Saturday, May 3, 2025
Blog Page 1769

Cherwell Sport tries out Ultimate Frisbee

0

Oxford University Ultimate is a tempting and optimistic name for a sport. The loss of the additional word ‘Frisbee’ due to its trademarked status was a monumental setback but the game has remained unchanged.

From its invention in 1968 by American high school student Joel Silver, Ultimate has progressed rapidly. It is played by five million in the US and is now played at over 60 universities across the UK. These are fairly impressive statistics for a game I had never heard of it before coming to Oxford, so I decided to give it a try.

As I entered Iffley sports hall, I observed rows of players simply throwing unbranded discs (Frisbee is trademarked remember) back and forth to one another. Simple. My initial confidence was undermined on closer inspection as I realised that the forehand and backhand throws were done with the sort of speed and control of trajectory that was far superior to anything I could manage.

Last year’s president of Oxford University Ultimate, Phil Garner, explained everything for me. Ultimate can be played both indoors and outdoors, there are men’s, women’s and mixed teams and, although there is no formal BUCS league, the teams regularly attend tournaments all over the country which are practice for regional competitions. Success at regional level wins teams the privilege of competing in the Nationals. Inevitably, the year culminates in a Varsity contest, in which Oxford have triumphed for the last two years, for which players can claim a half-blue.

The game is a combination of netball, basketball and American football; you must be stationary when you have disc, you can only hold on to it for 10 seconds, it is non contact and the object of the game is to score a point by catching the disc when you are inside the ‘end zone’.

This makes for a high tempo and intense game, something which American football could take a lesson from Even though it is only 7-a-side, it is played on a pitched roughly similar in size to a soccer pitch with two 18m long ‘end zones’. The seven players are arranged into a formation which consists of two defensive ‘handlers’ who act like quarterbacks, and the remaining five ‘cutters’ constantly make runs to create space and receive the disc. There are three ways you can win back possession from the opposition; by intercepting, a handling error or simply swatting the disc from the air.

One of the more unusual features of Ultimate is that the entire game is self refereed. Whereas anarchy would ensue in most other sporting activities, this is not the case due to the strong ‘spirit of the game’ held by Ultimate. By having no referees honesty, sportsmanship and respect are promoted – qualities which seem have taken an undeserved holiday from most professional sports.

At most Ultimate tournaments, teams are asked to fill in a form where they review their opponents based on the integrity of their calls, fouls and the general spirit in which they played. At the end of the competition an award is given to the team with best score. Maybe UEFA could try something similar for the Europa League.

In case Ultimate isn’t a hyperbolic enough title for you, there are several pretty impressive videos on YouTube, one in particular displaying a move as ‘The Greatest’. It really has to be seen to be believed.

Overall, Ultimate has plenty of advantages, it’s less stop-start than American football and it’s more athletic than netball, so it’s not surprising that it has made the Physical Education curriculum in some areas of the US. If you’re struggling for a sport to play and have a penchant for unbranded discs, this could be the one for you.

If you’re interested in playing Ultimate please contact the captain Sam Vile ([email protected]) or Phil Garner ([email protected])

Dark days ahead for MUFC

0

United were a mess on Sunday for several reasons but their defence, supposedly one of the best in the league, should shoulder a good chunk of the blame. Fergie’s back four has become little more than mediocre.

Rio Ferdinand looks to have completely lost it, and Patrice Evra may well be heading the same way. Jonny Evans remains the Titus Shambles of Manchester while David de Gea looks like to be taking lessons from the Gospel According to Heurelho Gomes.

What about Fergie’s new fledglings? Phil Jones and Chris Smalling are both undeniably talented, but can two players who learnt their trade at Blackburn and Maidstone United really be expected to fill the shoes of Gary Neville and co. so quickly?

Then you’ve got the Reds midfield. Ashley Young and Nani look good on the wings, but United lack serious quality in the middle. City’s David Silva and Yaya Toure look a different class to Darren Fletcher and Anderson. Ryan Giggs, meanwhile, will soon be the wrong side of sixty, and Tom Cleverley – whatever the Old Trafford faithful may tell you – just is not Paul Scholes.

Finally, the attack. Wayne Rooney is his team’s best player, but he still looks susceptible to sudden dips in form and off-field distractions. It’s the issue of who to partner him with that seems to be giving Ferguson a headache, although there’s no reason why it should. Javier Hernandez is the club’s best buy for a long time and should be playing every game for which he’s fit. Danny Welbeck, for all there is to be said about playing home-grown talent, isn’t as good.

Compare United’s assortment of ex-Wigan stars to City’s team of galacticos, and it’s perhaps easier to see why the Reds lost they way they did at the weekend. There are  gaps in quality in most areas of the pitch: Hart beats de Gea, Kompany beats Evans, Silva beats Fletcher, Aguero beats Welbeck.

Roberto Mancini’s reluctance to take advantage of his team’s unrivalled attacking ability last season was probably why they didn’t win more than just the FA Cup, but this season the Italian has finally taken the hint. City are now the force they should have been a while ago.

Of course history tells us that Alex Ferguson is capable of winning silverware however bad his team is. It was a minor miracle that United won the league last season. But I will eat my mortarboard if they win another title this season – and don’t worry, they won’t.

Director’s Blog – Noughts and Crosses Week Four

0

Rehearsals have begun but at the end of this week, I realise I need to crack on a bit harder with them: with fifty scenes to get through and only three full weeks left in which to rehearse them, the pressure is definitely on. However, I have been surprised at the speed at which the actors have gotten through scenes in rehearsal so far; I’m hoping we’ll continue at that pace without the need to rush through scenes just for the sake of going through them, leading to inadequate work on a scene. 

Rehearsals have begun but at the end of this week, I realise I need to crack on a bit harder with them: with fifty scenes to get through and only three full weeks left in which to rehearse them, the pressure is definitely on. However, I have been surprised at the speed at which the actors have gotten through scenes in rehearsal so far; I’m hoping we’ll continue at that pace without the need to rush through scenes just for the sake of going through them, leading to inadequate work on a scene. 
Thanks to my great producer, whose activities I can only compare to the Grimm’s fairytale of the Cobbler and the Elves, we’ve pretty much got all the funding we need and in terms of being fully-funded we’re nearly there. After going through what I can only describe as the Dragon’s Den version of OUDS with us pitching the play to the OUDS committee who are sitting behind desks- but with a friendly, helpful vibe instead of a scary, intimidating one- the need to get used to the venue is on my mind. The sooner we get to go in there to block scenes within the actual space, as well as figure out lighting and other technical stuff, the better. I’m looking forward to seeing Dead Funny, the production being performed there this week, as it will be interesting to see how they have made use of the performance space. 
My anxiety over ticket sales has not been alleviated- not even a little bit- as we need to sell a hefty amount of tickets in order to break even. So, where to begin? Facebook, of course: it’s only been a few days since I made the event on Facebook and there’s already a decent amount of people who have signed up to attend the event. I also created a website for the play which is going to have some videos and photos of the production on by the end of this week- well that’s what I’m telling myself anyway- which could entice more people. One of the videos is going to be in the classy style of ‘happy-a-la-slapping’, so just to say now to people that they should not be alarmed and that it’s not actually real- no actors were harmed in the making of this short clip. 

Thanks to my great producer, whose activities I can only compare to the Grimm’s fairytale of the Cobbler and the Elves, we’ve pretty much got all the funding we need and in terms of being fully funded we’re nearly there. After going through what I can only describe as the Dragon’s Den version of OUDS with us pitching the play to the OUDS committee who are sitting behind desks- but with a friendly, helpful vibe instead of a scary, intimidating one, the need to get used to the venue is on my mind. The sooner we get to go in there to block scenes within the actual space, as well as figure out lighting and other technical stuff, the better. I’m looking forward to seeing Dead Funny, the production being performed there this week, as it will be interesting to see how they have made use of the performance space. 

My anxiety over ticket sales has not been alleviated – not even a little bit – as we need to sell a hefty amount of tickets in order to break even. So, where to begin? Facebook, of course: it’s only been a few days since I made the event on Facebook and there’s already a decent amount of people who have signed up to attend the event. I also created a website for the play which is going to have some videos and photos of the production on by the end of this week- well that’s what I’m telling myself anyway- which could entice more people. One of the videos is going to be in the classy style of ‘happy-a-la-slapping’, so just to say now to people that they should not be alarmed and that it’s not actually real – no actors were harmed in the making of this short clip. 

Lax defense costs Oxford in Varsity warm-up

0

This week the Oxford Blues women’s lacrosse team took on Cambridge in their first clash of the new season, having crushed Bath 15-5 in the middle of a hailstorm last week. Last year’s three Oxford-Cambridge fixtures all resulted in victory for the Tabs but this year Oxford seem determined not to let that happen.

“A new season, a new squad. Everyone is beatable, it’s just a case of composure” were the pre-match words of one of the Oxford coaches. Speaking to defender Gabriel Harris, I was told why the squad were especially keen for victory this week, “It’s both the captain and the vice-captain’s birthday today and so we are especially pumped up and ready to go out there and give it our all.”

Following the Swifts’ 24-1 victory over Loughborough minutes earlier, the players took to the field. As the draw was set up and the umpire called for quiet on the sidelines, the tension mounted and the Blues’ most crucial league fixture got underway. After a couple of minutes of settled play at both ends, Oxford’s Emily Sever hit the post and the Cambridge goalie did well to save another Oxford shot.

The deadlock was broken moments later by vice captain Beth Denham, who was assisted by Sabrina Gordon’s meticulously placed feed. Two minutes later, the same duo combined to give Oxford a 2-0 lead, this time with Gordon firing in a shot. The perfect start continued with Gordon’s third, which forced Cambridge to call an early time out.

Cambridge were obviously frustrated by the home side’s strong start, and despite their captain’s angry words, Oxford remained on top after the 3 minute break with Denham finding more gaps in the Cambridge defence with a drive from behind the goal.

It took Cambridge a good 12 minutes to get into the game but even when they did, their first few shots on target were skilfully blocked by the Oxford goalkeeper, Alice Leach. Ellie Walsh gave Cambridge their first goal after about 15 minutes, quickly followed by a second from Allana Livesey. They could have drawn level but again Leach proved unbeatable in goal and Lucy Andrew scored her first of the match to put Oxford 5-2 ahead. Cambridge pulled a goal back just before half time still leaving Oxford three ahead at the break.

Less than a minute after the restart, Denham drove to goal and completed her birthday hat-trick, making it 6-3 and Emily Sever soon found the back of the net to take Oxford to a 7-3 lead. For the second time in the match, Oxford found themselves 4 goals to the good but Cambridge came out much stronger in the second half.

As a result of the end to end play, both teams had to continually sprint the full length of the pitch after shots were saved or possession was lost. Gabriel Harris and Jane Dougherty proved to be a crucial pairing in the Oxford defence, relentlessly recovering the ball and moving it up into the midfield and attack. Cambridge began to settle on the ball much more but still struggled to convert chances.

A well crafted goal by Cambridge’s Laura Plant was arguably the turning point for the away side and suddenly the Tabs found themselves level after a second goal from Allana Livesey and two in quick succession from Daniella Allard.

Oxford called a time out and suspense built up with only ten minutes to go. Cambridge continued to keep possession threateningly close to goal and to Oxford’s despair, Allard scored her third of the match from inside the fan.

As the clock ran down, a tactical battle arose as Cambridge played a possession game, whilst Oxford pushed up on the attack. With two minutes to go, Oxford gained the ball back superbly and seemed likely to score on the break, but it was too little too late and difficult chances were missed by Murphy, Gordon and Andrew. As the whistle blew for full time it was Cambridge who were celebrating the narrow victory of 7-8.

The overwhelming feeling on the sidelines was that after dominating the first half and playing their hearts out in the second, Oxford were unlucky to lose. It was most certainly a game of two halves; Cambridge learnt from their mistakes in the first and went all out in the second.

Perhaps Oxford should have capitalised more on an early lead but it is far easier said than done, especially against a side of Cambridge’s calibre. The home team demonstrated fantastic teamwork and equal play, whereas Cambridge relied more upon the individual talents of a couple of star players.

After the game Laura Plant, a key midfielder for Cambridge, said, “That was definitely the closest match we’ve ever played against Oxford. Varsity is going to be very tough this year.”  If this game is anything to go by, it most certainly will be.

Forever young, I wanna be forever young

0

De Grey’s beard is bigger up close than I imagined. He’s looking down at me, exasperated, his eyes rolling, his head shaking, his wiry auburn beard wiggling a split second slower than the rest of his head. As the chief science officer of the SENS Foundation which concentrates on rejuvenation research, he has caused a storm among the scientific community in the last few years with his controversial claims.

A maverick in the field of gerontology – the study of ageing – De Grey is a man on a mission and he has been increasingly spouting his research across news and media channels for the last 10 years. De Grey’s radical claim that ageing is not inevitable has come under fire from many others cientists in the gerontology establishment who think his headline grabbing research has undermined the less stimulating research into how we age. During his speech, de Grey uses increasingly provocative language and illustrations to hammer home how important he thinks his research is.

While other scientists have come and gone, their theories condemned as crock by the popular media, people have begun to sit up and listen to de Grey. Like the plotline from a dubious science fiction novel, he believes that within our lifetime it will be possible to live to 1000, in fact he believes that within the next ten years it will be common for people to live to 150 years old. He argues that by repairing and maintaining our bodies on a molecular and cellular level as damage appears, we’ll be able to stop the accumulation that leads to progressive diseases like Alzheimer’s and keep our bodies from succumbing to the frailties of old age. Or that’s the theory anyway.

Like everyone else sitting open-mouthed, or with furrowed brow, or frantically jotting down something de Grey was mumbling when he spoke at TEDxOxford (it took a few minutes to adjust to a voice slightly muffled by beard), I was intrigued. Less the living for 1000 years, but the idea of living with a healthy, functioning body, possibly indefinitely, is a tantalising prospect.

Of course eliminating death from old age leaves us with a drastically lower death rate, and as everyone who watched Torchwood recently knows, there’s a few problems with that plan. Without curtailing the birth rate there’ll be a population explosion, but he must get asked about overpopulation quite a lot, right? ‘Just occasionally!’ De Grey replies, frustrated. ‘If the choice is between having fewer children and not getting sick, then that’s a personal choice but we don’t have a right to choose for the future. We have a moral duty to develop these technologies as quickly as possible so that humans of the future can decide how and when to use them. If we don’t do that then we’re condemning the future to a life like ours.’

While De Grey thinks the advancement of regenerative therapies is essential, I don’t think I’m the only person who a little bit apprehensive about the idea of indefinite life. De Grey’s analogy, ‘We don’t have 200 year old cars, not because they can’t last that long, but because cars hadn’t been invented 200 years ago’, did little to comfort me, and more to confuse. Can human beings really cope with the idea?

‘Of course we can damn well cope with the idea! I think most people can cope with the idea of not getting sick or not getting Alzheimer’s disease. You don’t need to think about how long we’ll actually live. It’s about not getting sick. I don’t need to know how long I’ll live, or how long I want to live. It’s like asking, ‘What time do you want to go to the toilet next Sunday?’ It’s a stupid question, and it’s a stupid question because we’ll only have better information on the topic nearer the time. It’s exactly the same with do I want to live to 100, let alone 1000? I’ve got no idea. What I do know is that I want to be able to make that decision when I’m 99 rather than have it progressively taken away from me by my declining health.’

There’s an edge in his resolute determination to rid the world of debilitating diseases. De Grey claims that all humans avoid thinking about death, but his focus is on sickness – underneath the bluster and controversy of his claims, De Grey appears to betray a deepseated fear of illness. His campaign, however, centres on the economic and sociological advantages of these therapies.

‘The big difference between this medicine and the expensive medicine we have today is that the economic benefit of providing this will be enormous. It will pay for itself. It’s incredibly expensive for the NHS to support the old and sick. If we can, as a society, spend a bit of money to stop people from getting that way, they’ll continue being productive and the money spent on medicine will be recouped very quickly and many times over. Even in a tax-averse society like the US it’ll be economically suicidal not to make this available to everybody for free and as soon as possible. There’ll be a tiny, tiny interval between these becoming available to everybody and them becoming economically stable’.

De Grey notes there’s a ‘silly ambivalence’ towards his ideas at the moment, but he is certain that when they’ve proved it can be done, and tests done on mice at the moment are looking positive, there’ll be chaos as everyone clamours to get their hands on the chance to live forever. With the extremely lucrative market in antiageing cosmetics and procedures, de Grey has clearly hit upon a universal concern. No one wants to get old or ill, but what are the real implications of his work? How will we adapt and how will our behaviour change?

‘We’ve already given up on survival of the fittest. We’re living longer right now and we’re stronger than we ever used to be because of modern medicine. I have no clue what it’ll do to society, but the point is that so many other advancements, technological for example, are changing our lifestyle and buying habits. If we invent nuclear fusion so we don’t need fossil fuels anymore then that will increase the number of people we can have on the planet without changing quality of life and it’ll change our interest in conserving energy. There are sociological consequences to all manner of advances and they’re all happening simultaneously. Some of them are happening so much faster than this one is, and at the moment nobody can say the effect something like this will have on our lifestyles, because no one knows.’

Then how do we approach ethics? Can we even use terms like ‘life imprisonment’ anymore? ‘Who gives a damn! Of course things will be different; all ethics and laws are based on reality, on what people see as reasonable, and that’s a consequence of their surroundings. We’ll recalculate those things. Society will adapt. What matters is our duty to the future to develop these technologies’.

Rory and Tim’s Library Larks

0

Produced by Lizzie Greene

Fresher dies of heart failure

First year engineering student Chao Cao, of St Hilda’s College, has died of a sudden heart failure. He was found in the shower on Thursday 27 October.

Known to former schoolmates as Bryan Cao, his Facebook page has since been flooded with friends’ comments. In an email to St Hilda’s students, college Principal Sheila Forbes said that “he was taken to the John Radcliffe Hospital but sadly they were unable to revive him, and he died at 1.30pm.”

College became a sombre place in the aftermath of the news. The chapel was opened for quiet reflection, and the Chaplain led prayers in the SCR at 8.00pm that evening. “If there was any consolation in this tragedy, it was the profound sense of community during the service,” one undergraduate at St Hilda’s told Cherwell.

The Oxford University Chinese Society held their own series of prayer events at the college the next day, Friday 28 October, while a commemoration service was held at St Hilda’s last night, 3 November.

Dr Margaret Kean, Dean of St Hilda’s College commented on the solidarity felt amongst college members following Chao’s death, telling Cherwell, “We are a community united in grief, and one that has shown remarkable dignity and discretion in dealing with the situation.”

JCR President Sarah Finch also expressed feelings of gratitude for what she said was “an admirable reaction among the undergraduate body, proving how close-knit we are as a college.”

A board was set up in the foyer of the Jacqueline du Pré Music Building for Chao’s friends to write tributes, one message saying, “Chao, I’ve only been friends with you for a few weeks now, but I could tell you were going to be one of the best.”

Professor Guy Houlsby, Head of the Engineering Department sent an email to all engineering students yesterday announcing the tragic news. In it he said, “I understand that whilst very rare, such unexpected conditions occur occasionally in young men.” “His family, who are in Shanghai, have been informed of this sad news and will be travelling to Oxford. I am sure staff and students in Engineering Science would join me in extending our sympathy to them and to Chao’s friends at this difficult time.”

St John’s second year Siyi Hao, a fellow engineer who went to sixth form college with Chao, commented, “Chao was a quiet and smart lad. He had always been careful and considerate to his friends, and his humorous character always lightened up everyone around him. Chao struck me as an extremely hard-working person as well when we talked about his preparation for Oxford interviews. He put a great deal of effort in everything he worked on, and the results were always near perfection.

“The tragedy has stunned every one of his friends, and many of them came to pay tribute to him. The length of a life is limited and he had achieved so much during his 20 years. I hope he had no regret when he left, and his parents, sister and girlfriend can go through this tragedy peacefully together.” Those wishing to add their messages to the remembrance board can leave them at the St Hilda’s Porters’ Lodge.

Sudden Death Syndrome is the term used to encompass the many different causes of heart arrhythmias in young people, which can sometimes cause a sudden death. There are 11 major causes of unexpected cardiac death in the young, the leading cause being hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a condition associated with high levels of sports and activities.

About 10,000 British people are known to have HCM, but many more are believed to have the potentially life threatening condition without realising it. Charities such as Cardiac Risk in the Young (CRY) aim to raise awareness of such conditions and to promote “good practice and screening facilities devoted to significantly reduce the frequency of young sudden cardiac death throughout the UK.”

Review: Sandro Perri – Impossible Spaces

0

‘How could I save it for the morning after / some kind of antimatter,’ Sandro Perri softly intones as his latest record draws to a close, his poised, unaffected deliverybestowing a gravity upon what seems in isolation to be a faintly absurd couplet. In fact, Impossible Spaces is an album saturated with‘anti-matter’; the loose compositions that make up the Toronto artist’s second full-length under his own name are anchored by an acute awareness of the importance of negative space in music.

Throughout the album, Perri’s own guitars, analogue synths and modest yet striking tenor are embellished with flourishes of flutes, strings and horns, but nowhere does he allow the ornate arrangements to overflow into gratuitous sentimentality. The wide array of instruments is used instead to colour Perri’s meandering, often elusive, vocal melodies with subtle organic textures and hints of tropicália, giving the music an intangible, breathy quality that is at once both lush and generously spacious. Sandro Perri withholds a lot from his audience. Both emotionally guarded and musically understated, Impossible Spaces can seem vaguely inconsequential when approaching it for the first time but it is in its reserved nature that the album holds its irresistible allure.There is a sense of incompleteness running through Perri’s music – melodies turn unexpectedly, or trail off completely, and moments of catharsis are completely avoided, even when threatened numerous times on the album’s centrepiece ‘Wolfman’ – surrounding the record in an intoxicating air of mystique defying full comprehension.

Impossible Spaces’ existence is a precarious one, its unassuming nature kept from slipping into insipidity only by Perri’s canny appreciation of restraint; the plodding, metronomic percussion and clunky construction of ‘Futureactive Kid (Part 1)’ provides a glimpse of how the album could have turned out had he not performed this balancing act with such dexterity elsewhere. For the most part however, Impossible Spaces is a complex album betraying a sophisticated artistic vision and what initially appears to be a polite, mild-mannered set of mid-paced folk songs slowly unfolds to reveal an endlessly engaging and subtly nuanced work.

Review: Tom Waits – Bad As Me

0

Tom Waits needs no introduction. Now in his fifth decade of making music, the singer-songwriter has made the arc from nightclub-singer maudlin jazz-and blues in his time at Asylum Records,to the instrumentally eclectic synthesisof Swordfishtrombone and Rain Dogs in the early Eighties, the atmospheric skeletal rhythms of Bone Machine (1992), the backwoods blues and gospel of Mule Variations (1999), and ultimately the quasi-industrial Real Gone (2004).

His first studio full-length in seven years, Bad As Me is an astonishing affirmation of his unfailingtalent. Waits doesn’t necessarily tread new ground, but revisits the eclectic styles he has pioneeredin his career: the martial ‘Hell Broke Luce’, for example, with its semi-barking vocals and aggressive multi-instrumental rhythmic thumps, is strongly reminiscent of Rain Dogs.

But Bad As Me never sounds stale.In fact, Waits’ songwriting ability and innovation is once again confirmed: there isn’t a single weak track in the bunch. Moods shifts define the album, which flits from the smoky, melancholy ballad of ‘Talking at the Same Time’ to the swinging and trombone-filled ‘Get Lost’, to the downtrodden tango inflected lament of ‘Pay Me’. On the roaring ‘Satisfied’, meanwhile, Waits howls over the bluesy guitar riffs of Keith Richards (yes, that Keith Richards).

Album single ‘Bad As Me’ is far and away the standout, its echoing drums and baritone sax outshone only by Waits’ hoarse and near hysteric voice. As usual, Waits’ voice completely dominates the record. Able to convey emotion through the slightest of vocal inflections, it is equally captivating from the husky tones of ‘Back in the Crowd’to the smooth falsetto of ‘Get Lost’. The latter sees Waits chastising of irresponsibility (‘Everybody knows umbrellas will cost more in the rain’) while condemning our uneven application of those standards: ‘We bailed out all the millionaires.They’ve got the fruit, we’ve got the rind.’ What rind we have left, though, is worth spending on Bad As Me.