Monday 4th August 2025
Blog Page 2025

Cardinal cock-up

Calls to paramedics, an insufficient number of security officers and overcrowding caused chaos at the Cardinals’ Cocktails event last Saturday.  

In a letter of complaint to the President of the Christ Church drinking society, the Union’s bar manager, Earl Smith, criticised the security and lack of a separate first aid team.

He also pointed out that the emergency service had to be called three times.

Between 550 and 700 guests attended the Cardinals’ party hosted at the Oxford Union, where unlimited drinks were served. However, the guest capacity for the event was 500, resulting in overcrowding of the debating chamber and the marquee.

Sam Martin, the President of the Cardinals society admitted that  the event “did get busy”, but he was unsure how many guests exactly attended the event as “it is very difficult on the night to tell how many people are in”.

Mae Penner, a second-year linguist, said, “It was very crowded, to the point that you were crushed.” David Thomas, an Exeter student who also attended the event agreed, “To be honest, there were just too many people there.

“That got the security stressed, and the pressure led to some questionably excessive behaviour by security staff, who seemed to have decided that  everyone in black tie was a threat.” There were also problems with the number of security guards.

The Cardinals hired only 5 security guards. Union regulations stipulate that one security member has to be assigned per 100 people, but those present claim there were more than 500 guests.

Another concern was that there was no separate first aid team, meaning that security officers trained in first aid had to be redeployed to attend to medical situations. 

An anonymous attendee of the event commented, “Given the massive number of people attending, I was very surprised at easy it was to gatecrash. I and a couple of friends got in quite unproblematically through a window in the bar.”
The letter of complaint also mentions the aggressive behaviour of gate crashers, which resulted in one of the guards having his thumb crushed.

Barman Smith wrote, “One of the security was ordered by someone other than myself to look after a musician that was playing in the tent, which left the St Michael’s gate being unattended and resulting 10-15 gate crashers entering and it was a hassle to find them and kick them out. 

“A fight broke out at the gate when the gate crashers were thrown out which resulted in one of the security having his thumb crushed by the gate.”
This was confirmed by Shaun from the Tunstan SIA security company, which was used during the event. He said, “James had his thumb hurt in the gate, there were no broken bones, but some torn ligaments…he’ll live.” He added, “He tore his ligaments as he ejected 6 people that were not invited, one of the gatecrashers threw the gate back at him.” 

The emergency services also had to be called three times to take people to A & E, following excessive alcohol consumption.

Sam Martin admitted, “Unfortunately, the student mentality can mean that some people drink beyond their limits- in lesser cases our bar staff offered them tap water but we always ensure that if clearly necessary, these people are dealt with appropriately by medical staff.

“Such instances are obviously regrettable, but for the majority [of people] Cardinals’ Cocktails proved to be another successful and enjoyable event.”
The extensive criticism of the event led Stuart Cullen, the President of the Oxford Union, to ask, “would it be responsible for us to let you hold the event here ever again?”

Martin denied claims that the event was overcrowded. He also said that the contract between the Cardinals and the Oxford Union Society does not stipulate the allowed numbers.

The contract signed in September 2009 does not mention any numbers specifically, but refers to “requirements set down for an event like this”. 
During the Standing Committee on Monday Sam Martin outlined steps to be taken to prevent any future problems. He mentioned increasing the number of security and closely monitoring the number of people attending the event.
He said on the night, “We sold four hundred advanced tickets and the safety and security of our guests is always our number one priority.

“We always take steps to ensure there is more than adequate security and first-aid provision on hand and all necessary health and safety precautions were taken.”

Stuart Cullen said that he was “disatisfied that the Cardinals have no idea how many people were in attendance. I feel this is a problem.

“Union staff were unhappy and on that basis so am I,” he said.

Review: Bent

0

James Corrigan’s production of Bent by Martin Sherman, a play dealing with the Nazi suppression of the homosexuals, is a thought-provoking and ambitious piece, and one which will certainly engender much discussion when it opens at the O’Reilly.

The giggles of the press preview audience at the onstage nudity in the opening scene were soon silenced by the actors’ believable portrayal of the anguished suffering in concentration camps, even without the visual aid of the piles of corpses which will provide a focal point in the final performance.

Chris Greenwood put in a moving performance as Max, the play’s central character. It is one of the play’s great strengths that Max is not merely painted as a victim but as an emotionally complex character. Perhaps slightly more attention could have been paid to considering the effects of Max’s wealthy background on his characterisation as this came slightly as a surprise.

Max’s boyfriend Rudy (Matt Gavan) provided a neat contrast to the central role and some humour. Gavan’s movements around the stage felt very natural, yet although his vocal performance was obviously designed to be in opposition to Max’s, delivery was a little too rushed at times – something easily correctible before the play’s opening.

Joe Eyre (as Horst) and Jared Fortune (as Wolf) played some difficult scenes with conviction, although Fortune’s simpering glances at Max in the first scene were a little too comic. The contrast between Fortune’s death throes and Jacob Lloyd’s rendition of ‘Streets of Berlin’ provided one of the play’s most powerful passages, showing subtly of direction.

One weakness in characterisation which all the actors shared, with the partial exception of Brian McMahon (as Uncle Freddie), was a separation from the time period. While the concentration camp setting was gruellingly believable, there was little sense that this was 1930s Berlin at the play’s opening – a problem which needs to be looked at not only in terms of costume and set design but in individual performances.

Further design elements should add a lot to this production. The fence which will be constructed between the audience and the actors should be a particularly effective design tool – not only highlighting the segregation of the gay community but placing the audience in a fittingly voyeuristic position. Bent is an ambitious and well-executed piece in which minor errors will be ironed out easily before performance. It should prove very popular at the O’Reilly next week.

Review: Blood Wedding

0

Isit and watch intently as the ensemble stand before me, taking turns at random to count to twenty, eyes closed, faces showing expressions of complete concentration. A seemingly simple feat, anyone who has ever attempted theatrical ensemble work will be familiar with the difficulty of this exercise, which involves counting from one to twenty, where no two members may say the same number simultaneously.

The intangible bond of the group that was made apparent in their warm-up carried solemnly through the entire play. The actors were not performing as individual characters, but working together as an ensemble. Not for one second was the faith of a character lost, a line forgotten, or a silence unintentional. Brittany Ashworth and Ellen Jones’s jointly directed rendition of Frederico Garcia Lorca’s Blood Wedding, introduces most characters not by name, but rather by familiar relation. As such, the play centres around the arranged marriage between the Groom (Tom Garton) and Bride (Chloë Wicks), who still harbours feelings for a past lover, Leonardo (Alex Khosla). Set in the early 1930s, this lyrical drama tells a tale of raw human grief, family honour, and rebellion against the overpowering restraints of a rural Andalusian existence.

Though a tragedy, the cast have successfully incorporated subtle moments of physical comedy which provide a welcome break from the solemn atmosphere of the rest of the play. Additionally, the intensity and drama of the acting is broken up with elements of choreographed dancing and singing. The songs are accompanied at different times by two guitarists, a cello and a violinist set to original music written by Genevieve Dawson. The lullaby sung in Spanish in harmony by the Bride and Mother-in-Law (Olivia Charton-Jones) in the second scene of Act One, which foreshadows much of the tragedy ahead, effectively incorporates the beauty of the original Spanish verse.

This production of Blood Wedding, or Bodas de Sangre , has stayed true to its Spanish roots. Despite the risk of losing its meaning in translation by singing the lullaby in Spanish, the emotions, regardless of language, are well-captured and preserve the original spirit adding authenticity to the play.
To describe any production in one word is a great challenge. Confused Production’s Blood Wedding is the exception to this rule. Passion.

five stars

Blood Wedding is at the OFS from Tuesday – Saturday, 7.30pm

Review: ‘Love’ by Angels and Airwaves

0

Angels and Airwaves aren’t what you might call a ‘normal’ rock band. There’s no charming back-story of all the members meeting at school and instantly becoming friends for life. Instead, they’re more of a second-generation group, formed from an odd mixture of bits of other bands: the drummer is from The Offspring, the bassist originally played for 30 Seconds To Mars, and their lead singer is Blink-182 front man, Tom DeLonge. A little surprisingly, the end result of this medley is actually rather good.

Released as a free digital download, their latest album Love was described by DeLonge as the ‘biggest release’ of his life. Although perhaps not the masterpiece he promised, it certainly appears to illustrate a growing maturity, both in his music and attitude to life. The flickering, darting introduction to ‘Soul Survivor’, the dreamy ‘Et Ducit Mundum Per Luce’, the frantic crescendos in ‘Hallucinations’ – they are all indicative of a band that are beginning to free themselves from the limitations of typical American pop-punk.

Every now and then they slip back into their comfort zone, and a couple of the songs aren’t quite as ambitious as one would like them to be (Epic Holiday in particular is dangerously reminiscent of Green Day), while their fondness for guitar effects occasionally threatens to drown us in a vague, over-distorted mess.

Nevertheless, the large majority of tracks seem well polished and flow smoothly into each other, although there is perhaps a slightly repetitive feel, with the album repeatedly trying to drag the listener into swelling crescendos, which becomes tiresome. If one looks past these minor faults, however, it is possible to enjoy Love.

It doesn’t quite live up to the hype: it’s not world changing and it’s certainly no ‘blend of Radiohead and U2′, but we can forgive DeLonge his over-zealous ambitions. Apart from his comparison of Love to Pink Floyd’s The Wall, that is. Too far, Tom, too far.

Sound of the Underground

0

Cast your mind back a few of years and you may remember the hype surrounding indie four-piece The Sunshine Underground. Their debut album Raise The Alarm received great critical acclaim and the band hotly tipped to become the next big thing. However a long period of inactivity resulted in the band almost disappearing into the ether. Having now released their sophomore album, Nobody’s Coming To Save You, I caught up with front man Craig Wellington and guitarist Stuart Jones to discuss their background and return to the music scene.

From early on in the interview it’s apparent that the band have worked restlessly from the start to achieve success and to build up a strong fan-base. Things began to get serious for the band when they relocated from Shrewsbury to Leeds. Jones explains the importance of the decision; ‘We moved up there with the band in mind – if we had an evening off from work we’d spend it rehearsing.’ The fresh and versatile music scene and plentiful venues gave the group a platform to unleash their energetic live performances. After the release of Raise The Alarm the band embarked on a large tour, and soon sweaty local gigs turned into festival appearances, most notably at Glastonbury. The guys thrive off their live shows and Jones speaks passionately about them, ‘It’s nice when it’s a challenge to share the bill; not everyone’s there to see you play’.

Wellington describes The Sunshine Underground as ‘a guitar band, with dance music influences’. The band’s combination of quirky offbeat rhythms and funk driven guitars resulted in them being branded as being part of the ‘new-rave’ movement alongside acts like Klaxons and Hadouken in 2007. Although the exposure was appreciated, it was not a pigeonholing the band wanted to embrace. ‘It was invented by NME, but everyone knew it was a quick label that would be extinct in six months.’

The band’s reluctance to jump on this media-constructed bandwagon was a large factor in why the group’s second album has taken so long to see the light of day. Wellington explains how they wanted to create a very different record to their first; ‘We had to try and make our own sound.’ Despite taking a long time to get their act together, Wellington is much happier with how the album came together the second time around. ‘It felt much more like making a record this time; we had more time to think about the mood we wanted’. By working with Kasabian producer Barny the band have been able to hold much more creative control over their sound in the studio. Being signed to independent label City Rockers has allowed the band time to mature since their first effort (a relative luxury compared with the pressure often imposed by major record labels).

Over the course of their break the band wrote almost thirty new songs. With regard to the final track selection Jones jokes: ‘after extensively touring the first record you think to yourself, “do I really want to be playing this song live?”‘ The result is a follow up album packed with infectious vocal hooks and soaring guitar riffs – as Wellington puts it, ‘we always like big choruses!’ I was interested in what the band thought about the changes in the music industry since they first started. ‘We’ve come to the conclusion that our album is going to get ripped illegally – everyone’s does – but in a way we don’t mind that now. Obviously it would be ace if everyone pays for it, but if someone does steal our album and likes it, hopefully they’ll pay to come to a gig, or even buy the CD’. Jones has a refreshingly positive attitude to the bleaker side of the

music industry: ‘Spotify is brilliant to be honest, the more people that hear [our record] the better’.

The band hope to be returning to the festival circuit this summer and Jones jokes that the only way they’ll manage to headline Glastonbury is by befriending and marrying festival co-organiser Emily Eavis. I’m tempted to say that The Sunshine Underground could one day headline, but judging by the inaccuracy of past predictions, I’ll just settle for a third record sometime before 2014 instead.

Here’s What You’ve Missed: 6th Week

0

This week audiences give their views on ‘Imperium’, the Oxford Imps’ latest show at the BT, and ‘Platform’, the Oxford University Dance Society’s latest offering at the Keble O’Reilly.

The Cherwell Fashion Guide to… Playground Style

0

 

Our fashion editors show you how to look amazing in sequined tops and skinny jeans… on a swing set.

Beer before wine, a scientifically-sound rhyme?

0

It’s a widely-accepted mantra which can be found in some form or other in most Western cultures. In England I learnt it as ‘Beer before wine is fine, wine before beer—oh dear!’ Anywhere groups of people gather together to partake in that age-old pastime of drinking too much this little ditty is often passed around as solid advice.

Similar proverbs can be found in Germany („Bier auf Wein, das laß sein!”), Hungary, Sweden…even the West Country has its own scrumpy-based version: ‘Beer on cider makes a good rider!’ The only exception to the rule appears to be the American saying, ‘Beer before liquor, never been sicker!’ which forgoes wine altogether in favour of straight-up spirits and even then gets the order the wrong way around compared to everyone else.

But, given the universal popularity of the proverb, is there actually any scientific evidence to back up the notion that the sequence of drinks over the course of a night out is key to one’s intoxication and subsequent hangover?

The short answer to that is ‘no’. As far as me and my search engine can tell there have been no decisive studies carried out in a laboratory setting to put the saying to the test. That hasn’t stopped numerous bloggers from making their own ad-hoc ‘reckoning’ on the subject.

‘The reasoning behind the proverb is that it’s easier on your body to absorb weaker alcoholic drinks, like beer, later on in the evening’ explained one defender of the American version on a Q&A page.

Well, not necessarily; it’s true that the concentration of alcohol does appear to have an effect on the rate of its absorption. One study that took place back in the golden ages of prohibition found that low alcohol concentrations (2.75%) were absorbed at a slower rate than higher concentrations (27.5%). A later set of experiments testing out a wider range of concentrations however argued for a ‘curvilinear’ relationship. Here, scientists found that alcohol drunk at concentrations more closely resembling those of wine (15%) or neat spirits (45%) were absorbed more slowly than a mid-range concentration of 30%. Indeed one of the most recent studies, conducted at the University of Manchester, found that drinking straight vodka actually led to slower rates of alcohol absorption and lower peak blood alcohol levels than drinking the same quantity of vodka but in a diluted form.

Now before you all go off downing shots of Smirnoff tomorrow with the misguided notion that it will make you less drunk, please keep in mind that these sorts of experiments can often be somewhat removed from the real-world situation. Those scientists up at Manchester had their poor test subjects drinking vodka either neat or mixed with nought but tap water, at nine in the morning after a night of fasting. No doubt there are some serious differences between that situation and your average night down the pub, and some could prove to be mitigating factors; not least of which how much alcohol you choose to drink, and at what rate you choose to drink it.

Bubbles are another often touted explanation for the saying. It’s commonly thought that the carbon dioxide found in lager or other types of fizz helps to boost the effects of alcohol. Many people talk of the bubbles in champagne ‘going straight to their heads‘, actually they go straight to their guts. The gas in a carbonated drink is believed to speed up the movement of your stomach contents into the small intestine where alcohol is known to be absorbed more readily. So maybe if you drink a fizzy alcoholic beverage like champagne, or as the rhyme would have it beer, on top of a stomach-full of wine, the resultant surge of alcohol into the small intestine would leave you knocked for six.

Surprisingly, there have only been a couple of studies looking into whether bubbles give alcohol a helping hand. One scientist, Fran Ridout, in an experiment originally reported in New Scientist, invited some of the volunteers in her department to a ‘drinks party’ before plying them with glasses of champagne. Half the guests were given normal fizzy champagne and half were given champagne that had previously been attacked with a whisk, rendering it ‘fizzless’. After each person had drunk two glasses Ridout then measured their blood alcohol levels and put them through a number of psychometric tests. I must say if I were one of these ‘guests’ I would be starting to think this a queer sort of party by this stage. Nevertheless, those people who had been drinking the fizzy champagne showed a faster rise in their blood alcohol levels compared to those who had drunk flat champagne. They were also slower at noticing objects in their peripheral vision, although this was the only one out of nine measures of mental faculty in which the two groups showed any real difference. It should also be noted that the flat champers group did eventually catch up, and had built up comparable blood alcohol levels to their fizzy counterparts after thirty minutes. Thus, while bubbles may help speed the way to intoxication, it’s a place we all get to in the end, whether we opt for alcohol fizzy or flat.

So when it comes to determining the order of our tipples it looks like science has little to offer us in the way of advice. But it may still be able to tell us what type of drink to choose. A study published last month in Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research appears to have confirmed another widely-held belief, that the colour of your alcohol is linked to your suffering the next day. Scientists at Brown University found that giving volunteers dark coloured drinks such as bourbon led to more severe hangovers than clear alternatives like vodka. The finger of guilt in this effect is pointed at congeners, small amounts of toxins and other by-products in alcohol that build up during the fermentation process. Congeners occur in greater numbers in darker alcoholic drinks. Bourbon, for example, contains 37 times more congeners than vodka, and are believed to enhance the painful qualities of a hangover. But again these findings may need to be taken with a pinch of salt and a slice of lemon. The severity of hangovers was assessed on a series of self-rating scales filled out by the participants. While those who had drank bourbon reported worse hangover the next day, this was not reflected in any alcohol-related sleep disturbances or in their performance on psychometric tests. Despite attempts by the scientists to mask the identity of the alcohol being consumed, volunteers could easily tell when they were downing bourbon and coke rather than vodka; thus it’s debatable how much the expectations of the participants led them to report worse hangovers in connection with the darker alcohol.

Arguably the best way to avoid a pounding hangover first thing on a weekday morning is to avoid drinking at all the night before, but you don’t need me or a disgruntled tutor to tell you that. Steering clear of drinks steeped in hangover-inducing congeners might be one option next time you’re down the college bar, or you could take a leaf out of the Victorian gentleman’s book and invest in a ‘swizzle stick’ to help get rid of those pesky bubbles in one’s drink.

Perhaps one day scientists will focus their efforts on determining whether chasing Chardonnay with Carling really is a recipe for disaster, or if Budweiser before Bordeaux is the way to go. Until that time I’m afraid it’s down to your own level judgement. Please enjoy science responsibly!

St John’s told: "Grow Up"

0

John’s students have been warned over their rowdy behaviour after it emerged that college staff complained about incidents at a recent Guest Dinner.

In an email to the JCR from the domestic secretaries, Mary Renton and Sophie Graham, it was revealed that wine had been stolen from the college kitchen during the dinner, and that those present had engaged in the throwing of decorations and food.

The

email stated, “College wine was stolen from the Garden Quad kitchen- this is very upsetting behaviour, especially considering we provided ample alcohol. As a result we have had to cover the costs.”

The email continued, “Food was being ‘splattered’ around which made a mess for the buttery staff to clean up. We have nothing to say on this matter apart from GROW UP.”

Renton confirmed that wine had been stolen, but explained, “The wine that was stolen was not a considerable amount (a few bottles) but it is the principle of the act that has lead to the current situation. We have liaised with college and come up with strategies to ensure this doesn’t happen again.”

As a result of the theft, the drinks reception following the next Guest Dinner, which is usually open to friends of the diners, will be exclusively for those with tickets.

Renton added, “The general reports from the night were that it was a huge success so these complaints refer to a small minority.

“We have alerted the JCR to these events and warned that should this occur again there will be disciplinary action. All parties involved feel the situation will be resolved and we are all hoping that the next Guest Dinner (Friday 6th week) will run smoothly. At St John’s Guest Dinners are renowned for being great fun and we hope to continue this tradition.”

Martha Mackenzie, John’s JCR President praised the hard work of the domestic secretaries, pointing out that the dinners are very popular events within the college.

She added, “The recent reports of bad behaviour concern a very small minority. The fact that a stern talking to was the only sanction necessary proves that, as a whole, John’s students are trusted to behave well. Tomorrow’s guest dinner is still going ahead and having seen the decorations it is likely to be as fantastic as ever!”

Second year John’s student Charlotte Roberts did not think the night was ruined by the events which took place, “The incidents have been blown a little bit out of proportion…College reacted badly, as it was unfair on the staff, but I imagine it was how it is at most other colleges.” She added, “I thought it was a fantastic evening.”

The evening took place on the 5th of February, and cost diners £30. The theme was ‘Arabian Nights’, and guests were entertained by belly dancers from the Oxford Dance Society.

John’s Guest Dinners are bi-termly events organised by the domestic secretaries, with staff and food provided by the college.

Trinity fish murdered

0

Last weekend, detergent was poured into the fishpond in Trinity College’s Fellows’ garden, killing all but one of the fish.

The pond will need to be drained and cleaned as a result.

In an email to the college, Nick Barber, the Dean of Trinity, stated that he was “saddened” by the “cruel act of vandalism.”

He told JCR members that after a “swift and effective investigation by the Dean of Balliol, a group of students from that college has owned up to the act.”

Alastair Travis, Balliol JCR President, commented, “A few individuals from Balliol, meaning no serious harm, planned a prank to put some washing up liquid in a fountain in Trinity. They found their access to the fountain blocked – instead finding the pond (which, in the darkness, they were not aware as being a fish-pond). After the damage was reported to the dean, they quickly owned up to the incident and the associated financial and decanal punishments.

The Dean of Trinity warned students at the college that “Trinity will not tolerate any ‘reprisals’ against Balliol. Any action of this type will lead to significant fines – well beyond the ordinary punishments I have levelled for bad behaviour in the past.”

Students at Trinity have expressed distress at the attack.

Damien Conyngham-Hynes commented, “I’m disgusted and outraged. It frankly sickens me. Trinity have moved with the times and moved on from our rivalry. Bailliol palpably have not.”

“There’s the banter of college rivalry – and then there’s taking it too far. They’re so far past the line, they can’t even see the line!” stated another Trinity student, Fay Lomas.