Wednesday 19th November 2025
Blog Page 2066

Review: Crave

0

Director Chris Jones takes on a daunting task with Crave. Sarah Kane’s penultimate play takes place in one act with characters neither explicitly connected nor distinct from each other. To those unfamiliar with Sarah Kane, her brief career and untimely suicide left behind some of the most controversial pieces of theatre of the time. Crave came as Kane’s first non-violent piece of theatre, written with little in the way of stage direction or setting; characters become as unspecific as possible, each with only a letter to denote them.

In the unlikely setting of St Hugh’s newly refurbished bar, low ceilings and dim lighting are enclosed by large pillars and small windows; the small table lamps dotted around the set creating a striking up-lighting effect on the actors’ faces, as jagged shadows exaggerate the sorrow on their faces. The intimacy of the space naturally draws the audience in, and eye contact afforded by the actors with the audience further removes any sense of the fourth wall. These characters are not explicitly connected and their strong use of the middle distance in speech retains the sense that, even when they talk to each other, they remain their own islands of sorrow.

There is sometimes an unfortunate lack of tightness in the script, particularly given that this play demands much well directed bouncing of words and phrases from one character to another. Such aspects of the play that require strong, well-rehearsed conviction, such as the compelling refrain, “Why?”, “What?”, “Why What?”, “What?”, sometimes lack potency. M’s (Olivia Madin) indignant character is well portrayed, however, throwing sardonic glances which belie her situation, exploding in the occasional fit of indignant rage; a welcome contrast to C’s (Rosie Wells) hand-wringing desolation.

Three Stars

Crave is on at St. Hugh’s College Bar, 5th Week, 7.30pm

Review: Vinegar Tom

0

With impressive performances all round, particularly from Margherita Philipp and Emile Halpin, Carol Churchill’s Vinegar Tom is a bold and powerful feminist perspective of the sixteenth century witch trials in Britain. As hysteria takes hold the women of a small village are, one after another, accused, tortured and executed at the hands of a male witch finder (Halpin) and his all too gleeful assistant. From the outset Churchill’s message, under the direction of Sarah McCready, is made emphatically clear as ‘Man’ (Halpin, in the most stirring of his three roles) declares “I am the Devil” and, after satisfying his own desires leaves a desperate Alice (Philipp), scrambling for his name.

Certainly not for the faint of heart, the production might prove over-confrontational for some. The ‘examinations’ of the witch finder, conducted on bloodstained sheets are frequent, brutal and make for purposefully uncomfortable viewing. The use of pointed sticks as the instruments of this torture serving as an all too blatant reminder of Churchill’s agenda..

George Feld and Aidan Clifford, as ‘Sprenger and Kramer’, authors of The Malleus Maleficarum witch-hunter’s manual, have enjoyable chemistry, and their poetic diatribe provides a little light relief alongside the traumas of the main play. Although, even this is short-lived, as their tone soon sours and they are interrupted by the modern-dress chorus. The chorus themselves effectively dominant the stage during their scenes, working successfully as a unit. 

The male dominant society of the 1500s is made abundantly clear, although I fear the original 1970s preformance, which used choral settings to translate this impression, was perhaps more convincing, and indeed more necessary.

So long as the audience is prepared for what the play is about, and for the message it delivers with every line, they will undoubtedly be impressed. The staging is simple but effective, the direction smart and mature, and the acting is largely striking. I would suggest that a visit be carefully considered, and may not appeal to many. Go to be provoked rather than entertained, for this is a performance of extremes.

Four stars

Vinegar Tom is at the Wadham Moser, 16-20 February, 7.30pm

 

Review: The Philanthropist

0

The Philanthropist opens with a familiar scene. A jittery John (Tom Moyser) is interrogated by his two straight-faced tutors, with a startling conclusion that makes those apocryphal horror stories of the infamous ‘Oxbridge interview’ sound like child’s play. Indeed, there is something playfully close to home about this satirical portrayal of the insular academic life of the pretentious and decadent literary set.

Perhaps this is what turns a script that could potentially have been arcane and difficult – Christopher Hampton’s play being both a self-professed ‘bourgeois comedy’ and a response to a seventeenth century comedy of manners – into a thoroughly enjoyable and accessible play, though no doubt the very quality of performances, writing and comedy also have their roles to play.

If it all sounds a bit serious, it isn’t. This is a play that balances cruel wit and black humour, with prodding satire and situation comedy. Jonathon Swinard is outstanding as the fumbling, socially inept professor of Philology Philip, while Dave Ralf is brilliantly detestable as the gaudy author Braham, though it could be said that his performance is more convincing during his high-flown rambles than his angry outbursts. Sam Buchdahl’s subtle portrayal of the despondent Don is also a highlight. It has to be said though that this is a play that thrives on the dynamics of the group – the banter is fast, fluid and punning – and no one seems to let the side down. Perhaps the staging could have been more imaginative, though the energy of the cast does compensate for this.

Overall, this is a very mature, funny and professional adaptation of a very suave play. Whether your interests lie in sex, scandal or social commentary, his play has it all and is well worth going to see.

Four Stars

The Philanthropist is on at the Burton Taylor Studio, 5th Week, Tuesday to Saturday, 7.30pm

Review: The Aphorist

0

The Aphorist, is a student written and performed play revolving around the deluded, miserable Harry (Matthew Monaghan), his suffocatingly pretentious friend Rudolph (Felix Legge) and Rudolph’s adoring girlfriend Cynthia (Agnes Meath Baker). The play charts the gradual emergence of the repressed feelings of Harry towards both Rudolph and Cynthia through Rudolph’s efforts to bring Harry along to one of his ‘shows’.

The character of Harry, at first glance, seems to invite a somewhat pitying empathy. Both the author and the actor do a fine job in creating a character that oozes resentment and a feeling of bitter under-appreciation. Yet there was a slightly disappointing lack of development. As a result, some of the dialogues later in the play were held back by the somewhat one dimensional nature of both the expression and the character. There are, after all, only so many ways of saying a resentful ‘no’.

While this problem did also feature in the portrayal of the other characters, this is one of the inevitable side effects of roles that are, in many ways, caricatures, and did not matter so much in the less pivotal roles. Other than this, however, the acting was rather good, especially the efforts of Felix Legge as Rudolph.

There may well be flaws in this production, but it is important to bear in mind that this play is the first attempt of a previously untried student writer. There is, after all, much to be commended; the dialogue, for the most part was well crafted, and largely devoid of the clumsy or incongruous lines that one might expect to crop up in a production of this nature. In addition to this, parts of the play are genuinely funny. It may not have had me choking on the floor, and the tendency to pander to the student predilection for incongruous swearing or absurd melodrama may not have been entirely absent, but there is a healthy dose of more subtle and well thought out comedy which is rather rare.

All in all, there is certainly plenty of potential on display here, both in the acting and in the writing, and I look forward to seeing strengths built upon by all members of the production in the final performance.

Three stars

The Aphorist is at the Burton Taylor Studio, 5th week, Tues-Sat, 9.30pm

Eyecandy: A Man’s World

0

Alex Sheppard, Wadham

Alex’s Fashion Statement: I don’t really think about fashion deeply, but I don’t want to blend in – I like standing out. It’s often part of who you are. If you spend the money, you should spend it on something you like. It’s all about your interests.

A realm often left to the catwalks and shows of Paris and Milan, men’s fashion has often lacked in the enthusiasm and glamour that womenswear brings. Yet with icons such as Tom Ford – model, designer and a very good-looking man – proves that you can have it all – and always in style. From choosing a well-tailored coat to a scuffed pair of military boots, the stereotypical outfit of hoodie-jeans-trainers can be left for those ‘essay-crisis’ days spent in the library. Instead, branch out – from Topman to Zara Men, a bit of knitwear (particularly striped nu

mbers) can go a long way, whilst well-placed accessories such as watches and scarves can add an eclectic feel to any shirt/skinny jean combo.

Protests

0

I do love a good protest. It really spices up even a fairly pedestrian speech. So I was gratified to see that this week’s visit by the Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister, Daniel Ayalon, attracted the requisite complement of screaming protesters outside the gate. “Free Free Palestine, occupation is a crime”, they chanted, while Ayalon’s bodyguards stood impassively. Unfortunately there were only three or four protestors, and they all looked about fifteen, so they came across more comical than scary. The Sri Lankan protestors last year were much better.

For the Love of Film

0

Matt and Laurence review Disney’s new hand-drawn animation, The Princess and the Frog, and also Mel Gibson’s new thriller, Edge of Darkness.

And if that wasn’t enough, Laurence finally sings.

News Roundup: Fourth Week

The LMH fraudulent fresher’s coaching, state school students closing the gap in admissions and the safety bus… alongside some in-depth analysis of Fit College and Blind Date.

Out of Breath Podcasts: Lives of an Artist

0

What is this American actress trying to get across?

Performed by Anna Popplewell

Interview: Zoe Hallam

0

Name: Zoe Hallam

Course: PPE, St John’s, Second Year

Spare Time: Campaigner for Muscular Dystrophy

Zoe Hallam and I quickly establish that we have several important things in common: both disorganised second year PPEists, both have already racked up an impressive array of last minute all-night essays this term and both regularly indulge in our guilty love of Glee, the US TV series based on an all-singing all-dancing high school choir.

However, while I wile away my free hours checking spellings in Cherwell‘s charming offices, Hallam spends her time as regional ambassador for ‘Trailblazers’ the youth branch of the Muscular Dystrophy Campaign, planning campaigns, co-ordinating information gathering and presenting the findings to Parliament, where last December she delivered a speech for the 18 month anniversary of the campaign.

While the Muscular Dystrophy Campaign is heavily geared towards fund-raising, Trailblazers focuses on campaigning for issues relevant to the 14-25s, explains Hallam. Since its establishment in July 2008, the organisation has run three broad information gathering campaigns on Higher Education, transport and leisure activities, and are now in the process of using the information collected to tackle the specific problems raised and propose solutions.

I ask how she balances the workload attached to her role with Oxford-centred activities. ‘It’s busier during the campaigns’, says Hallam, ‘publicity work and dealing with the press takes up time, and it can be up to twenty-five hours a week, but I’m in a bit of a lull at the moment.’ She explains that, for her, the most important part of the campaign is getting organisations to think harder about the practical details of provisions for the disabled: there tends to be a ‘shallow conception’ of accessibility, where people think that installing a ramp is enough. Often, she says, organisations claim to be accessible, but in fact the facilities haven’t been tested or thought through properly.

The transport campaign revealed the cost implications for disabled travellers: in London, for example, the Tube is inaccessible for wheelchair users, and while taxis are expensive, subsidies are only available for those living inside London. Other problems include inadequate training for the correct use of ramps on public transport and the varied quality of staff assistance – Hallam smiles ironically as she points out that while train staff are often there to help with getting on at the start of the journey, ‘they sometimes forget you also need to get off’.

The main concern with Higher Education, says Hallam, is the difficulties associated with entering the clearing procedure for those with additional requirements. Checking the University you are going to has everything you need is a pain for everyone, but approaching the clearing process with a disability means you are ‘severely disadvantaged’, Hallam explains, ‘there is a lot of information to find out in such a short amount of time’. Hallam manned a Trailblazers helpline on A-Level results day to offer advice and guidance to those going through clearing.

Raising awareness and getting people to pay more attention to detail is a key element of the campaign, for many people with disabilities practical considerations mean that extra organisation and planning is required for every outing. In the café, she points out the difference little things can make. ‘The height of the counter when you want to get your change, the space between tables’, things owners often don’t think twice about.

Hallam is due to attend the Annual General Meeting of the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) in February, where she will consider the changes that companies have been making over the last year, and suggest improvements for the future. She emphasises the difference between the transport campaign and the investigation into leisure activities: Trailblazers can influence services by presenting their findings to bodies such as ATOC, but since most businesses are not accountable to a higher body, there is a limit to the direct impact the campaign can have. That the campaign can, however, encourage individuals to approach the organisations is important in itself, argues Hallam. ‘We want to give people the confidence to actually go out and talk to people about their concerns – part of what we do is supposed to be empowering.’