The creator of The Thick of It is probably used to being ushered through the corridors of power. We, however, are not. So when we sit down with Armando Ianucci in a secluded corner of the Unionโs Gladstone Room, itโs fair to say we feel a little out of place.
Benn: Were you a member of the Union when you were here?
โWell I wasnโt a member of the Union when I was an undergraduate, but I came here when they had a comedy club down in the basement in what was then called the Jazz CellarโI donโt know if itโs still called the Jazz Cellar.โ
Benn: Now itโs called โPurple Turtleโ
โOh of course it isโ
Benn: They made that obvious leap. It is notoriously the worst club in Oxford.
โWell I remember at the time it was a terrible room to play inโvery long. So thatโs where Herring used to perform, and Al Murray. It was interesting.โ
John: Is there a reason why you think Cambridge seems to be the dominant force in comedy now?
โActually, I felt that even thenโin my year the Cambridge Footlights were taking off with Fry and Laurie, and here [in Oxford], it was Radioactive and Rowan Atkinson and some of Monty Python. And that was it. Maybe some Beyond the FringeโI donโt remember.โ
John: Do you think satire is dead or just slightly unwell?
โI donโt think itโs is unwell but I do think that itโs going through a bit of a rethink. As Iโve said many times Trump is his own joke. He distorts what he says and turns it into laughable exaggeration. So what do you do? And itโs interesting, it seems the people who seem to be getting through are people like John Oliver who have traditional journalistic resourcesโtheyโre saying, โWell, letโs look at the factsโ. Heโs doing all the fiction stuff, so letโs look at the facts.โ
John: Do you think the scrutiny, or that level of coverage has actually helped him?
โI worry that the media havenโt quite realised that it has a kind of duty if itโs under attack. It has to abandon, โWell we mustnโt say anything too controversialโ. Obviously youโve got to be careful but I think the media has to start from a position of โOkay, letโs examine the truth, and if the truth is unpalatable: well I think we need to be able to broadcast thatโ. And at the moment I think theyโre a bit nervous.โ
John: So do you think thereโs anything off limits in comedy?
โNo, no, well obviously that doesnโt mean you can just say anything without having thought about it. Do you know what I mean? Just insulting or offending or swearing for the sake of it, I donโt think is funny. There has to be a kind of line of either thought or argument behind it.โ
John: You must think swearing is a bit funny though?
โIt is a bit funnyโbut in context. In context itโs fucking funny.โ
Benn: Yes, of course. You said that you โthink your comedy throughโ, but do you write for different audiences? So letโs say youโre writing for an American audience with Veep, versus a British one?
โNo, no, youโll never write your best stuff if youโre writing what you think someone else is going to laugh at. Youโre already downplayingโlimiting yourself. And I always say that especially to first time writers who want to write comedy, always write what makes you laugh, not what you think will make some 45 year old programme controller laugh. Thatโs not a guarantee of success, but it will at least mean that youโre writing your best stuff. And when we wrote stuff like Veep we just wrote what we thought would be funnyโwe went out and researched it, and found the characters. So youโre writing for those voices but fundamentally youโre writing for yourself. And also it ties into the idea that, well, comedy is universalโand if you find it funny then chances are someone else will find it funny.โ
Benn: And do you build a particular character around a particular actor? So was Malcolm Tucker built around Peter Capaldi?
โNo, well, itโs a two-way thing. With someone like Steve [Coogan], we evolved Alan Partridge having already started with Steve as it were. For Malcolm Tucker we wrote the character but he wasnโt Scottish in the first script. You audition people, you cast people. Peter came, he was great, suddenly Malcolmโs Scottish. And so you write for Peter, you write for himโfor how he channels Malcolm.โ
John: And do you think the world of comedy needs Malcolm Tucker more than ever, especially now that he can travel through time and things like that?
โYes. I think maybe youโre confusing some different genres, characters.โ
John: Yes, maybe. Iโm an irregular viewer. Well, what about Alan, do you think Alan speaks to anything essential in human nature? Is that why heโs proved so enduring?
โItโs so funnyโeveryone knows an Alan. No one admits to being Alan themselves.โ
John: But some of them are Alan, there are some out thereโฆ
โYes, exactlyโฆ itโs like in Veep. Thereโs this character, Jonah, whoโs the least โpleasantโ. And everyone in Washington always says they โknow a Jonahโ, but again itโs not them, but someone else.โ
Benn: And have you watched anything of The Trip? How do you think Steve the actor compares to that Steve?
โWell, these are exaggerations: I mean Steve can be a bit detached if he wants to be, and Rob, well, Rob can be a bit boisterous, too. But they knowโI remember Steve telling me that when they do these improvised bits where they insult each other, and they actually say extremely true things about each other, and at the end of the tape they kind of look away all embarrassed.โ
John: Would you describe yourself as misanthropic?
โI kind of, bizarrely, Iโm a bit of an optimist really. Maybe itโs the British comedy traditionโyou know, we like people who havenโt quite succeeded or we like flawed characters. Whereas in America most of the characters seem to be successful, good looking, but a bit wacky. Here we like people with ambitionโฆbut whose ambition is never quite met.โ
John: And do you find your taste in comedy has changed as youโve grown older, written more?
โI donโt know, I still like silly stuffโI still like Toast of London, and Amy Schumerโs funny. Bojack Horsemanโโ
John: BoJackโs so depressing!
โI know, I know.โ
John: Itโs too true to lifeโeven though heโs a horse…
โYes, he is a horse. I tend to watch a lot of drama now. Maybe itโs because Iโm doing comedy during the day that I just want to not think about joke. โ
John: Do you ever feel like you canโt muster โthe funnyโ?
โYeah, yeah, if youโve been spending all day, especially watching on screen, if youโre editing. you want something else thatโs different.โ
Benn: Am I right in saying you started a DPhil in Milton? How did you make the leap from that?
โWell it wasnโt a leap. I mean I never finished it, because in those three years I did a lot of comedyโ
John: You might have to return to it now that satireโs dead
Benn: Would you?
โNo! I did a programme on BBC2 about Paradise Lost and I got a very nice note from my supervisor saying โconsider the thesis completeโ. But the truth was I stopped after three years because I thought, โIโm not doing it, and Iโm doing the Oxford Revue and one-man shows and stuff like thatโ and I thought, โClearly this is the direction weโre going in and weโre not going in that directionโโ
Benn: So you donโt think thereโs anything of Miltonโs Satan in Malcolm Tucker?
โNo, although for this BBC2 documentary we suddenly realised that Milton himself was Oliver Cromwellโs spin-doctor. He was called โsecretary for tonguesโ, and his job was to justify the republic to the European courtsโthe royal courts of Europe. He had to write in French or Latin or whatever, defenses of republicanismโso he was Miltonโs spin-doctor. [thumps the table] So there you go, thatโs interesting isnโt it?โ
John: Do you think comedians are quite weird in general, not you, but others?
โNo, obviously Iโm very normalโbut all of the rest of them areโdefinitely. No, some are and some arenโt. For some, thatโs just how they are. Thatโs their personality.โ
John: Is there anything compulsive about the need to make people laugh… a substitute for love?
โWell certainly standupsโwho do that kind of three or four gigs a night thing, you know, and then when theyโre off theyโre just reciting their lines to you and how well the laugh went. You just think โStop thatโI donโt read out my overnight ratings to you, so why are you telling me which part of the audience liked which lineโโฆ
John: Are you going to vote Lib Dem in the next election?
โIf pushed Iโd advocate that people try and stop Theresa Mayโs majority going into the billions by voting for whoeverโs best placed to supplant her. So in my constituency that would be a Lib Dem, in other constituencies that would be Labourโฆโ
Benn: Do you every wish youโd written a character like Jeremy Corbyn?
โI think that would get a bit bored. In fact, Iโd probably start crying.โ
John: Do you ever feel any kind of nostalgia for the New Labour days?
โWell the sad thing about Blair is that take away the whole Iraq thing and it was a pretty good record, do you know what I mean? Itโs a shame it wasnโt a bit more daring, but it was pretty goodโthe health system, the education system was in pretty good nick. And then the Iraq thing just made you completely question how politics worksโthat people can do that without any sort of check in balance. And how much actually did we spend on that war? How much is the state of our economy not actually partly a product of how much we must have spent on propping up a government in Iraq as well as the invasion. Itโs unquantifiable.โ
John: Who do you think between Malcolm and Alan Partridge is more morally upstanding?
โThatโs interesting.โ
Benn: I was going to ask whoโd win in a fightโฆ
โWell I think Alanโs been taking some martial arts lessons. So you never know. Whereas Malcolm probably thinks he doesnโt have to practiceโits an instinct thing. So Alan might surprise him, might take him down, with a sort of wrestling move. I think Alan watches a lot of wrestling, and practices at home.โ
Benn: So weโre obviously a newspaper, a pretty rubbish one, but a newspaper nonethelessโฆ
โItโs one of the oldest and finest!โ
Benn: … but one of your The Thick Of It episodes focuses on a kind of mock Leveson inquiryโdo you think that the way in which the media presents politicians has changed?
โNo I think itโs kind of getting worse. I mean look at it now, Theresa May wonโt debate but she will go on The One Show with her husbandโthatโs the debateโthatโs the standoff: her and her husband and The One Show presenters. And Jeremy Corbynโs events are very controlled as well. So this ‘letโs ask the people’โwell, you havenโt really asked us anything yet, because youโve only invited your own members, you know. Nothing, weโve not been allowed to ask anything, and thatโs what depresses me. And yet at the same time, Iโm trying to encourage young and first-time voters to register to vote. It will only get worse, the fewer and fewer of us who vote, it will only get worseโbecause it means thereโs fewer and fewer people for politicians to be scared of you know.โ
John: Which living politician do you most admire?
โRoy Hattersley! Oh, living politician. You see I always a huge fan of Charles Kennedy, who sadly died. and you know, he was one of the only party leaders right from the word go to say no to the Iraq War, to say โNo! What are we doing! This is madnessโthis will all end in tearsโ, and he was absolutely right. All the best ones have diedโฆ Robin Cook, Mo Mowlamโwhatโs going on? [Suspiciously] Whatโs going on there?โ
John: Theyโre all dying! When you were young you harbored ambitions of becoming a Catholic priest. Where did it all go right?
โI went to university, and found that more interestingโ
John: But it could have been different!
โโฆ Could have been very different.โ
Benn: Iโve met some very funny priests [stares into the distance]
โYeah, funny โha-haโ or โฆโ
Benn: Well I went to Catholic boarding school…
With that, our time was up. Benn bottled his nightmares back up, and we were kindly, if forcibly, ushered out of the Unionโs inner rectumโI mean sanctum.