Saturday, May 17, 2025
Blog Page 1541

Students complain of "foul odour" at Wahoo nightclub

0

Patrons of Oxford’s Wahoo club had their nostrils assaulted by a decidedly unpleasant aroma on the night of Friday 22nd February.

Students attending the popular Friday night venue were surprised to find the upper floor of the club pervaded with a smell that has been likened to a pungent form of foam, mouldy fish and even death.

First year biologist and eye-witness (or should I say nose-witness) Emilie Brignall tried to describe the smell for Cherwell, saying, “It was definitely a smoke machine, or a foam machine, or perhaps death. It was not pleasant.”

Chris Jenkins, a first-year Keble student, went on to describe it further, stating, “Seriously, the smell in the men’s toilets was preferable to the smell upstairs. It was an insidiously foul odour, but fortunately it was somewhat drowned out by the smell of liberally applied aftershave.”

Pete Mortimore, General Manager of Wahoo, was on duty on the evening in question. When contacted by Cherwell, he said, “I can assure you that this is the first of this ‘odd smell’ that I have been made aware of. A thorough investigation will take place.

“I would like to state that we are extremely pro-active in ensuring that all of our customers have a good experience at the venue and ask that if anyone has a complaint and or comment that they would like to pass on then they should do so on the evening so that we can rectify in a timely fashion.”

The smell did cause some confusion amongst students, with physicist Sam Badman thinking the club was serving food. He explained, “No one had told me so but I assumed it was just fish and chips Friday. If that really was the case then I’m still waiting on the chips and the fish definitely smelt mouldy.”

Oxford resident and PPEist Emma Alexander claimed that Wahoo will remain a favoured night spot. She said, “I’m sure this was an isolated incident. Wahoo is generally much appreciated by Oxford students and I for one sincerely hope that it has returned to its usual fragrant self by this Friday!”

Hertford student India Miller had a slightly more critical view, however. She said, “I for one was very disappointed that the subtle notes of vodka and BO that are normally the perfect accompaniment to a night out were swamped by the overwhelming smell of fish. In fact, if they want to retain my patronage, Wahoo really need to get their act together: it’s a sink or swim situation.”

Student assaulted in Jericho

0

CONCERNS have recently been raised about the safety of students in Oxford, after an Oxford University student was assaulted.

The attack happened in the early hours of the morning, on 17th February. A press report issued by Thames Valley Policy stated, “The victim, a 21-year-old woman, was walking along Walton Street at about 3.49am when she was approached by a man, who dragged her into a nearby alleyway.”

Investigating officer Det. Con. Darren Pomroy, of Local CID in Oxford, said: “This was clearly a very frightening ordeal for the victim, but she showed great bravery in fighting the man off, and thankfully she was unharmed. A man heard the victim’s screams and came to her assistance after the offender had run off.”

Efforts have been made to try to raise awareness of the importance of safety amongst students. Suzanne Holsomback, the OUSU VP for Women, told Cherwell, “Night safety is an important issue and the Thames Valley Police worked diligently at the beginning of Michaelmas to raise awareness of how to keep your belongings and self safe in Oxford, especially if this term was your first time away from home or in another country. The effort from somecolleges is great and I hope more do so. I would recommend keeping the focus on real statistics and information.

“Much night safety information tells women in particular, ‘don’t get raped!’ This is victim blaming and it ignores that we do not tell perpetrators, ‘don’t rape!’

“Most sexual assaults are by people the survivor knows. It is more likely to be assaulted by your partner or an acquaintance than a stranger hiding in the bushes. The National Union of Students Hidden Marks report says that the majority of women who experienced serious sexual assault while at university were attacked in someone’s home.

“I think night safety needs to include discussions about sexual consent as well as sexual abuse (non-violent acts to violent acts) and domestic abuse, so all genders can feel safe in their homes and while socialising at night.”

Several colleges, including Keble and LMH, have sent emails out to students warning about the potential dangers which students face when out at night.

Benedict Hardy, a student at Somerville College, said, “I’m sure the colleges sending these emails out handled it very sensitively, but it’s somewhat condescending to suggest that anyone being attacked wasn’t already taking every precaution possible not to be attacked.”

However another student from Balliol College argued that the emails sent to students would have a positive effect, telling Cherwell, “I think that it’s good that some colleges are warning students to be careful in Oxford. Although it’s never ever the victim’s fault if they get attacked, I don’t think that warning students to be careful and walk home together is victim blaming.”

The police are appealing for any witnesses who saw the attack to come forward and contact Det. Con. Pomroy via the 24-hour Police Enquiry Centre on 101,, or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Irish students at Oxford doubled over last decade

0

The number of students from the Republic of Ireland at Oxford has almost doubled over the past decade, Cherwell has found.

The Sunday Times reported that the total number of Irish students at Oxford and Cambridge had increased twofold between 2001 and 2011, from 213 to 448.

In Oxford specifically, the number of those domiciled in the Republic has risen from a total of 67 in 2001 to 135 in 2012.

The main driver has been an increase in postgraduate enrolments. While there are 31 undergraduates in 2012 compared to 27 in 2002, numbers undertaking graduate study have jumped from 40 to 103 in the same period.

First year St Catz linguist Niamh Furey, an Irish student from Derry/Londonderry in Northern Ireland, suggested, “Improved crossborder relations may have exposed more Irish students to the UCAS system, which is commonplace in the North. But I would say that Ireland’s youth has adapted to the country’s economic state: for me, Oxford’s opportunities and better funding relative to the Dublin universities were a deciding factor.”

Other Irish students in Oxford expressed varying degrees of surprise. Jennifer Ní HÉigeartaigh, a Dubliner and third year PPEist at St John’s, described the figure of 31 undergraduates as “shocking”.

Second year Somerville PPEist Zoe Fannon, from Cork, said, “Given that Ireland is so close to the UK, has a strong historical connection with it, and is an English-speaking country, 31 students of 54,344 sitting the 2011 Irish schoolleaving exam is not very many.”

Free higher education, with a small registration cost, was the case in Ireland until 2011. It was replaced by a student contribution – in effect a fee – which stood at €2,250 (£1,810) in 2012/3.

Ní HÉigeartaigh suggests the new system “is probably decreasing the gap in upfront costs and making students more likely to consider [the UK] than they were when Irish universities were free.”

Nieouamh Burns, a first year philosophy and German student at New College, said, “I would have expected the increase in fees [in the UK] to put a lot of people off – doing an undergrad at Oxford is much more expensive than at TCD [Trinity College Dublin]. In my Dublin state school we rarely spoke about coming to study in the UK. The brightest students in my school didn’t even consider coming to Oxford; I was the only applicant.”

Fannon concurred, explaining, “It just doesn’t occur to a lot of people that they could go to the UK, let alone Oxbridge. I don’t remember seeing much recruitment by UK universities in Cork at least.”

Ed Nickell, president of CraicSoc, a society for Irish and Northern Irish Oxford students, also noted, “Personal experience has shown that the majority of Irish and Northern Irish students come from a small number of top schools, especially from grammar schools in the North. We need to think not just in terms of getting Irish students, but students from a wider variety of educational backgrounds.”

Review: The Laramie Project

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

Interviews with locals in the aftermath of the real-life murder of gay-hate crime victim Matthew Shepard in Wyoming form The Laramie Project. Moisés Kaufman’s script questions the impact, or lack of, that the murder has had on the community in this tight piece of verbatim theatre – that’s documentary style theatre to you and me. 

The script is slick, the cast of eight rapidly flip between an astonishing sixty characters. Yet it doesn’t come into its own until the end of the first act. The rest of the act offers background on the case that’s interesting, but far less thought-provoking than the questions of homosexual attitudes that make up the second. Directors Benita Tibb and Lucy Shenton decide for there to be no set, with the only props being some torches and a tape player. On entrance into the theatre, the audience are faced with an imposing line of actors at the top of the raked seating, staring down at us and emphasising how we are the audience of a play in a Brechtian style. The rapid movements of the cast between interviews, from the gallery to the stage where we were sat, were polished and clearly heavily rehearsed. It would have been easy to stage the play with the actors in a line, flicking between characters as they recited different interviews. But this innovative and well refined staging helped both the character transitions and created different levels of intensity and a physical hierarchy. 

With so many characters to play, as a whole the actors managed to cope well. American accents did tend to drift from time to time, and the odd awkward pause in the midst of rapid and snappy dialogue made it obvious that someone had forgotten a line, yet this was the first night in an unquestionably challenging play. The absolute standout performance came from James Kitchin, seamlessly slipping from character to character and astonishingly managing to portray the most emotional scene from the play – Matthew Shepard’s father speaking to the courtroom – but keeping the audience at a distance that made them look at the bigger picture. Is the death penalty appropriate? Why there are such hate crimes? How do we overcome such prejudices? 

This was by no means a perfect opening night and fatigue seemed to start to creep in for the cast midway through the second act, yet any weaknesses are made up for by the eventually absorbing story and the unique and exciting staging from the directors. It’s definitely worth going to see if just for that.

Review: The Cherry Orchard

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

Of course, one goes in to a production like this slightly apprehensively. Chekhov is a difficult one at the best of times and a student production – with a student translation, I might add! – could easily turn out to be two and a half long hours of bad theatre. In fact, what I witnessed at The Cherry Orchard was a carefully staged, thought-out and well-cast production.

The casting choices seem to have been made with care, with each actor being able to carry off their character, if not with ease, then certainly successfully. Each character in Chekhov is equally important in their unimportance, each represents a demonstration of the human inability to change anything. The cast manage this admirably by being able to focus the attention of the audience on them when they must, then fade into the background when another character rises to the proverbial spotlight. Lyubov’s (Fiona Johnston) oscillation between despair and intense childishness quickly becomes the central part of the play it should be, without undermining any of the others.

The atmosphere is established from the very beginning, as live music guides the audience into the theatre and the two opening characters are already onstage, creating the scene. The set is elaborately done, with the contrast between dusty relics and carefully arranged photographs and paintings being an interesting and sensitive choice. The lighting is also used to mould the tone of the piece and it is taken advantage of suitably, by recreating changes in the day as well. It also allows the second act to begin with a bang which, to anyone having any doubts as to whether they are enjoying themselves in the interval, disperses them and prepares them for an enjoyable second half. 

They say to translate is to own and interpret, and to an extent this is visible. However, there were some cases where perhaps the directing was trying a touch too hard to make it modern or fun, and some of the original feeling was irrevocably lost. An important example is Varya (Katie-Rose Comery). What I originally – erroneously – wrote off as bad acting, was in fact, a directorial instruction to turn the sombre, deeply religious adopted-yet-abandoned sister into a flirty, confused thing. This almost ruined the ending for me, and confused some around  me who were not as familiar with The Cherry Orchard to begin with. 

The Cherry Orchard is something between an elegy for the past and an ode to stubbornness. This is certainly put across in every way, cast, stage and script. Despite some drawbacks and – at times – confused directorial choices, it is a play worth seeing for those who are familiar with the work and newcomers alike.  

Review: Arcadia

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

If there were ever a play to suit an Oxford audience, this would be it. Stoppard’s content, style and comedy all fit our intellect and quirky, if not extremely arrogant, charm. Be warned however that this viewing demands a great deal of concentration and that subject matter is esoteric to say the least. Ranging from Fermat’s last theorem to Determinism and the laws of physics to the poetry of Lord Byron, sprinkled steadily with a history and criticism of English landscape gardening; this play can often feel more like an intelligence test than light entertainment. But, note well that these issues are the faults and fancies of the script and not its execution which was, for the most part, superb. 

Set in Sidley Park, an established country house, it opens in 1809 with Thomasina, a precocious thirteen year old mathematical prodigy, asking her tutor, Septimus Hodge, to explain the phrase “carnal embrace”. So begins discussion of yet another dominant topic of this piece – love, or the physical act of it at least. Accusations of adultery are flung about the manor and resolved in the best early nineteenth century style of men challenging each other to a duel. While Rosanna Forte as Lady Croom is excellent comic relief, Alice Gray’s Thomasina balances wonderfully presumptuous genius with naïve teen while Jonathan Griffiths certainly carries the self-importance and vexing wit demanded of a Cambridge supervisor although his emotions often lack sincerity.

The other half of the play is set in modern day when academics gather at Sidley; Hannah Jarvis to chart the gardens as a romantic motif, Valentine Coverly to calculate and graph the estate’s grouse population and Bernard Nightingale to discover whether Lord Byron were ever a murderous resident. Adam Gethin-Jones is very amusing as Nightingale, the fame-driven old fashioned English don, especially in his tirade against the entire field of science, although his toff-like accent is sometimes too preposterous. While Richard Grumitt as Valentine is perfect in his role as a softly spoken but highly sceptical Oxford post-grad recluse.

While there were first night jitters, actors were frequently stepping on or cutting in each other’s lines; all are admirable for tackling Stoppard’s dialogue in the first place and pulling it off as one could hear by the constant tittering of the audience.

Ultimately this play examines what the pursuit of knowledge really is; once again I’ll stress – only at Oxford, but isn’t that wonderful?

LGBTYou

0

The 9 minute ‘LGBTYou’ shows the breadth and similarities of their stories. From ‘coming out’ to University, they tell us the comedic highs and worrying lows of being LGBTQ in today’s world.

On your marks, get sets… watch!

0

Despite the amazing availability of television online, at locations both legal and illegal, the box set is making a comeback. The Guardian recently launched a ‘Box Set Club’, and sales keep rising: from the nostalgia of rewatching old Frasier seasons to the excitement of a spanky American drama you’d otherwise have to track down on an obscure Sky channel, we can’t get enough. We want TV on our own terms, and we’re bored of squinting into our undersized laptop screens. Enter the DVD.

In my mind, television is the purest form of procrastination. It is the truest, harking back to an age when we didn’t even know what procrastination was, we just knew that the natural thing to do when returning from school was switch on the kids channel and be sucked in to that unnaturally shiny world.

Now, with the advent of iPlayer, 4oD and other on-demand resources, we can watch snippets of television whenever we like. A Peep Show here, an episode of Africa there; it all addsup. However, there is an alternative to procrastaTV which feels oddly guiltless, and that my friends, is the box set.

Buying a box set is like the procrastinator’s version of putting a downpayment on a Ford Focus. It is a commitment, you have made an investment, and sitting watching 40 hours of West Wing suddenly has a greater meaning. You have a project, much like taking up a new hobby or completing your degree.

It is pre-meditated viewing, designed for those who missed something the first time round, those who’ve read an insightful article about the moral integrity of [insert-gritty-drama-here] or for those who insist on blogging a review of every single episode.

It is no coincidence that their popularity is on the up during a time of Big Important Dramas. They are often American, extremely well crafted and they just look bloody cool. As do their boxes. Whoever thought of spreading out the logo of a show across several DVDs was a genius. It means I have to complete the set. I have to have every series of House.

American drama in particular has dominated in recent years, and its continued success can be seen in the recent revival of shows such as The Sopranos, Six Feet Under and The West Wing on Sky Atlantic. They are still being talked about, compared to, sourced from, and thus people continue to buy them years after their airing.

One of the reasons shiny American drama like The Wire is so engaging is that it’s completely alienating. With highly paced colloquial language, grit-cop jargon and no flashbacks or catch-ups, you’re required be completely engaged for five whole series. These slow-burning, novelistic dramas require a satisfying sort of dedication, meaning the payoff is far greater at the end. It takes a while, but on the upside my inner voice is now that of a Baltimore drug dealer.

It’s not just the old favourites that are having a boxy renaissance; semirecent shows that you might have missed by a whisker are everywhere at the minute. Super-meta-sitcom Community has a huge cult following, appealing to those who like TV and those who are very aware of the fact that they like TV. Equally, shows that haven’t even finished, such as Breaking Bad, are being snapped up quicker than crystal  meth on a street corner. 

For me, buying box sets is part of my television-enthusiast vanity complex, the part that knows every character history of House and watches The Wire without subtitles. I’ll be out of a loan before Trinity.

Corridor Creeper

I’m not sure there is an “at best” corridor creeping situation but I would imagine it usually involves a debauchery-filled weekend away in the country – something you can say a naïve “Oh, what fun!” to, but never actually have to get logistically involved with.  I do know that at worst, it’s on your family holiday and you’ve got the tenuous (and slightly sinister) family friend ‘accidently’ coming into your room and climbing into bed with you.

In the university context, however, corridor creeping takes on a slightly new meaning: as exhaustion takes over after a fun night out, despite having made it all the way to your own college, you still HAVE to stay over at [Person’s] because there is absolutely no chance you can make the extra hundred metres to your own bed. 

Payback is quick for your lazy attitude though, because you inevitably find yourself creeping home at some god-awful hour in the morning when you’ve come to your senses and realised ‘Oh. Dear. God.’

Relieved of the horrendous and lengthy walk of shame that the out-of-college foray throws at you, in-college antics mean that at least you can pretend you’re visiting the vending machine/leaving the library… 

What’s so unfair is that because you’re in the same college as [Person], it’s a bit of struggle to maintain the aloof and stand-offish (yet alluring) act you’d been working on earlier in the evening…

An attempt at a Cinderalla-esque departure from Bridge is shortly followed by “Uh, share a taxi then?”

(Which he then has to pay for because you can’t find your brain, let alone your purse.)

This tends to lead into that suitably awkward point-of-no-return at the Porters’ Lodge where someone mentions that they’ve got [an obscure possession that only an Oxford student would ever own] in their room, and the next thing you know is you’re staggering up five flights of stairs because:

“Oh my god, you do?! I’ve always wanted one!”

(For future reference, to any of you who find yourself in a similar situation I would suggest skipping this awkward viewing and buy whatever it is that you so enthusiastically claim to have always wanted.)

Now that you’ve got yourself into such a compromising position (five flights of stairs up and a hundred metres away from your own bed… not the other kind of compromising position) the ol’ brain starts ticking again and has decided that this wasn’t such a good idea after all and you really need to GET OUT NOW.

Fleeting-beauty-act here we go again. Isn’t there something so mysterious about grabbing your stuff and mumbling something along the lines of: “I’ve just, um, remembered something I have to, um, do (that isn’t you), um, so I’ll, uh, see you around?” 

(Yes, you will see him around. In college. Everyday. Everywhere.)

But before the saga’s over, you’re half-way down the stairs and, “Shiiiiit.”

You left your phone behind. Back we go again, except… was his room 316 or 317?

(It definitely wasn’t 316 – apparently I was turning into the sinister family friend and creeping in on unsuspecting randomers now).

Sometimes it’s better to cut your losses and just leave the phone behind, but if you could remember the last coherent message you sent being “I’m leaving da cloooob with him ;). whoop whoop!” you’d also be pretty hell-bent on its retrieval.

I am pretty certain he thinks I left my phone behind on purpose…

Maybe my nympho subconscious did, I’m not sure.  All I do know is that with all my backing and forthing that evening, I had effectively climbed almost eight flights of stairs… I needed – no, I deserved – a sleepover.