Thursday 9th October 2025
Blog Page 1641

Bodleian renovation continues

0

 

The extensive demolition of a large 
part of the new Bodleian Library was 
revealed earlier this week as 
scaffolding came down from the 
Broad Street building site. 
The building has been undergoing 
reconstruction over the past two 
years. This new development gives 
an indication of the change that is 
taking place in the architecture of 
central Oxford.
The New Bodleian, constructed in 
the 1930’s to house a vast and varied 
collection of literature and 
manuscripts, was designed to be a 
fortress and was further reinforced 
during the bombardment of the 
Second World War. While the 
original building adhered to the 
traditional Oxford quad design, the 
new build, dubbed the Weston 
Project, hopes to open up this central 
space and make it more publicly 
accessible. The glass fronted building 
will face out onto Broad Street and 
the Old Bodleian library. The project 
is on schedule, working towards an 
opening for students in Autumn 
2014 with an official opening in 
Spring 2015. It has cost more than 
£80 million, coming from a wide 
variety of sources. 
Whilst the architect acknowledged 
that “the existing building is in one 
of the most historically sensitive 
parts of the city” it appeared that 
there was need for development. 
New reading rooms, research 
facilities and exhibition space will 
be added. With regards to the 
destruction of the building, Suzanne 
de la Rosa, a spokesperson for the 
Bodleian Libraries, said,  “in 
order for us to have the calibre 
of building and the sort of 
spaces that were needed for 
users, staff and collections the 
interior of the building did 
need to be revamped. We feel 
the end result will be a good mix 
of the old and the new.”
She added that refurbishment of 
the New Bodleian building is part of 
a larger scheme to revitalize Oxford’s 
historic Broad Street by creating a 
new public square.
De la Rosa added, “The building 
did not meet current British 
standards in terms of fire protection 
and conservation and that needed to 
be addressed. But that is not the sole 
reason for the redevelopment. This 
was the impetus to get us thinking 
about the kind of libraries that our 
users and Oxford needed and that 
was appropriate for our collections.” 
The new Library will eventually store 
a large proportion of the treasures of 
the Bodleian, including both 
Shakespeare’s first folio and the 
remaining original Magna Cartas, 
alongside thousands of other 
precious literary artefacts. 
The development is not received 
enthusiastically by all students. 
Abdul-Rahman Jama, a third year 
student at Balliol College, stated, “I 
could not possibly care less what is 
happ

The extensive demolition of a large part of the new Bodleian Library was revealed earlier this week as scaffolding came down from the Broad Street building site. 

The building has been undergoing reconstruction over the past two years. This new development gives an indication of the change that is taking place in the architecture of central Oxford.

The New Bodleian, constructed in the 1930’s to house a vast and varied collection of literature and manuscripts, was designed to be a fortress and was further reinforced during the bombardment of the Second World War.

While the original building adhered to the traditional Oxford quad design, the new build, dubbed the Weston Project, hopes to open up this central space and make it more publicly accessible. The glass fronted building will face out onto Broad Street and the Old Bodleian library. The project is on schedule, working towards an opening for students in Autumn 2014 with an official opening in Spring 2015. It has cost more than £80 million, coming from a wide variety of sources.

Whilst the architect acknowledged that “the existing building is in one of the most historically sensitive parts of the city” it appeared that there was need for development. New reading rooms, research facilities and exhibition space will be added. With regards to the destruction of the building, Suzanne de la Rosa, a spokesperson for the Bodleian Libraries, said,  “in order for us to have the calibre of building and the sort of spaces that were needed for users, staff and collections the interior of the building did need to be revamped. We feel the end result will be a good mix of the old and the new.”

She added that refurbishment of the New Bodleian building is part of a larger scheme to revitalize Oxford’s historic Broad Street by creating a new public square.

De la Rosa added, “The building did not meet current British standards in terms of fire protection and conservation and that needed to be addressed. But that is not the sole reason for the redevelopment. This was the impetus to get us thinking about the kind of libraries that our users and Oxford needed and that was appropriate for our collections.” 

The new Library will eventually store a large proportion of the treasures of the Bodleian, including both Shakespeare’s first folio and the remaining original Magna Cartas, alongside thousands of other precious literary artefacts. 

The development is not received enthusiastically by all students. Abdul-Rahman Jama, a third year student at Balliol College, stated, “I could not possibly care less what is happ

Tutors stop students going on ski trip

0

Students have expressed their irritation as University officials may prevent them leaving for the Varsity ski trip before the end of term. In an email to Senior Tutors, the Proctors reminded colleges of the regulations concerning leaving University before the end of full term.

According to University rules, “No student member shall participate in any sports tours, competitions, or training activities which involve overseas travel during Full Term, or the Thursday and Friday immediately preceding Full Term without the prior permission of: the Senior Tutor of that member’s college, society, Permanent Private Hall, or other designated institution; and the Proctors.”

In an email sent to Teddy Hall students, the Senior Tutor noted, “This large and heavily promoted trip has caused problems in previous years, not only in St Edmund Hall but also in the University at large. I am writing to let you know in good time that nobody from St Edmund Hall is permitted to go on this trip without the explicit permission of both their subject tutors and the Senior Tutor.”

When contacted about the issue, The Teddy Hall Senior Tutor, Professor Stuart Ferguson, explained that the problems lay in clashes with academic matters at the end of term. He commented, “This has caused problems in the past for obvious reasons – tutorials and practicals take place on Thursday afternoon and all day Friday. Some tutors are understandably not willing to move these to Hilary term etc. and often practicals cannot be missed.”

Although organisers of the trip have stressed that no coaches will depart before 6pm, Professor Ferguson still felt that this would not eradicate all problems, commenting, “Even though the departure time is now 6pm this is not necessarily OK. 6pm departure time means getting ready from around 5pm. There are tutorials/practicals and even Principal’s collections on the Friday afternoon and so we need to know that anyone leaving at 6 pm is not in fact needed for such activities – or to know in good time that they can be rearranged. That’s all there is to it.”

Although this appears to be a new introduction, a spokesperson for Oxford commented, “There is no new regulation regarding students who go on the Varsity Ski Trip. The Rules Committee Regulations (published in the Proctors’ and Assessor’s Memorandum) has a long-standing regulation requiring students who wish to take part in any overseas sports activities to obtain permission if travelling during full term or on the Thursday and Friday immediately preceding

Full Term. This year, as in previous years, students have simply been reminded of the regulations regarding travelling before the end of term.”

Students have reacted angrily to the news, believing it to be indicative of the University’s confused attitude towards students’ ability to manage their time alone. One student commented, “I thought we’re meant to be treated like responsible adults? Seriously, one night’s not exactly going to make much difference.”

Others took a similar view, with one second year worried by his personal tutor’s lack of response, believing that “the considerable angst caused to me and my friends by this long, three-week wait for permission has almost certainly had more of an adverse effect on my education than one night’s absence. £600 is a lot of money, after all.” Another second year took a simpler approach, commenting “It’s soooo annoying!”

Though most students faced little difficulty in obtaining permission, one student’s tutor expressed “disappointment that you have booked yourself on a trip which requires you to leave college before the end of term.”

Rival to Oxford Careers Service launches

0

 

A new careers advisory company 
has arrived in Oxford and is set to 
compete with the  University’s own 
careers service.
In the past week, ‘Career Matters’ 
has begun to attempt to build a 
customer base within the University, 
becoming a potential rival for 
Oxford University’s Careers Service.
‘Career Matters’ is a private 
company which, for a variety of set 
fees, offers a number of services to 
students to help them with their 
career choice. Their initial offer has 
been to give two students from a 
college a free careers consultation 
before introducing their lowest 
priced package, £197 plus VAT, to the 
rest of the student body. Offering 
three kinds of services from a basic 
test and feedback session to assess 
your strengths and weaknesses, 
through to CV and interview advice, 
the service’s prices range from £197 
to £397 plus VAT.
These prices are in stark contrast 
to the University’s careers service 
which provides a range of facilities 
and assistance free of charge. 
Director Jonathan Black told 
Cherwell, “We are aware of this 
organisation and the offer they 
have tried to make to students. We 
recognise that there are many such 
firms offering these paid-for services 
and have no intention of restraining 
their trade; however, we are unclear 
why any student would spend 
significant funds on a commercial 
service that they can access for 
free as part of the services they are 
entitled to at Oxford.” 
With services such as unlimited 
1:1 guidance meetings with 
experienced careers advisers, 
training events in CV writing and 
interviews and a whole number of 
events and career fairs, some people 
have questioned the need for outside 
competition.
Helen Robb, a 3rd year PPEist, 
argued, “Our careers service is an 
invaluable resource for everyone 
who is studying at Oxford. I can’t 
see why anyone would go anywhere 
else.”
OUSU president David 
Townsend echoed this sentiment, 
commenting, “Students should be 
wary of expensive private providers, 
especially where there’s a much 
more comprehensive, free service 
provided by the University. ‘
The University careers service is 
regularly utilised by the student 
body and its results paint a 
seemingly successful picture. 
One JCR Careers representative 
said, “Oxford already has a truly 
fantastic careers service. It’s a 
service that has proved invaluable 
to the 90% of Oxford grads who get 
into employment or further study 
within six months of completing 
their degree. With the legacy of 
recession, that’s a good statistic,’
The service is not without its 
flaws however, as the Careers 
representative added, “The 
problem that needs to be addressed 
isn’t the volume of Careers advice, 
but the accessibility between 
colleges and their utilization of the 
wider University service.”

A new careers advisory company has arrived in Oxford and is set to compete with the University’s own careers service.

In the past week, ‘Career Matters’ has begun to attempt to build a customer base within the University, becoming a potential rival for Oxford University’s Careers Service.

‘Career Matters’ is a private company which, for a variety of set fees, offers a number of services to students to help them with their career choice. Their initial offer has been to give two students from a college a free careers consultation before introducing their lowest priced package, £197 plus VAT, to the rest of the student body. Offering three kinds of services from a basic test and feedback session to assess your strengths and weaknesses, through to CV and interview advice, the service’s prices range from £197 to £397 plus VAT.

These prices are in stark contrast to the University’s careers service which provides a range of facilities and assistance free of charge. Director Jonathan Black told Cherwell, “We are aware of this organisation and the offer they have tried to make to students. We recognise that there are many such firms offering these paid-for services and have no intention of restraining their trade; however, we are unclear why any student would spend significant funds on a commercial service that they can access for free as part of the services they are entitled to at Oxford.” 

With services such as unlimited 1:1 guidance meetings with experienced careers advisers, training events in CV writing and interviews and a whole number of events and career fairs, some people have questioned the need for outside competition.

Helen Robb, a 3rd year PPEist, argued, “Our careers service is an invaluable resource for everyone who is studying at Oxford. I can’t see why anyone would go anywhere else.”

OUSU president David Townsend echoed this sentiment, commenting, “Students should be wary of expensive private providers, especially where there’s a much more comprehensive, free service provided by the University.

‘The University careers service is regularly utilised by the student body and its results paint a seemingly successful picture. One JCR Careers representative said, “Oxford already has a truly fantastic careers service. It’s a service that has proved invaluable to the 90% of Oxford grads who get into employment or further study within six months of completing their degree. With the legacy of recession, that’s a good statistic.’

The service is not without its flaws however, as the Careers representative added, “The problem that needs to be addressed isn’t the volume of Careers advice, but the accessibility between colleges and their utilization of the wider University service.”

Review: The Handyman

0

Looking through the program to The Handyman before the curtain goes up, it’s near impossible not to be impressed. An Oscar winning writer (Ronald Harwood), a highly respected director (Joe Harmston) and several very well-known actors (Timothy West, Vanessa Redgrave, Steven Berkoff, Adrian Lukis). The calibre of those involved was clear from the off: Harwood’s observation of the upper-middle class couple was pitch-perfect, whilst West’s Kozachenko (the handyman) was extremely convincing. All the elements were there. How odd, then, to walk away from the performance feeling completely flat.

The drama centres around the handyman himself, accused of war crimes committed fifty years previously. Central too are the couple who have employed him and treated him as one of the family in the intervening years. The plot seems to be not about the man or his supposed crimes, but operates at a remove throughout. Much of the focus is on the couple: we see their emotional reaction and collapse following the accusation. They are wittily observed and often bitingly satiric, but it is difficult to feel any kind of sympathies for them even in these circumstances. Drama of atrocity makes for a very uncomfortable bed-fellow with the almost Noel Coward-like class-conscious satire.

Moreover, the tendency to piggyback the kind of issues more readily associated with these character types (marital problems, gender imbalance, money) along with their general unhappiness at the revelation means they can’t help but look completely petty when contrasted with the harrowing first-hand accounts of the slaughter of innocents. The audience is left, then, feeling that they would be equally as small minded were they affected by these problems, and yet it is nearly impossible to engage with what might have been the emotional crux of the play. Other than one brief chilling turn by Steven Berkoff and a moving one by Vanessa Redgrave as witnesses to the crime, the reaction to the crime itself, not just its revelation, is never dealt with.

If the intention was to show the impossibility of comprehending the horror of these events from our own comfortable lives, then it seems to have been achieved. Nonetheless the effect is an odd one. So many issues are raised in such a short space of time that there’s never any real chance to deal with any of them. For the actors themselves, this unfortunately means that despite some finely-tuned performances there is never any real chance for them to grab our attention or to connect with the audience on any meaningful level.

Review: The Real Inspector Hound

0

The Real Inspector Hound is an odd, yet humorous and enjoyable experience. Tom Stoppard’s play-within-a-play satirises two egotistical theatre critics: Moon (Ed Barr-Sim), a bitter and obsessive second-stringer for his rival Higgs, and Birdboot (Sam Carter), a dashing, charismatic womaniser who is constantly defending his devotion to his wife.

Carter and Barr-Sim make a strong pair. Their rapport extends well beyond the dialogue, which won’t disappoint Stoppard fans. The intimate space of the Burton Taylor is skilfully transformed into the claustrophobic country retreat of Muldoon Manor, the setting for this Christie-esque whodunit. The characters are portrayed at the height of farce, with enough sharp head-turns and intakes of breath to keep the audience tittering for most of the hour. But it is Mrs Drudge (Phoebe Hames), the Essex housekeeper, who really steals the show. Hames’s hilarious background acting, overly vigorous eyebrows, docile smile and fine accent, together lend themselves to a perfect characterization of the wily domestic servant.  

Yet in the fitting words of Moon, “the second half fails to live up to the promise of the first”. Compared to the perfect pitching of the first act, the second could have benefited from a few more rehearsals. This dip in quality could be attributable to the central role falling squarely on Moon. While confusion is inherent to his character, Barr-Sim struggles to grasp the audience’s attention or sympathy to the same extent as Carter, who fits his philandering role as well as he does his suit. When he breaks the fourth wall to answer a stage telephone call from his wife, his dry reply – “I told you never to ring me at work” – is hilarious, a credit to his strong performance.  

The costumes and props are excellent, although possibly too authentic. The major’s wooden wheelchair, for example, is prone to collapse, but this only adds to the humour and the actors recovered well with a quick replacement.

On the whole, no actor is ever lost in Stoppard’s dialogue – no mean feat – and the audience are kept constantly laughing or enthralled in the melodramatic action. With dead bodies and double identities galore, The Real Inspector Hound is a well-acted treat for fans of murder mystery.

FOUR STARS

Report – Oxtoberfest @ The Duke’s Cut

0

To find out more, about the Duke’s Cut, visit www.thedukescut.com. 

André Villas-Boas: Earning his Spurs?

0

Daniel Levy isn’t regarded as a man to shy away from a gamble or two. The notoriously hardball playing Tottenham Hotspur chairman often gets what he wants. But when André Villas-Boas was announced as Harry Redknapp’s successor – four months after his ignominious exit from Stamford Bridge – some thought that Levy had finally overstepped the mark.

Reputation, though, had clouded the judgement of many Spurs supporters. Villas-Boas was as much a victim of circumstance as he was of himself at Chelsea. He opted for revolution as opposed to evolution. His sacking was inevitable and Chelsea winning the FA Cup and UEFA Champions League was vindication of that. But buoyed by the knowledge that his stock has remained high, the 35-year-old Portuguese man has arrived at Spurs a reformed character – ready to put his previous wrongs right and to lead his side into the coveted top four of the Barclays Premier League.

If Redknapp baked the Spurs cake, then Villas-Boas has been charged with decorating it. And rather than overhauling the framework, the former Porto manager has sensibly tweaked his squad. Luka Modrić and Rafeal van der Vaart may have departed but in Jan Vetonghen and Moussa Dembélé, Villas-Boas has both European experience, and in the case of the latter, a man well versed in the rough and tumble of the Barclays Premier League. And with some of the more established stars, amongst them Scott Parker, currently occupying the sidelines, Villas-Boas has genuine options at his disposal.

Furthermore, reputation, it seems, now counts for little. Instead, Spurs is a meritocracy. Centre-back Steven Caulker, who served his apprenticeship at Swansea City last season, has come through the ranks whilst the Brazilian defensive midfielder Sandro has become more ambitious in his passing and a commanding presence in the centre of midfield. But it is Jermain Defoe, who appeared surplus to requirements under Redknapp, who has epitomised this newfound philosophy. The England forward has been rewarded for his goalscoring prowess with a regular place in the starting XI, keeping one Emmanuel Adebayor warming the bench.

All the signs point towards a man who has learned the importance of team chemistry and communication – both of which where his downfall at Stamford Bridge. Gone are the days of ‘Crouching André, Hidden Villas-Boas’ – of the intense and, at times, combative individual. Now he appears relaxed and ready to foster the collective ‘team spirit’ principle in which he prides himself on. There are no cliques. Each player is treated equally, be it Brad Friedel or his younger goalkeeping understudy Hugo Lloris. And the Spurs players have responded emphatically: they’re ready to understand his ideology.

Just as with his treble-winning Porto side of 2010-2011, Spurs have, in patches, played with attacking intent and always with the ball on the playing surface, as was demonstrated to great effect in their first-half performance against Manchester United in September, where Spurs recorded their first win since 1989. Throughout the team, especially on the wings, there is genuine pace and purpose, symbolized none more so than by the electric Welsh wizardry of Gareth Bale, undoubtedly the jewel in Villas-Boas’ crown. Nonetheless, it is still too early to determine whether the squad possesses enough experience and depth to take the club to the next level.

Although Villas-Boas remains prone to tactical naivety, he has demonstrated an equal measure of flexibility – QPR at home being the case in point. Trailing 0-1 at half-time, Villas-Boas shifted his back four, moving Vertonghen out from centre-back to left-back, Bale onto the left-wing and Clint Dempsey to occupy the hole in behind Defoe. The changes paid dividends. Spurs went on two win 2-1. Dempsey, though, remains a square peg in a round whole whilst Gylfi Sigurðsson has yet to make the same waves as he did during his loan spell at Swansea City last season.

Two defeats in nine Barclays Premier League games and undefeated in the Europa League this season, Spurs encouraging start has, momentarily, silenced the naysayers. Reinvented and revitalized, the real André Villas-Boas is on his feet and ready to be counted.

Twitter: @aleksklosok

Review: It’s a Knockout

0

Hidden away in Cowley’s Pegasus Theatre, five comedians entered into a comedy battle. In spite of their best intentions, It’s a Knockout Comedy Improv Show was more school drama lesson than hilarious comedy show. The problems started early on when Kevin Tomlinson declared to his fellow actors “I don’t want anything too wacky or interesting,” a real issue when your medium requires absurdity to amuse. This was, however, surpassed by his later assertion that he was “not trying to be funny.”

 Despite the occasional worrying signs, such as the moment when Tomlinson asked an audience member about her parents’ divorce, there were some genuinely funny moments.  A sketch that involved reading out song lyrics was reminiscent of hilarious games of consequences played on  school trips. Perhaps the funniest moment was when an audience member, who volunteered to participate in a flirting scene, was told to “F*** off” by Tomlinson. Rather remorsefully, Tomlinson, who was playing a frumpy female, then suggested they should not “end it like this”, to which the audience member replied “lots of people have.”

 Overall, the show lacked the spontaneity and free movement necessary for successful comedy improvisation. Unaided by Tomlinson, who redirected the other cast members whenever a sketch started to go down a route which he did not approve, the actors failed to produce many laughs in the first half. The interference from Tomlinson and his compulsion to alert the audience to the meaning of technical theatrical terms made the show look unifinished and gave the slightly uncomfortable feeling of butting in on a rehearsal. The show did improve in the second half, but the ending felt bizarre and distinctly unamusing. Dressed up as his grandfather, complete with wig and mask, Tomlinson recapped the sketches that had come before. This final sketch was overly long and slightly irritating to an audience who had already witnessed all these humorous snippets within the past hour.

 All in all, It’s a Knockout Comedy Improv Show was clunky and slow. Not a bad way to spend eight pounds if you want to learn about the theory behind comedy improvisation, but an evening down the bar would probably be far funnier. That said, many audience members seemed to enjoy the warm atmosphere and occasional laughs. The show is performed once a month, so perhaps with  another four weeks to prepare there could be some marked improvement.

 THREE STARS