Wednesday 13th August 2025
Blog Page 83

The grey area

0

Dear diary,

Last saturday was the college ball. And oh my God. 

It is a funny thing to become a statistic. It all seems so binary before it happens to you. Are you the zero, or the one? Two distinct states of being, two entirely opposite sides. The “me” and the “not-me”. But what is unclear, is the wide expanse between – the grey area. The rose-tinted glasses, the nights spent crying over “nothing at all”, the times you felt like you never left that room where it happened. For those of you who find yourselves consumed by the “grey” – whether you perceive it to be an off-white or a charcoal grey, know that you are not alone. 

They encourage me to text him, which I wasn’t going to do as he ignored me in Atik and  Bridge in 7th + 8th weeks, and made out with another girl infront of me in 8th week Bridge. But still, I don’t think I was completely done with him as I wouldn’t have done it. So I call him, and he texts me, and I invite him over and he actually comes. 

It is also a strange thing to be so vulnerable in front of an audience of strangers. To tell you all a story that has previously just been known, in this detail, between me and him (and a few close friends, naturally). It feels strange to let you into my first year bedroom, to show you all this scene of the both of us on that single bed, a scene I now know by heart. It makes me feel vulnerable. My favourite teacher, Miss Oxlade, used to teach me Drama. She always said she could never imagine singing in front of a crowd – acting is different, you are playing someone else entirely, but singing is you. I used to like drama a lot, I never minded the crowd. In a lot of ways I feel more comfortable like that. Under the bright theatre lights where you can barely see the audience but you know they are there. It is nice to feel listened to. It is nice to have some distance. 

I take X to my room + we lie on my bed and cuddle and talk. I’m still in my dress and so drunk which he knows cuz I keep telling him he has 4 eyes and the first thing he said to me was “how drunk are you right now?” 

… Anyways, we are in my room, talking. I learn his actual name, X is just a nickname. He sprained his wrist in a boat crash and he has 6 meals a day (I keep trying to feed him breadsticks). He’s in my room from 2am-5am…

Whenever I play this scene back, which I often do, there are three of us in the room. It feels a lot like acting and less like singing, because that girl is not me. In the room, is him, the girl in the green dress, and there is me, the observer. I think about how lovely she looked that night. I envy her sweetness; the way she tried to feed him, to understand him, to show kindness in a way I haven’t quite been able to manage to since. But most of all I pity her, because no matter how many times I replay the scene I cannot save her. I still wear her pretty green dress though. After all, it wasn’t the dress’s fault. 

We start making out (I initiate). He keeps asking if I’m ok with it. Then he takes off his shirt and asks again  “are you ok with it?” and I’m confused + literally think “Oh I guess we are having sex now” which I did want. But maybe not then. I only initiated cuz he seemed like he was going to leave and I didn’t want him to. I never took off my dress – I think I was insecure about my body.

This is probably the time to say if you are a family member or a future employer  – I would prefer it if you clicked off. I want to be able to tell this story, I want to get the words out and as far away from me as possible, and I can’t do that if I feel certain people are reading this. It will be easier for me if my audience is hordes of faceless strangers. Once, I sang a solo in school, in front of a crowd of my friends, in a room with too many windows. It was too bright, it was awkward, and it has been burned into some deep recess of my memory. All I ask is that you are a courteous reader and you don’t make me feel 8 years old again, singing “Hallelujah”. 

After, he cleaned himself up and  then almost looked like he wasn’t going to lie down again. But he did. He also gave me a hickey at one point which now means I am reminded of this bullshit whenever I look at myself. My mum only just noticed it today. She asked “what have you done to your neck?”. I don’t know if she knows what it is or not – probably does. I replied “I don’t know”. But I do. I know what happened and why I did it; that doesn’t make it any better that it happened.

I watched Bridget Jones’ Diary for the first time a few days ago – a super weird way to start this paragraph I know. But I felt so seen by the way that she felt noticed by someone for like 5 seconds and immediately imagined their entire future together. Not to say that I really saw a future with the boy I have been describing, but for a short time before this night he was undeniably important to me. He made me feel noticed, seen, desirable – in a way I hadn’t felt before. I suppose that’s part of why I thought for a long time that it was my fault, because he meant so much to me, because he came when I called. But this still does not excuse his behaviour – my crush did not force him to take advantage of me, my little obsession did not cause him to forget his decency. 

After, he got changed and asked if he was the only guy I’d got with this term. I said something like “why are you asking?”. He tells me we aren’t going to become a “thing” as in a serious thing and that I shouldn’t text him sober. If I drunk texted him, I asked, would he reply? He said “I might” with a smile. So if I want to be used for my body I know who to call. 

When he said to not sober text him I said “why would I do that?” because I never have, and I never will and HE IS THE ONE that came over sober when I was so drunk and took advantage of me in every possible way. But he did ask and I did say yes so maybe I’m so repulsed by him to hide how repulsed I am in myself that I agreed, that I even called him, that I decided, somehow, at some point, that it would be better to be disrespected and used than to be alone. 

I hope for anyone that reads this and sees themselves in my words that you come to a resolution. I hope the endless ways you make it your fault fade away. I hope you see that your story does not have to be air tight – you are not in a court of law, you do not have to cross examine yourself. In truth, it doesn’t matter what you did. If you are in the grey area, then something has happened to you that you know is not what you wanted. That someone has hurt you, properly hurt you – and I hope you see that hurting yourself with these sharp words will not make it better. 

That’s not to say it doesn’t take time to realise this, and you have to realise it for yourself. No matter how you choose to deal with it – spending an entire term in your bedroom because that’s where it feels safest, closing yourself off from anything difficult, and listening to the same songs on repeat, being irredeemably and uncontrollably angry that this happened. If that makes you feel better for a time then that is what must be done. But I hope you will see, eventually, that this fixation will not get you anywhere. That when you spend too much time lying down your joints seize up. That when you stop seeing your friends it makes you more miserable than before. That you have to live your life for you. 

And, with time, you can reconcile yourself with the person this happened to. You can become you. In time, I hope, you will come to be proud of yourself and the way you acted. You will learn to love that person you try so hard to pretend isn’t you. For me, I am proud of the way I tried to show him kindness, I am proud of the way I tried to humble him and ask why I would even think to call him sober. And, ultimately, I am proud of the way I froze up, because it was me trying to protect myself in that impossible situation, and so I am proud of myself for having my own back.

So this article, for me, is what I hope to be the final words in a chapter of my life I would like to move away from. It will always remain a part of my story, and it will certainly affect the way I behave from now on, but I cannot linger here forever. If there is one thing I have learnt from this whole experience it is that I deserve better. 

And a final message to you. You who has read this and thought this sounds oddly similar to a strange night you had in Hilary of your first year. Yes, you. You cannot imagine how many times I have thought over what I would say to you directly, if I could. But really it all boils down to this. I was drunk out of my mind and you were completely sober. I wasn’t, however, drunk enough to forget. While I know you have only ever met me drunk and ditsy, you don’t know the other side.

Because I remember exactly what happened. And I am not afraid. 

Hertford Principal to leave for new role as UN humanitarian chief

0

Hertford College Principal Professor Tom Fletcher announced he will be leaving his role for a new appointment as Undersecretary General for Humanitarian Relief and Emergency Relief Coordinator at the United Nations, leading the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). His last day will be 18th November.

In an email to Hertford, Fletcher recalled how his experience at Hertford “changed his life” in the years he’s been “blessed to see Hertford from every angle”: as a student of Modern History, a night porter, a barman, a JCR president, a summer school guide, an alumnus, an honorary fellow, and the principal. 

After graduation Fletcher served as a UK diplomat in Nairobi and Paris, the foreign policy and Northern Ireland advisor to Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, and David Cameron, and the British Ambassador to Lebanon. Upon returning to Hertford as an honorary fellow, Fletcher was elected as the youngest ever principal in 2020.

He wrote: “On Monday, the UN Secretary General asked me to take [the OCHA role] on. Millions are in dire need of protection and support, including in regions I know and love. I hope you’ll understand why I must go.”

Through two stories, Fletcher emphasised his commitment to accessibility at Hertford during his tenure. A first-generation university student who got the highest mark in Oxford and is now on the frontline of tackling the climate crisis told him last week that “Hertford is base camp.” Another masters student from Syria who got funding from an alumni due to Fletcher’s efforts told him that Hertford is her “sliding door moment.”

Fletcher continued: “There is a student, born today, who will come to us in 2042. They will have had every reason not to make it. But, somehow, they will. And we will be ready for them. And they will change the world.”

During his tenure as Principal, Fletcher oversaw the establishment of the Asseily Scholarship for a student displaced by conflict, persecution, or deprivation, as well as the Sibusiso Scholarship for five African graduate students.

Fletcher was commended by the UN for possessing “strong experience of leading and transforming organisations” and “an understanding of diplomacy at the highest levels”, as well as previous colleague Gordon Brown for his “creativity and resilience”.

As Martin Griffith’s successor, Fletcher will be the sixth successive British head of OCHA. Prior to his selection, over 60 diplomats and humanitarians wrote an open letter to UN Secretary General António Guterres calling for equal consideration of nationals of all member states in deliberation for the role.

Oxford University clarifies policy for student protests

0

Oxford University clarified rules for student protests, encouraging them in an email to “make Oxford a welcoming and inclusive place” and to keep demonstrations “within the limits of the law.” Oxford Action for Palestine (OA4P) argues that some rules have changed to suppress protest.

The rules prohibit protesters from interruption of teaching, occupation of University property, disobeying a reasonable instruction from Proctors, or failing to identify oneself to any University staff. Breaching any provisions may incur punishments such as warnings, fines, or suspension.

Previously, the same rules were only found in Statute XI on University discipline, but now they have been copied to the Guidance on Demonstrations or Protests page.

The University also published a Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech, which supersedes the Code of Practice on Meetings and Events. Previously events required a seven-day notification period, which has now lengthened to 20 days. The new code added that an event may be refused permission if speakers can be reasonably believed to express views “contrary to law” or “highly controversial” – language not found in the older code.

A University spokesperson told Cherwell that the change in language is only for clarification, so policies “remain unchanged and will be enforced”.

The spokesperson said: “The University has set out existing policies that govern how demonstrations and protests within our community should be carried out. This will ensure any protest can be conducted safely and within University rules. When protesters have breached our statutes the Proctors have taken, and will take, disciplinary action.”

When the University put several Statute XI amendments to a Congregation vote in June, students circulated a brief that criticised the new rules as “illiberal, vague, and impractical” while academics submitted a resolution opposing the amendments. The University then withdrew the proposed amendments and are in the process of proposing new ones. 

OA4P, which set up an encampment and organised months of protest last year, believes that some rules have changed with the new wording.

An OA4P spokesperson told Cherwell: “The University has now unilaterally implemented restrictions which were rejected by students, faculty, and staff – many of which are even stricter than those attempted in June. By ignoring community input, the Administration has failed its obligation to meaningfully engage with the University community and instead seeks to police student and staff freedoms of expression.

“Protest is a vital and historically effective way to enact change. It alarms us that the University would seek to suppress this central avenue for students to make themselves heard.”

The University’s email came amid further protest by Oxford Action For Palestine (OA4P) during the September Open Day, during which demonstrators held Palestinian flags during seminars for prospective students and demanded that the University “sever all ties with Israeli genocide”.

Meanwhile, the University has launched a new scheme for Palestinian students in support of “the advancement of learning and rebuilding of higher education in Gaza and the West Bank”. The Palestine Crisis Scholarship Scheme would see graduate students with an offer to study a one-year full time Master’s degree supported by a full scholarship, including a grant for living costs. The University has also extended access to the Bodleian libraries and University Press assets to scholars in the region.

Going out without flunking out: How to write your essay when the room’s still spinning

0

We’ve all been there. The perfect opportunity for a night out, potentially foiled by the un-attempted essay due tomorrow at 4pm. An age-old Oxford conundrum.

I think there are three breeds of people at this University. The first – those who go out, have a blast, and wake up only to send an email asking for an extension. The second – the responsible, soon-to-be-running-a-magic-circle-firm-or-top-tier-consultancy student who stays in, throwing all plans out the window. Then, the third – the social butterfly slash academic weapon who will go out, enjoy their night, and will still get that essay done by 4pm. There is, admittedly, a fourth breed of student who just never gets in this situation, but that’s far less exciting.

The type-three-er is the paragon of Oxford studenthood. They occupy another dimension, whilst the rest of us walk among men. The question on my mind is: how? To edge us all along the trajectory of becoming student 3.0, I’ve done my research into what the perfectly seamless night out to essay crunch-time transition really is.

The suggestions, remedies and advice up for sale are their own kind of weird, and are usually not wonderful. They are all from students who, in moments, have caught a glimpse of the mountain top – a glimmer of the glory that the third breed of Oxford student typically basks in.

Student A, let’s call her, sets her alarm every two hours, and drinks half a bottle of water each time it goes off. An interrupted sleep in exchange for the vital subduing of a hangover. A pretty small price to pay, really.

Student B opts for instantaneous relief. A greasy, fried full English Breakfast; the greasier the better. Yet opting to soak up last night’s remnants in one fell swoop is often too good to be true. Though he’s able to get on the grind once the eggs and beans are down the hatch, B’s skin, stomach, and breath won’t be thanking him two hours later when the queasiness sets in.  

Student C is a diehard green juice slash innocent-smoothie-er. Call it a placebo effect, say it’s psychological all you want, but once you’re halfway through the bottle, you’re already feeling lightbulbs turning on. Student C is incomplete without her best mate D, whose beverage of choice is caffeine, rather than anything natural. No food and three shots of espresso are bound to get you over any deadline you need to meet.

I wasn’t sure this was even a strategy, but according to Goop.com and Student E, bananas are pure gold for nausea and stomach aches. High in electrolyte potassium, they’re meant to subside the concoction of Hussein’s and alcohol sludging up your stomach from the night before.

The next revitaliser is probably the hardest to execute. Student F swears by the power of the mind, claiming that hangovers are an issue of ‘mind over matter’. A hangover is just a mentality – if you say you’re fine, you’re fine. Self-affirmations, manifestations and grit are Student F’s friends.

Along the same wavelength of rather brutal mental tactics, is Student G’s taste for bribery. Nothing good happens until that essay is done. This means, as soon as G is awake, they’re on the grind. In bed, pyjamas on, phone on silent, water only – they’re making things as unpleasant as possible until they can say their essay is done and dusted. G suffers no fools.

I’ve framed this article as a how-to guide, but on reflection, not one of these students really offers a flawless method for transitioning from play-hard to work-hard. These are more ‘bottoms-up bootcamp’ strategies for achieving what really should not be humanly possible. Perhaps I’m wrong and there is a healthy way to meet a deadline after having a brilliant night before. I certainly have not found it yet.

The helliday

0

Picture Bali and you might conjure up images of white sand beaches, cliff-top temples and jungles inhabited with monkeys. Combine that with its legendary party culture, abundance of tourist hostels, and affordable dining scene, and it presents itself as a paradise for young travellers hoping to see a far corner of the world while never straying far from home comforts.

 For the first week, the experience lived up to every expectation. We hiked the famous volcano, Mount Batur, to watch a breathtaking sunrise, learned to surf, and I even felt adventurous enough to try the local food. The local food then decided to try me. My friends and I had approached the trip with the motto ‘catch flights, not feelings’, and it appears we completely forgot to add ‘or parasitic infections’ to that list. A week in, I found myself completely caught out. 

There was nothing to be done. After 5 days of refusing to eat or leave my bed (with the regular exception of a visit to the porcelain throne), my friends and I decided it was high time I fought back against the war waging in my stomach. It was time to visit… Nusa Medica.

The clinic was an oasis of air conditioning and while-tiled floors in the middle of the sweltering jungle. Stepping inside removed me temporarily from my suffering as I felt overwhelmingly reminded of the SSL – with the marked difference being that everyone around me had an intact will to live; this being a hospital. I’m also not sure any Bodleian library would have approved the blasting of Bees Gees’s ’Stayin’ Alive’ over a bluetooth speaker, but my friends are nothing if not top motivators. 

I spent the night there with two other sorry looking folks. Together, we resembled a collaboration between Britts on Tour and 24 hours in A&E (the Balinese version). On the right side of my privacy-curtain was an elderly Geordie named John, who appeared to be in perfectly good health, other than the fact he was in hospital. Meanwhile, on my left side, there lay the unfortunate victim of what appeared to be a werewolf attack; he didn’t speak much, bled a lot, and had an alarming chunk of human flesh (yes, really) perched ominously on his sideboard. Despite his condition, he managed to win me over by sparing the odd sympathetic glance every time I walked past to answer the call of nature, clinging to my IV drip post like Gandalf with a bad back. Owing to the fact that this was a twice-an-hour occurrence, I found myself growing fond of him and rather missed him when he perished in the night. Kidding – he was moved to the Island’s main hospital. Mysterious bleeding man, if you’re out there reading this, I wish you all the best.

My hospital stint remained only a stint as, the very next day, my two friends burst into the clinic to break me out. Our flight was to depart that night at 9pm and they were determined that I was to be on it. Haggling is a large part of Indonesian market culture, but it was rather uncomfortable to see my health treated in the very same way.. The nurses –  rays of sunshine – prophesied my demise at each turn and remained bewildered as my friends spoke at length of my vibrant energy and good health. I lay there watching the drip-drip of my IV, and wishing John wasn’t spending so long in our shared bathroom. At this point, due credit must be issued to our tutorial teaching system. With not a drop of medical knowledge between them, my friends waffled their way into persuading the healthcare officers to issue my release from Nusa Medica within the half-hour. Watch out, Downing Street.

 Some friends offer a shoulder to cry on, other friends make you laugh. Some friends bundle you out of hospital into a cab, through security, onto a fight, onto another flight, and then onto a train home from Heathrow. A small, mature part of me recognises that difficult experiences teach us lasting life lessons, and I can safely say I now realise the importance of travelling with good company. Other departing wisdom includes taking out solid health insurance and listening to the advice of other travellers regarding which food is safe to eat. Also avoiding werewolves in the Uluwatu area of Bali.

The Oxford-Cambridge Arc is too good an opportunity to ignore

0

Now is not a good time to be a nimby. With the return of compulsory housebuilding targets, it is the new government’s ambition to build 1.5 million homes by the end of the next parliament. These new developments must be complemented by infrastructure systems, local services, and a sense of place. 

That’s where the Oxford-Cambridge arc comes in. Labour’s new houses have to go somewhere, and the arc that spans Oxfordshire, Northamptonshire, Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, and Cambridge is a good bet. Oxford and Cambridge are powerhouses of innovation in the UK, playing host to the two best universities in the world. Milton Keynes is the largest new town in the UK. There is an international airport at Luton. The arc contains six science parks, 17 research and technology zones, and 10 universities. Most towns have rail links to London in under an hour. 

To not have a direct link between these economic assets is madness. East West Rail would reduce the Oxford-Cambridge journey to 1 hour 30 minutes, nearly halving typical journey times which require two changes in the capital. A new motorway wasn’t the answer, and the expressway was rightly cancelled. But an electrified railway, alongside a commitment to sustainable and sensible housing developments, such as on brownfield sites, continued local consultation, and funding for rewilding, can only be a positive. Investment in growth must be spread throughout the country, but this opportunity is simply too good to miss.

James O’Brien on Brexit, Boris Johnson, and making radio go viral

0

Journalist, broadcaster and bestselling author of three books, James O’Brien has been leading Britain’s conversation for 20 years. His signature qualities – clarity, wit, intellectual honesty and a masterly style of interrogation – have earned him 1.4 million weekly listeners and the title of “conscience of liberal Britain.” I spoke to him at the studio at LBC:

Cherwell: We’ll start with a few quick getting-to-know-you questions. Three favourite meals?

O’Brien: So, fish and chips with mushy peas. A really good souvlaki, in Greece, the full-on pita Kalamaki wrap. And then probably a Sunday roast.  

Cherwell: Three favourite novels? 

O’Brien: The Catcher in the Rye by JD Salinger, Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen, and… any of the CJ Sansom books about Matthew Shardlake.  

Cherwell: Three favourite films? 

O’Brien: If, the Lindsay Anderson Film. The Wizard of Oz. And Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back. 

Cherwell: Looking at your early life, what stands out to you in light of your later career? 

O’Brien: The fact that my father was a newspaper journalist is probably the most significant element. Our relationship with the news was almost constant. We’d always have the radio on in the car, it would always be the news, on the drive to school it was the Today programme was on with Brian Redhead. On television, in the days when we only had one screen in the house, the nine o’clock or ten o’clock news was always on. Before the internet my dad would only establish the next day’s task by watching that day’s task.  

Cherwell: When did you know that that was what you wanted to do?  

O’Brien: Looking back, I think I just wanted to be like my dad, as all sons who are lucky enough to have amazing dads do. I wanted to be either an actor, a journalist or a politician, pretty much as long as I can remember. It was only when I got onto Fleet Street that I discovered I wasn’t cut out for being the kind of tireless news reporter my dad was. He was fearless in the pursuit of a story whereas I was crippled with anxiety in the pursuit of almost anything.  

Cherwell: Did journalism appeal to you even in your schooldays? 

O’Brien: Yes. At prep school, aged 7 to 13, I set up my first newspaper which was called The Winterfell Times, which indicates how early these ambitions set in. At public school I set up a magazine called The Grapevine – with Bill Cash’s son, actually, so it was a broad political spectrum. It was all about newspapers for me until later I accidentally fell into broadcasting. I was serious about acting by the time I got to LSE. I wanted to go to drama school but part of the deal I struck with my mum – because I got expelled from school, unfortunately, and my parents had spent all this money on my education – was that I’d get an LSE degree, and if I still wanted to be an actor they’d help me through drama school. But halfway through the LSE I saw Michael Sheen in a play called When She Danced, opposite Vanessa Redgrave, and I think he’d been plucked from his final year of drama school to play that part. I remember saying to my girlfriend at the time, ‘There’s no way I’m going to be an actor’, because I watched his performance and thought, if he’s top of the premier league, I’m going to be tenth division if I’m lucky. I’ll never be that good in a billion years, I thought, he’s got something magical. I wanted to find something I could be really, really good at. And getting expelled from school was not the best preparation for a career in politics, although I’d never have been one of those kids who go straight from university to the party, in a research role and then a safe seat. I was detached as a student, all my mates were in London, and I stepped back a bit from the student life. If I’d been immersed in student life at somewhere like Oxford, I think I’d have ended up even more unbearable, I’d have got heavily involved in the Union. 

Cherwell: Yeah, you don’t want to go near there. So, when journalism was the only option left, what was your first break? 

O’Brien: It didn’t happen for me. My father was made redundant by the Telegraph in my final year of school, and it was five years later that I was trying to enter the field, so he didn’t really have any contacts left. I hadn’t had any experience, I’d been too busy acting, doing things like the Edinburgh Festival. But in my final year at LSE, Charles Moore, then editor of the Sunday Telegraph visited the university. And he used to shadow my dad in Birmingham. I buttonholed him, reminded him of his association with my father, and asked for some work experience – very naively and arrogantly thinking that that would be it, I’d get some experience at the Telegraph and never leave. But at the end of the two weeks it was thank you very much and goodbye. So my student job became my job job, and I was selling suits in Regent Street. I actually loved it: working in retail is 80% colleagues. I worked with a great bunch of lads, and we also had some prominent customers.  

Cherwell: You mentioned a story about a Lady once on the radio.  

O’Brien: Yeah, that was grim. She brought her son’s pyjamas back to exchange them and let’s just say when I took them out of the bag it was very clear they’d been worn very enthusiastically… One day, I got sent Downing Street because John Major wanted to buy a suit. He was very charming and he bought three suits, one white. Now, John Major was portrayed in the UK media as grey – in Spitting Image his skin was grey – so the idea he bought a white suit, I knew that was a story. The Daily Express offered me some money for the story. I said, Can I have two shifts instead? And they said Yes. And that was my foot in the door. It was a nightmare in some ways, some bits of the job I was appalling at. But from there I got onto the Evening Standard and the Daily Telegraph and after 18 months, I was able to live on journalism. 

Cherwell: How did you get into LBC? 

O’Brien: I became a roving showbiz reporter and would get invited onto TV programmes to comment on showbiz stories. It was exciting, more than working on newspapers. I might not know much about the topic that week but – spoiler alert – nobody does. These days you watch some of these weird new TV channels and it’s as if they’ve just found someone in the canteen and called them a ‘political commentator’. I became Showbiz Editor at the Express – the money was extraordinarily good compared to what your generation can expect, and invitations to all the good parties – and started talking about other topics as well. I started getting positions on TV shows. One day I was in the ITN building on Grays Inn Road and there was an emergency replacement for the other panelist, a woman called Sandy Warr who presented a show on this radio station called LBC. She told me her holiday cover had just cancelled and that I should phone the programme controller. I said I’d never done anything like that in my life. She said all I had to do was talk when the light came on. So I did. And I haven’t left yet. 

Cherwell: When did you get your own show? 

O’Brien: I got a slot at 10PM Sunday nights. I did that for six months, listening figures came in and they gave me a breakfast show. I did that for six months, listening figures came in and they gave me a weekday show. 

Cherwell: The format of your show was different then to what it is now, though? 

O’Brien: Was it? How do you know? You weren’t born! 

Cherwell: That’s what I’ve heard.  

O’Brien: The format was more traditional but what I loved most was talking to the microphone as if it were one person. If I’m in the bath or the car or the bed with you, there is one person I’m talking to, in the office, in your ear – after I realised that everything fell into place. It was my job to get people to ring in or keep listening. I realised I shouldn’t be booking guests to do that, I should be able to do that myself. The more people I spoke to, the more political I got. 

Cherwell: And it was a big political guest in 2014 who made the show go viral. 

O’Brien: This is Nigel Farage [pronounced Farridge]. That was very weird. Until then, if I did something brilliant on the radio, you’d never know unless you listened to it; the notion of the viral clip was utterly alien. Quite a convoluted story about how Farage ended up in the studio, but he thought he was coming in to have his tummy tickled or to somehow get the better of this bloke on the radio. It didn’t work out like that. He completely soiled himself in the studio. I helped him, obviously, but I couldn’t have done it without him. That was the first time a clip went on YouTube and got halfway round the world. 

Cherwell: I’d definitely recommend everyone reading this to give that clip a watch. What happened next?

O’Brien: The Newsnight Deputy Editor rang the producer thinking that the producer had been in my ear giving me the lines. They had a meeting and established that it was me they were interested in, and I went to see them, and occasionally presented Newsnight for a while. Meanwhile LBC was going from strength to strength and when the choice came, I chose radio over TV, and carried on building what I’d spent the previous 10 years building. 

Cherwell: 2016 with Brexit was when the show really took off, wasn’t it? 

O’Brien: Yes, there were so few places in the British media where reality Remained – to use a pun. People would ring me and repeat the lines Boris Johnson or Nigel Farage or David Davis had said, I’d ask one or two questions, and they’d fall apart. It went truly bonkers. It wasn’t happening anywhere else. Almost every paper had encouraged its readers to vote for this insanity. The slim chance of damage control disappeared the minute Nick Timothy told Theresa May to appease the racists by abolishing free movement, which meant the end of the single market and the customs union. I still don’t know how much of it they understood, and with every year you realise how little genuine intelligence there was in most of these rooms. It became a rare place in the UK media, and my show was the only place where you had to back up rhetoric with facts. If you told me we had to leave the EU to make our own laws, I’d ask what laws you wanted to make or don’t like having to obey at the moment. It went mad to the point where the New York Times ran a piece on the man who made radio go viral. There used to be snobbery attached to this format. People would say ‘Oh, it’s just some thicko from Dagenham who can’t string a sentence together, it’s like shooting fish in a barrel’, but that’s offensive and deeply patronising, because the Jacob Rees-Moggs and Nigel Farages of this world have no more answers. 

Cherwell: What’s your technique and aim with these callers? 

O’Brien: I used to be a bruiser, I’d like a fight and that worked for a while. Subsequently, partly because I had therapy and stopped living life with my fists up, I just asked people calmly to explain themselves. We lived during this period of extraordinarily strong opinions built on nothing, as if the louder you shouted, or the more robustly you accused someone of being a traitor to the country, the less scrutiny there was of what you were actually saying. The customers of the snake-oil salesmen would turn up, I’d ask them to prove their points, and they couldn’t. And I just wouldn’t let up, I’d keep them on the phone for 20 minutes at times. You rarely hear that absurd inflated confidence being properly deflated, because usually they’ll move on or change the subject. I don’t like doing that. These people have robbed my children of freedom of movement, they’ve robbed my countrypeople of economic stability – and they’ve done it on a stupid poster or a racist lie. 

Cherwell: Have you considered the value of the show as social documents? It gives a better picture of society after 2016 than a lot of other outlets. 

O’Brien: I hadn’t thought of that. I hope it’s not conceited to say that, now you’ve pointed it out, I acknowledge and am quite proud of that. I came to write a book that is essentially a document of that period, very much drawing on what I’ve learnt from conducting phone-ins. If you want to know how we ended up with Boris Johnson or Liz Truss as prime minister, you couldn’t have had a better job for twenty years than speaking to the people who believed their nonsense. The archive, to use a pompous word, will provide insights into how people ended up defending such epic corruption. 

Cherwell: I’m glad you brought up your books as well. It’s three books – How to Be Right, How Not to be Wrong, How They Broke Britain. Did you feel a drive to write rather than speak? 

O’Brien: I mean, they’re very different books. The first is a digest of my radio hits. The second was written after I’d had therapy to deal with a family crisis, and I learnt so much about being wrong, holding and arguing toxic opinions; it was so revelatory I wanted to write about it. The latest one was murderously difficult to write. It was like being at college, proper hard work, loads of references and research. But I wanted to prove these ten people were culpable and I had to dig very deep. It was hugely enjoyable and at moments it was like flying a kite, but at other times I couldn’t get up on Sunday mornings to write. That killed any temptation to shift towards writing as a career path. 

Cherwell: Any other potential book ideas? 

O’Brien: I’ve got a novel set in a boarding-school that’s been bubbling away in the back of my brain for a very long time. But I don’t know if I’ve got the talent or levels of application for it. I don’t have more plans for non-fiction, unless I have an idea as appealing to me as How They Britain. If I do write more, then I have to sit down at the desk again for six hours. 

Cherwell: Who is your biggest influence as a journalist? 

O’Brien: Ooh… I don’t have one. The journalists and presenters I admire the most are Michelle Hussein, Emily Maitlis, Victoria Derbyshire, Eddie Mair. The journalists who do what I try to do: tell stories in a way that people find illuminating and engaging. Eddie had that ability to connect with somebody. Jonathan Ross, we used to plan car journeys according to when he was on air. That’s what I aspire to, to have that communication with the listener which is so personal. 

Cherwell: Final question: looking to the future, any other things to tick on the bucket list?  

O’Brien: I mentioned a novel. A tiny bit of unfinished business: I’d take the right TV project if it came along, because I had to leave Newsnight when I didn’t really want to. But I’ve never felt at home on telly as I do on the radio. So, I know it sounds weird for a 52-year-old, but not really anything more on the bucket list. When I was 42, I’d have told you resentfully about all the things I wanted to do which hadn’t happened, but oddly, since 2016, they pretty much have. 

James O’Brien’s latest book, How They Broke Britain, is out now in paperback. You can find my review of it here.

JSoc and ISoc host antisemitism, Islamophobia trainings across college Freshers’ Weeks

0

Jewish Society (JSoc) and Islamic Society (ISoc) will organise antisemitism and Islamophobia training sessions at over a dozen colleges this Freshers’ Week. Several colleges accepted one society’s offer but not the other’s.

Over summer, JSoc reached out to all JCRs and MCRs over summer, offering to send a representative to deliver a presentation “on the Jewish community, the history of antisemitism, how to identify it, and how to report it,” according to the society’s email.

JSoc president Kai Ogden told Cherwell that to date, twelve common rooms have shown interest, with most of them confirmed. Most colleges that declined cite timetabling issues, so JSoc is also working on ways to support these colleges to make them a safe and inclusive space for Jewish students.

Similarly, ISoc contacted 30 colleges, 16 of which have arranged workshops with their freshers. While the remaining colleges are still considering, some JCRs have been unresponsive or declined the workshops, according to ISoc president Aman Sultan.

At least four colleges only accepted one society’s workshop but not the other. It is unclear which colleges and why.

Oriel College, who declined the workshops, told Cherwell that “it is customary to only include induction events organised by Oriel College or its JCR”. Oriel did not comment on whether alternative inclusivity training would take place. Corpus Christi College also declined, while Christ Church College did not respond, according to ISoc.

ISoc is working with Oxford University’s EDI (equality, diversity, inclusion) team to receive support for its workshops “designed to educate students on recognising and addressing bias within Oxford, unpacking the negative media and political perceptions, and discussing specific challenges faced by Muslim students in this environment,” Sultan told Cherwell.

The society is also providing information to the EDI team for a University staff briefing. This comes amid the University’s calls to “make Oxford a welcoming and inclusive place” in an email to all students.

Sultan continued: “Islamophobia has indeed become a more pressing concern within the University over the past year. We believe that a lack of education on the topic for both staff and students has allowed the issue to persist. Many Muslim students have personally faced Islamaphobic comments, discrimination, and even harassment within the university and city, which highlights the need for proactive measures to address this growing concern.”

The Vice-Chancellor in review

This article is an updated version of a piece in the W0 print.

Irene Tracey is used to doing uncontroversial good. She has dedicated her remarkable career in anaesthetic neuroscience to understanding and preventing pain. She’s a fierce advocate for women in STEM, involved in several mentoring programmes. In January 2023, she became the first state-educated and second female Vice-Chancellor in the University’s history. Initiatives like the Colloquium and development of the Schwarzmann Centre speak to her administrative abilities. But mere administration is not governance and reviewing her tenure thus far paints a mixed picture: she hasn’t fully managed to diffuse challenging political situations or solve structural issues concerning pay and college disparities, though some progress has been made.

The Vice-Chancellor is the face of the University. This means responding to controversy, and Tracey has faced some unenviable issues in her tenure since January 2023. When ‘gender-critical’ feminist Kathleen Stock’s planned address to the Oxford Union in June 2023 stirred a maelstrom of transphobic rhetoric, calls to cancel, and protests, Tracey responded by defending free speech and Stock’s “right to come and speak”. Months later, she expressed regret at the University’s handling of the situation, saying they “should have done more” to support the trans community. In trying to tread a middle ground, Tracey struggled to clearly advocate on behalf of either side. 

In some ways, it is a peculiarity to install academics into governance positions. Academia, particularly science, involves specialisation, engaging in careful inquiry for months, and refusing to conclude without a high degree of confidence. By contrast, an executive like a Vice-Chancellor must generalise, act quickly in the face of scandal, and weigh unclear trade-offs. Uncontroversial good is hard to come by. Acting decisively can come at the expense of the necessary precautions, whilst vacillation can prolong problems.

In the wake of strong pro-Palestine protests, when 17 members of Oxford Action for Palestine (OA4P) were arrested, Tracey took a harder line than some university vice-chancellors, condemning the action as “violent and criminal”. It’s not clear whether this was in fact the case, but the tact did deter much more protest, as well as provoking consternation. The University waited a month after the establishment of the OA4P encampment to meet with students from the group (though the University has said it met individual affiliated students before then in an unofficial capacity),  and agreed to regular meetings on the final day of Trinity term. The University’s efforts have not been negligible: they have implemented a crisis graduate scholarship scheme for Palestinian students and an expansion of the Bodleian’s online service to students in Palestinian universities. But engagement with calls for divestment and review of investments, top demands among student protesters, which some universities have committed to assess, has been underwhelming. Tepid plans for an “accelerated” review of investments into companies manufacturing arms that are illegal under UK law were hardly ambitious. 

Tracey calls herself the “ultimate insider”, and this is no exaggeration: postdoctoral stint at Harvard aside, Irene Tracey has been living, learning, or teaching in Oxford for her entire life. Maybe this limits the extent to which she can look outside the institution and see different ways of doing things. Oxford has been criticised by its University and College Union (UCU) branch for low pay and prevalence of insecure zero hours, hourly paid, or fixed-term contracts, even over decades of work. A UCU report last year found that 66% of academics were on fixed-term contracts, double the national average. Tracey named pay and conditions a “priority” for her and commissioned an independent analysis on the matter, which resulted this June in some pay increases, extension of benefits, and a promise to “change the culture” around contracts. How substantial this culture change is remains to be seen; the report’s requirement is that departmental heads review contract status annually – after four consecutive years of work under fixed-term contracts. At the same time, the University continued ill-fated litigation against two academics fighting to be recognised as full employees after 15 years of teaching. The tribunal ruled the pair should have been classed as employees in a case that attracted significant media attention for the University. 

Financial disparities between colleges, another hot-button issue within the University, was recently highlighted by a report by the Student Union showing vast differences in wealth translate into disparities in the price of accommodation, student bursaries, and even academic results. Tracey’s steps have been incremental – introducing university-level mental health provisions, thereby standardising support across colleges – but she has largely refrained from addressing the problem head-on. College autonomy is certainly structurally and socially established, and is what allows Oxford to offer such a distinct experience, but serious problems with the design are unlikely to be solved by college-led action. Active support by the Vice-Chancellor of the new energy injected by the SU’s campaign would be welcome. Vice-Chancellors ought to tackle such fundamental ‘big picture’ issues, not shy away from them. Coordination across the University isn’t out of reach: just take the Vice-Chancellor’s Colloquium, Tracey’s initiative and a praiseworthy programme designed to bring together the disparate academic branches of Oxford using her convening power. A similarly unitary approach could be directed at more contentious issues. 

Tracey has not held the post of Vice-Chancellor for long, and perhaps some of these teething problems are the result; a good leader takes time to survey the landscape and command authority. But Tracey is past the stage in which she could be called new. Her instincts as an academic – to observe at length, to look for uncontroversial good, to reject partial solutions – may restrict her willingness to seize the moment. We need only look to America’s Ivy League, where four out of eight university presidents resigned amidst campus demonstrations, to conclude it’s a difficult time to lead. And Oxford’s structure is both idiosyncratic and difficult to change. In a less troubled time, Tracey would doubtless excel at Oxford’s helm; but now, real movement forward may require bolder strokes.

One of this piece’s three authors has publicly supported an open letter by OA4P. 

The original version of this article, found in the W0 print, falsely implied the Pay and Conditions outcome and recommendation report had not yet been released. The report was in fact published in June.

We need boldness on Brexit

0

Each time I hear that Labour has dismissed yet another offer from EU states to establish reciprocal freedom of movement deals for young people, I despair.

How can the leaders of an outward-looking, pragmatic, centre-left party – which never backed Brexit – be so unforgiving in restoring rights to our generation that they themselves once enjoyed?

Over the past year, I’ve spent months stressing over visas, standing in endless queues for residency permits, and surrendering my passport countless times. This is our post-Brexit reality.

If I were part of Keir Starmer’s political generation, I wouldn’t want to reopen Pandora’s box either: reigniting the Brexit debate after almost a decade of pernicious, populist wrangling that brought down governments, maimed the economy, and tore society apart? No thanks.

But I am not. I belong to the generation that didn’t get a vote in the Brexit referendum but lost our rights to live and work abroad.

I understand Starmer’s strategy: don’t rock the boat, make subtle tweaks to the withdrawal agreement. A veterinary certificate deal here, a reassessment of visa policies for touring musicians there. It’s better than nothing, but we deserve more than timidity.

I’m not suggesting Labour should seek to rejoin the EU. That kind of change must come from a new political generation. But while we languish in limbo, it’s up to young people to break this unholy consensus of silence.

Brexit has left the UK facing a 4% long-term decline in productivity and a 15% drop in trade. Meanwhile, new trade agreements with non-EU countries have delivered negligible gains.

Given the dire state of the economy, the UK needs deeper integration with Europe, not to champion economic renewal while ignoring the obvious – that the Brexit deal must be fundamentally reworked. Until then, supplementary Irish passports will serve as a new currency, sparing fortunate dual nationals from this post-Brexit nightmare.

Freedom of movement isn’t some far-fetched compromise – we have similar deals with 13 other countries. This is about political will – and whether young people are truly a priority for the new government.