Wednesday 16th July 2025
Blog Page 753

Oxford professor faces fourth rape complaint

0

A Swiss woman has filed a criminal complaint for rape against Oxford scholar Tariq Ramadan, who is already being held in custody in France over similar charges.

The allegation by the unnamed woman relates to an alleged incident in Geneva in October 2008. The woman was about 40 at the time.

“At this stage of the procedure, I can confirm that we have filed a criminal complaint,” her lawyer, Romain Jordan, told Radio Télévision Suisse on Friday night. “The complaint puts forward facts that may amount to rape with aggravated circumstances.”

The news follows Ramadan’s detention in France in February on charges that he raped two women. A third woman has since accused the professor of rape.

Ramadan denies all charges, having suggested they may be part of a smear campaign against him.

A professor of contemporary Islamic studies at St Antony’s College, Ramadan took a leave of absence in November, which the University said was “to address the extremely serious allegations made against him”.

Oxford-Cambridge Expressway a threat to rare species, RSPB says

1

A proposed new dual carriageway which will run between Oxford and Cambridge has been criticised for the potential damage it would cause to a local nature reserve.

The RSPB has said that the expressway would pose a serious threat to the Otmoor Nature Reserve and its wetlands.

Calling the proposed route a “disastrous outcome for nature”, a spokesperson for the RSPB has explained that certain species of bat, butterfly and wetland bird could be endangered by the large road.

Bechstein’s bats are one of the rarest and endangered species in the UK – an estimated 1,000 bats populate areas in the south of England – and black hairstreaks are one of the rarest butterflies in the UK. Both species could be put under threat.

The threatened black hairstreak butterfly, which live in their thousands in the south of England

A campaign group, the “Expressway Action Group”, has been set up by Oxfordshire residents to protest the damage that the route could have on the area’s green belt.

The group is supported by 34 Oxfordshire parish councils and has put signs up along the proposed route reading slogans such as “Green belt not commuter belt” and “Trees not tarmac”.

The Expressway is a proposed new road which would run from the A34 to the A14, near Cambridge, running via Milton Keynes. It is hoped that it would complete the missing link between the M1 and the M40.

The National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) gave cause for its construction in 2016 after producing a study on the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford corridor.

The government has identified the corridor as one of the most significant areas of growth in the country. It is hoped that the construction of the road will contribute to the growth of housing and employment.

The NIC, in its “partnering for prosperity” report, described the three major areas of this development as being some of the “fastest growing, innovative, and productive” locations in the UK.

However, they explain that, at the current time, “poor east-west connectivity” is leading to “restricted interaction between these economies”, and further economic growth is threatened by journey times, congestion and housing unaffordability.

Housing Secretary Sajid Javid is expected to approve the creation of up to five new towns along this route in the coming weeks after discussing the proposal in The Sunday Times in March.

Stakeholders are currently being consulted by Highways England, on behalf of the Department for Transport, to gain opinions about which “corridor” between the two university towns is the most preferred.

Salt ‘n’ Sauce Review: Far from a seaside chippy

0

An indoor food court next to an indoor crazy golf course sounds like a childhood nightmare: a place to host a tenth birthday rather than to host an “elevated and dynamic revolution” of a staple of British food.

And in many ways, Salt ‘n’ Sauce’s description of itself as an innovative take on a chippy is bizarre. Of course, it has the basic ingredients. But while there is batter aplenty, smooth and creamy mushy peas, and thick-cut chips, the restaurant is not an archetypal chip shop.

Indeed, as I tuck into my squid burger, lathered with spicy harissa mayo, and wash it down with a craft lager, I can’t help feeling that this experience can’t be any further from the greasy chippies of the South Coast.

But I do not mean this as a bad thing: the burger is excellent. The squid – lightly dipped in salt-and-pepper tempura flour – has been prepared to perfection by a London-trained chef, and the flavour combination is ambitious, but manages to work.

My date for the evening bites into his vegan fried ‘fish’ – actually beer-battered tofu wrapped in seaweed. He agrees: to compare this to a chippy is to compare a high-end brunch spot to a greasy spoon cafe. They are different places, both with their own merits.

Sadly, Salt ‘n’ Sauce does commit one cardinal sin. In my book, incorrectly labelling a portion of fries by calling them ‘chips’ is an almost unforgivable error. In fact, it is made even worse as I look across at Fred, and see his glee as he devours a fatty, indulgent chip butty – including proper chips!

However, my disappointment at the mislabelling is atoned for by the sauces on offer. The tartare sauce is salty and sour, as it should be. It is the kimchi mayo that particularly impresses – spicy, as promised, full-flavoured, and creamy.

And it also sums Salt ‘n’ Sauce up well: a restaurant that started life out as a pop-up in London, and is trying to provide its own spin on a chippy.

But in reality, it is much more high-end than that.

It is fast food, but only in the way that Pret is – it cares much more about flavour and innovation than it does about speed.

The Bill

Vegan Fried Fish – £6.75
Tempura Squid Burger – £8.50
Ultimate Chip Butty – £5.50
Chips ‘n’ Cheese – £3.50
Skinny Fries – £2.25
Mushy Peas – £1.50
Homemade Tartare Sauce – £1.50
Kimchi Mayo – £1.00
2x Schiehallion Lager – £9.50

Total: £40.00

Reversed: A Memoir

0

Nicholas Letchford completed his doctorate in mathematics last year from Oxford University on a full international scholarship. Unknown to his colleagues, Nicholas had been diagnosed with severe learning disabilities as a child, and now his mother, a passionate advocate and teacher for children with reading difficulties, has written a book about his struggles through the education system.

The path from being described as “the worst child I have seen in twenty years” by his school counsellor to an Oxford graduate was not a smooth one. The story takes place in Australia, the UK and the US, since his family moved about. The book makes clear that “learning disabilities are for life,” and even alludes to the challenges he encountered while a student at Oxford. Many of the events recounted are dire and Nicholas himself has avoided reading the whole book. Speaking to me, Nicholas said: “I don’t relate much with that time period. It is almost like the book is about another person.” He says he remembers being stressed a lot during his childhood and has avoided reading the book so as not to relive some painful memories.

After a dismal first year of school in Australia and being tested in WISC of having a low IQ, in the ‘borderline’ category, 6-year-old Nicholas was dismissed by his teachers as pointless to teach. His mother took his education into her own hands, particularly his struggle with reading. Through fun learning games and with a lot of practice, Nicholas finally learnt to read. In the meantime, his parents tried a variety of interventions, some of which turned out to be bogus, such as physical exercises that were meant to help with reading.

One of the striking points the memoir illustrates is the level of abuse children with learning disabilities face, from teachers and others. This was something Lois, Nicholas’s mother, could relate to, herself having struggled to learn to read as a child. After recounting suspicions that Nicholas had been shouted at by his first-year teacher on a regular basis, she recalls an incident from her own schooldays in which she was berated by a teacher for an assignment she handed in. It becomes apparent quite soon that the memoir is as much about the author as it is about Nicholas. Being able to relate helped her to diagnose stumbling blocks and develop strategies to teach reading.

After teaching Nicholas to read, Lois, already qualified as a physical education teacher, retrained specialising in literacy. She was shocked to find the techniques she discovered teaching Nicholas were already prescribed in the academic literature – shocked that these insights had no bearing on classroom practice nor were being implemented even by special education teachers. In the book Lois describes in detail her teaching methods with her students in the USA. She laments the waste of time and resources, when some students after several years of schooling can barely recognise a few words, because the teachers do not use the appropriate methods for such students.

Speaking to me, Lois says that she doesn’t want to accuse teachers, since that will make them defensive. Rather, she would like to see a change of attitude. Instead of labelling some students as being stupid or incapable, she would like teachers to think of ‘what can they do to change things’. In the book, while some teachers encouraged Nicholas and his mother’s efforts, some clearly did not. After Nicholas learnt to read and began to do well in his studies he moved to a new junior-high school in Texas. In his first day, because he struggled to follow some instructions due to his difficulties, in front of the whole class, his pre-Advance Placement math teacher tore up his work and suggested he quit that subject, saying he was not capable of doing it. The incident was humiliating and painful for many years to come. Raising awareness of the difficulties such students face may help avoid similar events in the future.

The memoir Reversed is now out and will be invaluable reading for those interested in special education, particularly teachers and parents.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Reversed-Memoir-Mrs-Lois-Letchford/dp/1947392042/

Mansfield Entz forced to apologise for ‘420’ bop theme

1

Mansfield JCR Entz team was forced to apologise on Friday after students criticised plans for a “420”-themed 0th Week bop that was seen to encourage the use of marijuana and the appropriation of other cultures.

In an email seen by Cherwell, the JCR Entz team outlined plans for the bop to coincide with “a very, very, special day of the year: April 20th a.k.a 420, the internationally recognised day of protest for the legalisation of Marijuana.”

The email read: “‘But’ – you protest – ‘how do I dress as 420? Doesn’t that just mean getting high?’ No! 420 is not about the consumption of da herb itself, and more about the arts, music, and literature surrounding it; it’s a celebration of a rich culture including everything from hippies to Hip-Hop, from Seth Rogan to the Dude.”

Students took to Mansfield JCR’s Facebook group to criticise the Entz team. “Sorry I think the entz don’t get april fools, is this an actual joke?? because there are SO many aspects of the email that we all just received that are deeply wrong and squirm inducing [sic],” one post read.

Another student commented: “I’m genuinely working on the assumption that the Entz email has been hacked”.

The email encouraged “all you (plant) pot-heads out there” to “dress as stoner icons like Snoop Dogg, Todd from BoJack, Shaggy from Scooby Doo, Harold and Kumar – or even the Super Troopers.”

It continued: “Still stuck for ideas? Get creative with puns. ‘Ganjalf’. ‘The Grim Reefer’. A ‘baked’ potato. ‘Ganja Claus’. Make a ’blunt’ statement by just dressing in all green. Don’t forget, there’s always the classic ‘I was going to find a costume for the bop, but then I got high’.”

An addendum at the bottom of the email noted that “the possession and consumption of marijuana is illegal in the UK and against University regulations. The JCR Entz do not condone its usage in any way, both in this event or otherwise. 4/20 is an internationally recognised day of protest for legalisation as well as an iconic aspect of pop culture for our generation, and this is what we intend to celebrate.”

The Entz team sent another email shortly afterwards apologising “for the (no longer) ‘420’ themed BOP this coming Friday. We understand that this was met with offence and we want to apologise dearly to those who were offended.

“We overlooked the clear issues with this theme and now realise our very significant mistake in the matter. We can’t apologise enough.”

They added: “And clearly nor did we expect any members of the College to be dressing in a manner so as to be culturally appropriating any culture.”

The Mansfield Entz team told Cherwell: “We recognised quickly that there were many real problems with this theme and it was consequently changed. To reiterate, the event will not be going ahead with this theme. We regret and apologise for any offence or distress which may have been caused.”

‘She is the one controlling the play’- Rufus Norris’ Macbeth

0

A stage of classroom chairs, a porta-cabin house painted in a dim yellow, and a dishevelled, unkempt cast are not what one would expect from a production of Macbeth at the National Theatre. Far from the opulence and wealth that traditionally characterise Macbeth, Rufus Norris’ version is sparse and bare.

Yet Norris’ decision to lay the stage bare, to have Duncan, who is supposedly the king, wearing a cheap, untailored crimson suit on an otherwise dark stage is an overt reflection of Macbeth’s deceit. Duncan’s throne, a plastic chair, more reminiscent of a primary school than a castle, is worn down and blackened with age. A spare suit, exactly the same as the one he wears, lies to one side, as if his royal outfit were a uniform rather than an emblem of his power. Plastic coverings protect both the throne and the spare suit – protection against the threat of deceit, perhaps.

Yet Duncan is, although he does not know it, exposed. In a party reminiscent of Baz Luhrmann’s Great Gatsby, there is music pounding from a speaker, alcohol flowing freely, as guests pound their cups to the beat, and Duncan obliviously dances away. However, Lady Macbeth doesn’t sit quietly in a corner, for she is no longer the silent partner in her collusion with Macbeth – while Macbeth looks on terrified, Lady Macbeth embraces Duncan into her home.

She entertains him, she dances, she flirts, she knows full well what she is doing, and as her husband looks on, physically sickened by the task before him, Lady Macbeth revels in the knowledge that the man she is dancing with will be dead come the morning. She dons a green coat, concealing her nimble frame and her fragility, providing her with physical strength, but also disguising her mal-intent: she is the one controlling the play. The audience knows it: as she dances, she pushes bits of the set away; she is the one in control of the fast-moving, dynamic stage. Each of the sudden changes, the bursts of music, abrupt though they may seem, are hers.

Anne-Marie Duff, as Lady Macbeth, is able to command the audience and the stage in a way that Kinnear cannot. Indeed, as Macbeth is torn, so too is the actor that plays him – Kinnear appears torn between a loyalty to Shakespeare’s original script and Norris’ desire to make it his own. Macbeth’s soliloquy is literally broken apart by movements of the stage and Kinnear appears a weak Macbeth, confused from the offset.

Duff’s Lady Macbeth, however, passionately kisses her husband, strokes his chest, lays her leg over his. She knows what she is doing, and just as she manipulates Duncan, she manipulates her husband. Norris’ production is a moving theatrical piece that allows Lady Macbeth to be the puppeteer she has so desperately always wanted to be.

Occasionally, the play’s delivery may have appeared abrupt, rushed, and rough around the edges, compressing, condensing and missing lines. The dynamics of the stage, however, and the juxtaposition of the dire setting with Duncan’s royal title lay bare the reality, that Lady Macbeth controls the stage, controls the action, and controls all the men, including her husband.

The Making of Pray it Doesn’t Rain

Pray it doesn’t rain is Nabeela Zaman’s debut documentary, following the plight of rough sleepers in Oxford. It is a poignant and emotive watch for any Oxford student. Nabeela Zaman, the film’s maker, told me about the process of completing such a project and her own views on the issue of homelessness in Oxford.

“Growing up, one of the things I have often reflected on is how grateful I am to have a house. This thought process is also one of the inspirations for the title ‘Pray it Doesn’t Rain’. My original idea was to film this in the coming year. However, I noticed that homelessness was growing and student participation in combatting the problem was growing with it. And so, on a whim, I took my camera into town and started to talk to homeless people.

When I started out, I expected the video to last ten minutes. But, the quantity of my footage quickly grew, so much so that people began to call it a ‘documentary’. In general, I would ask people the same questions adapting them slightly depending on if I was talking to rough sleepers, charities or others. Many people didn’t wish to be filmed but still provided me with insider knowledge. I also asked rough sleepers I interviewed if they wished to go by a fake name. I thought it was important to respect how people decided to present themselves as personal identity is, in a homeless person’s case, the one thing no one can take away from them.

Film was my chosen media because at the time I was just beginning to develop my technical skills, and a film seemed like a more active response to such a systemic problem. Furthermore, film allowed a truly up-close view of homelessness. It put participants front and centre, giving them the freedom to talk about their views. This said, I made sure to accommodate the needs of those who were not happy to be interviewed directly. Some people spoke more freely once the camera had been turned off, but the majority had no particular reaction to being on camera, with most very keen to talk.

As a first-time filmmaker, I’m still learning and I’m not fully satisfied with the film. The project took a couple of months to film, as I was balancing it alongside other projects and, of course, my actual degree! One key piece of advice: really care about who you are speaking to. You may be standing for a long time talking to your subject knowing not all of it will be in the final edit, but it is worthwhile if you are invested in your project.

Talking to a wide range of people led me to believe that no view of homelessness is unilateral. I don’t think it’s important to want my viewers to understand homelessness in a certain way. I care more about how they treat and understand homeless people.

Changing people’s perspectives can be so much easier than we make it out to be. It starts with simple compassion. Smile at people you see on the street, and soon enough they will smile back. Have conversations with rough sleepers that you see.

I also spoke to many organisations in my quest to understand homelessness. Each organisation stood out for different reasons. They were unified in their dedication to helping rough sleepers. Here are a few practical ways for students to help such organisations. The Oxford Homeless Project (based in Cowley) are always looking for volunteers, and so is The Oxford SU campaign, On Your Doorstep. Join their Facebook group, attend their meetings; they’re very understanding for you to simply help out whenever you can. Any help is better than nothing!”

While charity work can sometimes be seen to have a selfish element to it, Nabeela pointed out that she is not promoting this project to portray herself as a ‘good person’. We both agree that ‘the best acts of charity are those done in secret’. However, homelessness is not a problem that can be solved singlehandedly.  We can only solve this issue if we work together and raise awareness. So, why not buy that Big Issue for once?

Nabeela Zaman’s film Pray it Doesn’t Rain is available on Youtube now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV_5reA1HVY&t=1378s

 

 

Oxford PhD student beaten in MasterChef final

4

Oxford PhD student Nawamin Pinpathomrat has been beaten to the title of the 2018 series of MasterChef.

35-year-old bank manager Kenny Tutt had his “best week yet”, according to judges Greg Wallace and John Torode, and was crowned the winner.

Pinpathomrat, who trained as a doctor in his native Thailand, is studying for his PhD at the Jenner Institute.

Despite the result, he won the hearts of the show’s viewers over the course of the series, and ‘Nawamin’ was a top-ten trend on Twitter during tonight’s episode.

After making it to the final of the competition, he told Cherwell: “It means a lot to me.

“Honestly, I didn’t expect to make it this far, but I’ve enjoyed every single moment in the competition.

“Of course, I’m excited to be in the final, but also nervous at the same time.

“The standard is getting higher and higher. I have to cook up to perfection while I have to finish my experiments and write my DPhil thesis – no pressure!”

During tonight’s show, he said: “I just want to enjoy cooking today. I’m going to cook my socks off. I have nothing to lose!

“I’m very proud that I decided to do this. It will stay with me forever.”

Upon hearing about Pinpathomrat’s menu for the evening, Wallace said: “Nawamin – and I mean this in the nicest possible way – you are nuts.

“We’ve never seen anything like it.”

Despite his starter of lobster and scallops impressing the judges, his red curry duck, infused with pear, was called “a bit tough”, and Wallace was critical of his overly-intricate pudding.

“It’s not easy to eat,” he said. “The theatricals are, this time, getting in the way of the dessert, not necessarily enhancing it.”

Pinpathomrat takes his love for cooking from his mother, but cites his grandmother – who taught him that he should grow his own ingredients rather than buying them – as his most important culinary inspiration.

He impressed the judges throughout the series with his unusual combinations of food.

To reach the final, he cooked banana leaf grilled trout curry with wild mushrooms, chilli, basil and lime leaves, served with rice, carved vegetables, and a prawn and salted fish coconut dip.

UCU members vote to accept deal

1

University and College Union (UCU) members have voted to accept a proposed deal from Universities UK (UUK), triggering the suspension of long-running industrial action by university staff.

A total of 64% of members voted to accept the proposed deal, compared to 36% against. There was a record turnout of UCU members, with 63.5% of all eligible voters taking part.

The proposed deal will see the creation of a “Joint Expert Panel”, comprised of actuarial and academic experts nominated in equal numbers from both UCU and UUK.

It is hoped the panel will agree to key principles which will underpin the future joint approach of UUK and UCU to the valuation of the Universities Superannuation Scheme  (USS) fund.

The valuation of the scheme has been a source of contention throughout the dispute, with UCU consistently criticising the methodology used to calculate the USS’s supposed £6.1 billion deficit.

According to UCU Secretary Sally Hunt, the work of the group will also “reflect the clear wish of staff to have a guaranteed pension comparable with current provision whilst meeting the affordability challenges for all parties, within the current regulatory framework.”

However, critics argue that the influence of the joint panel may not be enough. Neither UCU, UUK, or a joint panel of the two can make changes to the scheme. They are reliant on the USS trustees to do that, and they themselves are required by law to decide upon changes to USS pensions by June 30th this year.

The Pensions Regulator has already said that it impossible for them to change the June 30 deadline, meaning there will not be enough time to form a joint expert panel to revalue the scheme.

Moreover, even if The Pensions Regulator tolerates the missing of the deadline, there is still no obligation for the USS trustees to listen to the joint panel if they don’t agree with its findings.

There has been significant criticism of union’s handling of the ballot. Accusations of poor consultation with local UCU branches is a point of particular concern, with the UCU leadership’s decisions to first hold a ballot and then endorse a ‘Yes’ vote going against the wishes of many rank-and-file members.

Cherwell understands that at least 23 UCU branches decided to endorse a ‘No’ vote, with only three calling for members to vote ‘Yes’. However, the majority of branches opted not to take an official position.

Oxford UCU chose not to officially endorse either a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ vote in the ballot. Oxford UCU vice-president, Terry Hoad, told Cherwell:  “In Oxford UCU we are very pleased that the determined action of the union members in our university, along with that of our UCU colleagues around the country, has been effective in persuading the employers to pull back from their earlier proposals to seriously weaken the pension benefits of staff in UK universities.”

“The aim of ending a guaranteed pension level, related to salary, has been replaced by a commitment to establish something comparable to the present scheme. There are also other issues raised by UCU on which the employers have agreed to work with the union.

“Alongside salaries (not extravagantly high for the great majority of university staff), pensions are a very important part of the total package of benefits for all those whose work goes towards maintaining the very high-quality activity in our universities.

“UCU members are very conscious of the fact that when they take industrial action it interferes with the work we share in with students. We have always appreciated the understanding and support we have received from students, who recognise that in standing up for appropriate salary and other benefits for staff we are defending also the interests of current and future generations of students.

“We are naturally very glad that the ending of the industrial action means that we can return to the collaborative work with our students that we and they all desire.”

Cherwell has contacted the University for comment.

Life without Uncle Ben

0

Food at Oxford is great in so many ways: formal halls, roast dinners, College brunch. Despite its various problems — I am probably 50% potato at this point, for a start — it’s pretty good. That being said, there is one thing that my college life leaves to be desired: a kitchen.

Besides three communal microwaves in the JCR, we’re totally kitchen-less until third year. Rediscovering the fun of cooking beyond the realm of Uncle Ben’s is one of the best things about being away from Oxford. At home, food isn’t just sustenance anymore. It’s more than just a mouthful of hummus-coated carbs; it’s a whole process of creation and sharing.

Food at home is, in one sense, different to the whole culture of university. It represents a chance to feel totally content if your creation is not quite what you were expecting. Often, the foods we make and crave during the vacation would never win the Great British Bake Off. For me, this vacation has included soft, fluffy, (definitely not identical) scones and some scavenged homemade plum jam from the back of the fridge. When I was ill and desperate for a plate of comfort food, I indulged in something resembling macaroni cheese — some overcooked pasta bathed in a thin sauce, piled high with a mountain of cheese. Toast slathered with peanut butter, spicy lentil soup, one-pot casseroles. These things are culinary triumphs, but not because of the skills required to make them.

What also makes food in the vacation special is this much-needed chance to share something you’ve made with others, or make it together. Could I go out for breakfast and order waffles in an Oxford café? Absolutely. However, I couldn’t make waffles from scratch, cracking eggs and stirring melted butter and watching flour puff out from the bowl. Nor could I lift a hot, crispy waffle straight out of the pan, still a little doughy inside and dripping golden syrup. In fact, I’m convinced that dancing around the kitchen to Bowie with my brother was what made those squashed, sugar-drenched waffles taste so wonderful in the first place. Food during the vacation is an opportunity to remember the ways that a handful of raw ingredients can be combined to make something special; not just a meal, but a memory.

As we prepare to go back to our high-pressure academic bubble, where our thought processes might feel scrambled and our stress might teeter on the edge of boiling over, cooking food is a glorious opportunity to make something, mess it up, but have fun anyway. The joy is in the process. Last term, my friend drunkenly speculated post-Bridge that, “It’s not the Hassans, is it? It’s the queue. You queue for the queue. The chats. And also the Hassans.” This garbled prophecy rings true as, before I return to the lukewarm embrace of chips and hummus, I prepare to make something involving a vegetable or two – and a lot of fun.