in the chamber for a vote to be held.

Speaking to Cherwell, Josh Atkinson, a former RO and proposer of the RON motion, said, “I am saddened that the rules change introducing RON could not be passed. I believe that the Union needs this huge electoral reform and the rules change was written very well to bring it.”

He continued, “I am however annoyed that Standing Committee didn’t propose the rule so that it could be brought sooner, I believe this is due to many of its current members wanting to benefit from unopposed elections. I hope that the members get a choice of candidates in the next election with which they are happy and I will bring this motion again in the near future in the hope that, with fewer issues surrounding the Union, we can finally sort out our electoral process.”

The motion will be discussed at a future meeting but will not be in place during this term’s elections.

For a detailed account of the evening’s debate, see Cherwell’s live-tweets.