OVER 50 PROTESTERS turned out against BNP chairman and MEP Nick Griffin last night. An invitation to Mr Griffin to speak at the Union debate was rescinded on Monday, but Mr Grif­fin later tweeted, “If I get back from parliament I’ll go anyway. As a life member of the Cam­bridge Union I have reciprocal membership.”

Union officials confirmed that they would not have acted to keep Mr Griffin out, had he come to Thursday’s debate. However, Griffin did not come, claiming on Twitter, “Unfortu­nately delay from freezing fog in central France means I’m too late to drop in on the debate. An­other time maybe ;)”

The Oxford branch of Unite Against Fascism (UAF) organised the protest, chanting “Oxford Union hear us shout, homophobes and fascists out.” Various groups were present, with one campaigner claiming that students from Ox­ford, Oxford Brookes and Ruskin College were there, as well as trade unionists and townspeo­ple.

Mr Griffin was originally invited to speak in opposition to the motion ‘This House Would be Glad to Have Gay Parents’, although Union officials claim that the invitation was sent by a rogue member of Secretary’s Committee, now facing “disciplinary action”, without approval from “the President or any other senior mem­ber of the Union committee.”

A press release from the Union also stated: “The Oxford Union does not wish to be associ­ated with the BNP in any way whatsoever. We strongly disagree with their views.”

Ian McKendrick, Secretary of Oxford UAF, said, “We were told that Nick Griffin had been invited, so we stepped up to the mark. We’re against any platform for fascists; it only incites people who support them to come out onto the streets, which is very dangerous. We’re not pre­pared to dick around, so we thought it would be better to err on the side of caution and have some kind of presence to challenge him.” He claimed that if Griffin were to turn up, “We’ll try to physically prevent him from entering.”

Of Griffin’s previous appearance at the Union in 2007, McKendrick said, “I think they learnt last time round how strongly people felt about this. It was 1500 people here; you couldn’t move. It was a massive turnout.”

Nick Evans, a PhD student at Wadham, ac­cused Griffin of “hurling homophobic hate speech”. He said, “When a fascist gets up on a platform, it’s not just a question of free speech; it’s a question of the fact that their organisa­tion will use that platform to encourage vio­lence against LGBT, minorities, and trade un­ionists.”

Sam Hollick, Green councillor for Holywell ward, said, “I’m not protesting against free­dom of speech. I think Nick Griffin has plenty of opportunities himself to publicise his own views. It is wrong for the Oxford Union to try and give a platform to someone who has such a fringe and offensive view.”

The Union was forced to draft in two replace­ment speakers after Scott Lively, controversial­ly linked to the anti-gay movement in Uganda, and Winston McKenzie, the UKIP spokesperson who described same-sex adoption as “child abuse”, pulled out of Thursday’s debate at the last minute.

GEORGE GALLOWAY faced a small protest by the Oxford Feminist Network when he arrived last Friday to give a talk to the Oxford University Pakistan Society.

The talk, which focused on the Arab Spring, was entitled “The Middle East in Turmoil: Causes and Consequences”. It was held at St Antony’s College and approximately 40 people attended.

OFN protested at the pedestrian entrance to St Antony’s on Winchester Road, whereas Galloway entered the college through the vehicular entrance on Bevington Road. The protest was sparked by Galloway’s controversial comments over the summer, in which he said Julian Assange would at most be guilty of “bad sexual etiquette” rather than rape, since the two women involved were “already in the sex game”.

A spokesperson for the OFN said, “Responses from passers-by and those going into the talk ranged from ambivalence to support,” They continued. “Faced by direct, polite questioning about his ability to differentiate consent and rape and asking him to define ‘the sex game’, Galloway hid under his hat and refused even to acknowledge our presence.”

Galloway’s Chief of Staff, Rob Hoveman, denied that this was the case, “There was no questioning of George by the Oxford Feminist Network because he had no contact with them.” Hoveman also denied that there were as many as half a dozen protesters, claiming, “There were two, and then, I think, a third woman by an entrance of St Antony’s that George didn’t enter by. It’s not quite what I would call a picket.”

The University Pakistan Society had planned to hold a conference, with Mirwaiz Umer Farooq, a Kashmiri political leader, as their keynote speaker. However, there were delays in granting him a visa, so the conference was cancelled and the decision was made to replace it with an address by George Galloway. Galloway spoke about Tunisia and the election of an Islamist party there, Egypt, and the question of Syria in the context of a history of Western imperialism.

Hoveman claimed, “The meeting was very successful and lasted for an hour and a half. Everyone who was there enjoyed it; that was the impression from the applause. The talk finished at 12.30pm but numerous people wanted to continue the discussion informally afterwards.”

Questions were only allowed on the subject of the Middle East. President of OU Pakistan Society Rinchan Mirza confirmed, “Galloway was only here to talk about the Middle East. We briefed him beforehand, and I would moderate any questions on any other topics,” Nevertheless, Hoveman said, “George made it clear to the organisers of the meeting that he was willing to answer questions on any topic from anybody.”

The address was open to everybody. OFN did not attend the talk itself but nevertheless voiced their support for the topic of the Pakistani Society’s talk. The same OFN spokesperson stated, “With the upcoming protest about Assange’s video link speech at the Union, OFN is clear that there is never an excuse for propagating rape myths.

Galloway’s claims that consent is not needed for every sex act is not only dangerous but plain wrong. We would encourage Mr Galloway to make clear that he was wrong, that he does understand the law on consent, and that he is truly sorry for his previous comments.”

Hoveman said of Galloway’s controversial remarks: “The Oxford Feminist Network seemed to be chanting ‘no means no’, which George fully agrees with. He has responded to misunderstandings about his comments on Julian Assange ad nauseam over the past few months.”

Because of Galloway’s comments regarding Julian Assange, the National Union of Students recently banned George Galloway from NUS events and affiliated student unions, such as OUSU. However, the ban does not have to be heeded by individual university societies, since they are not individually affiliated with the NUS.

Galloway has frequently courted controversy over his political career, initially as a member of the Labour Party, but now as member of Respect. He is currently MP for Bradford West, a seat he won in a 2012 by-election.

RESEARCHERS AT the Oxford Internet Institute have been exploring what geotagged tweets can reveal about the offline world. The research has led them to create a Twitter map to try and un­derstand the link between the club football fans support and the places where they live.

The data included all geocoded tweets men­tioning any of the Premier League football teams and their associated hashtags, (for exam­ple #MUFC) that were sent between 18th August and 19th December 2012. The tweets were then matched to postal codes in order to map a fairly detailed geography of results.

The data shows that contrary to popular be­lief Manchester City is not the “real” local team and that Mancunians support both the city team and Manchester United. Only a few parts of Greater Manchester showed significantly more tweets mentioning Manchester City over their local rivals.

The team at the Oxford Institute for Internet were also able to map the Merseyside rivalry be­tween Liverpool and Everton. The twitter map shows that while Liverpool is slightly more pop­ular in the postcode that is home to both team’s stadiums, there is no clear divide in the rest of the region.

Examining the map in more detail, and look­ing at specific postcodes, the researchers were able to see which teams are most mentioned there. Interestingly, Oxford academics men­tioned Manchester City more than any other team.

On the Oxford Internet Institute website the team of researchers commented, “There is no doubt that using Tweets as a proxy for fandom is messy and not always reliable. But, the data does give us a rough sense of who is interested in – or at least talking about – what, and where they are doing it from.” The authors added, “It allows to begin to counter myths, for example that Mancunians don’t support Manchester United, develop new insights about places that we don’t necessarily have good data about, and most importantly, have some guesses as to which team the Queen might support.”

Previously the research has focused on geo-located tweets about floods and earthquakes. They also tracked racist comments during Oba­ma’s election in order to see what mapping the data would reveal. Whilst the researchers were measuring tweets rather than people, it was es­tablished that there are some fairly strong clus­tering of hate tweets centred in southeastern US states. These states had a much higher rate than the national average.

In an article for the Guardian’s Data Blog, the authors of the research concluded, “the unfor­tunate fact is that most states are not immune from this kind of activity. Racist behaviour, par­ticularly directed at African Americans in the US, is all too easy to find both offline and in in­formation space.”

One of the researchers, Dr Mark Graham com­mented, “This method could be used for much wider purposes: possibly, in times of crisis we could see what was being said on the social me­dia site about hurricanes or riots to see what was actually happening ‘offline’ in certain areas of the country. This is exploratory work into the digital shadows we create, and the full poten­tial of its applications has yet to be realised.”

During a bop last Friday night, several students from Regent’s Park College ran naked through Oxford, wearing only their commoner’s gowns. Known as the Bodleian Quad Run, the objective is to run the half-mile from Regent’s Park into town, to complete a lap of Radcliffe Square, and then return to college.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%6628%%[/mm-hide-text]

At about 9.45, after Formal Hall and once the bop had already started, it was announced that several students would be attempting the Bod Quad Run. Several students gathered in college – the boys wearing only commoner’s gowns, the girls only underwear – before setting off into town. While some only went as far as St Giles’ before returning, the rest completed the whole of the run and then returned to the bop.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%6629%%[/mm-hide-text]

One Regent’s student said, “I thought it was pretty random, particularly at that time of night; I mean, it’s not like it’s part of a running joke or anything. All the same, they re-nude my enthusiasm for the bop.”

In a conversation about their university bucket lists, the two third-year students, Pascoe Foxell and Yves Weissenberger, decided they wanted to have written a novel before leaving Oxford. Foxell told Cherwell, “[the conversation] overlapped with a separate conversation on writing. Then we asked, ‘How long would it take to sit down and write a novel?’”

Foxell and Weissenberger agreed on some conditions for the 24 hour challenge. Each contestant had to devote 40 minutes of every hour to writing, and had to stay away from the internet in the first 12 hours. The two paid a 30 pound deposit each at the start, to be donated to a charity of choice in the event of a withdraw­al from the competition. The pair were relieved by friends for an hour.

After the challenge, Foxell commented “I couldn’t tell if I wrote a really long short story, or a really short novel. Right at the end, when I was tying it all up and making it conclude in a good way, I was saying ‘fuck you’ to my ear­lier self who had written all that unconnected bullshit.”

Weissenberger described the unexpected­ness of the writing process, “Sometimes the characters did something I didn’t know they were going to do. I had no idea how to move forward, and then a bartender uttered an un­expected command to my main character and I thought, ‘Oh, this is interesting.’”

He described his 20,000 word opus as about “a person who wakes up somewhere else every time he falls asleep. He has no idea if it is the same universe, because there is no reliable way to know how far away things are.” According to Foxell, “my piece of writing is about conspiracy theories, quite a bit, with detective stories mixed in, and lots of people transforming into other things, physically.”

Rachel Evans, a 3rd year psychologist from St John’s commented, “I’m thinking of including Pascoe and Yves as a case study of the creative process in my dissertation. This morning I went on the BBC website and found a story about a student who mooned some hell’s angels, threw a puppy at them, and escaped on a bulldozer. I wondered if Pascoe had infiltrated BBC News.”

UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS hold the least stress­ful jobs, new research finds.

A recent study has found that university pro­fessors are amongst the least stressed employ­ees in the country. The research, completed by CareerCast.com, came to its conclusion after considering almost a dozen factors including deadlines, working in the public eye, physical demands and hazards encountered within the workplace.

The study found that the substantial sal­ary most professors enjoy contributes greatly to their low levels of stress: the Times Higher Education statistics for 2011 show that the aver­age annual salary for a full time professor was £75,790. Average annual earnings for UK work­ers overall are £26,500, meaning that university professors enjoy an income almost three times higher than that of the average worker.

As well as this, the research states that uni­versity professors are also lucky in that, unlike primary and secondary school teachers, they are educating people who have chosen to study the subject they teach and are in general more enjoyable and rewarding to work with.

First year physicist Danny Johnson, speaking of his tutor, quipped, “He obviously derived stress from first principles, and worked out that it wasn’t optimal.”

However there has been some protest from university professors at the findings of the re­search. A comment left on the Career Cast web­site said, “Hmmm…so what is it to lecture to 300 students? (or 30 or 70, for that matter)? And they say public speaking is ranked among the most feared, stressful things persons can imag­ine, not even preferable to threat of death…”

There have also been arguments raised about the fact that pressure is put on professors to continue to ensure their students perform aca­demically well, even if it would not necessar­ily reflect badly on them if their students did poorly.

PPEist Sean Thomas said, “I can see that hav­ing the ability to involve yourself in your sub­ject professionally must be a hugely rewarding prospect. But then at the same time it must be utterly soul-destroying to have to read the same garbage handed in every week by your fresher philosophy students each year, for the rest of your working life.”

A first year Keble student looked at the find­ings on a much more personal level, saying, “If this is true, it explains why our tutor has so much time to think up new ways to punish us.”

OXFORD CITY COUNCIL has approved plans for an Oxford University research facility on the site of an old hospital in Headington. The Park Hospital buildings were bought from the NHS last year. The University is planning to demolish them to create 48,000 square metres of research space.

According to an Oxford University spokesman, “world leading” research will take place in the new development. Professor Rodney Phillips of the University’s Medical Sciences Division said that “the site offers great prospects for expanding the University’s world leading medical research.”

Professor Phillips stressed that the plans will also benefit local residents: “Patients at the nearby hospitals will have first access to clinical trials and new drugs and they will be treated by world-leading medical researchers.”

It will take 20 to 25 years for the new plans take shape.