Tuesday 1st July 2025
Blog Page 2112

Review:The Wasp Factory

0

In a word, this book is vile. There is not a single sympathetic character in this entire parade of wretchedness. The protagonist is beyond redemption, his father is (in equal parts) abusive and distant, and his brother is an almost comically exaggerated arsonist lunatic. The only characters who display even a whisper of human decency are bit-parts, too undeveloped to display any real qualities, whether positive or negative. Half of them end up dead anyway, in a variety of inventive and unpleasant ways.

“It is malicious and degrading and painful. I enjoyed it immensely.”

Yes, The Wasp Factory is probably the most unpleasant novel I have ever read. It is a catalogue of sociopathy, violence, isolation, body-horror and fear. It is malicious and degrading and painful. I enjoyed it immensely. It’s like a road accident – horrible, but you just can’t resist staring.

Summarising the plot is difficult. The narrator, Frank, drags the reader through an account of his bizarre daily routine, revealing snippets of his personal history along the way. His terrifying brother and his appalling father make occasional appearances, leading to several violent and (quite literally) explosive confrontations. It has all the usual elements of a gore-porn thriller, but with two redeeming features – Frank’s complex personal mythology, and his dry, detached narration.

The mythology is fascinating, reminiscent of stereotypical voudon and Salem-style ‘witchcraft’ without falling into cliché. The eponymous Wasp Factory is particularly imaginative, if a bit mechanically implausible. Frank’s detachment is both disturbing and refreshing; disturbing because he is apparently unaffected by the horrible events of the story, refreshing because the reader is spared the rigmarole of angst-ridden self-reflection. Frank is under no moral illusions about what he is – moral considerations don’t occur to him at all. Frank is certainly not a sympathetic character, but it is difficult to think of him as evil. Broken, perhaps, but not evil.

So, should you give The Wasp Factory a try? I suppose it depends on the strength of your stomach. If you enjoyed Trainspotting or Silence of the Lambs, this book will provide a challenging and stimulating experience. If not, then consider this book’s final virtue – it’s quite short. Short enough to read between one essay and the next, and short enough to avoid permanent emotional scarring and/or nightmares.

Three stars.

 

Let the BNP appear on Question Time

0

If the BNP do receive an invitation from the BBC to appear on Question Time, they should be allowed to participate. By denying them the right to appear on the programme, we simply hand them ammunition by allowing them to portray themselves as victims who have had their democratic rights stripped away from them. You only have to look at You Tube clips of the group Unite Against Fascism (UAF) throwing eggs at Nick Griffin, to see comments by riled BNP supporters arguing that the UAF are hypocritical fascists. The cruel irony of all of this is that the BNP whose rights I defend would take away my rights in under a second if they came into power, merely because I do not fit into their warped and simplistic definition of ‘British’.

Fear seems to be the concern motivating those protesting against the BNP’s participation on Question Time. They are afraid that by allowing the BNP to appear on the esteemed political programme, they will be giving the party the respectable, political legitimacy it craves. They are afraid that by allowing the BNP to publicise their views on mainstream television, the party will gain valuable publicity and may attract more voters.  They’re wrong. A debate between the BNP and other political parties on Question Time would be one of the best ways to help defeat them and reveal to the public their ignorance and their policies which are rooted in racial prejudices.

“We cannot ignore the 6.2% of the electorate that voted for the BNP”

The BBC said it was considering inviting the BNP because the party “demonstrated evidence of electoral support at a national level”, following the election of two BNP candidates to the European Parliament. Whilst some voted for the BNP because they genuinely support their policies, for others it was a protest vote to express their frustration at being ignored by mainstream political parties. We cannot ignore the 6.2% of the electorate that voted for the BNP. There are issues such as immigration, which the public are worried about and which the government has failed to address. The BNP, on the other hand, have been willing to focus on these concerns. They have greedily feasted on the topic of immigration, exploiting and twisting it, while playing on the fears of local communities in order to gain support. It is time the government stopped ignoring these issues and started listening to the disillusioned and isolated sections of the public.

Let the BNP appear on Question Time, let them be questioned and challenged by politicians from other parties, by members of the audience and by no-nonsense David Dimbleby himself. But let other political parties also show the public that there are alternative, feasible solutions to problems such as immigration which aren’t fascist, brutal and unjust. Then let us see if that 6.2% of the electorate still believe that racist, inhumane and simplistic solutions such as sinking boats with illegal immigrants – a measure proposed by Nick Griffin himself in July – are going to solve complex matters such as immigration.

“There are those who have been duped by Mr Griffin’s flash suits and Cambridge university education”

Nick Griffin has managed to a large extent to transform the BNP’s thuggish image into that of a respectable party with a middle-class leadership that is concerned about protecting a white, indigenous Britain from the masses of non-white, non-indigenous pollutants. Whatever that means. Whilst I find it hard to believe that people are unaware of the racism and brutality that lie within BNP ranks, I have to accept that there are those who have been duped by Mr Griffin’s flash suits and Cambridge university education and who genuinely believe the BNP are trying to address Britain’s problems in an efficient and just way.

No one is naive enough to believe that Mr Griffin would waste his big BBC moment with expletives against ethnic minorities, revealing to the public the abhorrent racism of his party. He is clever enough to know that such language is better reserved for a BNP meeting in the local pub. There is the risk that for some viewers Mr Griffin may come across as an attentive man, who is sympathetic to their concerns and is willing to take action. However, I would be willing to take that chance. It is preferable for the BNP to voice their opinions in a debate such as Question Time, where there are members of other political parties and members of the audience to challenge these views, rather than have the BNP continually spread their bigotry in town halls, in pamphlets and on their websites, unopposed and unchallenged. It was with a chill down my spine that I watched the BBC documentary The Secret Agent, in which an undercover journalist infiltrated the BNP and revealed the shocking racism and the violent, racially motivated behaviour of party members. It is by putting the BNP in the spotlight and not allowing them to lurk unmonitored in town halls, in places like Bradford that the public is able to discover what the BNP really stands for.

Nick Griffin’s face on television isn’t something I particularly relish seeing on a Thursday evening as I curl up on the sofa with a mug of hot chocolate. However, the opportunity to see him confronted, challenged and probed on Question Time is something I very much look forward to.

 

The British Airports Authority must die

0

There is a rising but muted wave of opinion that the BAA, the organisation which runs British Airports, should be dismantled. A lot of people, with a lot of spreadsheets, point to mountains of statistical drudgery in favour of the move, and nobody really cares.

We should split up the BAA, but not for the reasons policy wonks suggest. If they want to figure out how to get the discerning British public onside, all they need to do watch some standup. If it’s bad enough, they should find someone making incredibly passé jokes about airport security nightmares.

There is a reason that these jokes are tired- because airport security nightmares happens all the f*cking time. As I write this, I have just emerged from one of them. I am on board a BA plane on the way to New York, and have just been molested by what can only be described as the airport Gestapo.

People often say that it’s a bad idea to say the word “bomb” in an airport. It may well be. What you don’t know is that there are three more words to add to the list: “This”, “is”, and “ridiculous”. At this point I am unclear as to whether it is the individual words which were verboten, or whether it was their consecutive juxtaposition that was an apparent threat to national security, (I used them one after the other you see…) but at any rate given my experiences I can only advise that you steer well clear.

Allow me to provide a little context. At the point we begin my little story, I had ostensibly cleared security, replaced my moccasins, and mused upon but then opted against spending ridiculous amounts of money on such airport essentials as slightly-nicer-headphones and underwater video cameras. Having reached the gate I was walking down the tunnelly thing onto the plane.

“Regardless of the obvious and unforgivable antisemitism, I was as cooperative as could be”

I was on the cusp of a stress free ingress to this not-quite-jumbo jet, when I was whisked aside for a random bag search. Being Jewish, I naturally made the tenuous assumption that I had been profiled. Still, regardless of the obvious and unforgivable antisemitism, I was as cooperative as could be, even offering my assistance in opening my needlessly compartmentalised backpack. Indeed, I was just warming up to my interrogator when I was struck with a demand that shook me to my core.

“Shoes off.”

Being a careful reader, you will of course remember that I had the pleasure of displaying my endlessly unattractive and mismatched collection of socks at an earlier juncture in the airport experience. However, in the naive hope that someone other than close friends and family has read this far, I can assume your ignorance of the following:

Despite an outward facade of being a competent adult human being, I am freakishly underequipped at tying shoelaces. Not only am I unable do it properly (thanks, Dad), I do it at a pace that makes glacial drift look like Usain Bolt genetically spliced with the Starship Enterprise. As such, I am not a big fan of public shoelace tying incidents, least of all when they are repeated and seemingly pointless. My internal monologue screamed, “For the love of God, not again!”. My external monologue, though more reserved, was infinitely more damaging.

The words bubbled forth, involuntary, almost a whisper: “This is ridiculous…”

Things escalated quickly – before I knew it I was being stood up and frisked angrily, as the until now perfectly amicable airport constabularian pointed, having whipped it out of my pocket, at a thing that was plainly and clearly my wallet, while asking such penetrative questions as: “What is this?!!”

“She had apparently taken considerable offense at my largely inaudible critique of the double shoes-off procedure”

This was where the real trouble began. My unsolicited masseur was accompanied by his supervisor, a stout and abrasive woman who for our purposes we shall call Sharon (Shazza to friends), and who was presently waddling over.

Shazza is that most rare breed of activist, an avid supporter of the precise nature and design of airport security protocols, regardless of the actual detail of whatever they are. As such, she had apparently taken considerable offense at my largely inaudible critique of the double shoes-off procedure. Not only that, but my actions had apparently constituted a personal insult to the gentleman still quizzically pawing at the strange leather foldy thing from my pocket. She wanted an apology.

I’ll supplement this with the fact that Shaz didn’t really like me anyway. I was doing my best pretentious airport wanker impression, and as such had happened upon her in full leather jacket/ray bans regalia. I was also refusing to apologise.

In response to my overall objectionable nature, Shaz decided it would be best to confiscate my passport and boarding pass, and said that unless I apologised I would be removed from the flight. As this was happening, shoes off, luggage out, scene caused, the rest of the passengers were proceeding on to the plane. The less charitable among them guffawed at me as they passed.

I attempted to mount some sort of defence: “I’ve got a right to say…” But Shaz, having spotted my unfortunately American passport, interrupted – “Maybe in America you do.” In my mind I add “bitch!” to the end of of that.

I feebly attempted to point out that I am actually a dual citizen, but she seemed unswayed by my claims of transnational human rights. I was clearly at least partly contaminated, and at any rate a real Brit would surely have shown more respect for airport procedure. I needed to be put in my place, filthy, complaining, semi-American that I was.

I asked to see the manager – there was apparently no one more senior in the entirety of Heathrow. I asked for her name – “You don’t need my name.” It was, fortunately, on her nametag.

“No one can do anything about it, least of all express slight frustration with procedure to the Pol Pot of gate B44”

When I eventually got onto the plane, I attempted to complain. The incredibly helpful and sympathetic staff said that this firstly happened all the time, and secondly was nothing to do with them. This brings me, tortuously, to my point. Though I was flying BA, the security staff were from the BAA, no relation. Of course, BA staff have to be sympathetic and helpful. If they aren’t, you’ll go fly with someone else. But good luck trying to get anywhere without passing through the clutches of the BAA. They run every major airport. As a result, their security procedures can be as annoying as they like, and no one can do anything about it, least of all express slight frustration with procedure to the Pol Pot of gate B44. That is, unless you feel like walking to New York.

It is this kind of monopoly situation that gives rise to a company in which employees, instead of responding to complaints, put down and threaten customers for making them. Can you imagine going to a restaurant, sending back a dish, and being imprisoned by the waiter until you apologised?

Add to the lack of competition the fact that BAA security officials are in a position of power, often have to perform repetitive work, and that people are very

keen not to be booted off of their flight, and you have a recipe for a legion of petty tyrants who can harass anyone that they don’t like the look of.

Thus, my conclusion: The BAA should be dismantled, so that I can make remarks under my breath while being forced to take off my shoes for the nth time, and then proceed onto my flight unhindered by Sharon and her shadowy cabal of Heathrow Hitlers.

Point made, but I hear you cry, “How did you get on to the plane?!”

I would love to say that I about faced and sprinted into the plane, Shazza hanging on to my ankle as I boarded barefoot, finally free of those damn shoes and their embarassing foibles, but no. Of course, being spineless, I gave up and apologised, and walked on with my tail between my legs, resolving to write a pithy article about it on the flight.

Musical Expeditions: Bluegrass in Upstate New York

0

“Old Forge is a sad end of the road for most of its visitors”

Two hours of driving separate Old Forge, where I was, from North Creek, where I wanted to be. Both places are in the Adirondack Park – a vast area of lakes and wooded mountains in Upstate New York – but apart from that they have nothing in common. Old Forge, though once a spring pad for adventures, is now the crazy golf capital of the universe and sad end of the road for most of its visitors. North Creek, on the other hand, is a remote little hamlet right in the depths of the Adirondack Mountains, which plays host every year to the Upper Hudson Bluegrass Festival. As I had no other way of getting there, I had to try and hitch a lift.

I set up in Old Forge some time in the morning, on the road heading northwards out of town. In my hand I was clasping a bit of cardboard that read BLUE GRASS on one side, and UPPER HUDSON on the other – both sides absolutely useless, I later realised, because Upper Hudson is not a place but a vast area, and no-one down in Old Forge was ever likely to have heard of the bluegrass festival.

Luckily, before long, chance had it that I found myself preparing a new sign, which would be inscribed NORTH CREEK – a name I knew I’d heard in connection with the festival, but I wasn’t sure if it was the actual location, or the nearest place, or a town on the way.

Fifteen minutes or less after I first set up, a little white police car came snaking along. I wasn’t sure if I was breaking the law or not by hitchhiking, and I could have just stood there to find out – to see if it stopped by me or carried on along its way. But it suddenly seemed like the best idea would be to stick the old sign under my arm and casually set out across the road, as if I wasn’t hitchhiking at all. While I was doing so, stepping out onto the zebra crossing which happened to be right in front of me, I noticed that behind the first police car there was another one, a big State Trooper vehicle, creeping along, ominous as can be. Just as I was making it across, they pulled over to my side of the road, and stopped in a lay-by a little further along the road from me. It was pretty clear by now that they had come along with regards to myself, but it seemed too late to go and discuss the situation with them.

Next thing, another of these State Trooper beasts pitched up. I was walking along the pavement by this time, with the other police cars behind me, and just happened to be coming up to a spot where the road cut in for a lay-by or a parking lot or something. This meant that the police car could pull in and give the guys inside a good close look at me. I had made it to this spot just before them, and it was my right of way anyway, so I crossed just as they were turning in, giving myself a nice opportunity to show them how casual I was feeling about the whole thing. I gave a nod of thanks – as if they’d invited me to cross – turned away, and carried on ambling down the street.

The obscurity of my sign, along with my carefree air, seemed to have done the trick, as none of them turned to follow me. I’d have thought that even the slightest glimpse of my sign – which wasn’t by the way well-hidden in the least – would have confirmed I was a hitchhiker and earned me at least a chat with the cops. At any rate, it occurred to me I might go and buy a bottle of water at a nearby ice-cream shop, while the situation calmed down.

Even though it was only just past breakfast-time, the queue for ice-creams was enormous, which was ideal for me, as it gave the cops a good while in which to clear off.

Some time later, water in hand, I headed back to the spot where I’d been before. The cops were nowhere to be seen by now, but I felt somewhat apprehensive anyway, and wasn’t quite ready to start thumbing down a lift again. So I thought I’d slump down on the ground and scribble myself a new sign, just to kill some more time. I happened to decide I’d label this one NORTH CREEK, for a bit of variety.

When it was done, I though it looked pretty good – a good clear sign. So I decided I’d use it, the North Creek one, in combination with the bluegrass one. This time I thought I’d lean them up, rather than hold them, and plant myself down by their side. I also thought I’d pick up the book I was reading, in the first place to stave off boredom; secondly because it was Nineteen Eighty-Four and seemed an apt thing to be reading while being hawked by police; and lastly because I thought it might make me look like an appealing guy to pick up.

 

“I sat there for nearly an hour, the police car never budged”

 

I’d only been there about five minutes when there showed up a police truck again, this one different from the earlier ones. It was semi-disguised, the only thing that gave it away for a police truck being the blue light on its roof. Otherwise it was just a big grey four-by-four with a trailer. It pulled in and parked itself right opposite me, in that same old lay-by/parking lot thing. I decided I’d stay put this time, because I couldn’t be bothered with the whole ice-cream shop business again, and if I kept doing stuff like that, I’d probably end up missing most the festival. I didn’t much look like a hitchhiker by now anyway, what with my book out and being seated and everything.

I sat there for pretty nearly an hour, with the police car never budging an inch. Round about then I decided it probably wasn’t a good spot, so I wandered on in the out-of-town direction, and soon set myself up on a corner where no car could miss me. I was directly visible for a good two hundred yards and there was a place a little way beyond me ideal for cars stop at.

A good half of an hour went by and I was beginning to lose hope, but just then an old lumberjack called Morse came by. He asked me where I wanted to go – North Creek way, I said – and told me to jump in.

At first he seemed somewhat cold, not chatty in the least, as though he regretted stopping for me. After a while, though, he struck up a sort of conversation: ‘You sure lucked out… me comin’ along,’ he said.

‘Yes, sir,’ I told him. ‘I believe I did.’

There was a bit of a pause, and then he said: ‘Almost didn’t come by this way.’ He wanted me to thank him again, I think.

‘Well I’m glad you did – thanks so much,’ I said. ‘I was thinking of giving up and going home.’

After another short while he spoke again: ‘Folks don’t generally like giving lifts these days.’

‘Yeah, why is that?’

‘In case they get mugged, which happens.’ The way he said it, and looked at me when he said ‘happens’, it was like a threat, as if really what he was saying was: ‘I know your game – don’t even think about it.’

Well, after that, bit by bit he lightened up, and it turned out he was pretty good company this sixty-something or so lumberjack.

And so we drove on, and two hours later stopped by a sign at the roadside pointing up a lane to the Upper Hudson Bluegrass Festival. I paid my respects to old Morse, shuffled out the car, and set my course for the music.

 

“You could tell it was a family up there, the way they grinned at each other”

 

When I finally arrived at the festival, it was the Atkinson Family up on stage. They’re a five-piece band, but there was only one microphone to pick up not just the singing but all the instruments as well. So they all had to huddle round it, and each time one of them did a solo, he had to muscle in to the front so that he’d be nearest the microphone.

You could tell it was a family up there, the way they grinned at each other now and then while they played, and then the way they chatted to the audience between songs, finishing each other’s sentences, and correcting each other, and dropping in the occasional family joke and stuff like that. You could also tell that the audience thought this was great. Some of them even joined in the Atkinsons’ conversations.

I understood all this better later on, when Mrs Atkinson explained to me that bluegrass festivals were like huge family reunions – everyone’s family in the bluegrass world – everyone knows everyone else, more or less. Plus, everyone’s welcome, it seemed. As I was new to it all, I had countless people approach me, call me ‘kiddo’ or ‘son’, and strike up some kind of innocent conversation, just to make me feel welcome there.

As for the music, not just the Atkinson Family but all of it, the sound was very traditional, and not because they were all playing covers. There were some covers – ‘bluegrassed’ versions of Johnny Cash songs, Hank Williams songs, Woody Guthrie songs, Jimmie Rodgers songs, and stuff like that – but mostly they played originals, and even these sounded like they could have been written fifty years ago. That’s the particular thing about bluegrass, it doesn’t change much. It prides itself on sticking to its roots, as Mrs Atkinson explained to me later on.

 

“They call it bluegrass etiquette”

 

It’s an American music, she told me, which came about initially by the merger of three different types of music: Irish fiddle music, black gospel, and mountain-people folk. The father of the genre was a man called Bill Munro, the founding member of the Blue Grass Boys, which he formed in 1938, naming them after his home state of Kentucky, also known as the ‘Bluegrass State’ and still the bluegrass capital. Bluegrass is easily mistakable with regular country music, of which it’s a sub-genre, but the two styles are distinct, if you know what to look for, and a lot of bluegrass fans look down on regular country as less authentic. Bluegrass is more up-tempo, and generally has more virtuoso musicianship; it’s meant to be played only on acoustic instruments. Plus, the songs are about different things from country. In country you mostly just get ballads, while in bluegrass there’s a mixture of three main types: Train songs, killing songs, and gospel songs. Gospel is a big part of it.

Another big part of it, which goes along with the gospel-side of the music, is a general American wholesomeness. Everyone’s always jolly, cracking jokes, offering you a seat if you need one, and smiling at you whenever possible – ‘bluegrass etiquette’ they call it.

I wasn’t sure if this wholesomeness sprung from the fact that most the people at the festival were getting on a bit – grandparent-age at least – but a hip-looking guy in a baseball cap called Daryl assured me that at other bluegrass festivals you see more young people, and the etiquette and the whole thing remains just the same.

This same Daryl also told me that people stay up all night at bluegrass festivals, playing bluegrass non-stop, even the elderly ones – because bluegrass is like a drug when you’re playing, he said. And the people who come to watch at bluegrass festivals are mostly accomplished musicians themselves, so everyone keeps on playing together all night long. One reason you get so many old people at bluegrass festivals, Daryl said, was that people who like bluegrass just go on living. As they’ve got bluegrass for a drug, they don’t need to put any harmful stuff into their bodies, so they just keep going.

 

“Listening to the music on CD at home is one thing”

I didn’t stick around to see what Daryl was talking about, because he’d also said that if it rained people wouldn’t stay up anyway, because the instruments can’t stay in tune in the rain. It was raining quite a bit and the sky looked grim; the light was fading, and I didn’t particularly feel like spending the night with a whole bunch of mosquitoes under a sky that wouldn’t even have any stars because of the rain; I also felt like I’d almost seen enough of this festival, and wasn’t particularly minded to stay for day two; so I headed back to the road, leaving just as I had arrived, with the Atkinson Family up on stage again (all bands return to the stage for a second set).

Catching a lift home was a piece of cake compared with my outward journey. I was picked up almost immediately by a young couple coming up to the Adirondacks for the weekend from Albany, the capital of New York State. One of them was an architect, the other an engineer, and getting in the car with them was really like returning to normal life. The folks there couldn’t have been nicer, but it was really quite a culture shock, the bluegrass festival. Listening to the music on CD at home is one thing; bumbling around among the actual people is something else.

 

Review: Inglorious Basterds

0

I have seen no less than eight people walk out of this film. They ranged from an elderly couple, tottering out as the first scalp is sliced off, to a group of young people who slinked out muttering something about “fucking French”. This is certainly not your average summer blockbuster. It’s talky, wincingly violent, and a little complicated, all of which are qualities which could drive restless audience members to vacate their paid-for seat. They’re also the qualities which make Inglourious Basterds two and three quarter hours of unmitigated cinematic joy. Quentin Tarantino has produced a hilarious, magnificently accomplished masterpiece, tossing around and tearing apart conventions like a playful monkey to craft the funniest, most frightening and thought-provoking film of the year.

The basic idea is a war film with Spaghetti Western elements. Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) is tasked with leading a group of Jewish-American soldiers, the eponymous Basterds, into Nazi-occupied France to, as he so wonderfully puts it, inflict “murder, torture, intimation, and terror” on the men who did the same to the European countries they occupy. Meanwhile, the utterly terrifying Col. Hans Landa (Christopher Waltz) hunts Jews with charming, monstrous precision, whilst Shoshanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent), a girl he let escape for his own amusement, plots to inc

inerate the Nazi high command. Every single performance from this stunning international ensemble cast is a pleasure to watch. All their accents and mannerisms are played up for some truly hysterical moments of comedy – the British characters are especially amusing, along with Pitt’s tight-lipped “Bonjourno” – without ever becoming overly ridiculous.

As well as the ever-flowing comedic moments, Basterds offers some heart-stoppingly tense moments of suspense constructed around the unpredictability of the smooth-talking, subtly aggressive and intense Nazi officers. The film is similarly visually stunning. Brief spurts of action are a treat for the eyes, and all are managed without a hint of CGI, which led to two of the stars nearly becoming cremated during a particularly ambitious scene. The wry, winking iconography Tarantino scatters throughout also deserves special mention. Look out for the looming black poodle sternly criticizing Goebbels’ (Sylvester Groth) guffawing racism, Landa’s emasculating Swiss style horn-pipe, and Major Dieter Hellstrom’s (August Diehl) fantastic cowboy boot shaped pint glass, coming to wreck havoc on the Apache Basterds.

For a film so colourfully ostentatious, Basterds is a film imbued with great amounts of depth and subtlety.  Essentially, this is a film about the audience. We see Hitler laugh hysterically at the Americans being slaughtered in the film-within-a-film Nation’s Pride, and our natural instinct is repulsion – but it quickly dawns upon us that laughing at nasty, painful death is exactly how we’ve spent the last two hours. Having the twentieth century’s ultimate figure of evil indulging in the same edgy delights as our good selves might send a ripple of unease over an audience which laughed heartily at the Bear Jew (a surprisingly accomplished Eli Roth) clobber a Nazi soldier to death whilst yelling baseball conventions. Just like Roth’s own Hostel, we find ourselves forced to question why we find the violence so entertaining.

The phrase ‘kosher porn’ has been tossed around by some reviewers to describe the visceral, vengeful joy the film provides. These certainly aren’t the Jewish characters you tend to see in more conventional war films. Their gleeful, effervescently comic brutality makes the Nazis the victims, inverting preconceptions of the place of Jewish figures in war films by making them figures of absolute power rather than desperate resisters. It’s actually their Nazi victims that seem to elicit glimmers of sympathy rather than our heroes. We’re given very little background on the Basterds themselves, whilst their scalped, carved and shot targets talk of defending their people, hugging their mothers and seeing their children grow up.

I could write about this film for so much longer. There is so much to praise, so much to talk about. It is Tarantino’s unrivalled magnum opus, a film which defies all expectations and the potential to change war films forever. Please, ignore the ignorant negative and lukewarm reviews floating around. If you enjoy cinema, go and see this film.

 

Education: The failure to measure success

0

This week the British education system delivered yet another record haul. It’s the 27th year in a row that A level results have improved. At the current rate of progress, 100% of school leavers will have an A before the century is out. Celebration meets with cynicism. But apart from scoffing at this specious success, the stats confirm two facts. Firstly, A levels are failing to offer a reliable indication for admissions tutors. And secondly, with 50% of private schools’ grades being A compared with 20% of comprehensives’, education suffers from great disparity.

What is to be done? Firstly, Britain needs to be able to refute accusations of ‘dumming down’ at all levels. It is implausible that every year leaves the one before eating its dust. Even Usain Bolt clocks up some slightly slower times between world records. If twice as many graduates leave with firsts as a decade ago, somehow this must mean firsts are getting easier. Even if genuine improvements are being made, they are being effaced by an obsession to make the numbers look good whatever the cost. Tables beyond our control such as the UN’s education index put Britain in 28th place globally and show falling standards. If you need more convincing that higher scores are being achieved by shifting the goal posts then take a look at the exam regs for your degree from the 50s. Thought it couldn’t be any harder than it is now? Think again.

But even if being more realistic about how well people are doing stems the dubious tide of success, the top grade at A level is still going to be too overcrowded for the most competitive universities to see what’s going on. There is a big shift in ability between someone scraping an A and someone scoring full marks. Next year’s A* (for those scoring 90%) won’t help as it is only awarded for A2 not for AS – i.e. after offers have been made. Besides, it won’t be long till we’ll need to add another star.

There wasn’t always this problem – from 1963-84, A grades were reserved for the top 10% of performers. Grades showed not how much of the syllabus you had mastered, but how well you competed. We shouldn’t return to this since it is useful to know what proportion of the syllabus’ criteria have been met. But we can easily restore the competitive factor by another means. Let’s introduce a percentile score alongside the grade to show where candidates rank in the field. Standards will rise as candidates won’t be able relax, confident they’re on track for the middle of a big cushy grade span but have to push themselves to gain every point on the 100 rung ladder. That way everyone can get an A*** or first for politicians to brag about without making the whole exercise useless for admissions and employers.

But although we’ve worked out how to tell how well people have done in exams, we haven’t ended an admissions tutor’s troubles. Now we bring out our second set of alarming statistics showing that, as a group, people who have their education paid for are at an immense advantage. Not only do they do much better at GCSE and A level, but also, although comprising just 7% of the school population, they make up around half of Oxford’s domestic intake. Later in life the advantages keep rolling in – 75% of judges went to private school.

Now, I am the last to stand up in favour of positive discrimination. It would be divisive and detrimental to the deserving. But top universities should be looking to admit the brightest and the best and that’s not necessarily the same as those scoring the top A levels. If someone’s done well because they’ve had easy access to much better resources, smaller classes and been able to afford additional exam-focused, spoon-feeding tuition then this isn’t as impressive as someone who’s achieved the same without any of that.

What the Russell Group should be looking for are those with the greatest potential. This shouldn’t be measured by the current aptitude tests – it’s too easy to improve through coaching, once more the domain of the privileged. Instead, admissions tutors should have much more access to the context of a candidate’s achievement. The more relevant – and it must be relevant – background information they have, the more accurate this process will be. How well someone has done in relation to others who share their situation is a good indication of how well they are likely to do once the field is levelled.

Once we know what place people have finished in as well as who their real rivals were, then we can find out who the real successes are.

Merton tops Norrington Table

0

Merton College has the best Norrington score at Oxford for the third year running.

Merton’s warden, Dame Jessica Rawson, put it down to “a culture of academic excitement and commitment” adding, “while in any one year the Norrington table is not of huge importance, consistent performance over a period of time is significant.”

The Norrington table, the University’s official list of undergraduate colleges ranked by academic performance, scores colleges according to the classifications of undergraduate degrees awarded that year.

Harris Manchester College, which had managed to climb five places in the preceding year, dropped once again to last place amongst the Oxford undergraduate colleges. The college has been last since the scoring system was made official by the University in 2005.

Magdalen achieved the highest proportion of firsts in its 550-year history, with 43 out of 101 students in the top category. They came third on the list, beaten by a mere 0.26% by St. John’s.

The Norrington table is regularly criticised for being a poor ranking system. The small numbers of students per college can result in surprising inconsistency from year to year. Furthermore, unlike Cambridge’s Tompkin’s Table, it is not adjusted to take account of subjects which offer a higher proportion of first class degrees, such as Mathematics.

Many students don’t take the table seriously. One fourth year at Pembroke said, “Of course people look at the Norrington table but I think most people take it with a pinch of salt; academic achievements aren’t the only measure of success.”

However, since the University made the table official, interest in the annual lists has been intensifying amongst the colleges and in the media.

As Magdalen President, Professor David Clary, admitted, “The Norrington table, for all its faults, is looked at carefully by many dons in Oxford who like to see their college doing well in the table.”

Wadham’s Warden, Sir Neil Chalmers emphasised that the scoring was not a priority for the college, who ranked 9th on the list. While he considers the Norrington table “useful background information… the reputation we have from students who are here now is more important.”

Indeed, there is little evidence the scores have any effect on applicants choosing colleges.

One student applying to Oxford said, “I did notice the Norrington table but I was more interested in the culture of the college and the kinds of people who were there.”

Norrington Table Rankings for Academic Year 2008/9:

1. Merton
2. St John’s
3. Magdalen
4. Corpus Christi
5. New
6. Hertford
7. University
8. Lincoln
9. Wadham
10. Queen’s
11. Trinity
12. Keble
13. Christ Church
14. Balliol
15. Worcester
16. Jesus
17. St Catherine’s
18. Exeter
19. Somerville
20. St Anne’s
21. Oriel
22. Lady Margaret Hall
23. St Hugh’s
24. Pembroke
25. St Peter’s
26. Brasenose
27. St Edmund Hall
28. Mansfield
29. St Hilda’s
30. Harris Manchester

 

Tariq Ramadan sacked for hosting Iranian TV show

0

Oxford’s recently appointed Chair of Islamic Studies, Professor Tariq Ramadan, has been dismissed from his positions at Erasmus University Rotterdam and as an advisor on ethnic integration to the city of Rotterdam.

The dismissals follow Ramadan’s decision to host a show on the Iranian channel Press TV. In a joint statement issued by the University and the city of Rotterdam, concern was expressed at the indirect association of Ramadan with Iran’s “repressive regime.” Ramadan’s involvement was judged to be “irreconcilable” with the two positions in the Netherlands.

Oxford University commented on the situation, “Freedom of speech is a fundamental right respected by the University.”

“Professor Ramadan’s views are entirely his own and do not represent the views of the University. However, the University does not in any way curtail the freedom of its academic staff to appear and express their opinions in the media.”

In response to his dismissal, Professor Ramadan has argued that in appearing on the channel he has chosen “the path of critical debate.”

Ramadan takes up his position at Oxford this September.

 

Proctors punish OUCA after racism scandal

0

The proctors have announced that the Oxford University Conservative Association (OUCA) will no longer hold the right to use the University’s name in its title and will not be allowed a stall at this year’s Fresher’s Fair.

The decision to remove these privileges comes as a response to allegations that members of the organisation encouraged and partook in the telling of racist jokes at hustings last term.

OUCA was the focus of national media attention after the events were reported in Cherwell. The members involved in the controversy have since resigned from the Association.

Anthony Bouthall, President at the time, defended the organisation after the scandal. “I cannot reiterate strongly enough that OUCA has no place for racism, and abhors and rejects all racial prejudice,” he said.

Ben Lyons, co-chair of the Oxford University Labour Club, welcomed the decision. “We could have the Oxford University Thatcher Appreciation Society or the Oxford University Let’s-Pretend-We’re-Victorian Club but there’s no place for the Oxford University Bigots.”

In a statement released by the press office the University emphasised its commitment to equality and good race relations, pointing out that the events in question “do not reflect the way the overwhelming majority of our students think or behave,” adding, “The University strongly condemns any form of racism and discrimination.”

 

Police patrols increase after a series of Oxford thefts

0

Oxford police have been heavily engaged in efforts to ensure the safety of those studying at language schools in the city.

‘Operation Buzzard’ involves officers making high-visibility patrols on the Blackbird Leys estate. Foreign students and young tourists have been targeted by thieves in recent months, with ten robberies recorded since the beginning of July.

One language school has now stopped sending female students to the estate. Shaena Whitney, accommodation and welfare officer for the Oxford Language Centre commented, “We don’t use Blackbird Leys very much now and I would certainly not put the young girls out there because they just don’t feel comfortable when they get off the bus.”

Ana Vucetic, also a law student, expressed similar concerns, “There are noticeably fewer police than I’m used to seeing [in America], particularly in places and at times where their attendance would be comforting, such as outside clubs on Friday nights.”

In response, two ‘safe havens’ for students have been established, one at The Ozone Bowlplex and another at Blackbird Leys Leisure Centre. Students can seek help there if they are feeling unsafe.

Ben Oakley-Rowland, Assistant Manager of the Leisure Centre confirmed that they have agreed to “allow [foreign students] to use telephones et cetera to make contact with relevant parties.” 

He added, “To my knowledge we have had not had to offer our services as a safe haven.”

Neighbourhood Sgt Rob Axe commented, “The neighbourhood team will continue to carry out high visibility patrols throughout August, along with officers who have been dedicated to the operation, Thames Valley Police Mounted Section and Oxford City Council Street Wardens.”

Martin Ström, a Swedish second-year lawyer at St Anne’s College, suggested improvements to policing could be a solution, remarking, “the police could be more visible to make their presence more apparent.”

Det. Sgt. Steve Raffield, of Oxford’s Robbery Team said, “I would like to send a warning to those people who choose to commit robberies in Blackbird Leys – we will identify who you are and you will be arrested.

“I would urge anyone walking in Blackbird Leys in the evening to take extra care and be vigilant of what is happening around them.”