**Cherwell Tries: Quidditch – June 2013**
Quidditch is certainly one of Oxford’s quirkier phenomenons. How did a sport from Harry Potter become a sport in reality?
**Cherwell Tries: Quidditch – June 2013**
Quidditch is certainly one of Oxford’s quirkier phenomenons. How did a sport from Harry Potter become a sport in reality?
Magdalen hosted St Catherine’s in the 5th Week of the JCR Premier Division, with both teams looking for an important victory in much contrasting circumstances. Having conceded 9 and thus scored 0 so far, the home team were desperately in need of a win to kick-start some kind of turnaround to what has proved a disastrous start to the season. Catz, on the other hand, were looking to keep the pressure up on first-placed Exeter with another 3 points.
The game started as a scrappy affair, with Catz unable to assert control due to dogged harassment from the Magdalen midfielders. As the first half drew to a close the Catz pressure mounted but Magdalen coped admirably, particularly with the aerial bombardment from Kevin Weiss – Catz’s answer to Rory Delap.Eventually, in the second half, Magdalen resistance was broken: Joe Davies got round the defence to slide a square ball across to a predatory Chris Lambert, who tapped into an empty net from 3 yards out. 20 minutes later Davies got the reward his endeavours deserved when James Gibson floated a perfect cross into the box for the Catz striker to head home.
The result leaves Catz with 9 points from 4 games, sitting in second place behind Exeter, who continued their perfect start with a 3-0 win against Wadham. Magdalen remain bottom, but they should take heart from a gritty performance that shows there’s still hope of avoiding relegation.
Premier Division pace-setters Exeter continued their impressive start to the season as they stormed to a comfortable 3-0 victory over defending champions Wadham. Despite the absence of influential ex-captain and centre-back, Chris Bennett (denied the chance to break his personal scoring duck stretching to 1060 minutes), Exeter produced another resolute defensive display to ensure they enter their crunch Cuppers tie against Worcester next week full of confidence.
The first half was a tight affair, with Exeter shading the early exchanges as Blues player Ben May crashed a 35-yard strike against the crossbar via the keeper’s fingers. Adam Halewood then created a couple of chances but a cross eluded strike partner Charles Cooper and another effort was prodded wide. Wadham’s best chance came just before the break but birthday boy Jack O’Mahoney was alert and tipped an effort onto the post.
The referee was keen to start the second half quickly and it was Exeter who were fastest out of the blocks. Ten minutes after the break, assist king Manesh Mistry took his personal tally for the season to 12 with a cross that found Cooper who then beat the approaching Wadham keeper to the ball and nodded it into the open net. Wadham created occasional chances on the break but the new centre-back partnership of Dale and Sandy Clark held firm.Exeter were denied a strong penalty shot when Halewood was fouled in the box.
However, soon after, and only 15 minutes from full time, Ben May kept up his impressive record of scoring in every game. An incisive through ball from Cooper allowed May to casually round the keeper and a defender on the line to seal the win.Exeter fans will be hoping this impressive victory gives their team vital momentum for next Friday’s mouthwatering Cuppers showdown, giving themselves a great chance of an historic double.They are certainly in a very strong position at present, especially with the much-anticipated Lincoln verses Worcester match being postponed due to a waterlogged pitch.
On a cold, bleak Sunday afternoon, the Rugby Blues played the Russian national team. In some ways, it was a slightly implausible game. A group of students who are squeezing rugby in between studies took on a hardened group of professionals and came perilously close to victory. It was a performance of such heroism and tenacity that even stoic coach James Wade looked pleased, or at least slightly less grumpy, with the team’s magnificent efforts.As the Russians ran out, your humble author, who plays 2nds at the rugby club and so knows the lads well, was more than a little concerned.
Their two props had more meat on their thighs than a well-stocked butcher and the number 8’s biceps were the size of a normal man’s torso. Their faces seemed to indicate that breaking one another’s noses formed a core part of the Russian training program.Early on, these fears appeared justified. A try to the Russians in the first five minutes indicated that the Blues might be in for a long afternoon. However, some astute kicking from fly-half Charlie Marr gave the Blues good field position and put the Russians under considerable pressure.
Marr, alas, was unable to convert some tricky penalties over the first 30 minutes.But the best was yet to come. A delightful back-line move, designed by backs coach and former Blue James Gaunt, opened the Russians up. Cass Braham-Law sliced through the line before passing to fresher winger Henry Lamont. Lamont, who boasts a sublime left-foot step, literally turned the Russian full-back inside-out before diving over.The Blues entered half-time 12-10 down and there was a palpable sense of optimism.
Unfortunately, the Russians scored a couple of quick tries after the break through their monstrous forward pack and surged to 29 points. The Blues scored another exceptional try through full-back Jonathan Hudson to make the final score 29-15.The Blues had worked the ball back-and-forth across the pitch and again opened the Russians up out wide. Gav Turner, Braham-Law and Lamont were heavily involved.New hooker Nick Gardiner, whose ball-running and improbably large backside have proved a boon for the club, won Man of the Match. Not to undermine his courageous efforts, but it was a little like picking the most valiant of the 300 at Thermopylae.
Captain John Carter was magnificent and put in some thunderous hits on the Russian forwards. In terms of sheer physicality, Captain Carter, a former professional at Sale, was one of the few Blues players who could match their Russian counterparts for size. Prop Bob Baker, who played at Wasps last year, was another who continually drove the Russians back over the gain line. Second-rower Will Rowlands, unlucky to miss last year’s Varsity, was similarly immense.
In the backs, Braham-Law was superb in attack and defence, as was Hee Won-Cho on the wing.Alas, there were a few low moments for OURFC over the weekend: scrum-half Sam Egerton’s blue head-band to keep his increasingly awful pony-tail in check; team manager Tim Stevens mangling various Russian names as they scored; and the Greyhounds (2nd XV) getting pummelled 83-14 by a very good Welsh team.All in all though, a triumphant a weekend for the Blues and one that bodes well for the Varsity game on the 6th December at Twickenham.
You know things are bad when you’re being out-knowledged by your dad about sport. Years of carefully cultivating an image as the sports-obsessive, the one that really cares about knowing his onions rather than just being a partisan, wiped out in a second when he knew more about the new boys in the England cricket team (young Joe Root, it will take years of consistent century-scoring for me to forgive the humiliation you’ve indirectly caused me) than me. “I thought you were supposed to be interested in sport?”
I did, and do, take a bit of pride in staying up on things in the wide world of sport.
But it’s tricky at university. Possibly it’s because at home there’s simply less to do, or less to do that’s within a five minute amble of where you’re sleeping. I get through hours and hours of sport at home in my own version of what a friend once termed his Living Room Stadium (capacity 4, with unretractable roof).There’s less of an opportunity cost – it’s the Heineken Cup or a nap on most Sundays – and it’s also accumulative: once you’ve got back into it you want to keep it up. Quality control and triage also giddily plummet southward, and I’ll suddenly find myself watching a Carling Cup match I have no stake in whatsoever.
When I’m back in Oxford, however, between the work, the actual playing of sport, the fun and the Torschlusspanik (look it up), there doesn’t seem to be time for anything more than a weekly couple of Premiership games and possibly the odd international rugby game. This is also to do with timing, though: in a fairly relaxed 8th week of Michaelmas one could potter in to watch it start, either from an evening’s work or a night out. The only thing you had to sacrifice was the resource everyone here thinks they can do without: sleep.Normally though, it doesn’t quite work like that. Cup finals could well clash with your own finals. What to do?
At least the feast-and-famine routine between term and holidays is only temporary.Moreover, there’s a vast amount of sporting opportunities here aside from sitting in a pub watching the great and the good play on the telly. Rarely will any of us be able to play as much regular sport as this again so easily; at whatever level of rigour you desire, be it ramshackle reserves football or 19 year olds tackling 30-year old lumps of Siberian granite in the Blues vs Russia rugby game, or a United game at the Kassam. Also, perhaps best of all, you’ll sometimes get to write about it.
The Oxford team looked relaxed and in good spirits warming up, as I set up stall pitchside with the few hardened hockey fans who braved the sharp winds down at Iffley Road. Talk of that evening’s crew date and past encounters brightened up an otherwise chilly afternoon, while, on the other side of the pitch, the Cardiff Metropolitan boom box kicked into action to get their own warm up started.
The Blues were looking to capitalise upon their good form and undefeated start in the Southern Hockey League to invigorate their BUCS campaign, which had seen them pick up an impressive four points from their first three games. But this would not be easy, as they were up against an energetic Cardiff team who came to Oxford on the back of a solid result against Bath and were hoping to pick up more points on the road in their third consecutive away fixture.
The Blues started the game well with some good early pressure and quick play down the wing by LMH’s Paul Bennett. This led to a penalty corner, which was duly converted by Alex Stobbart. Another penalty corner quickly followed as the Blues looked to double their advantage, and Stobbart was unlucky to see his shot just knocked wide of the goal.
They continued to pile on the pressure, and a good through pass, by captain Oliver Lobo, was tapped on to Tom Mullins in space at the edge of the circle, and he easily dealt with the bouncing ball to find the top left corner. 2-0 up after just 13 minutes played; it was Cardiff, rather than Oxford, who were looking decidedly blue this 5th week.Cardiff got their first chance with a debatable penalty corner a few minutes later, but were denied by a good save.
After this, the game began to settle down with both sides trying to utilise space and width with some long passing and expansive hockey. Oxford’s third goal, scored by Tom Jackson from another penalty corner after 19 minutes, as well as more examples of excellent goalkeeping created visible frustration amongst the maroon-clad Cardiffians and tempers began to fray after a few contentious decisions.
The visitors were also unable to challenge the scorers despite a decent spell of possession after the third Oxford goal. Exeter College’s Joe Mills made some well-timed tackles and interceptions in defence to maintain Oxford’s advantage and the Blues were absorbing the pressure well. With this in mind, Cardiff probably deserved the overruling of their initially disallowed goal just before the end of the first half, and, with 3-1 the score-line at half-time, neither side could complain.Oxford started the second half scrappily, whilst Cardiff were obviously keen to add to their late first half goal and were rewarded for their efforts with a penalty corner after just 2 minutes.
The resulting shot was again saved by the Blues keeper but an unlucky ricochet led to another penalty which he was, this time, unable to prevent. The Cardiff forward sent the ball high into the roof of the net to make it 3-2, with half an hour still to play. This quick goal seemed to wake up the Blues, and they once again probed the Cardiff defence with some testing passes and quick shots.As the half progressed, fatigue was evident on both sides and wayward passing and stick control meant that neither side really gained any kind of momentum.
Dark clouds moved in overhead as the game entered the last 20 minutes and Oxford found themselves pushed onto the back foot by Cardiff’s increased efforts for an equalizer. A penalty corner with eight minutes remaining proved fruitless too, and despite looking dangerous through the middle, one got the feeling that it just wasn’t going to be their day. When Stobbart dribbled smoothly around the keeper, to make it 4-2 to Oxford, as the game entered the last 5 minutes, the result was all but confirmed.In the end, the result was perhaps a bit flattering to the Blues but they were rewarded for a strong first half performance.
Having said that, they will need to cut out the sluggishness that Cardiff capitalised on so easily if they are to continue their winning streak against upcoming opponents in the BUCS.
I was intrigued to be lured into the woods of Trinity one chilly November night, with instructions only ‘to bring a coat’.
But I couldn’t have thought of a more appropriate form of invitation to O Human Child, which is dark and primal, with the plot revolving around the luring away and initiation of a child in a paganistic fairy ritual. I couldn’t help feeling like that child.
The writer and director Tara Isabella Burton draws both on great literature – Yeats (who gives the play its title), Shakespeare, Keats – and the physical theatre of Punch Drunk to create an intriguing high Romantic mashup. The cast list is divided into ‘Fairies’ and ‘Mortals’, with the former taunting, controlling and seducing the humans throughout the play. All of the characters spend the whole 90 minutes on stage, leaving the viewer free to wander around various plots and sub-plots, occasionally being dragged into the action, and fed ‘Fairy fruits’ (grapes, apparently).
These sub-plots give the play a constant tension, as the lovers circle each other, some in grape-induced passion, others in confusion and rage. Throughout the play, the sound of human emotion bubbles up – screams, giggles, cackles, growls, groans, moans. This cacophony was led by Emma D’arcy, as Puck, with a raucous, vitriolic laugh. She shone throughout. This primal soundtrack meshes well with the physical theatre – the pack of fairies that constantly dog the human characters, and the terrifying convulsions of Thomas Bailey’s Knight as he is thrown across the stage by the Fairy Queen (Hannah-Kate Kelly). Unfortunately, it sometimes fails to interact with the poetic language of the script. At one point the Fairies discourse in impeccable Shakespearean tones, as the ritual destruction of the child’s doll takes place at their feet in a howling gaggle.
Occasionally, the script itself seems to lack cohesion, with the plot sometimes difficult to untangle (though I was only shown a sample of the scenes). One actor acknowledged that they were thinking of introducing a narrator role, to explain the plot to the audience, but it is difficult to see this working without breaking the intensity and immersion of the experience, which is the real strength of this production. At one point, the play introduces a story within a story, which was compellingly told and acted, but seemed like a rather clunky way of introducing Rossetti’s ‘Goblin Market’.
All that is forgotten when Leonie Nicks, as the Fairy King strides across the stage, dominant and implacable, to drive the Fairies to frenzy. As soon as Puck, the King and their Fairies lead the action again, complemented by rather than accompanying the script, the play’s vitality shines through again. Luckily, the director has allowed this to happen throughout most of the play. So despite some lack of cohesion, the emotional intensity on show here should be reason enough to allow yourself to be lured into this Bacchanal ritual.
FOUR STARS
O Human Child will be perfomed at the Moser Theatre during 6th Week
So, Oxford gets another piece of new writing in the Burton Taylor Studio. But for a change, it isn’t terrible. In fact, Life Sentence is rather good. The play is centred on Theo, a hypochondriac who has been diagnosed with immortality. Naturally the man’s horrified, and after a friend organises a party to cheer him up, which goes dismally wrong, Theo stages his own funeral. This in turn goes dismally wrong, and then… Well, I’ve sworn not to give away the ending
There are some weighty themes here, but the writing doesn’t overdo them. It has a lightness and deftness of touch, so it doesn’t stagnate into some oh-so-deep-and-meaningful exposition of the thoughts of a twenty year old who is oh-so-utterly crippled by the size of his own intelligence. Life Sentence is funny too. You may not end up doubled over in laughter, but you’ll have a smile on your face throughout. Who knew immortality could be so amusing?
The script has its faults, of course. The principal one I saw was that the relationship between Theo and Michelle, a friend of his, was too ferociously argumentative to believe, but we can probably pardon Jamie Carragher that. He has done an excellent job overall. The cast is of eight. In the preview, we only see three of them in action. For a fortnight before the opening night, they were shaping up well.
The doctor (who makes the dreadful diagnosis) is played by Charlie Dennis. Both in terms of the writing and the acting, the character is a little absurd, but only a fraction more so than your G.P. on an off day. He’s not exactly believable, but he’s well-rounded, and Dennis is playing him excellently. Charlie Daniels plays Michelle, Theo’s friend and something of a love interest for him (which is awkward, because she’s actually dating another one of Theo’s friends). It was a solid performance. Her movements seem simultaneously both lithe and stiff, and she embodies the long suffering friend well.
But ultimately, Michelle and the doctor are not lead roles, and so it is a shame that Nick Lyons, who plays Theo, was the least competent of the three. The director, Jack Herlihy, wants Theo not to be a timid hypochondriac; he wants Theo to be a vigorous attention seeker. I commend this, but Lyons’s reactions are simply not believable. Nobody, however much he wants others to feel sorry for his every illness, would immediately be outraged at being diagnosed with immortality. His relationship with Michelle also strains at one’s suspension of disbelief.
The writing is superb: it straddles the line between comedy and seriousness perfectly. It is still being performed in the Burton Taylor, so don’t go in the hope of any spectacle. Expenditure on set and costumes looks set to be minimal. That said, they did promise a coffin on stage…
THREE STARS
See Life Sentence for yourself at the Burton Taylor, it plays from Tuesday 13th – Saturday 17th November and is £5 for students.
Tim Key is an unusual comedian. His shows, which have at their centre Key reading his own poems, have at last made poetry funny. And yet he remains something of an anti-comedian. Despite having accomplished much that would count as traditional success: he has had his poems published in a book but also in publications as (and we must suspect comically) diverse as Vice and Reader’s Digest, has featured on TV shows from the glamorous heights of Newswipe and Screenwipe to the pitiful low of Skins (ah, the regrettable ‘down-with-the-kids’ cameo), and has written a fair deal for Radio 4. His comedy goes against standard stand-up. He delivers his poems (one of which has been written for Cherwell, to our great honour – see below) with a beer in hand off the back of a pornographic postcard and his poetic persona seems to have little care for the audience. His poems themselves play off poetry: they bounce against its pretension and incomprehensibility. His poetry takes the piss out of poetry.
Key’s career has, from the start, line between the comedy establishment and anti-establishment. Playing a crucial part in the greatest success of the footlights since the Hugh Laurie, Stephen Fry and Emma Thompson days, where he and his group won the Best New Comedy Award at the Fringe, Key was nonetheless not a member of the University and had to blag his way in as a Russian grad student. Likewise, despite his three sold-out Edinburgh shows and winning of the Edinburgh comedy award, he remains a figure to the side of the limelight, his name not as well known as many less critically acclaimed comics. He has worked with Steve Coogan, Charlie Brooker and Armando Ianucci, and yet he has managed to keep his comedy unique and maintain his own influence as an individual comic. He blends genres, parodying art-house film on stage instead of more banal videos, and includes physical comedy in his shows. Is he an anti-poet and anti-comedian? And should we seen him as a poet being funny or a comedian writing comic verse and performing it? Cherwell has asked the man himself about the line between comedy, poetry, and more.
How did you get into comedy?
I auditioned for a pantomime. It was very badly written – by Alex Horne – and I was terrible in it – my great aunt walked out. But I loved doing it. And at some point I think I made someone laugh and got a surge of joy and primeval power that I decided I needed more of. Me and Alex Horne have worked together ever since. He’s getting better.
When did you decide you wanted to work as a comedian?
2000. I’d graduated from Sheffield and waddled home to Cambridge, fatigued and directionless. I applied for some jobs and started temping. I got involved in the above pantomime and met some people who were doing comedy. I muscled in.
What role did being at University have on your development comically, does any of the Russian that you studied come into the works?
I did plays in my first year and liked it. That kept my onstage attention-seeking side ticking over. Russian writers can be funny. Dostoevsky’s The Double was amazing – stayed with me – and [Nikolai] Gogol is still very funny. I’ve just made a radio documentary about him because I love him. He was a sneaky piece of shit, not boring like some olden-days writers.
Did you always know you wanted to be a comedian?
I always had a pang that I needed to do something like this. I didn’t know what. But I think if I wasn’t doing it I’d still have that pang. If I was doing something else I would be drinking wine and writing late into the night. I’d be watching more comedy. I’d be jealous that I wasn’t involved.
Would you say Cambridge was a unique environment to be involved in comically?
Difficult to say. Other universities have some comedy, but it did feel pretty vibrant. And there was some amazing talent there. Also, it was an environment where people could try out some stuff and see if it was funny – with an audience. That’s invaluable. It makes doing comedy that much more worthwhile when there are some goons watching you.
How does it compare to Oxford, is there a difference between Oxford comics and those that come from Cambridge?
Nope, don’t think so. It’s all about getting in a room with a few people with a similar sense of humour. I met Tom Basden, Lloyd Woolf and Stefan Golaszewski through Cambridge and it came clear that we all had a similar approach and similar taste. After that it has nothing to do with which city you’re in – we migrated to London and got busy. I’m sure this sort of thing happens in Oxford too.
Did you ever write serious poetry?
I think I do. I sometimes write about orphanages and love. I’m trying to be serious in some of those cases.
How do you feel about other comedians being influenced by your work with poetry?
Flattering! I wouldn’t recommend it though. And they mustn‘t overtake me. That would be rude.
Were you inspired by any particular poets?
Daniil Kharms. I read him at university and loved him. He’s off the hook. I know some of that’s slid into my work.
How do you feel more generally about the state of comedy in the UK?
I think there’s some good stuff. Difficult to generalise though as I don’t watch ‘enough’ of it. But there’s a lot of people I love. Daniel Kitson, Nina Conti. Tim Vine, Alex Horne. And new guys. Sheeps are amazing. But to be fair I don’t watch much. It sickens you after a while.
Tim’s poem for Cherwell
before his death.
I need to read more editions of
Cherwell.I’d like to meet a few more famous
people too including the woman
from The Killing.
I’d like to go camping with her and
cook with her and read the paper
together.
Just the two of us.
Leafing through the paper.
Starting fires with it.
Laughing.
Student productions of musicals are often tolerable, at best, and despite the effective marketing campaign which is currently dominating Oxford, I wasn’t sure if A Little Night Music would live up to the hype. However, even cooped up in Somerville Chapel, without the large space of The Oxford Playhouse to work with, the cast give a captivating performance. Whilst many directors may settle for great actors with passable singing voices, or terrific singers who can also memorise lines, Griffith Rees has managed to find a talented cast whose vocal and acting ability is extremely impressive.
The first scene they show us is an ensemble musical number from the first act, and with the addition of the magnificent student orchestra, it is thoroughly enjoyable. The musical tells the story of the interwoven romantic lives of glamorous couples among the Swedish elite. Most prominent is the affair between the glamorous Desiree Armfeldt (Georgina Hellier) and Count Carl-Magnus (Aleksandr Cvetkovic). Hellier gives a particularly confident performance as the conniving temptress and works well with Cvetkovic, who commands the stage as the demanding and impatient Count. The chemistry between the two makes theirs scenes engaging, especially when they are joined by Armfledt’s other lover, Fredrik Egerman, played by the amusing Richard Hill. Furthermore, all three actors find more humour in the musical than you would expect, and Hellier manages to make Armfledt’s duplicity hilarious, whilst Cvetkovic makes Carl-Magnus’ stubborn ignorance particularly entertaining.
Furthermore, there are many other commendable performances as Claire Parry’s sarcastic and dry wit, matched with her delightful singing voice makes her performance as Charlotte, Carl-Magnus’ mistreated wife, enthralling. Whilst I only saw a few scenes involving Madame Armfeldt (Natasha Heliotis) who majestically controls the romantic liaisons, that which I did see was riveting as Heliotis’ powerful stage presence, and range of facial expressions, allows her to dominate the stage, even when sat in the background. The cast are joined by the Liebeslieder, who act as a chorus, narrating the play and engendering the scene transition and the spectacular singing voices of Anjali Joseph and David Kell stand out as they resound throughout the chapel.
Of course, there are a view hitches. A couple of flat notes, and missed cues, but this does not detract from an otherwise aurally enchanting and generally entertaining performance. Rees’ vision as the director is clear, and the snippets of scenes that I saw left me wanting more. Despite the fact that they were only rehearsals, the strong performance of the cast made it clear that A Little Night Music will definitely be one of the unmissable shows of this term.
FOUR STARS
A Little Night Music will be showing from Wednesday 14th to Saturday 17th November at the Oxford Playhouse.
Have you ever heard a laptop orchestra? However advanced your tastes, chances are this hasn’t yet formed part of your musical experience-bank.
On Friday 23rd November, you’ll get your chance with the much-anticipated debut performance of OxLORK, the university laptop ensemble for which Dan Jeffries, Nigel McBride and Nick DiBeradino have succeeded in persuading the Music Faculty to support. This is an “orchestra” without double basses, or horns, or Chinese gongs, or piccolos. In a visually restrained performance, you’ll see some of the Music Faculty’s composition students – and some others who are principally musicologists – behind glowing apple-screens, typing, dragging with the mouse, occasionally laughing at a hidden joke. From the audience perspective, electronic and rather ambient sounds will wash through the room, but it’s hard to tell who is doing what to create these sounds. As a member of this ensemble, I’ll provide a glimpse of what’s on our screens.
Laptop orchestras have become a growing phenomenon, especially within the context of university music; it’s a heavily funded project at the cutting edges of custom music technology and avant-garde academic composition. Not surprisingly, it’s technology-based, with the distinctive feature being pricey speakers specifically designed for this purpose – their six-faced design renders them capable of diffusing sound in many directions. The “orchestra” doesn’t actually play together at the moment but as three groups of six (we have only six speakers, since they are so expensive). One performer controls each speaker – hence the idea that it is played like an instrument, flexibly, and in real-time.
Throughout the performance, we’ll be sending each other messages, some of which are the cause of the laughter. Most of them will be concerned with matching our tempi or tone, but I won’t promise that our thoughts aren’t sometimes wandering. Pretty much anything could happen on the night, and the three sextets may develop distinct sounds as rehearsal practices diverge. As a medium, the laptop orchestra is so new that it could still take off in many possible directions, yet already not so new that it doesn’t already have recognised practices. In some ways, it’s really quite retro, just sitting round fiddling with grooves.
About this project I have been by turns enthusiastic and cynical, but I can honestly say that as rehearsal progresses, the sounds coming out of the speakers have become vastly more interesting each week. Do expect informality and weird sci-fi sounds, jumpy bass and sparkling high tones like an ill-advised night-time stroll in fairy-tale woods. Don’t expect a prompt start.