Saturday 12th July 2025
Blog Page 1005

Government report recommends Oxford to Cambridge expressway

0

The government’s Department for Transport has published a set of investigation results which explore possibilities of linking existing roads between Oxford and Cambridge via Bedford and Milton Keynes, improving journey times by up to 30 minutes.

Currently it takes on average more than two hours to reach Cambridge by car from Oxford. There is no direct train route and the only direct bus, the X5, takes nearly four hours. In March of this year, Lord Adonis, chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, received backing from the former Chancellor George Osborne for the funding to construct a direct rail line between the two cities.

The new study emphasised the value of a “knowledge economy” which is comprised of highly skilled workers who need close geographical proximity or good transport links in order to collaborate. It predicted that congestion along existing roads from Oxford to Cambridge could increase by around 40% by 2035, resulting in even longer journey times.

However, Danny Dorling, professor of human geography at the University of Oxford opposes the plans in the repot on environmental grounds, arguing instead for improved rail links. He told Cherwell, “Building more roads leads to more road congestion and more firms choosing to move freight by road rather than rail, all of which increases carbon pollution.”

“40,000 people a day drive over the green belt to Oxford. Adding more cars and lorries to that suggests a lack of imagination to me. But building more homes on the edge of Oxford so people don’t have to drive from Milton Keynes and then use the park and ride would be far better.”

He also highlighted the a problem of road protestors slowing development work, “one thing they should do if they really do plan to build link roads and widen other roads is factor in the costs of the expected road protestors. Road protestors in the 1990s made schemes such as this uneconomic. It is possible that the new generation will be far more pliant than mine was, but I would expect widespread protest on environmental grounds. The route they are suggesting lies between two of the most famous road protests in the UK.”

Bridget Fox, from the Campaign for Better Transport, criticized the plan for not properly considering the needs of cyclists and bus users. She said in a statement, “Oxford and Cambridge have pioneered transport policies based on providing alternatives to car dependency. To build new road connections drawing more traffic into the area risks undermining their achievements.”

Oxford University news and information office and the NIH Oxford-Cambridge Scholars Program have been contacted for comment.

 

Vice-Chancellor moves into Clarendon Building

1

Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor Louise Richardson has moved offices, from a Wellington Square location once described as a “concrete office block that would look more at home in Cold War East Berlin” to Broad Street’s Clarendon Building. University sources have suggested that the change in architectural style may have been a significant motivation for the move.

The Wellington Square offices have housed the administrative staff of Oxford University since 1974, including the Vice-Chancellor, while the Clarendon Building was constructed in 1712-13 for Oxford University Press before it moved to its present Jericho building in the 1830s.

One university source, speaking to the Oxford Mail, commented that the architecture of the Wellington Square offices may well have been a key factor in precipitating the move: “You come to Oxford thinking of the Bodleian and the Sheldonian Theatre but then visitors of the Vice-Chancellor get brought to Wellington Square, which doesn’t look good.”

A university spokesman stated that the reopening of the Weston Library last year meant that the new office space was now available.

He added, “This has allowed the small team which supports the Vice Chancellor to be co-located in the Clarendon Building. Using the traditional location as the Vice-Chancellor’s base, close to the heart of the university and many colleges, also allows the university to receive guests from around the world in a location that showcases the institution’s long history and extraordinary architectural heritage.”

A Yank in the UK

1

Editor’s note: Needless to say, our author is American. Cherwell has therefore left in all American spellings for reasons of authenticity.

The great Ernest Hemingway, a fellow Midwesterner, once wrote that you can never truly write about a place until you’ve left it. Recovering both from jet-lag and a vicious hangover, I am safely ensconced in my home country and capable of recounting the past 5 weeks studying abroad at Oxford University’s Magdalen College.

Let it be known that I was not some starry-eyed American desperate for a European adventure. I’ve travelled extensively with my father for work – tasting the shores of Europe, Asia, Central Asia, Central and South America all before hitting my country’s legal drinking age. I’m also a long-time fan of many, now somewhat out-dated, British television shows; I’ve taken full advantage of the change in my Netflix selection to binge watch Miranda, Outnumbered, Cuckoo and of course Absolutely Fabulous. I figured I knew what I was getting into before flying out of Detroit Metro Airport. The cabs would be black, the tea delicious, and the humor dry.

That being said, there are many things I’ve learned, not just about this country, but my own as well. I’ve discovered alcohol tastes a lot better this side of the Atlantic, and it took me longer than I’m comfortable admitting to understand there is no difference between “to-go” and “take away”. Here’s a list, on a spectrum starting with the obvious to the mildly surprising, about my stay abroad:

The Top 7 Things I’ve Learned About Being An American In Oxford

  1. Everyone wants to talk about how I’m American: As a University of Michigan student, I must say I suffered from lack of recognition. My accent may be obvious, but the area where I’m from less so. Few Britons seemed to have heard much about the Midwest – a large swathe of the country that lies somewhere in between Manhattan and San Francisco  – beyond knowing who Eminem is. I hadn’t had one conversation in a pub that didn’t begin with the words, “So you’re an American, are you?”, and finally understood why Brits from my area of Michigan found being singled out for their accent so singularly annoying. The reactions I’ve provoked have ranged from the cheeky (“If you’re an American, why aren’t you fat?”) to the downright insulting (“Are you voting for Donald Trump?”). This wouldn’t be a terrible conversation opener if things actually progressed beyond simply stating where I’m from before lapsing into an uncomfortable silence. Other interactions were less than kind. In line at Sainsbury’s I found myself locked in conversation with an impressively drunk man. I fixed an expression of polite disinterest that served me well until he alerted to the fact that I was, as he put it, a Yank. I was not particularly charmed but this, as it’s an antiquated pejorative. He apologized with the insistence that the term “goes over a lot better” when he uses it in the States.
  1. The City is empty in summer: Of students, at least. Tourism in Oxford puts the industry in Ann Arbor to shame. You’d be hard-pressed to find a more cosmopolitan street than Cornmarket on a Saturday morning in July. A cultural cornucopia Italians, Greeks, Spanish, Chinese and German tourists congeal on the street like plaque in the arteries of those sitting in the McDonalds, the line for which spills onto the street regardless of the hour. Beyond this, I discovered that summer college is by no means considered “real” college. Returning from a night well-spent at the Half Moon, my companions and I spotted an actual Oxford student in the wild. He asked if we were members of the British American Drama Academy, another summer group staying at our college. We replied that we were part of the academic program, which did not go over well. “You’re a Magdalen Academic?”, his voice thick with derision, “I’m a Magdalen Academic. You’re summer school scum!”
  1. It’s impossible to talk about this summer without mentioning violence: In America people are shooting each other in the chests while in England they’re shooting themselves in the foot. In the time that I’ve been here, there were three more shootings that added to this summer’s death toll, two of which added fuel to the #blacklivesmatter movement. This same movement has spread to England, and numerous protests have blocked motorways and tramlines. There have also been several attacks this summer in Germany and France, some of which have been claimed by terrorist organisations. Last week there was a stabbing in London that launched a flurry of concerned emails from parents to the program participants. Mourning international and domestic losses has increasingly become a staple of pop culture. On Bastille Day, another attack in Europe left 84 dead in Nice, and 202 injured, ten of whom were children. The Orlando nightclub shooting claimed 50 lives. During this bloody summer more deaths take place in the span of ten minutes than in military skirmishes of the past, revealing of far more than lax gun laws or mental illness.
  1. Collective memory is definitely a thing: Something I found astonishing about the English was about how often they reference their own history on a daily basis. Granted, we’re a nation that drinks from cans of beer that feature lines from the Pledge of Allegiance and lyrics from ‘The Star Spangled Banner’. Yet the English memory stretches far back and remains fixed in the minds of the present day. My university will be celebrating its bicentennial next year, and it’s quite a big deal. But upon entering the UK I was shocked by how often I’d been referred to as a colonial.
  1. People actually read in Oxford: Who knew? Whether I was walking past coffee shops or park benches, I was so distracted by how many newspapers and books that were being read that I failed to notice the people plastered to their phones and Pokémon Go. As newspapers in America downsize and re-brand to fit into an already crowded online niche, readers in England are cracking open paper — actual paper — and staying informed. As an editor of the last print paper in my city, the sight warmed my heart.
  1. The food is terrible: Sorry Oxford. Limited takeout options in the city and everything closes so damned early. This is by no means a universal rule. Notable exceptions include pizza at the White Rabbit, that Indian place across from Thirst, and select dining options along Cowley Road. I will admit the highlight of many evenings out have been the precious moments alongside the food trucks on High Street. Time will reflect that it was during my first drunken bite of chips, cheese and gravy that I saw the face of God. I found the food at Magdalen itself as inedible as at any college in the United States. Dining hall food is, as with airplane food, convenient and often the only sustainable option. (The outbreak of food poisoning that swept through the programme notwithstanding.)
  1. Stereotypes aren’t always true: I realized early on that stereotypes work both ways, and I went into my study abroad with two in mind. I was aware my American status would be a scarlet letter, and it would come attached with expectations of crudeness, unjustified self-confidence, and the ability to make a public spectacle of myself at a moment’s notice. But also the way Americans envision Britons is exported primarily from the BBC, and involves velvet-smooth accents and tailored suits. Upon arrival, I considered the many tips I’d received and emulated about blending-in and reducing my social footprint. Don’t wear clothes that are too colorful, or have words or brands; don’t be loud or disagreeable. But it would seem the train from Paddington to Oxford came with it’s own floor show in the form of a couple’s quarrel. Minutes before departure an impressive stream of swear words burst forth from a woman several rows ahead of me, the victim of which appeared to be her boyfriend. During the row, the woman to my left glanced at me and raised her eyebrows. I offered her my palm in a universal sign for, “What the hell is this person thinking?” Eventually another passenger had had enough and tactfully pointed out the presence of children aboard. It had all the effects of poking an angry bear and the woman now began to swear with the ferocity of a drunk sailor at a football match. As if to complete my metaphor, a cart of snacks was teetering down the aisle to offer refreshments for the spectators. This anecdote shines, among others, to exemplify that such people exist everywhere.

Festivals: F stands for film – Adam Green’s Aladdin at Latitude

0

While not the best film I saw during the festival Adam Green’s Aladdin captures the place of film at an arts festival at a fundamental level: showcasing unusual and creative projects in an atmosphere prepared to consider them for what they are.

Green’s take on Aladdin may be fairly described as a cross between Kanye West’s ‘runaway’ short and a nostalgia critic skit. However, it deserves more credit than just being considered an overly self-indulgent music video. Similarly its acting is deliberately stunted, rather than just bad, to add to the absurdity and even the more puerile and unfunny aspects are, while still a stumbling block, not quite ‘Freddy Got Fingered’ bad.

From considering Green’s stated inspirations of ‘The Holy Mountain’ and ‘South Park’ you get a pretty good sense of the project: an absurd drama with intriguing visuals which at least tries to comment on life, but also unfortunately with a few too manyknob jokes.

As a film that is supposed to be “like a trip” it achieves the unreality found in psychedelics better than anything else I’ve ever seen. The scenery and props being almost entirely hand painted cardboard and papier-mâché gives the impression of a more grounded reality than similarly stylized animation could. However, Green’s masterstroke for achieving the correct degree of unreality was in overdubbing every voice. It has some good points when it touches on issues of gender inequality and the fear of modern technology, but the occasional sharp observation is lost behind the myriad lines that appear to think they’re smarter than they are.

The mixed quality of commentary can likely be traced to Green’s stated process of “I get pretty stoned and then write for a couple of hours”. Unfortunately blaming a misplaced sense of one’s own intelligence on getting high makes me worry for my own output but I’m not the one to judge that.

Faults aside – Green, as primarily a musician, acted as a gateway in considering film an attraction at an event with music as the traditional focus. Once film is recognized as more of a core experience then ,I hope, that the more traditional forms of it will achieve a better audience as I was disappointed that more people didn’t see Isabelle Sieb’s superb comedic short ‘Three Women Waiting for Death’.

Too bad we can’t have our own team

0

After Tom Mitchell led Great Britain to an historic silver in the first ever men’s Rugby 7s competition at the Olympics last week, followed by Constantine Louloudis’ men’s coxless four team comfortably winning gold, Oxonians in Rio were looking at an already successful games.

Their medal haul would only increase, however, through the successes of the British coxed eight teams, with both the men’s and women’s crews containing Oxonian representation.

Firstly, last Saturday morning, the women’s eight team coxed by Zoe de Toledo earned their first medal in Olympic history, improving on their fourth-placed result at the 2015 World Championships. Though they could not quite find the performance to beat the imperious American crew, who now have claimed their third consecutive gold medal in this event, the British team battled hard to claw their way back from last place at the halfway point to finish second, even making an unlikely victory appear a possibility in the last 500m. In the end, the US pulled away to win comfortably by almost two and a half seconds, whilst Zoe de Toledo’s team managed to hold off Romania in third by 0.12 seconds.

After the success of the women’s crew, Andrew Triggs-Hodge and Paul Bennett took to the water for the men’s event. The race was one of a wholly different character, with Britain leading from start to finish to comfortably take the gold medal ahead of Germany and the Netherlands. It may not quite have been the margin of victory that the Americans enjoyed in the women’s race, but the 1.33 second gap to the silver medallists was more than enough to demonstrate the ease of victory.

Following Saturday’s victory, Triggs-Hodge also now finds himself a three-time Olympic gold medallist, having won the men’s four titles in Beijing and London.

Although the crews of the men’s and women’s coxed eight managed to add to the medal haul of Oxonians competing in Rio, the British men’s hockey team, including Dan Fox, could not quite emulate such successes.

Needing a result against Spain, and hoping that Belgium would complete a 100% record in the group stage against New Zealand, Britain could only manage a 1-1 draw against the Spanish, whilst their exit was confirmed as Belgium succumbed to a 3-1 defeat at the hands of New Zealand.

Despite the loss, Oxonians in Rio have enjoyed remarkable success. The gold and silver of the rowing competitions last Saturday added to those in the rowing and rugby, respectively, earlier last week to complete a set of medals that would place Oxford 29th in the medal table if they were their own team, trumping the likes of Denmark, South Africa, Sweden, and a host of other nations including Britain’s own neighbours Ireland.

With Britain having their most successful overseas games in their history, the Oxonian delegation can share hugely in that pride of triumph.

Oxford scientist raises money for Alzheimer’s research

0

A research assistant from Oxford University’s Translational Neuroscience and Dementia Research Group will take place in a thirty-hour endurance event early next month to raise money for investigating potential cures for Alzheimer’s disease.

Dr Francesca Nicholls, 31, is currently involved in research which transforms the hair and skin cells of Alzheimer’s sufferers into nerve cells in order to test new treatments. The research is funded by Alzheimer’s Research UK, a charity founded in 1992 by private benefactors concerned about the lack of treatment for the condition.

‘Race the Tide’ is organised by Alzheimer’s Research UK and will take place between 10th and 11th September. It is a trek along St Cuthebert’s Way, the medieval walkway running from Melrose, Scotland to the Holy Island of Lindisfarne, which is only accessible during low tide. The course is over 100km long, made more difficult by the hilly terrain. With hundreds of participants, the event is expected to raise tens of thousands to fight the degenerative disease.

Dr Nicholls’ has begun training for the hike by walking through the Oxfordshire countryside, although admits that walking for over twenty-four hours may be something of a challenge. She is hoping to exceed her initial fundraising target of £800 as local media has raised the profile of her campaign.

More than 850,000 people in the UK suffer from dementia. Although the majority of them are over 65, roughly 40,000 people under that age are victims of early onset Alzheimer’s. There is currently no cure for the disease, but drugs delaying or reducing its symptoms are being developed in increasing numbers. A greater awareness of the disease has also led to better personal care and an increased focus on counselling for suffers and their families

To donate or find out more about Dr Nicholls’ fundraising campaign visit justgiving.com/fundraising/FrancescaJNicholls.

Oxford produces more millionaires than any other UK university

2

Despite missing out to Cambridge this year in some national and international university rankings, Oxford has redeemed itself in a study that shows it produces more millionaires than any other institution in the United Kingdom.

Research by Elite Traveler magazine and wealth consultancy firm WealthInsight pegged Oxford as the fourth-largest producer of millionaire alumni in the world, behind US institutions Harvard, University of Pennsylvania and Stanford.

Cambridge and the University of London also placed inside the top 15 universities worldwide, the former just edging out the latter on the list. The United States dominated the list, with every other spot in the top ten going to universities there.

There is some question over the extent to which measures like this can be used as litmus tests for graduate earnings as a whole: the Guardian and Complete University Guide rank Cambridge higher in ‘graduate prospects’ and ‘career after six months’ respectively.

Oxford’s wealthy students have made headlines before, with 44.4 per cent of students admitted in 2015 having attended independent schools, suggesting that Oxford may already hold an advantage in wealth accumulation over other universities in Britain.

Previous research into billionaire graduates has shown similar results, with nine of the top top ten universities with the most billionaire graduates in the United States, along with Cambridge.

A report by the Intergenerational Foundation in July found that the £400,000 lifetime earnings boost often touted as the payoff for tuition fees in the British university system could only be achievable by Oxbridge graduates.

The full list of universities ranked by millionaire graduates can be found here.

Keep Off The Grass: Guide to the Libraries

0

If you like feeling smug about tourists, try the Radcliffe Camera!

Living in Oxford, you’ll quickly become accustomed to the hordes of tourists waiting to ambush you around every corner, with their matching caps and their inability to stand anywhere other than the middle of the road. But nowhere do they congregate more than underneath the Radcliffe Camera, that big round one in all the photos where historians and literature students spend most of their waking hours. No-one ever tires of brandishing their Bod card as they push through the crowds and dramatically sweep through the gate, before taking one quick look round when you get to the door to make sure they all saw you do it. Stereotypes are there to be played up to.

Radcliffe-Camera-108179

If you like industrial décor, try the Gladstone Link!

I’m glad the Gladstone Link exists. No, really. There’s nothing better than cold, dead metal, strip lighting and impassive white walls to encourage you to drill out an essay as fast as possible. Connecting the Radcliffe Camera and the Old Bodleian buildings – two of the nicest places in the city – it resembles a factory more than a library, and that’s before you even get to the dead-eyed historians inhabiting it. And then it goes down another level! And you can’t even take books out of the Lower Gladstone Link, forcing you to stay in that dungeon as it slowly drives you insane.

GL3

If you like the heat of a thousand suns, try the SSL!

Air conditioning was invented multiple decades ago, but the Social Sciences Library doesn’t seem to have caught on to that. Instead, it exists to give every student working there a chance to experience that nasty sweat you get after running for a train for several hours at a time. Middle of winter? Take some time to strip off those four extra layers you had on, and then freeze yourself as soon as you step out the building! Depths of summer? Slowly suffocate as the lack of ventilation stimulates life inside a sealed glass cube! Just another high price to pay for studying PPE.

SSL

If you like misery, try the Sackler!

God, I hate the Sackler. How can a library be this depressing? What have they done to make it like this? Maybe it’s the focus on art history, meaning everyone in there is either aggressively good-looking or a hippy. Or the fact you can’t take rucksacks larger that a sheet of A4 upstairs with you. Or perhaps the circular design, which means you can only see the desks extending around both in front and behind you, with seemingly no end. I don’t know what it is, but it’s miserable, and I would have to be dragged kicking and screaming back in there.

Sackler-Int_07G

If you like Drake’s latest album, try the Weston!

Yes, I’m totally going to make this dreadful joke, and nothing anyone says is going to stop me. The Weston’s recently-completed refurbishment has given the library a lovely reading room on the top floor, with a lovely view of the old heart of the city looking out over Broad Street. Even better, there’s a terrace on the floor above to give a completely unobstructed view of Oxford’s spires. All in all, this is the best library in Oxford if you’re a fan of great views.

Weston

If you like science, try the Radcliffe Science Library!

I’m not really sure why scientists need a library, to be honest. Isn’t science just full of formulae? Why don’t you just look them up online? If I was a scientist, with future job prospects and all that jazz, I’d probably try to avoid reading books as much as possible, and do fun things like dissecting alligators or building jet planes. I’ve heard that both of those things definitely happen, although I also hear that designing bridges is getting a bit tiring for the engineers and they’d like to move on to something more fun, like light switches.

radcliffe-science-library-3

Oxford comes seventh in world university rankings

1

The University of Oxford has been ranked as the seventh best university worldwide, according to the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). In the table, which was published on Monday, Oxford gained three places from last year’s performance, scoring 58.9 out of a possible 100 points.

Harvard maintained the top spot, as it has done since the ARWU’s creation in 2003. Cambridge moved up to fourth for the first time since 2009, having previously been ranked fifth. Oxford and Cambridge are, once again, the only UK universities in the top ten, whilst 15 of the top 20 universities are American.

The AWRU is also known as the Shanghai Ranking as it is produced by the Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. It focuses on research quality, using six indicators which include the number of Nobel Laureate and Field Medallist staff and alumni as well the number of articles published in the journals Nature and Science. Although AWRU has been criticised for its focus on sciences over humanities, it is still one of the most highly esteemed university rankings across the world.

Methods of ranking universities can differ considerably, with the Times Higher Education (THE) World Rankings earlier this year placing Oxford second and the California Institute of Technology first. Meanwhile, the QS World University Rankings, published by Quacquarelli Symonds, placed Cambridge second and Oxford sixth. Differences in ratings can be attributed to the different metrics used in each system. The THE chooses to focus to a greater extent on teaching, whilst QS has historically been criticised for reliance on reputation and peer review indicators.

2016 is the first year in which Chinese universities have appeared in the AWRU’s top 100. Tsinghua University was placed 58th and Peking University 71st. This is also the first year in which more than five Australian universities have been awarded top 100 places.

Oxford applications outstrip Cambridge again

0

Oxford’s applications for entry in 2016 were higher than Cambridge, with 19,124 teenagers applying compared to 16,719 for Cambridge: a difference of around 15%. In both cases, there were a record number of applicants, with a total of 35,843 prospective Oxbridge students.

Multiple explanations have been put forward for the discrepancy, including Cambridge’s more stringent A-Level requirements, with many humanities courses requiring A* grades where Oxford does not, and Oxford’s more aggressive outreach schemes.

Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at Buckingham University, stressed the role of admissions targets in increasing applications to Oxford when talking to The Daily Telegraph: “[Oxford] has taken into account contextual factors and it has reserved a number of places for students from who have been entitled to free school meals. Oxford is also encouraging people from a diversity of backgrounds to apply.”

Dr Julia Paolitto, Media Relations Manager for Oxford University, commented,“While it’s too early to be able to attribute our increase in applications to any one particular factor, we would take it as a positive sign that the increase in our outreach activity (and effective targeting of groups most under-represented at Oxford) is having an impact on our applications.”

Roughly 29,143 applicants did not secure a place this year – up by 1,044 or 4 per cent – from the 28,099 last year. This figure was a 6% rise on the 27,500 teenagers who were turned down in 2014/15.

Oxford has 3,200 places available, a fewer places than Cambridge’s 3,500 available spots.