Monday 23rd June 2025
Blog Page 1532

Balliol beat New/St Hilda’s in season opener

0

Balliol secured an emphatic victory over New/St Hilda’s in what was touted as an early season title-decider. In a repeat of last year’s Cuppers Final, New/St Hilda’s were barely ever in the contest after a devastating opening spell from the Balliol opening bowlers.

Anticipation for this fixture had been bubbling ever since Balliol’s defeat to New/St Hilda’s in last years Cuppers Final. But on a fine day that appeared befitting of a cricketing classic, New simply did not turn up. Even after the toss, there was a real sense of deflation, bordering on fear, as the New captain returned to inform his team that they had been put in to bat and would be facing Balliol spearhead, Robert Frome.

Frome and Alex Hawkins-Hooker, sensing vulnerability amongst the New/St Hilda’s batsmen, ripped through the top order, taking four early wickets. Frome – who eventually finished on figures of 4-14– unleashed a potent display of accurate swing bowling, knocking the stumps for all three of his early wickets. And the Balliol team responded to Frome’s success, creating a hostile atmosphere in the field and squeezing the batsmen into a defensive game. The visitors’ woes were only cemented when clueless debutant Leo Suter fell victim of a comical run out, which in many ways encapsulated New/St Hilda’s abject performance.

By the time Balliol introduced the chirpy South African pairing of Gavin Sourgeon and Alex Brczkowski the match had been taken away from the visitors. Brczkowski’s tidy off-spin contained any attempts to transfer the pressure onto the visiting team, while Surgeon – still a bit rusty after the winter break – proved his eternal class, picking up three wickets.

The most remarkable moment of the match came when a Sourgeon delivery clipped the top of the stumps only for a stubborn pair of bails to somehow remain in place. Such fortune, however, could not prevent New/St Hilda’s post- ing a disappointing final score of 61 – extras being the single greatest contributor to the first innings total.

In response, Balliol encountered little difficulty in chasing a total that was a mere formality for such an experienced batting line-up. Marcus Maxwell hit an expansive 23 before being trapped LBW, but a steady partnership between Hawkins-Hooker and Rob Wight ensured an eight-wicket victory for Balliol, des- patching some lacklustre bowling along the way.

After the match, Alex Hawkins-Hooker spoke of his satisfaction at Balliol’s crushing victory. He told Cherwell, “Having lost to New (and St Hilda’s) in an agonisingly close-fought nine wicket defeat in last season’s Cuppers final, we were desperate to take some revenge. Our opening bowler and talisman Rob Frome made his already legendary run-up thirty yards longer, and it did the trick as he cleaned up the top order with a devastating spell. All in all, I’m happy with what I thought was a very professional team performance.”

“Special praise, however, must go to the New number ten who showed prodigious control, skill and delicacy in deflecting the ball at good speed onto his own bails – at exactly right angle to leave them totally unmoved. I’ve never seen anything like it.”

After such a convincing performance Balliol have made a decisive statement of intent as they look to assert a stranglehold over the league and defend their title. With a wide crop of talented players and an inspired Rob Frome, Balliol certainly look like strong contenders for a League and Cup double. Whatever happens in coming weeks. This certainly promises to be an exciting college cricket season.

Blues excel in Marathon Varsity

0

Some of Oxford’s best athletes competed against Cambridge in the Varsity Marathon, incorporated into the Virgin London Marathon. Despite some high profile injury withdrawals from the Oxford team in recent weeks, both sides lined up with some extremely strong and experienced runners.

In the men’s event, things were agonisingly close from start to finish. With five runners to score from each side, all ten scorers ran well to post times under the three-hour mark. Unfortunately, Cambridge nicked it by the smallest of margins in the end with an aggregate time of 14 hours 5 minutes 4 seconds to Oxford’s 14:09:26 – there were just 4 minutes in it.

Special mention must go to Chris Hartley who showed the younger competitors how to do it by being the first man home with an impressive 02:41:21, placing him 209th overall and 17th in his age category.

Other notable performances came from Rob Noble and Chris Starkey, who both achieved top four finishes with times of 02:44:14 and 02:46:08 respectively.

In the ladies’ event injuries on both teams meant that there were just two to score for the match. Marie McHugh and Rachel Cassidy put in solid performances to soundly beat the Cambridge girls by over 11 minutes, despite both overcoming some significant difficulties in the final miles. McHugh of University College recorded the quickest time of 03:39:22.

The results represented a big improvement from the Cross Country Club’s performance in December, where both teams were defeated at Wimbledon Common.

Neil Riley from the Oxford University Cross Country Club commented, “Hopefully we can build on this as a platform to dominate marathon running in the years to come.”

The British Universities & Colleges Sport (BUCS) Marathon 2013 is decided from taking the placings of students who have entered the race. All scored well, but Marie McHugh (7th) and Chris Hartley (5th) not only contributed to the Varsity victory but also were highly impressive nationally.

Overall 41 male and 17 female students competed in the BUCS Marathon 2013, the highest number of competitors ever in the competition.

OUCCC is a large and popular club, catering for runners of all abilities and experiences, from international athletes to those who want to pick up running at university. The 123th Varsity Match will take place in December 2013.

 

 

Greyhounds put down

0

Oxford Greyhounds suffered a 27-9 defeat at the hands of Chinnor 2nd XV to pull up agonisingly short in their first Oxfordshire Cup since 1979. A hard-fought game was tight for 50 minutes before the power of Chinnor allowed them to defeat the University 2nds outfit at Iffley Road.

With this competition residing during the last period of the OURFC’s cycle, the Greyhounds featured a large number of individuals who had not played many games together. This was perhaps one of the reasons for a poor start, with Chinnor scoring just 90 seconds into the game. An excellent chip-kick by the fly half was met by a perfectly timed run by centre Powell.

However, the Greyhounds rallied and got a foothold in the game. Sam Egerton was one of the highlights of a low scoring first half, making incisive runs around the ruck. Centre Phil Bell converted their pressure into points, nailing two of his four penalty conversion attempts to make the score 7-6 at the half time break. The University team were a little frustrated not to have made more of two yellow cards for Chinnor players in comparison to one for Hounds flanker Will Fell.

Chinnor arrived into this tie as clear favourites, and showed why with dominant forwards display in the set pieces and the rucks. The Greyhounds didn’t have an answer to the pressure and dominance of the Chinnor pack, and on the back foot they conceded a further try when centre Tristian Corpe capitalised on a ferocious drive forward.

Five minutes later the game was all but decided by another Chinnor try. 44-year-old Simon Matthews crashed over for a rare try after his pack dragged him over the line, much to the jubilation of the fans in the Main Stand.

The Greyhounds can take credit from their response to these setbacks, putting immediate pressure on the Chinnor line but being forced to settle for another penalty by Phil Bell, taking the score to 21-9.

A final powerful drive by the Chinnor pack sealed the victory, allowing winger Harry Hillier to dart over. A last minute penalty sealed a disappointing defeat for the Greyhounds.

Chinnor 2nd XV have now gone the entire season unbeaten – an incredible record of 25 out of 25 wins and an amassed points total of 1013. The opportunity to test themselves against such physically powerful opposition was great experience for the Greyhounds squad, and even after the loss there is no reason to not expect a potential win in the future. 

Coaches need to focus on mind over matter

0

We all know a good coach. Whatever sports we may or may not do, there’s always someone who made us good at something. What’s less obvious is why someone is good at making other people good. Having announced his plans to leave Real Madrid, every interview has become another chance for Jose Mourinho to flutter his eyelashes in the direction of England’s biggest clubs. As a coach, he has brought unbridled success everywhere he’s been – although it’s worth noting that as of yet, he has failed to bring the Champions League to either Chelsea or Real Madrid.

But how do you define a ‘good coach’? What do the likes of Mourinho, Sir. Alex Ferguson, Sir. Clive Woodward or Sir. David Brailsford have in common (apart from in the case of the latter three, a knighthood)?

Some coaches swear by an analytical system, focused on ‘Prozone’ and statistics, whereas others are more concerned with motivation and management, others still obsess about tactical and strategical minutiae. The thing is, year-to-year, sport-to-sport, different approaches win out. Stuart Lancaster’s back to basics stance, focused on discipline, has brought recent improvements to the English Rugby Union team, but, to look to Cricket and Cycling as two examples, Andy Flower and Brails- ford have pushed the boundaries of “sports science”, to great effect.

In reality cycling proves an interesting case study, with the likes of Sir Bradley Wiggins (yet another knighthood – is this a pattern?) and Victoria Pendleton having been subject to countless tests of things as obscure to the layman as their ‘VO2 levels’. It would be hard to argue with the fact that this approach works, but then if we consider football for example it’s easy to find teams such as Harry Redknapp’s Tottenham who thrived on particularly old-school foundations.

So what exactly makes a good coach? It’s clearly not simple as their approach. Every other week the sporting press heralds another ‘new Mourinho’, or ‘new Guardiola’, whilst this season’s travails of last year’s Premier League Manager of the Year, Alan Pardew, show just how fickle the business of management is. Of course various sporting clubs and codes utilise different models of hierarchy too, with most of continental Europe united behind a system of ‘Sporting Directors’ which attracts derision whenever mentioned in the UK.

It begs the question of how much coaching matters at an elite level. Every time a football manager is sacked, his successor invariably complains about the low fitness of his players, something which in the professional sphere simply can’t be true. Surely these sports stars should be motivated enough, and good enough already?

The thing is though, the best coaches don’t just tell you what to do, when to run about, or how to train. They make the little adjustments. They all seem to have a vision. The difference made by Ivan Lendl to Andy Murray’s game over the last year is supposedly down to, in large part, a more certain mental approach instilled by the uncompromising Czech, and the key aspect of success as a coach appears to be along those lines: you need to be one hell of a talker.

Which brings us back to Mourinho. Despite the ironic inability to shake off his old Barcelona nickname of ‘the translator’, he is all about the show. Who can forget his inimitable Chelsea press conferences which sounded more like shopping lists or recipes than football talk? The man, along with a litany of successful coaches undoubtedly possesses out of this world communication skills. In fact, it’s hard to name a coach in any sport who hasn’t followed that pattern, to a greater or lesser degree. Any great manager is a great salesman, because when you run that extra five kilometres in the rain on a soggy field, you need to really believe that it’s worth it. 

 

Jammin to… ‘Apricot’ by Basil Hogios

0

Originally the soundtrack for the short-film, Apricot, this Basil Hogios instrumental sounds exactly as you would expect from its title: as sweet and soft as that orange-yellow fruit with its velvety skin. It is easy to understand why Briand chose Hogios as his film’s sound artist: it is a truly soporific sound, rendered both emotive and evocative through its mix of the traditional and the more studio produced. You wouldn’t have thought it but Latin seems to sum up the song’s effect perfectly, with the adjective ‘apricus’ meaning ‘exposed to the warmth of the sun’, ‘in a sunny spot’, and the verb, ‘apricari’, meaning ‘to sunbathe’. And indeed, for a brief 1 minute and 35 seconds you are tricked into believing that your life is a peachy existence of spending whole days lying in the warm sun, and not the reality of sitting inside, staring at the word count on your laptop. Yet, as the music slows further in the last ten seconds it sounds as though Hogios too knew that reality was not so, that the season for the orange-yellow fruit was not forever, and that the orange-yellow sun will always eventually set. Nevertheless, for those fleeting 95 seconds, I am capable of convincing myself otherwise, as I am sure you could do too.  Of course, it only lasts 95 seconds – but there’s always the repeat button.

 

Daft Punk in a funk

0

It’s been twenty years since Daft Punk formed, and their latest single – a collaboration with Pharrell Williams of N.E.R.D. fame – shows the age of both parties involved.  ‘Get Lucky’ starts exactly as it ends, and very little of interest happens in between.

The disco groove established by Chic’s guitarist Nile Rodgers and the rhythm section, complete with old-skool hand claps on beats two and four, sounds like a throwback to the 90s.  In fact, the track as a whole feels like a pastiche of Travelling Without Moving-era Jamiroquai.  However, the forceful vocal performance of Jay Kay – or even of Pharrell Williams – is nowhere to be found.  His performance is surprisingly bland, and his voice comes across as uncertain, with an uncharacteristic fragility to it, perhaps due to the lack of rhythmic impetus in the rest of the song; a common feature in his previous projects.  Even his trademark “Huh” after the opening “like the legend of the phoenix” sounds forced and self-conscious.

The lyrics themselves are also remarkably unimaginative.  In the chorus, Williams sings: “We’re up all night ‘til the sun / We’re up all night to get some / We’re up all night for good fun” and although the title line “We’re up all night to get lucky” sounds tacky the first time, its excessive repetitions border on the annoying.  Although lyrical variety has hardly been one of Daft Punk’s strengths in the past (“Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger” is a case in point), the lack of vocal intensity – or any intensity aside from in Rodgers’ guitar playing – reduces the already banal, misogynistic lyrics to a subterranean level.

That Daft Punk were even involved in this single at all would have been anyone’s guess until over halfway through, when the French duo decided to whip out their trademark synthesisers and vocoders, but the effect is again one of pastiche.  The difference is that they are pastiching themselves from twenty years ago.  As is the case with many groups who last longer than their pre-allocated minutes of fame, they have become their own cover band.

More disconcertingly, this track has made it to the number one spot in the charts.  It is an island in the ocean of mediocre, over-dynamicised chart music that is paradoxically enjoying commercial success because of its complete lack of dynamic interest; a “breath of fresh air” as Fatboy Slim has called it.  Maybe this single’s success tells us more about the metaphorical air we have become used to than it does about the quality of Daft Punk’s latest offering.

Local Elections: Mad Hatter Interview

0

Local council elections will take place across the country this Thursday, and the election campaign is well underway. Oxford is divided into 24 Wards, each of which elect two councillors to represent them on the City Council. Currently, the Oxford City Council is made up of 27 labour, 13 Liberal Democrat 5 Green and 1 Independent councillor. 

However, this week Cherwell spoke to the Mad Hatter, a local tour guide hoping to be elected as the first Monster Raving Loony Party candidate in Oxford. Enouraging voters not to be taken in by “tweedle dee and tweedle dum”, the Mad Hatter’s controversial policies include replacing the Oxford skyline with teapots and forcing every single person in Oxford to marry a foreigner. 

Debate: Can your tutor also be your friend?

0

YES! – Alexander Rankine

Dear tutor,

Although we once met in the pub after a scheduling fiasco, I think it is fair to say that we are not really friends. We might occasionally share a dash of mirth
during the grim and earnest tutorial grind, but we’re careful to laugh about something safe; preferably the weather, a minor mishap, your rival’s most cherished theory. I now see that starting our relationship out by questioning the intellectual basis and credibility of your subject in my first ever tutorial was probably not very wise.

There are certainly a great number of bridges to cross as we try to rebuild our amity. We are separated by years and intellect. But then, by the end of 6th form we were often quite pally with our teachers, sharing gossip and meeting them out of lessons, and promising to stay in touch. Of course, the Oxford tutor poses their own particular difficulties. Some of you are just a bit strange, with touchingly circumscribed extra-subject conversation, profoundly alternative senses of humour, or a pronounced and intolerant dogmatism. But real human hearts beat under most of those priggish suits and ill-chosen denim jackets, just as they do under the elbow patches which are now worn – confusingly – mostly by the student body. And you yourself seem like quite a nice sort, with a good variety of interests and cultural references hinted at in our tutorial conversations.

But how can we get to know you better? Well, if fresher’s week teaches us one thing, it is that alcohol is the ticket to instant friendship (or a three-year long avoidance of certain other members of the college community).College is certainly willing to provide here, what with its entertainment allowance.

After we had dinner together in the SCR you even suggested that there might be enough left over in the kitty for a whisky tasting night. Indeed, I saw you drunk (at fresher’s formal) before I ever saw you teach. Bring on the booze. I believe that Tolkien used to hold tutorials in the pub, this too might be a way to go.

But no booze-broken-ice can stay melted for long without mutual respect. I now recognise that brazenly attacking an academic’s position during your tutorial whilst repeatedly failing to correctly pronounce his name was a daft position to take with your thesis supervisor. To the contrary, I now regard his theory as a shining paradigm of reason and sense.

Equally, the next time my tutorial partner sticks his head out the window, it would be nice if you did not threaten to slam it shut. A little guillotining between friends can do a great deal of harm. Your acts of kindness also seem like a nice way of building up trust between us, giving us pringles to explain maximisation problems was inspired, even if I did eat the relevant study tool before you could explain the theory.

Ultimately, friendship must be based upon shared interests. I already see hints of these, like the time we carried on our tutorial in the quad after the ‘official’ end. Offering us one of the roll-ups you smoked during our chat would be the next step, but it was nice to see that not every conversation with a tutor need conclude with awkward silence.

Here’s to a new friendship,

Alex

 

NO! – Anna Cooban

True friendships do not spring suddenly into existence, they take time to develop and certainly cannot be nurtured during the course of a one-hour tutorial discussing Darwinian theory and the numerous pitfalls of my essay.

Friends are your literal crutches on the long journey from bop to bed, friends upload horrendous photos onto Facebook and kindly remember the tag, lend you money at dinner when your bod card balance runs low and provide the simplest of comforts.

Would my tutor turn up at my room at 3am armed with a tub of Ben & Jerry’s because my boyfriend dumped me? No. Any friend who treats you as an
academic punch-bag at the beginning of every term is simply not worth keeping. Collections are perhaps the bane of every Oxford student’s life, turning every vac into a six-week-long procrastination where relaxing is something of a luxury and not an expectation.

Socialising with your tutor in the weeks that follow when your collections papers are still unmarked, underscores any dinner or drinks event with a palpable tension and fear of the dreaded email asking for a ‘chat’.

Friends also have a habit of mincing their words to protect your feelings and often the best advice has the harshest delivery. Half-baked criticism for a truly shoddy essay is helping no one and sometimes being told that you’re crap is the most helpful and truly motivating thing you could ever hear. Friendships, like relationships, are supposedly based on honesty, but in practice the white-lies told by friends are designed to spare you heartache where it is needed.

Instead, the brutal, bare-faced honesty of a tutorial report gives you heartache where it is most certainly needed. This is why OxCORT exists – to shatter any illusion that your tutor was ever, or could possibly become, your friend.

Perhaps it is Facebook and the entire social networking phenomenon which has made ‘friendship’ seem so easy. The simple click of a button enables people with even the most tenuous connection to instigate a virtual ‘friendship’ without the rigorous tests set by physical proximity. These sorts of Facebook friends cannot pull your hair back after a heavy night at Camera, nor can they file away embarrassing anecdotes from fresher’s week to be dragged up when you’re about to sit your finals. Tutors are like these nominal virtual friendships; they show cordiality and respect – the equivalent to a ‘like’ on a profile picture – but in reality they are just as distant, just as indifferent and just as anonymous as the 500+ friends on your timeline. 

And if you think this view of the impossibility of tutor-student friendships is dismissive to those who genuinely do feel as if their tutor would distract them from their work to play pool in the JCR or would scrutinise all potential love interests as unworthy of their time, then, for your sake, I urge you to end this destructive relationship now. Once finals come around and you graduate, the tutorstudent dynamic will be broken and you will wonder why you invested so much energy in the friendship of a middle-aged don with whom, aside from a shared love of 19th century lesbian literature, you actually share very little in common.

Do not feel disheartened at the loss of your tutor’s seeming friendship – you could always add them on Facebook.