Monday 7th July 2025
Blog Page 2126

Colouring Outside the Lines

0

There is much more to a children’s book than cute pictures and pat morals. The narrative must be recognizable but fresh, the obstacles formidable but comprehensible. Moreover, with an audience that’s just beginning to pair words and images, picture book prose must resonate with young minds while meshing with evocative, imaginative art that recalls the landscapes of life in childhood and beyond while endowing them with something intangibly fantastic.

Creating a classic picture book is a task that requires attention to detail: to the smiles, frowns and leaps of children; to the drama of the everyday as seen from a non-adult perspective; and to the delicate and subtle feelings of tiny protagonists. It is a task which Shirley Hughes has accomplished many times over.

Hughes is the author and illustrator of the much-beloved children’s books Dogger and the Alfie series. Educated at the Liverpool School of Art and Oxford’s own Ruskin School, Hughes began her lifelong career illustrating projects including Noel Streatfield’s The Bell Family and children’s classic My Naughty Little Sister. Her first solo work, Lucy and Tom, was published in 1960, and she has since been the creative drive behind a world of memorable story-books.She has been applauded for her work on numerous occasions-receiving the Kate Greenaway Medal for Dogger, the Eleanor Farjeon Award for Services to Children’s Literature, and The Other Award. In 1998 Hughes also received an OBE for Services to Children’s Literature. Hughes’ latest book, the graphic novel Bye, Bye Birdie, came out last month.

When asked about Dogger and the Alfie books, Hughes claims that she never expected them to become staples of children’s literature. ‘I was amazed when I got into print, all those years ago. I was then in England, and I was told I wouldn’t be acceptable abroad. They said, this is all very well Shirley, but you’re too English! It just shows, you can’t predict what’s going to be a success and what isn’t!’

Discernible character-types and themes run through Hughes’ work. In particular there is the lost boy. Just look at Hughes’ retelling of Peter Pan (1976) and in The Lion and the Unicorn (1998) to see what we mean. J.M. Barrie’s tale was apparently a joy to work on. ‘It’s a very strange story, and Barrie was a very strange man. But it is an absolute classic; it’s got everything-flying, piracy, fighting-so it’s a bull job to be offered.’

Hughes is frank about the personal aspect of the lost child character in her books. ‘I was a child in World War Two. Being evacuated was a very terrible experience for a lot of children-it happened to me. We had several evacuated children all around us from when the blitz on Liverpool began, so I wanted to do a story about that.’

Hughes doesn’t just want to channel her experiences through pictures and prose-she feels that her art can help children understand these experiences and branch out into other types of reading. ‘I also feel, very strongly, that picture books can be used as a springboard into poetry, into legend, and into much bigger ideas, like this idea of being sent away during the war. And children will go on from picture books to other fiction that connects with that.’
She doesn’t just illustrate her own work – she feels that bringing someone else’s words to life has an appeal all of its own. ‘Its such enormous fun to illustrate another person’s book. You have to let your imagination run riot on what they’ve written and give it a visual form,’ Hughes said. ‘Doing your own book, you’re in charge of the whole thing-you give yourself a story that you want to illustrate-whereas if you’re illustrating someone else’s book, you’re trying to inhabit their imagination. I illustrated some stories called My Naughty Little Sister, by Dorothy Edwards; I didn’t meet her beforehand. When I did eventually meet her, she said, did you know that this little girl you’ve drawn looks exactly like me at that age? It’s very funny how you catch on to things.’

Hughes’s newest book, the wildly experimental Bye, Bye Birdie, has been pitched as a graphic novel for adults. In the wordless novel, a dapper young man meets an attractive woman on the street. He courts her, wins her over, and takes her home-only to discover, when she removes her hat, that she has the face of a bird and the instincts of a predator. A chase through several dimensions ensues. In Bye, Bye Birdie, the silent film meets graphic novel horror at its best.

However, the author would rather not box it in. ‘I wouldn’t categorize it,’ said Hughes, ‘I just had this idea for a wordless story. But the idea, I suppose, of a little chap being relentlessly pursued by a predatory bird woman with a very sharp beak is very unnerving-especially to men, it seems. I don’t know that children would be particularly frightened by it. But my hero does manage to give her quite a run for her money, or rather a flight for her money. He is a true dandy, and he keeps on trying to survive. But he just cannot get away from her, you know?’

The novel and its format were inspired by the cartoons and choreographed dancing film greats of Hughes’ childhood. ‘I’ve been fascinated by strip cartoon all my life,’ said the author. ‘The very sophisticated strip cartoons came in when a lot of the American GIs came in to Liverpool, near where I was living, during World War Two. So I’ve always had strip cartoon as a form of storytelling in my mind. I just love doing it. As for the hero, he’s a sort of boulevardier. He’s halfway between Buster Keaton and Fred Astaire.’

The author-illustrator is returning to her picture book roots for her next work. As she describes it, ‘My next book is going back to the audience of the very young child. It’s called Don’t Want to Go, and it’s about a little girl and that terrible moment when Dad is sort of at his wits end, Mother has the flu, and Dad’s got to go to work.’ Apparently, the idea was a hit among new parents when Hughes presented the book to publishers. ‘When it was brought out at the acquisitions meeting at Random House, a lot of young mothers were on the staff, and said they’d been in that position.’

That is a reflection of Hughes’ talent for capturing parent-child interactions in words and images, a consistent strength that has made her beloved of children and adults alike. ‘I think picture books for the very young are what I was put on this earth to do, and will go on doing, with great pleasure,’ she said. ‘But I will keep doing lots of other exciting things as well, I hope.’

So does she intend to do more graphic novels for adults?
‘Yes, I do,’ said Hughes. ‘I’ve just got to get a good idea first.’

Uprooting the Family Tree

0

Oh the joys of the internet. More sites than you could possibly explore even in a grossly extended lifetime. So many: too many? That was how I felt when I decided to do a ‘quick’ online search for some information about family history.

Glaring back at me were 90 million sites which claimed they might be able to tell me something about my ancestry. How on earth was I to wade through this virtual sea of flashing advertisements, ‘read my success story’ case studies, and black and white pictures of desolate looking children in 19th century overalls? I took my chances with one particular site whose home page claimed in large blinking letters ‘WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE’. The next step on said website invited me to enter in my surname to help them in their search for my roots. Smith-that really narrows it down. Unsurprisingly, my brief flirtation with these few genealogy websites didn’t reveal any family scandals, aristocratic roots or illegitimate children, but my curiosity was not deterred.

In reality the results of my little investigation wouldn’t have produced anything that my family don’t already know. I am lucky enough to have a grandfather who has spent his thirty year retirement avidly researching our family history and has discovered some truly fascinating things in the process. His journey through the hundreds of archives, church records and registry offices began with the simple discovery of his grandfather’s death certificate and the realisation that the name had been printed incorrectly. From one piece of paper to thirty years of detailed research and discovery. Why? He seemed a little perplexed when I asked him. ‘It becomes a compulsion’ he said ‘the more you discover the more you want to know’.

Millions of people try to trace their roots every year. A recent poll by the market researchers Maritz has shown that the number of people researching their family history is up 45% from five years ago. What is even more staggering is that 35 million Americans said they had researched their family history on the internet- that’s nearly half of all American internet users.

Ok, so there is one big glaring question in all this: Why? What’s the big deal? The funny thing is, that it’s not just our own backgrounds that interest us, but those of others too. Take the BBC programme ‘Who do you think you are’- why did 6.3 million viewers care about the distant exploits of some incessantly annoying celebrities’ father’s mother’s father’s brother’s wife?

For me this is a big question. Is family history gripping because it gives you a sense of where you came from, or because researching it is just a bit of light entertainment? Does tell you something about who you are actually are, or is it just a collection of half interesting stories? Can it reveal anything about your inner character, explain your traits, make sense of your habits and shed light on the fundamental dynamics of the way your immediate family functions…or is it just a bit of fun?

Historically, of course, genealogy was hugely important in dictating who you were, your status in life and the way you were treated. It was so important that several Anglo Saxon Kings had their ancestry traced back to the God Woden – ambitious genealogical research indeed. In the Indian state of Bihir there is a written tradition of genealogical records among the Maithil Brahmins and Karna Kayasthas called ‘panjis’ which date back to the twelfth century CE. Even today these records are still consulted prior to marriage. But in our modern day society, the fundamental importance of your background has faded somewhat. Nothing your distant ancestors did will directly affect your own path; in reality they are people we have never known and never will know and most probably have little to nothing in common with. Despite all this it seems incredibly hard to tear your emotions away from what you discover.

Let me give you an example. In the process of research it was discovered that one of my great great (plus a few more greats) grandfathers was in the navy during the battle of Trafalgar. On closer research it came to light that this lieutenant John Smith (sadly not the same one that married Pocahontas) had pushed a man overboard. The man had died. Ridiculous as it may seem, I found myself making desperate excuses for this John Smith. Perhaps it was an accident, perhaps it was self defence, perhaps there was some terrible insult done to my ancestor, a previous murder maybe or an affair? Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps.

Having given it a huge amount of thought I still can’t work out why I so badly want to excuse him. Does what he did make me a murderer? Of course not. I’m just person who hears the story with a twang of emotion that others probably wouldn’t experience. Maybe I could give you another example. Another great, great, great, grandfather of mine was a lieutenant in the East India company Army during the 1857 Indian mutiny and the siege of Cawnpore (modern day Kanpur). Of a population of seven hundred British men, only four survived the massacre by swimming six miles down the Ganges River to safe territory- my ancestor was one of the four. What is this to you? An interesting story I expect. What is it to me? A fascinating twist of fate without which I would not exist.

I asked my Granddad if there has ever been anything in all his searches that he would have preferred not to have known. He pauses, perhaps tellingly, and then answered, ‘No, it’s still fascinating’. This is a pretty big thing for my grandfather. About two years ago, having just installed broadband and being able to spend much more time searching through internet sites, he discovered that his own mother had had an illegitimate child in 1918, ten years before he was born. He had never had any idea and is almost certain his father didn’t either. The child, Phyllis, now a 91 year old lady, was adopted when she was two and has apparently spent her whole life wanting to know who her family were but being told she should never try to find out. Tragically, Phyllis is now gripped by dementia and was confused and unsettled when my grandfather went to meet her for the first time.

There is something desperately sad about this story. For Phyllis, the women who always felt lost; for my grandfather, who will never properly know his sister; and for his mother, who lived her life in silence, never being able to tell those she loved about the child she lost. For me, this more than anything captures the essence of what I’m talking about – stories which really are so much more than just stories.

New Roundup: Week 5

This week Antonia and Katie zoom in on hustings, St Hilda’s recent elections and Susan Greenfield’s extreme scientific statements. They also check out the impressive photographic frenzy that was the paper’s centrespread.

OUSU policy review criticised

0

Oxford Universiyt Student Union council is facing criticism for an “irrelevant” discussion of policies that are due to expire this term.

OUSU council annually evaluate every policy that is coming to the end of its fourth year. The policies, which are put forward by the Common Rooms and OUSU executives, are contained in the Student Union’s booklet of what OUSU believe.

The policies range from extending library opening hours to campaigning against the use of sweatshop labour in University products.

Students have been critical of this process. Jim O’Connell, Univ’s OUSU representative, has questioned the importance of the policy booklet itself commenting, “I think there’s a danger of many students seeing this kind of long-winded process as being irrelevant to their needs, especially when issues under discussion include condemnation of the Armenian Genocide, which happened nearly a century ago.”

He added, “It’s these kinds of motions that lead to the perception that OUSU wastes time and isn’t focused on the needs of students and common rooms.”

Lewis Iwu has rebuffed these arguments. He said, “You might think that Policy Lapse is unimportant, but the motions contained in this booklet were each considered and debated in Council by your predecessors; MCR Reps, JCR Reps, OUSU Exec members and delegates. I’d hope that in a few years time, people take the time to review the debates we have in Council today and I hope you take some time considering the policies in this booklet.”

Magdalen JCR president Laurence Mills also stressed the need to consider the application of OUSU policy to lives of regular students.

He said, “Whilst we only go through this process once a year, I think that there are definitely some issues that we will be debating that a lot of students won’t think are relevant, and so it is important that we reassess whether or not we are focusing on the important aspects of student life that we can be making progress on.”

One of the most controversial policies to discuss is OUSU’s pro-choice stance. Matthew Brown, the President of Oxford’s Pro-Life society has found it “strange” to “take such a definitive position” when the student union represents many individuals”.

He added, “Note OUSU also refers to its pro-choice position as a ‘campaign’ which I believe to be unhelpful language. Their position is to ‘campaign’, in the affirmative, rather than to support all students.”

Defending this position, Both O’Connell and Mills argued that OUSU’s pro-choice stance is vital to maintain. O’Connell said, “OUSU needs to be pro-choice because it has a direct and hugely important effect on welfare, because people confronted with that kind of situation need the best possible information and advice.”

Exposed: Oxford sex laid bare

0

One-night-stands, STD’s and clinches in college libraries: the full story of student sex at Oxford University has been laid bare this week.

Historians get the most action, only 15% of students are still to lose their virginity and you are much more likely to achieve a First Class degree if you are homosexual.

The revelations were among an array of dirty details exposed by a Cherwell survey of more than 850 students.

According to the responses, the most promiscuous colleges were Somerville and New, whilst in contrast, it was University College that had the greatest proportion of virgins.

Meanwhile it was those studying History that claimed to have the most sexual activity, with almost a quarter of respondents scoring between three and five times a week.

Closely in behind were Politics, Philosophy and Economics undergraduates and students of English Literature.

Interestingly, the survey also suggested a correlation between the amount of sex had by students and the final results they achieve in exams.

Those that have the most sex tend to attain a 2:1 or 2:2 result, whilst students who have sex less than once a month or abstain altogether are just as likely to achieve a First as fail altogether.

There was also a further relationship between students’ grades and their sexual orientation: 41% of homosexuals who replied to the survey achieved a First in exams, compared to 38% of asexuals and a third of those who feel attracted to the opposite gender.

More generally, the survey also threw up concerning results with regard to sexual health: although a mere 5% of students confessed to having had a sexually transmitted disease (STD) – much lower than the national average of one in three people – around half of respondents admitted to having unprotected sex. Furthermore, approximately 59% of students said they had never been tested for an STD.

Sam Tucker, JCR Welfare Rep at St Anne’s College thought that the reason for a relatively high number of students having unprotected sex could stem from lack of knowledge about the risks.

“I think people sometimes don’t realise the consequences of their actions,” he said. “If we make it easier for condoms to be accessible and to be obtained anonymously, then this number should drop.”

The survey also seemed to debunk many college stereotypes regarding sex: Wadham College – the home of the infamous annual ‘Queer Bop,’ and traditionally seen as a liberal college – had the lowest proportion of homosexuals, with a mere 3.5% of respondents claiming to be gay.
In contrast, Merton and Mansfield topped the table of the colleges with the highest proportion of homosexuals, scoring 21.4% and 16.6% respectively. Meanwhile St Hugh’s and Hertford had the largest percentage of hetrosexuals.

Asked to comment, Mohsin Khan, Chair of University’s LGBTQ Council downplayed the results, saying the distribution of sexuality among colleges varied from year to year.

“From personal experience, I have not found college stereotypes about sexuality to be true in any way,” he said.

“Every year, the distribution of LGBTQ people differs from college to college. There is no liberal gay college here and there is no straight college either.”

Khan also emphasized the need of protection, after the survey demonstrated that homosexuals were more likely to have unprotected sex than heterosexuals by more than 13%.

“LGBTQ Council has been working quite hard to inform lesbians and bisexual women that they do need to practice safe sex,” he said.

“Just because you don’t penetrate doesn’t mean you are safe. Women may want to use dental dams, just as gay men may want to use condoms. Lesbian-lesbian sex poses less risk, but it isn’t zero.”

Such a message seemed just as relevant to graduate as undergraduate students, after results showed older students to be getting far more bedroom action: 27% of graduates claimed to be having intercourse 3-4 times per week, in comparison to only 21% of undergrads.

Also, a staggering 81.4% of graduates admitted to regularly masturbating in comparison to 75.3% of their younger counterparts. Only 10% of student respondents said they have had more than 10 sexual partners.

 

OUSU criticised for "irrelevant" discussion

0

OUSU council is facing criticism for an “irrelevant” discussion of policies that are due to expire this term.

OUSU council annually evaluate every policy that is coming to the end of its fourth year. The policies, which are put forward by the Common Rooms and OUSU executives, are contained in the Student Union’s booklet of what OUSU believe.

The policies range from extending library opening hours to campaigning against the use of sweatshop labour in University products.

Students have been critical of this process. Jim O’Connell, Univ’s OUSU representative, has questioned the importance of the policy booklet itself, commenting, “I think there’s a danger of many students seeing this kind of long-winded process as being irrelevant to their needs, especially when issues under discussion include condemnation of the Armenian Genocide, which happened nearly a century ago.”

He added, “It’s these kinds of motions that lead to the perception that OUSU wastes time and isn’t focused on the needs of students and common rooms.”

Lewis Iwu has rebuffed these arguments. He said, “You might think that Policy Lapse is unimportant, but the motions contained in this booklet were each considered and debated in Council by your predecessors; MCR Reps, JCR Reps, OUSU Exec members and delegates. I’d hope that in a few years time, people take the time to review the debates we have in Council today and I hope you take some time considering the policies in this booklet.”

Magdalen JCR president Laurence Mills also stressed the need to consider the application of OUSU policy to lives of regular students.

He said, “Whilst we only go through this process once a year, I think that there are definitely some issues that we will be debating that a lot of students won’t think are relevant, and so it is important that we reassess whether or not we are focusing on the important aspects of student life that we can be making progress on.”

One of the most controversial policies to discuss is OUSU’s pro-choice stance. Matthew Brown, the President of Oxford’s Pro-Life society has found it “strange” to “take such a definitive position” when the student union represents many individuals”.

He added, “Note OUSU also refers to its pro-choice position as a ‘campaign’ which I believe to be unhelpful language. Their position is to ‘campaign’, in the affirmative, rather than to support all students.”

Defending this position, Both O’Connell and Mills argued that OUSU’s pro-choice stance is vital to maintain. O’Connell said, “OUSU needs to be pro-choice because it has a direct and hugely important effect on welfare, because people confronted with that kind of situation need the best possible information and advice.”

Vice-chancellor’s society for donors

0

Oxford University has set up a new society to recognise those who donate money to the institution.

Part of the Oxford Thinking campaign, the donor recognition society known as the Vice Chancellor’s Circle was launched last week with a private reception, debate and dinner hosted by John Hood.

The title of the debate was, “Poetry is beautiful, but science is what matters”, and was chaired by the barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC.

John Hood said at the launch, “We are delighted to recognise our donors’ generous support in this way. Their support helps to strengthen our colleges, divisions, libraries, laboratories, and every centre, society, club and institution that sustains the intellectual life of the University and carries Oxford’s vital mission into the future.”

The society has one hundred founding members and includes college donors, alumni and non-alumni, individuals, trusts and foundations, and corporate organisations. However, the University has not released the names of the members.

The Oxford Thinking Campaign yesterday celebrated its first birthday. In its first year, the campaign has raised £713 million, 57% of its £1.25 billion target. However, the project has been facing difficulties due to the economic slow down.

Nevertheless, the university and colleges have received some notable gifts in the last year, including a single donation of £1.75 million to Wadham college, £3.25 million to the University’s summer schools and a single donation of $50 million to Christ Church.

The Chancellor’s Circle is not the first donor recognition society to be set up at Oxford. In 1990, the late Lord Jenkins set up the Chancellor’s Court of Benefactors, which now has 155 members.

The University’s Encaenia ceremony celebrates generous donors. Last year, eight men and women were honoured.

 

LMH students left without rooms

0

A delay in building at Lady Margaret Hall means over 40 undergraduates promised a place in a new college accommodation block will be forced to live out next term.

The college administration this week announced that it would help students find and pay for houses in North Oxford. JCR President Sourav Choudhury said the policy would result in “a substantial loss” for LMH.

The college had originally said that every second-year student would be provided a place in halls, and told the JCR to cancel their annual room ballot.

“Naturally students have shown concern, but they’ve been kept in the loop”, Choudhury said. “The Bursar is consulting individually with students to find houses that meet their needs.”

Jake Leeper, Vice President of the JCR, praised LMH staff, saying “considering that college did not have to offer the scheme I think that they’ve been excellent in working with students. Our domestic bursar has even begun to view houses with students so that he has a good idea of the type of houses students would prefer to live in.”

“I have been in regular contact with the administration staff since and think that by both sides realising the difficulties and unfortunate nature of the situation we’ve been able to come up with very good solutions.”

Both Leeper and Choudhury expressed approval of the college’s reaction to the delay. “We found out on Tuesday of 0th week that the building works scheduled to be ready by July were not going to be ready by the start of Michaelmas term. The next day, on Wednesday of 0th, we had an emergency accommodation meeting with college staff to discuss what we should do,” said Leeper.

Under the new agreement, LMH will subsidise students forced to live out next term a £300 subsidy. Those who live out for an entire year will receive £500.

Choudhury said 20 of the students due to live in the new accommodation block would still be able to remain in college after administrators agreed to suspend a refurbishment of LMH’s Victorian graduate housing.

He said that he felt blame should be evenly divided between those involved. “At this point it would be imprudent just to blame contractors. This is something that needs to be looked into in depth later.”

However, he added that he hoped the college might be able to obtain a refund from some of those involved in building. “Hopefully we can get some money back from contractors”.

The delay follows complaints over the level of noise coming from the building site at LMH, which bursar Bart Ashton last week apologised for.

He refused to comment on the latest developments.

 

Balliol JCR gives living wage to staff

0

Balliol JCR has become the first common room to sign up to pay a Living Wage to its staff.

The Junior Common Room has agreed to increase its core levy charge on members by £1.33 to pay a living wage to five of its staff. The motion presented in the last JCR meeting argued, “If members of the JCR support the payment of a Living Wage to JCR staff in principle, they should be prepared to support it in practice with a direct increase to the JCR core levy”.

Hannah O’Rourke, a Balliol student, campaigned in favour of the motion. “Living wage is a very important issue especially in times of recession. A job should keep you out of poverty, not keep you in it”, she said.

She added that the move was “a useful way to apply pressure on colleges and the university. If we, as student employers, can pay a living wage, then surely they can to.”

JCR President Iain Large praised the principle that has been turned into practice. “The JCR has shown its support for the Living Wage Campaign for many years in principle. It is good to see that it supports it in practice too, by agreeing to fund a living wage for the staff it employs.”

Felix Flicker, the campaigner and a student at St Catherine’s college commented on the motion. “This is a vital step towards achieving a Living Wage in both Balliol College and the University as a whole. It is a further demonstration that student support for the campaign is very strong. Students aren’t content to be provising poverty pay salaries: nor should Balliol College be.”

The Living Wage Campaign argues that the £5.15 minimum wage is not enough for Oxford residents to live on. It suggests that all workers in the city should be payed at least £7 per hour to reflect the city’s housing, transport, and groceries costs.

Next week The Living Wage campaign is to hold a ceremony honouring institutions that pay the sufficient amounts to their staff. President of Oxford UnionCorey Dixon, OUSU President-Elect Stefan Baskerville and the Oxford Mayor will all receive a certificate of recognition.

Corey Dixon said the Union “was already a living wage employer and the event was conducted to publicly show our support”.

Oxford Council last week guaranteed all employees a minimum living wage, while OUSU has supported the campaign since its inception in 2006.

 

SSL experiences power cut

0

Social Sciences Library and two colleges nearby were hit by a power cut on Tuesday evening.

At about 5pm, the lights and the electronic equipment in the library suddenly turned off. After 15 minutes, the staff decided to close the library. This caused inconvenience for many revising finalists.

Mansfield and St Catherine’s colleges also were hit by the power cut. At St Catz, electricity was restored only the next day.