Monday 7th July 2025
Blog Page 1601

Oriel building works affect next year’s finalist rooms

0

Owing to “major refurbishment” on Oriel College’s Rhodes Building, on the High Street opposite the University Church, some current second-year undergraduates will have to live in James Mellon Hall off Cowley Road in 2013-14.

This has caused concern among the JCR, although Oriel College has maintained its guarantee of accommodation for all JCR members.

JCR President, Natasha Bassett, wrote in an email to the JCR, “There has been a few panicking persons [sic] coming to me about what’s happening next year in terms of accommodation. As you all probably know, the Rhodes Building is being renovated for the whole of next year.”

In the same email sent at the end of last term, Bassett explained “What may change is where people live; for example, some second years may get to live in JMH .”

The details of how the renovation works will affect students are still under discussion.

Wilf Stephenson, Treasurer of Oriel College, said, “Handling of the knock-on impact has been discussed and agreed by a joint working committee led by the Domestic Bursar and comprised of representatives from the JCR and MCR.”

Stephenson, whose office will be affected, explained, “The Rhodes Building needs major refurbishment. This will include providing additional accommodation, better facilities and disabled access.”

The roof will also be replaced and a 1980s upper-ground floor will be demolished.

The provision of accommodation for first- and second-year undergraduates will remain unchanged.

“Freshers will continue to live on the main college site. All second years should also be able to stay on the main college site. However choice (and grade) of rooms will be more limited than usual. There will be some displacement of third years. Some additional accommodation has been secured,” Stephenson continued.

Graduate students will be hardest hit. “It is possible fewer non-fresher graduates will be provided with college accommodation than in previous years,” Stephenson added.

The Rhodes Building was erected in 1911 through funds left by Cecil Rhodes, an alumnus of Oriel.

Oxford farming conference in Exam Schools

0

LAST WEEK the annual Oxford Farming Conference took place at the Examination Schools, with speakers including the Prince of Wales and the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Running from Wednesday to Friday, the conference focused on the impact of our consumerdriven society upon agriculture.

The conference attempted to examine what farming delivers to society in financial terms, drawing upon big names in cultivation, politics and the environment to debate the issue.

Oxford has hosted the event for more than half a century and it attracts many distinguished speakers. One of the keynote speakers was Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Owen Paterson.

The MP told conference goers that 22 per cent of the food currently imported by Britain could easily be grown at home. Paterson also urged his listeners to remember the Olympic spirit and back ‘Team GB’ in all areas, including the support of British produce.

Among the eminent speakers was Prince

Charles who gave a pre-recorded speech by video link. The Prince, a longstanding enviromental activist, echoed Paterson’s message by advising the public to take a greater interest in the origin of their foodstuffs.

“We all have to realise that food does not simply appear on our plates as a matter of course. As never before, it is a gift to be treasured, and therefore the people who produce this resource should be prized above all others and supported in ways that enable them to carry on doing what they do in as durable and resilient a way as possible,” he said.

The future of agriculture was a significant topic of both the Prince’s speech and the conference overall, with the programme featuring talks such as ‘Finding a New Farming Paradigm’ and ‘Where might science, technology and our understanding take us?’

In his speech Prince Charles warned, “For too long in the West, I am afraid, we have enjoyed something of a consumer’s holiday. Food above all else has been seen as a cheap commodity to which little value is attached.

“There will be no food security if the world goes on prevaricating and postponing the kind of global action needed to tackle accelerating climate change, unsustainable population growth without regard to finite natural resources, violent and unusual extremes of weather and the catastrophic likelihood of a global temperature rise of four degrees centigrade by later this century.”

“Failure to tackle this immense and urgent challenge will merely ensure a glut of headless chickens,” he added.

Speaking to Cherwell on behalf of the Oxford Farming Conference, the Managing Director of the event, Mike Gooding, said, “The conference delivered its research report that set out to better understand what society gets from its connection with farming”.

He described the week as “a unique opportunity for scholars to interact with a wide crosssection of indust“ry.”

Failure to tackle this immense and urgent challenge will merely ensure a glut of headless chickens

Despite the conference’s initial success, the event saw a number of farm workers striking outside Exam Schools on its final day.

The farmers, angered about changes to their wage structure, were protesting against the future prospects of a levelled down minimum wage of £6.19 for all agricultural workers. Steve Leniec, a farm worker from Faringdon and chairman of Unite’s agricultural sector claimed that “it will be a disaster for our workers and for the rural economy.” 

Council to limit student housing

0

Oxford Council has unveiled new plans that aim to control the spread of student housing in the city.

The council’s proposals, which have been approved by a government inspector, plan to restrict the development of new student accommodation to the city centre.

The plans aim for there to be no more than 3,000 students from Oxford Brookes University and the University of Oxford living outside of university-provided accommodation.

In her report, planning inspector Shelagh Bussey highlighted “the tension that exists between provision for student accommodation and general purpose housing”. She also spoke of the need “to strike a balance between these two uses that often compete for the same sites to ensure that housing, and particularly affordable housing delivery, is not compromised.”

She added, “This conflict is exacerbated by the growing trend for colleges not associated with the two universities to locate and expand in Oxford, building on the ‘Oxford’ name, for which speculative student accommodation is being provided. The intention is that this would free up homes that are suitable for the general housing market.”

The plans also acknowledge that purpose-built student accommodation must be away from residential areas to minimise disturbance. The council proposed that student accommodation should be mainly located in the city centre, or adjacent to a main thoroughfare, to relieve pressure on residential streets. Current plans are to impose a cap of 20% on the number of houses of multiple occupations (HMOs) allowed in any 100-metre stretch of residential road.

A spokesperson for Oxford City Council applauded the plans, adding, “Public consultation revealed a local concern that having halls located in quiet residential streets can mean that some anti-social behaviour affects other residents at night. The Council responded to this by directing halls away from quieter residential streets. Whilst there are some limits on the location of student halls, our assessment did not consider that this unduly restricted opportunities for student accommodation in appropriate locations in Oxford.”

A spokesperson for the University added, “The 3,000 figure is not new and the collegiate university is in the process of expanding its provision of housing for students by building new accommodation, in order to stay below this threshold and ease the burden on Oxford’s rental market. The Castle Mill student accommodation project is the latest example.”

Rio Jones, Co-Chair of the Oxford Unviersity Lib Dem Society, claimed, “This is not only going to affect students. By setting a cap like that you are also hitting young professionals working in the city who can’t afford a house of their own in a place where housing is already in short supply. This could have really harsh consequences for already struggling tenants.

“This cap is essentially saying, ‘we don’t want too many of your lot in this area’, when I don’t think that students and young people are necessarily the creators of ‘disturbance’. I really do think these proposals should be a cause for concern for students and young people throughout Oxford; and having your own circumstances sorted shouldn’t be an excuse to not care.”

Meat-free Mondays battle ongoing at Somerville

0

A JCR motion proposing ‘meat- free Mondays’ at Somerville College has caused split opinion amongst undergraduates.

The motion to provide only vegetarian choices in the Dining Hall on Mondays was put to the JCR at the end of Michaelmas term, and

initially passed with 27 students voting for the motion and 20 against. Two students abstained.

However, once the motion was passed, Somerville students who were unhappy about the result took to their college Facebook page, the ‘Somerville JCR noticeboard’. Marsha Sudar, Somerville JCR President, told Cherwell, “There was constant posting for a good three hours, and a group created against the motion. Nothing like this has happened at Somerville before. I’ve only been here two years, however I’ve been told by grad students who were at Somerville three or four years ago that there really never has been such a passionate response from the JCR to a JCR motion.”

One student, in opposition to the motion, wrote: “The funniest thing is, you’ve all ignored the fact that the college veggie options are uniformly awful…Why not vote for something everyone can get behind (and that there’s actually a chance that college will listen to you about) and petition them to make more palatable veggie meals?”

Another stated on the page, “I just can’t believe people complain about the motion passing, when they were too ‘busy’ for the 15 minutes that the motion lasted to attend, yet they somehow have the time to make hours of fuss over it straight after.”

A petition against the motion was handed to Sudar and a referendum on the issue was then called. One poster encouraging students to oppose the motion stated, “As adults, why are we being limited in what we can eat?” However, in response, Somerville student Richard Nias noted, “Hall not serving a certain type of meal does not stop you eating it. There are things called supermarkets and kitchens.”

Sudar further commented that, despite the heated discussion of the Facebook group, “Hustings went quite smoothly. It was exactly what the JCR executive had hoped for: an open discussion about various facets of the issue at hand. Around 50 people came, and many agreed afterwards that it was a very positive and worthwhile event.”

Somerville student Florence Avery agreed that it had been a positive experience. She commented, “I’m glad it passed and I think the discussion really got people thinking more about the impact of their food, which is great. Our JCR President, Marsha, handled everything brilliantly. It all happened really close to the end of term but she got straight on it and organised hustings and the referendum really efficiently.”

Other Oxford students were also receptive to the idea of ‘Meat Free Mondays’. Jamie Harris, founding member of Oxford Students for Animals, a group campaigning to increase vegetarian and vegan options throughout the University, commented, ‘Meat Free Mondays’ is a fantastic idea. With a bit of luck and lots of campaigning, hopefully the concept, or something similar, can be established more widely in public and private institutions throughout the country.”

Despite opposition, the motion still stood. With a turnout of 54 per cent, 119 people voted in favour of the motion, with 91 against. Nine people abstained. The Somerville JCR are now waiting for a response from the Somerville MCR before they approach the catering department.

‘Meat-free Mondays’ faced similar controversy at Wadham this time last year, as their SU voted to re- instate a meat option on Monday after a two-year involvement in the campaign. 

Interview: Bowling For Soup

0

This year, the punk/rock and roll band Bowling for Soup celebrate their 18th birthday. Old enough to drink, they have celebrated appropriately by completing their ‘One Big Happy’ tour of the UK and have, in their own words, ‘drunk enough vodka to qualify as Russian’.

It’s easy to get the impression from Bowling for Soup’s song writing style that they don’t take themselves too seriously. One listen to the song ‘Let’s Go to the Pub’ from their new album does nothing to dispel this feeling.

But five minutes into our interview, an entirely new idea comes across. Erik begins by trying to put his finger on the precise genre of their music and lists influences which cover country and western to death metal in one sentence. These are a bunch of friends that love almost all music and have a lot of fun creating the resulting blob for thousands of loyal fans. But they couldn’t be more serious about it.

In fact, he seems to dislike the idea that some might think it’s easy to do what they do – BFS spend more time touring and producing than many other bands of their genre. And when asked which of the two he prefers, Erik is quick to highlight how mentally and physically taxing both elements are. ‘Being in the studio is like taking tests all day long, but then being on the road is like you’re just constantly working out.’

But it’s all worth it for the feedback they get from the fans. And this is especially true of those in the UK – who Erik credits with the rescue of the band’s career in 2000. ‘We released this album that just did absolutely nothing [in the states]. We released ‘the Bitch Song’, and the video over here hit. Then all of a sudden, it was like “oh! There’s something happening!” For years and years our career was in the UK, and then the US just caught up with it… the UK music fans saved us and have given us the longevity of our career, because it happened here first!’

So, inspired by this deep thinking, we grilled him on solipsism. Erik’s response? ‘I’m quite certain that the only thing we can be sure exists is the self, but I also believe that you make the self what you want it to be, and then that projects and creates everything else around you. You create your own reality, and the more involved you are, the better it becomes. We pushed through and made a career out of something we love.’

So, seeing as he seemed to have the idea of the self covered, was he the same person he was when he started this interview? He ponders it. ‘Yes. Absolutely. We are very much about being real and what you see is what you get. I’m just me, I’m a big nerd, and you’ll never get anything other than that… What was the question again? Yeah. So in answer to your question: A2 + B2 = C2. That’s Pythagorean theory by the way!’

We left with a very different impression of BFS to when we stepped on their tour bus. They are masters of the art of balancing the playfulness of their music with the seriousness with which they take it. They’ve made it to the top not by luck, but through 18 years of clawing their way there. And now they can pay their rent doing what started as a bunch of friends playing to themselves.  They’ve done it. And we like to think that’s a little bit because of us Brits.

The Miserables

0

The release of Les Miserables (the film) has been eagerly anticipated by many adoring fans. After a record 27 years of the stage show, a rather impressive production team and cast have been assembled to transfer it to the big screen. However, for those who ‘hate musicals’ this is rather less appealing. The idea of Wolverine spontaneously breaking into an over-dramatic song is nauseating. Perhaps going to see The Hobbit for a third time would be better?

When people hear the word ‘musical’ it can conjure up various distasteful images (and sounds). Faced with memories of Glee Club members with cheesy grins painted on their faces, or the squeals of countless girls attempting (and failing) to sing ‘Defying Gravity’, understandably some are put off. Even despite these extreme stereotypes, on the face of it there is still something very fake about musical theatre. A spectacle – yes – some nice music – of course – but ultimately unrealistic. It seems utterly ridiculous that during normal dialogue a character should suddenly start singing. 

Certainly, many musicals have ridiculous story-lines, with feel-good hits which tend to add little or nothing to the plot or characters. For many years show tunes from different musicals have been enjoyed by entire generations of people and, similarly nowadays, light-hearted productions such as The Producers and Wicked have been incredibly popular. These musicals have their place, reaching their goal in entertaining the audience and providing the perfect form of escapism. Often musically and visually impressive, many of these shows include timeless classics which are widely adored, and rightly so.

But musical theatre can be far more than the jolly song and dance that it is so often seen to be. So much more can and has been achieved. For a start, just like in plays and films, most musicals include characters which are believable and with whom we can relate on a level which is not superficial. Take Les Miserables, for instance, in which Eponine’s unrequited love for Marius is something with which everyone can identify.

In order to bring across these very real, human emotions, music and lyrics can be the most powerful means. This is almost paradoxical; something so real being portrayed in such an unnatural way. In theatre and cinema, speech is usually completely realist, and with that comes huge benefits. Above all, the feelings which it portrays are incredibly direct. But music also has various ways to unlock these feelings, like a state of excitement, a sinister undertone or – most commonly – the realisation of love. Speech has power through both its meaning and the sounds made in its iteration, and this can be utilized very effectively in a song. With lyrics which complement the music, and vice versa, actors have the potential to explore their characters in a profound way.

What is most intriguing about Les Miserables is the way in which the actors performed their songs live on set in order to make them as real as possible; the music is not separated from the characters or their feelings. This leaves them open to criticism from both those demanding more polished vocal performances, and those who dislike the idea of seemingly realistic characters breaking into song. Though judgement must be reserved until having watched the film, their attempt to bring the characters to the audience in such an intimate – and genuine – way is to be applauded.

A musical, done well, has the ability to combine compelling music with convincing characters. And that should not be too hastily dismissed. 

Made in Chelsea: Series 4

0

As usual, a new series in Chelsea brings a glitzy array of new characters to fuel SW3’s beloved bitching: however this time, it was more of a barrage.  From Andy and his nostrils to up-in-my-grill Lucy, the producers left no room for peace. But series 4 didn’t really expand, it just sank to even greater depths than we could have possibly imagined: from the ‘erotic’, a 50 Shades of Vom shower-scene with Spenny-Weez, to the violent, thanks to Millie Smackintosh, but more crucially to the clunkingly inauthentic, less endearingly set-up than badly-acted poorly-scripted sub-soap.

So, was the series finale a slap to the face? Louise cried multiple times (totally out-of-character) and there were also a lot of very awkward prolonged shots, in which members of the Chelsea gang look awkwardly at each other. Having said this, I’m still not quite sure about what happened to Gabriella. After whinnying something about leaving London, she gets into a black cab looking awfully downcast.  But somehow, in a way which doesn’t induce any sympathy. Maybe she was escaping the hordes of Twitter h8rz that still haven’t forgiven her for that horrific rainbow dip-dye in season 3. But basically, as Twitter-user @connorandrws succinctly concludes, ‘watching the Gabriella and Ollie taxi scene makes [us] want to castrate [ourselves].’  

But what about series 4 as a whole? What have we learnt?  Sadly, if anything, that this ‘structured reality’ perhaps isn’t as real as it is publicised to be: a classic example of MIC falling into the category of ‘scripted’ rather than ‘spontaneous’ is of course, the Spencer-Louise thing. None of us are going to conveniently forget about Channel 5’s The Bachelor. We pretend to, because watching a weekly MIC bitch-fest is our guilty pleasure, and we wouldn’t want to ruin that. But still we knew something was up. The predictability of the finale just sums up the progression of the genre: reality is spontaneous. Made in Chelsea is not. The rare occasions when reality interrupts this structured glitz – for example, that mundane setback when Herbie was taken away to a foster home– serve as glimmers of hope. But sadly, there aren’t too many. 

Lastly, if you were upset you missed the End Of Year Party on NYE because you were getting drunk, don’t worry. It was excruciating. And if you think the broadcasted episodes of MIC are awkward, this was just on another level. Even Binky’s ‘TOTES AMAZE’ t-shirt didn’t alleviate the pain.

So yes, the series 4 finale wasn’t as shocking as it was trying to be, and apart from Francis and his teddy-bear, I won’t be missing anyone. And for now, we can say ‘but whatever’. I guess we watch MIC for the bitching, not its insights on people and reality.  But when you think of MIC’s counterparts, the critically acclaimed Desperate Scousewives, or even TOWIE, I don’t know how many more series of MIC we’ll be able to bear before the ‘structured reality’ of SW3 starts getting up in our grill… or disappears entirely. Something tells me it won’t be too long.

Oxford researchers locate high-risk genes for bowel cancer

0

Oxford University researchers have located two genetic faults which increase the risk of individuals with a history of bowel cancer in the family developing it themselves.

The research was carried out by the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics in Oxford and Cancer Research UK, and established a high correlation between bowel cancer development and mutations in two specific genes, POLE and POLD1, which are involved in the DNA repairing processes.

The research found that defects in these genes can cause an accumulation of DNA damage in the body that may contribute to bowel cancer.

The Cancer Research UK-funded project selected twenty people as study subjects, eight of which had previously been diagnosed with bowel cancer whilst the rest had a first-degree relative who developed the illness. After sequencing the genomes of the 20 participants, the scientists found both of the faulty genes in all subjects with bowel cancer or malignant tumours in the bowel.

To further consolidate the result, the research team broadened their inspection base to 4000 people with bowel cancer and a control group of 6700 without the disease. Not a single case of genetic deficiencies in POLE or POLD1 was found in the control group, while the researchers found 12 people with POLE fault and one person with POLD1 fault in the bowel cancer group.

However, Oxford Professor Ian Tomlinson who led the study pointed out: “There are some families where large numbers of relatives develop bowel cancer but who don’t have any of the known gene faults that raise the risk of developing the disease.”

Professor Richard Houlston from The Institute of Cancer Research, a co-leader of the research commented, “Uncovering gene faults like these two is extremely important, as inherited susceptibility plays a role in the development of about a third of all cases of colorectal cancer. This is one of the most important discoveries in bowel cancer genetics in years.”

“It should allow us to manage families affected by inherited bowel cancer much more effectively, and it offers new clues for the prevention or treatment of all forms of the disease,” he added.

According to NHS, bowel cancer, or more formally known as colorectal cancer (CRC), is the second most common type of cancer among women in the UK, second after breast cancer. It is the third most common cancer among men behind prostate and lung cancer.

Currently under NHS, everyone between the ages of 60 and 69 is offered bowel cancer screening every two years.  Almost three quarters of the people affected are over 65.

Like many other cancers, early diagnosis is crucial in the treatment of bowel cancer. The survival rate five years after detection of the cancer is about 90% if found in early stages, compared to the 6% in the most advanced stage. The average chance of surviving five years after diagnosis of bowel cancer is approximately 50%.

University church’s restoration completed

0

The University Church of St Mary the Virgin saw its extensive restoration project completed in time for Christmas, with a mainly positive reaction from students and the congregation.

The conservation work to the church building, parts of which date back to the 13th century, concentrated on the maintenance of both exterior and interior stone, woodwork and windows and a newly painted celure was added to the ceiling.

Particular care was taken over the conservation of the Old Library, which was built in 1320. Considered the first non-college building of the university it provided a physical centre point for the construction of other university buildings. New disabled access has also been installed.

The preservation of the historic church site, which housed the trial of the 16th century Oxford Martyrs, was funded by a £3.4 million grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund. The money was given on the condition that particular focus will be placed on educational schemes telling the heritage story of the University’s link with the Church.

Project managers worked to keep the church and its famous 13th century tower, a popular tourist attraction, open to both the congregation and the 300,000 tourists who visit throughout the year.

The Revd Canon Brian Mountford commented, “Although there still remain a few loose ends to tie up, the Church is substantially complete and was ready in time for the Christmas celebrations.”

He went on to stress the importance of the church to the daily life of the university, explaining, “While the Church is foremost a place of worship attended by a cross-section of age groups, it remains an important concert venue, is used by the Saïd Business School for degree ceremonies, and holds the Bampton Divinity lectures. Most of the congregation is University connected, and there are quite a lot of undergraduate and graduate attendees.”

The project encountered no major problems, despite fears that a heating failure on Christmas Eve would threaten services on Christmas Day. However, this was fixed at the last minute by an emergency engineer.

The congregation are said to be extremely pleased with the improvements, with many commenting on the beauty of the refurbished Church. Altogether, almost 800 people attended the Crib Service, Midnight Mass, and Christmas Day Services.

David Bagg, a third year Classics student from Balliol recognised the important of the recent preservation work. He said, “It’s brilliant that the University and Oxford Thinking Campaign benefactors have worked so hard to protect the University’s Christian heritage. The University Church (where OXFAM was founded in 1942) is now in a great place to amplify that heritage by serving the hungry, homeless and hopeless.”

If You Liked… Album by Girls

0

Album by Girls is not exactly a one-of-a-kind album. Plenty of bands have had the same world-weary attitude, the same skill with harmonies, the same knack for tragic lyricism and the same ability to bring the whole lot together into  a world-beating song. Very few, however, existed in the late ‘00s. Girls revived and revamped the classic sixties record, not as teeny-bopping Beatles-wannabes or psych rock rejects, but as lush instrumental pop musicians, much as The Beach Boys were at their creative (rather than commercial) peak. Their main musical powerhouse was their frontman, Christopher Owens, a man with a tragic past involving cults, drugs, family issues, and yet more drugs. Each and every song they produced was fantastic, strung-out, sway-along stuff. It’s a shame they split up in 2012.

However, if you liked Girls, then you’ll love Mac DeMarco! Although Mac DeMarco are far less ostentatious in their orchestration (try saying that after a couple of drinks!), the same spirit lives on in their work. Tales of love, desperation and all sorts of misfits are conveyed in an uplifting and intriguing manner. The minute that you really begin to see the similarity is during “Ode to Viceroy” from 2012’s sophomore effort, 2, as Mac drawls the name of the recipient of the song over lush, expansive guitars. There could not be a more perfect inheritor of the crown of slacker-pop.

Girls may be gone, but Mac lives on!