Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2150

Racist slogans worn by Peter’s freshers

Undergraduates at St Peter’s College are to be collectively warned about their behaviour after a group wore t-shirts bearing homophobic and racist comments while on a pub crawl.

When challenged by offended onlookers, they claimed to be from Teddy Hall.

The pub crawl, which took place on Thursday of Freshers’ Week, involved the first years being given t-shirts on which they could write, and then being split into three groups.

As the evening progressed, the writing on some of the t-shirts of one group became increasingly offensive, with accompanying second years advising them to turn their t-shirts inside out, or scribble over the writing.

When challenged, some of the students claimed to be from Teddy Hall, a college with whom St Peter’s College has a longstanding rivalry.

Charlie Southern, the St Edmund Hall JCR President, has called their behaviour, “totally unacceptable.”

He continued, “the fact that when challenged the students claimed to be from Teddy Hall is pretty pathetic to be honest, and it will only come back to harm them to an even greater extent in the end.”

St Peter’s JCR President, Sanjay Nanwani, called the incident “regrettable”, and said that it was “unfortunate that it happened”, conceding that some of the material was offensive.

He stressed that in organising the event, the Freshers’ Committee had abided by all decanal rules and regulations, that the incident was down to a minority of freshers, and put their claims to be from Teddy Hall down to “a moment of frivolity, not malice.”

“The JCR obviously does not condone racism, homophobia or anti-Semitism. We are very tolerant,” Nanwani said. “I want to stress that we have every respect for St Edmund Hall.”
He added that he was confident there would be no disciplinary action taken against students involved and that the Dean was to send an email to all St Peter’s freshers warning them about their conduct.

The Dean of the college, Dr. Roger Allen, who was unaware of the incident until it was brought to his attention by Cherwell, said that, “St Peter’s takes a very serious view of any offensive behaviour on the part of its students”, and that the President “has the College’s full confidence and support in the way he and the JCR committee are dealing with this incident.”

He said that he has since discussed the incident with the Junior Deans and the JCR President.

 

Burglars raid three colleges

Three colleges have fallen victim to thieves in a spate of burglaries this week, including the loss of a widescreen television from St Anne’s JCR.

Students were astonished as they entered the common room to discover that the enormous TV had vanished.

JCR President George Kynaston informed the college by email and offered a day of amnesty on Monday to anyone returning the TV.

He said, “I’m hoping this was someone in the JCR just being stupid and that we can get the TV back without any trouble.”

No information has been forthcoming, but he dismissed the idea that it may have been an outside theft, saying, “it would be pretty tricky to smuggle that TV past the
porters lodge.”

College authorities are currently studying CCTV footage and police may get involved.

An intruder, believed to be from outside of college, also broke into a student’s room in St Peter’s college.

The incident took place on the 8th of October between 6.00 pm and 2.30 am, while the student was out. The burglar was caught on CCTV scaling a wall. Investigations are ongoing.

St. Peter’s JCR president Sanjay Nanwani maintains that the college has “acted promptly” and that members of the JCR have been kept “regularly informed of developments”.

He confirmed that he is certain that “the necessary steps will be taken to ensure the integrity and security of [their] premises.”

Jessica Davies, a second year who lived last year on the staircase where the theft took place, said, “I never had any concerns about security at St. Peter’s and I’m confident it was only a one-off.”

Theft also hit LHM, with the loss of a laptop at around 8pm on the 7th of October. This follows a series of burglaries in the Jericho area over the previous few days.

Five of the incidents resulted from students not locking their doors properly or in some cases leaving them open.
Thames Valley Police are currently investigating whether this incident is linked with several other thefts of jewellery, iPods, laptops, digital cameras, cash and even champagne.

Deputy Sergeant Marc Tarbit, who leads the Oxford Burglary team, issued the following statement, “we seem to have at least one person targeting properties in the Jericho area and some Jericho residents have made the burglar’s job far easier for them.”

The police have urged all students to make sure that their doors and windows are secure before they leave the house.

 

The Live Wire: Enter Shikari

Since their last appearance in Oxford two years ago, Enter Shikari have burst onto the music scene with the release last March of debut album Take to the Skies. Now the St. Albans-based quartet’s chaotic blend of trance and hardcore has become more than just an underground fad.

Enter Shikari take this opportunity to showcase material from their newly recorded album, with five previously unreleased songs, even at the expense of first single ‘Anything Can Happen in the Next Half Hour’, and fan favourite ‘Jonny Sniper’.

The new songs reveal some interesting additions to the mix; ‘The Jester’ opens with a flute melody over a swinging jazz beat, before descending into a screaming, guitar heavy midsection, which seamlessly segues into a happy hardcore crescendo.

The band are slow to get into their stride – the frequency of new material early on in the set-list seems to slow down the night. Enter Shikari are at their best when they have the whole room singing, screaming or shouting the words back at them.

When they get going though, they really get going – ‘Labyrinth’ sees frontman Rou Reynolds careering across the stage, whipping the crowd into vicious circle pits. There are more melodic moments too: ‘Return to Energiser’ ends with a slow sing-a-long, the audience waving glow-sticks.

Their fusion of hardcore screams, trance sections and singable choruses may sound like a bad idea on paper, and like a bit of a mess to the untrained ear, but playing live is where Enter Shikari really shine – their live show is an exhilarating experience.

 

A grand old man and his dog

‘This is probably the worst fucking work I’ve done in my whole life – although there has been some real bullshit’. The scene doesn’t seem to be going well. Despite the precision of the actors, despite their sheer willingness to listen and be directed, Walcott isn’t happy.

Winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1992, Walcott has been feted since his emergence onto the poetry scene more than fifty years ago. Hailing from St. Lucia, Walcott is at the forefront of the Caribbean’s cultural identity, and is a world-respected artist in his own right.

Wandering back and forth from his chair to the acting space, his large frame seems weighed down with age. His white trainers squeak across the parquet flooring.

Far from revelling in his fame and extraordinary success he shrinks from talking to us. While his actors chat and joke with us, he remains silent. Until, unprompted, he says ‘You’re from Oxford? There’s a university there as well?’ A wide grin stretches across his wrinkled face, before he recedes to his chair.

The room is grand, but battered. This is not the sandy beaches of Walcott’s epic Omeros, nor the Thebes of Sophocles’ Antigone. It is Woolwich Town Hall, and we are at a rehearsal of Derek Walcott and Peter Manning’s current operatic production of Heaney’s The Burial at Thebes.

Several hours after arriving, we are finally given the chance to talk to Walcott. He’s less than pleased. In fact he’s thoroughly annoyed. It is safe to say that all of our fantasies of inspirational, generous poetic genius are shattered.

A few minutes later, Walcott returns. Grumpy, certainly, but calmer, he asks whether he can eat his lunch during the interview. We, overly enthusiastic, offer to ‘wait until later, if it’s more convenient?’.

It isn’t. And so we begin. First he wants to know whether we are going ‘to ask a load of dumb questions’. We are, after all, from Oxford.

But the play, the play, we protest, what about the play? ‘Tyranny is an eternal thing’, he muses. Well. Fine then. It is the humanity of the Antigone, the terrible relevance of the play, which has captured him.

Originally written by Sophocles, it recounts the tale of the martyr Antigone, whose brother Polyneices is denied burial by the dictatorial Creon. Adapted by Seamus Heaney into an epic poem in 2004, Antigone has been transmuted into operatic form, by the highly acclaimed Dominique le Gendre, the first woman to compose for the Royal Opera House.

Combining the work of two Nobel Prize winners, the rising talent of le Gendre and the skill of conductor Peter Manning, this is a project of stunning proportions. Premièring at the Globe last weekend to awful reviews, it is clearly also a contentious project.

Walcott has decided to relocate the play from Grecian Thebes to a failing Latin American republic, avoiding what he terms the ‘cliché’ of the Middle East. He is painfully aware of the violence which has disfigured Latin America. This project, hailed as a triumph of cultural diversity by the national press, is not about difference but about universality and unity.

Latin America, he tells us, is ‘my choice, my interpretation’, but ‘if you put it in China, Africa, it’ll all work’. ‘The reality of it is that it is nothing to do with being Greek, or being Colombian. The ultimate thing is the horror which comes upon a family. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter what context it is in.’

But the play, the poem, and now the opera, are not to do with aesthetics, or an enjoyable experience for the audience. ‘It’s a context of violence set against a background of considerable beauty’ he adds. The portrayal of violence is something which concerns him; because ‘the horrible thing is, sometimes, violence can become a cliché’.

His ideas for direction struggle against this truism, and he focuses upon the image of ‘a dead dog at the side of the street, or in the middle of the road. You don’t see dead dogs in the street in Europe, in England, in London’.

It is a picture intimately connected with the Latin American setting, and has a powerful and defamiliarising potency. ‘If you substitute a dead dog for Polyneices, that’s what he wanted Polyneices to be’. It’s about the visceral, the brutal and the putrescent.

‘That putrescence is central to the play, and that putrescence doesn’t really have anything to do with Greek columns, or Greek architecture…’ ‘The greatest literature happens when there is a crisis of faith in that society’, Walcott adds.

It is the faith of the audience which interests him. They cannot believe in Greek gods, in passionless acting and old bits of marble. So we must access ‘the reality not of the gods, but of a dead dog in the street, rotting; there’s been too much horror not to start there.’

Modern drama fails to confront that sense of tragedy, he feels. ‘Instead of poetry, you get neurosis… it’s not poetry, it’s a clinical, psychological thing.’ But ‘the classic is instant, the classic is now.’

We move on to questions about the operatic nature of the production. What, we ask, does the music bring to the play? Walcott shakes his head fiercely. ‘It’s not what it brings to it, you have to think of it simultaneously’. The music, he says, ‘should be simultaneous, it should be synonymous, with the text’. Peter Manning, conductor and musical director, emphasises this point further, and talks at length about the intimacy of the relationship between verse and music.

But, he stresses, it is the task of any sincere musician to fight against the cliché of ‘the poetry of music, rather than the poetic in music’. One of the major musicians and conductors of his age, Manning he is trying to ‘create a new structure’, through his company, Manning Camerata, and to act ‘to engage at a different level’. ‘That you have to create the poetic is the challenge for any performing artist’, he says.

A refreshed looking chorus have returned from their lunch break. The cast are winding up for an arduous afternoon, but they are laughing, and smiling. We gather our things, and go to leave.

‘How are we getting back to Oxford?’ Walcott enquires. ‘By coach’, we reply. ‘Coach? You have to drop such an archaic word…A coach, several horses…’ he laughs. And a smile finally slashes across his wrinkled face.

 

Greenbox: Desperate for Development?

Over recent years Development in Oxford has galloped towards its precarious financial situation today. All along the canalside increasingly tall expensive blocks of flats tower over local Victorian terraced housing. Jericho Boatyard, operating for over 100 years, was evicted and sealed off by British Waterways, intent on selling it for £4,000,000.

The recent wave of unbridled economic growth has swept aside important landmarks such as a grade II* central Oxford railway building, and a much loved Dickensian ironworks foundry near Port Meadow. The Green Party views these land and buildings as assets to be held in the public domain rather than sold to the private sector.

For example, when Lib Dem, Labour and Tory members supported the proposal to expand the Westgate centre into a giant car-dependent shopping mall, the Greens actively opposed it and by placing one legal challenge after another in its way, delayed it until the credit crunch has it lying wounded, unable to raise the funding to begin work on the site.

Greens argue that pieces of land like this could be developed on a local, human scale like the Lanes in Brighton, with small business units and flats above them, a community centre and some public space. This would regenerate the area, but would not make Oxford so competitive economically in the SE region, which is what successive government policies would have us do. Oxford University gets involved too as a major landowner.

The University’s proposals are usually eventually passed, but the City Council has also rejected plans such as the University’s proposal to build a book depository on a flood plain that has recently flooded, and was thus opposed by local residents and Councillors. This was eventually defeated at Public Inquiry, and a new site will now have to be found for University books.

One of the biggest hurdles to democracy in Oxford is the way public consultations on large planning proposals are carried out. First, the plans are made and nearly set in stone by an ‘in principle’ agreement to accept them. Then, the public are presented with a proposal which is put to them as what ‘will’ happen.

Everyone acts as though at some point a decision had been made, so that when the decision comes to be formally made, it is a foregone conclusion that few local politicians would dare oppose. Suddenly large developments are going to be stalled for an indefinite period, and we are all going to have to think differently about economic growth and competitiveness, because the ‘credit crunch’ heralds a new way of thinking about the purpose of developments and how we use our land.

 

The return of the LBD…

Models: Georgie Bloomfield, Emma Radford
Photographer: Tom Wild
Stylists: Rebecca Johnson, Sam Losey

Bangles, velvet and satin mini-dress and
caped mini-dress: all from Reign, 136 Cowley
Road (01865 250004)

Lace dress: Zara, Clarendon Centre
All make-up by MAC

Shoes and sunglasses: stylist’s own

Advice

I have a lump in my scrotum. I don’t have a regular partner, but I do have quite a lot of sex, and no-one has said anything. I don’t think that this is an STI but I am worried.
Graduate Student, St John’s.

The Delphic Oracle’s wisdom, Know thyself, is imperative advice. It’s impossible to offer medical advice by letter, but if you notice something for heaven’s sake, swallow your embarrassment and – to put it bluntly – have the balls to see a doctor immediately.

It could be many things, but let’s cut to the source of your fear and face the very worst possibility – the risk (rather obviously!) of testicular cancer in a man’s lifetime is about 0.4%, but it is most common in men in the student age range (well, 15 – 35 actually); but it has the highest cure rates of all cancers, virtually 100% if there are no secondaries. But early diagnosis is imperative. However nervous or embarrassed you feel, there really is no alternative to acting now…

I am a law undergraduate doing well and looking forward to a career – I have found that I’m in the very early stages of pregnancy, my boyfriend doesn’t know, and I think he will not see the issue as a problem, but as something to be dealt with. I’m not entirely sure.

I think that a lot of stuff about a foetus being a little person is sentimental, but I am a conscientious vegetarian and a pacifist and I have real qualms about what I suspect will be the inevitable end in a termination of the pregnancy.

I don’t want to waste the support and encouragement of my family who always went the extra mile, but I don’t want to worry them, I am supposed to be an adult after all. I don’t even want advice, but I do want to make a choice which I can live with.
ANON

Thank you for entrusting your story – we are not revealing college and have changed some detail to protect you. First, you are already an informed, thoughtful and reflective person with the rights and responsibility to make a decision that is so important, because you have to live with it.

I am sure that your friends and family will support you, and seek to advise you, but the decision has to be yours. I think that you are trying to make an informed and realistic choice about your life, and you’re right that you have to make the decisions. But that doesn’t mean that you have to face them alone.

You say that you haven’t yet told your boyfriend: he may well have certain expectations, but I hope that together you can face some of the things that face you over the next few weeks. Whatever the outcome, facing the issues together is a really important part of your relationship. I’d guess he will be well-aware of your approaches to life and I hope that he will be utterly supportive.

You write about wanting to protect your family – no doubt they would want to do exactly the same for you – obviously I don’t know your family details, but I suspect that if they have been supportive of you thus far, that’s not going to evaporate at a time when you need them very acutely.

There are also people you can talk to at different levels of anonymity – from student help lines, College nurses, doctors, and welfare provision in your College. People generally are trustworthy, unshocked and proactively supportive.

These structures can help you now, and sustain you whatever your choices. Most of all, treat yourself as tenderly and generously as you do your own friends, there is no easy answer, but with the support of those who love you, you do not have to face the decisions you have to make quickly without support.

I’m a cheat. I copy stuff for term essays, smuggle things into collections and am struggling hard to keep everything together – I haven’t been caught, but I am terrified of finals that are like a dark cloud on the horizon.

I get pissed a lot, and have been in trouble with my College because of that – but they haven’t a clue about how stupid and inadequately prepared I am, and I’m depressed that no one has caught me – or even seems to care.

My family want me to succeed and have invested a lot of time and money in my education. I don’t have a long-term meaningful relationship, and I don’t really want one – I get around, but I feel everything is going to crumble.

ANON

This is a very honest letter. Wherever you are there isn’t a place where you can’t make a choice. You clearly feel hemmed in, and it might be worthwhile pretty soon to talk to a doctor about how you are feeling.

But let’s move to the substance of your letter. Cheating – plagiarism if you like – is a sign, above all, of a lack of self-confidence. You didn’t say whether you cheated for your A-levels, but you must have got AAA (or thereabouts).

At any rate, smuggling stuff into Collections is crazy and unnecessary, and sounds almost like a deliberate attempt to be caught. Taking a paper and not doing well may get you a robust response at Academic Review or from your Tutor – but it sounds from your letter as if that’s really what you want – to be caught out, or at least ‘known’ well enough so that you can be taken seriously.

Seriously, your College would care very much indeed, so dare not to cheat, and go to talk with your tutor if she or he is close enough to you, or someone else in your College’s welfare structure who is committed to being confidential and they will support and challenge you.

This is something your Chaplain, for example, will be skilled, and no-doubt experienced, in dealing with. I don’t know any Chaplain who’d tell you to be good and sing a hymn, by the way… If you’ve been in trouble with your College for alcohol related offenses, they are probably aware that there is some problem, and your raising it would be counted very much in your favour.

However generous it was of your parents to spend time and money in getting you here, you’re not their FTSE investment – and they’d be pretty wounded, I suspect, if they thought you reckoned that they only spent the money to get you to Oxford to succeed ‘for them’. Of course they want you to have the chance to make the best decisions for your life, but don’t let a misplaced sense of debt oppress you.

Restaurant Review: Gino’s

It’s a cold and misty dusk; the sun beams between the dreamy spires of our wonderful academic hell as Jamie Oliver strolls anonymously through the streets of Oxford. Hungry for hearty Italian food after a hard day moralising, Jamie is loathe to join the ridiculously long queue in front of his own restaurant, sidesteps it, and where does he go? To the quiet authenticity of Gino’s.

He is, after all, a man of taste. Jamie Oliver’s attempt to introduce an ethical restaurant to the franchise wasteland of Oxford may have deteriorated into a temple dedicated to the cult of celebrity, but if you stray just a little from the monotony of George street, there is hope. Not the revolutionary hope of a figure-heading charitable establishment but the bleary-eyed nostalgic kind of hope, wishing for a time when restaurants weren’t controlled by anonymous corporations or idealistic celebrities.

Jamie’s vision of championing excellent student fare at an ‘affordable’ price is collapsing under the weight of its own self-satisfaction. Somewhere in the misty planes of admirable idealism something was forgotten; skilful cooking. Worse than not having quality ingredients is butchering quality ingredients; that’s why, this time, we went to Gino’s.

Gino’s isn’t conceptual or branded; it doesn’t have a colour scheme, only bandy legged tables and reasonable food. It almost feels like stepping back in time to a traditional Italian family restaurant, where parmesan and freshly ground pepper fall onto plates of perfectly cooked Italian fare, made from fresh ingredients oozing the vitality of the Mediterranean sun. In the cold light of day, however, this fantasy is replaced by the assault of bus fumes and noise from the Oxford tube station opposite, which somehow insidiously seeps into the food and makes Gino’s more appealing for lunch than dinner.

The menu reads as Jamie Oliver would have wanted his to, before his dissent into the Jamie-Brand. There’s antipasti, pasta and pizza with a selection of meat dishes that sing out from the page with pure Italian accents. Political correctness and fears about cruelty take a backseat to taste, with an extensive veal selection.

As an exvegetarian with a soft streak for baby animals, it was not to my liking, but it definitely appealed to the desensitised guy I dined with, who simply stated, “It’s their own damn fault for being so delicious!” Trying to
hide the fact that I had been so busy talking that I hadn’t even glanced at the menu (Gino’s is the kind of place where the soft chrome tone acts as a lubricant for conversation and intimacy), I had a look at the specials board and picked a crab ravioli with cherry tomato sauce.

The crab filling was dense with a surprisingly appealing texture and, best of all, encased in perfectly al dente fresh pasta. The sauce was freshly made and enlivened with bursts of whole roasted cherry tomatoes, sweet and caramelized from being given enough time to cook slowly.

A lasagne and pork tortellini with cream sauce were also ordered, and were well executed enough to be indulgent and satisfying. Only the pizza caused any disappointment, a traditional thin and crispy base had been superseded by something thicker, which was a real shame. I was more than consoled by the desserts however: the gelato icecream was as good as any in Italy, with a good selection of flavours and the tiramisu was a hefty slab of creamy mascarpone. Better yet was the bill, with prices as nostalgic as the ambience, it came to under £10 a head for two courses. I’m sure Jamie would approve.

 

94 Gloucester Green

PRICE: £10 for two courses
IN A WORD: Pukka

Plucky Blues confident of victory

Following the 7-3 pre-season defeat to the Amateur Football Alliance the omens didn’t look too rosy for the OUAFC team pulling away from pre-season. However, there were positives to come out of the game including a notable hat-trick from pacy vice-captain Alex Toogood, and signs of promising attacking play which will give the new coaching setup of Mickey Lewis and Phill Heath encouragement.

Having topped their league for the last three seasons, but only managed one promotion due to playoff defeats, the dark blues will be looking to be in the race for the Midlands division 1 title. However, the opening league encounter should prove a real test against a Warwick side who narrowly defeated Oxford last November.

Looking further forward, captain Tom Wherry will be able to draw on the experience of no fewer than 11 of last year’s 16 man Varsity squad, which will surely prove to be a huge bonus and Toogood will once again be key to providing the goals up front. The departure of Nik Baker and the rise of David Robinson to coach of the Centaurs has left the door open for a new goalkeeper to establish himself within the first eleven.

The fierce competition to fill the role lies between Bahamas international Dwayne Whylly and the reserve goalkeeper for last season’s Varsity, Nic Ielpo. Although the latter was given the nod in last week’s friendly, he endured a torrid evening between the posts.

Of course, several other freshers and college veterans have joined up with the University squad, some with impressive footballing credentials, but only time will tell of their impact as the pack is shuffled and new faces thrown into the mix. The one area Wherry will certainly be looking to strengthen is in defence, with five of the six centre-backs from last season moving on. The ever-solid presence of Toby Hodgson will surely be pivotal to any success this season, although his three week spell on the sidelines through tendonitis could be very damaging for the beginning of the season.

As for the Centaurs, the sideways movement from Midlands division 3A to 3B to face new opposition this season makes it tricky know quite how the final standings will pan out. The change in the coaching setup should prove highly benefitial though and the target has been firmly set at pushing for promotion in order to better last year’s mid-table finish.

The Centaurs are in a tough retention situation relative to the Blues with only a handful of players returning. Naturally, there will be a lot of movement between the two sides within the first few weeks, and this is an exciting period as the squads settle their foundations and players strive to hold down places or make the step up.

The shining example of Wherry forcing himself into first team contention and onto club captain after a string of impressive Centaur performances, can only serve to motivate the current crop to emulate his rise.

All in all the injury table statistics will not be a significant worry for Lewis, with just four players currently unavailable, and with a fully-fit squad, the teams must look very strong on paper. There can be little doubt that the blues engine will be tough to halt en route to a fourth consecutive title.

 

Interview: Stephen Fry

In an office in the bowels of Oxford’s Waterstones, I am attempting to present
myself as knowledgeable and witty, a feat made rather difficult by the fact that the man sitting across the table from me is Stephen Fry, knowledge and wit personified.

The stack of books that shrinks ever smaller as Fry signs each one is made up of his new travel book, Stephen Fry in America, documenting his long drive across every state in America.

His idea for the book stems from a childhood memory of when he would muse upon the life of Steve, the American boy who would have existed instead of Stephen, if only his father had accepted a job at Princeton. This boy wore jeans and T shirts instead of grey shorts and plimsolls, and listened to music instead of reading poetry. Essentially then, Steve was all-American cool, and Stephen was just a little bit scared of his imaginary counterpart.

I wonder, then, if Fry was equally scared of this proposed mission, this journey into the good old U S of A. He instantly accepts this suggestion; “there was an element of trepidation. One is concerned with the possibility of disappointment; the disappointment in the scenery, in the people, in the rudeness of people.”

For Fry, this mission was about dispelling the myths that the British believe about American people and he freely admits that ‘there was a fear that there would be a confirmation of the prejudices that we have. Plus, there was the personal fear, those which effect us all; “Am I doing my job properly?” or “Am I taking good enough notes”. So yes, there was an element of fear.”

It is easy to forget that Stephen Fry, renowned for his intelligence, is of course a very funny man. As we converse, his publicist silently answers the phone over his shoulder. For a moment Fry looks confused as to where a muffled voice is coming from, and on seeing the phone looks relieved. “Oh good,” he says, “I thought it was God telling me to kill again.”

Trying to experience all fifty states, Fry took part in a vast range of activities, which caused a conundrum of conscience on several occasions. When hunting in New York state, whaling in Alaska, practising witchcraft in Massachusetts and voodoo in Louisiana, did he struggle to observe ways of life that he found morally dubious? “You’ve hit the nail on the head there,”

Fry begins, “because I feel slightly hypocritical. I’m a bit less kind in the book, whereas on the show I have to sort of play along.”

A stark example of this difficulty of holding his tongue was found in Oregon, where a gun-toting doctor of psychology presented his case for the existence of Bigfoot.

Fry exclaims, “I thought he was preposterous! I was a bit unkind to him though! I mean, frankly they’re all silly, but at least witches don’t have homophobic beliefs and are obviously nicer to women! So really I have more respect for witchcraft than for Christianity. But it was difficult! I’m a rationalist, or an empiricist perhaps.”

Despite his lack of religion, Fry was welcomed into almost every strain of Christianity, and was perhaps most charmed by a group of young Mormon men being photographed for a topless calendar in Nevada. I found this concept seriuosly bizarre, and Fry is in agreement; “well, you’ve got the scoop there; I found out that the guy who organised it has been practically excommunicated from the church. They decided that he was bringing the faith into disrepute. He asked me to intercede on his behalf, but…” He pauses. Who knows what the head of the Mormon Church would say if Stephen Fry called to give his thoughts on the matter.

Shortly before our interview began, Fry and I were stopped by an elderly Indian woman who insisted she was a huge fan of his movies. In Colorado, some children knew him instantly from his supporting role in V for Vendetta. As a man who has written books, starred in films, presented quiz shows (the list goes on), I ask if he is surprised when others recognise him because of the film.

“Yes it does,” he says, “you never know what it’s going to be. Some people will say “I just love Peter’s Friends, or that Bright Young Things (Fry’s sole foray into directing) is their favourite film. And then there’ll be people who’ve never seen the films but have read my books, and so obviously that’s very nice.”

Now that the American quest is over, what’s next for Stephen Fry? Currently working on the screenplay for a Dambusters remake, he’s well in to the writing process; “I’ve done three drafts, and Peter Jackson is working on the action draft. He can write it out like a verbal storyboard as quickly as I can do the dialogue.” Fry is clearly excited to be working with Jackson, and I ask how such a collaboration came about. “It’s actually his project. David Frost bought the rights and got Jackson on board, and he gave me a call. Naturally I was very excited.”

After breaking his arm filming in Brazil for another new travel-based series, he is off to Africa to continue where he left off. “Then,” Fry says, gladly, “December off”. “Completely off?” I question. “Well, I have some writing to do…” Clearly there is no rest for the wicked.

We are interrupted briefly as the manager of Waterstones, whose office we are using, pops in to offer us a coffee. Stephen appreciates the offer, but would prefer some red wine. A bottle of Bordeaux emerges from nowhere, and the wine is poured. After a quick pause for refreshments, I ask if he enjoys events like this; book signings, publicity drives and interviews with precocious student journalists; “I do, very much.”

“I could live in the strange bubble of publicists, writers, journalists and other
such people”, he continues, “Not to meet them would be a pity. It’s interesting to see how things have changed. Students used to have posters of Che Guevara and Jimi Hendrix on their walls. Now they have Albert Einstein and Oscar Wilde. It used to be about politics, the message. Now it’s about the mind.”

Clearly Fry is all about mind over message. As the interview comes to a close, it is clear that the most intelligent man on television is also the most pleasant that this precocious student journalist has ever come across. If he’s faking it, then he’s a better actor than most give him credit for.