Saturday 22nd November 2025
Blog Page 2141

Musical Expeditions: Bluegrass in Upstate New York

0

“Old Forge is a sad end of the road for most of its visitors”

Two hours of driving separate Old Forge, where I was, from North Creek, where I wanted to be. Both places are in the Adirondack Park – a vast area of lakes and wooded mountains in Upstate New York – but apart from that they have nothing in common. Old Forge, though once a spring pad for adventures, is now the crazy golf capital of the universe and sad end of the road for most of its visitors. North Creek, on the other hand, is a remote little hamlet right in the depths of the Adirondack Mountains, which plays host every year to the Upper Hudson Bluegrass Festival. As I had no other way of getting there, I had to try and hitch a lift.

I set up in Old Forge some time in the morning, on the road heading northwards out of town. In my hand I was clasping a bit of cardboard that read BLUE GRASS on one side, and UPPER HUDSON on the other – both sides absolutely useless, I later realised, because Upper Hudson is not a place but a vast area, and no-one down in Old Forge was ever likely to have heard of the bluegrass festival.

Luckily, before long, chance had it that I found myself preparing a new sign, which would be inscribed NORTH CREEK – a name I knew I’d heard in connection with the festival, but I wasn’t sure if it was the actual location, or the nearest place, or a town on the way.

Fifteen minutes or less after I first set up, a little white police car came snaking along. I wasn’t sure if I was breaking the law or not by hitchhiking, and I could have just stood there to find out – to see if it stopped by me or carried on along its way. But it suddenly seemed like the best idea would be to stick the old sign under my arm and casually set out across the road, as if I wasn’t hitchhiking at all. While I was doing so, stepping out onto the zebra crossing which happened to be right in front of me, I noticed that behind the first police car there was another one, a big State Trooper vehicle, creeping along, ominous as can be. Just as I was making it across, they pulled over to my side of the road, and stopped in a lay-by a little further along the road from me. It was pretty clear by now that they had come along with regards to myself, but it seemed too late to go and discuss the situation with them.

Next thing, another of these State Trooper beasts pitched up. I was walking along the pavement by this time, with the other police cars behind me, and just happened to be coming up to a spot where the road cut in for a lay-by or a parking lot or something. This meant that the police car could pull in and give the guys inside a good close look at me. I had made it to this spot just before them, and it was my right of way anyway, so I crossed just as they were turning in, giving myself a nice opportunity to show them how casual I was feeling about the whole thing. I gave a nod of thanks – as if they’d invited me to cross – turned away, and carried on ambling down the street.

The obscurity of my sign, along with my carefree air, seemed to have done the trick, as none of them turned to follow me. I’d have thought that even the slightest glimpse of my sign – which wasn’t by the way well-hidden in the least – would have confirmed I was a hitchhiker and earned me at least a chat with the cops. At any rate, it occurred to me I might go and buy a bottle of water at a nearby ice-cream shop, while the situation calmed down.

Even though it was only just past breakfast-time, the queue for ice-creams was enormous, which was ideal for me, as it gave the cops a good while in which to clear off.

Some time later, water in hand, I headed back to the spot where I’d been before. The cops were nowhere to be seen by now, but I felt somewhat apprehensive anyway, and wasn’t quite ready to start thumbing down a lift again. So I thought I’d slump down on the ground and scribble myself a new sign, just to kill some more time. I happened to decide I’d label this one NORTH CREEK, for a bit of variety.

When it was done, I though it looked pretty good – a good clear sign. So I decided I’d use it, the North Creek one, in combination with the bluegrass one. This time I thought I’d lean them up, rather than hold them, and plant myself down by their side. I also thought I’d pick up the book I was reading, in the first place to stave off boredom; secondly because it was Nineteen Eighty-Four and seemed an apt thing to be reading while being hawked by police; and lastly because I thought it might make me look like an appealing guy to pick up.

 

“I sat there for nearly an hour, the police car never budged”

 

I’d only been there about five minutes when there showed up a police truck again, this one different from the earlier ones. It was semi-disguised, the only thing that gave it away for a police truck being the blue light on its roof. Otherwise it was just a big grey four-by-four with a trailer. It pulled in and parked itself right opposite me, in that same old lay-by/parking lot thing. I decided I’d stay put this time, because I couldn’t be bothered with the whole ice-cream shop business again, and if I kept doing stuff like that, I’d probably end up missing most the festival. I didn’t much look like a hitchhiker by now anyway, what with my book out and being seated and everything.

I sat there for pretty nearly an hour, with the police car never budging an inch. Round about then I decided it probably wasn’t a good spot, so I wandered on in the out-of-town direction, and soon set myself up on a corner where no car could miss me. I was directly visible for a good two hundred yards and there was a place a little way beyond me ideal for cars stop at.

A good half of an hour went by and I was beginning to lose hope, but just then an old lumberjack called Morse came by. He asked me where I wanted to go – North Creek way, I said – and told me to jump in.

At first he seemed somewhat cold, not chatty in the least, as though he regretted stopping for me. After a while, though, he struck up a sort of conversation: ‘You sure lucked out… me comin’ along,’ he said.

‘Yes, sir,’ I told him. ‘I believe I did.’

There was a bit of a pause, and then he said: ‘Almost didn’t come by this way.’ He wanted me to thank him again, I think.

‘Well I’m glad you did – thanks so much,’ I said. ‘I was thinking of giving up and going home.’

After another short while he spoke again: ‘Folks don’t generally like giving lifts these days.’

‘Yeah, why is that?’

‘In case they get mugged, which happens.’ The way he said it, and looked at me when he said ‘happens’, it was like a threat, as if really what he was saying was: ‘I know your game – don’t even think about it.’

Well, after that, bit by bit he lightened up, and it turned out he was pretty good company this sixty-something or so lumberjack.

And so we drove on, and two hours later stopped by a sign at the roadside pointing up a lane to the Upper Hudson Bluegrass Festival. I paid my respects to old Morse, shuffled out the car, and set my course for the music.

 

“You could tell it was a family up there, the way they grinned at each other”

 

When I finally arrived at the festival, it was the Atkinson Family up on stage. They’re a five-piece band, but there was only one microphone to pick up not just the singing but all the instruments as well. So they all had to huddle round it, and each time one of them did a solo, he had to muscle in to the front so that he’d be nearest the microphone.

You could tell it was a family up there, the way they grinned at each other now and then while they played, and then the way they chatted to the audience between songs, finishing each other’s sentences, and correcting each other, and dropping in the occasional family joke and stuff like that. You could also tell that the audience thought this was great. Some of them even joined in the Atkinsons’ conversations.

I understood all this better later on, when Mrs Atkinson explained to me that bluegrass festivals were like huge family reunions – everyone’s family in the bluegrass world – everyone knows everyone else, more or less. Plus, everyone’s welcome, it seemed. As I was new to it all, I had countless people approach me, call me ‘kiddo’ or ‘son’, and strike up some kind of innocent conversation, just to make me feel welcome there.

As for the music, not just the Atkinson Family but all of it, the sound was very traditional, and not because they were all playing covers. There were some covers – ‘bluegrassed’ versions of Johnny Cash songs, Hank Williams songs, Woody Guthrie songs, Jimmie Rodgers songs, and stuff like that – but mostly they played originals, and even these sounded like they could have been written fifty years ago. That’s the particular thing about bluegrass, it doesn’t change much. It prides itself on sticking to its roots, as Mrs Atkinson explained to me later on.

 

“They call it bluegrass etiquette”

 

It’s an American music, she told me, which came about initially by the merger of three different types of music: Irish fiddle music, black gospel, and mountain-people folk. The father of the genre was a man called Bill Munro, the founding member of the Blue Grass Boys, which he formed in 1938, naming them after his home state of Kentucky, also known as the ‘Bluegrass State’ and still the bluegrass capital. Bluegrass is easily mistakable with regular country music, of which it’s a sub-genre, but the two styles are distinct, if you know what to look for, and a lot of bluegrass fans look down on regular country as less authentic. Bluegrass is more up-tempo, and generally has more virtuoso musicianship; it’s meant to be played only on acoustic instruments. Plus, the songs are about different things from country. In country you mostly just get ballads, while in bluegrass there’s a mixture of three main types: Train songs, killing songs, and gospel songs. Gospel is a big part of it.

Another big part of it, which goes along with the gospel-side of the music, is a general American wholesomeness. Everyone’s always jolly, cracking jokes, offering you a seat if you need one, and smiling at you whenever possible – ‘bluegrass etiquette’ they call it.

I wasn’t sure if this wholesomeness sprung from the fact that most the people at the festival were getting on a bit – grandparent-age at least – but a hip-looking guy in a baseball cap called Daryl assured me that at other bluegrass festivals you see more young people, and the etiquette and the whole thing remains just the same.

This same Daryl also told me that people stay up all night at bluegrass festivals, playing bluegrass non-stop, even the elderly ones – because bluegrass is like a drug when you’re playing, he said. And the people who come to watch at bluegrass festivals are mostly accomplished musicians themselves, so everyone keeps on playing together all night long. One reason you get so many old people at bluegrass festivals, Daryl said, was that people who like bluegrass just go on living. As they’ve got bluegrass for a drug, they don’t need to put any harmful stuff into their bodies, so they just keep going.

 

“Listening to the music on CD at home is one thing”

I didn’t stick around to see what Daryl was talking about, because he’d also said that if it rained people wouldn’t stay up anyway, because the instruments can’t stay in tune in the rain. It was raining quite a bit and the sky looked grim; the light was fading, and I didn’t particularly feel like spending the night with a whole bunch of mosquitoes under a sky that wouldn’t even have any stars because of the rain; I also felt like I’d almost seen enough of this festival, and wasn’t particularly minded to stay for day two; so I headed back to the road, leaving just as I had arrived, with the Atkinson Family up on stage again (all bands return to the stage for a second set).

Catching a lift home was a piece of cake compared with my outward journey. I was picked up almost immediately by a young couple coming up to the Adirondacks for the weekend from Albany, the capital of New York State. One of them was an architect, the other an engineer, and getting in the car with them was really like returning to normal life. The folks there couldn’t have been nicer, but it was really quite a culture shock, the bluegrass festival. Listening to the music on CD at home is one thing; bumbling around among the actual people is something else.

 

Review: Inglorious Basterds

0

I have seen no less than eight people walk out of this film. They ranged from an elderly couple, tottering out as the first scalp is sliced off, to a group of young people who slinked out muttering something about “fucking French”. This is certainly not your average summer blockbuster. It’s talky, wincingly violent, and a little complicated, all of which are qualities which could drive restless audience members to vacate their paid-for seat. They’re also the qualities which make Inglourious Basterds two and three quarter hours of unmitigated cinematic joy. Quentin Tarantino has produced a hilarious, magnificently accomplished masterpiece, tossing around and tearing apart conventions like a playful monkey to craft the funniest, most frightening and thought-provoking film of the year.

The basic idea is a war film with Spaghetti Western elements. Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) is tasked with leading a group of Jewish-American soldiers, the eponymous Basterds, into Nazi-occupied France to, as he so wonderfully puts it, inflict “murder, torture, intimation, and terror” on the men who did the same to the European countries they occupy. Meanwhile, the utterly terrifying Col. Hans Landa (Christopher Waltz) hunts Jews with charming, monstrous precision, whilst Shoshanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent), a girl he let escape for his own amusement, plots to inc

inerate the Nazi high command. Every single performance from this stunning international ensemble cast is a pleasure to watch. All their accents and mannerisms are played up for some truly hysterical moments of comedy – the British characters are especially amusing, along with Pitt’s tight-lipped “Bonjourno” – without ever becoming overly ridiculous.

As well as the ever-flowing comedic moments, Basterds offers some heart-stoppingly tense moments of suspense constructed around the unpredictability of the smooth-talking, subtly aggressive and intense Nazi officers. The film is similarly visually stunning. Brief spurts of action are a treat for the eyes, and all are managed without a hint of CGI, which led to two of the stars nearly becoming cremated during a particularly ambitious scene. The wry, winking iconography Tarantino scatters throughout also deserves special mention. Look out for the looming black poodle sternly criticizing Goebbels’ (Sylvester Groth) guffawing racism, Landa’s emasculating Swiss style horn-pipe, and Major Dieter Hellstrom’s (August Diehl) fantastic cowboy boot shaped pint glass, coming to wreck havoc on the Apache Basterds.

For a film so colourfully ostentatious, Basterds is a film imbued with great amounts of depth and subtlety.  Essentially, this is a film about the audience. We see Hitler laugh hysterically at the Americans being slaughtered in the film-within-a-film Nation’s Pride, and our natural instinct is repulsion – but it quickly dawns upon us that laughing at nasty, painful death is exactly how we’ve spent the last two hours. Having the twentieth century’s ultimate figure of evil indulging in the same edgy delights as our good selves might send a ripple of unease over an audience which laughed heartily at the Bear Jew (a surprisingly accomplished Eli Roth) clobber a Nazi soldier to death whilst yelling baseball conventions. Just like Roth’s own Hostel, we find ourselves forced to question why we find the violence so entertaining.

The phrase ‘kosher porn’ has been tossed around by some reviewers to describe the visceral, vengeful joy the film provides. These certainly aren’t the Jewish characters you tend to see in more conventional war films. Their gleeful, effervescently comic brutality makes the Nazis the victims, inverting preconceptions of the place of Jewish figures in war films by making them figures of absolute power rather than desperate resisters. It’s actually their Nazi victims that seem to elicit glimmers of sympathy rather than our heroes. We’re given very little background on the Basterds themselves, whilst their scalped, carved and shot targets talk of defending their people, hugging their mothers and seeing their children grow up.

I could write about this film for so much longer. There is so much to praise, so much to talk about. It is Tarantino’s unrivalled magnum opus, a film which defies all expectations and the potential to change war films forever. Please, ignore the ignorant negative and lukewarm reviews floating around. If you enjoy cinema, go and see this film.

 

Education: The failure to measure success

0

This week the British education system delivered yet another record haul. It’s the 27th year in a row that A level results have improved. At the current rate of progress, 100% of school leavers will have an A before the century is out. Celebration meets with cynicism. But apart from scoffing at this specious success, the stats confirm two facts. Firstly, A levels are failing to offer a reliable indication for admissions tutors. And secondly, with 50% of private schools’ grades being A compared with 20% of comprehensives’, education suffers from great disparity.

What is to be done? Firstly, Britain needs to be able to refute accusations of ‘dumming down’ at all levels. It is implausible that every year leaves the one before eating its dust. Even Usain Bolt clocks up some slightly slower times between world records. If twice as many graduates leave with firsts as a decade ago, somehow this must mean firsts are getting easier. Even if genuine improvements are being made, they are being effaced by an obsession to make the numbers look good whatever the cost. Tables beyond our control such as the UN’s education index put Britain in 28th place globally and show falling standards. If you need more convincing that higher scores are being achieved by shifting the goal posts then take a look at the exam regs for your degree from the 50s. Thought it couldn’t be any harder than it is now? Think again.

But even if being more realistic about how well people are doing stems the dubious tide of success, the top grade at A level is still going to be too overcrowded for the most competitive universities to see what’s going on. There is a big shift in ability between someone scraping an A and someone scoring full marks. Next year’s A* (for those scoring 90%) won’t help as it is only awarded for A2 not for AS – i.e. after offers have been made. Besides, it won’t be long till we’ll need to add another star.

There wasn’t always this problem – from 1963-84, A grades were reserved for the top 10% of performers. Grades showed not how much of the syllabus you had mastered, but how well you competed. We shouldn’t return to this since it is useful to know what proportion of the syllabus’ criteria have been met. But we can easily restore the competitive factor by another means. Let’s introduce a percentile score alongside the grade to show where candidates rank in the field. Standards will rise as candidates won’t be able relax, confident they’re on track for the middle of a big cushy grade span but have to push themselves to gain every point on the 100 rung ladder. That way everyone can get an A*** or first for politicians to brag about without making the whole exercise useless for admissions and employers.

But although we’ve worked out how to tell how well people have done in exams, we haven’t ended an admissions tutor’s troubles. Now we bring out our second set of alarming statistics showing that, as a group, people who have their education paid for are at an immense advantage. Not only do they do much better at GCSE and A level, but also, although comprising just 7% of the school population, they make up around half of Oxford’s domestic intake. Later in life the advantages keep rolling in – 75% of judges went to private school.

Now, I am the last to stand up in favour of positive discrimination. It would be divisive and detrimental to the deserving. But top universities should be looking to admit the brightest and the best and that’s not necessarily the same as those scoring the top A levels. If someone’s done well because they’ve had easy access to much better resources, smaller classes and been able to afford additional exam-focused, spoon-feeding tuition then this isn’t as impressive as someone who’s achieved the same without any of that.

What the Russell Group should be looking for are those with the greatest potential. This shouldn’t be measured by the current aptitude tests – it’s too easy to improve through coaching, once more the domain of the privileged. Instead, admissions tutors should have much more access to the context of a candidate’s achievement. The more relevant – and it must be relevant – background information they have, the more accurate this process will be. How well someone has done in relation to others who share their situation is a good indication of how well they are likely to do once the field is levelled.

Once we know what place people have finished in as well as who their real rivals were, then we can find out who the real successes are.

Merton tops Norrington Table

0

Merton College has the best Norrington score at Oxford for the third year running.

Merton’s warden, Dame Jessica Rawson, put it down to “a culture of academic excitement and commitment” adding, “while in any one year the Norrington table is not of huge importance, consistent performance over a period of time is significant.”

The Norrington table, the University’s official list of undergraduate colleges ranked by academic performance, scores colleges according to the classifications of undergraduate degrees awarded that year.

Harris Manchester College, which had managed to climb five places in the preceding year, dropped once again to last place amongst the Oxford undergraduate colleges. The college has been last since the scoring system was made official by the University in 2005.

Magdalen achieved the highest proportion of firsts in its 550-year history, with 43 out of 101 students in the top category. They came third on the list, beaten by a mere 0.26% by St. John’s.

The Norrington table is regularly criticised for being a poor ranking system. The small numbers of students per college can result in surprising inconsistency from year to year. Furthermore, unlike Cambridge’s Tompkin’s Table, it is not adjusted to take account of subjects which offer a higher proportion of first class degrees, such as Mathematics.

Many students don’t take the table seriously. One fourth year at Pembroke said, “Of course people look at the Norrington table but I think most people take it with a pinch of salt; academic achievements aren’t the only measure of success.”

However, since the University made the table official, interest in the annual lists has been intensifying amongst the colleges and in the media.

As Magdalen President, Professor David Clary, admitted, “The Norrington table, for all its faults, is looked at carefully by many dons in Oxford who like to see their college doing well in the table.”

Wadham’s Warden, Sir Neil Chalmers emphasised that the scoring was not a priority for the college, who ranked 9th on the list. While he considers the Norrington table “useful background information… the reputation we have from students who are here now is more important.”

Indeed, there is little evidence the scores have any effect on applicants choosing colleges.

One student applying to Oxford said, “I did notice the Norrington table but I was more interested in the culture of the college and the kinds of people who were there.”

Norrington Table Rankings for Academic Year 2008/9:

1. Merton
2. St John’s
3. Magdalen
4. Corpus Christi
5. New
6. Hertford
7. University
8. Lincoln
9. Wadham
10. Queen’s
11. Trinity
12. Keble
13. Christ Church
14. Balliol
15. Worcester
16. Jesus
17. St Catherine’s
18. Exeter
19. Somerville
20. St Anne’s
21. Oriel
22. Lady Margaret Hall
23. St Hugh’s
24. Pembroke
25. St Peter’s
26. Brasenose
27. St Edmund Hall
28. Mansfield
29. St Hilda’s
30. Harris Manchester

 

Tariq Ramadan sacked for hosting Iranian TV show

0

Oxford’s recently appointed Chair of Islamic Studies, Professor Tariq Ramadan, has been dismissed from his positions at Erasmus University Rotterdam and as an advisor on ethnic integration to the city of Rotterdam.

The dismissals follow Ramadan’s decision to host a show on the Iranian channel Press TV. In a joint statement issued by the University and the city of Rotterdam, concern was expressed at the indirect association of Ramadan with Iran’s “repressive regime.” Ramadan’s involvement was judged to be “irreconcilable” with the two positions in the Netherlands.

Oxford University commented on the situation, “Freedom of speech is a fundamental right respected by the University.”

“Professor Ramadan’s views are entirely his own and do not represent the views of the University. However, the University does not in any way curtail the freedom of its academic staff to appear and express their opinions in the media.”

In response to his dismissal, Professor Ramadan has argued that in appearing on the channel he has chosen “the path of critical debate.”

Ramadan takes up his position at Oxford this September.

 

Proctors punish OUCA after racism scandal

0

The proctors have announced that the Oxford University Conservative Association (OUCA) will no longer hold the right to use the University’s name in its title and will not be allowed a stall at this year’s Fresher’s Fair.

The decision to remove these privileges comes as a response to allegations that members of the organisation encouraged and partook in the telling of racist jokes at hustings last term.

OUCA was the focus of national media attention after the events were reported in Cherwell. The members involved in the controversy have since resigned from the Association.

Anthony Bouthall, President at the time, defended the organisation after the scandal. “I cannot reiterate strongly enough that OUCA has no place for racism, and abhors and rejects all racial prejudice,” he said.

Ben Lyons, co-chair of the Oxford University Labour Club, welcomed the decision. “We could have the Oxford University Thatcher Appreciation Society or the Oxford University Let’s-Pretend-We’re-Victorian Club but there’s no place for the Oxford University Bigots.”

In a statement released by the press office the University emphasised its commitment to equality and good race relations, pointing out that the events in question “do not reflect the way the overwhelming majority of our students think or behave,” adding, “The University strongly condemns any form of racism and discrimination.”

 

Police patrols increase after a series of Oxford thefts

0

Oxford police have been heavily engaged in efforts to ensure the safety of those studying at language schools in the city.

‘Operation Buzzard’ involves officers making high-visibility patrols on the Blackbird Leys estate. Foreign students and young tourists have been targeted by thieves in recent months, with ten robberies recorded since the beginning of July.

One language school has now stopped sending female students to the estate. Shaena Whitney, accommodation and welfare officer for the Oxford Language Centre commented, “We don’t use Blackbird Leys very much now and I would certainly not put the young girls out there because they just don’t feel comfortable when they get off the bus.”

Ana Vucetic, also a law student, expressed similar concerns, “There are noticeably fewer police than I’m used to seeing [in America], particularly in places and at times where their attendance would be comforting, such as outside clubs on Friday nights.”

In response, two ‘safe havens’ for students have been established, one at The Ozone Bowlplex and another at Blackbird Leys Leisure Centre. Students can seek help there if they are feeling unsafe.

Ben Oakley-Rowland, Assistant Manager of the Leisure Centre confirmed that they have agreed to “allow [foreign students] to use telephones et cetera to make contact with relevant parties.” 

He added, “To my knowledge we have had not had to offer our services as a safe haven.”

Neighbourhood Sgt Rob Axe commented, “The neighbourhood team will continue to carry out high visibility patrols throughout August, along with officers who have been dedicated to the operation, Thames Valley Police Mounted Section and Oxford City Council Street Wardens.”

Martin Ström, a Swedish second-year lawyer at St Anne’s College, suggested improvements to policing could be a solution, remarking, “the police could be more visible to make their presence more apparent.”

Det. Sgt. Steve Raffield, of Oxford’s Robbery Team said, “I would like to send a warning to those people who choose to commit robberies in Blackbird Leys – we will identify who you are and you will be arrested.

“I would urge anyone walking in Blackbird Leys in the evening to take extra care and be vigilant of what is happening around them.”

 

Better late than never: The Season’s Predictions

0

These will be short, sweet, and largely unexplained given how pointless and wildly innacurate such predictions turn out to be.

Champions – Chelsea

Top Four (in order) – Chelsea, Man United, Arsenal, Liverpool

Relegated – Hull (good riddance), Portsmouth and probably Burnley

Top Goalscorer – The Drog. Actually, why isn’t he in my fantasy football team?

PFA player of the year – Heart says Arshavin so I’m sticking with it

Newly promoted surprise package – Wolves should have the goals in them

First sacked – Phil Brown

Best signing – Thomas Vermaelen/Glen Johnson

Worst signing – Michael Owen was free so he hardly counts. Antonio Valencia/ Alberto Aquliani: Both have to fill boots far too big for their feet

Will the great Real Madrid experiment succeed: Unfortunately, yes.

 

So there we are. Feel free to comment, mock, or add your own

 

City’s rise opens up breathing space for Spurs

0

As an Arsenal fan this hurts me to say, but I really enjoyed watching Tottenham’s demolition of Hull on Wednesday night. Alan Hansen can grumble and point as much as he likes about Hull’s defending, but it utterly fails to hide the fact that Hull looked so bad because Tottenham were fantastic. Each of their five goals sparkled with verve, quality, and equally as importantly, confidence.

Jermaine Defoe has always been a fantastic finisher, but little he has ever produced before can match the sparkle of his three strikes against Hull. All emphatic finishes from a man who simply expects to score. Much of Tottenham’s display on the night reflected that positive attitude, and at least a portion of this must be attributed to the rise of Manchester City.

In a summer of monumental spending the focus in England at least has been almost entirely on whether or not City’s shiny new signings can propel them into the top four. Meanwhile, Harry Redknapp has been continuing to fine tune the side he began to shape so well last season, adding Peter Crouch and Sebastian Bassong to a side already so improved by the additions of Wilson Palacios and Carlo Cudicini. These signings have hardly gone unheralded, but compared to the fervour surrounding City’s new arrivals it’s fair to say they have been rather understated. Just a few seasons ago these would have been proclaimed as the signings that would break Tottenham into the top four.

So where Juande Ramos started last season with an indubitably talented, but dangerously unbalanced side, Redknapp is able to field a line-up which combines the power of players like Palacios and Huddlestone, the speed of Lennon, the craft of Modric and Keane and the finishing of Defoe. Strength in depth is hardly a problem either. Their bench on Wednesday featured Cudicini, Bentley, Pavlyuchenko, Crouch, Naughton, Chimbonda and O’Hara.

Yet due to the focus on the power of City, even their excellent start to the season will be met with little more than an interested raised eyebrow by most onlookers, and this can only be beneficial to Spurs. Positive results will breed a confidence uninhibited by the sort of pressure they would have faced a few years ago.

Tottenham will not be the only beneficiaries of the diminished expectations. West Ham and Fulham both started the season excellently, but any progress from them this season will doubtlessly be regarded as a surprising bonus.

So Manchester City (and if you must, Arsenal) had better not just be wary of what’s in front of them, but what is creeping up from behind.

 

Britain and Obama’s Healthcare Package

0

Sipping your Starbucks, wearing your denim and listening to the late, great Michael Jackson – American imports seem to sit almost indistinguishably amidst British society. And with no language barrier, and the cosiest of political alliances, the similarities of the British and American cousins are clear for all to see. Even military mishaps are labelled ‘friendly’ fire.

Sitting down to watch England’s very own Hugh Laurie as the maverick diagnostician Dr. House in a humdrum American hospital is hardly radically different from the British equivalents of Casualty and Holby City. Maybe it’s a bit slicker, maybe the actors are all more beautiful and have nicer teeth, but essentially, nothing is lost in translation, except for the nonsensically rare diseases which puzzle Stephen Fry’s sidekick. And even the high emotion of US television can just about be reconciled with British reserve.

However, these outward similarities deceptively mask massive cultural differences behind the ‘Special Relationship’. The debate that has erupted in America over President Obama’s proposed healthcare reforms – essentially helping America’s 47 million uninsured citizens have access to potentially life-saving medical treatment which they would otherwise not qualify for – illustrates these differences explicitly.

The scale of the American debate is huge, and is itself a foreign concept to twenty-first century British politics. Nationally, town hall meetings are taking place where ordinary people on either side of the debate meet to argue their case with the high passions that we’re familiar with from Hollywood. Everyday Sarah Palins across America are espousing their values, while ordinary Bill Clintons rebut with theirs.

To British ears, these arguments are strangely alien. Our NHS sits as a cornerstone of the British establishment – questioning its existence would seem as futile as debating gravity. Only very few individuals on the right-wing of our politics dare to do such a thing—Daniel Hannan, a Conservative MEP is at the forefront of the British arguments against the NHS.

On America’s FOX News, he labelled the NHS a “60 year mistake”, an opinion which has led politicians of every allegiance back in Britain to hastily distance themselves from his view and pledge their support for Nye Bevan’s brainchild. But it would be wrong to dismiss all scepticism out of hand. Neither American sceptics nor Hannan are uncaring people, wishing to cheat the poorest out of healthcare for some outdated class-based discrimination. They argue that the ‘socialized’ system leads to systemic waste, to abuse from every part within, and results in a generally lower quality of care for all. The recurring ‘postcode lottery’ issues of the NHS are evidence of the reality of their concerns – bodies such as NICE have a tough job to do in deciding which medicines are financially viable given the benefits that they provide, and different people with different conditions in different areas may be left worse off. In America – you just pay for what you need.

On the whole, however, these arguments fail to convince British minds. Though the waste that pervades in the NHS presents a stick to beat governments of every stripe with – and attempts to deal with it have involved part-privatisation of some of the NHS’s activities – the benefits of the system outweigh the costs. That healthcare is absolutely free at the point of use in this country, no matter who you are, ought to be a source of pride for each and every British person. The system has flaws, but on the whole, people do seem to recognise the greatness of the institution – its unquestionable presence is quiet testament to this.

This then, is not the blind spot that we have. We recognise the value of the NHS; it is the huge difference in approach that exists between Britain and the USA that we can often fail to acknowledge. It is easy, with this particular debate more than others, to paint Obama as the ‘good guy’ in the British press, but we must remind ourselves that American debates begin with entirely different premises. Though we wear the same clothes and sip the same drinks and watch the same television, our individuality lurks beneath this outward appearance. Americans (to date, at least) have viewed healthcare as a privilege, as fitting within their over-arching commitment to the free market and the value of the private sector; Britain has instead seen healthcare as a fundamental right for its citizens, similar to the services provided by the Police or the Fire Service.

It may seem odd to us that in the wealthiest nation on earth, 47 million individuals are without the provisions that western medicine can provide; but it is our perception of this oddity that it is crucial to recognise and celebrate. We are still Bevan’s children, and his legacy looks after us well. It may not be House, but, as long as every single man, woman and child in Britain can claim medical care free at the point of use, we’ll be happy enough to check into Holby City.