Thursday, April 24, 2025
Blog Page 1637

Going Down on Grey

0

There’s nothing I like more than reading a book which doesn’t feature on my prescribed reading list. And after weeks of furious cramming I’ve had enough of Beowulf, Shakespeare, and I hate to say it, even George (Eliot and Orwell). This summer, I thought, was the time to see what the nation is reading and to dabble in some popular literature.

Naturally, the best place to start would be with the book impressively dubbed fastest selling paperback of all time: E.L James’ Fifty Shades of Grey (if you haven’t already heard of it, you’re taking the Oxford bubble too seriously). It’s the baby of the digital download revolution, the raunchy result of a public too modest to show off their erotic library on the tube. Because let’s face it, revealing you know the correct knot required to tie someone up could be seen as socially daunting. But even then, if you happen to own a tangible copy, the cover art is deliciously elusive. Taking a glance at the cover, you’d have no idea that the silver-patterned tie illustrates a volume containing the phrase: “Come, I want to show you my playroom.”  Walking into Waterstones, I carelessly picked up the bestseller prepared for its erotic content. What I wasn’t prepared for was my subsequent lack of faith in Britain’s literate population.

Ok, so that last comment probably sounds a bit harsh. But I did encounter Fifty Shades with an open mind, I really did. I just find it incredible that a book which is written with mediocre skill (at best), has trumped any and every Orange prize winner with its ‘oh my’s and casual references to riding crops. Reading Fifty Shades it’s easy to see its origins as a Twilight Fanfiction as James makes the parallels between characters easy to identify. Readers have their beloved Bella in the guise of technologically challenged Anastasia Steele (at 22 she has yet to discover email), and the vampire in the guise of vampish but still very much alive, Christian Grey. However, my disappointment with this piece of literature (the term is used loosely), is not in its blatant parallels to Twilight, but more so in the fact that nothing really happens. At all. Ever. Christian Grey, “dominant” and perhaps the biggest control freak in fiction, desires Anastasia Steele to be “submissive”. She complies then decides that, actually no, she’d rather not. Spoiler alert – oh wait – that was the whole plot.

So, why is the world reading this book? Possibly not for its comedic value, which admittedly was my incentive following the phrase: “He’s my very own Christian Grey flavour Popsicle”. What some readers may class as erotic, I found to be delightfully humorous.  But perhaps this is due to my robotic English student analysis, which picked up an array of amusing literary features. For example, we have the motif of the “foil packet” which makes a continued appearance, Grey apparently possessing at least twelve condoms on his person at any given time, just in case. We have repetition of the phrase “my inner goddess” every other line, and a great deal of “lip biting” which appears in juxtaposition to Grey’s growing erection. James also includes many an intersexual, sorry, intertextual reference to Tess of the D’Urbervilles, Anastasia likening both herself and her relationship to Hardy’s classic. But perhaps most worryingly of all is the voice of our heroine. I could almost overlook the fact she orgasms multiple times (on demand) if it wasn’t for the regrettable truth that she sounds like a juvenile. Ana constantly refers to “down there” and is prone to the occasional outburst of “holy hell!” or “holy Moses” when something particularly shocking occurs. Usually when Grey gets naked.

Fifty Shades of Grey is as far as I could get from Beowulf without resorting to actual porn, and in that sense it certainly achieved its purpose. And I must confess, I did actually enjoy the book, and read aloud it made for glorious entertainment at a £4.09 steal. It may not be great literature, or deserving a 17 week reign in the charts, but it’s worth knowing what all the fuss is about. Even if you’re not completely whipped. 

2 STARS

Is Oxford selling out?

0

Tom Beardsworth: Why it’s time to get big-money out of university education.

Cherwell reported last week on the extent to which Oxford continues to rely on large donations from wealthy individuals. There is no doubt that universities rely on philanthropy; this will become ever more the case as central government slashes higher education budgets. As students we benefit from the facilities and teaching that donations allow. The Said Business School, founded with £23 million seed money from Wafic Said, and the Blavatnik School of Government, which with a £75 million gift from the Russian billionaire, will take its inaugural class this year, both enhance the educational opportunities that Oxford offers in competition with other global leaders.

Why then would we wish to restrict big-money donations? Most donors have been well-regarded philanthropists but others, it must be said, have made their money in a less-than-scrupulous fashion. Said made his fortune courtesy of the Saudi Royal family, and achieved notoriety for the Al Yamamah defence contract between BAE and the Saudi Air Force which later led to charges of corruption in a US court. Another benefactor of the school, the Italian industrial giant ENI, has fallen victim to charges of institutional bribery. The dirty money trail has brought the university into disrepute, feeding the perception that Oxford’s dreaming spires are the playthings of oligarchs and klepotocrats.

Why does it matter where the money comes from, as long as it goes to good use? Well we have to recognise that other factors should be considered alongside, and occasionally trump, the amount of money that is being given. Most importantly the University should think about its integrity, which it too often neglects. Philanthropy to renowned educational institutions like Oxford is a classic way for businessmen to legitimise their wealth if its source would otherwise be condemned. If the University takes money from an arms deal then it, and by extension we, wholeheartedly endorse the practice. It’s the same argument that Exeter College provoked earlier this year, when it profited from Christian Concern, a bigoted anti-gay group, using college accommodation over the vacation. The income would have benefitted students, but ultimately they did not want to pay the price of association entailed by accepting the money. The college latterly donated the money to charity. Aren’t the University’s vetting procedures sufficient to filter out dodgy donors and keep the well-intentioned ones? I’d argue that they aren’t, as the Said case shows. When big-money is offered, dollar signs inevitably float about the administrators’ heads, prejudicing the Board’s decision. But the case for a cap is more fundamental. It’s about the character of the institutions we participate in.

Where will it end? If the ‘British Petroleum Oxford Ecological Institute’ and the ‘Roman Abromovich Centre for Management’ taste bitter to you, then it’s because what we value about quality education – its intrinsic merits – are debased by the rotten foundations which underpin them. In the long-term Oxford will be fine, with good facilities and dynamic teaching. What is in danger is our reputation, which can rapidly evaporate. The University is fortunate in its wealth of successful alumni. We should therefore aim for a plurality of small to medium sized donations, allowing us to cap the big ones. Small is beautiful. Let’s make it that way.

Isabelle Westbury: Capping donations is severing a much needed lifeline for our universities

On discussing the topic of wealthy donations to educational institutions, the most immediate concerns that may spring to mind are the occasional less-than-legitimate methods by which some donors acquire their vast fortunes – a topic the popular media love to publicise. However, the most immediate issue here is not the source of these donations, through unscrupulous means or otherwise, but more the amount and whether this should have a limit imposed upon it.

Of course, on receiving donations, the source, reputation and background of that donor should always be taken into account. It will always be a fine line which divides the necessity for donated funds and the morality of the donor contributing said funds. Don’t be misled in believing that this is a matter taken lightly, however. Notwithstanding any unwanted temporary negative publicity, it is firmly in the interest of any university to judge wisely on the donations they receive; not only are the finances at stake, but the reputation and morality of said university also come under scrutiny and can leave a lasting mark – much more damaging than any one-off cash boost. Oxford University has a policy in place whereby they will only “…consider gifts from that donor if the behaviour which led to the donor’s reputation being tarnished has clearly ceased.” Oxford also has many more specific guidelines in place; donations from those “actively working in the tobacco industry”, for example, are not accepted. Few donations towards institutions the world over will be found without their controversies; we must trust that it is in the interests of the university that they have both the integrity and common sense to make the sensible decision.

Back to the real issue, however – the cap. Cuts to higher education dominated last year’s press, with swathes of students protesting against the rise in university fees. Less attention, however, was paid to the reason behind these rises – that universities simply haven’t got the funds to sustain the vital service that they provide. The government’s proposal to curb tax breaks on charitable donations – which encompasses universities – is one of grave concern. The Vice-Chancellors of both Oxford and Cambridge have already written private letters to George Osborne urging him to reconsider his decision, highlighting the extent to which universities rely on large financial donations. The fact that the issue is being handled this far up the ladder at the two leading universities in the UK is a reflection of the gravity of this issue. Of course, the government’s proposals are there for a reason – charitable giving is an effective form of tax avoidance for the wealthy – another issue popular in the current media with the likes of Jimmy Carr’s tax arrangements recently in the spotlight – but it doesn’t mean that this is the right way to go. In the long term, sufficient university funding and development is what will matter to the UK – without it, economic growth will stagnate, and for what reason? For a few rotten-but-incredibly-rich scoundrels to stop avoiding tax by donating to charity, only to use their personally hired accountants to exploit another tax loophole? If it’s not through charitable gifts, there will be new ways found – mark my word.

The culture of university philanthropy and the simple fact that universities now rely on charitable donations far outweighs the need to stop tax avoidance through this one avenue. If it were a trade-off between the two, I know which choice I’d make.

Oxford research predicts most expensive Olympics ever

0

Oxford researchers have indicated that the London Olympic Games are set to be the most expensive of all time, with the current projected cost standing at £8.4 billion.

The working paper carried out by researchers from Oxford’s Saïd Business School also found that the budget overrun of London 2012, currently predicted to be 101%, is ‘significantly more’ than the average for the past decade.

Although the average overrun for 1968-2000 stood at 258%, the Games in the last 10 years have seen this average reduced to 47%.

When asked why London 2012’s expenditure is greater than other recent Olympics, researcher Allison Stewart expressed uncertainty, telling Cherwell, “With the data we have, we don’t have enough to speculate on why London 2012 is experiencing significantly higher cost overruns than Games of the last decade. By all accounts, London has been very well managed.

“However, they increased their budget to almost the current expected cost only two years after winning the Games, which suggests that the bid budget was simply unrealistic and unachievable.”

Despite this, lead researcher Professor Bent Flyvbjerg stressed that the difficulties in budgeting Olympics were shared by all host nations, commenting, “Unlike other major programmes such as bridges, airports, IT or engineering works, the Games are always a unique undertaking to that city. Of the thousands of people engaged to work on the programme, few of them will ever have been on a Games committee in the past.

“This means that they are highly reliant on the information from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the other host cities around the world. Whilst a significant amount of information is transferred, there is inevitably a gap in experience that means that the Games are always starting from scratch in certain areas.”

Researchers are confident, however, that the overrun will not significantly affect the quality of the Games, with Stewart commenting, “By all accounts, the London Games are on schedule, and given the early acknowledgement of the budget overrun, we do not believe that it is likely to affect the execution of the Games.”

She is also confident that the Games will not have a significant long-term impact on the economy, saying, “Fortunately, Britain has a large economy, so is relatively well placed to absorb this overrun. However, it will be important to recoup the planned legacy for the Games, for example in securing a tenant for the Olympic Stadium, to ensure that the costs do not increase through ongoing maintenance fees.”

The research is the first to document, in a consistent fashion, the costs and cost overruns for the Olympic Games from 1960 to 2012. The findings are based on a quantitative analysis of budget data from every summer and winter Olympic Games from 1960 to 2012.

Oxford unveils plaque for cricket star

0

A plaque was unveiled at the Oxford University Pavilion in University Parks on Friday to celebrate the life and career of the Oxford and Indian cricketing legend Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi.

Mr Pataudi, known as the ‘Tiger Pataudi’, studied French and Arabic at Balliol College. Having captained Oxford and famously having scored centuries in each of the three Varsity matches he played in, he then went on to captain the Indian national side between 1961 and 1974.

His international career was nearly ended before it had even begun when he lost an eye in a car crash in 1961. Recovery saw him back in the nets learning to play with partial sight and he was able to lead Indian cricket for over a decade. The plaque was to celebrate the life and career of the ‘Tiger Pataudi’ who passed away last September at the age of 70.

Members of the Pataudi family in attendance were his widow Sharmila Tagore, eldest son Saif Ali Khan, a famous Bollywood actor, and his fiance Kareena Kapoor, daughters Saba Ali Khan and Soha Ali Khan and her partner Kunal Khemu. The family was welcomed by University Chancellor Lord Patten and Vice-Chancellor Professor Andrew Hamilton.

The University head of (Sport) Development Andrew Thomas said, “We were delighted to welcome such a prominent family from India with deep connections to Oxford and to share in the opportunity to honour Tiger Pataudi, one of our sporting legends.” 

The family of the Mr Pataudi had lunch at his former college Balliol and then went on to the Ashmolean, exploring the Indian collection. They finished their visit by watching the 160th match of the Harlequins, a club for Oxford cricketing alumni. 

Mr Thomas also commented, “The Pataudi family enjoyed the opportunity to walk around Oxford in relative anonymity, although at one stage a passing car came to an abrupt halt and a group of surprised and excited autograph hunters jumped out!”

Oxford extends support to all UK students

0

Students will pay a minimum of £3,500 tuition fees in their first year, and £6,000 a year after that. Fee payments increase for those with household income above £16,000, with those earning over £25,000 paying the full £9,000 tuition fee.

Bursaries also range between £500 to £4,300 a year depending on household income and with extra funding in the first year of a degree. This adds up to a maximum of £22,400 financial support from Oxford during a three-year undergraduate degree.

However, maintenance funding for Scottish and Northern Irish students is still less than for the rest of the UK as it is distributed by local government. Whereas all UK students are eligible for tuition fee waivers and loans, maintenance grants and maintenance loans depend on the local student loan authority.

Most English students can claim a £5,500 maintenance loan annually, with an additional maintenance grant of up to £3,250 available, which is based on household income. Scottish and Irish maintenance grants and loans are income-based and are less generous than English support.

Oxford accepted 93 undergraduate students from Scotland and Northern Ireland in 2011, when 451 students applied.

An Oxford University spokeswoman, responding to allegations that Scottish students were getting unfairly generous financial support, said “Oxford will offer the most generous financial support in the country for low-income students from the UK from October 2012.’

‘This financial support is provided from Oxford’s own resources – not government money. Oxford’s financial support is automatic and based on income – the number of bursaries available is unlimited.’

‘So a Scottish student getting the package will categorically not take funding away from an English student. The same financial support package is available to all UK students (suggestions that we are running a separate inducement exclusively to Scottish students are completely incorrect).’

‘Oxford is committed to access and our message to all UK students is, ‘If you have the ability to study at Oxford, we’ll ensure money is no barrier.’ ”

Robert Kelly, a Scottish student from Lincoln, commented, “I think it’s a good thing as the numbers of Scottish students at Oxford are already very low, and Scottish students are facing the prospect of £27,000 of debt when you can get as good an education for free at some Scottish universities like St Andrews.

‘By offering this, Oxford should be able to encourage more students from poorer backgrounds to come as well.’

‘It is also a sign that they want more Scottish students as they clearly acknowledge that they are more intelligent.”

Nozstock calling

Could your band be the next Coldplay? Reckon you could put the Ox in Fleet Foxes? The Rad (-Cam) in Radiohead? If so, boutique Herefordshire festival Nozstock is launching a competition, PlayNoz, which will be music to your band’s collective ears.

The Nozstock team is offering a student band or artist the chance to play a slot at the festival which sees The Futureheads and The Proclaimers headline from 27th-29th July. It may not quite be Glasto, but based around a ramshackle Tudor farmhouse and converted cowsheds in the Herefordshire Hidden Valley, Nozstock is at the forefront of the kooky, home-spun tribe of festivals proudly scorning any corporate ethos and aiming to stay rooted to its ad hoc origins as a family and friends based affair. Now in its 14th year, it has previously seen acts as diverse as the Buzzcocks, the Joy Formidable, Sub Focus and Pulled Apart by Horses.

To be with a chance of winning, entrants must submit their best track (covers are not allowed) via the Nozstock SoundCloud DropBox by midnight 1st July 2012. Voting will be open midday Friday 6th July until midnight Sunday 15th July by way of Soundcloud ‘favourites’ and ‘likes’ (so basically beg, bribe or otherwise coerce your friends into voting). The Nozstock team will pick one of the most liked tracks from among the Soundcloud submissions to perform at the festival.

On a wider level, in a polarised music industry which has seen cuts in subsidies to independent music labels occur alongside the omnipresent spectacle of the X Factor, it seems low-level festival participation schemes such as this present a useful opportunity for struggling and unsigned bands to break through into the festival circuit. So if you fancy joining the scores of bands who hit the big time after forming in their university days (R.E.M, Coldplay, MGMT amongst other musical heavyweights) PlayNoz could well signify your lucky break. And if all else, it would probably beat the average lacklustre college JCR open-mic night…

More details on how to enter can be found on the competition entry page here http://bit.ly/McqjZ5.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG4010%%[/mm-hide-text]

Review: Close the Coalhouse Door

0

You can’t help but feel nostalgic while watching Close the Coalhouse Door. And it’s a nostalgia, I must admit, that I didn’t anticipate I’d feel when taking my seat in the Playhouse. It stems from the contrast between the then and now, and in particular, between the thriving mining community of back then and its disintegration into the nothingness of today.

The contrast between different strands of time is effectively realised in the very first scene, a scene which features an abandoned terrace and a glamorized billboard. It’s hard to ignore the penetrating gaze of Meryl Streep in her guise as the Iron Lady; the advertisement juts out incongrous to the dark, smoky red-brick terrace lying behind it. But this cardboard cut-out is the only reference we are offered as to Thatcher’s collision with the pitmen, which is a shame.

Streeps’s advertisement is just one of Lee Hall’s revisions, made in attempt to bring Plater’s 1968 show ‘up to date for its modern audience’. And although Hall includes many contemporary gags and witticisms, we are left with an overall feeling of incompleteness. The problem with this play isn’t in the acting, or in West’s directing, but lies in the vast historical gulf between the play’s publication and the events of today. No amount of impressive multi-roling or catchy folk anthems can detract from the absence of Thatcher. It’s an absence deafening in a play concerned with the history of mining, and is an absence which acutely dates the piece, despite Hall’s best efforts.

Nevertheless, there is something in the accelerated ride through mining history, set amongst a family gathering, which makes for satisfying, thought-provoking viewing. We are hurtled through time in a montage featuring the ghosts of mining past: from 1834 and the forced labour of six year olds, to the growing discontent of the mining union, to the between wars chaos- all pinned into place by the then ‘present day’ of 1968.

The Brechtian vein allows for a history lesson, satire, drama and musical to be fused together and cumulates into a piece of consistently entertaining theatre. Designer Soutra Gilmour’s revolving set cleverly allows for the duality of strained domestic drama and industrial stories to occur simultaneously, the strong cast in their element as they dynamically leap from one scene to the next. Jane Holman, the matriarch of the household, especially stands out by her comic timing and pompous performance as Lord Londonderry. The cast expertly weaves Alex Glasgow’s haunting folk songs into the drama, underscoring the loss of both the mining industry, and its corresponding community, a community of parlour music, tradition and strength.

After eighteen years since its first major revival, Lee’s punchy new material came at a good time, but I would have liked more of it. Bringing Close the Coalhouse Door up to date for a 21st century audience is a laborious task for any well-intentioned revivalist, especially since the mining industry wasn’t deemed as dying in the 60s so much as losing popularity. Despite the incongruity, generated from overlooked events, this production is a quality piece of theatre which celebrates the mining legacy. 

FOUR STARS

The sun always Riesers

0

In an age where there are about as many internet DJs as there are remixes of Avicii’s ‘Levels’, it is always refreshing to witness a breakthrough DJ who seems to have found an original voice. Up and coming Austrian producer Tobias Rieser, producing under the name Klangkarussell, has generated a wave of popularity after his song ‘Sonnentanz’ went viral, being dubbed by many as the song of the summer.

The career of Rieser, who has been producing music since the age of 15, is in such an early stage that there is not yet a full EP released – only a couple of mixes on his Soundcloud page, one of which includes ‘Sonnentanz’ (‘Sun Dance’). Despite the reaction to the song being so widespread, with well over one and a half million views across different websites, Rieser told Cherwell that he ‘did not expect any reactions to the song at all.’

Having grown up in Salzburg, the home of Mozart, classical music has given a “wonderful influence” on the music of Rieser, who was born into a musical family, playing the trombone from an early age and learning from his father, a music teacher.

Klangkarussell’s music has been described by some as ‘deep house’, and by himself as ‘jazz house’ – but he says that “over the last few years it has become really difficult to talk about electronic music in terms of genres.

“There are some tracks you can easily connect to a genre, but I am proud of the fact that I would not try to assign my tracks to a special genre”. Although stating that his influences range from producers such as Marek Hemmann and Oliver Koletzki, to soul legends such as Otis Redding and James Brown, Rieser has stressed the need to have a diverse range of influences.

“You have to walk through the world with open eyes and ears and soak up everything and process it afterwards. There are beautiful tunes in every genre, you just need to listen carefully and sometimes hear music in the right context.”

How would Rieser recommend young DJs to manage to find an original, unique voice? “Just do what you want to do” he replies; “don’t think you need to follow any trends. Try to be an individual, and listen to your inner voice”.

Rieser was best friends in school with fellow Austrian producer Herald and I and who now, eight years on, is producing with Rieser under the name Helden:klang. “We are planning to release our first EP with ‘Sonnentanz’ and ‘Netzwerk’ [one of many popular Helden:klang collaborations] but we are not there yet”.

Dubbed as the next Paul Kalkbrenner, big things are expected of the man behind Klangkarussell.

The Enemy, Streets in the Sky review

0

The Enemy have, with Streets in the Sky, delivered the best album of the recession so far. Although it’s hardly a surprise that The Enemy have continued to explore their favourite themes of urban depression and the difficulties of modern living, what is surprising is that they seem to be doing it almost on their own. Streets in the Sky is, therefore, a precious thing.

To compare Tom Clarke to Bruce Springsteen might at first seem a little odd, but there’s a real comparison to be made. Both write about struggling young men and women with startling emotional involvement, and with a deeply hopeful and romantic sensibility. The Enemy’s unashamedly British sound falsifies any further comparison, but Clarke’s faculty for empathy is unusual, and is worth taking entirely seriously.

It’s become unfashionable to write songs about reality, but The Enemy do it self-consciously, and they do it well. ‘2 Kids’ documents a depressingly common realisation that big dreams might have disappeared. ‘This Is Real’’s protagonist is poor, lonely, and struggling. But in both cases, there’s some hope. Tom Clarke’s characters haven’t quite given up yet, and they’re implored not to. ‘Love we don’t have much/But what we have’s enough/Just hold your head up/And we’ll be ok’. ‘Modern Life is Rubbish’, in some ways, but, as another football-terrace chorus notes, ‘Saturday will make it all ok’. Clarke’s characters always have something, and often someone, dragging them through. Streets in the Sky is an album, in many ways, about love.

Although, for those in The Enemy’s songs, and for those they’re written for, the build up of pressures entailed by urban life is near unbearable, there’s always hope to be found in human relationships: things are never as bad as they might be, and at the weekend they’re a hell of a lot better.

Oxford’s still got it

0

Oxford. Infamous home of punting, Pimm’s, and pretentiousness. And it’s a home we’ve all come to know and love. Thousands of applicants voluntarily undertake the almost week-long agony of interviews, tests and talking to everyone under the sun, and it’s not just because they get a free (all-inclusive) holiday in the process.

The place has appeal – and it’s certainly not its position in the ‘University sex league table’ (51, to save you having to Google it). Well, we can’t tick all the boxes. But It did turn twenty-six ordinary scholars into Prime Ministers. It turned Rowan Atkinson into Mr Bean. It gave Harry Potter a home. What more could you want?

Of course, being a member of one of the oldest universities in the world means that we are able to grab every opportunity we can to drop it into a conversation that is undoubtedly not at all related. Although this inevitably results in an awkward silence, a nervous giggle and a glare of malicious hatred, we carry on. Let’s face it; having someone on the other side of the world fall at your feet because you mention the O-word (and I’m talking Oxford) is worth a scowl or two.

If that wasn’t enough, we’ve got a whole load of ridiculous traditions that we happily embrace and that allow us to pretend we’re something of a different species from the rest of the world. Anyone wanting to imagine they’re a) in the 1600s, b) in a novel or c) just (obviously) very cool, can quite easily do so as they slip on their sub-fusc and settle down for a formal in hall, the likes of which can only be found in fairy-tales, cartoons and… well, Cambridge. It might be a far cry from real life but we can wrap ourselves in a little Oxford bubble and happily bob along until the fateful day of graduation where we’re inevitably going to be forced out of our comfort zone and into the Big Wide World.

Until then, we can carry on basking in the bottomless pit of oddities particular to Oxford.Take sconcing; nowhere else will you find anyone that uses a word dating back to 1617 to tell twenty other people who your friend slept with last night, and nowhere else will you find that happening on a “crew date”. Say either of those words to anyone that doesn’t go to Oxford and you’ll find yourself babbling on for a good couple of hours trying to make it sound good (or at least relatively normal), miserably failing, and realising that you really are at a very strange institution indeed. But that’s hardly going to stop us.

Add to that all the other made-up words we find ourselves using (pidge, tute, rustication, matriculation, and probably a whole host of other equally dodgy-sounding words), and you could pretty much fill up an Oxford English Dictionary (ironic). You can guarantee that any conversation you overhear from a fellow student will contain at least one of the above listed words, and if you’re lucky might even combine them in a sentence such as “Kept getting sconced at a crew date last night, got fined for wearing sub fusc out. 9am tute was horrific, might have to rusticate because I’m always pidging my essays late”. What language is this? No-one has any idea, but it made us want to come here.

Then there’s the fact that we can imitate Brideshead and lie around on the lawns living the high life (well, we could if it wasn’t forbidden to step on the stuff). We can go punting on a daily basis (largely because there’s nothing else to do) and witness our friends gracelessly falling in the water, empty bottle of Pimm’s shamelessly in hand and dignity floating along the river Cherwell like a washed up whale.

When we’re not doing that, we can request Bod books from the strange concept of ‘stacks’, in an attempt to look studious and fulfil the expectations the world has of us (not really understanding what a ‘stack’ is, however, I think I might let them down).

Aside from all of that, Oxford is a place full of impressive architecture, extraordinary opportunities and extravagant balls, and although we might take it for granted as we sit in its “dreaming spires” at 4 o’clock in the morning desperately searching for something to say in a miserably dying essay, it really is an amazing place to be.

Even those early morning essay crises are part of the appeal, however; people are drawn to the place for its unceasingly fast pace. The work hard, play hard ethic means every term is intense, nothing is done in halves. We learn how to argue a case whilst still hung-over from the night before, to blag our way through tutes still bleary-eyed, and to get used to being ill 24/7 without mummy there to nurse us with Calpol. To summarise, we learn to balance a stressful life with a social one, all whilst dressing up in strange clothes on a worryingly regular basis and imagining we’re in some sort of hedonistic 19th century novel. If all that wasn’t enough, we’ve got Hassan’s, horrendously cheesy clubs, and a hardcore (mature) raver that’s out on the town every night and that’s always there with a cheery smile to greet your drunken declarations of undying love for the legend he is…