Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Blog Page 1457

Review: Reading Festival 2013

0

Reading Festival is Glastonbury’s kid brother in more ways than one. The Glastonbury Festival of Performing Arts is arguably the only UK festival bigger than Richfield Avenue’s offering; what’s more, the average crowd age of each reveals something more. Reading is the 16-year-old’s festival, and this year I was more aware of that fact than ever. As a faithful Reading Festival-goer of many years, I had no excuse for being annoyed at these young pretenders, as I had once been them myself. But I managed it anyway. Reading is my home festival, but it seems I have outgrown it.

But let’s focus on the music for a bit.

This year’s lineup certainly left much to be desired; Festival Republic must be seriously mistaken if they think they can follow 2012’s Friday and Sunday headliners, The Cure and Foo Fighters, with Green Day and Biffy Clyro. The former is a band so far from relevant it makes Rocky Balboa look 21st century, while the latter is a good band with some solid songs, but has a long way to go before it reaches the pedigree necessary to close Reading Festival. My hat is off, however, to the organizers for the inspired move that was bringing Eminem back to Richfield. The man is a true superstar with fans all across the UK, and a range of excellent material that was certain to set the Main Stage alight.

What’s more, the NME Stage really seemed to be set to excel itself this year. When the music began on Friday with a late-announced set by Dry The River, one could tell that Reading’s second stage was going to be the place to be. Even though Deap Vally were a little disappointingly bland, an excellent showing by FIDLAR a short while later showed that their brand of youthful insincerity was exactly what the GCSE/A-Level crowd at Reading needed. Peace were on next, and showed a new maturity alongside their usual joyful exuberance, producing a highly stylized performance on a plain white stage which included a stellar cover of Disclosure’s ‘White Noise’ with a verse from ‘Another Brick In The Wall’ thrown in for good measure.

But it was Bastille who stole the day, with a stunning performance during which Dan Smith’s voice was almost (but not quite!) drowned out by the roar of a crowd who knew every single word to every single track, whether from the album or an earlier mixtape. Sadly, all these bands suffered from a disastrously poor microphone which meant anything they said between tracks was completely unintelligible. Fortunately someone did something about it just before Major Lazer took to the stage, at which point some classic festival misfortune conspired to force me to miss both them and A$AP Rocky, two of the acts I’d been looking forward to the most. From what I can tell watching coverage afterwards, the phone I dropped somewhere in the NME tent had little chance of survival.

But the rest of the day was far from a complete loss. I headed to the Festival Republic Stage, where an enchanting set from CHVRCHES was followed by an exhibition of pure, unbridled and confusing fun when Crystal Fighters took to the stage. Sebastian Pringle, dressed like a disco ball, careered around the stage like a demented satellite on acid as the English/Spanish folktronica band finished the day in style. Billy Joe who?

Saturday produced less excitement in quantity, but made up for it in quality. Early on the Festival Republic Stage, new boys Drenge were magnificent, running through the highlights of their excellent debut album and infecting the whole tent with their barely-contained adolescent rage. Swim Deep were, against all expectations, disappointingly lacklustre; after a second-class debut they really needed to make their hits count, but even ‘King City’ failed to inspire the usual euphoria (though to be fair, the indie kids jumped around anyway).

Soon afterwards, Foals did exactly what everyone has said about them all summer, and stepped up to the plate on the Main Stage. They’ve come a long way since ‘Cassius’ (which they didn’t even play) and Yannis Philippakis  looks like he’s finally where he’s always belonged: at the top.

After that it was back to the NME Stage, where Tame Impala were, predictably, their brilliant selves. Using the TV screens for their own psychedelic light show, they produced an atmosphere of hazy, trippy wonder. Finally, it was the moment I’d been waiting for for months. The moment I was missing Eminem for. The band behind my album of 2012: Alt-J.

They were everything I could have hoped for and more, dispelling all rumours of disappointing live shows almost as soon as the opening chord of ‘Intro’ had rung out through the tent. The crowd was spellbound by every song from hit single ‘Breezeblocks’ to ‘Interlude 1’, including an exquisite acapella cover of College and Electric Youth’s ‘A Real Hero’. Keyboardist Gus Unger-Hamilton was the only member to break the spell, with carefully timed exhortations to the crowd, but lead singer Joe Newman didn’t say a word throughout, preserving the mystery and aloofness of his genius. Instead, his only communication with the crowd came as he was unable to hold back his emotions at the sound of thousands of people singing his songs back at him. The set ended with the show-stopping ‘Taro’, as fake snow was launched into the crowd and Newman hid his face as the crowd roared the chorus for him.

Somewhere in between all of this, Jake Bugg was awful.

Sunday was always going to be an anticlimax after two such amazing days of music, but Alunageorge did their best to buck the trend with a set of true quality on the NME Stage in the early afternoon, including a brilliant cover of Montell Jordan’s ‘This Is How We Do It’. Tribes were surprisingly empty, considering their usual love for festivals, but things perked up later on the Festival Republic Stage, where Spector headlined to an archetypically chaotic crowd with real aplomb. After this, defeated by the weekend’s exertions, I sat down to watch Biffy Clyro from the back. Against my expectations, nostalgia took over, and I even felt a rush of emotion as fireworks launched into the air during ‘Mountains’. If that was the last song I’ll ever hear at Reading Festival, it was a pretty good one. ‘Mon the Biff.

Eating My Way Across America

0

As my mum picks me up from Heathrow at 23:00 after a hellish 24 hour stint in San Francisco Airport, my stomach churns for some food – Marks & Spencer is closed; W H Smith’s selection of confectionary is tempting but then, the unavoidable hits me: the Drive-Thru McDonald’s on the way home. A pastime, nay a tradition, of stocking up here after a journey has developed in my family and so within what seemed like seconds I was clutching a quarter-pounder like there was no tomorrow. Something was wrong – was it too greasy? Not greasy enough? Had we forgotten French Fries? And then it hit me – I had been indoctrinated into the American Fast Food culture – chips were now French Fries and the idea that a burger a day wasn’t normal was a concept only worthy of my contempt. Every Subway, Burger King or KFC I passed in the next few weeks pushed me further towards desperation; seeing the fast food weight that I’d put on in America (approximately 10 lbs) slowly drop off me left me feeling wrong, even cheated. Why couldn’t I clutch my love handles with ease? Where was the love?

It was and is abandoned in the USA but it seems a shame not to describe the beauty and intricacy of the American Fast Food institution. 

We should start with the Mothership, the oh-so-beautiful-burger topped with cheese and perched coyly next to a slice of gherkin. “I’m bloody delicious”, it screams. American burgers are wonderfully to the point; there’s none of this “I’ll have a blue cheese and avocado burger with no bun”, just pure, simple hamburgers or cheeseburgers. However, there is often the choice of a double burger – these come in varying degrees of lush, either there is the double patty or the third bun and double patty combo… needless to say I wasn’t keeping tabs on calories. I was, however, ever conscious of my budget – a £10 GBK burger wasn’t really in my financial grasp – this turned out to be OK really with my favourite double cheeseburger from Five Guys dubbed “the best $5 burger a man can buy” by GQ Magazine. The burger market seemed to be a sort of classist system – there was a slight difference in prices but the level of service and quality was miles better in say In’n’Out burger than in McDonalds or Burger King. The East Coast/West Coast divide between Five Guys and In’N’Out was a hard one to judge so I settled on the conclusion they are equally beautiful culinary institutions. The famous Hooter’s was a great experience (I even bought a classic Hooters vest to my companions’ despair) and it was the only place that I couldn’t finish a burger (what a feat). It turns out that the ever so slightly misogynistic food parlor has a male counterpart, Dick’s. This was truly a disaster: we walked in and the waiter started explaining to us how Dick’s was all about “sarcasm” whilst he threw our menus on the tables. I wasn’t really sure which definition of sarcasm he was getting at but decided to embrace the restaurant’s “kooky” approach… what a mistake – the food was fine but the poor waiter’s annoying jibe of “come get your soda yourself” fell on deaf ears. I did feel quite bad as he looked as dejected by the whole experience as we were – I guess we just didn’t get his wit.

Each different city had a form of “Fast Food” that drew me, only momentarily, away from my burger fetish. I won’t go into the $1 slices of Pizza and footlong hotdogs from New York because I’m still mourning their absence in my life. However, there were many other cities that had worthy fast food – the first being Virginia Beach with its deep fried crab sandwich. When you think of a crab you think of snapping the pincers and scooping out the delicious white meat; this crab meal was quite a different affair. They had deep-fried the crab till the point of no return; its shell had disintegrated into the batter and even the pincers were edible. Although I would recommend trying this at least once, I wasn’t a huge fan and was left feeling a little bereft of a crab’s usual freshness and taste. Nashville’s BBQ pulled pork sandwiches, on the other hand, were quite a different story – one sandwich was enough to fill two hungry travellers but we were tempted to order another just for the taste. If you ever find yourself in Music City and want to try one of these head down to Union 417 and share it! We found that the portions in America were monstrous and could be split between two, especially at ‘Mother’s’ of New Orleans where they sold their famous “Ferdi Special” – this has to be the pinnacle of my non-burger foods… a “Po’Boy” sandwich filled with baked ham, roast beef, gravy and debris, which is the roast beef that falls into the gravy whilst it is baking in the oven – it sounds grim but it makes the meal. The sandwich was hard to fit into your mouth and when the waiter first slammed the plate on the table I thought that he’d given us double but no, it truly was a monster. Despite being horribly full I still managed to fit in one of Mother’s beautiful Pecan Pies – if you can stomach it, definitely try both.

The phenomenon that is the constant filling up of your “soda” was one of the best culinary revolutions to have hit the Western world – but why, oh why, has it not affected the UK. Apart from this the drink situation was fairly average, they have the same “soda” with some extras (Mountain Dew isn’t really something to shout about however) and wine can only be bought in Liquor stores so I ended up drinking a lot of Coors Light, which was described by many fellow Englishmen as piss-water (I secretly really liked it). Their milkshakes were far superior however  – but there was only one that brought boys to the yard and Kelis, it wasn’t yours – it was Jonny Rocket’s 780-calorie banana milkshake. Yellow in colour and so thick you can feel your arteries giving way with a scream of happiness. For over $6 it was a bit extravagant, especially as at that point I was living on a tenner a day but either way nothing could have been more worth it. 

If you want to enjoy some amazing American Fast Food in the comfort of your home nation, go to Covent Garden to the new Flagship “Five Guys” restaurant – you will not regret it. 

A Concrete Jungle: The US Open 2013

0

Friday night in New York City; on the eve of the final Grand Slam of the year, the former ATP #1s gathered for a night of celebration, remembrance and reverence. Amongst endless tedious soundbites and much champagne-bottle-popping, you could however detect an air of anticipation for the upcoming tournament, centred around three particular gentlemen – Nadal, Djokovic, and Federer.

Prominent among attendees was the much missed and recently retired Andy Roddick. The US Open, back in 2003, was the site of his only major triumph. With three consecutive aces, the enormously popular American clinched his place in tennis immortality. That’s what winning the US Open, in front of the lights and an adoring public, does – he was hailed as ‘the great new hope for tennis’. Unfortunately a certain Swiss turned up around the same time. Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Murray are back again in Flushing Meadows, having engineered an unsurpassed stranglehold on the sport since 2008. Yet, with Federer’s recent struggles – could we be speaking of the Big Four as one for the last time?

So, once more unto the breach – we can examine their draws. Djokovic has been drawn in Murray’s half, and David Ferrer with countryman Nadal. Federer has meandered down the rankings to #7, and lurks in wait for Nadal in the quarters. Djokovic is ruling the roost at the top of the draw, having occupied the #1 ranking for the past 44 weeks. Yet, the time has come to ask – how long will it last? He plays the tricky talent Berankis in the first round, and faces potential meetings with Dimitrov, Del Potro and Murray before he can hope to play the final.

Murray, too, has a rocky road. To face the serve and volleying Michael Llodra in the first round will be no walk in the park, and he will likely face the talented but tempestuous players Stanislas Wawrinka or Tomas Berdych in the quarters. Ferrer’s draw is difficult by default, bless him, because his 4-34 record against Federer and Nadal means he will not be reaching the final. As for Nadal, the only person who could trouble him before he would meet Federer would be the big serving American, John Isner; and then, when he gets to the quarters, will Federer even pose a real threat? Federer’s recent form, and experimentation with a new racket in the last few months, have made him seem lost, and even desperate. Were to beat Nadal, it would possibly be the greatest victory of his career, given that so few would have expected it.

Ideally, an unheralded player ought to break through and make their mark in the next two weeks. Unfortunately, the current generation of young talents is so woefully behind their predecessors at the same age that it is beginning to look increasingly unlikely that any of them will achieve anything of equal note at all. If anyone is to do it, look to the fourteenth-ranked Janowicz, who made Murray fans bite their nails at Wimbledon after he took the first set in their semi-final. The Other Swiss, Stanislas Wawrinka, is also interestingly poised to make a move in Berdych’s quarter – a player against whom he has a favourable record.

So, which of these will ultimately clutch the trophy in two weeks’ time? Del Potro suffered a gut-wrenchingly epic loss to Djokovic at Wimbledon. Yet, at the US Open four years ago, he beat Federer and Nadal back to back to claim the trophy. In Arthur Ashe Stadium, he may well regain his old fervour, make amends for Wimbledon and take out Djokovic in five heartpounding sets to reach the semi-finals. Murray will then gripe and grouch his way through a few difficult matches to reach the semis, and then the final.

Nadal will breeze into the quarters, whilst Federer will labour there, but that match should happen. Expect Federer to win the first set gallantly, be poised to win the second – then wilt, to be denounced as done, one more time. He won’t be – but that’s for another tournament. Nadal will meet Janowicz, who will have conquered the floundering Ferrer to reach the second Slam semi-final of his career. The Spaniard will win. Nadal and Murray have not played for two years – but I predict they will do so again to end this tournament, and Murray will not be defending his title.

The US Open has often felt particularly distant to all residents of the UK. The glorious night sessions usually take place at approximately 3am our time, and watching these matches sprawled sideways on the sofa, with occasional breaks for drooling and snoring, nullifies some of the thrill. However, that should not stop us. In the city where dreams are made, one more will come true in two weeks. 

Top Lunch Spots in Oxford

0

Freshers: in the first few weeks you’ll be tasting the delights of your college’s hall menu. Soon you’ll find yourself lusting after an artisan sandwich or just somewhere to get you away from your essay for an hour or so. Follow our sandwich-centric advice and you can’t go far wrong.

Covered Market:

The perfect central location to stop at on the way to or from lectures. Packed with shops and stalls that’ll happily lighten your wallet, it’s a challenge to separate the good from the bad.

Alpha Bar – choose between meat and veggie hot main courses, or a large selection of Make Your Own salads. Two salads, a spread and a ‘main’ (goats cheese, halloumi, chicken etc) will set you back between 3 and 4 pounds. It is definitely worth getting a loyalty card; if you think ten visits is unlikely (you’d be wrong there) you can always share it with a friend.

Fasta Pasta – mix and match sauces and toppings cooked to order that have a loose Italian theme. Fresh food served quickly, with a good selection of cured meats, cheeses and pestos.

Sit Down:

The Vaults – canteen service means you won’t have to waste time waiting when you’ve taken a break from the Rad. Cam. You can even sit outside on the patio and guiltily watch the library during Trinity!

Café Loco – always busy, close to the Aldates’ colleges and those studying music, and on the way to the river, it’s a good place to curl up for an hour or so.

Queen’s Lane Coffee House – perfect if you have a break between lectures at Exam Schools. The Café has a tempting brunch menu and also doubles up as a deli; the Turkish owner always has a selection of fresh backlava on offer.

The Nosebag – tucked away above a Thai restaurant on St Michael’s Street (opposite the Union), the Nosebag is homely, rustic and looks a bit like a ski chalet. Apart from a killer cream tea, you can also indulge in huge plates of salad and big bowls of soup for lunch.

Sandwiches to go:

Olives – There’s no seating area, the queue’s usually out the door and the ‘Baguette of the Day’ will put you back at least four pounds. But with some of the most exciting sandwich combinations and arguably the best antipasti selection in the city centre, sometimes you just can’t help yourself.

Taylor’s – With delis around Oxford (and two on the High Street) you’re never far away from a Taylor’s baguette. They’ll ply you with the best breakfast baps and their white chocolate cookies are to die for.

Mortons- with four shops in the city centre you’re also never far away from a Mortons’ baguette! They have a pretty good meal deal offer and cute seating areas upstairs in the Broad Street and New Inn Hall Street shops; frequent visits will leave you wondering why the Soup of the Day always seems to be mushroom.*

Heroes – there is a seating area but it’s only big enough for about four people. It’s also more expensive to eat in so it’s best to get your food to takeaway. They do a 10% discount for students and also have nice homemade cakes and biscuits.*

Alternative Tuck Shop – don’t be put off by the long queue at lunch time, with ‘alternative’ in the name it’s perhaps no surprise that lots of students flock there. Build your own sandwich right down to choosing from three different types of freshly baked ciabatta (try the sundried tomato).

*The Turl and Broad Street colleges usually have a fierce alliegance to one of these two shops. Where you go for lunch is as important as your choice of kebab van.

Debate: Is the Norrington Table ridiculous?

0

YESJoe Miles

The interest shown in the Norrington Table is entirely understandable in the context of evolutionary competition. Rivalry with other universities in national or international league tables is out of the question, given the stark refusal of most Oxford students to admit that the world beyond St Hugh’s (and most won’t even go that far) actually exists. Competing with Cambridge is limited mostly to the Boat Race, and “competition” in this context would wrongly imply that they would ever pose a serious challenge to Oxford as an institution. The collegiate system fortunately serves as a very useful outlet for our need for challenge. Given Oxford’s fundamentally academic reputation, it is no surprise that there is a struggle to be seen as the “best” college in terms of exam performance. It is not just enough to be a student at a world-renowned university – one has to be in a class of people better than most of the other students there too.

Yet as a performance metric, the Norrington Table is of little to no use. True, there are a few colleges that consistently perform well; Magdalen, St John’s and New College being pretty clear examples.  However, data produced by the Oxford Tab highlights just how little the Norrington Table tells us about relative college merits. The accumulated scores of the colleges over the past few years generally aren’t far apart. In other words, viewed over time, colleges really don’t tend to be that much better or worse than one another in terms of academic performance. If they are, then the Norrington Table data does not reflect this. Either way, this makes the table interesting but not particularly useful for judging the relative academic merit of colleges.

The most important reason of all, of course, is that Oxford isn’t a primarily academic institution. It also serves as a place where lifelong friendships (and enmities- especially at the Union) are born, and where a student can discover talents that they had never thought to explore. Much of this takes place outside colleges, so there’s no reason to suppose that choosing a college that the Norrington Table thinks is “good” will necessarily ensure that you take all that Oxford has to offer. The best advice that I can offer potential Oxford applicants is choose a college that makes you feel comfortable.

 

NOAnna Cooban

So LMH is ‘officially’ the stupidest college in Oxford. Or so the idea goes. You may have thought that those dull thuds were the sounds of the latest fracking initiative moving into your town, but they are in fact the sounds of LMH soon-to-be-freshers beating their heads listlessly against their walls, so distraught they are with the recently published Norrington Table. Some individuals may be genuinely wounded by their college’s position on the table, but for most the simple fact that they have beaten thousands of other bright sparks to wander these hallowed halls provides more than an adequate consolation.

It is hard to bash the Norrington Table and call for its abolition when many surely feel a warm, self-fancying glow when Oxford appears high up on the world university rankings. The Times World University Rankings 2012-2013 placed Oxford at number 2, just lagging behind the California Institute of Technology. Any more focused intra-Oxford ranking system does not seem quite so important when given this perspective. It is, however, hard to deny that a certain level of academic snobbery accompanies Oxford’s collegiate system and the Norrington Table can only exacerbate this power play, most of which is light hearted mockery, some of which does spring from a real belief that one college is intrinsically better than another.

Perhaps my apathetic view on college rankings springs from the fact that, as a proud Hughsian, my college hardly ever appears in the top half of the table – a listlessness reminiscent of Britain’s disinterestedness in the Eurovision Song Contest. If we’re not going to win, we may as well have fun laughing at all those who do win, and take it so seriously. Reducing an eminent Oxford college to the image of a Finnish ‘rock monster’ may help console those from the less prestigious colleges of their place in the table. I say we keep the Norrington Table, if for no other reason than to derive pleasure from the personification of New or Magdalen as a Robocop from the Eastern Bloc.  

 

Gibraltar: A post-colonial nightmare

1

Ever since Spain ceded Gibraltar to the British crown with the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713, this small British outpost on the southern coast of Spain has been a source of intense conflict between the two nations. Perhaps the most dramatic of these was the closure of the Gibraltan border in 1969 by General Franco, in a siege which was to last 16 years. 

The most recent dispute over Gibraltar’s 2.6 square miles of land, which has been developing over the past few weeks, is reminiscent of Franco’s days, but also shows a distinct lack of communication on both sides. 

The rise in tensions over the Rock this summer is largely the result of ongoing confrontations over fishing rights in the Bay of Gibraltar, involving a number of direct clashes between Gibraltarian police and Spanish fishing vessels over the past two years. The government of Gibraltar introduced a new set of environmental laws last year which prohibited the fishing methods used by Spanish fishermen, who have fished in these waters for generations. 

However, Gibraltar’s environmental credentials were shattered when they decided to immerse 70 blocks of concrete into the ocean on 24th July, creating an artificial reef which the Spanish claim is both damaging to local wildlife, and affects their access to fisheries which represent up to 25% of the local fishing industry.

In response, Spain began heavy border checks leading into and out of Gibraltar, announcing a heavy crackdown on tobacco smuggling – which increased by 213% since 2010 – and tax avoidance in the colony. Indeed, it is true that Gibraltar, with a business tax of only 10%, is effectively a tax haven. However, Spain’s declaration that “the party is over” did little to ease tensions.

The border checks, which at their height caused waits of up to seven hours at the border, whilst not illegal according to European law, are unacceptable. Not only have they led to an unnecessary escalation of tension, but they have caused irreparable damage to the contiguous Spanish town of La Línea, whose economy has been heavily harmed – some say with losses of up to 50% – by the border delays.

The rhetoric on both sides of the confrontation stinks of childish playground politics and a distinct lack of diplomatic tact. The article published last week in The Wall Street Journal by Jose María García-Margallo, Spain’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, in which he proclaimed that “Unlike the British government, the Spanish government is at ease in the context of international organizations, has full confidence in them, and is always willing to comply with their mandates” was a narrow-minded and ill-calculated analysis of the situation. 

The Spanish government’s hints of implementing a 50 euro “congestion charge” on the border, which they equated to the one implemented in London in 2003, together witj threats to close Gibraltan airspace and their call for a joint bid with Argentina in the UN are the kind of absurd sardonic provocations which are unlikely to solve the situation. 

On the British side, the decision to send out to Gibraltar the imposing HMS Westminster at one of the most heated moments of the crisis, regardless of whether it was previously planned, showed diplomatic tactlessness. The image, reproduced across the world, of the post-colonial power sending out a large warship to its protectorate certainly did little to improve Britain’s image abroad.

Neither does it help that Britain consistently refuses to negotiate the status of Gibraltar with the Spanish authorities. Sitting down to negotiations doesn’t commit Britain to returning the colony to Spain – far from it – but repeated refusals to do so conveys an image of unflinching British arrogance in the international arena. Despite his belligerent rhetoric, García-Margallo is in fact correct to point out that Britain have repeatedly ignored a number of UN resolutions by failing to sit down to a negotiating table with Spain. 

As Dennis MacShane has insightfully pointed out, this latest dispute is as much about domestic politics as it is about international relations. Indeed, the domestic situations of both David Cameron and that of his Spanish counterpart Mariano Rajoy, are not too dissimilar, and both Prime Ministers have tried to gain political capital out of the situation.

Appealing to the EU to resolve the standoff, an option which both sides have resorted to, is unlikely to settle the issues at stake. By European law, both nations are meant to be able to resolve the situation between themselves, whilst the slow bureaucracy of the European Union’s mechanisms will only delay a resolution to the conflict. In any case, previous attempts by the European Commission to mediate the dispute have proven unfruitful. 

If Britain wants to maintain sovereignty over Gibraltar, they need to stop giving Spain reasons to call for its return. It is unacceptable to have a territory under British authority which is home to opaque transactions and facilitates tax avoidance. It is equally intolerable for the Gibraltarian authorities to dump blocks of concrete in the Bay of Gibraltar, stopping Spanish fishermen from accessing waters which are contested by the Spanish authorities, and are vital to the livelihoods of hundreds of Spanish families. 

The British government has to cooperate with the Spanish authorities if these issues are to be resolved. Crucially, the British government must seriously consider whether such diplomatic crises, and the subsequent damage to Britain’s international image, are worth enduring for the sake of a couple of now strategically insignificant square miles and a large rock. 

Oxford – the Anti-Reading List

0

Pity the Freshers.

Sure, they’ve made their offers, gawked at reading lists, googled ‘Sub Fusc’, and had Aunty Barbara in Auckland cooing congratulations down the phone line. But they’re currently staring into an Oxford-shaped abyss, and as with any abyss, it’s a disconcerting feeling. They have no idea what lies ahead. Doom? Gloom? Twats-in-red-trousers, wantonly discriminating against anyone without a private income and a public school education? Sobrani-smoking, silk-dressing-gown-toting, self-described ‘eccentrics’? Or is it all with ancient manuscripts, moth-eaten cardigans, and stony-faced silence?

My advice is not to turn to literature for help.

Before arriving here, impressions of the city tend to be constructed of a hazy mixture of terrified interview memories and media stereotypes. It’s tempting to turn to the multitude of novels set in Oxford for clarity, to paint a coherent picture of what life here will be like. Don’t do this. They lie. Every author’s rose-tinted image of punting and port is just waiting to be shattered when you realise that, actually, life in Oxford is mostly normal. Give or take a gown or two.

So here’s an anti-reading list of the most dangerous examples of fictionalised Oxford – the books definitely not to read before your arrival.

 

 Brideshead Revisited (1945) by Evelyn Waugh

‘“I’ve got a motor-car and a basket of strawberries and a bottle of Chateau Peyraguey – which isn’t a wine you’ve ever tasted, so don’t pretend. It’s heaven with strawberries.”’

Let’s get the cliché out of the way. Evelyn Waugh’s magnum opus is the quintessential image of Oxford decadence, telling the tale of Charles Ryder’s embroilment with the Catholic, aristocratic Marchmain family, whom he meets through their Oxford undergraduate son, Sebastian. Though only the first part of the novel is set in Oxford, Ryder’s relationship with the fabulously wealthy, fabulously camp, fabulously alcoholic Sebastian has become a byword for the kind of champagne-quaffing hedonism that, even in darkest Christ Church, is rarely found in reality. Anyone caught carrying a pretentiously-named teddy bear is guaranteed a black eye by the end of Freshers.  

 

Jude the Obscure (1895) by Thomas Hardy

‘New Doctors emerged, their red and black gowned forms passing across Jude’s vision like inaccessible planets across and object glass’

Oxford’s access problem is, rightly, well documented. Even though only 7% of UK pupils attend private schools, 42.5% of Oxford’s 2012 Freshers were independently educated. In spite of all efforts to the contrary – and efforts are being made – its undergraduates are still almost universally upper-middle class. But read Jude the Obscure and realise how far we’ve come from Thomas Hardy’s day. His story of thwarted ambition and social prejudice centres around a working class Wessex lad, Jude Fawley, whose dreams of studying at Christminister (Oxford) are frustrated by his lack of fortune and formal education. It’s the novel that contains the most heart-wrenching misspelling in the English language – the ‘Done because we are to menny’ of Jude’s son’s suicide note – and even for a miserable bugger like Hardy, it’s very bleak. Avoid or you’ll arrive in Oxford feeling incurably resentful on Jude’s behalf. Just visit the Jericho pub named after it instead.

 

Northern Lights (1995) by Philip Pullman

‘Jordan College was the grandest and richest of all the colleges in Oxford… It had never been planned; it had grown piecemeal, with past and present overlapping at every spot, and the final effect was one of jumbled and squalid grandeur.’

To put it bluntly, real Oxford isn’t like Philip Pullman’s Oxford because Pullman’s Oxford is set in a parallel universe. Sorry. Unlike the one from which his protagonist Lyra sets out, we have no daemons, witches or armoured bears. We are not ruled over by a shadowy theocratic ‘Magisterium’ and there is no Final Honours School in Experimental Theology. We’ve got plenty of dust, sure, but no Dust. Start jabbering about General Oblation Boards and Miltonian conspiracy and find yourself quick-marched to the college counselling service and sternly instructed to stop with the substance abuse.

 

And these are only the three worst offenders. From Martin Amis to Alan Bennett, Inspector Morse to Zuleika Dobson, English literature is littered with depictions of Oxford’s ‘dreaming spires’. But spires don’t dream. They just attract flocks of tourists. As you sit on the pavement after your first Jaeger-sticky night at Bridge, trying to smoke a cigarette the wrong way round and crying because you dropped your cheesy chips, you’ll realise that the Oxford of fiction is precisely that – fictitious.

New takes Norrington top spot

0

New has been declared Oxford’s most academic college as it topped the preliminary Norrington table for this year. St. John’s came in second, up from 4th, whilst Merton, which has a strong record in the table despite a hiccough last year, took third place. Magdalen, the previous table-toppers, were pushed down into 6th.

At the other end of the table, LMH brought up the rear, followed by Somerville and Exeter, whilst Pembroke leapt up 15 places to 15th. Harris Manchester also rose dramatically, moving from 25th to 5th.

The Norrington Table was originally created in 1962 and ranks colleges according to finalists’ results, awarding 5 points for a 1st class degree, 3 to a 2:1 degree, 2 to a 2:2 degree, 1 to a 3rd class degree. The percentage expressed is calculated by dividing the total college score by the total possible score the college could attain (ie number of degrees awarded per college x score of 5).

Pembroke’s JCR Domestic rep told Cherwell he is “absolutely delighted by the new table, which finally reflects just how hard Pembrokians have been working to get those top degrees. From here, I can only see us heading in one direction: to the top!”

In the past, however, Oxford has advised that the results be taken with a pinch of salt, commenting, “It should be noted when interpreting the data that the number of students per college is relatively small and the rankings are therefore of limited statistical significance.”

The table in full is as follows:

1. New 78.02%                  

2. St John’s 76.30%                  

3. Merton 76.05%                 

4. Trinity 75.86%                  

5. Harris Manchester 73.60%                  

6. Magdalen 73.58%                  

7. Lincoln 72.67%                  

8. Brasenose 72.63%                  

9. Oriel 72.44%                  

10. Balliol 72.34%                  

11. Worcester 72.17%                 

12. St Anne’s 71.79%                  

13. Jesus 71.15%                  

14. Mansfield 71.00%                  

15. Pembroke 70.93%                 

16. St Edmund Hall 70.86%                  

17. Christ Church 69.52%                  

18. Wadham 69.37%                  

19. Hertford 69.33%                  

20. St Peter’s 69.05%                  

21. St Hilda’s 68.62%                  

22. St Catherine’s 68.59%                  

23. University 68.08%                  

24. St Hugh’s 67.93%                  

25. Corpus Christi 67.78%                  

26. Queen’s 67.13%                  

27. Keble 66.72%                  

28. Exeter 66.29%                  

29. Somerville 65.83%                  

30. Lady Margaret Hall 64.63%                  

Best 5 Sketches to See at The Fringe

0

The Pin 

Having seen Alex Owen carry the Cambridge Footlights a couple of years ago, I was quite excited to see him given control of his own double act – in tandem with Ben Ashenden. These two have already had breaks on BBC3 and ITV, and it is easy to see why; with Owen as the taking-himself-too-seriously straight man, and Ashenden as the nerdy, awkward foil, these two have a natural comedic chemistry that allows them to get the audience roaring with belly-laughs with only a minimum of traditional “sketch material”. The bits, genuinely amusing in their own right (Frank Lampard the thespian, over-politically correct exam questions); but it is the in-character fillers, with Owen venting his frustration at his partner’s Mr Bean-like incompetence, that really drive the laughs. A very funny show, and worth seeing.

 The Pin will be performing at Pleasance Courtyard until 26th August. Tickets cost £10. 

BEASTS

I was only able to catch this group for a 20 minute slot at a late night revue, but it is one of my regrets of the 2013 Fringe that I wasn’t able to see their full 60 minutes. These three had a very successful debut run in 2012, and return this year with plenty of buzz about their new material. The trio have a strong chemistry, with each of the rotating the high and low status roles, in what is perhaps a more traditional style of sketch comedy that The Pin. A lot of the material relies on slightly warped reproductions of childhood classics – an oikish pig geezer explaining his building nous to a big bad wolf, sullen Teenage Mutant Ninja turtles – sandwiched between quick one-line bits. The formula is not ground-breaking, but it is highly entertaining.

 BEASTS will be performing at Pleasance Courtyard until 26th August. Tickets cost £9.

Lead Pencil

Lead Pencil generated fantastic reviews for their debut show in 2012, and equally promising feedback from this year’s piece; I was understandably a bit surprised to find a few spare seats at the back of their Underbelly venue. The only possible reason I can conceive for this is that their show runs during the 1-2pm death slot, in which most of their target audience (i.e. anyone familiar with late 1990s mass culture) will still be conked out from a late night before. If you are feeling a bit muggy of an early afternoon, go and watch Lead Pencil; the sketches, which focus mainly on the fruits of our youth (Art Attack, crappy Nokias and the Fresh Prince), will tickle your nostalgic nerve as well as your sense of humour, and the whole show is performed with such incredible energy that you will leave the room feeling buoyed ahead of the rest of your day.

Lead Pencil will be performing at Underbelly, Bristo Square until 26th August. Tickets cost £9.50.

Cambridge Footlights

The Footlights have had a long and and happy relationship with the Fringe, and have become one of the best-known acts at the Festival. This year has seen them return once again to Pleasance’s Ace Dome, though I can safely say that their sell-out audiences are thanks to the strength of the 2013 material, and not trading on the Footlights history. This was probably the strongest sketch show that I saw at this year’s Fringe, with a fantastic mix of experimental sketches (“Press this button when the sketch should end”, “Here is a sketch menu” etc) and amusing running jokes; Matilda Wnek’s death machine saga carried the show. Wnek was just one of a core trio of brilliant actresses (alongside Rosa Robson and Emma Sidi) who, alongside the lovable Matty Bradley, provided a whole host of meomrable characters and scenarios.

 Cambridge Footlights will be performing at Pleasance Dome until 26th August. Tickets cost £9.50.

Oxford Revue

This year’s Revue was right at the other end of the spectrum from The Pin and the Footlights in terms of its presentation; no white back drop and plain uniforms, but a wonderfully cluttered set and eccentric outfits. The skits were equally quirky, and managed to extract the maximum laughter from a given scenario without ever taking it too far: a World War I soldier with cramp, a rather difficult birds and bees slideshow, a brilliantly honest primary school teacher. Perhaps the finest thing about this show is the quality of the transitions, with sketches fading into one another with a smoothness and precision that indicates an enormous amount of thought and hard-work in rehearsal. Watch out also for the running jokes, one of which concludes with a rather spectacular bang. Also, check out The Oxford Revue Presents: Toby Mather, for the best comic poetry this side of Tim Key.

The Pin will be performing at Underbelly, Cowgate until 25th August. Tickets cost £9.