Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 1641

Tough road ahead for Andy Murray

0

In the space of four sets on Centre Court yesterday, Andy Murray ‘lost a match and won the heart of a nation” as author Tony Parsons put it, to Roger Federer. 

Post-match comments about the “two champions” in the match flooded in, like the tears down Murray’s cheeks. Actor Russell Crowe even tweeted, ‘Andy Murray, you are a champion in my eyes’.

Murray’s reaction to his defeat was emotional, apologetic and endearing but it didn’t change the result of the match. Yes, we saw beneath the rugged, taciturn exterior of Andy Murray, the tennis player, and got a glimpse of Andy Murray, the young man, but ultimately, the crowd’s ‘sustained applause, collectively placing an empathetic arm around [his] shoulder’ (Tom Fordyce, BBC) will not bring him any closer to winning a grand slam title at the fifth time of asking.

Their empathy, like a parent’s ‘don’t worry son, it’ll all be okay’, only endorses the monolithic phrase of sporting mediocrity, that ‘it’s not the winning that counts, it’s the taking part that matters’. How naive, how glib.

We could endow Murray’s match against Federer with a kind of patriotic grandeur, basking in the historical significance of our first Wimbledon finalist since Fred Perry, 76 years ago, but this is no time for a typically Anglo-Saxon appraisal of courage in defeat.

The facts remain unaltered by emotion. Murray was quite simply outplayed by a much better player. He managed only 56% of his first serves; produced only three-quarters as many winners and converted less than a third of his break points. On numerous occasions the crowd was forced to watch on helplessly as Murray let 40-15 leads slip to deuce and, crucially, failed to convert a number of games that he should have won.

In that light, this is no time to exhort second place. Although Murray was indeed aggressive, and showed more than fleeting glimpses of true brilliance, it is ultimately the winning and not the taking part that counts. To misappropriate Talladega Nights’ Ricky Bobby, ‘if you ain’t 1st you’re last’. Only the British crowd, it seems, want to remember second place.

Murray’s old coach, Miles Maclagan, said afterwards that ‘Andy has almost resisted being liked, he has wanted to be liked for winning titles, not for who he is’. Teary-eyed moments, like yesterday, come dangerously close to blurring this boundary between the articulate young man he is off-court, and the ruthless champion that he needs to become. Tennis is more than a game; winning matches is not for mere enjoyment but a profession. Murray neither needs our sympathy, nor he another British” nearly-man” like Tim Henman: never quite good enough to win a grand slam.

He should therefore not be consoled with clichéd platitudes like ‘it’ll be alright, just stick at it’. I was thus encouraged to see, when reading his BBC Sport column, that Murray is ‘more determined than ever’ and acknowledges the pain of Sunday’s defeat.

As Al Pacino famously declares in ‘Any Given Sunday’, and Hawk-Eye reminds us, ‘life’s this game of inches … one half a step too late or too early and you don’t quite make it. One half second too slow, too fast and you don’t quite catch it’.

Murray must remember the pain of this defeat and disappointment because it will help him to make those extra inches, to strain a bit harder for that drop shot, to run a bit harder as he charges along the baseline, and hopefully leave Wimbledon next year with a grand slam title under his belt.

 

Euro 2012: International football back on top

0

Let’s face it: the last major international football tournament was something of a disappointment, promising much but failing to deliver.

In ‘The First World Cup On African Soil’, no team carried the hopes of the continent beyond the quarter finals, and the competition as a whole was blighted by controversy, negative tactics, and the twin curse of the Jabulani and the vuvezela.

Precisely the opposite could be said of these enjoyable Euros. The tournament got underway quietly: an underwhelming opening ceremony preceded an unglamorous first contest between Poland and Greece, both of which were overshadowed by the darkening clouds of racism and fan violence that so preoccupied the media. However, those clouds dispersed peacefully, and the football itself has, for once, been the only real talking point.

Thankfully, there has been much to talk about. For all that the Champions League has done for the profile and standing of club football, the evident and poignant anguish of Italy’s players in the aftermath of their final defeat was a timely reminder that international football still captures the imagination of players and fans like nothing else.

The modern footballer, like modern football itself, often gives the impression of being cynical and soulless: yet Balotelli, Pirlo, Ronaldo, Gerrard and many others produced some of the finest and most resonant performances of their careers in Poland and Ukraine. Their motivations seemed to be glory and pride, rather than greed or shallow self-advancement.

But this tournament was far more than just a story of individuals. Each of the successful teams integrated star players into tactically disciplined collectives: none more so than the champions, Spain. 

Moreover, the two teams that reached the final enshrined traditional, lofty football virtues of technique, control and creativity, ensuring that the more pragmatic virtues of recent times: physical conditioning, pace and functionality, though of course omnipresent, were everywhere touched by the sublime.

Nowhere did this balance find better expression than in the two stars of the tournament, Pirlo and Iniesta: likeable, honest, hardworking, physically unremarkable, technically outstanding, tactically sensitive, and full of imaginative genius.

Both seem to take an uncynical and childlike delight in playing beautiful football, fuelled by a fierce competitive spirit that is unusually joyous and creative rather than aggressive or destructive.

Under the sway of this spirit, the competition throughout possessed a quiet and tense drama, punctuated occasionally by the brutality of penalty kicks or by the dull predictability of a one-sided victory.

But frequent cards, play acting, malicious tackles and abuse of officials –  the unwanted pests of the modern game – surfaced rarely, if at all. The refereeing was for the most part gloriously anonymous.

And nobody had much to say about the Adidas ball.  

Oxford-developed bionic eye restores sight

0

Two blind British men have regained partial sight after light receptors developed by Oxford researchers were implanted into their retinas.

Chris James and Robin Millar were fitted with eletronic retinas during a trial coordinated by Oxford University. Both men have retinitis pigmentosa, a rare hereditary condition which causes the light sensing cells in the retina to degrade over time eventually leading to blindness. 3,000 to 4,000 people in Europe suffer from the disease.

The retinal implants were developed in Germany. The method consists of 1,500 light sensing diodes sending impulses through the healthy optic nerve. This is a low resolution compared to a natural retina, which has tens of millions of light sensitive ‘rod’ and ‘cone’ cells. Previous implants produced by US ‘Second Sight’ depended upon an external camera attached to sunglasses.

The sight differs to normal sight, consisting of horizontal and vertical flashes of light. It takes several days for the brain to meaningfully interpret the information being received.

The 3 millimetre microchips were researched by Merton Fellow and Professor of Ophthalmology, Robert MacLaren. James Ramsden of University Hospitals and Markus Groppe, an academic clinical lecturer, performed the operation.

Chris James, who received his implant in Oxford, could identify the curve of a plate after 10 years of blindness. The other recipient, Robin Millar, called the implant “an extraordinary thing” and has begun dreaming in colour for the first time in 15 years. The results have exceeded the expectations of Professor MacLaren, who had hoped that under best conditions patients might see the top letter of an eye chart.

If trial success continues the retinal implant may join the cochlear implant, which has helped over 150,000 people worldwide regain some hearing. ‘The blind shall see and the deaf shall hear’ used to be gospel miracles, now for some it will be a bionic success.

The two men are first among 12 trial operations, some of which will take place at the Oxford Eye Hospital. 

Environmentalism conference brings big names to Oxford

0

Former US president Bill Clinton, Oscar-winning film director James Cameron, and documentary maker and environmentalist Sir David Attenborough are among the speakers attending a conference at Oxford next week.

The convention, ReSource 2012, which will be hosted by the University on July 12th-13th, hopes to find a solution to the problem of resource scarcity and volatility through commercial investment.

The convention and its 250 thinkers and leaders will meet in Exam Schools and the Ashmolean for two days, in association with the Smith School of Enterprise and Environment and The Rothschild Foundation.

ReSource 2012 aims to overcome the problem that our current model of growth is unsustainable. The event looks to “generate new ways of thinking about critical global issues” and to do this in collaboration with industry, creating an economy striving toward a long term goal of efficient and profitable resource use.

The array of speakers will include John Brock, CEO and Chairman of Coca-Cola Enterprises, Peter Brabeck, Chairman of Nestlé, Jeremy Grantham, the founder of GMO, a large investment fund, and the University’s own Chancellor, Baron Patten of Barnes. James Cameron will give a presentation as the participants dine in the Ashmolean.

Sir David King, Co-Director of the event, said “CEOs and investors must realise now more than ever that profitability need not rely on increased resource use.

The international financial community has the power to enact huge change to the current global system. Companies need to address these issues head-on and understand that resource efficiency and longer term thinking are potent drivers of shareholder value.’ Sir David King is
former Chief Scientific adviser to the Government.

Whilst the convention is academically focused, there is still an appeal to the public. But King was keen to add the event hopes to “move away from the scaremongering and negative perceptions” sometimes associated with environmentalism.

It is perhaps an untimely moment to appeal to the leaders of industry to take a role in what is sometimes perceived as a charitable cause as Bob Diamond was forced to resign from Barclays this week. However, the event hopes to demonstrate that an appreciation of the problem can
open up opportunities that need not require a magnanimous attitude, but a traditional capitalist one.

The fusion of industry and academics at Oxford University shows a keenness for the institution to use its theoretical power with industry to realise the potential to solve global problems.

When asked about this merger, a second year PPE student said “The coalition of industry and academia at Oxford can only be a good thing for the economy. Furthermore, closer ties may make graduation jobs easier to come by, never a bad thing.”

Campaign to save All Souls’ owned library continues

0

The lifelines for the survival of Kensal Rise library continue to persist as a petition for the restoration of library ownership to the local community nears it target of 500 signatures.

On 6th June the famous library, opened in 1900 by Mark Twain, was stripped of its books, furniture and even the plaque commemorating Twain’s involvement, by the council of the London Borough of Brent.

Originally founded as a library for the amelioration of working class residents, it was closed following the decision by Brent council in 2010 to close 6 of the 12 libraries in the borough due to £100m of government spending cuts.

The land was originally gifted by All Souls’ College to Brent council to be used as “a Free public library and Reading Room and for no other purpose whatsoever”. With the closure of the library, the building’s ownership reverted to All Souls’ College. Despite the council’s decision to talk with campaigners about a possible community run project, All Souls’ are currently preparing the building for an open bidding process.

Since the initial closure of the library the local community has been fighting under local leadership for the library to remain open. Previously used by people of all ages from the local community as a resource for the local special needs school through to adult computer
classes, the library’s closure led to local outcry.

The campaign, ‘Save Kensal Rise Library’ was started to lead the fight, with the charity ‘Friends of Kensal Rise Library’ set up to raise funds to support the campaign and pay for future maintenance of the building. This campaign has developed and gained attention nationwide.

Local campaigner Jodi Gramigni, one of the fight’s leading figures, commented, ‘Kensal Rise is changing, but at its heart is an urban diversity that needs to be cherished and nurtured. The library was, and is, at the heart of this community. Its value to us is incalculable, and cannot
be measured against the fleeting monetary gains that might be made by the sale or lease of the building.

‘Two centuries ago, All Souls owned most of the land in Kensal Rise. In honour of Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee, the fellows gifted a small area for a public reading room. Now, almost 112 years later, that gift has been returned to them, albeit against the wishes of the
community. And while All Souls had no part in the Library’s closing they are now in control of its fate and bear the burden of ultimate responsibility for its future.

It seems only fair that the Fellows grant us this small consideration in light of our shared history. And while our Library holds little significance to them, in the scale of the college’s wealth, it is an
irreplaceable asset to us.’

Boyd Tonkin, literary editor of the Independent, in an article that referred to All Souls’ College, added, “All Souls should comply, prove its lavish assets serve a greater purpose than the upkeep of a favoured few, and do its bit towards mitigating the chaos and error
that Brent as sown”.

The campaign has further gained official support from the MP for Rotherham, Denis MacShane, as well as backing from writers such as Alan Bennett, Jacqueline Wilson and Phillip Pullman.

The signature total for the petition on change.org continues to increase with its count at 403 signatures on 7th July.

University publishers fined over bribery scandal

0

Oxford University’s academic publishing arm, Oxford University Press (OUP), has been ordered by the High Court to pay a fine of almost £1.9 million, following the discovery that two of its African subsidiaries had been involved in corrupt activity.

An investigation found that Oxford University Press East Africa (OUPEA) and Oxford University Press Tanzania (OUPT) had made unlawful payments to government officials between 2007 and 2010, with intent to win two contracts to supply school textbooks.

Chief executive of OUP, Nigel Portwood, condemned the dealings, asserting, “We do not tolerate such behaviour. As soon as these matters came to light we acted immediately.

“The improper behaviour was confined to a small part of the global organisation but of course such conduct should not happen at all. We have strengthened our management in the region and are taking appropriate disciplinary action in respect of those involved in this conduct.’

The contracts were financed by the World Bank, which provides loans to finance infrastructure in developing countries. As part of separate remedial conditions, OUP must pay the Bank $500,000 (over £320,000), and the two subsidiaries will not be permitted to do business with it
for the next three years.

The company was approached in May 2011 after World Bank investigators raised concerns about possible misconduct. OUP immediately called upon external lawyers and forensic accountants to identify any wrongdoing.

An action was brought against OUP by the director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), resulting in an agreed penalty of £1,895,435.

OUP remain “absolutely committed to the highest standards of integrity”, highlighting that a compliance course of business ethics had been taken by all employees before the allegations emerged.

An OUP spokesperson told Cherwell, “OUP’s mission is to further research, scholarship, and education by publishing and disseminating high quality resources across the world. For that reason, it is important that we continue to operate as internationally as possible.”

She said that the University, of which OUP is a department, “fully supported the speed and comprehensiveness of OUP’s actions to resolve this matter”.

On top of the fine, OUP have announced a contribution of £2 million to not-for-profit organisations for educational schemes in sub-Saharan Africa.

Leonard McCarthy, World Bank Integrity Vice-President, praised the example set by OUP in the “thoroughness” of its investigation, but also stressed that, “This debarment is testimony to the Bank’s continued commitment to protecting the integrity of its projects.”

The World Bank has debarred more than 80 other errant firms and individuals this fiscal year, and fined publishers Macmillan £11 million in 2010 over similar allegations in Sudan.

History and English student Jack Ramsden commented that it was “refreshing to see a company committed to openly rooting out its corrupt elements”, but added, “I do wonder how OUP’s board can have failed to be aware of its subsidiaries’ practices, and why it took an
external authority to compel the central board to monitor its fringes.

“OUP needs to promote greater transparency and closer scrutiny of its devolved agencies, and demonstrate ethical and sustainable business practices. If they instigate institutional changes to their subsidiaries then this scandal should not significantly affect its reputation.”

Robin McGhee, lately of St Anne’s College, remarked, “OUP seem to have had little to actually do with the bribery directly. But it’s a shame that an otherwise wonderful organisation succumbed to the temptation of stooping far lower than they ought.”

Oxford researchers win ovarian cancer funding

0

A research project led by scientists at Oxford University has been awarded almost £180,000 by Target Ovarian Cancer UK.

Dr Ahmed Ashour Ahmed and Professor Stefan Knapp have been granted £175,299 over three years to establish whether the inhibition of the enzymes FES and FER improves the efficacy of paclitaxel (Taxol) based chemotherapy.

Paclitaxel offers a treatment for ovarian and breast cancer by interfering with microtubules which are involved in cell division, although some tumours become resistant to the therapy and can start to grow again. However, inhibiting certain proteins stabilises these microtubules and so appears to make ovarian cancer cells more sensitive to the drug.

Dr Ahmed, a Fellow of St Hugh’s College, said, “This funding will allow us to test whether amplifying the effect of paclitaxel on microtubules may result in greater cancer cell death as this could potentially be translated to better therapies for ovarian cancer patients”.

Target Ovarian Cancer is a national charity which aims to support those with ovarian cancer and to further research into treatment of the disease. In this latest funding scheme, a total of £380,296 was split between three projects, which also included an investigation into whether chemotherapy can be effective in palliative care.

The winning projects were selected by the trustees of the charity, on the advice of its Scientific Advisory Board, peer reviewers and lay reviewers, including women diagnosed with the disease. The SAB is chaired by Professor Henry Kirchener, an expert in gynaecological oncology from the University of Manchester.

In the UK, 6,500 new cases of ovarian cancer are diagnosed each year, and 12 affected women die every day. Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women.

The environment: compromise and dilution

0

Sequels, it has oft been said, are generally disappointing. Aficionados of all stripes will gloomily concur. I’m told that the worst sequel ever (surely an accolade if ever there was one) was something gloriously called Prom Night IV: Deliver Us From Evil. But – I’m truly sorry to report – even Z-list horror flicks have nothing on the latest follow-up catastrophe.

Twenty years ago, world leaders decamped to Rio de Janeiro for the most celebrated environmental meeting of the century. Rio 1992 is, still, something of a cult classic in environmental circles. It also spawned an alphabet soup of acronyms: from the CBD and the IPF to the RDED and the UNFCCC, it finally felt like the bureaucrats were seeing green. Steely optimism was in the air. I was a sprightly seven months old at the time, but I like to think I cheered.

The world has, of course, recently been treated to Rio+20, a monumental meeting feted as a turning point in an otherwise sluggish diplomatic game. It was, to put it mildly, lacklustre. As multilateral chinwags go, the new Rio was on a par with last year’s Durban meeting, a critical conference that delayed a ratified climate treaty until 2020. It might be unfair to have expected too much by way of environmental targets, and, admittedly, there were slender gains on peripheral issues. Yet Rio+20 spoke of a deeper malaise, a toxic, narcoleptic weariness that threatens to derail the aspirations expressed twenty years previously. Drift any longer and we’ll be sleepwalking into a catastrophe.

The inconvenient truth is that the globalised UN process no longer provides a credible solution to climate change (let alone the other ecological woes tabled for discussion). This leaves the world at a fatal impasse, where, for once, the path is no longer clear. The solution will likely involve a makeshift patchwork of regional agreements, and urgently resorting to ersatz bilateral initiatives to establish some kind of protection for vulnerable states.

As expected, familiar tensions were aroused: the west, somewhat evasively, played fanfares for the promised ‘green economy’, whilst developing states doggedly pursued CBDR (‘common but differentiated responsibility’). Such beleaguered countries – largely lead by the so-called “BASIC” economies – make the plausible case that duty to act should be partitioned according to historical culpability. The notorious US objection to the Kyoto Protocol – the flimsy titbit of climate legislation agreed in 1997 – turned on a refusal to tolerate such moral logic, establishing an inevitable deadlock that has impaired progress ever since. It is a marginal triumph for equitability that CBDR survived Rio+20, though translating the principle into practice will be a diplomatic headache.

The ‘green economy’ mantra, conversely, has yet to prove its credentials. On the one hand, the recognition that GDP is a one-dimensional social metric is a welcome one: we need a broader, more progressive measure of development, based on ‘natural capital’. And yet, nobody is particularly sure what it means. Recalibrating the economic system for this age of enlightened environmentalism is a radical and laudable aim, but – claim detractors – the ‘green economy’ movement does no such thing; rather, it is a vacuous smokescreen for business-as-usual growth . The critics may well be right. Indeed, Caroline Spelman, the UK’s environment secretary, recently provoked ecological ire in claiming that full-blown sustainable development was not, despite appearances, oxymoronic. For ‘green economy’ advocates, the perceived trade-off between economic growth and environmental welfare is a dangerous illusion

I can’t help feeling that we should simply bite the proverbial bullet and take the bolder line: Spelman may well be right, but the green case does not rest on it’s being compatible with economic development. If we are serious about arresting the ever-deepening extinction crisis, we should – to put things bluntly – be prepared to pay for it.

In hindsight, it seems that Rio+20 was dead before it started. With electoral and economic distractions at home, many key players (including Angela Merkel and Barack Obama) simply ignored the invitation. Environmental and social welfare has slipped, fatally, off the agenda. Aware of this modern lassitude, Brazil’s draft text (which eventually became the conference’s final output) was self-consciously bland, a modest affirmation of platitudes to which nobody could object.

However much it pains me to say it, this listless conference has taught me one thing. In a desperate choice between Prom Night IV and Rio+20, I think I know which one I’d choose. These are dark days indeed.


The best festivals you’ve never heard of

0

1) Burning Man Festival, Black Rock City, Nevada

This is an unconventional one. Each summer close to 50,000 festival-goers gather in the Nevada desert for eight days of hedonism, climaxing in the burning of a giant, Wickermanesque effigy. During those eight days there are no rules, other than the prohibition of any form of cash – instead there exists a barter economy. Those who attend don’t perceive the Burning Man as a festival but as the formation of a desert community. Participants form ‘villages’ and enjoy a ‘contemporary community dedicated to radical self-expression and radical self-reliance’. They can create their own ‘mutant vehicle’ – an adapted street vehicle – yet it must be unrecognisable as one. All those who attend are on an equal footing while at the festival, they even discarded the main stage a few years ago because it created division between the audience and performers. Everyone is welcome to take part.

2) Gathering of the Juggalos, Illinois:

Not one for the faint hearted. A Juggalo is someone ‘who’s down with the clowns ’til they’re dead in the ground.’ AKA, fans of acts such as the Insane Clown Posse – a ‘horror-themed’ rap duo, invariably bedecked in clownish facepaint. Those who call themselves a ‘Juggalo’ (including Charlie Sheen and Vanilla Ice among others) call it a family and the Gathering of the Juggalos is their home. For fans of ICP’s violent rap, the ‘Gathering’ is a “family-fun-times-underground-hardcore-hip-hop” music festival. This strange synthesis of an emphasis on family, violent music, drinking (and in some cases drug taking), has even been documented, well worth a watch: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/27/newdocumentary- sheds-lig_n_984096.html

3) Expecto Patronum:

On a more light-hearted note, this was a Harry Potter-dedicated festival in 2009. Although not strictly musical, they did feature a bunch of Harry Potter-themed Wizard Rock (Wrock) bands: Draco and the Malfoys, The 8th Horcrux, Harry and the Potters, Solitary Snape and Swedish Shortsnouts. Sadly it was only a one-off festival.

4) All Tomorrow’s Parties, East Sussex:

An alternative to the larger UK festivals. ATP is sponsorship-free and all the organisers, artists and fans camp together in the Camber Sands Holiday Camp. The line-up is curated by a different artist each year, and is described by its founder as ‘like an excellent mix tape compiled by your favourite musicians’. ATP is seen by festival-goers as a rare opportunity to take a trip through an artist’s record collection, and thus features all the legends as well as those more obscure artists you could imagine. Past Curators of ATP have included Mogwai, Pavement, Belle & Sebastian, Animal Collective, Mudhoney, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Devendra Banhart, Dinosaur Jr, The Shins, Thurston Moore, Sonic Youth, The Dirty Three and Portishead. ATP has achieved such a level of cult status that a film has even been made about it: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0870210/

5) Shambhala Music Festival:

Canada Shambhala began in 1998 when approximately 500 people gathered at the Salmo River Ranch. It has grown into a community built upon ‘Shambhalove’. Today Shambhala is a four-day progressive electronic music festival in British Columbia’s Kootenay Mountainous forests and now features the popular ‘Acid Friday’ – need I say more? The festival is produced by a family of five, takes place on their farm, and does not accept any corporate sponsorship. When not hosting the festival, the 500-acre Salmo River Ranch is a working farm; however, during the festival a crew of 2000 workers and volunteers combined with ten thousand festival-goers makes Shambhala the largest city in the West Kootenays for five days – all of this on a farm without even an electricity hookup.

6) Lost Events, Sydney:

‘Lost Events’ are a group of party organisers who only reveal the location of their parties at the last minute. You buy your ticket not knowing where it will take you. The first event was called ‘Lost on Shark Island’ with everyone dressing up as castaways and catching a ferry to an island. This has since been followed up by other themed getaways, including ‘Lost at the Alter’, ‘Lost in the Badlands’ and ‘Lost in the Blitz’. A recent example was ‘Lost on the Trans Siberian’ in which attendees dressed Cold War themed outfits. ‘Lost Events’ then hired a 500-seater train, packed it full of speakers, and headed for the mountains with their revelers.

7) Snowbombing, Austria:

Snowbombing is held at the Austrian Ski Resort Mayrhofen – think Ibiza in the snow (pools and saunas) but with winter sports and traditional Austrian culture (visualise lederhosen, sausages and Oompah bands). Music and events are held in cool locations such as an igloo village, a forest clearing and a remote alpine farmstead. The most exciting part is the Snowbombing Road Trip – a drive from the UK to Mayrhofen through a series of collecting points, pitstops and the arrival procession to open the event. Past acts have included Fatboy Slim, 2manyDJs, Zane Lowe, Dizzee Rascal, Dirty Pretty Things, Grandmaster Flash and Foals.

8) Llangollen International Eisteddfod, Wales:

A slightly different one to round things off with: every year the Welsh town of Llangollen stages a six-day festival of music, dance and song, in which over 4,000 performers from across the globe head to this beautiful little town to partake. In 2005 Luciano Pavarotti added his name to the competition in recognition of his appreciation of the festival and its influence on his career. There are around 25 different competitions, climaxing with the prestigious ‘Choir of the World’ where winning choirs compete for the Pavarotti Trophy.

Smoking marijuana: the key to political success?

0

Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Alistair Darling, Nick Clegg, Louise Mensch and now, we discover Chuka Umunna, have all done it. David Cameron has made a point of not telling us whether he has or he hasn’t. Bill Clinton allegedly did so in the beer garden of Oxford’s very own Turf Tavern. David Miliband, on the other hand, has said that he never tried himself because at university he was ‘a bit square’ – mmm, funny that. The topic of discussion? Smoking marijuana, of course.

When it emerged that Bill Clinton had smoked pot in his student days as a Rhodes scholar in Oxford, it almost derailed his presidential campaign. However when Barack Obama confessed to doing the same, hardly anyone batted an eyelid. The black chalkboard propped up against the wall of The Turf, laying claim to be the place where Clinton did or did not first inhale, is now a key attraction, drawing visitors from afar to this historic pub.

In the past decade, views and attitudes towards youthful experiments with cannabis have changed beyond imagination. Across the pond it is whispered that Obama may legalise the drug as his latest big political move. Of course, it’s still a controversial topic to bring to the fore, and the hard facts aren’t available yet to back up any proposed policy. Nonetheless, with drug related violence continuing to increase in America, especially over the border in Mexico, the advocation of marijuana reform is no longer a taboo subject. With a presidential election looming that will probably be closer than most Democrats want to believe, the fact that legalising marijuana could be one of the big policies fronting Obama’s campaign sends out a pretty big statement that perceptions have changed. 

With the expenses controversy, the phone hacking furore, and now the banking scandal in full swing, politicians are desperately trying more than ever to keep ‘in touch’ with the public. Right now, every little bit helps. If that means demonstrating that they were, once at least, just like any other university student, experimenting, trying to fit in with their mates, then so be it. And all that could involve soft drugs. I’m surprised public relations gurus across the land aren’t pushing MPs to come out with it. It won’t be long now before Jacob Rees-Mogg is the next politico to admit that he was ‘rather partial to the odd puff now and again…’

Despite this growing social acceptance, however, we shouldn’t forget that the side effects of smoking marijuana are extremely dangerous. A recent report from the British Lung Foundation shows that there are established scientific links between smoking cannabis and tuberculosis, acute bronchitis and lung cancer. The risk of lung cancer from smoking cannabis is 20 times higher than that from smoking tobacco cigarettes. Smoking cannabis could also expose users to a vastly increased risk of developing a psychotic illness, such as schizophrenia. So despite the growing social acceptance, despite the increasing number of public figures admitting to having smoked cannabis and despite this show of humility, honesty and proof of being ‘in touch’, we shouldn’t just sit back and give them a pat on the back for this achievement – smoking marijuana is dangerous and in the interest of public health deserves to remain a controversial issue. Debate, anyone?