Saturday, May 3, 2025
Blog Page 1695

Blockbusters and Bueller: the 80s in film

0

The 1980s saw the explosion of the Blockbuster: following epics like Jaws (1975) and Star Wars (1977), films had to be bigger, more action-packed, and more dazzling. The highest grossing films of the decade, like the two Star Wars sequels, and the Indiana Jones franchise, revel in reckless adventure, with brilliant special effects technology, sophisticated sound tracks, mega-marketing budgets, and costly, highly-paid stars. And yet it’s easy, with the modern tendency to disguise taste under fifteen layers of irony, to only appreciate the 80s with an air of superiority, or at least as a ‘guilty pleasure’. But should anyone really feel guilty for loving Uncle Buck, or for understanding that David Bowie’s Labyrinth is literally the best thing ever? This was a time in film that was about exactly the opposite: unapologetic fun.

After MTV launched in 1981 with the words ‘Ladies and gentlemen, rock and roll!’, the impact was seen everywhere in popular culture. As studios pandered to the new and demanding ‘MTV generation’, there was an unprecedented surge in action-packed, flashy, often simplistic movies, such as Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure (1989) and Die Hard (1988). But the outpouring of films aimed at a teenage audience saw the establishment of a cinema institution: the John Hughes teen movie. Invariably honest and hilarious depictions of middle-class American high school life, Hughes’ success lay in his ability to simultaneously respect the universal conflicts and longings of his almost painfully ordinary adolescents, and find the humour within them. Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986) celebrates the importance of seeking joy in life, as Ferris’s rebellious intelligence  charms everyone around him, and even begins to transform his antithetically awkward best friend. But in ‘the simplest terms, the most convenient definition’, The Breakfast Club (1985) is the ultimate teen movie. Exploring the scramble of five members of different cliques to discover a more substantial identity, the movie examines adolescent issues of sex, drugs, abuse, suicide both faithfully and subversively. But if the angst of stereotyping ‘a brain, an athlete, a basket case, a princess, and a criminal’ feels a little dated, then Michael Lehmann’s Heathers (1989) provides bite and modern wit which still resonates. A dark comedy satirising competitive teen popularity, Heathers takes classroom revenge to its final conclusion: ‘teen angst bullshit has a body-count’. Full of savage one-liners (‘Did you have a brain tumour for breakfast?’) shocking violence, and an incredibly sharp performance from Winona Ryder, this film stands out against its earnest and euphoric contemporaries, and even now remains fresher than it’s descendant Mean Girls (2004).

But the unashamed enthusiasm of the decade is most exuberantly captured in its delight in pop music, as characters across the spectrum dance, mime and sing with youthful joy and playfulness. From the archetypal Adventures in Babysitting opening, to Marty McFly’s ‘new sound’, to the unabashed, childish physical comedy of Beetlejuice’s Banana Boat Song, the vibrant effervescence of the 80s big musical numbers captures the spirit of the decade in cinema. Even touching its darker instances (Platoon’s moment of relief comes as a Tracks of my Tears singalong, heart-breaking in its humanity in contrast with the grim war scenes, and the poignancy of the laughing soldiers belting the lyric “Although I might be laughing loud and hearty, deep inside I’m blue”) the release of musical expression is undeniable. But yet again it’s Hughes who does it best, with the Breakfast Club’s detention disco, Duckie Dale’s frantic Otis impression, and Ferris Bueller’s unforgettable parade scene as 10,000 people twist and shout along with him. In Ferris’s immortal words, ‘Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it’, and this defiant thirst for rebellious fun is what the 80s was all about.

Review: Chronicle

0

I would have liked to have been psychic as a teenager. There’s something reassuring about knowing that, in one of those scalding adolescent moments, you can make somebody’s kidneys explode with a thought. Secretly being psychic, or a superhero, or a wizard, or possibly a martial artist, would be fantastic in that awkward period when you’re hoping to become an alpha male, but seem to be able to do little but grow slowly hairier.

On second thought, it is probably just as well teenage boys are not psychic. Take, for example, Chronicle, where three high-school kids find a crystal thing down a hole near a warehouse rave (‘What did Jung say about glowsticks?’) and develop the power to move objects around slightly unconvincingly with their minds. Naturally it all goes fatally wrong before 83 minutes are up.

Chronicle’s gag is that, like Cloverfield or The Blair Witch Project or all those other movies, it has been filmed by the characters themselves. So in dull moments you can play a game of ‘What exactly are the chances that someone happened to be filming this dramatically significant moment?’ It is partly explained by the fact that one character is a misfit with a thing for filming his life. ‘You don’t think it’s weird? Like it puts a barrier between you and everything else?’ ‘Maybe I want a barrier.’ Or maybe he just has his eye on the film rights.

With its shaky handheld camera, Chronicle keeps its superkids in a real-ish world of high-school angst. (Although each looks roughly twenty-five.) There is less battling the forces of evil than doing magic tricks to impress girls and then sulking. Angst-bitten teen superheroes may not be head-explodingly new. But in Chronicle the multicoloured lycra and the supervillain never actually turn up. The boys are too busy devastating the Pacific Northwest themselves.

Chronicle is a surprisingly good debut film. But it shows its immaturity a little. The boys’ CGI psychic powers look a bit wobbly. Floating objects tend not to move at quite the same rate as the purposeful limbs or clenched temples thrust towards them. And the characters I could swear I have seen before in my pyjamas in some More4 teen drama or other.

But overall, rather like finding a big psychic crystal down a hole near a warehouse rave, Chronicle is an unexpected treat. It just may not quite blow your mind.

4 stars

Quaintrelle Anarchist

0

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%5045%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

Why ‘Quaintrelle Anarchist’?

I chose the name because I thought it described what I like and what I make rather well; cute but crazed, sweet but a little disturbing. I like juxtaposition!

 

 Can you describe your label?

I hand-make clothing and accessories as well as selling hand-sourced vintage items and re-working vintage clothing. I would say the style is rather varied because I like so many different styles myself.

 

What inspired you to start selling your clothing and accessories online?

I’ve always sewn and crafted and thought for a long time that I wanted to have my own label. It was really a case of finding the right time to set it up! I chose to base my shop online (as opposed to in a market or shop) because I’m always moving around so I need to be able to take my ‘shop’ with me which is easy if it’s virtual.

 

What kind of person do you see wearing your products?

Anyone who likes them! Most probably someone who likes things that are a little different and unique as I never make the same item twice.

 

Where are your products most popular?

I’ve sold the most items to America so far and then England.

 

You are currently reading Oriental Studies and have lived in Japan. Do you think this has had an effect on your work?

Definitely. There are some inspiring subcultures in Japan as well as great crafting supplies and I have new ideas for things to make every time I return. It’s far from my only inspiration or interest though as I’m also inspired by music I listen to, painters and illustrators I like and most other things in between.

 

How do you manage your business and your studies?

I stockpile by making things for my shop during the holidays so in term all I have to do is list new items on my shop every so often and ship orders so I don’t think it takes up too much time. I have many sewing marathons in the holidays but luckily the holidays are so long.

 

What kind of response have you had from your friends at your college?

My friends have said good things about my shop which is nice and I don’t think they were surprised I started a shop because I’m always wearing thing’s I’ve designed and made.

 

Would you recommend having an Etsy/online shop as a part-time job for a student?

Definitely. Because the shop is online you can put as much or little time into it as you want so if you have a busy week you can just ship orders and not put any new items up. I would only recommend having one of you really enjoy making things and have time to put your shop out there on the internet though because that does take quite a bit of effort. I really enjoy it and love finding other people’s shops so of course I’d recommend it.


What is the best thing about running your own business?

I always get excited when I ship an item to somewhere that I’ve never been myself like Brazil or Finland because I think it’s so strange/amazing that someone there will be walking around wearing something I made. Getting really nice feedback is also rewarding as is deciding when you work and being able to look as you please. Then there’s the fact that people will essentially pay you to do something you love, that’s great too.

 

Will you carry it on after you graduate? If not, what are your plans?

I will not only continue but I plan to expand my shop to include things such as my paintings, more elaborate garments and handmade dolls because I will have more time to work on them.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%5047%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

Photos by Charles Shepherd at RoomC Photography

 

Visit Isabelle’s Etsy shop here and her blog here

Ebdon criticises Oxford

0

Professor Les Ebdon has been formally announced as head of the university fair access body, despite opposition from MPs on the selection committee.

Business Secretary Vince Cable has rejected attempts to block Professor Ebdon as the head of OFFA (the Office for Fair Access), which aims to “safeguard and promote fair access to higher education.”
Professor Ebdon caused controversy after referring to national university rankings as “a snobs’ table” which guarantees that “institutions like Cambridge and Oxford are always at the front, while newer places bring up the rear.”
He also condemned the UK’s “Oxbridge obsession,” referred to the “well-off and well-heeled” Russell Group as “these people,” and claimed that for privately educated students, the rise in tuition fees “might not seem an awful lot of money.” 
Russell Group Director General Dr Wendy Piatt told Cherwell, “We sincerely hope that the new director of OFFA will come to recognise the tough challenges we face in trying to widen access.” 
However she expressed concern that, “The access agreements risk focusing too much on regulation rather than resolving the real problems. The emphasis on targets and powers for OFFA could distract attention, effort and resources from the many successful access schemes run by Russell Group universities or even disincentivise universities from continuing with some activities in deprived areas which target the students who are the hardest to reach.”
Nadia Odunayo, a second year student at University College, agreed, commenting, “Les Ebdon clearly wants to make big changes, but it is important that he does not lose sight of where the real problems lie. A big factor in the whole access issue is to do with problems that begin at school level and the underlying weakness in many applicants is not solved by merely putting pressure on universities to accept a more diverse range of students.”
Corpus Christi student Samuel Newhouse noted, “Any blame attributed to universities carries the absurd assertion that a significant number of tutors, who are some of the most intelligent people in the country, carry backward, ignorant prejudices. Ebdon and a worrying number of MPs spout clichés without having truly considered the problem.”
However, some have emerged in support of Professor Ebdon’s appointment. Robin McGhee, Liberal Democrat candidate for Oxford City Council and St Anne’s undergraduate, commented, “I’m delighted Les Ebdon has been appointed OFFA director. Like me, he is a solid opponent of tuition fee increases. Unfortunately the Lib Dems had to have some trade-offs with the Tories to get him appointed. But I like to think of Coalition trade-offs as like Pokemon cards. You have to part tearfully with the shiny Blastoise but, by God, you get an Articuno in exchange.”
A spokesperson for Oxford University said, “The director of OFFA is an important role for the sector. We will continue to work constructively with the new director and look forward to welcome him in Oxford in due course.”

Professor Les Ebdon has been formally announced as head of the university fair access body, despite opposition from MPs on the selection committee.

Business Secretary Vince Cable has rejected attempts to block Professor Ebdon as the head of OFFA (the Office for Fair Access), which aims to “safeguard and promote fair access to higher education.”

Professor Ebdon caused controversy after referring to national university rankings as “a snobs’ table” which guarantees that “institutions like Cambridge and Oxford are always at the front, while newer places bring up the rear.”

He also condemned the UK’s “Oxbridge obsession,” referred to the “well-off and well-heeled” Russell Group as “these people,” and claimed that for privately educated students, the rise in tuition fees “might not seem an awful lot of money.” 

Russell Group Director General Dr Wendy Piatt told Cherwell, “We sincerely hope that the new director of OFFA will come to recognise the tough challenges we face in trying to widen access.” 

However she expressed concern that, “The access agreements risk focusing too much on regulation rather than resolving the real problems. The emphasis on targets and powers for OFFA could distract attention, effort and resources from the many successful access schemes run by Russell Group universities or even disincentivise universities from continuing with some activities in deprived areas which target the students who are the hardest to reach.”

Nadia Odunayo, a second year student at University College, agreed, commenting, “Les Ebdon clearly wants to make big changes, but it is important that he does not lose sight of where the real problems lie. A big factor in the whole access issue is to do with problems that begin at school level and the underlying weakness in many applicants is not solved by merely putting pressure on universities to accept a more diverse range of students.”

Corpus Christi student Samuel Newhouse noted, “Any blame attributed to universities carries the absurd assertion that a significant number of tutors, who are some of the most intelligent people in the country, carry backward, ignorant prejudices. Ebdon and a worrying number of MPs spout clichés without having truly considered the problem.”

However, some have emerged in support of Professor Ebdon’s appointment. Robin McGhee, Liberal Democrat candidate for Oxford City Council and St Anne’s undergraduate, commented, “I’m delighted Les Ebdon has been appointed OFFA director. Like me, he is a solid opponent of tuition fee increases. Unfortunately the Lib Dems had to have some trade-offs with the Tories to get him appointed. But I like to think of Coalition trade-offs as like Pokemon cards. You have to part tearfully with the shiny Blastoise but, by God, you get an Articuno in exchange.”

A spokesperson for Oxford University said, “The director of OFFA is an important role for the sector. We will continue to work constructively with the new director and look forward to welcome him in Oxford in due course.”

MIT to offer free online course

0

One of the world’s leading universities, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), has announced its first free course which can be studied and assessed online.

The course, 6.002x: Circuits and Electronics, which will begin in March, is an electronics course that is the first prototype of an online project, known as MITx. It is anticipated to take 10 hours per week, finishing in June.

Despite the current existence of online degree courses, the project represents major progress in the use of technology to deliver higher education. Students worldwide can study for a MIT certificate, without any entrance requirements or cost.

The university has mentioned that it would like MITx to ‘shatter barriers to education’. A spokesman also mentioned that the course is not a ‘watered down’ version of the campus course or ‘any less intense’.

The prototype is dependent on an ‘honour code’ in which students commit to behaving honestly. However, mechanisms to check identity will be implemented.

The provost of the university has commented that they are looking to experiment to discover what can be delivered by online courses and what needs traditional face-to-face interaction. MIT have commented that they can only teach a fraction of those who would like to study at the university, and the course allows them to reach a much larger number of students.

Courses in other subjects such as maths and biology are to be introduced subsequently.

A spokesman for Oxford University commented that Oxford’s own e-learning and online provision is ‘certainly among the most forward-looking in the UK in terms of open educational offerings.’

‘It is worth noting first and foremost that undergraduate courses at Oxford cannot be replicated or replaced by open educational offerings such as iTunes U because at Oxford teaching is focused on the tutorial where one or two students meet a tutor to discuss subjects in depth.’

More than 500,000 lectures are available for free download on the iTunesU Service. Oxford currently has more content on service than any other UK university, and has the number one global chart podcast from the series ‘Building a business.’ Oxford’s iTunesU has more than 3,000 published items and more than 100,000 downloads per week, with some tutors having recorded an entire lecture series. The site also features public lectures, talks at Oxford’s annual alumni weekend, interviews with researchers about their work and interviews with our students about their Oxford experience.

University of Oxford’s Open Spires project has harnessed technology to release hundreds of hours of Oxford lectures online to benefit learners and teachers all over the world. Academics are giving away their content as open resources under a creative commons license. This is one of the largest open education projects in the UK and places Oxford alongside MIT, Yale and Berkeley as leading research institutions who make learning materials available for free.

Oxford’s Department for Continuing Education began offering online courses in January 2004, and there are now 58 short online courses available. Courses are repeated each year, meaning 150 courses are provided per year, on average. The courses have attracted 2500 students so far this year (2011 – 12).

The Department gives careful thought to the subjects in which to develop short online courses, ensuring they fit within a coherent and balanced portfolio which offers students choice and variety within the available subject disciplines. The range of courses currently available is weighted towards the Humanities, in which the Department has an established reputation. The provision of Economics, Mathematics, Natural and Environmental Science, Politics and Psychology courses is being expanded, not only in response to student demand in these areas but as academic staff in the wider University wish to extend their scholarship to the medium of online teaching and learning.

Oxford’s new Certificate in Higher Education is equivalent to one year of full-time undergraduate study at first year level. Students can use the credit that they obtain from online coruses to count towards gaining an award from the University. The course is now accepting applications and will begin in autumn of 2012. There are nine subject areas to choose from : Archaeology, Art, History, Architectural History, History, Italian, Literature, Creative Writing, Philosophy, or Spanish.

A ring of writers

0

Group 2012 is an Oxford-wide newly-created endeavour for budding novelists who wish to come together to share the worries and woes that surround putting pen to paper, or submitting book to publisher. The group is open to a writer at any stage of his career: the first-time novelist who is basking in the glow of having just been published; the seasoned author, who can offer handy hints drawn from his own illustrious career writing books; the young student, who has only just decided she wants to try her hand at writing a novel.

The group, comprised of a large number of members of the public, is joined by a panel of published authors. The first meeting, held in the upstairs section of Blackwell’s, involves a round of introductions from the panel and then a discussion as to what exactly the group would like to cover during its meetings. The charming thing about this literary circle is its democratic aspect: content of meetings will not be decided by the panel members organising them, but by the people who will swell their ranks.

The discussion ensues, with a free glass of red wine at everybody’s side. The discussion covers not only the content of future meetings, but also strays into fiery disagreements about the merits (or otherwise) of the dreaded Kindle. During the introductory stage, each member of the panel has already introduced their literary pursuits to the audience gathered before them. Their range of achievements is impressive, and includes a writer of historical fiction, a children’s author and an author who has been driven to self-publish. The varied expertise of the panel means budding authors of all genres should find somebody they can relate to.

The group will meet monthly, and will provide a source of support and advice for those struggling, or thriving, as they pursue their careers as authors. The turnout shows just how many people aspire to become writers; but it serves as a reminder as to how difficult it is to succeed in this competitive world.

London Fashion Week: Danish Wekeel’s ‘Draped Modern Kouroi’

0

Danish Wakeel is a young London based fashion designer who recently launched his forth collection aimed for the fall-winter 2012 season. ‘Draped Modern Kouroi’, his first wearable collection, was created exclusively for men as an echo of the designer’s own metrosexual image and rebellious personality.

An offspring of the industry, Danish fills an aspiring haut-couture niche, aiming his creations to ‘men who are confident enough to look different and ahead of fashion’, men who ‘have an urge to be noticed wherever they go’. The designer’s sense of couture is distinct, his collection fusing high fashion with dark glam and, at the same time, giving a new take on classic designs.

The whole show surrounding the launch event was meant to transpose the audience in a modern Dionysian fairy-tale: red rose petals, feathers, exotic dancers with a slight touch of fetish; a bit tacky if you ask me, but it had the required effect.

The designer ‘s inspiration came from the concept of drapes. Although in current fashion trends drapes are associated with women’s wear, historically they were unisex items, worn by men in the form of togas, kilts or attires. Bearing this idea in mind, Danish produced a collection mainly focused on blazers. He started from the classic shape and gave it wide cuts and asymmetric contours, experimenting with shades, shapes and volumes, which expose plenty of skin and come to embrace those sculpted silhouettes.

The overall monochromatic pallet that Danish used was highlighted here and there with intricate patterns and prints invoking a diverse mixture of artistic leitmotifs. Throughout the collection the eventual chromatic simplicity of particular items was countered with textural details in pieces such as a pair of trousers with embroidered glass beads or, my favorite, a black blazer with black feathers details sewed in the material.

When not blinking your eyes away, the trousers were just supporting other items of the collection. The general cut was an interesting reinterpretation of classic British tailoring details, which was strongly influenced by Ottoman shalwars, wide at the top and skin-tight on the ankle.

Danish did occasionally break the male exclusivity of the collection and introduced a few dresses: a humble study of straight cuts, low backs, frilly details and feminine figures in general.

Although it feels slightly out of the space and time of current mainstream fashion, the collection will definitely find its way to the wardrobes of many extravagant fashionistas.

Worcester ease into Cuppers final again

0

In looking to reach the final and attempt to retain their title from last year, Worcester fielded a starting line-up that suggested the strength of squad which Lincoln were up against. Ten of the eleven Worcester players had featured on the University football scene, and while Lincoln couldn’t match those statistics on paper, the start of the match was a tense affair with a lack of quality football providing some equality between the teams. The game had added impetus as two years ago these sides had met in the Cuppers semi-final, where a tense penalty shoot-out ending in a Worcester miss led to Lincoln progressing. With this something of a grudge match, the lack of initial crowd for kick-off then was slightly baffling, perhaps due to the amusing European-style early kick-off time, but within ten minutes a solid hundred people had converged on University Parks. This spectator situation was typical of a game where rapid change was the dominating factor; a nervous, battling opening Worcester suddenly scored a salvo of goals from which Lincoln – and everyone watching – never recovered.

Lincoln had already lost one of their best players in Josh Thomas to a recurrent hamstring problem, and although Blue Alex Biggs looked dangerous attacking the full-backs, receiving the ball wide and running around the outside of the Worcester defence, the sudden Worcester goal rout killed off any competitive interest. Blues striker Adam Healy scored two in quick succession, finding himself on the end of Tom Phelan’s lobbed ball to the back post to tap in past the keeper and following up with a strong header in a similar position from a corner. The Worcester spectators celebrated this brace from the Blues striker with a double-performance of their favourite festive chant.

The fact remains, though, that Lincoln suffered heavily during this period due to their poor defence in and around the penalty area from Worcester set-pieces, but the third goal, with Liam Steward-George scoring direct from a corner for the second game in succession, could not be blamed upon that. Worcester centre-back Elliott Thomas then scored a sweetly-struck volley as the ball fell out to the edge of the box, before a Steward-George free-kick forced a Lincoln player to concede an own-goal, headed backwards over his goalkeeper from close range.

All of this carnage occurred within a twenty-minute period of the first half, and when play resumed after half-time the standard of football remained scrappy and frustrating. For Worcester though, this was a perfectly satisfactory outcome, with Phelan in particular providing a strong (and refreshingly sensible) midfield presence. Lincoln had a few chances, with an unmarked header going over the bar, but their several speculative efforts failed to trouble the Worcester goalkeeper. The Worcester captain made several substitutions, with one eye perhaps on their imminent run of games and the form finally developing in the league. The fresh energy levels made it more difficult for Lincoln to attempt a purple patch akin to Worcester’s in the first half, and the game finished with the scoreline an emphatic 5-0.

Asked about the game, Worcester winger Steward-George commented that ‘we came into the game wanting revenge and wanting it done in style’. He expressed excitement at the first floodlit Cuppers final at Iffley this coming Friday evening, and related his plan to ‘love the fans and smash the final’. Take from that what you will, St. Anne’s.

For Lincoln, they will rue a poor period of defensive play spectacularly exploited. Worcester will be confident at Iffley, but with memories of last year’s deadlocked final where they narrowly overcame New College still fresh in the memory, and so too the similarly stagnant second half at University Parks, they will be looking for a performance with more consistent quality. Or simply another quick five.

The MGA marches on

0

A scrappy and controversial game at the Uni Parks last Friday saw St Anne’s reach the final of Cuppers for only the second time in their history.

Their resolute display against Teddy Hall – which saw them emerge victorious from a penalty shootout after 120 goalless minutes – was marred by a horrific injury to influential central midfielder Callum Vibert however, who suffered a broken leg from a wild Hall tackle in the second half.

The M.G.A, in the eyes of Teddy Hall at least, entered the game as underdogs given their place in college football’s third tier compared to Hall’s Premier League status. Perhaps this actually helped Anne’s, who nullified the threat of Teddy Hall, Blues and all, throughout the first 45 minutes of the tie.

After pointlessly heated email exchanges over the rescheduling of the fixture and some critical comments in sections of the student media, this game had added spice, particularly given the vocal support for both teams, who were supported on the touchline by a giant novelty teddy and beaver respectively.

This passion took a sad turn midway through the second half though, as a wild (though not malicious) tackle ended Vibert’s season, but produced just a yellow card from the referee to the dismay of the men in Mint Green. It was a tackle worthy of a red in even the most brutal Sunday League game, and the ref, perhaps regretting this decision, later sent off the offending player after he petulantly kicked the ball away.

Justice had been served, you could say, and with Teddy Hall legs tiring Anne’s were ascendant. They could not find the creative spark to unlock the Hall defence, marshalled by Blue Anthony Beddows though, and were restricted to long range efforts and the dangerous set pieces of Xavier Navas. The game drifted on through extra-time.

And so came the inevitable penalties. Anne’s keeper Nick Gardner stepped up to smash home the first attempt, before performing his best Bruce Grobbelaar impersonation to psyche out the Hall takers. The first five penalties were buried before a weak Teddy Hall effort was saved.

Two penalties later Blues centre back Robert Price stepped up to take the potential winner. Normally a centre back of experience and finesse, the pressure of the occasion showed as his effort was kept out.

One more Anne’s miss and suddenly it was Teddy Hall with a chance to win it, but their player missed the target, as did their next taker as the pendulum swung back in Anne’s favour. It was a harsh ending for Hall who played their part in a tight game, but that this will not matter to the M.G.A who gleefully partook in a pitch invasion after the decisive penalty was missed.

It was the beaver and not the teddy bear that was left smiling in the end. Anne’s, in the words of Gardner ‘took the three points’ and will look forward to the final, where a victory would vindicate the sacrifice made by Vibert during this game.