Wednesday, May 7, 2025
Blog Page 1923

The Myth of French Cinema

0

What is it about being French that makes something cool? French bread, French Connection, French kissing. The prefix seems to bring with it an air of sophistication and chic (with the notable exception of French and Saunders). Nowhere is this more true than with French film. Consider the sentence ‘she likes to watch films’. The individual described sounds fairly regular, possibly even a bit dull (I like films probably more than the next man but saying it in conversation can solicit eye rolling and assumption that you just loved Tranformers 2). Now just observe the wonders that ‘French’ can do – ‘she likes to watch French films’. Suddenly our mystery woman has become cultured, interesting, probably the sort to write poetry and hang about in smoky rooms listening to jazz. Its frankly unfair.

It’s not that French film never deserved this title; the Nouvelle Vague earned it in the 50’s and 60’s. The experiments with visual style, the jump cuts, the spirit of backyard film making, without it modern cinema would not be what it is in that there would be no Coppola, Scorsese or Tarantino (who dedicated Reservoir Dogs to director of À bout de soufflé, Jean-Luc Godard – I know… wikipedia can surprise us all). For a while French film was at the cutting edge.

But that time has passed. French film now is nothing to get excited about. Ok that might be a bit far; Amelie was good, so was La Haine, but they weren’t really ground breaking, nor typical of the quality of the vast bulk of French films produced. The big French release you may have heard of this summer was Heartbreaker. It was lazy, predictable and clunky, yet the plot (not startlingly dissimilar to the also terrible 2001 film Heartbreakers with Jennifer Love-Hewitt and Sigourney Weaver) was heralded by the Telegraph as recalling ‘a time in film history when rom-coms were amusing and glamorous as well as romantic’. Time Out London called it ‘instantly amusing’ and ‘hilarious’. I began to think that it might just be me until I saw the faces of the other people leaving the cinema. The smiles were fixed, the comments forced. Everyone was looking nervously at their friends, worried about being the one who didn’t get it. In my case I looked across at my friends. Did they all think that it was god’s gift to cinema?

‘What was that s***?!’

The spell was broken. Nobody had enjoyed it.

It’s not that French film can’t be good, it obviously can. But just the fact that it’s French shouldn’t afford it an air of brilliance.

Review:The Royal Hunt of the Sun

0

God and Gold make a story. And to tell it, The Royal Hunt of the Sun will use so much fabric that it could span twice the length of an Olympic sized swimming pool! Twice. That’s right, enough to drown in. When you read the production notes on the sheer amount of gold glint used to embellish the stage and the 10 months it has taken to make all the intricate head-gear and artefacts, well it is very impressive. We will see the Oxford Playhouse being illuminated by Inca bracelets, bangles, anklets, necklaces, and all numbers of exotic priceless stage dressings. But there’s a nagging feeling that creeps up inside.

Could this entire visual spectacle be an elaborate distraction from the actual acting? It’s hard to tell because there is still so much time left for improvement before the show opens in 3rd week. Peter Shaffer’s play is a romanticised re-telling of the 16th century Spanish expedition led against the Inca civilisation. This play is intended to be grand, with an epic musical score and stylised dialogue to capture the audience’s imagination. Unfortunately, the acting seemed to fall short of the hype aroused by its production team – not across the entire cast– but in the two main characters of Francisco Pizarro and the King of the Incas Atahuallpa.

The problem may have been the high level of intensity that Jacob Taee’s Pizarro had to maintain throughout the play. When this somewhat larger-than-life character is being wracked with doubt about his Christian faith, the acting came off as petulant ranting. When Pizarro was being heroic striving to defend his new friend, the King of the Incas, there was an absence of playable emotion and instead, quite a lot of shouting. When the King of the Incas himself, played by Joe Robertson, clapped together his palms and spoke with the tongue of a god, the effect was disappointing, lacking the regal flourish and confidence required to make such a moment work. Not a flop but altogether unpersuasive, these great men weren’t as we wanted them to be, and if there was any humour or affection between them then it was drowned out by the hum of pan-pipes, the fluttering of fabric and the gleam of the gold leaf.

What held the principal players together in this large cast of over 20 actors, were the Cassie Barraclough and Marcel Miller’s Incan generals. With towering stilts that allowed them to bound across the stage and thundering voices, they pierce through gabble of quarrelling Spanish ministers and make their onstage presence mysterious and powerful. And Alfie Enoch’s De Soto was able to bring the impassioned speech and valour that playing a Spanish conquistador demands. The other Spanish soldiers kept the pace exciting, whilst the omnipotent narration given by Jonathan Webb (playing his older-self long after the expedition had taken place) is a good dramatic device that keeps the audience engaged with the nicely choreographed scenes taking place on stage.

The play is definitely unique and an ambitious task for a student budget. If this potentially strong cast can through the teething problems of making somewhat two-dimensional characters come to life in a satisfying way, then this production of Royal Hunt promises to be astounding and mesmerising.

Archeology digs at Roman sites

0

A new project has been launched this week to explore East Oxford’s Roman and medieval archaeological sites.

Led by the University’s Department for Continuing Education, the project has been made possible by a £330,000 grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund.

Academics on the project will spend the next three years working with Oxford residents on digs, excavations, and surveys at sites believed to include Roman settlements, a medieval leper hospital and Civil War siege works.

The project is the biggest community outreach scheme of its type to be launched by the University.

Vice Chancellor Andrew Hamilton said, “Oxford University spends a lot of time looking out at the world, but we are also totally grounded in the local community.”

“The University is 900 years old, but this will find many things that will go far beyond that period.”

£1 billion fundraiser retires

0

Dame Vivien Duffield is set to retire as the chairman of the Oxford Thinking fundraising campaign, reports the Telegraph.
Since taking up the post in 2008, Dame Duffield is credited with having raised more than £1 billion for the University’s fundraising campaign.

Oxford Thinking, “the biggest fundraising campaign in European history,” has raised £961 million to date, and is aiming to reach £1.25 billion.

Last year, the University’s endowment stood at £585 million, with combined college endowments reaching £2.4 billion.
Dame Duffield, a graduate of Lady Margaret Hall, has also contributed £5.1 million of her own money to the campaign and is estimated to have donated £176 million from her various foundations.

Calls for child heart unit closure

0

An NHS review announced last Friday that paediatric heart surgery should no longer take place at Oxford’s John Radcliffe hospital.
The review aims to reduce the number of specialist centres in Britain. Out of the eleven centres inspected, the John Radcliffe received the lowest ranking assessment by a “significant margin”.

Parents of children who have undergone surgery at the unit have expressed their outrage at the NHS decision and have launched a campaign to save the service.

Heart operations were suspended at the hospital earlier this year following the deaths of four infants at the surgery unit. The surgeon Caner Salih has since been found by an independent investigation to have made no errors in judgement.

Students assaulted in brutal beatings

0

Fears about student safety have been raised this week following three violent assaults in central Oxford.

These latest attacks follow two stabbings Cowley last week.
Third year student Laurence Osborn was robbed by a group of five men on Parks Road, opposite Keble college, leaving him with severe head injuries.

“I was walking into the centre of town for a friend’s birthday when I saw a group of guys on bikes and a moped coming towards me on the pavement rather than the road. I didn’t think for a moment that I was a target because I was so close to town.”

The group pushed Osborn against a wall and threatened physical violence unless he handed over his phone. Osborn complied but the attackers decided the phone wasn’t valuable enough to steal and broke it instead.

After punching him, the group began to move away. However, when Osborn stayed to attempt to retrieve his glasses from the ground, the attackers threw a bottle at him and forced Osborn to run in the direction of The King’s Arms.

Despite his injuries, Osborn commented, “It’s more psychologically wounding than physically wounding. I’ve been having flashbacks, but I’m alright. I’m not going to let it affect the academic year and my tutors have been supportive.”

The attack left Osborn with a broken nose and fractured cheek. He was admitted to A&E because of blood clots and worries that the compound breakage of bone as well as cartilage in the nose was consistent with skull fracture.

Although the attack occurred at nine o’clock at night, no passers-by witnessed the incident, and Osborn’s attackers made off with his passport, bank cards and keys. The student was forced to remove any valuables from his college room and sleep elsewhere until the lock was changed.

A second student, Ian Maconnachie, was assaulted on his way home from Park End last Wednesday. The attack took place outside O’Neill’s pub on New Inn Hall Street at around 3am.

“My memory of the incident is a bit hazy, but I remember that there were two people I didn’t know having an argument and it got heated. I attempted to intervene and for my trouble I was punched so hard it knocked me out.

“I’ve never been hit before and I was in A&E for six hours that night. I’m quite light-hearted about the whole thing but it was so avoidable.”

The police are still investigating both incidents but there have been no arrests made so far. The rapid spate of attacks since the beginning of term has raised concerns that students are being deliberately targeted.

Osborn agreed that the attack felt like more than a straightforward mugging. He said, “Once they took my things they argued about what they were going to do with me. They decided to hit me anyway even though they’d already robbed me.
“I live in a very rough area of London, and I’ve been mugged before, but I’ve never had an experience as horrible as that. It didn’t seem like they needed to steal. It just seemed like they wanted to hurt me. When I was assaulted before it was a means to an end – they hit me first and then took my wallet. I just got the impression that they hated me.”

A further incident was reported to police on the same evening that Osborn was attacked. A 23-year-old student was admitted to hospital after being hit with a glass bottle at the corner of South Parks Road and St Cross Road. The man was walking with friends when confronted by a larger group of people at around 10.45pm.
The incident is also being treated as grievous bodily harm but no-one has been arrested.

Both Osborn and Maconnachie have praised police assistance. Maconnachie commented, “When I came around the police were already there and somebody had called an ambulance for me.”
Osborn said, “The police have been very helpful. They explained that I’ll be entitled to compensation because it was a case of grievous bodily harm.”

Tom Perry, OUSU Welfare warned that students must not underestimate the dangers of walking alone late at night. He commented, “While Oxford may seem like a quaint place to live, it is a city, and students should be careful.”

Last week, an Oxford Brookes student was stabbed outside the O2 Academy on Cowley Road. A man has now been arrested for the attack.

Benjamin Hepburn, 22, appeared at Oxford Magistrates’ Court last week and will appear at Oxford Crown Court later today. He has been charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent.

£35m quad for St John’s

0

St John’s students, fellows and alumni celebrated the official opening of the college’s new £35 million quadrangle on Saturday.
Kendrew Quadrangle is named after the Noble Prize winner and former St John’s President, Sir John Kendrew. The quad will provide seventy student rooms, a law library, a gym, café, archives, music practice areas and an events room. It is one of the largest building developments undertaken by an Oxford college in recent years.

Taking nearly a decade of planning by the college, the new quad’s design has been praised for its cutting edge approach to energy consumption and sensitivity to local surroundings.
Its innovative technology makes it one of the University’s most environmentally friendly projects to date. Geothermal heat pumps and a wood chip burner mean it has just half the carbon footprint of a conventional design.

Matthew Thomlinson, a second year St John’s student, said, “The law library looks like a really great working atmosphere, it will really help with my learning. I like that its green and eco-friendly.”
A spokesperson for St John’s said, “Kendrew Quadrangle is a first-rate building in a modern idiom that responds sensitively to the unique context of the college and the city. These top class facilities will help us to continue to attract the most able students and academics.”

Current third years at St John’s will be the first ever residents of the quadrangle. Its thirty undergraduate rooms were, according to the college JCR, “snatched up by Finalists” in the annual room ballot.

The extra accommodation space will allow St John’s postgraduates and academics to live in college for the first time.

The new building forms part of a larger project which involved the restoration of older college buildings, including a seventeenth century barn which was converted into a new exhibition and performance space.

MJP Architects, who designed the quad, also created St John’s garden quadrangle, completed in 1994, and the 2004 extension of the Senior Common Room.

Pounding the hacks: £5 charge

0

President’s Drinks at the Oxford Union will start charging members for entry, it was decided at Standing Committee this week.
The proposal, put forward by Union President James Kingston, was passed by seven votes to six at the Committee meeting on Monday evening.

Kingston said that selling tickets on a first come first serve basis would reduce “hack patronage” at an event that has often been the preserve of friends of Union officers and committee members.

President’s Drinks take place every week after the debate on the Thursday and offer members an opportunity to meet guest speakers.

A former member of Standing Committee told Cherwell that previously there had been a clear policy that members on Secretary’s Committee could bring one guest. Those on Standing could bring two, officers could bring “about five” and the President as many they wanted.

The new move will see forty tickets going on sale to Union members at a cost of £5 each, and members will only be allowed to attend two of the events per term.

Although a suggestion was also put forward to charge for attendance of the dinner that precedes the drinks, Kingston said it was “a little ridiculous” that officers who were obliged to attend and entertain the speakers should be charged to do so.
Further modifications to President’s Drinks were also proposed, including turning the Drinks into a smaller event with higher quality alcohol.

However, the Union President maintained that both speakers and members enjoyed the weekly event. Kingston argued against calls to reduce the size of the guest list, reminding the committee that they existed “to serve the members”.

The decision to introduce the £5 charge has been met with mixed reactions from Union members.

One member who attended President’s Drinks regularly last year said he had used the Drinks as a forum “to hack” and stopped going once he had been successful in achieving a committee position.

He agreed that charging people would hopefully attract guests “who actually wanted to meet the speaker”. This, he thought, would be “a lot fairer”.

However, another argued that the “patronage” of the President would still apply since he or she selects who dines with speakers beforehand. Those at the dinner can attend the subsequent President’s Drinks.

He also predicted that the Union would struggle to sell forty tickets for the Drinks each week and that this will lead to Committee members inviting along their friends.

He commented, “It will very much retain a ‘Members’ Club’ atmosphere”.

The ticket charge is set to be introduced in third week. Standing Committee will re-open discussions on the proposals at its next meeting on Monday.

Christian, but not Puritan

0

This article was supposed to be about the tough decisions I had to make as a Christian JCR President in charge of Freshers’ Week. The story was supposed to run something like this: Christian President finds it impossible to run a Freshers’ Week that anyone actually enjoys without compromising his commitment to his faith. The week ends up as a series of agonising decisions about how to reconcile the debauchery going on all around him with his personal convictions. My experience was very, very different. It was hard work – twenty hour days take it out of you after a while – but it didn’t feel like there was some sort of ‘culture war’ going on all week between a Christian President and a hard-drinking, hard-partying fresher intake. You could make the argument that that was because I delegated so much that I effectively washed my hands of that side of the week and left the Entz reps, able as they were, to do what they do best; but given that I was out at the clubs three nights out of four I’m not sure that explanation really stacks up. So why no moral torment?

I think there are a couple of key things which go some way to explaining the lack of conflict. Firstly, I am a Christian but I’m not a Puritan. I don’t think alcohol or dancing or music or sex or fun is inherently corrupting. While I believe that I shouldn’t drink too much and lose control of my actions I still enjoy a pint (although mine’s a cider) or a couple of glasses of wine as much as the next man. And although I have a moral objection with going out to pick up a girl for a one night stand, that won’t stop me from being in Bridge most Thursday nights with the rest of the college rugby guys. So from that perspective I had no moral qualms whatsoever about leading a committee that structured the week’s events to include alcohol and organised club nights because there’s nothing inherently wrong with those things. I did make sure, with the support of an excellent welfare team, that quality alternatives were on offer, but if people chose to use particular events in a way that I view as being harmful – that was their choice…

… Which leads nicely on to the second thing: I don’t think I have a right to dictate the lifestyles of others. I have sincerely held moral beliefs that come from my faith in Jesus, and I try (and fail) to live up to them every day, but no title or position of authority gives me any license to impose them on another autonomous individual. So although I can’t deny that I was pleased to hear from my Entz rep on the first night that people were choosing to drink substantially less than last year (costing the JCR money in the process!), I would never have dreamt of trying to reduce the availability of alcohol overall during the week, because for me that would have represented an abuse of my position, as well as being impossible to get past the committee!
The fact is that I took most stick during the week because of this opposition to values being imposed on others. New is by no means the worst offender when it comes to pushing Oxford’s “lash” culture – there was never any chance of one of our Entz reps telling freshers that they would be socially ostracized by the other years if they failed to go out, as was the case at another college. But I still remembered being told ‘two hands, two drinks’ on the first evening of my Freshers’ Week, and I wanted to make sure that, no one, whoever they were, was able to impose their values on the freshers. This meant, for example, that I made sure the non-alcoholic option was something better than rank orange squash in a paper cup. The sight of a crate of J2Os amongst the Becks’ and VKs that arrived at quarter to eight on the first morning of Freshers’ Week did lead to a few raised eyebrows, but for me it was a small price to pay to give the freshers more of a choice. It was this attitude ( I think) that deemed me worthy, in the eyes of one ingenious third-year at least, of the new title of “Fun Prevention Officer” (or FPO for chanting purposes). That very chant rang round the bar as the first bop of term drew to a close – a rousing send-off at the end of my first week as JCR President! You can’t win them all.

So despite the supposed difficulties, I really enjoyed Freshers’ Week. But I wouldn’t want anyone to get the impression that there weren’t times during the week when the going got tough – seeing a drunk, toga-clad fresher vomit gently onto his sandaled feet as I shepherded him back to college was a definite low – but I certainly saw myself as in a position to help him, rather than judge him or anyone else. And I wouldn’t want anyone to get the impression that I see Christianity as just a lifestyle choice among many. I think it’s the truth. But you’re entitled to assess that for yourself so you can decide what you believe, and my job as President is not to impose my views on others, but to live through them in a way that means I can serve as a successful President during Freshers’ Week and beyond.

I back Browne

0

I must speak honestly when I say that almost every comment on the Browne review from OUSU or the Cherwell has been based upon myths or faulty reasoning. So far, the Review has said nothing of any great consequence, and it is only through the press that this idea of extortionate fees has arisen. However, I am still willing to stand up for these alleged tuition fee hikes, if only because common sense compels me to do so. While it will be Oxoniocentric (my latest inkhorn masterpiece of vocabulary) I do hope it applies to the elite Universities.

Let us get a few basic matters in order. First, tuition fees will not have to be paid up front, allowing students to make use of very generous lending terms in repaying their university debts. Secondly, the Browne review has made clear that bursaries and financial aid must be improved. Third, using ideas of supposed ‘intimidation’ by ‘perceptions’ of Oxford elitism are based upon ridiculously patronising concepts of what students are capable of.

Many complain that students leaving university from less well off families will be in debt, and that regardless of bursaries, high fees will somehow scare of applicants. First, like all things involving money and life, oppurtunity costs must be taken into account. Students will have to decide whether or not they are willing to make a large financial investment in their education and future. Of course, increased funding will mean more oppurtunities for aid, but a portion of the cost must be borne by students. Our parents have had to do the same when buying a house on a mortgage, or taking out a loan from the bank to cover their new business.It is a part of life, and there is no shame in it.

There is, however, that eternal spectre of ‘intimidation’. I hate to be harsh, but if the fear of a bursary application or wealthy colleagues is going to put a student off, I wonder what terrors they will endure during their first tutorial, job interview, or mortgage application. As long as we are willing to look at this issue in its totality, get out of our fantasy world, and realise that this is the only realistic option, we might be able to engage with it and realise that that it isn’t so bad. Of course, as an international student paying full fees, I really want to say ‘chin up and enough of the British whingeing.’
Adi Balachander