Sunday, April 20, 2025
Blog Page 602

UCU organises “rally” in support of suspended Ruskin College union representative

0

The Unirsity and College Union (UCU) organised a rally following the suspension of their representative at Ruskin College, Dr Humber on Monday 1 April by the Principal of Ruskin College, Paul Di Felice.

The exact reasons for his suspension were not revealed to Cherwell. The UCU alleged the charges were false, and also linked the suspension to the “recent overwhelming vote of no confidence in the Principal by Ruskin College UCU branch.”

In their press release, the UCU stated: “[the suspension] comes at a time when Ruskin College is supposed to be celebrating its 120th anniversary as a college that has strong links with the labour and trade union movement in Britain and internationally.

“UCU is calling for the immediate reinstatement of Dr Lee Humber and for the bogus charges against Lee to be dropped.”

The Business Development Manager at Ruskin, Nicki O’Shea, told Cherwell: “Further to the press release from the local branch of UCU, Ruskin College would like to clarify that the information contained therein is factually incorrect and represents the views of a small percentage of college staff.

“The issues referred to are not connected and, as they relate to internal matters, the College has no further comment to make on this.”

The union organised a “rally” to be held outside the College at 1pm on Wednesday 3 April.

The Chair of Ruskin College UCU Desmond McDermott told Cherwell: “The meeting is part of the campaign to reinstate Dr Lee Humber who is a member of Ruskin College UCU branch and a trade union representative.”

Members of Oxford’s Socialist Worker’s Party turned out to support the reinstatement.

Founded in 1899, Ruskin College is an independent educational institution affiliated to the university.

Jordan Peele’s new horror film ‘Us’

0

The idiom, “To be afraid of one’s own shadow,” normally forms part of an insult, a derogatory phrase denoting child-like cowardice. The characters of Jordan Peele’s Us, however, are given every reason to fear their very reflections, as they are pursued by homicidal doppelgänger versions of themselves known as ‘the Tethered’. Nonetheless, the impact of the jump-scares are dulled by comedic moments and a catchy soundtrack which features artists from Janelle Monáe to the Beach Boys. This, combined with the film’s jumbled explanation of the doppelgänger phenomenon results in the predator’s resemblance to their victims becoming little more than a gimmick: a light twist on the conventional zombie genre.

This isn’t to say that this gimmick does not add an interesting angle to the film. The camera lingers on characters studying their faces in mirrors and in the fainter, more spectral reflections offered by dark windows. Peele touches on the relationship between the physical manifestation of the self and the psychological, perhaps making a comment on the fact that we can sometimes be scared of the unknown within ourselves. However, the pace of this movie is dictated by thrills rather than by deep introspection, and philosophical points, though brushed upon for aesthetic sake, are not developed.

The aesthetics of Us are visually striking. Doppelgängers are easily distinguished from main characters by their blood-red jumpsuits, oversize scissors and generally creepy countenances. A recurring location motif is that of the fairground. What is it about fairgrounds, ostensibly places of fun and divertissement, which makes them such popular settings for horror? In recent years we’ve seen scary scenes play out in fairgrounds in Silent Hill: Revelation, American Horror Story: Hotel, Zombieland – even the lighter-hearted Love, Simon features a moment of tension atop a Ferris wheel when the protagonist’s date almost ditches them. Perhaps, it is the dizzying effect of the bright lights and garish colours. Perhaps, it is the fine line between excitement and fear that fuels the energy of an adrenaline rush. Perhaps, it is the dual nature of fair ride machines – they can rise us up to unforeseen heights, but also plummet us down again. Claw and slot machines offer the prospect of toys and goodies to be won, but also the potential to lose large sums of money. Perhaps there is something about the human psyche that cannot accept that all the fun and games offered at a fair can come without a price; that all play and no work can lead to disturbing results – as Pinocchio and his friends discovered when their funfair paradise turned to pack-mule misery. Or perhaps I’m just massively overthinking all of this.

The creaky structures of the fairground aren’t the only unreliable machines in this film. Peele also illuminates the failings of modern technology to keep us safe. Phones, back-up generators, cars and ‘Ophelia’ (a parody of Amazon’s ‘Alexa’) are of less protection against the ‘Tethered’ than the defence of fire and saucepans. The way in which the film’s title is displayed on its cinema posters renders its similarity to the name of the North American state in which it is set quite obvious. When the ‘Tethered’ identity is questioned, Lupita Nyong’o’s alter ego proclaims “We are… Americans.” Similarly, copious reference is made to the 1986 charity event ‘Hands across America’. The meanings behind these parodies of patriotism remain a little indecipherable, at least to this Irish reviewer, but that doesn’t mean it’s not fun to guess at their potential significance. Indeed, fun is the ingredient at the heart of this film. Not everything might make total, perfect sense, not everything might seem as refreshing and original as was perhaps intended, but there are enough thrills, chills and spills to make up for that.

Us will inevitably be compared to Peele’s recent Oscar winner Get Out – one could argue that a film following the runaway success of such a hit may be doomed to live ‘in its shadow’. Yet, Us is also wacky and entertaining enough to be an enjoyable romp on its own merit.

University has “not taken decision” on revoking Sultan of Brunei’s honorary degree, despite pressure from SU

0

The University has resisted demands by the Student Union to strip the Sultan of Brunei, Hassanal Bolkiaj, of his honorary doctorate.

Speaking to Cherwell, a spokesperson for the university said “We share the international condemnation of Brunei’s new penal code and back the United Nations’ call to stop the code entering into force.

“At present, the University has not taken any decision on rescinding the Sultan of Brunei’s 1993 Honorary Degree of Civil Law by Diploma.”

Oxford awarded Bolkiah an honorary degree of civil law by diploma in 1993. In this role as Sultan, he functions as head of state and prime minister, and is the second longest-serving monarch in the world.

A spokesperson for the University earlier told PinkNews that “at present, the University will not be rescinding the Sultan of Brunei’s 1993 Honorary Degree of Civil Law by Diploma.”

“We share the international condemnation of Brunei’s new penal code and back the United Nations’ call to stop the code entering into force.”

In a Facebook post, the SU stated: “All honorary doctorates should reflect the ethos of the University. We want to create a safe and inclusive society for all and the people who receive this type of honour should be held to a high standard.

“If they fail to meet that, as in this case, they should be stripped of their honour. We have written to the Vice Chancellor to ask them to remove the degree.”

The Sultan’s new laws prescribe death by stoning for sodomy and adultery. Other laws that will be introduced include amputation for thieves, and flogging for abortion. It is believed that these new laws come under the Sultan’s wish to adopt some of the tougher elements of Islamic religious law.

“I want to see Islamic teachings in this country grow stronger,” Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah said in a public address, according to AFP news agency. There was no mention of the strict new interpretation of Sharia, or Islamic law.

Bolkiah first stated his intention to introduce sharia law to the country in 2013.

Other universities have been quick to review accolades they have given to Bolkiah, including King’s College London and the University of Aberdeen.

A University of Aberdeen spokesperson told PinkNews: “The University of Aberdeen is inclusive and open to all.

“In light of this new information this matter will be raised as a matter of urgency with the University’s Honorary Degrees Committee.”

King’s College London has also confirmed that the university will review an honorary degree it gave to the sultan eight years ago.

Oxford SU has been contacted for comment.

This article was amended on the 3rd April to clarify that the university had yet to make a formal decision.

Hartnell’s ‘Bodies’: Hugely readable

0

‘To have no head revealed more than anything a deep-seated and particularly un-Christian streak of sinfulness.’ So concludes the first section of Jack Hartnell’s hugely readable history of the human body in medieval art and artefacts. Medieval Bodies has recently been published in paperback, which is good news for the student bank account; we can also be cheerful that the illustrations, thanks to modern strides in softcover printing, are all to the same standard of colour and detail as they were in hardback. Hartnell has avoided the fate, which some may remember, of Christopher de Hamel’s Meetings with Remarkable Manuscripts, whose transition to an affordable format meant a downgrade to black-and-white image reproductions. Here, they are of a fantastic quality, and enormously enhance the experience.

Hartnell’s headless heathens are the Blemmyae, mythical islanders with faces in their chests; for several centuries they thronged the illustrated margins of European manuscripts, threatening from the outskirts – just as they were thought to dwell at the edge of the world itself, and roam its unexplored archipelagos. Taking one such illustration as his prompt, Hartnell broadens his scope to examine the human head, and its absence, in the iconography, literature, philosophy, and medicine of one thousand years of European and Eastern tradition. In each chapter, he does the same with a lower body-part, until arriving at the feet, and his conclusion. A wealth of images accompanies a fact-packed text. Medieval Bodies is not a long book, and if this sounds like far too much to cram in, you won’t necessarily have revised that view upon finishing it. 

However, you will probably find yourself won over. Hartnell’s stated purpose, to strip away the prejudices of subsequent centuries and get to the bottom of ‘what medieval life was really like’, is not to be taken seriously. While claiming to avoid generalisations about the Middle Ages, he is forced to generalise relentlessly, skipping back and forth between the tenth century and the sixteenth, Christianity and Islam; while wishing to debag the notion of a dreary, ignorant Dark Age, he indulges in plenty of gruesome detail. Beheadings, eviscerations, martyrdoms, sawings-off of diseased limbs – all common fare. However (unlike its hordes of dead people), there is nothing to mourn in this: Hartnell selects a wealth of the most gripping material, balanced by a trove of visual esoterica, and then takes us through it, combining intellectual seriousness with great lightness of touch. I read it after a term of scholarly reading, and blinked with disoriented enjoyment at the resultant breath of fresh air.

The body-parts framework is simple but strong: thirty pages on the medieval attitude to skin gives way to the same on bones, then another on the heart, and monotony is thereby banished without trace. The various members are treated as physical – subject to disease, surgery, artistic representation or literary description – but also metonymic. Among numerous others, Hartnell discusses the evolution of ♥ to symbolise love in medieval iconography; the figuration of the English King as ‘head’ of state (who would often be-head people); and the timeless tradition of representing Death as a cheeky, upwardly mobile skeleton. One illustration commemorates a deliciously macabre practise in fifteenth-century Western Europe, in an ivory rosary bead of two lovers kissing. The posing skeleton pressed up behind them is only visible from the back, his banner reading ‘recognise in me what you will soon be’. Rosary beads were made to be turned over by the fingers during prayer, so that each devotion would unearth this memento mori at unremitting intervals. As Hartnell says, ‘the violence and impending doom of medieval bones seem to have met the eye uncomfortably often.’

At its strongest, the book essentially consists of such vignettes. In his exploration of the hands, we are told of the medieval manuals on chiromancy which advised that ‘a doubled “oo” sign’ in the wrinkles of a man’s palm ‘suggested an imminent loss of testicles for the bearer or his younger brother.’ Science before the Renaissance had not described the blood’s circulation, but a whole judicial method was established around its cruentation: the belief that a corpse would start to bleed afresh in its murderer’s presence. The stomach, meanwhile, leads Hartnell on to a colourful story, from the Old Icelandic saga of Egill, about one of the organ’s most direct uses; Egill is so disgusted with his host’s bad hospitality that he vomits into his face, ‘so that Ármóðr approached suffocation.’ In a more austere history this would pass for unsavoury relief, but Hartnell rests for not a moment; a page later we have read an Anglo-Saxon riddle about the anus, and been transported to the twelfth-century court of Henry II – which ‘boasted one Roland the Farter, paid handsomely for amusing the royals’. Hartnell avoids mugging these examples up, however, and his wit is dry and sparing. I defy anyone not to learn much they didn’t know, and be thoroughly entertained.

His tone is not faultless. Hartnell’s wide-eyed, non-judgemental tone sometimes veers too far into the simplistic, resulting in accidentally funny moments of banality. He sometimes concludes that the eyes were used in the Middle Ages to see with, or the feet to walk with, while ‘Hands in the Middle Ages let the world in. Their touch gave shape to experiences and objects’ – as if this somehow lets the reader into anything. Elsewhere he is overready to sentimentalise about attitudes too. Blood ‘warped from the flowing stuff of life into fuel for racial hatred and division across the continent,’ he writes, leadenly. On the flipside, the grave of ‘Anna, mother of Grisanto’ in Palermo may bear a quadrilingual inscription, but can this one example from Sicily in 1149 be exploded into a ‘sign of medieval multicultural sensibilities’? This feels like a wishful whitewash. 

The only sustained disappointment, though, is the chapter on genitals, which I was looking forward to after all the gleeful trivia about the medieval anus. Hartnell instead abandons his mission to undermine preconceptions about the past, in favour of an information-light newsflash on the medieval oppression of women. The already well-established fact that women a millennium ago were disenfranchised and their bodies objectified is given another lick of paint – plus a totally unhelpful diagnosis of ‘severe castration anxiety among medieval men’ due to the womb’s hollowness, which surely won’t do. The best part is a painting, by a husband-and-wife manuscript team in fourteenth-century Paris, of two nuns picking penises off a tree and stuffing them into their pockets. Mind you, that would stand out under any circumstances.

The reader who goes in having already studied some aspect of the world before 1500 will not find their paradigm shifted, then. What Medieval Bodies offers is rather the life-affirming sense of a bustling and compendious canvas, almost limitlessly diverting. Those studying medieval literature – particularly its carnally-fixated ascetics, like Julian of Norwich – should treat this episodic but ingenious book as a rich backdrop to their more detailed reading, and plunder it for nuggets of context. Hartnell’s holistic gaze takes in areas, like Hebrew medical writing, which illuminate mainstream currents of European thought while never troubling any mainstream reading lists. 

One of the most arresting images in this highly visual book is from a copy of Jean Froissart’s Chroniques (c.1475), showing in gratuitous detail the gory beheading of four French traitors. The blood is very red, and the heads awfully detached – but the main interest is in the spectators’ expressions in the background, exchanging glances with a grim mixture of approval and titillation on their childish, oval faces. Hartnell’s Middle Ages are marked by various flavours of motiveless physical cruelty. However, his open and likeable sense of compassion is usually mute on these points; it emerges most when human ignorance, rather than malevolence, is concerned. His publisher, the Wellcome Collection, is associated with charitable efforts to improve world healthcare, so this is only fitting. 

The most troubling vision here, Hartnell implies, is of men and women whose bodies were just like ours, but who lacked – or were deprived of – the means to look after them properly. ‘Neither able nor willing to redesign their ideas about the body from scratch, the deep-rooted classical traditions that doctors were nobly perpetuating had an unshakable hold, even if it meant draining several pints of blood from a perfectly healthy person.’ This frequently-sounded note of regret is like a curator’s pause for thought during a gallery tour. It lends heart to a book which, though good for the eyes, would otherwise be slightly skin-deep.

Who is responsible for allergen information?

0

Food labels for handmade goods prepared in-store do not require allergen information on their packaging. The EU rules say that individual member states are responsible for deciding how information about non prepackaged food is provided to the customer, and the UK’s Food Regulations 2014 allow freshly handmade, non-pre-packaged food to not be individually labelled.

Natasha Ednan-Laperouse died in September 2018, going into cardiac arrest on a flight after consuming a Pret A Manger sandwich from Heathrow Airport. The sandwich contained sesame seeds, but the label did not identify the allergen. A month later, Theresa May said that the government must reconsider Food Packaging Regulations, and Michael Gove agrees with Natasha’s family that laws must be tightened.

The family’s lawyer Jill Paterson said: “The law as it stands currently treats multinational companies in the same way as a local sandwich shop. This cannot be right.” UK Food Regulations state that allergen information must be available and that if it is not on a label attached to the food it must be on a notice, menu, or ticket which is “readily discernible by an intending purchaser”.

Pret A Manger stated that their allergen information was present in fridges and that a notice on tills states to ask workers for any allergen information. Legally, this is enough. Some groups feel that when an allergy is life threatening the sufferer should always check with sellers because labels may not be enough. It seems that Natasha’s death proves that labels aren’t to be trusted: should there be a blanket law making all labels crystal clear?

Andy Slaughter, the Labour MP for Hammersmith where the Ednan-Laperouse family live, was disappointed by Pret A Manger’s response and stated that the “government is saying it’s down to businesses and businesses are saying it’s down to the government, while both are relying on enforcement from local government organisations that have been cut
to the bone”.

He continues to say that “We have a piecemeal regulatory framework, with no real resources to actually enforce it.” It’s a cat-and
mouse mess: things are only fixed when a company is caught out and something goes badly wrong.

So why does the law allow Pret A Manger to not put allergen information on every product? This regulation is designed to ease the pressure on small businesses. Our local independent cafes and food stores will suffer if pedantic labelling laws are imposed on them. Many cafes and companies advertise allergens on whiteboards, wall-menus, and with little hand-written labels within food display-cases, which is suitable for their scale. The cost and effort of labelling every sandwich or meal would affect the profit margins of these companies differently to larger franchises like Pret A Manger.

Given that the packaging of a company like Pret is already mass produced, and, thus, can be amended in a single swoop, it is plausible that their labelling could be regulated with necessary allergen information without too much financial hassle. With this in mind, there is no reason why stricter laws should be not be imposed on large companies.

Additionally, in any supermarket, particularly with the advent of meal deals, you can rely on finding the same products every day. As a consumer, I perceive products meals from Pret or Eat in exactly the same way as if I had just walked into a Tesco or Waitrose, precisely because you can expect the same quality of food for the same price. It is not only awkward but near impossible to make an over-the-counter enquiry as to whether a certain product contains a certain allergen. The onus must therefore go back onto the company to be absolutely transparent in order to avoid another tragedy.

So what should be done? It’s evident that things must change. Nevertheless, the incoming laws must be nuanced. On the one hand, all products need to be safe for the consumer, on the other, a barrage of labelling information runs the risk of not only putting off the customer, but negatively altering the finances of smaller businesess. But shouldn’t health and safety be placed above money?

Talkin’ ’bout a Revolution: The Sound of Protest Art

0

Tracy Chapman’s appearance at the 1988 Nelson Mandela tribute concert transformed her career. The political turmoil surrounding Apartheid was transposed onto Chapman’s performance; songs confronting domestic abuse, segregation, and poverty were broadcasted to 600 million people. This worldwide crowd answered her lyrical calls for change by propelling her to overnight stardom. The songs that that provoked this response – the now classic ‘Behind the Wall’, ‘Across the Lines’, and ‘Fast Car’ – have received international acclaim. They delight and disturb their listener in equal, uneasy measure.

Protest music has always had a disruptive agenda. Green Day’s American Idiot, Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Alright’, and James Brown’s Say It Loud – I’m Black and I’m Proud are unapologetic in their honesty. They simultaneously agitate and excite. The function of these works is to have every listener blaring the same anthem – they initiate a musical battle cry. Quieter forms of protest music can be just as loud. Woody Guthrie’s ‘This Land Is Your Land’ or Donovan’s ‘Universal Soldier’ are archetypal of protest in the folk tradition, using memorable storytelling to rally and challenge hegemony. Pieces without the explicitness of lyrics can also be filled with new political meaning; a performance of Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 was performed to celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall. Repackaging the symphony as an ‘Ode to Freedom’, instead of the original ‘Ode to Joy’, revered the political shift.

This constant cultural backdrop of music on our radios, televisions, and mobile phones, makes it an effective mechanism for change. The philosopher Theodore Adorno concluded that protest music is “taking the horrendous and making it somehow consumable”. Injustices are filtered into our everyday life through music. The politically unpalatable can be digested. Adorno argues that this can breed complacency; but the opposite seems to be true. A nation entirely captivated by the next impassioned soul, folk, or rock hit is more likely to act than one consuming and conforming to the dominant narrative.

It is fitting that Chapman’s music is a blend of all these genres. Her soulful voice is able to travel between folk, pop, and blue-rock across her eight studio albums. Despite her fluid style, the albums are linked by a consistent political engagement. She is unconcerned with sticking to a specific cause; instead, her songs present a web of various social controversies. As Chapman herself says, “I think it’s important, if you are an artist, to use your music to stand up for what you believe in.” Mountain O’ Things denounces materialism and excess; Cold Feet examines the extent to which some will go to escape destitution; while Short Supply critiques our detrimental impact upon the environment. Despite the variation in the problems, the theme – the intention – remains unchanged: to protest.

Not only do her pieces flow from one political outcry to the next, but they are also often void of politics altogether. The merit of her debut, Tracy Chapman, is that it can drift from a guttural protest song to the hush of a love song. Chapman’s voice is the only instrument required for ‘Behind the Wall’. Her distress is immediately felt with the words “Last night I heard the screaming / Loud voices behind the wall.” Then Chapman displaces this visceral depiction of domestic violence with the tranquillity of ‘Baby Can I Hold You’. The tonal shift is repeated throughout the album: a challenge towards world hunger and warfare in ‘Why?’ is swiftly followed by the intimacy of ‘For My Lover’. Her initial question of “Why are the missiles called peacekeepers / When they’re aimed to kill” in ‘Why?’ becomes more threatening when preceded with “I’d climb a mountain if I had to / And risk my life so I could have you” in ‘For My Lover’. The initial anarchy Chapman interrogates is present in the same world as the devotion and humility expressed towards her ‘lover’. Riot and affection exist side by side; the contrast between them reveals why the rebellion is necessary.

Chapman’s most famous song, ‘Fast Car’, is a perfect example of this tension. It intertwines the cyclical nature of poverty with a love affair. Billie Holiday’s haunting rendition of ‘Strange Fruit’, a song condemning lynching, is placed in the middle of songs of romance and joy in her self-titled album. Bob Dylan’s tender love song towards the ‘Girl from the North Country’ finds breathing space among the defiance of ‘Blowin’ in the Wind’ and ‘Masters of War’. Protest musicians have always flowed from outrage to intimacy, exhibiting the humanity subjected to the horror.

The final song on Tracy Chapman’s debut album is ‘For You’. To conclude the drama and anguish of what has come before, Chapman ends with simplicity: “No words to say / No words to convey / This feeling inside I have for you.” At the end of an album raging with lyrical wit and complexities, having proudly scrutinised social wrongdoing, she is finally “at a loss for words to express [her] feelings.” She is not simply a political warrior; she is also fallible and frail. This outcome displays the innate humanity of her work. It reflects what is at the core of protest art.

New almond tree on High Street will be planted “this week”

0

The tree stood outside the University Church of St Mary the Virgin on Oxford’s High Street.

It was reportedly damaged by the heatwave in summer 2018, losing one of its branches. In January of this year, it was deemed “no longer safe” and was cut down.

The removal was met with “sadness” by both tourists and students.

However, Jeremy Mogford, who owns multiple establishments in the city, including the Old Bank Hotel (which houses Quod), and Gee’s in north Oxford, has pledged to replace it.

He stated: “I was very sad to see it go – its amazing to see how many people said the almond tree heralded spring. We are part of the vista of The High and the tree is an important part of that vista – it’s very important for the people of Oxford and for tourists who visit the city.”

The vicar of the church, Rev Dr William Lamb, has said that the new almond tree is expected to be planted on Thursday at 10:30am. The planting will be “coordinated by” staff from the university parks department.

He stated: “We tried to save the old tree but it was dangerous – we had no choice but to cut it down.

It’s a generous offer from Mr Mogford, which we have accepted – each new tree will cost hundreds of pounds.

Experts from the university parks department, which looks after our churchyard, are now selecting suitable trees which will be between two to three metres in height.”

Colleges warn students of scabies outbreak

0

Exeter and Magdalen have sent emails warning its students about “an outbreak of scabies between students at various colleges in Oxford”.

In their email, Exeter warn warns students that “Scabies is very contagious. It is spread from one infected person to another through direct, prolonged, close physical contact. Student communities are at high risk of spreading scabies because of this.”

The college urges students to “remind other students or friends outside of college that there is an outbreak of scabies in the colleges in case they have concerns about changes in their skin appearance which are irritating them.

“Scabies can be caught by anyone so please don’t ignore the condition or worry about seeing your GP, talking to pharmacist, your family or friends etc.

“Ensure you go back to your GP if the condition gets worse or if you have not recovered after 6 weeks.”

It is not known which college the outbreak originated at, or how many colleges and students have been affected.

The warning follows wider concern over student health, with NHS England having confirmed over 220 suspected cases and 40 confirmed of Mumps amongst students at Nottingham University.

Exeter and Magdalen have been contacted for comment.

If you are worried that you might have contracted scabies contact your GP for advice.

Gender pay gap: Vice-Chancellor criticises “frustratingly slow” progress

0

Little progress has been made in reducing the earnings gap between male and female staff members, a report by the University has revealed.

Since the first such report last year, the mean gender pay gap amongst Oxford University staff has decreased slightly from 24.5% to 22.6% but remains higher than the national average. The median figure has remained at 13.7%.

Although more women are in receipt of bonus payments, the mean gap between male and female bonus pay is 64.1% (down from 79% last year). The median figure has decreased substantially, however, from 48.7% to 6.7%, suggesting that the bonuses of senior male staff are responsible for much of the gap.

The report finds that: “The gender pay gaps identified are mainly attributable to a lack of women in senior roles in the University.” Of the 25% highest-earning staff, just 38% are women. A majority of all other staff are women, including 62.5% of the 25% lowest-paid staff.

In introduction to the report, Vice-Chancellor Louise Richardson, writes: “[W]e have made progress, but the progress is frustratingly slow.”

The report reiterates a commitment by the University to achieve yearly increases in the proportion of female professors at the university, with a short-term goal of 30% by 2020 for all professors and 20% for statutory professors. This is coupled with a commitment to see a third of University leadership roles, such as departmental heads and senior management positions, occupied by women.

As an organisation with over 250 employees, the University is legally required to release gender pay data. Last year, a number of colleges released their own statistics, with Balliol and Keble reporting the highest mean pay gaps this time last year.

The 2019 report is available on the University website.

Mackintosh at the Liverpool Walker

0

Being met by a single, rather old, wooden chair is a bold opening statement for any exhibition, though the Liverpool Walker’s current exhibition of the Scottish architect, painter and designer, Charles Rennie Mackintosh, carries this off with aplomb. In many ways, this single piece of everyday furniture captures the essence of Mackintosh, or at least what the curators wish to present him as, a working-class liberator of the arts. This presentation is indeed a convincing one, acting as a showcase of his strikingly aesthetic images, ones that were not meant to be kept in private homes or collections, but instead to adorn the streets, tea rooms, and advertising boards of Glasgow, to be appreciated by all.
Likewise, Mackintosh’s numerous architectural plans seem something more than preparatory sketches, mere functionalist slaves to the construction of the building represented. Instead, the plans for Glasgow’s New School of Art, with their striking red borders, and washed interiors of blues and greens, directed by bold black lines are inherently attractive. Even the elevations of the stairwells are precisely inked, down to individual bannisters and supports showing a draughtsman with an eye for a quotidian beauty that needn’t be confined to traditional spheres of art, but one that could permeate technical plans.
This intersection between the practical and the aesthetic sums up much of Mackintosh’s work, whilst seemingly echoing aspects of the Mucha exhibition held at the Walker in 2017 and the gallery’s permanent collection of Pre-Raphaelite work. Like Mucha and the Pre-Raphaelites, Mackintosh’s figures blur the distinctions between nature and humanity, many containing an ethereal, subaqueous, even disturbing quality. This is apparent in Mackintosh’s 1898 painting of an auburn-haired woman who is as much a part of nature as the landscape- strewn with roses -from which she emerges.
Likewise his advertisement, two years earlier for the Scottish Musical Review, though not highly ornamented nevertheless demonstrates this breakdown of boundaries, whilst amplifying the sexuality that in the other work is a mere undertone. A pair of swifts are foregrounded against two crimson spheres, which when considered in light of the central figure’s voluptuous crimson lips emerge as stylised breasts. The birds’ elongated tails reaffirm the sexuality of the image, creating a border for the lower part of the image before forming the vulvic shroud of the woman’s head. This morphing takes place in the pair of Scottish thistles which flank the upper portion of the image, where they seemingly sprout the keys of a brass instrument, which remind the audience what the poster is advertising. All this is synthesised precisely and simply, using the same colour scheme as his architectural plans, the classic Mackintosh crimson, mid-green, and black.
Some of the most moving pieces in the exhibition were not the vast posters, stained-glass windows, or tapestries. Instead, the pocket sketchbooks of Mackintosh and his contemporaries, such as Talwin Morris, show scores of pencil and watercolour manifestations of internal ideas, most of them remaining in this inchoate form, never realised. These range from a lilac budding in five vulnerable stages to three separate patterns for wallpaper or carpet, verdant and vine-like. Though these were designed to be scaled up, the power of these works lies in their intimacy, coupled with the Romantic poignancy in the knowledge that they never progressed past this initial stage. Their spatial proximity on the page contrasts with their undoubted relational separation to create a distinct intimacy with the artist and his works in a way that is rare to find in larger or completed pieces.
Much of the success of the exhibition lies in the variety of the scale of the works on display, for instance the comfortable cohabitation between small, standalone drawings with larger glorious poster cycles. Similarly, though the work is predominantly by Mackintosh, included is a significant amount of work by British contemporaries but also, more thought provokingly, coeval works from places as disparate as Anatolia, Japan, and Turkey. A Japanese book of crests and watercolours from 1881, strikingly like Mackintosh as they may be, displays a marked abstraction, something Mackintosh only really experimented with at the end of his life in the 1920s when his city and landscapes contain a subtle surrealism. Eastern ceramics and woodblocks invite further stylistic comparisons through geographic range.
It is an ironic but fitting valediction to Mackintosh that his fundamentally ‘everyday’ Art- whether in subject matter or in design -now finds itself transported from the bustling streets and private notebooks of its origin to galleries across the country, where it is completely at home.