Saturday, May 3, 2025
Blog Page 1587

Rowing suspended with multiple collisions

0

Although Wednesday morning’s calm weather had allowed the crews to begin racing at midday, twenty minutes later conditions had deteriorated to such an extent that racing was cancelled.

The Somerville Novices Crew A got the bow of their boat wedged between a moored Salters Steamer and a mooring post while turning their boat around on wednesday morning. John Harfield, a rower from St John’s, saw the Somerville Women’s crew in difficulty and stopped to help them.

He told Cherwell “I could see Somerville were in trouble with the bow wedged, I got them to get a marshall to get the safety launch. OURC wanted to get the girls onto the boat and asked if I could get there, so I stepped into the river then climbed up the steamer. From then it was just a case of getting the 8 girls and their cox up onto the steamer so they could be taken by launch back to dry land. They were clearly all cold and in shock so I tried to get them clothes from the bank.”

All the rowers were checked by Epione Medical Services and no one was injured. Rumours that a boat had capsized were found to be false.

Saibh Finlayson, rowing for a Balliol crew, told the Cherwell that they had sat in the “pouring rain” for half an hour waiting to race before the regatta was cancelled. She also reported that “some people were saying the river should never have been green-flagged at all” and that the “current was really strong.”

Alex Chajecki, the Regatta Captain for the 2012 competition, told the Cherwell that “At 12pm the crews were ready to start, and the conditions were fairly calm, so it was deemed entirely safe. Over the next twenty minutes things changed rapidly, with increasing winds and significant increase in stream. The decision was made to hold the next division immediately. We then confirmed with the lock and the Environment Agency that conditions were looking to continue to deteriorate, so the rest of the day was cancelled.”

The Regatta was also cancelled on Thursday, with the environment agency issuing warnings of either ‘Caution strong stream’ or ‘Caution stream increasing’ on most of the locks around Oxford.

Somerville College Boat Club weren’t the only club to experience a collision. Balliol Women’s Captain Kateryna Frolova told Cherwell that, there was a “huge hole in the stern of the boat” from a collision with a Jesus College crew whilst waiting on the river.

Despite the accidents, Ian Maconnachie, the Sabbatical Officer for Rowing, defended the decision to continue with racing. He claimed, “The situation was closely monitored this term as to whether crews were experienced enough to race in Christ Church Regatta. Many of the novice crews had raced in the Nephthys Regatta last weekend and in the Isis Winter League in the weekend before that, without any accidents.”

Maconnachie further commented, “There is obviously a marginally higher level of risk due to less experience, but when marshalled and organised safely, there is no reason for an event like Christ Church Regatta to be unsafe.” Both the Somerville accident and the Balliol collision happened after the races had been suspended.

This is not the first time that the Christ Church Regatta has been suspended. Rob Wadsworth, a rower at Balliol College, commented that indivdual days of the Regatta were “quite often” suspended but also agreed with the safety officials’ decision as ‘if it’s really wet and there’s a strong steam, it’s not safe to row.”

Anthony Stansfeld elected PCC

0

The turnout rate in the election was lower than that of the OUSU election last week, as just 10.9% of Oxford residents voted in the PCC election last week, compared to 16% at the OUSU elections.

Tim Starkey, the Labour candidate, lost in the second round of voting as no candidates achieved 50% of first round votes, told Cherwell, “The abysmal turnout raises serious questions about the way the election has been organised and the role itself. One of Anthony Stansfeld’s first tasks will be to engage with all the communities across Thames Valley, including in urban areas where very few people voted for him, and including the many people who are unsure about what the PCC role means. I wish him well.”

Stansfeld outlined his aims for improving policing in Thames Valley, saying, “I aim to reduce those crimes that are of the most concern to communities, and catch those committing them.”

He claimed that his victory was due to the fact that he was “the most experienced candidate.” He added, “I also have been on the Police Authority, and for the last 18 months had responsibility for Performance for Thames Police. During this period we were the most improved police force in England. I know how to run things and control large budgets.”

Several candidates criticised the low turnout. “Turnout was not satisfactory,” Stansfeld claimed, before adding, “though over 94,000 voted for me, and a large number did not vote against me!” Barry Cooper, the UKIP candidate, claimed turnout was “appalling” and blamed “the government.”

“If the new PCC does his job properly and embraces the populist, democratic elements of the role, a mandate will evolve over time. If he doesn’t, then this will have been a wasted chance for some real democracy to enter at least one facet of how we are governed.”

The Importance of Arts

0

Creativity is an integral part of our culture – every iconic painting or photograph, every enchanting theatre or dance production, every technological development, was based on creativity. To relegate the performing arts to secondary subjects would be to ignore the direction in which cultural growth is progressing.

We are undeniably now living in a visual culture, surrounded by television, video games, Facebook, online articles – and must therefore appreciate the growing importance of this subject, as a crucial element to any marketing campaign.

We British have never shied away from attempting to astound the nation and even the world with our creative prowess: what better example of Britain’s creative capacity than the Opening Ceremony for the Olympics? No one can deny that Danny Boyle’s expertly executed show, watched by 900 million worldwide, perfectly demonstrated our ability to merge all aspects of society, as Shakespearean actor Kenneth Branagh strolled amongst the rising chimneys of the Industrial Revolution, dressed as Isambard Kingdom Brunel proclaiming Caliban’s speech from The Tempest, in a triumphant union of industry and literature.

Britain has clearly proved itself capable of producing immensely talented creative individuals – this should therefore be reason enough to continue to fund the arts in the curriculum. If we do not, we will be depriving our society of cultural variety. At the same time, although basic prowess can be taught, it is the individual and distinctive styles that make such valuable contributions to our culture, which arrive through inspiration and imagination rather than with a whiteboard and a classroom.

Whilst some therefore argue that those who show a genuine passion in the arts should develop this interest recreationally, I fear that arts subjects may flounder and wither away without the cultivating support from the curriculum – surely it is asking too much for the government to expect untaught geniuses to pop up like daisies. Parents would have to turn to private tuition in order to encourage their children’s interests. Do we really want a creative body that is dominated by the privately educated, an unobtainable dream for the underprivileged?

Surely the arts deserve as much credibility in a teaching environment as humanities or sciences; after all, if the government does not value them as educational subjects, the students themselves will not consider them to be valid career pursuits. Students generally find that the greater freedom that these subjects offer gives them more self-motivation, as well as encouraging them to develop their understanding rather than simply recalling facts for exams. These subjects also offer the less academically gifted a chance to excel, opening up possible career lines in theatre, music, marketing and other creative enterprises.

Besides, even if an education in the arts does not lead to a professional career for all students, it can still be hugely rewarding as an intellectual discipline; creative thinking is undoubtedly beneficial in any work environment. And if that doesn’t influence the government, surely the arts industry revenue of £9 billion is incentive enough to prevent it being marginalised?

Student anger unabated

0

A number of Oxford students expressed their anger at the raised tuition fees in a march organised predominantly by the NUS in London on Wednesday. The protest marks the two year anniversary since the first protest in November 2010. The event was held on the Wednesday in order to coincide with Prime Minister’s Questions as, according to the NUS, this was “the best day to make an impact on policy makers and the press.”

OUSU supported the demonstration and provided transport to and from London.

According to the NUS website, the aim of the march was to “show the government how angry we are at their betrayals and broken promises.” It claimed to be marching for three key principles: education, employment and empowerment.

The sentiment at the protest has been described by those that attended as a bitter one. OUSU President- Elect Tom Rutland commented, “The mood at the protest today was one of discontent and anger: students are facing unprecedented challenges – triples fees, poor graduate job prospects and unacceptable cuts to higher education.”

Lincoln student Nathan Akehurst concurred, commenting, “It was quite militant, and the cold and wet didn’t help. People were angry, worried and also a great deal more nuanced and politically aware than in 2010.”

Others, however, have been keen to point out that the march was a peaceful and positive affair. Second year St. Anne’s student Joe Collin told Cherwell, “The march itself had a great atmosphere, almost like a carnival because of the drums. People were angry, but it definitely wasn’t intimidating.”

Although there was a significant police presence, the protests were absent of violent stand-offs. Those who attended have remained upbeat about the possible consequences of the march. 

Rutland continued, “What was achieved was putting student issues on the national agenda: lobbying the government has failed and direct action was our last option. For too long students have been betrayed by the government and when conversations fail, we have to march and take action. We were promised the abolition of tuition fees and no cancelling of EMA and what we got was tripled fees and the end of EMA. With the government faltering and all parties preparing an agenda for the next election, it was time for students to make all parties listen up.”

Others have stressed that whilst the impact might not be immediate, this was an important voicing of the views of students. Akehurst commented, “I don’t think the government will listen, but I do think what we can achieve through the demonstration is a stepping stone to a wider, broader and more active student union that can present a real challenge, as we have seen in Canada.” 

Some, however, have expressed disappointment at the way the demonstration was organised by the NUS. After marching through London, the protest was moved to Kennington where a number of speeches were given. One student commented, “It seemed bizarre to move everyone from parliament where we might be able to actually get our message across to a park to listen to people preach to the converted.”

NUS president Liam Burns was heckled as he gave his speech, with several protesters mounting the stage. OUSU President-elect Rutland defended Burns, commenting, “The heckling was carried out by a small group of students who are not representative of the majority. Liam’s done more work with Oxford than previous Presidents and should be commended.”

Seasonal Exhibitions

0

London

Seduced by Art

You can’t escape photography in London this Christmas as classic photographers and their work are revived and brought to life alongside traditional painting and colour. Even the National Gallery is embracing this hybrid with Seduced by Art, an exhibition combining photography of the likes of Martin Parr and Sam Taylor-Wood with traditional works of Constable and Degas. Demonstrating the influence that historical painting has had on contemporary photography, it is arranged according to themes such as landscape and portraiture.

A Bigger Splash

Demonstrating the connections existing within the arts, A Bigger Splash at the Tate Modern looks at the relationship between performance and painting. There’s Hockney, there’s Pollock. There’s exploration using make-up, canvas and even gender role play. Head on down to the old power station to see how some young artists have drawn on the theatrical to explore new ideas of painting. 

Oxford

Freeze

In Oxford over Christmas? After having to twist college’s arm to give you vac res just so you can spend most of December in the bod, take a break with Freeze, a collaborative work between wire sculpture and print making. The artists use their respective mediums to capture a single moment in time, representing those moments that will all too quickly pass by. It’s at the O3 Gallery, so there’s plenty of time afterwards to snack on mince pies and sip some mulled wine and do a bit of Christmas shopping at the Castle’s Christmas Market. 

Designer Makers

Not quite a traditional exhibition, but a perfect place to discover some local Oxfordshire artists and purchase some last minute Christmas presents. Brought to you by the Old Fire Station, these pieces by the members of the Oxford Craft Guild will be very unusual and of the highest quality. Woodturning, glass, ceramics and jewellery are all represented – this is local art at its most beautiful.

Manchester

The First Cut

Cherwell Arts is always looking for some less traditional artistic approaches and nothing could be more interesting than The First Cut at the Manchester Art Gallery and Gallery of Costume. 31 international artists who work by manipulating paper have created sculptures including a magical forest of paper trees, a galaxy and some fairytale butterflies and birds. There’s also a more serious aspect, with paper guns and currency used to comment on socio-political issues. The Gallery of Costume even has some paper clothes and shoes. Pa-per-fect.

Comedians: From the 1940s

A touring National Portrait Gallery exhibition comes to the Lowry this Christmas. There’s over 50 portrait photographs of classic comedians such as Benny Hill, Sid James and Eric Morecambe and their modern incarnations of Matt Lucas, Mitchell and Webb and even, Johnny Vegas. Like comedy? Like photography? Like Comedians.

Edinburgh

S.J. Peploe

As part of the Scottish Colourist Series, the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art (a free gallery bus from the Scottish National Gallery on Princes street, right in the centre of Edinburgh can take you there) this Christmas is showing the work of S.J. Peploe. Considered the leader and most successful of the group, Peploe painted extensive still lifes using props such as tulips and coffee pots, and landscapes in Scotland and France. This particular exhibition shows over 100 Peploe pieces from public and private collections.

Cells

Always keen to show how art can affect all disciplines, Cherwell arts has discovered Cells: The Smallest of All Portraits, an exhibition including microscopic photographs produced as a collaboration between visual arts and scientific research by school children and scientists. Not only a treat for the eyes, but also your mind as you question your existence and what portraiture means in the 21st century. 

Interview: David Gandy & Alex Bilmes

0

Prince Charles is my style icon!” For not the first time during this interview, I find myself taken aback by Gandy’s response. Just to check I haven’t misheard, I ask, “Prince Charles?”

Prince Charles is my style icon!” For not the first time during this interview, I find myself taken aback by Gandy’s response. Just to check I haven’t misheard, I ask, “Prince Charles?” 
“Yes! He’s an incredibly stylish man. People laugh when I say this, but no one pulls off a double-breasted suit like him; he drives an Aston Martin, he always looks impeccable. Really, you’ll never find a picture of him not looking superb.”
 I’m sitting opposite David Gandy, dubbed the world’s only male supermodel, famous for his role in the Dolce and Gabbana Light Blue campaign (remember? The boat, the blue, the briefs? If not, Google it immediately – you’re welcome). With him is Alex Bilmes, the editor of Esquire magazine, formerly Features Director at GQ. They’re talking about the London fashion scene, which they believe is finally learning how to show itself off. As Gandy says, London’s learnt how to “use what we have, and what no one else has. This year Prince Charles opened the first London Men’s Fashion Week. No one else can do that – no one else has the royal family!”
 Preparing for my interview with Gandy and Bilmes was quite a challenge. Aside from attempting to make myself look as attractive as was physically possible in order to ensure that Gandy, the most beautiful man in the world, wouldn’t be able to resist asking me to dinner (sadly, he managed), I had to prepare for both an experienced journalist, and a model who, to be frank, I didn’t expect would be able to string two sentences together. Perhaps fortunately, on meeting Gandy, I realized my assumptions were entirely incorrect. As I quickly hid my list of questions including ‘is it awkward having to get naked so often?’ and ‘will you be doing Movember?’ (he won’t, by the way), my assumptions about Gandy were quickly shattered.
 Both men talk passionately about their involvement with London Collections: Men, “a brand new showcase of British menswear, style and culture”, and the direction that London fashion is taking. Bilmes tells me that London fashion is special, that “historically, there were only really two great international homes of men’s wear: Milan and London. The amazing thing about London men’s fashion, and women’s too, is that it’s a combination of two extremes. We have the avant-garde, pop culture, street style which we’ve always led the world in and then there’s the more traditional formal style: Savile Row.” 
They stress that London fashion might be leading the pack, but in a “traditionally British” manner: we don’t like to talk about it. “We’ve been too brusque and self-deprecating about it [London fashion]. We’ve had the most amazing people come out of the London fashion scene and it’s about time we started banging the drum about what we can do”, Bilmes tells me. He lists Alexander McQueen, John Galliano, and Vivienne Westwood as some examples of designers steeped in, and shaped by, British culture.
 Both men are on the committee for London Collections: Men, and I ask Gandy why he thinks fashion is so important. He replies, “What’s the first thing you look at when you meet someone? Their eyes. And the second? Their shoes.”
 I ask about the Olympics, and Gandy’s experience walking as a part of the closing ceremony alongside models such as Kate Moss and Naomi Campbell. His immediate reaction? “It was terrifying.” But he goes on to speak of the change that the Olympics has kick started for British culture: “I think what Britain did well with the Olympics was to invest. Britain’s not very good at investing, but we showed that we can with the Olympics. Fashion brings a hell of a lot of money into an economy which is struggling at the moment and [having a fashion show as part of the closing ceremony] brought to light our fashion heritage and its importance.”
 Bilmes echoes this sentiment, “The thing with fashion is that because it’s glamorous and glitzy its sometimes perceived as being lightweight but David’s absolutely right: it’s incredibly important to our economy. It brings money, investment, and a buzz to our country and our city in a way that some less glamorous professions don’t. That’s something that needs to be recognized and that’s what London Collections: Men is about – it’s us, the actual industry, saying were going to make a fuss about ourselves.”
 Both Gandy and Bilmes speak with pride of Britain’s modelling credentials, Gandy mentioning that, “Kate [Moss] is still the best model in the world at the end of the day.” However, asked about the potential problems with an industry which more and more frequently sees women sacrificing their health for their careers they are more reticent. They both see this issue as almost exclusively a female one: Gandy says, “I was never worried about not being sample size. People told me I had to lose weight and I went the opposite way. I don’t think there’s such pressure on men to have to be a certain size.” He emphasizes the designer’s role in this situation, comparing it to a chicken and egg situation. “Yes, designers make clothes in a certain size – sample size. But it’s impossible to know whether this is because they were making clothes to fit models, or if the models are made to fit the clothes.”
They speak of the media’s influence, and Gandy reiterates, “There are naturally thin girls and people say “Oh, she must be anorexic”, but that’s just not true. Some people are just physically thin. I’ve been with girls”, he pauses, and I hold my breath, thinking he’s going to delve into his romantic history, until he continues, “on shoots who eat more than me but are still wafer thin.” 
 I wonder if Gandy takes this relaxed approach to his physique, if he’s ‘just naturally’ an Adonis? “No, it’s not a natural physique. I work at it. If I’m training for a shoot I’ll work out maybe five times a week, if I’m just maintaining a plateau then maybe three or four.”
 We move from models to modelling, a career which Bilmes stresses, “is a skill like any other. I think it’s a funny thing which most people don’t understand, and I don’t necessarily understand it either, but I can recognize it. People think it’s just someone so good looking they just stand there in the clothes and you can take a great picture of them but that’s not actually what it is. It’s difficult to describe because it’s not like being an actor or a doctor.”
 Gandy interrupts, “It’s almost harder.” My feelings at this statement were probably something along the same lines as yours, but Gandy doesn’t mean this (I don’t think) literally. He stresses that modelling is just a combination of skills and practices very different from that of a more usual profession. “You have to take in what the magazine wants, what the client wants, what the photographer wants, and then you have to convey that in a second in a snapshot. It’s a very difficult thing to do, and some people absolutely physically cannot do that.”
 I ask both men what advice they’d give an aspiring model or journalist and, surprisingly, their answers are the same: “perseverance.” Gandy acknowledges, “one photographer might not like you, one agency might not like you, one production firm might not like you – but someone probably will. It’s just a matter of patience and perseverance and being realistic at the end of the day. And you need someone to believe in you.” Gandy is very aware of how much he owes to his agency, Select Model Management, and the people there who have always believed in him. Bilmes echoes this sentiment, “You have to take the knocks and ride out [the unsuccessful years]. We’re the same as anyone in that we needed a break.”
 I can’t help but wonder how important they think it is to get that elusive ‘lucky break’, especially for people graduating into an economy looking pretty bleak in terms of career prospects. Bilmes is firm on this subject, “Luck’s what you make of it. Plenty of people get opportunities and blow them, or ignore them, or don’t even know that they’re there.” Gandy quotes one of his favourite sayings, “There’s no such thing as luck. There’s a well-prepared man waiting for an opportunity.” He continues, “If you’re not prepared for it and that opportunity comes along and you ruin it then that’s your own fault and you cant blame anyone else.” So that’s it then, I think, persist for long enough and we’ll all make it? Bilmes is quick to correct me, “Oh, and then you have to work really, really hard. You just do.”
 The two men have to head back to London and as we shake hands I notice Gandy looking at first my eyes (swoon), and then my shoes (shit. Uggs. That’s probably a fashion faux pas), and I remember, “What’s the third thing you look at?” They laugh and Bilmes jokes, “My own shoes, just to make sure they’re better.”

“Yes! He’s an incredibly stylish man. People laugh when I say this, but no one pulls off a double-breasted suit like him; he drives an Aston Martin, he always looks impeccable. Really, you’ll never find a picture of him not looking superb.”

I’m sitting opposite David Gandy, dubbed the world’s only male supermodel, famous for his role in the Dolce and Gabbana Light Blue campaign (remember? The boat, the blue, the briefs? If not, Google it immediately – you’re welcome). With him is Alex Bilmes, the editor of Esquire magazine, formerly Features Director at GQ. They’re talking about the London fashion scene, which they believe is finally learning how to show itself off. As Gandy says, London’s learnt how to “use what we have, and what no one else has. This year Prince Charles opened the first London Men’s Fashion Week. No one else can do that – no one else has the royal family!”

Preparing for my interview with Gandy and Bilmes was quite a challenge. Aside from attempting to make myself look as attractive as was physically possible in order to ensure that Gandy, the most beautiful man in the world, wouldn’t be able to resist asking me to dinner (sadly, he managed), I had to prepare for both an experienced journalist, and a model who, to be frank, I didn’t expect would be able to string two sentences together. Perhaps fortunately, on meeting Gandy, I realized my assumptions were entirely incorrect. As I quickly hid my list of questions including ‘is it awkward having to get naked so often?’ and ‘will you be doing Movember?’ (he won’t, by the way), my assumptions about Gandy were quickly shattered. 

Both men talk passionately about their involvement with London Collections: Men, “a brand new showcase of British menswear, style and culture”, and the direction that London fashion is taking. Bilmes tells me that London fashion is special, that “historically, there were only really two great international homes of men’s wear: Milan and London. The amazing thing about London men’s fashion, and women’s too, is that it’s a combination of two extremes. We have the avant-garde, pop culture, street style which we’ve always led the world in and then there’s the more traditional formal style: Savile Row.”

They stress that London fashion might be leading the pack, but in a “traditionally British” manner: we don’t like to talk about it. “We’ve been too brusque and self-deprecating about it [London fashion]. We’ve had the most amazing people come out of the London fashion scene and it’s about time we started banging the drum about what we can do”, Bilmes tells me. He lists Alexander McQueen, John Galliano, and Vivienne Westwood as some examples of designers steeped in, and shaped by, British culture.

Both men are on the committee for London Collections: Men, and I ask Gandy why he thinks fashion is so important. He replies, “What’s the first thing you look at when you meet someone? Their eyes. And the second? Their shoes.” I ask about the Olympics, and Gandy’s experience walking as a part of the closing ceremony alongside models such as Kate Moss and Naomi Campbell. His immediate reaction? “It was terrifying.”

But he goes on to speak of the change that the Olympics has kick started for British culture: “I think what Britain did well with the Olympics was to invest. Britain’s not very good at investing, but we showed that we can with the Olympics. Fashion brings a hell of a lot of money into an economy which is struggling at the moment and [having a fashion show as part of the closing ceremony] brought to light our fashion heritage and its importance.”

Bilmes echoes this sentiment, “The thing with fashion is that because it’s glamorous and glitzy its sometimes perceived as being lightweight but David’s absolutely right: it’s incredibly important to our economy. It brings money, investment, and a buzz to our country and our city in a way that some less glamorous professions don’t. That’s something that needs to be recognized and that’s what London Collections: Men is about – it’s us, the actual industry, saying were going to make a fuss about ourselves.”

Both Gandy and Bilmes speak with pride of Britain’s modelling credentials, Gandy mentioning that, “Kate [Moss] is still the best model in the world at the end of the day.” However, asked about the potential problems with an industry which more and more frequently sees women sacrificing their health for their careers they are more reticent.

They both see this issue as almost exclusively a female one: Gandy says, “I was never worried about not being sample size. People told me I had to lose weight and I went the opposite way. I don’t think there’s such pressure on men to have to be a certain size.” He emphasizes the designer’s role in this situation, comparing it to a chicken and egg situation. “Yes, designers make clothes in a certain size – sample size. But it’s impossible to know whether this is because they were making clothes to fit models, or if the models are made to fit the clothes.”

They speak of the media’s influence, and Gandy reiterates, “There are naturally thin girls and people say “Oh, she must be anorexic”, but that’s just not true. Some people are just physically thin. I’ve been with girls”, he pauses, and I hold my breath, thinking he’s going to delve into his romantic history, until he continues, “on shoots who eat more than me but are still wafer thin.”

I wonder if Gandy takes this relaxed approach to his physique, if he’s ‘just naturally’ an Adonis? “No, it’s not a natural physique. I work at it. If I’m training for a shoot I’ll work out maybe five times a week, if I’m just maintaining a plateau then maybe three or four.”

We move from models to modelling, a career which Bilmes stresses, “is a skill like any other. I think it’s a funny thing which most people don’t understand, and I don’t necessarily understand it either, but I can recognize it. People think it’s just someone so good looking they just stand there in the clothes and you can take a great picture of them but that’s not actually what it is. It’s difficult to describe because it’s not like being an actor or a doctor.”

Gandy interrupts, “It’s almost harder.” My feelings at this statement were probably something along the same lines as yours, but Gandy doesn’t mean this (I don’t think) literally. He stresses that modelling is just a combination of skills and practices very different from that of a more usual profession. “You have to take in what the magazine wants, what the client wants, what the photographer wants, and then you have to convey that in a second in a snapshot. It’s a very difficult thing to do, and some people absolutely physically cannot do that.”

I ask both men what advice they’d give an aspiring model or journalist and, surprisingly, their answers are the same: “perseverance.” Gandy acknowledges, “one photographer might not like you, one agency might not like you, one production firm might not like you – but someone probably will. It’s just a matter of patience and perseverance and being realistic at the end of the day. And you need someone to believe in you.”

Gandy is very aware of how much he owes to his agency, Select Model Management, and the people there who have always believed in him. Bilmes echoes this sentiment, “You have to take the knocks and ride out [the unsuccessful years]. We’re the same as anyone in that we needed a break.”

I can’t help but wonder how important they think it is to get that elusive ‘lucky break’, especially for people graduating into an economy looking pretty bleak in terms of career prospects. Bilmes is firm on this subject, “Luck’s what you make of it. Plenty of people get opportunities and blow them, or ignore them, or don’t even know that they’re there.”

Gandy quotes one of his favourite sayings, “There’s no such thing as luck. There’s a well-prepared man waiting for an opportunity.” He continues, “If you’re not prepared for it and that opportunity comes along and you ruin it then that’s your own fault and you cant blame anyone else.” So that’s it then, I think, persist for long enough and we’ll all make it? Bilmes is quick to correct me, “Oh, and then you have to work really, really hard. You just do.”

The two men have to head back to London and as we shake hands I notice Gandy looking at first my eyes (swoon), and then my shoes (shit. Uggs. That’s probably a fashion faux pas), and I remember, “What’s the third thing you look at?” They laugh and Bilmes jokes, “My own shoes, just to make sure they’re better.”

Meller Merceux awards prize for contemporary art review

0

The Meller Merceux Gallery on Oxford High Street, which specialises in modern and contemporary art, has joined up with Oxford University’s Edgar Wind Society, to offer a prize for the best review of a recent exhibition on modern art.

The Edgar Wind Society, a student established and run society, promotes interest in the visual arts by inviting speakers and holding various other events. Meller Merceux is one of Oxford’s most high-profile commercial art galleries, with recent shows including Picasso and Tribal Art.

On Thursday 22nd November, Times art critic Waldemar Januszczak, attended a black tie dinner at Oriel College, where the prize was awarded and to speak about contemporary art.

Here is the winning review: 

Tim Walker: Story Teller

18th October 2012 – 27th January 2013

East Wing Galleries, Somerset House, London.

Tim Walker, the eponymous fashion photographer at the heart of Somerset House’s current exhibition Tim Walker: Story Teller, is the quirky darling of the fashion world. His meticulously ornate images, with their lush Baroque detailing and gauzy use of light, often appear to be staged on the set-piece of some pastel fairy-tale. Populated with celebrities, models, and the finest haute couture, Walker’s photographs are lauded for transforming sartorial bibles such as Vogue and W into whimsical picture books. 

In Story Teller, the bright-yet-rustic East Wing of Somerset House plays the perfect host to Walker’s world. Just like in the photographs themselves, the exhibition space is beautifully curated; indeed, with its wooden floors, high ceilings and pretty fireplaces, it is exactly the sort of interior in which Walker’s narratives unfold. Emphasising this throughout the exhibition are the numerous props transported from the images themselves – a crashed fighter jet, a swan- shaped sailboat, snails sucking the walls – which form the centrepieces of a number of the rooms and further materialise Walker’s playful vision.

These opening rooms are particularly beautiful, showcasing some of Walker’s more spectacular images: the moody blues of Fantasia on a nautical theme (2010) and David White and his swan (2010); the ornamental porcelains of Laura McCone and Luke Field-Wright as floral figures (2010) and Frida Gustavsson as Meissen figurine (2011); and the pastel fantasy of the Rococo Olga Shearer on blue horse (2007).

Walker’s best photographs are undoubtedly those that take place in these elaborately dressed settings, like the sort of empty, impossible houses that one might find through the looking glass. He often draws on a Carrollian sense of absurdity, innocence, and displacement, as well as a similar fetishisation of childish naivety. Lucan Gillespie takes tea with the honey bee (2012) is almost quintessentially Alice-in-Wonderland-esque, with its primly-dressed blonde waif and her anthropomorphic tablemate.

As compelling as these richly decorated photographs are, however, when Walker strays from this formula – as he does in the second half of the show – his work often falls flat. His celebrity portraits are, for the most part, generic. Lacking his characteristic set dressing (most are shot against a minimalist white background), they also lack his defining imaginative vision and aesthetic signature. When they do stand out, such as some strikingly geometric images of Tilda Swinton and a series of slapstick portraits of Monty Python, it is due to the charismatic force of their subjects and not their creator. Arguably, this is perfect for magazines, in which the photographer is merely a medium for the celebrity at hand and the photograph an accompanying illustration to a written piece, but the associated desire to flip past the images to reach some more substantial content is no less present inside the gallery walls. 

Unfortunately, substance is hard to find in Story Teller. Later rooms show Walker departing further from his trademark style with a road sign-themed fashion shoot, which is as dull and one- dimensional as its inspiration. Similarly, a collection of photographs involving a UFO in quotidian situations is unremarkable, while another involving living dolls is playful but too literal and clichéd.

Even his most striking and successful images, however, despite their beauty and charms, function on this entirely superficial level. In many ways, they are like ornamental china or decorative wallpaper: beautiful, delicate, fragile, but, ultimately, pure surface. While the exhibition tries to eke out loftier themes – death, youth, nostalgia, contemplation of the digital age – Walker’s work rarely ignites serious contemplation.

As a result, as visually exciting as the exhibition can be, it never manages to transcend the circumscription of ‘fashion photography’. Despite aesthetic and theoretical evocations of a number of modern and contemporary ‘art’ photographers, such as Loretta Lux, Cindy Sherman, and even Francesca Woodman, the images that make up Story Teller lack the same emotional and intellectual resonance. Nothing about Walker’s photographs challenges the viewer, conceptions of photography, or the established lexicon of beauty; indeed, some – such as a shoot with Agyness Deyn in the desert accompanied by a tribesman and a cheetah – smack of the kind of primitivist, orientalist, and problematically racist tropes that sadly still pervade the fashion industry. 

The story told by Story Teller, then, is the same one being told in numerous magazines across the world, though perhaps here regaled in more dulcet tones and with a more florid vocabulary. Ultimately, however, it is all style and no substance. This does not mean that it is not captivating, simply that its charms are limited. Walker’s photographs are visual candyfloss: frothy wisps of coloured nothing, puffed up to grand proportions, they dissolve under the slightest scrutiny – but that is not to say that the momentary sugar rush doesn’t have its appeal. 

Interview: Sir Paul Nurse

0

About 50 years ago, sometime after bedtime, a small blonde-haired boy was running maniacally down a street in north London. He was (bear with me here) chasing a flying Soviet dog. He sprinted to the end of the road, panting, as his quarry, hundreds of miles above him, cruised inexorably towards the horizon. Half a century later, the flying canine in question is revered as the first animal to orbit the world – and its spellbound admirer has become the preeminent scientist in Britain.

About 50 years ago, sometime after bedtime, a small blonde-haired boy was running maniacally down a street in north London. He was (bear with me here) chasing a flying Soviet dog. He sprinted to the end of the road, panting, as his quarry, hundreds of miles above him, cruised inexorably towards the horizon. Half a century later, the flying canine in question is revered as the first animal to orbit the world – and its spellbound admirer has become the preeminent scientist in Britain.
There is something engagingly innocent about Sir Paul Nurse, who is determined to tell me that, ever since his space-dog-chasing days, he’s never properly grown up. “Scientists live a prolonged childlike existence,” he enthuses. “I have a passion to know things.”
Childlike or not, I’m convinced that this man might be vaguely superhuman. Variously director of the Rockefeller University, Cancer Research UK, and Oxford’s microbiology labs, he’s been earnestly revolutionising cell biology since 1976 (coolly accepting the Nobel Prize in the process). He is a successor to Newton and Wren as President of the Royal Society, and – almost outrageously – just happens to be in charge of the largest biomedical centre this side of the States.
Small wonder, then, that when I ask which scientific luminary he feels the greatest affinity with, Nurse is particularly enthusiastic about the 19th-century polymath Erasmus Darwin, grandfather to Charles. “I just really like being close to the production of new knowledge,” he says, simply.
Under the smiling exterior, this is a man with a steely vision. And he talks like a prophet. “We’re on the precipice of a new Enlightenment,” he muses, a theme he’s increasingly warmed to in recent months. In a major lecture early this year, he spoke candidly of building a new society inspired by science. “I had just had major surgery, but it was extremely important to get out and say this. Scientists are not getting out there enough. I’m getting a bit ancient, and I have to give something back. That’s my job: providing circumstances for others to have their Eureka moments.”
As he predicts the coming scientific utopia, I wonder if he sees himself as at the frontline of a grand social project, an ongoing programme of cultural awakening to the wonders of black holes and ethidium bromide. He certainly knows who the enemy are. “Some would say we’re suffering a little bit of a Romantic backlash. There’s been some loss of optimism since the ’60s.” He mentions the opposition to genetic modification, with a bewildered grimace. “But,” he says diplomatically, “the Romantics always have something to contribute too.”
This isn’t the narrow scientism of a test tube fanatic. When I ask whether the fashionable emphasis on the so-called STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering, and maths) is a little one-dimensional, he lights up spiritedly. “It would be a great mistake to crowd out the humanities,” he says, visibly concerned. “They tell us what it is to be human. The humanities need to be intertwined with science. I believe that science is the art of the soluble, and the solutions to the big questions” – consciousness gets a mention – “must take account of the humanities. Science is impinging more and more on areas that have traditionally been theological.”
But is any knowledge sacrosanct – or too explosive to touch? “The acquisition of knowledge has got to be a good thing,” he remarks, bluntly. “It’s naïve to think you can stop it. Trying to impede it smells to me of tokenism and pandering. I’m of the liberal view that the way it’s used is what matters.”
For a high-profile scientist, Nurse is surprisingly direct about politics. American healthcare, he declares unexpectedly, “is a disgrace to civilisation”, while, on the other side of the globe, Chinese scientists are stymied by the overbearing state: “For science to prosper, it has to be a free society.” Closer to home, he laments the fact that the grim “realities of power” seem to have guillotined the Coalition’s lofty green ambitions.
But he reserves a bit of rare venom for those that seek to contaminate science with ideology, especially on environmental issues: “Because climate change requires global action, this naturally removes power and responsibility from individuals and the nation-state. There are some decisions that are counter to a more radical free-market approach. The sceptics don’t like that sort of supra-government action, so they don’t let the science speak for itself.”
I ask what a President Romney would mean for the world (election day was yet to strike). “Yeah,” he says incredibly slowly, gazing grimly out of the window. I get a faint suspicion he isn’t a fan. “The man just seems to want power. He’s got no vision. It’s just a big question mark.”
Science, for Paul Nurse, represents a sort of chaotic purity. “I think anarchy is pretty important in science, because what comes of anarchy is a sort of scepticism. We should encourage anarchy – but that must go along with consensus. You need both. I believe in the power of rationality and critical debate. We are a very creative species. I am fundamentally optimistic about the power of human will combined with curiosity.”
What about the life of Sir Paul, I ask? What’s it like being an oracle? “Terrible.” He looks somewhere between amused and exasperated. “The Nobel title gives you an aura of infallibility. It’s a pretty heavy responsibility. Actually, it’s quite papal.”
The Sun recently described this nonchalantly modest Nobel laureate as “the David Beckham of science”. So who comes off best in the comparison? He laughs disarmingly, and fishes for a suitably self-deprecating remark. “I do. Beckham’s definitely got a better hairdo.”
As I walk back down the vast marble stairs, I hear a call from somewhere above me. The President of the Royal Society has bounced illustriously back into view. “There’s something I forgot to mention,” he says, peering down from an ornate stone balcony. “There’s one thing I really loved about Oxford.” He pauses theatrically. “The students.” What’s not to like about this man?

There is something engagingly innocent about Sir Paul Nurse, who is determined to tell me that, ever since his space-dog-chasing days, he’s never properly grown up. “Scientists live a prolonged childlike existence,” he enthuses. “I have a passion to know things.”

Childlike or not, I’m convinced that this man might be vaguely superhuman. Variously director of the Rockefeller University, Cancer Research UK, and Oxford’s microbiology labs, he’s been earnestly revolutionising cell biology since 1976 (coolly accepting the Nobel Prize in the process). He is a successor to Newton and Wren as President of the Royal Society, and – almost outrageously – just happens to be in charge of the largest biomedical centre this side of the States.

Small wonder, then, that when I ask which scientific luminary he feels the greatest affinity with, Nurse is particularly enthusiastic about the 19th-century polymath Erasmus Darwin, grandfather to Charles. “I just really like being close to the production of new knowledge,” he says, simply.

Under the smiling exterior, this is a man with a steely vision. And he talks like a prophet. “We’re on the precipice of a new Enlightenment,” he muses, a theme he’s increasingly warmed to in recent months. In a major lecture early this year, he spoke candidly of building a new society inspired by science. “I had just had major surgery, but it was extremely important to get out and say this. Scientists are not getting out there enough. I’m getting a bit ancient, and I have to give something back. That’s my job: providing circumstances for others to have their Eureka moments.”

As he predicts the coming scientific utopia, I wonder if he sees himself as at the frontline of a grand social project, an ongoing programme of cultural awakening to the wonders of black holes and ethidium bromide. He certainly knows who the enemy are. “Some would say we’re suffering a little bit of a Romantic backlash. There’s been some loss of optimism since the ’60s.” He mentions the opposition to genetic modification, with a bewildered grimace. “But,” he says diplomatically, “the Romantics always have something to contribute too.”

This isn’t the narrow scientism of a test tube fanatic. When I ask whether the fashionable emphasis on the so-called STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering, and maths) is a little one-dimensional, he lights up spiritedly. “It would be a great mistake to crowd out the humanities,” he says, visibly concerned. “They tell us what it is to be human. The humanities need to be intertwined with science. I believe that science is the art of the soluble, and the solutions to the big questions” – consciousness gets a mention – “must take account of the humanities. Science is impinging more and more on areas that have traditionally been theological.”

But is any knowledge sacrosanct – or too explosive to touch? “The acquisition of knowledge has got to be a good thing,” he remarks, bluntly. “It’s naïve to think you can stop it. Trying to impede it smells to me of tokenism and pandering. I’m of the liberal view that the way it’s used is what matters.

”For a high-profile scientist, Nurse is surprisingly direct about politics. American healthcare, he declares unexpectedly, “is a disgrace to civilisation”, while, on the other side of the globe, Chinese scientists are stymied by the overbearing state: “For science to prosper, it has to be a free society.” Closer to home, he laments the fact that the grim “realities of power” seem to have guillotined the Coalition’s lofty green ambitions.

But he reserves a bit of rare venom for those that seek to contaminate science with ideology, especially on environmental issues: “Because climate change requires global action, this naturally removes power and responsibility from individuals and the nation-state. There are some decisions that are counter to a more radical free-market approach. The sceptics don’t like that sort of supra-government action, so they don’t let the science speak for itself.

”I ask what a President Romney would mean for the world (election day was yet to strike). “Yeah,” he says incredibly slowly, gazing grimly out of the window. I get a faint suspicion he isn’t a fan. “The man just seems to want power. He’s got no vision. It’s just a big question mark.”Science, for Paul Nurse, represents a sort of chaotic purity. “I think anarchy is pretty important in science, because what comes of anarchy is a sort of scepticism. We should encourage anarchy – but that must go along with consensus. You need both. I believe in the power of rationality and critical debate. We are a very creative species. I am fundamentally optimistic about the power of human will combined with curiosity.”

What about the life of Sir Paul, I ask? What’s it like being an oracle? “Terrible.” He looks somewhere between amused and exasperated. “The Nobel title gives you an aura of infallibility. It’s a pretty heavy responsibility. Actually, it’s quite papal.”

The Sun recently described this nonchalantly modest Nobel laureate as “the David Beckham of science”. So who comes off best in the comparison? He laughs disarmingly, and fishes for a suitably self-deprecating remark. “I do. Beckham’s definitely got a better hairdo.”

As I walk back down the vast marble stairs, I hear a call from somewhere above me. The President of the Royal Society has bounced illustriously back into view. “There’s something I forgot to mention,” he says, peering down from an ornate stone balcony. “There’s one thing I really loved about Oxford.” He pauses theatrically. “The students.” What’s not to like about this man?

Hugh Grant steals hearts at Hertford

0

Hugh Grant took part in a debate at Hertford College over the state of the press in Britain.The debate was part of an event entitled ‘The Press We Deserve’, which was held on the afternoon of Sunday 18th November.

Hugh Grant has been involved in a
debate at Hertford College over the
state of the press in Britain.
The debate took place as part of an
event entitled ‘The Press We Deserve’,
which was held on the afternoon of
Sunday 18th November.
The debate was conducted as a
response to the ongoing Leveson
Inquiry. Lord Justice Leveson is due
to report on the “culture, ethics and
practices” of the British Press at the
end of the month.
Hugh Grant famously appeared
at the inquiry, claiming that he had
viewed papers such as the News of
the World as “harmless fun” until
he was “increasingly scandalised”
by the “toxic” reporting methods of
various newspapers.
Grant said that a series of untrue
allegations were made against him
and described an occasion when
his flat had been broken into by
journalists.
Rachel Pickering, JCR President at
Hertford, felt that it was “good that
Hugh chose to defend the rights of
the general public to privacy from
the media rather than focusing on
the negative impact the media has
had on his personal life and other
celebrities’ lives.”
Alongside Grant, other panel
members included the Principals
of Hertford and Mansfield Colleges,
as well as Paul Connew, the former
Editor of the Sunday Mirror and of
the News of the World. Bill Heine,
a radio presenter for BBC Oxford,
chaired the debate.
In a statement to Cherwell, Will
Hutton, Principal of Hertford
College, stated, “The mood was pro-
Leveson and anxious to secure a more
genuinely publicly spirited press.”
He also noted that participants were
“anxious to guard against risks of
state interference with free speech.”
Baroness Kennedy, who is
currently Principal of Mansfield
College, stated, “Everyone is of one
view – something has to be done.”
She went on to contest the idea
that the issue is clouded by public
right to knowledge or freedom of the
press.
She commented, “I want a vibrant
press. I want strong investigative
journalism. I took no delight in the
closing of News of the World. We
need lots of papers covering all sorts
of stuff.
‘But feasting on people’s misery
after the death of a child or digging
up dirt on a dead soldier son is
ghoulish and vile. It is about profit at
the expense of people.’
A finalist at Hertford said, “Helena
Kennedy is just great and it was
nice to hear Hugh talking about
something he’s obviously really
passionate about.”
However, some students seemed
more excited by the presence of
Hugh Grant at the debate than the
issues being discussed. First year
undergraduate at Hertford Joy Aston
recalled, “Hugh Grant was extremely
exciting, especially when he put his
arm around me for the photo, and
said that it was ‘nice to meet me’
and ‘hoped I had a good night’. Also
he was a fantastic speaker and the
debate was very interesting.”
Baroness described Hugh Grant’s
performance at the debate as
“impressive”.
Nevertheless, James Harrison, a
local publisher who attended the
event, felt that the quality of the
debate was inconsistent. He claimed
that the debate “seemed to veer from
occasionally muffled and indistinct
acoustics (and thought processes)
to stunningly simple and heartfelt
comments that cut through to the
heart of the problem and to the
solution.
‘Having Hugh Grant up close and
at his disarming best was a bit of a
bonus!”
Grant was available after the main
debate for an open conversation
with Mr Hutton, and 100 spaces

The debate was conducted as a response to the ongoing Leveson Inquiry. Lord Justice Leveson is due to report on the “culture, ethics and practices” of the British Press at the end of the month.

Hugh Grant famously appeared at the inquiry, claiming that he had viewed papers such as the News of the World as “harmless fun” until he was “increasingly scandalised” by the “toxic” reporting methods of various newspapers

Grant said that a series of untrue allegations were made against him and described an occasion when his flat had been broken into by journalists.

Rachel Pickering, JCR President at Hertford, felt that it was “good that Hugh chose to defend the rights of the general public to privacy from the media rather than focusing on the negative impact the media has had on his personal life and othe rcelebrities’ lives.”

Alongside Grant, other panel members included the Principals of Hertford and Mansfield Colleges, as well as Paul Connew, the former Editor of the Sunday Mirror and of the News of the World. Bill Heine, a radio presenter for BBC Oxford, chaired the debate.

In a statement to Cherwell, Will Hutton, Principal of Hertford College, stated, “The mood was pro-Leveson and anxious to secure a more genuinely publicly-spirited press.” He also noted that participants were “anxious to guard against risks of state interference with free speech.”

Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, who is currently Principal of Mansfield College, stated, “Everyone is of one view – something has to be done.”

She went on to contest the idea that the issue is clouded by public right to knowledge or freedom of the press. She commented, “I want a vibrant press. I want strong investigative journalism. I took no delight in the closing of News of the World. We need lots of papers covering all sorts of stuff.

‘But feasting on people’s misery after the death of a child or digging up dirt on a dead soldier son is ghoulish and vile. It is about profit at the expense of people.’

A finalist at Hertford said, “Helena Kennedy is just great and it was nice to hear Hugh talking about something he’s obviously really passionate about.”

However, some students seemed more excited by the presence of Hugh Grant at the debate than the issues being discussed. Joy Aston, a first year undergraduate at Hertford, said, “Hugh Grant was extremely exciting, especially when he put his arm around me for the photo, and said that it was ‘nice to meet me ‘and ‘hoped I had a good night’. Also he was a fantastic speaker and the debate was very interesting.”

Kennedy described Hugh Grant’s performance at the debate as “impressive”. Nevertheless, James Harrison, a local publisher who attended the event, felt that the quality of the debate was inconsistent.

He claimed that the debate “seemed to veer from occasionally muffled and indistinct acoustics (and thought processes) to stunningly simple and heartfelt comments that cut through to the heart of the problem and to the solution.

‘Having Hugh Grant up close and at his disarming best was a bit of a bonus!”

After the main debate, Grant had an open conversation with Mr Hutton, with 100 spaces made available for people to attend it.

Photoshoot: Siren

0

SIREN
MODEL SOPHIE STAUNTON
DIRECTOR/PHOTOGRAPHER DANIELLA SHREIR
ASSISTED BY MELANIE GURNEY

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%6372%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%6374%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%6375%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%6376%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%6377%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%6378%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%6379%%[/mm-hide-text]