Thursday, May 1, 2025
Blog Page 1720

Review: On the Line

0

There is very little of merit in Oxford IPlayer’s production of On the Line, a new political satire about a Muslim MP embroiled in controversy over plans for the laying of a new railway line through Slough’s local mosque. For a start the play is showing at the Wadham Moser, which, as we all know, is just a glorified badminton court. The writing, when it is funny (which is nothing more than a smirk) relies on stereotype. The Imam, played by Ibrahim Khan, provides most of these comic moments, and his strength of characterisation gives a welcome relief to the abysmal crowd acting and those characters who have been directed to, or just do for whatever reason, shout all of the time, not least Frank, played by Khushall Ved. The acting thus offers little nuance or originality, although there is a glimmer of hope in Miles Lawrence, playing Walter. It is just a shame that he is given such a drab part- not that any other role would howevever have showcased his talent any better. Indeed, I often get the feeling that the actors are just playing older versions of (or just) themselves. 

Scene changes are clumsy, and take far too long, with actors even tripping over the items of set in the dark. Lighting cues are not known, even when it is just a case of lighting one side of the stage, and then the other, and the set, which is just office junk, cheapens the whole performance. Moreover, lines are often fluffed, cues missed and attempts within the script to be profound and meaningful, such as the final line of “Politics. Fucking politics’ or something to that affect, just fall flat. In all, the performance just smacks of amateurishness. I hope things like this will improve over the run, indeed, I was told before the show that the performance had been made leaner after a bad preview (didn’t fill me with confidence it has to be said). Although it is true that the performance now romps along well enough, I am afraid more work still needs to be done to really fill this play’s potential.

 

2 stars  

Messiah Man: Preview

Preview

While scores of scholars clashed in the battle between religion and science, God entrusted one man with a solution to combine the two and bring peace on earth. That man was John Murray Spear. 

Inspired by the true story of this extraordinary 19th century character, two highly animated writers, Matt Fuller and Adam Lebovits, have issued forth a creation that simply needed to be born.

With all the voyeuristic appeal of biography, and all the ironic idealism of a perfectly gauged university production, Messiah Man brings us a tale of obsessive faith, of self-aggrandizing naïveté couched in hyper-innocent charm.

Ben Cohen is emotive and compelling in the role of John. Not leading so much as being led by the play, John is a sympathetic, charismatic soul. In one of multiple layered oppositions in the performance, he evokes the smiling clown, the essential tragedy of the comic character.

Intentional anachronism emphasizes the timelessness of the story, while twisted realism draws out questions of faith, humanity, love, and sanity.

The conviction of the acting enhances the earnest exploration of this well-crafted play, and the writers’ vision shines through in each scene. Performing in the round foregrounds the audience’s role in this fitting homage to a singular figure, following John through a handful of pivotal experiences not too outlandish for fiction.

Come take on your role with the enthusiastic and cohesive cast, in the Burton Taylor Studio, Tuesday-Saturday of 4th week at 9:30pm. Tickets are £6 / £5 concessions, including a glimpse of the incredible God Machine!  

4 stars

 

The man behind the play…

John Murray Spear paces around his machine. Looking through darkness into the eyes of the expectant crowd, he wipes the sweat from his brow. The pregnant volunteer is in position. The crowd is in position. Placing his hands on the glass cylinders either side of the chair, he looks to the sky. The time is now.

You won’t have heard of John Murray Spear. Don’t worry, until recently, neither had we. A 19th century political activist, and one of the first Americans to advocate the abolition of slavery no less, John began life with his feet firmly on the ground. However, marred by his own incompetence and inability to express himself, John’s activism soon petered out. But what was the alternative for a man with a desperate desire to help humanity but no clear idea how? John soon joined the Church.

But this too was met with failure. Naive and innocent, John wandered the country, challenging the orthodoxies of the day – and being repeatedly beaten up in return. Of course, there are only so many beatings a person can take before they either call time on their career or do something radical, so John had a decision to make.

Stay with us, this is where things get weird. Walking a path paved with the ghosts of geology professors and Benjamin Franklin, violent preachers and three hundred lost orphans, John Murray Spear worked his way towards his ultimate work: the God Machine.

The challenge of staging the life of possibly the sweetest and most bizarre man who ever lived was always going to be huge. His bustling, surreal story bursts at the seams of an hour-long show, and this meant that a severe edit was in order. The sex communes and the invention of the ingenious Duck-Boat sadly had to go, but what was left was even stranger.

To perform this story in a conventional style would require a cast of hundreds and a budget of thousands. We have neither. Therefore, we turned to a more picaresque style, with just five actors playing a huge array of characters, and a manic use of music and lights. John stands in the middle of the production, a not-entirely-stable centre around which the madness spins. When the dust settles, maybe this time people will remember his name.

Matt Fuller and Benjamin Kirby

Review: Curse of the Oxford Revue

0

A quick note before we start: this curse has nothing to do with either myself or the many others who populate this most illustrious section of your favourite free student newspaper. Very few of us dabble in the occult, to the best of my knowledge. Rather, this curse is rather different. Review is spelt differently. This is the Curse of the Oxford Revue.

Specifically, this curse is placed on a small village called Blight-upon-Cripple, a place that is as strange as it is charmingly-named, and it is to this town that intrepid reporter Kirsty Kirstyson is sent, chasing a story about a vole that bears a striking resemblance to Geri Halliwell. Instead, she stumbles across a town that has been living under the shadow of a terrifying curse for the past three decades. Being the intrepid reporter that she is, she decides to investigate. But none of that matters, to be quite frank. This is a sketch show, in the manner of so many flying circuses and pairs of Ronnies. Plot barely figures. Neither does character. The small troupe display a remarkable range, fleshing out a variety of characters, some one-offs and others recurring figures. An early sketch, and a particularly brilliant one at that has the Brazilian president and his advisor celebrating the rebound of their country’s economy based upon the revival of their most vital export, the Brazilian Darkness chocolate. Another is a song on the subject of the Viking funeral, a truly spectacular piece of verbal acrobatics. You get the idea.

Whilst some sketches are nothing short of genius, however, some fall flat. This is hardly the fault of the cast, who remain polished and professional throughout. One can hardly criticise their sense of timing, or their self-confidence: the troupe act with bombast and poise regardless of the quality of their material. You’ll notice that I refer to the actors here in the plural: it is very hard to pick a stand-out performer, or one who is significantly less talented than the others. Rather, it is the writing that tends to fall flat. The sketches take a Python-esque aspect, hinging around the sheer mass of non-sequitur and sheer inanity that characterises, say, And Now for Something Completely Different. Sometimes, this works spectacularly. Take, for example, the song about Viking funerals that I mentioned earlier: wonderfully, gleefully silly. A sketch depicting two couples playing a game of something called Beaver-ball that involved verbal abuse and interpretive dance had the audience, myself included, in paroxysms of laughter and sheer bafflement, and was arguably the high point of the proceedings. Others, though, less good. Talking about these is slightly harder: they’re just not memorable. It’s not that they were dreadful. The comedy wasn’t dissimilar, the acting was still excellent. They just weren’t as funny.

And this is what makes summing up this review very difficult. Whilst the Curse of the Oxford Revue did contain sketches of sheer, comic genius, acted out by some undoubtedly fine comedians, it also contained moments which just fell flat. In a traditional play, this kind of inconsistency would prove fatal, but the Curse of the Oxford Revue is not such a play; rather, it is a sketch show. Should it be judged by the same standards as a play, as the same sort of unified whole? More crucially, however, should a sketch show be so uneven as to inspire my pedantic musing in search of some form of critical justification one way or the other? Probably not.

3 stars

Interview: Messiah Man

Messiah Man opens at the Burton Taylor Studio on Tuesday 7th of February at 21:30 and runs until Saturday 11th. Tickets are £5 for students and can be bought online at www.oxfordplayhouse.com/bt

Harry Potter sorting ceremony to take place in Oxford

0
Oxford’s own start-of-year Sorting Ceremony will take place this week, a term later than expected.
 
The event, organised by the newly formed Harry Potter Society, will see the Sorting Hat delve deep
into students’ minds and place them in Gryffindor, Ravenclaw, Hufflepuff or Slytherin.
 
A formal invitation, sent to all society members, urged them to “take the Hogwarts Express to Harris
Manchester College” and “get to know some fellow Harry Potter fans over a butterbeer”.
 
It also specified a number of questions which students must answer in advance, and which form the
basis of the hat’s decision. These include scenarios like “A Muggle confronts you and says that they
are sure you are a witch or wizard”  and “A very strong man approaches you while you’re eating
lunch and demands that you give him some food. He doesn’t appear to be starving or poor. There is
nobody there to stop him from taking it.” In each case students must choose from a selection of four
responses.
 
Stevie Finegan, one of the society’s “Mugwumps” (Vice-Presidents) explained the need for such a
system, revealing that the Hat has lost many of its magical powers since it sorted Harry and friends.
She said, “Unfortunately its magical element is proving far less cooperative than we would have
hoped. As such we are having to prod it along and help it with song writing.”
 
Finegan promised that the house system will feature in future society meetings, telling Cherwell, “We
do have some events coming up in the future where houses will compete against one another,
including everyone’s favourite, some inter-house Quidditch – so once you’re sorted into your house,
I’d try and suss out who among your number is good with a broom!”
 
She also stressed the importance of school unity, saying, “Once everyone is sorted on Thursday they
will instantly find themselves having to partner up with a student from each of the other houses, in
order to compete in our Three Broomsticks Quiz and win some fantastic prizes.”
 
One student suggested a possible reason for the Sorting Hat’s deterioration in magical ability,
pointing out that “the hat was blown up in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, when
Voldemort sacked Hogwarts.”
 
Meanwhile Imogen Jones, a third-year Classicist at Corpus Christi College, feared that the hat might
entrench élitism at Oxford, claiming, “I’ve heard state school students are twice as likely to be
sorted into Hufflepuff as their privately educated counterparts.”
 
The event will take place at Harris Manchester College at 7.30pm on Thursday 2nd February.

Oxford’s own start of year Sorting Ceremony will take place this week – a term later than expected. 

The event, organised by the newly formed Harry Potter Society, will see the Sorting Hat delve deep into students’ minds and place them in Gryffindor, Ravenclaw, Hufflepuff or Slytherin. 

A formal invitation, sent to all society members, urged them to “take the Hogwarts Express to Harris Manchester College” and “get to know some fellow Harry Potter fans over a butterbeer”. 

It also specified a number of questions which students must answer in advance, and which form the basis of the hat’s decision. These include scenarios like “A Muggle confronts you and says that they are sure you are a witch or wizard”  and “A very strong man approaches you while you’re eating lunch and demands that you give him some food. He doesn’t appear to be starving or poor. There is nobody there to stop him from taking it.” In each case students must choose from a selection of four responses. 

Stevie Finegan, one of the society’s “Mugwumps” (Vice-Presidents) explained the need for such a system, revealing that the hat has lost many of its magical powers since it sorted Harry and friends. She said, “Unfortunately its magical element is proving far less cooperative than we would have hoped. As such we are having to prod it along and help it with song writing.” 

Finegan promised that the house system will feature in future society meetings, telling Cherwell, “We do have some events coming up in the future where houses will compete against one another,including everyone’s favourite, some inter-house Quidditch – so once you’re sorted into your house, I’d try and suss out who among your number is good with a broom!” 

She also stressed the importance of school unity, saying, “Once everyone is sorted on Thursday they will instantly find themselves having to partner up with a student from each of the other houses, in order to compete in our Three Broomsticks Quiz and win some fantastic prizes.” 

One student suggested a possible reason for the Sorting Hat’s deterioration in magical ability, pointing out that “the hat was blown up in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, when Voldemort sacked Hogwarts.” 

Meanwhile Imogen Jones, a third-year classicist at Corpus Christi College, feared that the hat might entrench élitism at Oxford, claiming, “I’ve heard state school students are twice as likely to be sorted into Hufflepuff as their privately educated counterparts.” 

Clare Franklin, a second year mathematician and long-standing Potter aficionado, commented, ‘The sorting ceremony is a rite of passage, and will no doubt be the most important trial any of us face this term. As you would no doubt guess, I would rather suffer through one of Umbridge’s detentions than be in Hufflepuff, and being a Muggleborn, I’d be scared for my safety in Slytherin. But I could be quite at home in Gryffindor or Ravenclaw.’

The event will take place at Harris Manchester College at 7.30pm on Thursday 2nd February.

What a Wit

0

Wit is being performed at the Burton Taylor Studio in 4th week from Tuesday 7th February to Saturday 11th February. Tickets are available online at http://www.oxfordplayhouse.com/btsstudent/

Mario Balotelli spotted queueing up for hall

0

With the end of the January transfer window looming ahead, it has been announced that many Oxford collegiate sportsmen are expected to sign for ‘endless hours of hard work, solitude and despondency’ in a spate of last minute deals.

Oil rich Qatari side ‘Al-dissertation’ are predicted to lead the chase, targeting ‘tired and jaded yet experienced’ finalists in a flurry of big money transfers. Conservative Russian club ‘Last-minute-revision-plansky Moscow’ are prepared to hold back the cheque book until the 5th week of Trinity, in the hope of signing ‘marooned and helpless freshers’ on the cheap. News has also come in that for the umpteenth year running JCR football 3rd division basement club Univ are still in search of anyone with anything that could be interpreted as talent, allegedly targeting ‘all living organisms with at least one leg and a pulse’.

The sudden flurry of transfer rumours are thought to be the knock-on effect of a Michaelmas term jam-packed with fixtures and crew dates for many students. As one second year put quite bluntly, ‘Many of us have suddenly realised that we should probably spend some time doing our degree.’

Lots of people from around the University have kindly tweeted and texted in with information on the whereabouts of potential transfer targets. Jenny from room 201 said that she saw a Lincoln first team player ‘sneaking back from Teddy Hall at 4am’, yet it is unlikely that this has anything to do with football as the player is clearly cup-tied. Another announced, ‘£2million transfer of medic Saras Mane ironically cancelled due to failed medical. Lol!’

Claims have indeed been as farfetched as one student’s text: ‘Just seen someone dressed in full rugby stash making revision notes in the Bodleian library xoxo’. MarkHannay’s tweeted: ‘OMG just seen Mario Balotelli queuing up for hall at Exeter College!!!’, although he did later admit that his statement was about as farcical as one of Steve Kean’s post-match interviews, and he merely wanted to get his name into the paper. Cherwell cannot confirm or deny the validity of either of these assertions.

Several coaches have also expressed their concern that many of their star players with contracts expiring in the summer were expected to be swept away by big money contracts in the financial sector, admitting that, ‘If they only stayed on for DPhils our MCR team might stand a chance of actually fielding eleven players for a match.’

One such sell-out retorted, ‘I’ve joined this club because I really want to make a difference to my field and feel that the club matches my ambition. It’s got absolutely nothing to do with the fact that I’ll own my house before you’ve even paid off your student loan, and will most probably retire to a dream life of fast cars, glamour models and luxurious cruises by the time I’m 40.’

Our transfer dealings conclude with the story that one player, whilst on trial at high-flying Worcester, allegedly rejected their offer of a three year contract, professing that the 1st team ‘didn’t have enough Blues players and simply wasn’t good enough’. However it has since been revealed that he’d completely ballsed up the trialling process and was in fact about as good as football as Andy Carroll’s grandmother.

Review: The Asteroids Galaxy Tour – Out of Frequency

0

Were it not for the weekly reminders in the NME, I might have thought that everywhere east of Glasgow was capable only of either trotting out Scandidisco remixes of our wonderful Anglo-Saxon music, or donning cardigans and burbling their own winsome, yet unmarketable, folk songs. Denmark’s The Asteroids Galaxy Tour are every bit the aesthetic fulfillment of such a preconception. The tone of surprise and expectation of intrinsic national “quirkiness” that colours every piece of writing about a genuinely good album produced by a band that happens to hail from Denmark, Sweden or Norway is nothing more or less than a prejudice, a kind of unconscious cultural condescension. Funnily enough, like most other peoples of the globe, Scandinavians are actually capable of making some really great music – and the Asteroids Galaxy Tour are no exception.

The album really isn’t bad at all. The retro-revival brass section trend (that Mark Ronson has been forced to shoulder the responsibility for) is certainly present, and used correctly for once. This is no Lily Allen parody of a sound that deserves to be taken seriously, but a genuine and enthusiastic stylistic choice. Regrettably, that choice is occasionally ignored in favour of a diluted semi-synthpop (as heard on ‘Heart Attack’ and the title track), that never quite tears itself away from the ‘nu-soul’ rhythms to which the brass section was so ideally suited.

It is music that you will have heard before. Almost every song on Out of Frequency sounds like a cousin of ‘The Golden Age’, the breakout single that made the band’s name and soundtracked that Heineken advert. Some would use this apparent lack of imagination as a stick with which to beat the album. However, I feel that the Asteroids Galaxy Tour are best when they stick to their guns. This is not ‘ideas’ music; it’s a bit of fun. It’s something to put on when you need cheering up, or a little mindless bounce in your step. Sure, the lyrics are meaningless; every song feels the same; Lindberg’s voice can get a big grating – but this music makes me want to dance. They’ve found a formula that works – a danceable beat, a hint of the futuristic, horns and trumpets, a yelp or two from frontwoman Mette Lindberg, and it’s good as gold.

3.5/5 (or four at a push)

For love of the Lords

0

The Lords are undemocratic, unaccountable and, thankfully, useless; an anachronistic relic that should be relegated to history. Or so the well-worn argument runs. Yet the Lords have been proving every naysayer wrong over the last couple of weeks in doing exactly what any self-respecting parliament should do – holding the government to account.

Now I would like to see a democratic Lords as much as anyone, but I have, to my surprise, found myself momentarily thanking the gods of democracy for passing Britain by, and giving us the current crop of peers who are pointing out the obvious pitfalls in the government’s ham-handed attempt at welfare reform.

The Lords have enacted six defeats to the government’s flagship welfare bill, including rejecting the proposal that single parents should be charged to use the Child Support Agency – charged for help to get money from the other parent that their child is entitled to. They also supported an amendment that would exempt child benefit from the £26,000 benefit cap. While £26,000 sounds like a substantial amount of money (and is for most – it is equal to a salary of £35,000 after tax) it could leave families surviving on just £100 a week after housing benefit pays the rent on a flat or house in the South East.

Now I am not against welfare reform in principle – the system costs over £200 billion a year, and has indeed meant that some people can afford to stay permanently out of work. The proposed benefit cap is also wildly popular, with even 69% of Labour supporters in favour of it. However, most people on benefits are not the “scroungers” the Daily Mail loves to harangue – the rising number of people claiming benefits are mostly the swelling ranks of the unemployed. And even columnists on the Daily Mail could not bring themselves to support slashing 20% off the budget for disabled benefits. Welfare reform was always going to be a messy business, but with unemployment a persistent problem as the economy still stutters, it needs handling with more care than ever.

And this is where the Lords have been proving their worth, by picking apart the welfare bill, and forcing the government to think twice about the true effects of what it is proposing. This is far more than MPs have been doing lately – in stumbling efforts to prove their economic mettle, Labour have been falling over themselves to support the coalitions’ cuts and the benefit cap (although shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Liam Byrne did write to Nick Clegg proposing regional variations in the cap).

Now, regardless on where you stand on the coalition’s policies, any good democracy should have a parliament that actually scrutinises legislation and government policy. This is something in which the UK has always been sorely lacking, in no small part due to the toothless status of the Lords. However, the actions of the Lords in the past couple of weeks has provided a taster of what actual scrutiny could really be like (and yes, I for one, am happy to put up with a bit of deadlock in return for some actual accountability).

Work and Pensions Secretary, Iain Duncan-Smith, has, unsurprisingly, insisted that the government will overturn all six defeats inflicted on the welfare bill by the Lords (though he has mooted that other concessions may be introduced before the vote in the Commons on Wednesday). This will comfort those who balk at the obvious democratic deficit in the upper chamber. The amendment to exclude child benefit from the cap, for example, was put forward by the Bishop of Ripon and Leeds, with the strong support of all 26 spiritual peers. While the amendment itself was welcome, the intervention of bishops in a country where regular church attendance is less than 7% served to remind everyone of the blatantly unrepresentative make up of our second chamber.

This is why we need an elected Lords. Creating an elected second chamber that still retains the expertise and relative impartiality of the current House of Lords would be no easy task (though what qualifies Lord Alan Sugar to vote on heath reform is beyond me). If, however, we had a democratic upper chamber, governments could no longer afford to ignore parliament. Then, we might really have an accountable government on our hands.