Friday 22nd August 2025
Blog Page 638

Cellar closure blamed on landlords “pursuing maximum profit”

0

The Music Venue Trust describes itself as acting “to protect, secure, and improve grassroots music venues”.

The charitable organisations St Michael’s and All Saints’ Charities are the landlords. The aims of these charities include the support the church of St. Michael and the North Gate nearby.

The news comes after a long battle for Cellar’s survival. In 2017, the church charities attempted to shut the club down in order to redevelop the venue into storage for a shop. A petition signed by over 13,600 supporters kept it open; however, another blow was dealt a year later as The Cellar had to limit the number of people allowed in to just 60 after inspectors decided that the fire escape was 30cm too narrow.

Over 2,000 supporters pledged more than £92,000 to pay for the changes. Despite this, the manager, Tim Hopkins, after failing to negotiate a rent agreement, had to close the club.

CEO of the Music Venue Trust Mark Davyd said in a statement to the press: “The final outcome of two years of campaigning by local people is that the existing venue, run by a much-admired family, powered by a passion and commitment to the local scene, has been lost.

The landlords state that they want to be ‘champions of live music in the city’, but put simply they have lost a tenant who was keenly committed to that cause. If the rent was not affordable by Tim and his family, who have given years of their lives and thousands of pounds of their own money to support Oxford’s music scene, it is not going to be affordable to any other operator who is prepared to take the venue on.

We wait to see if any operator can be found to deliver a venue that genuinely supports grassroots music and artists in this location, and, of course, we will support anyone who is able to do that.

But two years ago, the landlord was happy to close this venue to try to maximise its profit, and now the venue is closed and the pursuit of maximum profit is still the intent of the landlord.

Until landlords are made to appreciate that they are part of an entire community and that not every square inch of land can be maximised for profit without destroying the heart and soul of our cities, we are going to go on seeing venues across the land closed down.

In this particular case, the landlord is a charity. If even charities are so driven by a profit motive that they are unable to appreciate their duties and obligations to local communities, then we are in a very sad and sorry place.”

Speaking to Cherwell, Strategic Director of the Music Venue Trust Beverley Whitrick emphasised that the landlords themselves used the term “maximising revenue” in discussions.

In response to the allegations made by the Trust, a spokesman for St Michael’s and All Saints’ Charities said: “We are greatly saddened by The Cellar’s closure. At the forefront of the minds of the Charities is the music scene in Oxford.

To this end, we have made considerable changes to our plans for the building, at a cost to us and our beneficiaries, to enable the premises to continue to be used as a music venue.”

Cellar manager Tim Hopkins said: “We are really pleased that Oxford’s music scene is now at the forefront of the landlords’ minds. All that public support to get their initial planning application rejected was not in vain.

We have succeeded in saving the venue from being turned into a store room, and the fact that they want it to remain a live music venue is music to our ears.”

Oxford honours victims of Christchurch terrorist attack

0

A vigil for the fifty Muslims killed in Christchurch, New Zealand brought together over 200 people in Oxford on Friday afternoon.

The service was held to honour those killed when a white supremacist attacked two mosques in the city of Christchurch.

New Zealand’s flag was flown at half-mast as students, staff, academics and local residents gathered in Christ Church college’s Peckwater Quad to sing the country’s national anthem.

The historic college, after which Christchurch was named, was chosen in order to symbolise the historic links between Oxford and New Zealand.

Prayers were read out for the victims, their families and for Muslim communities worldwide.

Dr. Sheikh Ramzy of the Oxford Islamic Information Centre said that the attack had “backfired” by uniting New Zealanders of all faiths and called for Muslims and non-Muslims to ensure that future attacks continue to backfire.

Attendees were asked to bring individual flowers, which were laid one-by-one below the flagpole. After a few days the flowers will be cast into the Thames, as per New Zealand tradition.

A statement by the organisers read: “Christchurch is a city that has already suffered so much, but the people have proved time and again that strength and resilience come through unity.

“In the wake of these horrific attacks on the mosques in Christchurch, it is more important now than ever, to stand together in unity and show that actions born of hate, intolerance and bigotry will fail to incite violence.”

St John’s creates post to research its colonial past

0

St John’s College has announced the creation of a new research post exploring “St John’s and the Colonial Past”, the first position of its kind to be established at the university.

The two year role as a research assistant will focus on “explor[ing] connections between the college and colonialism, uncovering benefactions to St John’s and the alumni who served in the empire.”

The move follows investigations by American universities into their involvement with the slave trade. In the UK, the University of Glasgow recently published a report on its own ties to slavery, whilst Edinburgh University has undertaken a similar project.

The vacancy posting cites a “drive to ‘decolonise the university’- or, at any rate, to think about the implications of institutional involvement in imperial projects of the past” as the chief motive behind this new research.

It goes on to say that “there are thus compelling intellectual and ethical reasons for institutions of higher education to face up to the role they played in the British Empire.”

The college identifies the goals of the research as the production of “a report and other scholarly publications”, as well as to “set the standard for future work in other institutions.”

After research has been completed, a series of workshops will be held in order to broaden discussion of the topic and to formulate responses to the project’s findings.

The application directly refers to the Rhodes Must Fall campaign as an example of how “institutional involvement in the imperial projects of the past — is now a matter of world-wide scholarly concern.”  

Rhodes Must Fall originated in South Africa and called for the removal of statues of Cecil Rhodes from the Oxford Campus; it was inevitably unsuccessful.

Further information provided by St John’s College describes Oxford’s involvement as various, stating: “Oxford in general helped to educate and train colonial administrators; missionaries; apologists for, and critics, of empire; and significant leaders and creators of newly independent states.”

The post is currently open for applications and the appointee will begin their work alongside Professor William Whyte, leader of the project and Professor of Social and Architectural History, at the start of next year.

A letter to: My closeted self

0

To myself, but hollow,

It was a wild ride getting to the place we’re at right now. You spent the first seventeen years of your life drowning so far in denial that even you were surprised when you crushed on a guy for the first time. You were merely a simple ‘straight’ boy, sat sipping lattes with a friend in Starbucks, when the realisation washed over like a wave and suddenly your world came crumbling down around you. You didn’t know you were lost until I found you. 

Life before then was strange. Maybe only in hindsight, it seems like the years leading up until seventeen were muted, with the saturation turned down, while you joked and wrote and dated and functioned on the day-to-day, skirting all the while around an unavoidable truth. If you could stand where I stand now, you would see that everything is not fine, and you’ve convinced yourself that a pond is an ocean. Your denial has created walls you can’t even see. You do theatre and write poems and like reading, but when bullies call you gay and use slurs you don’t understand, you are sure it’s just because you are different and, because of some odd stereotypes, they are just adding 2 and 2 and getting 5 because they don’t know any better. You can’t consider, even for a second, that they might know you better than you do. I think that’s what crushed you the most once you realised that you looked at guys the same way you looked at girls; it meant that every person who had ever assumed your queerness had been right. And, more importantly, you had been wrong. I’ll never be able to reconcile the pain you went through for those first few months, and loneliness, and the fears, and the questions running around in your head; how will I have kids? Who will I marry? What actually is gay sex, since I was never taught it in school? If I kiss a guy in public, will I get hurt? And then, in a deeper voice, echoing above the rest – how do I tell people, and what will they think?

I’m sorry about the friends you’re going to lose. For the friends that won’t understand; who find it weird; who make it weird; who will see you as predatory; who will become predatory; I’m sorry about the people who will make a hard time worse. There’s nothing more isolating that introducing the people you care about to the ‘new’ you, and having them reject you off-hand like they never even cared to begin with. It might throw everything you think you can rely on into question for a while. But I don’t want you to worry about everyone. Your family will welcome you with open arms and nothing will change at home. You’re going to grow, and meet people who love you as you are, and who don’t flinch or wince when you come out to them. The friends that stick by you will stay stuck like glue, and they’re going to prove to you that you’re not a different person; you’re just whole now. And you were never better before you knew the truth – you were missing some really important parts, and those parts are going to end up making you into a person you can’t even imagine yet. And realising you’re different to the person you thought you were shouldn’t be scary; it should be exciting. You’ve got so much to learn about yourself, and you’re going to get to know all of it, and you’re going to love every single part, and it will be worth all the crying and moping you’re doing right now. Nothing worth having comes easy; especially not freedom.

Coming out isn’t a walk in the park for anyone. Your experience was relatively positive, despite all the turmoil you went through, because you’re still going to end up surrounded by people who love you and care about you, queerness and all. You’re following in the footsteps of thousands of people who have screamed, and cried, and fought, and died for the right to love and live proudly, and that’s what you’ve got to do. You’re blessed to live in the middle of a revolution where being proud of your sexuality is easier than it’s ever been. And that’s not to say it’s easy, because it’s not; we’ve come so far, but we’ve still got so far to go. The journey you’re about to embark on is going to be beautiful and formative, even in spite of the bumps in the road, and I can’t wait for you to see the world around you in colour for the first time.

You can do this,

I love you,

Aaron x


Some New Angles on Perspective

0

Combining foetuses, the Colosseum, polyhedrons, and NASA’s first geological map of Mars, the Bodleian’s new exhibition is determinedly not just a showcase for Leonardo da Vinci. Coinciding with the anniversary of his death in 1519, Thinking 3D displays some of the Renaissance polymath’s anatomical and architectural sketches; until September these are loans from the Royal Collection, which thereafter will be joined by others from the British Library. On one busy folio we can trace the determined prodigy’s efforts at representing a winding flight of stairs, attempting to pencil its turns and angles into scrupulous proportion; at the top right of the page hang studies of human veins and muscle. 

What unites these two different thoughts, and provides the exhibition with its springboard, is Leonardo’s effort at rendering perspective with mathematical accuracy. The surrounding collections take this focus and hugely enlarge it, ranging across much of Europe, and some five hundred years of history, to provide a whistle-stop tour of three-dimensional representation and its evolution. Leonardo intended to publish a great number of his drawings, but for hundreds of years most of it would go unseen – and in honour of these first intentions, the show’s directors have narrowed their overview to an underpromoted area: the illustrations to printed books. The results are fascinating and unusual.The directors are Daryl Green and Dr Laura Moretti, whose respective day jobs are as Librarian of Magdalen College and Senior Lecturer in Art History at St Andrews. The idea behind Thinking 3D came, they say, on a long train journey to Scotland in early 2016, when Moretti was curating an exhibition on another Renaissance polymath with writings on perspective, Daniele Barbaro. Green and Moretti particularly stress the importance of three-dimensional representations in transmitting new information – helping not only to reflect attitudes to the visual world, but alter and inform them. The printed book, which could be mass-produced and widely distributed or copied, is thus the ideal medium. More even than Leonardo’s drawings, the prints they have gathered together for the first time in one place have directly influenced the way we understand and visualise spaces and solids, right up to the present day. They make no lame claim to contemporary relevance; their material’s title to importance and interest is enduring.

The usefulness of three-dimensionality to human understanding is embedded in the exhibition from the word go. Visitors are encouraged to collect an object (polyhedron, miniature winding stairs, human brain – all relevant to an exhibit) from a shelf by the door and carry it around with them to aid comprehension of what they are seeing on the pages. The Leonardo sketches face the room from the right wall; the books are ranged in cabinets on the left and far walls; and four colour-coded display islands (one each for anatomy, geometry, architecture and astronomy) line the middle. The display is broadly chronological, as well as thematic. The Treasury Room is a small space, but if this exhibition’s great breadth necessitates a lack of depth, it will be amply enhanced by the six satellite exhibitions around Oxford which complete Green and Moretti’s project (details on the website). 

Every major method of image reproduction, from woodcut to photograph, is represented. Firsts crowd the space, and there is something here for a huge array interests. In Regiomontanus’ Nova theorica planetarum, published in 1473, we have the first book ever printed in colour, its woodcuts of planetary orbits enlivened slightly incongruously by green. Those with an interest in the history of mathematics or finance will encounter, in Luca Pacioli’s Summa de arithmetica (1494), a double whammy: the first discussion of algebra in a European vernacular, and the earliest publication on the double-entry book-keeping system. Its primary role here, however, is to illustrate the huge advance in representing three dimensions which took place when Leonardo got involved. The crude, shonky geometric woodcuts of the 1494 work are displayed alongside the extreme sophistication of da Vinci’s in Divina proportione (published 1509), also by Pacioli. These were Leonardo’s only book illustrations in his lifetime – and include the first printed rendering of an icosidodecahedron, no less.

Nearby, there is another first: Albrecht Dürer’s work on three-dimensional shapes (1525; here in its 1532 edition), which illustrates for the first time the methods for folding a flat surface into polygons. Later we come upon d’Agoty’s Anatomical Exposition of the Sense Organs (1775), one of the first books to use the mezzotint technique for colour printing – laid open at a large, almost Play-Doh pile of rounded organs, disconcerting in their skewed realism. Some photographs by Max Brückner take the exhibition to 1900 and another esoteric first; Brückner’s ghostly black-and-white shelves of paper polyhedrons are the earliest photos of complex three-dimensional shapes. 

Students interested in the multifarious history of the male gaze in the arts should also seize this opportunity. Particularly striking are works like George Spratt’s Obstetric table of 1838, with its side-on view of a comely young woman exposing her naked torso. The reader interested (perhaps) in the process of childbearing could fold down a succession of coloured prints, like in a children’s picture book, and see each stage of pregnancy play out on the exhibitionist’s body, from svelte to distended. The development of depth in art could border on the invasive, even unethical. Probably the show’s highest point is the extremely graphic engraving of a woman’s torso opened at the belly, to view the fully-formed foetus inside. The baby is beautifully rendered in sensitive depth; the woman’s legs have been cut off at the thigh, exposing the bone. Such a combination of remarkable violence and striking beauty signposts an exhibition which strays deeper than mere visual perspective. There is much more in this excellent show to think about than just 3D.

A tapestry of living and dead: Max Porter on his new book, ‘Lanny’

0

On Thursday 14thMarch, Blackwell’s hosted a talk in honour of Max Porter’s latest release Lanny. Porter was in conversation with novelist Ali Shaw, discussing his novel, his development as a writer since his last work, and how Lanny reflects the changing nature of this country and our relationship to the natural world.

Lanny is a novel, but unlike any you have read by anyone else – Porter always bleeds poetry and prose together in the most beautiful, natural way. Lanny exists as a testament to his refusal to conform to the traditional boundaries of a singular medium. The novel is like a lullaby, lament and landscape portrait all at once. Porter splits the narrative perspective into three voices (anyone who has read his first work, Grief is the Thing With Feathers, will recognise this style of writing), each centring around the remarkable young boy called Lanny, describing him, speaking to him, watching him. In this, Porter creates an entire novel around an absence – never hearing Lanny’s voice directly, he is told through multiple voices, and the reader comes to realise that every character is a reflective surface for a central, yet hauntingly absent, presence. I have only seen this done so beautifully in Virginia Woolf’s 1922 novel Jacob’s Room, where the central character is told through the voices, letters and recollections of those who know him. Porter creates a character that is both real and intangible, touchable but painfully just out of reach, human and a form from the natural world. Porter, like Woolf, bends the traditional notion of the ‘protagonist’, refusing to focus solely on the being of one person, denying us complete intimacy with a single presence and instead widening the novel to every type of person, every voice available to him as a writer. 

Grief is the Thing With Feathers (2016) naturally comes into the conversation. I read the collection shortly after it was published, and it remains one of the only works that has ever explained and understood bereavement for me. I always call it a poetry collection, but the beauty of Porter’s work is that it is constantly a hybrid, speaking to you personally – at once poetry,novella,elegy; a startling, modern In Memoriam. Charting the process through which a father and his two sons deal with the loss of their mother, the human narrative voices are joined by that of Crow, a myth, a real voice, a descendant of Hughes’ creation in Life and Songs of the Crow, and an entirely modern presence. Porter’s love for myth and ancestry continues from Grief is the Thing; into Lanny enters the presence of Dead Papa Toothwort, a decaying, shape-shifting, voyeuristic presence from the hidden natural world surrounding the village. When Ali asks about the similarities between Crow and Toothwort, Porter answers that they are different characters but taken from the same realm. Shape-shifting, natural creatures, both ravenous for a new kind of language outside the human order.

Lanny takes place in a quiet English village, commuting distance from London, with a collective memory stretching back to the Domesday Book. It is a tapestry of present voices, and their ghosts, new arrivals, and families that have existed there throughout time. Porter spoke of how he wanted the characters in the village to reflect how we speak of each other in this country, the subtle xenophobic comments alongside the desire for progression, forcing us to remember there is no such thing (at any point in our country’s history) as a purely ‘English person’. Next to these wider, socio-political concerns sits Lanny, suspended between the different worlds of the imaginative, natural and mythological, clearly ‘different’ from other children and people in the village. The novel considers how we see and understand different people, and more broadly the idea of difference itself – difference is figured as a contribution towards the richness of life. 

The female voices Porter creates are a beautiful aspect of Lanny. Lanny’s mum Jolie, actress turned writer, stands for the darker side of maternal life. In this character, Porter shows his absolute proficiency at writing human experience. He writes on the crisis of masculinity Lanny’s father undergoes and Jolie’s struggles of motherhood , illustrating his ability to access the roots of human experience, regardless of gender. 

Lanny is a hauntingly beautiful, strange and empathetic novel, showing Porter’s brilliance yet again. Porter weaves his prose from present voices and memories, from landscape and human emotion. The pages are made both living and dead.

The Dark Review – ‘calls our attention to the othering of refugees’

0

A semi-autobiographical piece of writing, Nick Makoha’s The Dark centres on one night in November 1978 and follows the journey of a four-year-old and his mother as they escape a war-torn Uganda under the vicious rule of Idi Amin.

Most of the action takes place on a matutu – ‘bus’, which enables us to meet a wide range of characters. With only two actors, The Dark immediately centres on what the writer refers to as the ‘binary of human connection’, making us look beyond the mother-son relationship. Although a two-actor play may seem ambitious, under director Roy Alexander Weise’s (The Mountaintop, Nine Night) careful guidance, Michael Balogun and Akiya Henry smoothly shift from character to character. This careful morphing is managed through subtle mannerisms with Henry in particular, skilfully shifting from a pregnant biscuit-seller to the disgruntled brother of the matutu driver. Their rapid switching is very impressive especially in moments when Balogun regresses from playing a grown man to the wide-eyed young boy submerged in a world of conflict. At times it was dizzying to keep track of character development with some of the less sketched characters, but perhaps the excessive use of multi-roling was to ensure that the story of the community was centred at the dramatic heart of this play, enabling the audience to see how Idi Aman’s rule affected a whole country.

Makoha’s poem Stone, which centres on the writer’s exodus from Uganda, triggered the conception of this play, and one can see how The Dark infuses poetry and theatre together through the use of melodic language. The poetic fluidity of the language was further enhanced by the use of a projector, which flickered intimate portraits on the stage. Like Stone, The Dark is also love-letter to Makoha’s mother, championing and celebrating black womanhood. This is reflected in the strong presence of women in the play, which for me effectively mirrored the importance African women have within their own families and the wider community. The set allows for a raw performance with Rajha Shakiry’s design effectively conjuring the cramped space of the matatu with bus seats and a cluttered writing desk. The simplicity of the set design is nicely complemented by soft and hazy lightning from Neill Brinkworth, with contrasting focused backlights adding a dull, ruddy ambience.

With over 16.5 million displaced people in the world (figures from Oxfordshire-based charity Asylum Welcome), the play’s true success is its individualised telling of a refugee story. This is particularly powerful given the current climate in the Britain at present with the Windrush crisis, and the atmosphere surrounding Brexit. From its opening, Makoha urges us to open our hearts to this story by asking the audience to close their eyes and surrender themselves to the story. We are welcomed into the play as the narrator expresses his gratitude for our journey to this destination, but at the end this warm welcome reversed, and it is their journey out of Uganda that alienates them once they land at Heathrow. When the immigration officer tells the young boy to “go and join the others”, Makoha succinctly calls our attention to the othering and politicisation of refugees, who are either ignored or voyeuristically watched (like the white observer in the play who is constantly recording on his dictaphone).

The ending of the play was rather abrupt, but that could be a conscious decision from the playwright to ‘welcome’ the boy and his mother to the harsh reality of being refugees in the UK. The strength of the lightning can be seen in these closing moments, as the young boy arrives at British immigration from the familiar semi-darkness to be scrutinised beneath the harsh, unwelcoming glare of halogens.

Counselling should do more

0

My main emotional outlet at fifteen – in lieu of talking to my friends, family, or, er, anyone – was rock climbing. The routes at my local centre were set once a month, and I could hurl myself at a blunt rock face every Saturday for an hour without raising any eyebrows.

The hardest route took me weeks to complete, and left me with a sprained wrist. If I’d had more time, or resources, or energy, I probably could have completed the challenge without injuring myself in the process. It’s taken me years to recognise and apply these lessons when taking care of my mental health.

With this in mind, I had no intentions of using the university counselling service when I came to Oxford. My anxiety at this point had become a minor and manageable thing, which in any case felt too broad to be tackled over a fixed number of sessions.

However, halfway through Michaelmas I had a traumatic experience, and over the vacation I decided it might be worth exploring the university’s support services. Unlike my anxiety, this wasn’t a problem spanning years, but an obstacle, with a distinct aftermath, which I felt reasonably confident that I could overcome, and so I set about making an appointment. This process is where the counselling service excels: fire off an email, fill out a form, accept an appointment, fill out another form. The steps are manageable, and applying in the vacation gave me the advantage of a minimal wait time which leaves many waiting until the end of term, forcing others into private therapy.

The service itself is a more complex creature, and the phrase “lack of resources” is less than groundbreaking for anyone acquainted with mental health services, not only in Oxford but across the country. By my second session we were discussing my options for private therapy, in order to secure more long term support; I was discouraged from pursuing my options with the university EMDR service because of the lengthy waiting times.

It was also becoming readily apparent that I was not experiencing a simple, four session problem. I suspect very few people do.

I approached the system feeling like I had a hit roadblock, and was ready to emotionally invest in the service’s four sessions in order to overcome it.

In reality, it was more like being sat in front of a mountain, and trying to tunnel through it with a teaspoon.

With the sessions so carefully numbered, there is a pressure not to use them too quickly. There are no allowances for good behaviour, or a sliding scale for bigger problems.

If any part of me naively hope they might stretch to an extra appointment or two for something serious, it was rapidly disabused. This in itself is disheartening -the rigidity of the appointment structure can feel like it’s minimising the problems students are bringing so that we feel like we’re overreacting instead of like we’re not being accommodated.

To counter this, we spread my sessions over fortnight periods, unravelling my trauma in carefully controlled explosions before trying to pile the toothpaste back into the tube.

At no point did anyone ask if trying to overcome sexual assault in under four hours seemed challenging. Quite quickly the object of the sessions shifted from overcoming the assault to merely addressing it, and this adjustment brought its own tensions with it. Repeatedly bringing upsetting memories to the forefront of my mind had consistent repercussions outside of my allotted counselling time, and we frequently needed the full 50 minutes just to explore the problem fully, let alone consider possible coping mechanism or how I was going to get better.

Frankly, the system is brutal. A stop- watch is hovered above the recovery process, and it’s terrifying. There’s simply no recognition of the role that time plays in aiding recovery from mental health issues; the appointments are drawn out over weeks at a time with each session offering a sharp fifty minutes to explode and subsequently repackage whatever needs to be addressed.

When my third appointment ended in floods of tears (my own, not the counsellor’s), I was kindly offered to take some time for myself in whichever of the building’s toilets.

Alternatively, my counsellor gently suggested I could sit in the waiting room until I felt ready to head back to college.

The system has some clear and serious fault lines. The lengthy waiting times prevent many from even requesting an appointment, the number of sessions drastically limit their utility, and ultimately often serve to scratch the surface of existing conflicts without providing the time and resources needed to resolve them. These aren’t issues unique to Oxford, and these concerns are comprehensively echoed across university and NHS systems alike. Colleges can pick up some of the slack, and Jesus and Keble have hired onsite counselors for their students.

Despite my frustrations, both structural and personal, I will continue to champion therapy; to suggest it to friends who are struggling, and pursue it for my own needs. I would rather hack away at the mountain with a teaspoon than sit in front of it doing nothing at all. However, it seems like there should be a way to do it sustainably, and without risking further harm in the process. Asking the university to meaningfully invest in an obviously struggling system should not seem like an unreasonable request, but after 2 months of propping myself up against a struggling counselling service, any request is made to feel overwhelming.

So Far Gone – Ten years on

0

A decade ago, Aubrey Graham was trying to break into the music industry. After 8 years playing Jimmy Brooks on a Canadian soap opera Degrassi, he finally succeeded in February 2009. Using his middle name Drake as his stage-name, he released an 18-track mix tape called So Far Gone. It was his third mix-tape, and it shot him to superstardom, causing a seismic change in the hip-hop landscape. Sounding more like a professional studio album than a collection of freestyles, it fundamentally altered the idea of what a mix tape could achieve. His songs blurred the lines between hip-hop and RnB, which have remained fuzzy ever since.

So Far Gone’s most lasting legacy, however, is that it introduced a level of vulnerability that had previously absent in the genre. Drake worried about alienation and unrequited love over wintery synths and moody beats. Say What’s Real began with the lines “Why do I feel so alone?/ Like everybody passing through the studio/ is in character as if he acting out a movie role.” These were honest and introspective lyrics; Drake was unafraid to look soft. Lil Wayne later said the reason he produced the unknown artist’s mix tape was because his music “was so honest … we as listeners we weren’t used to that yet.”

Drake recently marked the ten-year anniversary of So Far Gone by releasing it on all streaming platforms for the first time. This anniversary provides us with an opportunity to reflect on how hip-hop has changed during the last decade. Following Drake’s success, rappers are now embracing their vulnerability, shedding the aura of toxic braggadocio that defined the genre’s rise to prominence in the 1990s through the vehicle of “gangsta rap”.

During this period, the typical rapper embodied the battle-hardened survivor of gang warfare. He threatened violence if slighted and admitted no weakness. Where hip-hop artists in the 1990s did confront issues of mental health and vulnerability, they rapped about them with an unwavering indifference. Biggie Small’s voice in Suicidal Thoughts gives no hint of fear and he raps about wanting to go to hell rather than heaven because “I wanna tote guns and shoot dice” rather than “hanging with the goodie-goodies dressed in white.” Hip-hop artists needed to hide their insecurities. As Biggie Smalls’ mother said in a New York Times article in 1994, “he doesn’t want anyone to see that he’s not as tough as he thinks he is … he cried inside… but he doesn’t want anyone to see the vulnerable side to him.”

Drake didn’t just expose these vulnerabilities on So Far Gone, he built his hip-hop persona based on his sensitivity and introspection. In the decade since, Drake has emerged as world’s biggest music superstar, receiving 42 Grammy nominations and shattering just about every streaming and Billboard record in the process.

This success has inspired the other titans of hip-hop to embrace their emotional side. Jay-Z’s 2017 album 4:44 begins “Cry Jay-Z/ We know the pain is real/But you can’t heal what you never reveal.” He revealed that he goes to therapy, and in the press before its release he said the creative process involved the “killing of the ego, so we can have this conversation in a place of vulnerability and honesty.” Lil Wayne finally opened up in 2016 about a time he attempted suicide. Kendrick Lamar dedicated a whole song on DAMN. to revealing his deepest fears. J. Cole rapped on Lost Ones from his Cole World project, “I ain’t too proud to tell you that I cry sometimes.” The industry’s biggest rappers have begun to engage in a refreshing dialogue about toxic masculinity: the message to other men is that it is okay to have fears and to be vulnerable.

The last few years have seen this frank discussion on vulnerability in hip-hop extended to issues of mental health, which were rarely addressed in hip-hop before. Kid Cudi is usually cited as instigating this change by revealing that he suffered with depression in a Facebook post on 5th October 2016, when he admitted himself into rehab. He wrote “my anxiety and depression have ruled my life for as long as I can remember and I never leave the house because of it.”  

Following his lead, Kendrick Lamar discussed his experiences with depression on the song u from the album To Pimp A Butterfly. Kanye West revealed that he too suffered from mental health issues with his most recent album, ye. The message “I hate being bi-polar, its awesome” was scrawled onto the album’s artwork. In 2017, Logic wrote a song called1-800-273-8255 – the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline in America – directly addressing the issue of suicide and the help one can receive if they feel suicidal.

Meanwhile a new generation of hip-hop artists have emerged who put mental health issues and vulnerability as their central subject. “SoundCloud rappers” like Lil Peep, Lil Uzi Vert and XXXtacion, so called because of their reliance on the platform to gain popularity, have created extraordinarily personal music about their depression and suicidal urges.

Artists have a profound influence shaping society through the messages they share in their music. They are role models to millions of impressionable young fans. This is why it is so important that the last ten years have seen rappers drop their swaggering and invulnerable facades. A new generation of hip-hop fans will grow up hearing it is okay to feel sad sometimes. People suffering mental health issues will realise that they are not alone. Both artist Travis Scott and comedian Pete Davidson have publicly said that Kid Cudi saved their lives by creating music that spoke frankly about mental health issues, as it led them to seek help. After Logic performed 1-800-273-8255 at the VMA’s, calls to the US Suicide Prevention Hotline increased by 50%.

Hip hop has finally embraced vulnerability. We must be thankful to Drake that the toxic braggadocio that plagued the genre ten years ago is So Far Gone.

Bird Box: a victim of its own platform?

0

Bird Box is an exciting watch. In an apocalyptic world where an invisible force causes people to commit suicide by bombarding them with visions of the most dismal things they can imagine, preying upon their saddest memories, the only way to survive is to remain blindfolded.

We see Malorie (Sandra Bullock) and how she survives in the first few months after the epidemic of mass suicides—as well as five years down the line, where she must embark on a perilous journey down a river with two young children, whom she calls merely “Girl” and “Boy”. The viewing is filled with tension, jump-scares and moments of shock-horror.

We are motivated to keep watching by the questions set up by the plot: What has happened in the intervening five years? Why is it that people who are already mentally ill are affected differently? What is the significance of the birds Malorie carries with her in a box?

Questions also arise about what sort of message the film is trying to convey. Some scenes hint at a commentary on the state of our civilisation: one character says the suicides are caused by demons who have come to eradicate the species, claiming that “humans have been judged and been found wanting”. Some reviewers have suggested that the film is asking questions about the meaning of living: is it worth being alive if you’re only surviving? This may be the reason for Malorie not giving the children names: it could make them too emotionally attached to each other, lulling them into a false sense of domestic safety. However, these points of introspection are too lightly touched upon to make any meaningful impact on the viewer.

The film feels somehow unfinished. The interesting concept is not explored to its full potential; it feels more like an extended episode of a TV show rather than a movie. I wonder whether this is the fate of Netflix films: made for streaming, they are not held to the same standards as films released in cinemas.

Watching something on Netflix, we keep one eye on the screen and one eye on our phones; we talk over it to our friends; we pause it to get a drink, or to go to sleep. Watching a film on a computer screen rather than in a cinema immediately robs it of a certain atmospheric quality.

Nevertheless, the fact that Bird Box was made for Netflix has allowed it to reach a very wide audience in a short time. The immediacy of Netflix, the fact that millions of people around the world can stream at the same time, means that Netflix originals can very rapidly make an impact on popular culture. It helps that Bird Box has scenes that are extremely exploitable as memes or reaction images (many memes appeared on Twitter within the first few days of its release that there was speculation that Netflix was making the memes themselves and spreading them via fake accounts).

Whether it’s worthy of the attention or not, once a Netflix original has made this impression on popular culture, more and more people will be motivated to watch it, and so its popularity grows.

Overall, Bird Box is a gripping film with a thought-provoking premise, featuring a convincing performance from Sandra Bullock. However, I was left feeling slightly unsatisfied. It is ironic that Netflix, the reason for the film’s rapid popularity, might also be the reason why it’s not as memorable a film as it could have been.