Friday 15th August 2025
Blog Page 1442

Student loans privatised

0

The loans, which were taken out by around a quarter of a million students between 1990 and 1998, have been sold to debt recovery company Erudio Student Loans for £160 million.

The move has sparked widespread concern across the country and Oxford students have been amongst those voicing their opposition.

James Elliott, who was elected an NUS delegate last week and is organising protests against the sale, commented, “The privatisation plan is simply outrageous. The only way that a private company will be able to profit from the loans will be to raise the interest rates, effectively making students pay a higher price for our education.

“This is exactly what happened to students in New Zealand a year ago. It does not even make economic sense in the rhetoric about ‘everyone bearing the brunt of austerity’. As the author Andrew McGettigan has said, these loans being privatised can only lose the government money in the long run.”

Olivia Arigho Stiles pointed out, “It effectively means the government will be imposing a retrospective hike in tuition fees, further eroding the access and attractiveness of higher education to less advantaged students”

David Willets, Universities and Science Minister, tried to dispel some of these worries in a statement released on Monday, “The sale will allow the Student Loans Company to focus on supplying loans to current students and collecting repayments on newer loans. Borrowers will remain protected and there will be no change to their terms and conditions, including the calculation of interest rates for loans.”

He also stressed the financial reasoning behind the government’s decision, commenting, “The sale of the remaining mortgage-style student loan book represents good value for money, helping to reduce public sector net debt by £160m. The private sector is well placed to maximise returns from the book which has a deteriorating value.”

However, this appears to have done little to allay student fears. A petition on the Government’s ‘e-petition’ website has been circulating around Oxford students, currently with around 16,000 signatures from people across the nation.

One student putting their name to the protest, Tom Haswell, from Exeter College, commented, “I don’t fully understand the fine details of the economics of this move, but what those who sign the petition are attempting to achieve is the sale’s debate in parliament, rather than sitting back and allowing it to happen. I, and many others, see this sale as short-sighted – given that student loans are a long-term investment.”

However, second year PPEist Rowan Lennox said, “Given that the government has not changed the conditions of the loans it is privatising and has guaranteed that interest rates will not rise, by selling them off it is able to reduce public debt without cost to the taxpayer.”

After last Wednesday’s demonstrations outside the Clarendon Centre, further protests have been planned for Tuesday.

College netball looking tense

0

As we enter 7th week, an exciting and competitive term of college netball action is drawing to a close, with some impressive talent on show across all the divisions. The title of Division 1 champions looks like it could go right down to the wire, as both New College and St Peter’s are currently on unbeaten runs.

One of the highlights of their campaign saw a particularly strong New College performance against Brasenose in which they scored sixteen unanswered goals. Things are not looking quite as good for Lincoln, who could be in danger of relegation after a run of four straight defeats, including a 14-3 rout by Teddy Hall.

Division 2 has seen some of the tightest matches so far, including a hotly-anticipated match between previously unbeaten teams from St Anne’s and St John’s. The closely-fought affair did not disappoint and tensions were run- ning high right up to the final whistle when a St John’s comeback was held off by St Anne’s. St Anne’s have attributed their 13-12 win to their mascot, Andy Hall, whose beaver costume and warm-up routines to renditions of ‘Physical’ have provided considerable motivation for the team.

Hall said of their success, “No doubt the leadership of captain Alice Rickett has ensured tight teamwork. Their wins may also be down to their rota of (rather gorgeous) men who really should take their shirts off more. It does wonders for morale and gets this beaver excited.”

Things have also been tight at the lower end of the league, with a 2-2 draw between Pembroke and Keble keeping Keble out of the same run of defeats experienced by LMH B.

The top of Division 3 has also been hotly-contested, with the top teams Somerville and Oriel B separated by just two goals in Oriel’s 12-10 victory. Unfortunately the league has suffered from several forfeited matches; St Peter’s B are currently unbeaten, having squeezed past Trinity 4-2 in their only match so far.

It has been a similar story in Division 4, with a run of four straight wins for Balliol ended by a 20-7 defeat to a strong St Catz B side, who have also played just one match.

In Division 5 Wadham are closing in on the top spot after six wins, including a particularly high-scoring game against Merton, who they defeated 25-6. A strong performance from a pre- viously unbeaten Jesus side meant the deciding game between them was a tense affair, with Wadham just edging it out by 12 goals to 11. The high standard of netball bodes well for the last few matches of Michaelmas and beyond. 

Big week for novice boaties

0

Fed up of being subjected to inane rowing chat for weeks, even months on end? Exasperated at being rudely awakened at the crack of dawn by your over-zealous, Isis-bound flatmate? Well, things are about to become a whole lot worse, for this Wednesday sees the start of the annual Christ Church Regatta, the showcase rowing event of Michaelmas term. Regarded as an ‘introductory’ competition, a gateway event that can lead to incurable levels of enthusiasm for all things rowing-related (the crews comprise of novices who have only recently picked up an oar for the first time), the regatta rarely disappoints. The rowers’ inexperience, the tension of the straight knock-out format and the unpredictable weather conditions are all key ingredients which form the potent winter broth that is the Christ Church Regatta, a tasty recipe which delights the spectators dotted along the river Isis, hungry for drama, mishaps and mayhem. And so in preparation for this week’s rowing extravaganza, here is a preview of what you can expect to see over the coming few days, including the basics for those of you (un)fortunate enough to have remained hitherto untainted by the rowing endemic sweeping across Oxford’s student population.

What?

The Christ Church Regatta, Oxford’s main rowing competition in Michaelmas term. Run entirely by members of Christ Church Boat Club, it is Oxford’s largest college-run rowing event.

When?

7th Week (27th – 30th November) – that’s four solid days of riveting rowing for you to enjoy. Racing is scheduled to take place from midday to dusk on Wednesday to Friday, and 9am to dusk on Saturday.

Where?

The river Isis. The inaugural race of this year’s regatta will begin opposite Christ Church boat-house, while the finishing line is approximately half way between Pembroke Boathouse and The Head. The remaining races will commence at Longbridges and finish at the same end-point. After the races, why not head over to the Head of the River pub to discuss the day’s major talking points over a hearty ale and some pork scratchings? The rowing chat need not end after the last boat has crossed the line.

Who?

The Christ Church Regatta is traditionally a competition for rowing newbies, those students who are having their first taster of the sport. Will the OUBC scouts unearth a hidden gem, a rough diamond, a Maradona of the waters at this year’s event? Who knows…

Why?

Because rowing is fun(?).

The Format

The rules are simple. Each boat comprises of a crew of eight and a cox, who then go head-to-head with another crew in a straight knock-out competition. Lose in the first round? Not to worry: you’ll be entered into the repecharge, a sort of competition for losers.

Crews to look out for

In order to formulate pre-regatta predictions, it is often useful to look at the results of the Nephthys Regatta – a warm-up event for its bigger sister which takes place the previous week. In the men’s section, Jesus College emerged victorious, easing past St. Hilda’s, St. Bennet’s, Wolfson and Merton in the earlier rounds before pipping Trinity to the post in the final. Under the guidance of their new, progressive coach Nick Fulton – dubbed “the Jürgen Klopp of rowing” – the Jesus men’s crew are certainly worth looking out for this year, and surely head into the event as favourites. As for the women’s section, look no further than Brasenose – 2012 and 2013 winners of Nephthys Regatta, they are bound to be formidable opponents and will be looking to replicate last week’s success as the Christ Church Regatta kicks off on Wednesday.

And so the stage is set for Michaelmas’ headline rowing event; with the Christ Church Regatta often proving to be a useful indicator of how strong a crew will be for the Torpids and Summer Eights in Hilary and Trinity, there is no reason

for you not to make your way down to the Isis this week for some oar-inspiring entertainment. Rejoice, for rowing is back! Again! 

 

Rugby reserves prove point

0

The Oxford University Maroons and Coventry 2nds both came into Wednesday’s game with two losses and one win apiece, making this match the archetypal six pointer. At University Parks, tensions were high and sweat adorned both teams’ brows as the ball sailed into the air at kickoff.

Oxford were quick to establish their dominance with Worcester’s speedster Stephen Wilks opening the scoring to make it 4-0 to Oxford after Jake Whittaker failed to convert. Calum Lomas maintained Oxford’s momentum by steamrolling the Coventry centre and popping the ball up to Loftus, who scored directly under the posts for the first of a brace of tries in what was soon to become an unequivocal man-of-the-match performance. Whittaker’s second conversion could not have been easier yet confusion over whether the game was one of rugby league or crossbar challenge led him to fire a powerful effort into the horizontal bar, leaving the score at 8-0 to Oxford. Oxford’s fourth try epitomised the levelof control they had over the game, with Lomas catching the ball straight from the kickoff and running across and around the Coventry backline to streak down the touchline before offloading to Bentley, who stumbled over the line in a mouth-watering exhibition of proficiency that came a mere 30 seconds after the third try. The conversion was taken successfully by James Clark: a disgruntled Whittaker looked on wistfully as the ball sailed over the bar for the first of 5 successful kick attempts. Oxford continued to put pressure on Coventry throughout the first half, with Abeku Nelson and Joe Nour making numerous powerful runs whilst Loftus ran the backline like an approachable yet stern drill-sergeant. The key to Oxford’s success in the first half was their monopoly over possession, driven primarily by virtue of a firstclass defence.

The second half, however, told a different story. The home team’s 38-0 half-time lead added an element of apathy, building on occasional lapses in concentration from the first half such as Whittaker’s decision to shepherd a second row through the Maroons’ ranks. Despite this, Oxford did well, with occasional brilliance in defence resulting in risible unforced errors from the visitors that were met with scornful screams of ‘knocky knocky’ from an obnoxious sideline contingent. They also managed to keep the scoreboard ticking over, though at a slower rate than in the first half, scoring 22 second half points, including a pinpoint crossfield kick by Loftus for Bhaduri to score that chimed as it landed on a penny. Lomas completed his brace in the second half whilst Whittaker’s unfortunate day continued with his role in Coventry’s sole try of the day. An excellent first half performance secured the victory for the home team and the second-half saw the team do enough to secure a final score of 60-4 to Oxford.

Moving forward, things are starting to look up on all fronts for the fledgling club.

Blues 2 – 0 Birmingham

0

After suffering a 5-1 defeat away to Birmingham University 1sts in their first league game of the season, the Blues knew they would have a fight on their hands when they welcomed Birmingham back to Iffley Road last Wednesday.

The Blues got off to a rocky start, and in the first 10 minutes were very much on the back foot. However Oxford somehow weathered the early storm. Slowly the Blues started to play their way back into the game, mainly due to a tactical change by Blues Captain Jack Fletcher, who moved Pembroke captain Alex Tsaptsinos from a more attacking role back into defensive midfield, alongside the Blues Belgian player Elias Adriaenssens.

This formational change shored up the midfield and allowed the Blues to start playing the fluid passing football that they have become accustomed to at home this season.

The Blues began creating chances, as the Birmingham midfielders failed to pick up the overlapping runs of the Blues’ fullbacks, in particular left-back Aidan Barry who took every opportunity to overlap Blues winger Ezra Rubenstein to try and help provide an attacking threat.

Eventually the Blues got their breakthrough; a diagonal run from Matt Smith pulled away two defenders and this gave American Mike Essman time to whip in a deep looping cross which was calmly dispatched with a first time side footed volley by Peder Beck-Friis.

The Blues took a 1-0 lead into half time but they were by no means complacent, and an inspirational team talk from the captain let the players know they had done nothing yet.

There was another tough 45 minutes ahead and there was no way that this Birmingham team were going to roll over and give the Blues another home win.

In the second half the Blues came out strong, and they began to create more chances. The Blues continued to play some lovely football through the midfield and were constantly finding Ezra Rubenstein on the left wing, who all game caused the Birmingham right back a lot of difficulty.

However, Birmingham still carried a significant threat particularly through their impressive frontman and it was only due to the solid defending of Rich Smith and Mike Moneke at centre back that prevented Birmingham from equalising.

As time went on there was a growing sense that the Blues were going to score another goal. A great passing move culminated in a mazy run from Tsaptsinos which saw him chopped down in the area, and the referee awarded a penalty. Ezra Rubenstein did not waste any time at all in picking up ball and placing it on the spot, he then calmly stepped up and slotted the ball into the bottom right-hand corner, just beating the goalkeeper, who dived the correct way.

The final 20 minutes saw the introduction of some fresh new legs, and this allowed the Blues to see out the remaining minutes with only one slight hiccup.

With 10 minutes to go Birmingham had a goal rightly denied due to an offside flag, but apart from that Birmingham never threatened the Blues’ goal, and when the final whistle went Oxford celebrated a hard fought and well deserved victory.

Friday fight night doesn’t go to plan

0

There were mixed fortunes for Oxford’s boxers on Friday night as the first bouts of the season got under way in the long preparation for the annual Varsity match. Five OUABC boys faced off against boxers from the local Oxford Boxing Academy in their annual show at the Kassam Stadium.

The Oxford Boxing Academy, a club based in Northway, work under the mantra that “boxing is misunderstood by people who do not box”. As an amateur club covered occasionally by the likes of Sky Sports, they were always likely to prove a tough challenge at this foetal stage of OUABC’s season.

Sadly this proved true, as the local club got the better of the University boys in three of the five outings, but there were strong positives to be salvaged from a brace of victories from the University’s pugilists.

It was a debut showing for Heman Joshi (Teddy Hall), Richard Beck (Somerville) and Stephen O’Driscoll (Somerville). Jack Straker (Queens) had his first bout as a Dark Blue having boxed on his year abroad in Lyons last, and this marked the third outing for returning Blue, and this year’s captain, Ian Holland (St. Benet’s).

Joshi opened proceedings, tipping the scales at 74 kg, and facing the more experienced local Zeeshan Moughal who had two bouts to his name. Joshi looked tentative initially, his opponent showing more confidence in letting his punches go early on. But, dominating the centre through his superior strength, Joshi scored some nice straight jabs in the first round and seemed to be leading on points. Moughal reined in his swinging, and started to box in a more careful, albeit cagey, fashion. Joshi grew in confidence in the final round, using his size to dictate the pace and leaving the judges to award him a majority decision.

Fortunes took a bit of a nose-dive for the Oxford boys in the next few bouts, however. In another Middleweight match, Straker faced Nasser Balayo – whose speed and dynamism belied his thickset physique.

Straker worked ceaselessly in the first but was unable to gain ground on Balayo or break through his cast-iron guard. After both boxers settled in and started to swing a little, Straker caught some heavy shots – initially remaining resolute – yet by the third round Balayo’s sharp inside-work and fluent head movement meant he was breaking through with enough frequency to tip the decision unanimously in his favour.

Up next was Stephen O’Driscoll who was – quite literally – fighting an uphill battle from the start. Joshua Rigby towered over O’Driscoll by a good few inches and was able to hold him on the ropes for the majority of the bout’s duration. O’Driscoll managed to elude his adversary’s reach to begin with, but was rarely able to move past the jab and score. One clean backhand from Rigby spelled a standing-count for O’Driscoll in the first round from which he easily recovered, but Rigby reprised the same move in the second, at which point the referee elected to stop the contest despite the protestations of O’Driscoll – who was beginning to assert himself and insisted he could continue. Blue Richard Beck was next, and also on the wrong side of a premature stop-page in his welterweight contest. Beck faced an awkward southpaw, and both looked tentative in the first round as they tried to find their range. The contest livened up significantly in the second with both boxers displaying a range of shots many of which landed. Nothing separated them at the beginning of the third, but Beck began to wear and his opponent capitalised, forcing a standing count. Beck recovered but fell victim to a textbook backhand immediately as the fight resumed. At this point, the ref called a technical knockout against Beck with barely seconds left in the round, leaving Oxford with a third disappointment.

Skipper Ian Holland was to restore some dignity after a string of tough losses in the most technically pyrotechnic bout of the evening. It started poorly for Holland, facing Adam Howard at 74kg, with his opponent landing a big left bodyshot instantaneously.. Holland was visibly stunned but quickly recovered. Howard’s oeuvre seemed to be decidedly one-note, as he alternated between his original shot and a big right hand to the head for the first two rounds both of which Holland shrugged off repeatedly. Despite his opponent’s aggression, Holland kept the fight technical and scored freely. He was the more expressive boxer throughout and the result showed with a majority victory. Howard stopped gunning for the knockout and began trying to box Holland in the third and final round, which was more evenly scored, but had left himself with too large a deficit – he took defeat ignominiously, refusing to shake the OUABC boy’s hand after the decision was given to Holland.

Despite the losses, prospects look bright for OUABC. At the same show last year, James Watson and Mikey Davis both suffered defeat and went on to win by knockout in Varsity. As club president Jack Straker told Cherwell a few weeks ago, “the coaches have said that they have never before seen a squad this strong at the start of the season”, and on that basis it is definitely worth dwelling on the positives from last week’s showing.

Next term is action packed for OUABC, with all five of Friday’s boxers, and a fair few others, boxing at the Oxford Union in the third week of Hilary. The club will be defending the Varsity crown in 7th week.

OULC dismayed with Labour Students

0

Oxford University Labour Club is considering disaffiliating yet again from Labour Students, the national organisation of students in the Labour Party.

A motion proposed at the club’s general meeting on Tuesday by former OULC Co-Chair Joe Collin suggested that the club should disaffiliate from Labour Students, write a letter to the organisation to explain their reasons for doing so and conduct another vote on whether to re-affiliate at the end of Hilary.

Collin’s original motion noted that some members were concerned about the openness of Labour Student, saying, “It is the opinion of some of those OULC members who attended conference this year that Labour Students did not show themselves to be an open organisation.”

He suggested in the motion that the national organisation “does not act as a forum for debate on what Labour Party policy should be and is too eager to toe the party line” and that it, “fails to engage politically motivated students with important issues.”

The motion also stated, “It damages the club’s image and contradicts the club’s principles to be affiliated to this organisation” and, should OULC vote to disaffiliate, “pressure would be put on Labour Students to change”.

However, during the course of the meeting, an amendment to the motion was proposed and accepted as friendly, which instead mandated the Co-Chairs to write an open letter to Labour Students identifying the concerns their members have with the organisation.

Every year the club conducts a vote in Hilary term to decide whether or not to re-join Labour Students, which constitutes the main link between the society and the national Labour Party. The amended motion saw members in attendance at the meeting resolve to make the decision on whether to re-affiliate in Hilary 2014 based on the response to the open letter.

The motion was passed by a significant majority of members, with only two votes in opposition and one abstention.

The exact content of the letter is yet to be determined, but will be approved by OULC members prior to being sent to Labour Students at the club’s next meeting.

Current Co-Chairs Helena Dollimore and Aled Jones told Cherwell, “We are extremely glad that OULC decided not to repeat the disaffiliation that happened two years ago. Disaffiliation would have been extremely detrimental to the Labour Club in what would essentially be a pointless manoeuvre, and at a time when Labour Students are building up to the General Election, it is much better to be around the table, offering constructive arguments for change, instead of exiting the arena entirely.”

OULC has already severed ties with Labour Students in the past; in 2011, the club disaffiliated with Labour Students for a year, predominantly due to concerns about the democracy of the organisation. A statement released by the club at the time said, “We could no longer remain within an institution whose democratic failings we feel increasingly threaten to undermine its positive work.”

However, it joined the national organisation again the following year, and, a few months later, won the Labour Students ‘Best Labour Club of the Year’ award.

Collin said, “I’m very pleased with the passage of the amended motion. It was clear that nearly all members present had concerns with Labour Students, concerns that ranged from their ability to engage students, debate policy and their internal organisation.

“Hopefully, upon receiving our open letter, they will begin to address some of our grievances which may well be shared by other University Labour Clubs.”

Dan Turner, OULC Co-Chair Elect, told Cherwell, “Labour Students is effective in many ways, with the training programmes and campaign coordination it offers. There is a widespread feeling in OULC, though, that it fails to lead or even generate debate, and does not act as an effective voice for students with the Party.

He added, “Given that we only recently re-affiliated with Labour Students, many of our members (myself included) feel that an open dialogue with the Labour Students leadership would be the best way to achieve reform, and so we will continue to lobby for greater transparency and responsiveness.

“We hope that Labour Students will address the anxieties of our members before the constitutionally-mandated debate on affiliation next term.”

Monorail could present monetary problems for OUSU

0

OUSU president-elect L.J. Trup seems to have hit a pothole with one of his flagship policies to build a monorail. Investigations made by Cherwell into the financial and administrative feasibility of Trup’s proposed transport system suggest that the construction will not be able to go ahead without major financial backing.

Cherwell Deputy Editor Patrick Beardmore drew up a proposal for the monorail’s route (pictured) based on the system outlined in Trup’s ‘personifesto’. Using this as a blueprint, Cherwell obtained a quote for the potential costs of building a monorail. Jerry Sanders, CEO of SkyTran Inc. and associate fellow of the Said Business School, gave us this expense proposal and breakdown, “We could bring this in for under $85M all inclusive (stations, vehicles, candy bars). Roughly $10M a mile for guideway; $500K per station; and $25K per vehicle). This assumes no payment for the right of way or other government levies.”

Whilst this seems to be reasonably priced for a project as large as this, the expense would consume the whole of the OUSU budget for the next sixty-five years.

In another blow to Trup’s project, the Oxford City Council have expressed scepticism about the proposal and have even stated that they believe it would damage the city’s tourist reputation. They said, “It would be challenging, to say the least, to propose a monorail through the historic centre of the city without having an adverse impact on the world-famous beauty.”

The council have also ruled out the possibility that they could provide any funding and insisted that the project would require institutional backing. They dismissed the overall proposal as unnecessary, claiming, “Such major infrastructure projects are really only viable in very large cities.”

However, an economic analyst at Cherwell has noted that Trup’s proposal to downsize term-time by removing fifth week from the Oxford calendar would reduce overall university expenditure. The monorail would obviously be a long-term project, and the construction funds could be offset by the overall reduction of term time, which would reduce spending by 12.5 per cent. When factoring in projected revenue that the monorail would accrue, optimistic projections suggest it could be profitable within twenty years.

These projections do not take into account the positive effect that the monorail could have on Oxford’s tourism. In Orlando, Florida, the construction of a monorail (in conjunction with the development of a few Disney-based theme parks) has caused a huge spike in tourist revenue in what was formerly an area of desolate marshland.

Trup has risen to prominence on a wave of popular support not seen since Obama’s 2008 Presidential campaign, and it now seems he will face similar problems that the American premier has been forced to confront in recent months.

Like Obamacare, Trup’s monorail is an essential, but expensive, modernising process that would drag the city into the twenty-first century. However, sceptical technocrats and political points-scorers are determined to kill the project while it is still in its cradle, citing cynical budget concerns as unsurpassable.

Students boycott Thai Deputy PM

0

A group of Thai students are boycotting a visit by Deputy Prime Minister Phongthep Thepkanjana to Oxford this week in protest against a controversial bill proposed by the Thai government.

The Amnesty Bill is a heated piece of legislation that has provoked unrest, government debate, and street protests in Thailand for many months. The bill proposes to offer amnesty for acts of violent unrest carried out between 2004 and August of this year. This would apply to several disgraced political figures close to the current government, most notably the older brother of Yingluck Shinawatra, the current Prime Minister.

Deputy Prime Minister Thepkanjana, who has supported the Amnesty Bill despite fierce public opposition in Thailand, is set to meet Thai scholarship recipients at an informal lunch meeting on Saturday, 30 November.

However, a group of Thai students led by Thaya Uthayophas and Duangnapa Kovanich have raised objections to the terms of the Deputy Prime Minister’s visit. In an open letter to Thepkanja, they strongly condemned his government’s policies and declined his invitation to take part in the event.

“Contrary to the government’s tactics, we believe that a true democracy is not the same as  majoritarianism, that the voice of the minority, political decency, and the rule of law must be upheld,” the letter reads. “Therefore, we, the Thai students at Oxford University who oppose the Amnesty Bill, do not wish to have any involvement with your coming visit to Oxford.”

Thaya Uthayophas, a third year PPEist visiting Pembroke from Brown University, is one of the leading signatures of the open letter to Thepkanjana. He is optimistic about the political dialogue created by the protest in Oxford and elsewhere: “We believe our letter has been well received by the majority of Thai students at the University of Oxford and also some other members of the Thai community in Oxford and the UK,” Uthayophas told Cherwell.

“We hope that our boycott will prompt Thai students, both in Thailand and overseas, to be inspired to voice their opinions and engage in the greater political dialogue of the country.”

Thai students supporting the boycott have chosen not to protest the Deputy Prime Minister’s visit

for the sake of the Oxford Thai Society, which has no official political affiliations and does not represent Uthayophas and Kovanich’s group.

A first year MBA student at St Hugh’s expressed mixed opinions the visit, commenting, “I  personally welcome the man because I heard, from a reliable source, that he was fair and actually not a corrupt politician.

“But we cannot welcome the Deputy PM who tries to pass that Amnesty Bill that would destroy the rule of law in our country.”

Uthayophas expressed his disappointment that the Thai Office of Educational Affairs, which organised the Oxford lunch, did not specify that the Deputy Prime Minister would be attending.

“We believe that their omission, given the current political situation in Thailand, has led some students to make uninformed decisions,” he said.

Deputy Prime Minister Thepkanjana has not yet responded to the Oxford students’ open letter, nor was he available for comment.

Anger over Junior Deans’ dinner

0

A termly meeting in which junior deans are encouraged to “exchange war stories” has been condemned by welfare staff as “entirely inappropriate”.

The junior deans’ dinners, which began in Hilary 2013, are termly social events for deans to meet. Concerns have been raised after the email organising the Michaelmas meal described the event as “a time and space for junior deans to come together to confidentially compare experiences” and “trade war stories.” It continues, “Most importantly, this is done over a relaxed dinner and a fair few drinks.” The email was sent to all junior deans in the University.

A room was booked for the event to ensure “we have the privacy we’d need to discuss College issues.”

One anonymous dean, who revealed the event to Cherwell, condemned the events. “My opinion is that organising a social event around which to discuss these cases is entirely inappropriate. There is already a very well thought-out system in place by the University Counselling Service which offers a forum to discuss issues presented by junior deans in an official, secure and confidential environment.

“What seems to be lacking in this case is the understanding that colleges are small environments: maintaining confidentiality isn’t just about the withdrawal of names, it is about the withdrawal of information that could lead to the identification of the person or persons from the divulgence of information.”

They continue to describe the event as “wholly inappropriate”. They said,  Junior Deans “who are often entrusted with information of a sensitive nature”, should not be prepared to “to divulge this information ad libitum to peers outside of a formal structured setting.”

They went on, “I hope that university takes a strong approach to these ‘social’ events and recognises the potential for the breaches of confidentiality which may occur.”

The dinner is being held on the Tuesday 3rd December, and follows on from a drinks event at the St Aldates Tavern at 8pm on Wednesday 19th June.

The University, and the organisers of the event, did not respond to Cherwell’s request for a comment.