Friday, April 25, 2025
Blog Page 1937

The real Serge Gainsbourg?

0

Serge Gainsbourg did nothing to help reverse the French stereotype. He smoke, drank and sleazed heavily, and with an arrogance and aloofness that earned him adoration in his homeland, but alienated most people outside France. His life certainly had its rock-star crises, not least the moment when he told Whitney Houston on live television that he wanted to fuck her (YouTube it). Yet Gainsbourg: Vie Heroïque forgoes the histrionics of the conventional rock biopic: unlike Ray or La Vie en Rose, it doesn’t squeeze every last drop of melodrama out of its subject’s life. First-time director Joann Sfar skirts around the break-ups with Brigitte Bardot (Laetitia Casta) and Jane Birkin (Lucy Gordon), and ends the narrative before the songwriter’s last erratic years of alcoholism. Instead, he preserves the cool and charismatic Gainsbourg (Eric Elmosnino) in a sequence of scenes that show him singing, smoking, drinking and sleazing.

But are we watching the real Gainsbourg? Significantly, Sfar opens the film with his Jewish upbringing in Nazi France. The young Lucien Ginsburg (a strong Kacey Mottet Klein) reacts to the anti-Semitic authorities with characteristic defiance and impudence – he is first in line to collect his star of David badge, whereupon he boasts to the officer that he has a Nazi friend at the art academy; but he is dogged by an awareness of his Jewishness, and the outsider status that it entails. This self-consciousness continues into adulthood, even after Lucien adopts the more stage-friendly name Serge Gainsbourg: in his boldest move, Sfar creates a sinister puppet-like alter ego with exaggerated “Jewish” features, and has it follow the adult Gainsbourg for most of the film. Gainsbourg therefore cannot escape his self-image of the “ugly outcast”, and instead decides to filter it into his rock-star persona (which he names Gainsbarre). We see Gainsbourg irreverently recording a reggae version of “La Marseillaise”, and the controversy that it provokes: the songwriter, though thoroughly French, is keen to remain on the fringes of society.

The clue is in the film’s subtitle: “a fairytale by Joann Sfar”. As he admits (in a quote that appears before the end credits), Sfar is “more interested in Gainsbourg’s lies than his truths”. This affords the former graphic novelist a certain stylistic, as well as narrative, flexibility; hence the alter ego’s features, the animated opening credits, the Moulin Rouge hues. The film is the better for it. But more importantly, the quote betrays Sfar’s real interest: in Gainsbourg as a persona. Gainsbourg the arrogant, aloof star is constantly tested against reality – his Jewish heritage, his ugliness, his general lack of self-confidence – but the persona is only reinforced as the film progresses, until the puppet-like alter ego disappears around forty-five minutes before the end. What’s left behind is a rock star caricature who wears shades indoors and is almost too cool to have sex anymore. A product of Gainsbourg’s lies?

All is not lost – A celebration of alternative music festivals

0

On meeting a self-proclaimed music enthusiast at a concert last week, my effusing about this year’s Glastonbury festival was met with the response ‘all music festivals are crap’. Although admiring his bold conversational technique, I wanted badly to disagree with his sentiment. But sadly, it is not just my new acquaintance who sees the festival season as a time for despair; his attitude is shared by many fans of alternative music genres (by alternative, I’m talking about anything you definitely wouldn’t find in the top 40 on a Sunday evening).

I concede that with the exception of Glastonbury, the major music festivals seem to have jettisoned the free spirited, and new-music promoting ethos that they espoused at their inceptions, favouring instead unethical corporate sponsorship and line-ups wholly saturated by the most vomit-inducing bubble-gum pop, or worse, Pete Doherty centred re-unions.

Perhaps the bitterest of blows came to alternative festival goers earlier in the year when the bastion of electronic music platforms, Glade Festival, (a spin off festival of the Glade district in Glastonbury) announced its 2010 cancellation, citing irrational policing restrictions and unreasonable price-hikes as reasons for the decision. To the despondent, the cancellation of Glade, which was borne out of ‘a love of electronic music, free spiritedness and alternative culture’, represented the death of the real music festival.

But these people are wrong; I propose that the ‘alternative’ festival is an institution more fruitful than ever – one simply has to look in the right places. What’s more, the best of the year’s are still to come this summer. For those who crave the experimental, perhaps the most satisfying event is Birmingham’s Supersonic Festival. Held in the city’s artistic epicenter, The Custard Factory, Supersonic is entering its eighth year this October, and is showcasing a line up of unrivaled gravity in the left-field music scene.

Supersonic Festival utilises converted factory warehouses and art galleries, making it, I think, one of the more interesting settings for a festival in the UK. And it’s not just the venue that makes Supersonic the antithesis of V; the musical line up is decidedly fascinating. It boasts a bunch of names that the average Joe would never had heard of, and granted, some are a little obtuse for my liking, but acts like Peter Broderick and People Like Us are bound to make the event a goer. As a resident of the West Midlands myself, one of the most refreshing things about Supersonic is its facility for breathing life into an ever diminishing alternative music scene within the second city – this, a cause for celebration in itself.

For music that doesn’t spawn from a western tradition, a remarkable event is The African Music Festival in London, which, also in its eighth year, is held at several venues across the city, the principal one being The Festival Hall. The most outstanding feature of this festival is its musical authenticity. The majority of (the few) festivals that don’t neglect non-western music entirely tend to feature just watered-down, westernized acts, that draw only slightly on eastern flavours, and who they present under the ubiquitous, lazy and frankly meaningless ‘world music’ banner. To this, The African Music Festival, whose roster features genuine African musicians playing genuinely African music, is a viable antidote.

So far so good. Perhaps with this selection of musical feasts my festival-hating friend might begin to come round. But for some people, despite the overwhelming musical credibility of the aforementioned events, there is a component missing – the traditional festival spirit: the camping, the parties, the living it rough – the carnival experience.

For many, however good the line up, a music festival isn’t a music festival without such a vibe, and for these people I offer Stop Making Sense festival. Stop Making Sense, for me the most exciting festival of the summer, is situated on the coast of Croatia, and promises spirit in abundance. The inaugural party held in the first week of September involves round-the-clock clubs and regular boat parties – all in a pretty idyllic place.

However, the most remarkable thing about SMS is its relative diversity of line up. To date, most alternative festivals focus solely (albeit brilliantly) on a specific niche; Glade, for example, would have a comprehensive roster of everyone who is anyone within electronica. But SMS delves into the niches of further spanning sub-genres. Its organisers boast an expansive soundtrack touching upon as far ranging fields as flamenco, balearic, techno and psychedelic. It has an impressive line-up, with Radioclit, Django Django and Richard Norris all making appearances, making Stop Making Sense a very worthwhile go-to for any Eastern Europe travelers or people looking for a good time (ironically, a go-to that makes a lot of sense).

So, fans of alternative music genres needn’t despair when it comes to festival season each summer. There are evidently copious opportunities to see interesting music in interesting places, whilst still enjoying the festival atmosphere. Of course, if you’d rather go the other way, then do so, but don’t say I didn’t warn you when Pete Doherty doesn’t show up.

Oh shut up…

0

I care very little about why Tony Blair is giving his book proceeds to charity. The simple fact is that when I buy his book I no longer do so to fund his retirement, but the rehabilitation of severely injured war heroes. That book will pay for at least half of a centre to help those who bore the greatest costs of conflict.

I know the press would have nothing to do if it wasn’t hating on politicians, and I know Blair’s still an easy target, but there is just bigger news to cover than this amateur psycho-analysis of charitable donation. Everyone gives to charity because it benefits them: whether that be because they feel an obligation to help; want some kind of personal gratification; or are just guilty for past deeds. Blair has his reason, it matters very little what it might be.

The university places surplus

0

Many students opening their brown envelopes on Thursday will find inside confirmation that they are one of the 70,000 hopefuls who will not be getting a place at university this year. David Lammy, Labour’s former Universities Minister, calls it the alienation “of an entire generation”. On the other hand, it may turn out we’ve done them a favour.

Governments and ministers have for years fed schoolchildren a disastrous lie – that you should go to university. They have been told that if you are clever, and if you want to succeed, then a degree is something you unquestionably must have in your pocket. An ambitious generation who annually outwit their markschemes and astound their parents (“exams must be getting easier”) take the bait, log into UCAS, and sign themselves up for £25,000 debt before they’ve ever earned a pay cheque or paid a month’s rent.

There are two lies they bite on: that university must be for them, and that university will get them a job. The first is easy to understand. Labour introduced, well before the secondary school careers of today’s students, a target of getting 50% of pupils into a university. Last year 49.8% of students got five A*-C grade GCSEs including English and Maths. If you’re an aspirational pupil in that group you’re going to believe that you should be going to university. Sadly that’s not necessarily the case. Most people don’t want to spend three years studying French by themselves in a library with six hours contact time a week. But universities, keen to cash in on the government’s previously open cheque, have brought out a whole host of more exciting degrees to entice in the masses.

The problem is not with these courses being studied, but with wedging them into a totally unsuitable system. Essentially interactive subjects are not suited to the lonely library life of the academic hermit, and this is why the facade so easily crumbles. Students realise it’s not for them, and they drop out. Almost 9% of those beginning courses in 2007 had left by the end of the academic year. The ones that leave are likely to be those with the funds or contacts to leave the security of a student loan, and pay off a year’s fees despite nothing to show for them. Those that stay are the ones caught up in the second lie, that university will find them a job.

What school leavers need is not an increase in university places, expanding in scope and volume whenever the graduate job market gets harsher. What they need is an escape route from a centralised system that files them in one of two drawers: ‘graduate’ or ‘non-graduate’; and attaches to those the labels ‘clever’ and ‘stupid’. They need an end to policy that reduces them to a target and a beginning of the chance to be a person. Essential for this is viable vocational alternatives, so that taking a different qualification or course is no longer sneered at by their ‘better educated’ peers. Vocational should also be treated to mean more than just manual work. Business, finance, administration – they’re all vocations and should all be able to be studied practically, not just academically.

We should not deny that our universities face problems. We just must not pretend that they are easy ones. The number of people who cannot find a place in clearing this week is about the number we would normally expect to drop out within a year. To claim that our universities have too few places would be misguided. The truth is they have too many.

UPDATE: Figures out today show 19% of undergraduates completing their degrees were unsatisfied with the experience. (18/08/2010)

Bali Babes ’10

0

It’s 2 in the morning. I’m on Asia’s answer to Easy Jet. Yet somewhere over the airwaves comes the chirpy, “Welcome to Paradise Island”. The plethora of wailing babies suggested otherwise, but we had made it- Bali.

I went travelling this summer with four old friends from school, the inspiration behind this (deliberately) cringe title. I say travelling, but in reality ‘holidaying’ would probably be more accurate- backpacks and hiking boots had certainly been replaced by wheeled suitcases and flip-flops. We had planned 10 days in Bali, split across the lairy capital, Kuta, and the more picturesque region of Nusa Dua. This wasn’t our first time away together, we’d always been culture vultures; our trip to Magaluf after A-levels is a case in point. Sadly our holiday plans have never qualified in that unique category either- Magaluf was packed to the rafters (of the booze cruise) with Brits, and I’ve heard many are going out to Bali this year. So I thought I’d give you the low-down on Bali…. And even if you’re not heading out, I’m sure there will be some universally useless advice given. Throw out your Lonely Planet and get reading this guide.

Money

The rupiah and I did not get on. With 1,000 rupiah translating to roughly 10p, the mental mathematician is a strong asset to any group- make sure you befriend one and invite them out with you. The only bonus to this insane currency is the feeling of being a millionaire, but that quickly passes. We didn’t only have problems doing the maths between us; it was when our money troubles involved the locals that things got sticky. Indeed, having just hailed a cab after a night out in Kuta, with some members of our group slightly worse for wear, we learned this lesson the hard way. We didn’t suspect the driver- he was small, very round and hiding behind such a strong moustache that I feared for his respiration- but fraudsters come in all shapes and sizes, and apparently with varying degrees of facial hair. We gathered our money and paid the driver the agreed 30,000 rupiah (roughly 3 pounds), but no no, this man was demanding 300,000- ten times our expected rate. And of course, due to the alcohol and arithmetic situation one of us might have promised him the wrong amount. But if you’re going to take one thing from this article it should be the knowledge that in Bali a promise is a PROMISE. Just as I began negotiations with the driver: “Look. We normally pay £2 (20,000) for this journey, we’ve only been to one bar, we’re not drunk enough to agree to a £30 (300,000) bill”, I hear screeches in the background from some very ‘respectable’ friends, “You knoooob. Knoooobbbs. We hate you.” Apparently the driver didn’t buy the ‘we’re not that drunk’ line, I can’t think why. Negotiations were over- a fond farewell to thirty pounds.

Out ‘nd about

If you’re looking for nightlife, Kuta is the place to visit. With numerous bars, clubs, karaoke bars and even a shipwreck (a purpose built structure offering another club, not a piece of history), it’s got it all. To stay on the safe side I believe it’s advised not to drink local alcohol to avoid ‘Bali belly’, but the mainstream brands are available if you ask. A personal favourite spot was the club ‘Bounty’ -the shipwreck- and in particular its accompanying bar. This bar serves its drinks in sports water bottles which allow big moves on the dance floor, yet minimal spillage. Moreover, in one corner of the club a charming piece of ‘statement’ furniture can be found, a cage, which gives the perfect opportunity for some up close and personal gyrating, or an insight into the feelings of a dancing prisoner. Kuta nightlife is heavily dominated by Australians, as Bali is far more accessible to those down-under, so if you’re aiming to bag yourself a Nicole Kidman or Hugh Jackman then you may well find them on the Balinese dance floor… or in Australia, maybe just go there.

Beaches

Bali offers some of the finest beaches in the world and Nusa Dua certainly did not disappoint. White sand, blue seas and clear skies- this was the “Paradise Island” that the flight attendant had mentioned. Jimbaran beach would be a particular recommendation for a less commercialised beauty and more authentic food. If you want to avoid over populated beaches certainly do not visit Kuta’s; sitting at the edge of the town, the crowded streets seem to pour out onto it. Plus, in the daytime, the hagglers from the town patrol the shores- an area which leads us seamlessly onto our next sub-heading…

Haggling

If a haggler says to you: “Sexy price. I love you”, he almost certainly does not love you, but wants you to buy a ‘real Chanel’ handbag that is actually a Sainsbury’s plastic bag. There are plenty of ‘Rolexes’, ‘Ray bans’ and ‘real leather handbags’ on the stalls flanking the streets of the Balinese towns- the credit crunch has clearly hit these quality brands with designer sunglasses for sale at two pounds. Remarkable. If you’re not interested on what’s on offer, be quick to walk away- lingering can lead to unfortunate situations; after an episode of this kind a man followed me down a street poking my back with a bottle opener… in the shape of a penis. Note to any guys reading this: girls do not enjoy that sort of humour, move on.

Elephants

One real treat in Bali is the endangered elephant sanctuary. This sanctuary has the largest number of rescued Sumatran elephants in the world, and I would really recommend spending a day there. The sanctuary is situated deep in the rainforest with buildings tottering on stilts, and the elephants happily roam the green space, rather than being chained-up or penned-in in small cages. The shelter gives visitors the opportunity to take a ride around the park on an elephant, but not just any old elephant, this is meet and greet time. Like a very bizarre first date, you find out the basics about your animal: our elephant was Melanie, aged 24, still single, and still looking for ‘the one’. She was just another girl doing her thing -as she waved her trunk at me, I knew we’d be friends for life… or something sentimental like that.

All in all, Bali is a peculiar mix; it combines immense natural beauty with the tackiness of a velour tracksuit; the most tranquil beaches with nightlife akin to Fuzzy Ducks. With only 10 days on the island, I’m not sure that I sought out all the hidden treasures- Bali boasts several beautiful temples and ancient settlements that I wish I’d had time to explore. With hostels and even fairly luxurious hotels at brilliant prices, it’s the perfect place to go with friends, but if you’re looking to go away for a more enlightening trip, there’s plenty on offer too.

Great exploitations: the internship debate

0

Seeing all my friends applying for law and banking internships in the early days of Michaelmas 2009 set me on the case trying to get work experience myself. I knew I didn’t want to enter the corporate world, and so began writing to advertising agencies, magazines, newspapers and TV production companies. Many months and many emails later I managed to set myself up 4 weeks’ experience at a monthly magazine, which I was delighted about, despite the fact that it was completely unpaid.

I arrived on the first day, and was quickly directed to the intern desk, which used to be a paid assistant position, but had recently been turned by some wily money-saver (keen to preserve the office Christmas party budget) into a rolling secretarial position filled by keen graduating or near graduating interns, more than willing, in fact, begging, to work for free. Super-keen as I was, I spent a month running around, returning clothes to PR firms, answering phones and tidying people’s desks.

I wouldn’t call the experience personally fulfilling, or in itself really useful. None of the skills I learnt, which mainly revolved around a greater control over sellotape and brown boxes, were really what I was looking for from a magazine internship. I was not observing and shadowing those in the office, in fact, I was never given any real description of how the magazine was run, or even what my endless stream of tasks were directed towards. If I’d wanted to spend my summer in a secretarial position, I could have signed myself up to a temporary agencies and been paid for the tasks I was privileged to do at this magazine.

I’m not saying that I regret the experience, I don’t. The month’s slog was worth it even just for the line on the CV, but it certainly wasn’t what I’d expected. Being one of a long line of interns in a company which, in essence, saves on a paid secretarial position with a rolling set of bright-eyed undergraduates left me with a bitter taste and perhaps even sense of exploitation.

In fact, the law states pretty clearly the case surrounding such a scenario. “Work” includes having set hours for any extended period of time, and being given defined roles rather than simply observing. The law says anyone who is “working” should be being paid the minimum wage of £5.80 an hour.

My “internship” definitely fell under this category. When you’re expected to be at work at a certain time every morning, to complete concrete tasks every day,when your tasks are assigned to the extent that you might be working whilst the person in the paid position next to you is filing their nails at their desk, it’s not unreasonable to inspect a wage, in fact, it’s illegal not to.

Many working bodies have picked up on the problems surrounding free-labour dressed up as an “internship”. The Low Pay Commission in 2010, published a report suggesting that “there is a systematic abuse of interns, with a growing number of people undertaking “work” but excluded from the minimum wage”. Companies rely on graduates’ keenness to get experience and fill up their CV in a way which is undisputedly unfair, but extends to discriminatory. Those from a lower income background may not be able to afford to work unpaid, and when they do take, what is a financial gamble, their experience may be menial desk labour. Lucky enough to live in London, my travel expenses of £5 a day were actually able to cover my travel costs. However, for those without easy access to the South East, these internships are inaccessible, and unattainable with no money to cover accommodation costs. The Panel on Fair Access to the Professions indicated that many internship opportunities are based in London, including 90 per cent of internships in law and nearly 60 per cent of banking internships.

Some say that unpaid work experience is part of a young person building their CV, but this seems unfair when opportunities are so concentrated, and when ability to accept such a position is dependent on financial background. The fact that parliament (a field already criticized for elitism and the narrow social spectrum of its members) employs an estimated 450 interns in parliament, working an estimated 18,000 hours of unpaid work a week can do nothing but perpetuate such a statistic.

The Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development has proposed an intern’s minimum wage of £2.50, mirroring the minimum wage rate for apprentices that is being introduced from October 2010. But its seems doubtful that this £20 or so a day could go far enough to combat the real problems of skewed internship opportunities, given that the accredited living wage in London is £7.60 an hour.

That’s not to say that everyone is convinced by the necessity of an intern’s wage or the plight of intern’s working conditions. Barbara Ellen argues in The Observer, in an article entitled “Hey intern, get me a coffee and stop wingeing” that “spoiled, deluded innocents find the unwritten laws of the internship, the traditional exchange of slave labour for the holy grail of experience, a strange and chilling concept” and that interning is “a short-term lesson in humiliation…and suck it up”.

Ellen makes the distinction between opportunities to do such internships (which are skewed steeply towards the financially supported) and the content of these internships themselves. What she fails to understand is the direct connection between the two. Many people, even those from financially unstable background, are prepared to do a stint of unpaid work experience as part of boosting their CV, but when you’re staking the wage of a paid job, you expect to be doing something useful. The trouble comes when the unpaid experience stops being a way to gain experience, and becomes the equivalent of a full-time job that they are doing for free.

Seventy-two hours in Syria

0

‘Let me guess – sunny and warm?’

Without even looking we proffered this appropriate greeting to our first full day in Damascus. After a four-day tour of Lebanon (recounted in some earlier articles), my friend and I moved-on to Syria, primarily Damascus but with planned trips into the surrounding countryside, first to Bosra and then Palmyra.

When it came time to negotiate a taxi to Bosra, about two hours south of Damascus, we were so accustomed to the experience that we burst out laughing at the outrageous first offers from the drivers. Clearly they were not used to dealing with such quick-study tourists because they couldn’t quite catch themselves smiling at our bargaining prowess. (Hard-earned, to be sure, after we locked ourselves in a Lebanese taxi, forcing the driver to give us our correct change or else forgo an afternoon of additional fares.) We eventually agreed to a price less than half of where we started and felt tremendously satisfied; only later did we find out from a local that we still overpaid. ‘Said the spider to the fly…’ Those smiles, we should have known.

Less beguiling was our experience of Syrian politics. The situation is complicated, far more so than one might think after reading, for example, the description offered by the U.S. State Department: ‘Officially, Syria is a republic. In reality, however, it is an authoritarian regime that exhibits only the forms of a democratic system.’ All of which is true, and to be sure, talking about politics with Syrians can be surreal. We had the following exchange with a Syrian student at the American University of Beirut:

‘Did you vote in the last election?’ [To confirm Syrian President Bashar Al-Asad.]

‘Of course.’

‘Who was the opposition?’

‘What do you mean?’

‘If you didn’t vote for the president, who would you have voted for?’

‘No one, it was either Yes or No.’

‘Do you have political parties in Syria?’

‘What is that?’

When he grew wary of our questions, fairly pointing-out that many westerners just want to hear that all Syrians hate their president, we tried to explain that our interest was purely academic:

‘So, for example, whereas Syria amended its constitution in 2000 to permit Bashar to become president before age forty, Britain doesn’t even have a constitution.’

‘What is a constitution?’

What’s complicated is that while political discussion is clearly self-censored, it took us days to realize that Facebook is banned in Syria because most internet cafes used proxy servers. We met two other Syrians, Sary and Radwan, both employed by the same local private firm, who, after learning we were Canadian, asked us why Jon Stewart was always giving Canada such a hard time on The Daily Show. Most perplexing of all: the U.S. considers Syria ‘a regional hub for Iranian support to terrorist groups, such as hizballah’. The only building between the Lebanese and Syrian borders, its pink and orange sign resplendent with hegemonic glory? Dunkin’ Donuts.

Just for fun, we challenged Sary and Radwan to an arm-wrestling contest to see who would pick-up the cheque for our drinks. (We invited them for drinks after they translated our explanation to the Syrian military of why we were taking pictures of an abandoned school that turned-out to be a military facility.) The catch: Winner pays. (We paid.)

This raises some interesting observations about male culture in Syria. There were very few women out-and-about, shopping or working, even in more cosmopolitan Damascus. (We saw almost no women, other than tourists, in the desert town of Palmyra.) What we did see were many men walking around, arm-in-arm, even holding hands. Most gay culture in Syria is underground (necessitated by Article 520 of the Syrian penal code, which punishes ‘carnal relations against the order of nature’ with three years imprisonment), so at first we didn’t know what we were seeing. After we gave it a go and no one seemed to notice (my friend and I are clearly not Syrian, so it could have a different significance for us), we started to think the situation was more like being in an all-boys school: with no females around, there is less pressure to appear hyper-masculine in the perpetual competition for mates. The West, of course, struggles in the opposite direction, where there are many more women in public but just as many men worried about ‘looking gay’. Two ships, alas, pass each other in the night.

To end on a lighter note, it turns out that the Syrians (like the Lebanese) are crazy for football. On our way back to Damascus from Palmyra, three hours through the Syrian desert, we stopped at the Baghdad Cafe (about 130km from its namesake) to purchase water. There was nothing but sand, rocks and highway as far as we could see in every direction. My friend emerged from the shop to report that the owner ‘likes Germany in the World Cup’. Of course he does. Back in Palmyra the previous evening, we joined most of the town crowded inside the only restaurant with a subscription to the World Cup channel, watching Spain defeat Paraguay in the quarter finals. As the game wound-down a donkey-cart lumbered by outside, taking advantage of the cool evening atmosphere (about thirty degrees centigrade). The second-loudest cheer of the evening erupted when Spain scored the winning goal, eclipsed almost immediately by an even louder cheer as the camera panned the crowd to show distraught – but beautiful – female Paraguayans. Of course we joined in the enthusiasm.

Unclear fallout

0

A month or two removed from the Deutsch demolition at Bloemfontein, English football stands at a perilous juncture, though the casual observer might be forgiven for forgetting it. After all, the stiff corpse of England’s execrable World Cup campaign will soon be buried, cast aside and swept away from the pristine path of the Premier League and its travelling circus, national interest absconding for at least 2 long and seemingly uncertain years. But, what better antidote to the horrorshow, so the argument goes, than the return of the self-crowned “Best League In The World”?

As ever, the country’s summer fling with international football ends in tears and hangovers and re-razed delusions of success, an embarrassment, another shameful notch on the bedpost of our being done over at the sport’s highest level. And yet, despite pitiful performances that evoked as much shock as abject disappointment, the FA’s meagre excuse for an exhaustive post-mortem amounts to some petty finger-pointing and a belated soul-searching over Capello’s obese contract, and not much else besides.

A dissection of the Three cowardly Lions evinces some simple truths: no heart, no guts, and no football brains. Added to this cocktail for sporting failure was an element of the supernatural, of the flat-out inexplicable- how else can we account for the staggering desertion of Rooney’s first touch against Algeria? The droning vuvuzelas were ominously funereal for the cadaver of our so-called Golden Generation, an inflated epigram that should’ve died with Sven but achieved its ironic apotheosis in South Africa.

My problem, though, centres upon the useless attempts at a constructive debrief, both from within the FA’s own walls and from the wider media. Yes, it’s true that the boom of the Premier League, attracting legions of talented immigrants like moths to a spectacularly lucrative flame, has diluted the football gene-pool of English talent: fewer opportunities exist to secure a squad-number and a contract, let alone minutes on the pitch or even a space on the bench. Artificial attempts to remedy this process are frequent and sincere, but the engine of international business is not lightly stalled: City’s Sheikhs and Chelsea’s oligarch do not lose sleep over the search for Steven Gerrard’s long-term replacement, do they?

Recently, then, a useless assumption has brazenly infected even the most intelligent of our sports journalists: that we cannot expect to upkeep a truly world-class domestic league and simultaneously nurture a successful national team- in other words, we should be grateful for one, not greedy for both.

This is nonsense, of course: Spain are now world and European champions, and La Liga is, in many important aspects, vastly superior to the Premier League. Spain triumphs where England fails in the delicate balance of its top division; foreign commodities are imported when necessary, but young Spaniards are given genuine opportunities to flourish and mature. English clubs will sooner recruit from Brazilian backwaters than from their own reserve teams, or at least it appears that way: one senses that Arsenal’s impressive Wilshere might already be a global name if he were a Juan instead of a Jack.

Excuses proliferate, but action must be taken, and soon. Spain is the ideal prototype for emulation, and we can certainly learn something from the Germans, too. The country should be capable of delivering an international product that does justice to the quality, excitement and attraction of its domestic competition: the FA, Capello, and England’s players need to discover a resolution to this heinous perennial problem, the quandary of our repeated failure at all the big dances.

Magdalen top Norrington table for first time

0

Magdalen top the Norrington table for the first time ever, with over half of Magdalen finalists awarded First Class honours this year.

The Norrington score was developed by Sir Arthur Norrington, former President of Trinity, in the 1960s to provide a way of measuring the performance of students, by college, in finals.

It works, according to the University of Oxford webpage, by attaching a score of 5 to a 1st class degree, 3 to a 2:1 degree, 2 to a 2:2 degree and 1 to a 3rd class degree. A total score is then calculated, and expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score (ie five times the number of degrees awarded). The score allows a ranking of colleges. The greater the percentage, the better a college did.

The table is based on interim results, and a final version will be made available in October.

Third year linguist Harry Phillips said of the success: “Magdalen has had something of a golden year, proving itself not only to be a political powerhouse, but also a centre of intellectual superiority. Long may its Norrington domination continue”.

Norrington table results (sorted by rank) 2009/2010

1. Magdalen

2. Corpus Christi

3. Merton

4. St John’s

5. New

6. University

7. Christ Church

8. Worcester

9. Balliol

10. Jesus

11. Oriel

12. Wadham

13. Hertford

14. Queen’s

15. St Catherine’s

16. Lincoln

17. Pembroke

18. St Anne’s

19. St Hugh’s

20. Brasenose

21. Lady Margaret Hall

22. St Hilda’s

23. Trinity

24. St Edmund Hall

25. Somerville

26. Exeter

27. St Peter’s

28. Keble

29. Mansfield

30. Harris Manchester

A more detailed breakdown can be found here: http://www.ox.ac.uk/about_the_university/facts_and_figures/undergraduate_degr_2.html

Fritzl to hit-zl

0

Jack’s world measures eleven feet by eleven feet. He shares Room with TV and Bath and Meltedy Spoon and Rocker and, of course, with Ma. Oh, there’s Dora, too, who lives in TV and goes exploring with him. But she isn’t real. Then there’s Old Nick, who comes in some nights to make Bed creak with Ma. He has to hide in Wardrobe those nights, because Old Nick can never see him. Jack’s not sure if Old Nick’s real or not. Maybe…he becomes real when he comes into Room?

This is the world of Room, the new sure-fire bestseller that crept onto the Booker longlist before it was even published, and has already been installed by the bookies as joint favourite to win. Describing the world of a child born into captivity from that five year-old boy’s perspective, it catches a kind of zeitgeist that emerged after the Josef Fritzl case. Just in case you had any doubts about the sign of destiny hanging over this book, it comes complete with glowing recommendations from some of the best-selling authors of the modern era.

What do they say? Well, here’s the view of Audrey Niffenegger, who wrote the Tesco 3-for-2 paperbacks staple The Time Traveller’s Wife: “Room is a book to read in one sitting.” This is precisely my problem with it. You should not be able to digest a potentially Booker-winning novel in a single day. The book recently voted “Booker of Bookers,” Midnight’s Children, took me two weeks. Even last year’s overrated winner Wolf Hall took six days.

Am I dismissing Room just because of an inborn snobbery about thrillers? Absolutely. The purpose of the literary novel is to challenge its readers, to make them swallow difficult truths, to make them think really, really hard. Whereas when you read Room your heart pounds, you cry a little bit if you’re a girl, and when you finish you look at the world around you and think “well thank God I’m free.” And then you forget all about it.

Room is not stupid. Emma Donoghue has put a huge amount of imaginative effort and sympathy into writing it, and it is hardly ever as mawkish as it ought to be. There are several scenes where she uses Jack’s five year-old eyes brilliantly. The satire on the media is clever, especially when Oprah interviews his mother, and in another scene when a group of sofallectuals are discussing Jack’s case:

“There’s a woman, too. ‘But surely, at a symbolic level, Jack’s the child sacrifice,’ she says, ‘cemented into the foundations to placate the spirits.’

“Huh?

“Grandma comes in and switches the TV right off, scowling. ‘Those guys spent too much time at college.'”

But in spite of all this, Room is intellectually shallow. It’s very much like Mark Haddon’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime, but with captivity in place of Aspergers Syndrome. I would go so far as to say that it would not be on the Booker longlist at all were it not for our ghoulish fascination with the Fritzl case. If Room beats Peter Carey’s Parrot and Olivier, something is profoundly wrong with the way the nation reads books.