Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 1063

Better-meta-theatre

0

Stoppard’s classic Shakespearean pastiche is a fascinating look at the essential mysteries of human existence. Delivered with both comedy and severity and theatrical in-jokes throughout, it’s the comedy of menace at its best.

What is our purpose? Are we free? Is meaningful communication possible? What does it mean to possess an ‘identity’? All these questions and more are brought to the fore in this intriguing existentialist comedy (a little oxymoronic, I know). Plot-wise, this play is, to say the least, perplexing, focusing on the lives of two side characters from Hamlet; and their attempts to work out whether he is mad or not. This plot runs concurrently to the original main plot of Hamlet, allowing for complex jokes on theatre and audience involvement (which is cleverly used throughout) and also numerous references to Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and the philosophers Sartre and Camus. These jokes then tie back into the original thematic content – one of the players from the original Hamlet appears throughout the play, once berating Rosencrantz and Guildenstern for not watching their own performance. They proceed to comment: what is it to perform without being watched? Picking up on both theatrical and philosophical concerns, then, is something that this play is about to the core.

The dialogue throughout is fast paced, witty, and intricate. In one particularly notable scene, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern play a game of questions which makes them question their identity, their position and their place. The notion of whether Hamlet is in fact mad or not seems of cursory importance to the pair, as one asserts to the other he is sane, only to then re- ply later he doesn’t know. The characterisation of this lead pair is so subtly yet artfully done as to raise the question of whether they are not, in fact, flipsides of the same personality. Anger, witty sparring, humour, and a clear sense of brotherhood between the two: all give the appearance of a bizarre split personality.

The most profoundly moving moment, however, is Rosencrantz’s main speech. Commencing with what appears to be a serious reflection on death, this expectation of severity is then subverted by a joke that it is the idea of being boxed in rather than dying that scares him more. Yet then the speech mutates into an angry one on the futility of the human condition, revolting against his own mortality and sense of purposelessness. The acting made these philosophical ruminations seem all the more potent, making it transform from possibly pretentious posturings into deeply personal and universal fears about life and death. Ultimately, this play has yet another attraction to it, beyond the already impressive portrayal of a philosophically complex piece. Yes, dear reader, a certain member of the crew was heard saying in the smoking area at Cellar that this was “sort of the BNOC play for this term”. Who could resist checking out a play like that?

Interview: William Adoasi

0

Tell us a bit about your brand and what you do

Vitae London is a watch brand birthed out of London, England with a global reach. Our elegant yet simplistic watches can be worn all year round for any occasion and would suit anyone from the sophisticated city worker to the trendy hipster.

Why did you choose to name the company “vitae”?

Vitae simply means life and our vision as a brand is to create products that change lives and leave a lasting impact for generations to come. Every time a Vitae London watch is bought a child is supported through education for a year in Africa.

What was your inspirations behind the watch designs?

I’m inspired by the classic simplistic watch brands of yesteryear. I wanted to create a brand with the look and feel of these brands but at an accessible price point.

What are your plans for the company in the future?

Our immediate target for 2016 is to impact 1000 lives, the reports we hear of lives changed makes the work we do meaningful. In the future we are planning to expand our range of watches and research into other accessories.

What advice would you give someone who wanted to start a company in accessories?

The market is very saturated so make sure your product is meaningful and has a unique selling point. Researching the market and the key players is imperative.

What does a normal day look like as director/manager of a watch company?

Every single day for me is varied and unique, due to the fact we are within our first year of trading I’m having to constantly churn out new content and season specific campaigns. A lot of time is dedicated also to business development and ensuring I forge relationships with retail outlets both online and in store.

"I am back to save the universe"

0

It is hard to reconcile modern-day Radiohead with the band who marked their entrance with three vicious guitar blasts preceding the chorus of ‘Creep’ in 1992. Gone is lead singer Thom Yorke’s bleach blonde hair. Gone is the introspection. Gone, it could be argued, is the pop sensibility. But never has the ability to surprise and to subvert been stronger.

This is precisely what makes their impending return so very exciting. Unannounced artwork, in their distinctive, heavily abstract visual style, all inky blue atmosphere and soulless white figures, has made its way onto their official website. This, coupled with a spate of announcements of headline slots at festivals abroad, has signalled what we’ve known unofficially since 2014, when whispers of new studio sessions first reared their head: Radiohead is back.

But, of course, they never really left. Since their most recent album, The King of Limbs (2011), the Oxford-raised group have been individually rather busy. Thom Yorke casually formed the supergroup Atoms for Peace with some unknowns – namely Flea from Red Hot Chili Peppers and Joey Waronker of Beck and R.E.M. fame. Oh, and he also released a second solo album, Tomorrow’s Modern Boxes, in 2014. The man is unbelievably prolific.

Furthermore, multi-instrumentalist Jonny Greenwood has, through his eclectic collaborations with director Paul Thomas Anderson on The Master (2012) and Inherent Vice (2014), established himself as one of the most dynamic film composers working in Hollywood today. To cap off a trinity of creatives, drummer Phil Selway also released his second solo album in 2014, entitled Weatherhouse. Take a moment to consider that embarrassing run of releases during your next essay crisis.

Then there’s the issue of a small indie film named Spectre and the resulting Bond theme controversy. After they were rejected by the infinitely wise studio heads at Sony in favour of Sam Smith – because obviously the concept of Radiohead recording a Bond theme wasn’t exciting enough – the band released the rejected track for free online on December 25th 2015. Some Christmas present. But even aside from its intrinsic value, ‘Spectre’ represents an interesting musical crossroads. The heavily syncopated, electronica-drenched sound of The King of Limbs, particularly lead single ‘Lotus Flower,’ seems to have been ditched in favour of grand instrumentation and a return to more emotive and personal lyrics. Granted, this is not the first time for Radiohead to switch up its style, aesthetically moulding themselves to a film to which they have attached their music (see the impeccable ‘Exit Music (For A Film)’ which closes Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet). But the question remains: just how far does this foreshadow whatever release is forthcoming next year?

To observe Radiohead historically, each album contains traces of the next within its sonic vocabulary. OK Computer was quite a departure from its exceptional, late 90s indie boom predecessor The Bends in that it shied away from the guitar-driven indie rock of their previous fame. That, of course, led to arguably their best work, and many fans’ (this one included) favourite album, Kid A, ditching the guitars almost entirely for a more synthetic musical landscape. This development has continued similarly up until today, when their impending sound is once more up in the air.

Though in some ways, the excitement stems from escalation. To chart Radiohead’s sonic development is akin to charting the development of any given top author, or filmmaker – each album becomes a statement of intent, and between each album lies new confidence, experiments and genres, which is precisely what makes them so immediate, and so wonderfully relished in the annals of indie rock.

For Radiohead to produce yet another LP which reaches the band’s impenetrably high standards seems impossible. But to quote the band themselves, “You can try the best you can / the best you can is good enough.” Go on, lads.

Chez Chaz: dairy-free risotto

0

I’ll let you in on a secret: I hate cheese. So, I often spend time trying to find ways of avoiding it. Risottos are renowned for their creaminess, but if you cook the rice right, you can achieve a texture that is just as silky and possibly more comforting than you get by adding dairy products.

Ingredients (serves 4)

Small handful dried porcini mushrooms

1 medium onion, finely chopped

1 clove of garlic, crushed

300g risotto rice (arborio or carnaroli)

1 cup white wine

750ml-1l vegetable stock (or chicken stock if you’re not going veggie)

300g mushrooms (I’d suggest chestnut but you can also get packets of wild mushrooms in Tesco which are nicer but fancier)

1 cup frozen peas Knob of butter (optional)

Parsley ½ lemon

Method

Add the porcini mushrooms to the stock you are using so that they can hydrate and infuse. Sweat the onions in a saucepan over a medium heat. When they have softened, add the garlic and cook for two minutes. Pour in the risotto rice and stir for another two minutes before pouring in the wine. Keep stirring the rice frequently.

Once the wine has been absorbed, pour in a ladle of the stock and keep stirring. As the liquid gets absorbed, you want to add the stock back so that it never gets dry but is never too wet. Season with salt and pepper, but be careful as stock can be quite salty.

You have a few options for cooking the mushrooms: if you’re using fancy wild mushrooms, I’d suggest you cook them separately from the risotto on a high heat in a frying pan for about 3-5 minutes and add them to the risotto right at the end. Add the frozen peas towards the end of the cooking. The rice will be cooked when it still retains a little bit of bite. Stop adding stock at this point and take it off the heat. Squeeze in the lemon juice and, if you’re not going vegan, you can add in a bit of butter. Garnish with parsley and serve.

Clunch review: Trinity

0

I’m not quite sure why they feel the need to have a suited and booted maître d’ to serve a group of hung(ove)ry students. Nor do I quite understand why there are six different types of cutlery on offer to eat the 11 different main options available. I mean, having four different veggie and even two vegan options is pretty impressive, but does anyone really need beef done three different ways (stir-fried, bourguignon and chilli)? It all seems a bit decadent, ridiculous and, well, frankly excessive.

Arriving near the end of lunch, I’m told that we’ll have the dregs of this superfluous feast. I opt to go for the fish Friday special, pan-fried John Dory fillet with salsa verde. Anything which even hints of individual preparation amongst the looming deep fat fryers of a college kitchen is bound to be good.

Wrong. Firstly, whoever thought that strip of fish could be given the title of ‘fillet’ must have been either a miser or completely blind. I’m hungry. I’m grumpy. I’m a finalist in need of fodder. My friend’s pork is piled up high on his plate, and I’m left with a goldfish. Secondly, ‘pan fried’ appears to have undergone a semantic shift since I last pored lovingly over the OED. There’s enough grease in my fish that it makes Hussein’s look like a salad bar. In fact, it’s all I can taste. Vastly disappointed, I move onto the salsa verde in the hope that my taste buds will have some reprieve. Call me a pleb, the northerner that I am, but I’m pretty sure a sauce or whatever the fuck salsa verde is meant to be is not meant to taste entirely of grease and vinegar. I mean, if you’re going to have 11 main options, at least get enough capers in your sauce to make it the flavour it is supposed to be.

Dessert, however, was alright. I don’t think anyone quite knew what it was, the staff telling me they “think it might be crumble.” Gooey and oaty, it at least filled some of the vast empty void left by my miserly, and rather expensive, portion of fish. Leaving at least slightly full, I take one last look at the endless sprawl of Trinity-emblazoned crockery and hope that next week’s clunch will leave me feeling less like I’d been to a failed upmarket bistro.

Restaurant review: Taberu

0

I’ve been to Taberu before. That time, the morning after the night before shall we say, I wasn’t much in the mood for raw fish and headed straight for the vegetarian options. You can pick up some lovely avocado pieces wrapped in sushi for lunch and be done with it. Delicious, I thought. Can’t wait to go back, I thought.

The time came last week. I was going to celebrate a friend’s birthday. There were six of us there, all crammed into a tiny booth in the back corner by the kitchen door. Amazingly, every table at Taberu makes you feel as if you are the unwanted diner being shuffled ever closer to the toilet.

No matter, I thought, since the food is pretty good and not too pricey. As we chat, the waiter comes over and asks what we want. I realise I haven’t actually looked at the menu yet and so hurriedly order a pork and rice dish with a side of octopus sushi. In truth, I wanted the sushi more to gain access to the pickled ginger than anything else.

I don’t normally have a problem with slow restaurants, but this was something else. One dish arrived: the pumpkin katsu curry. Delicious, the eaters proclaimed. But we were left asunder. Then my dish came, which was a small mercy as I was about to reach across the table and demand the leftover rice from my friend. The pork managed, at one and the same time, to be tasty but more greasy than anything I have ever put in my mouth. The breadcrumb batter melted away into an oil residue. It also had the texture of a fifth cooking, which was unfortunate, but did not detract from the overall flavour.

Other dishes continued to arrive in dribs and drabs. The girls next to me realised they had ordered one too many sushi platters. It was fun. Then I looked at birthday-girl, dishless. By the time we had all finished, her first plate had arrived. My octopus is also curiously absent. In the end, the waiter comes over with a plate of avocado rolls and two octopus, declaring, “I have brought a plate for whomever ordered one.” His listless voice was mirrored in the curiously flavourless and chewy octopus, nestled so bizarrely amid someone else’s food.

The eating experience was pleasant, if you can overlook the extremely long time we spent there (two hours in total) and the unfriendly attitude of the waiters to their customers. Bringing the bill over, he gave it to me (I had not asked for it) presumably because I was the only man amongst five women. Misogyny always tops a meal off nicely. The 10 per cent obligatory service charge was the cherry on the cake after that. 

Preview: Hyperdrive (Imps)

0

Upon sitting down to a cup of tea with the director of the Imps, Adam Mastroianni, the first thing that struck me was how earnest he was in his hyperbole. He looked me straight in the eye, and declared “you have never seen anything like this before, and you may never see anything like it again.” His quite frankly alarming level of excitement about the Imps new show, Hyperdrive, I initially put down to the fact that he’s from Ohio, and like his countrymen, inevitably gets a little bit too riled up for his own good.

However, as we begin to talk about the concept behind Hyperdrive, I can’t help but feel myself succumbing to a touch of Yankee overexcitement. The basic idea behind the show is an ingenious fusion of very fiddly technology with the brute imaginative strength of the Imps for making stuff up. On the night in question, LMH’s Simpkin’s Lee theatre will be rigged up with 3 large projector screens, a smoke machine, and a drone mounted camera. With this array of tools, the Imps intend to create fake tinder accounts, spontaneously serenade people over facetime, utilise facebook and text messages to create an interactive and immersive hour of improv, that will hopefully make you think about the increasingly integrated and connected society in which we live. If this ludicrous array of gadgetry sounds exciting, then just imagine how Mastroianni feels about it – “a big kid in a sandbox full of new toys”.

The one niggle that I had at the back of my mind about this pitch was that it might be fall back on ‘let’s all have a laugh at funny old pictures on someone’s facebook whilst they squirm in their seats’. However, for the Imps, this would go completely against what improv is meant to be about – a reciprocal and constructive relationship between improvisers and their audience – nobody is going to be made a fool of, and you only have to get involved if you volunteer to.

Adam goes on to expound the values of improv, as a tool which teaches people to lower their inhibitions, be freer in their creativity, work communally together to construct something amazing. In short, to stop saying no, and start saying “yes, and?”

Mastroianni thinks that the UK is still a long way behind the US when it comes to improv – the art has yet to find a consistent audience outside of certain corners of the Fringe, and certainly hasn’t managed to break into the mainstream. The real problem with improv in Britain is that it relies on generic parody to draw crowds – ‘improv Doctor Who’ or ‘improv Downton Abbey’. However, Mastroianni thinks this infantilises UK audiences and presumes they don’t have the imagination or the enthusiasm to confront the genre on its own terms – something which he’s hoping to change.

The magic of improv for the Imps comes from the transience of it, no two improv shows will ever be alike, and everyone gets out of it just what they bring to it. As Mastroianni relates, it’s a bit like “the positive version of a car crash”, a single, fixed moment in time where normality is thrown out of the window and audience and performers are thrown together in (hopefully hilarious) bedlam. Adam leaves me asking you all to embrace a little bit of that haphazard spontaneity of the form – “this is really cool, trust us, come along”. Who knows what might happen on the night.

Hyperdrive is on at the Simpkins Lee Theatre, 11th-13th Feb, 8pm.

Don’t twist the facts: how The Guardian got it wrong

0

‘Comment is Free but Facts are Sacred’ The Guardian proclaims on its homepage. Nonetheless, facts appear to be anything but sacred when it comes to Oxbridge admissions. In her recently published article Sally Weale successfully managed to discredit The Guardian and whatever truth was left in The Guardian’s motto.

The key point of contention is Weale’s ignorant, or perhaps wilfully deceitful, use of statistics in her discussion of Oxford admissions. The title of Weale’s article proclaims ‘David Cameron’s Oxford college [Brasenose] admits fewest state schools applicants’.

Weale’s arguments is based on data taken from a report from Sutton Trust, which states that only 11 per cent of state school applicants to Brasenose win a place. This is the lowest proportion amongst any Oxbridge college. However, using this statistic to imply that Brasenose discriminates against state school applicants is entirely nonsensical. The reason Brasenose has the lowest acceptance rate for state school applicants is simply because it has the lowest acceptance rate for all applicants, with only 11 per cent of applicants, across both state and independent schools, gaining a place. Independent school applicants do have a marginally higher success rate, with 13 per cent getting a place.

On the other hand, Weale portrays Somerville as a paragon of virtue, with a 30 per cent acceptance rate for state school applicants. However, an average of 36 per cent of independent school applicants were successful in their application between 2011 and 2014. The discrepancy in the success rates between state school and independent school applicants is therefore greater at Somerville than at Brasenose. This completely contradicts Weale’s claim that Brasenose is uniquely inhospitable to state school applicants.

One has to wonder why Weale distorted the statistics to pick on Brasenose. A clue may lie in the title of Weale’s article, that refers to Brasenose as ‘David Cameron’s Oxford college’. To a cynical eye, it could appear that Weale is attempting to associate Cameron with elitism and discrimination, and paint him as a hypocrite in light of his recent challenge to Oxford University to improve its access and diversity. The article perhaps implies that Cameron deliberately chose to go to the most classist and privileged college as a result of his ingrained prejudice.

It is a shame for Weale to resort to such cheap political point scoring, particularly at a time when the Conservative government is enacting many controversial policies, such as abolishing student grants and striking sweetheart tax deals with multinational corporations. These areas are fertile ground for genuine intelligent criticism of this government and its policies, however Weale seems to only be able to strike on a much lower ground, labelling Cameron as an out-of-touch elitist.

Weale’s article smears Brasenose’s hard work. As stated by Jess Freedman, former Admission Rep of the college, “Brasenose is involved in more Access Events than any other college, has more prospective applicants visit the college on Open Days than any other college, has more students helping out with Access and Admissions than any other college and has the highest Satisfaction Rate amongst students, and that is exactly why we have the most applicants.”

She was the girl that showed my terrified self around during interviews when I applied, and made me feel welcome and comfortable in an alien environment in a daunting situation.

What hurt me personally as a Brasenose student was Weale’s comment, ‘critics say Brasenose is turning down strong state school candidates who are good enough to win places elsewhere in favour of candidates from independent schools.’ Leaving aside the mysterious identity of said critics, I have witnessed first-hand the effort and dedication of tutors in selecting the best possible applicants. Such a comment is nothing more than an attack on the professionalism of the admission tutors at Brasenose, which is something that cannot be ignored.

Nonetheless, we must not lose sight of the actual problems of access at Oxford, Cambridge and many other universities too. Independent school pupils are still greatly overrepresented in our student body; they make up 14 per cent of sixth form students but 44 per cent of students from UK schools at the University. This is unacceptable, and a complex problem that requires a wide-ranging response. Schools, the government and the universities themselves all have important roles to play in tackling the issue, and collaboration is key. What is certainly not needed is simplistic, misleading and ultimately inflammatory rhetoric from commentators such as Weale.

Clickbait: The 7 Deadly Sins of Living in Halls

0

For many of us, university is the first time we’ve ever lived away from home. It’s the first time we’re away from our families, the people who love and accept us no matter how much of a nightmare we are to live with. It’s the first time we’ve ever lived with other people, people who may not share our views vis-à-vis Iron Maiden at three A.M. To be honest, living in a new place with people we don’t know, intoxicated by the heady freedom from the rules and regulations of home is a learning-curve for us all. We were bound to make mistakes and make mistakes we did. At least, I know I’ve put my foot in it on more occasions than I’m proud of. Incidentally I’ve also plotted the deaths of many of my closest friends due to those charming little habits they all have which makes living in such close proximity to them a slow, agonising hike through the burning fields of hell. So, with that in mind and drawing on both my own faults and those of the people around me, I proudly present THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS OF LIVING IN HALLS:

ONE: Theft:

A communal fridge does not mean communal food. Look, we all understand it. You’ve stumbled in from a night at the club or a bender in the library and you really fancy those Babybels someone left in the fridge. Sure, of course you did, but the thing is so did somebody else. The owner of the aforementioned Babybels! What’s more that person paid for them and they don’t deserve it being stolen from under their very noses. Stealing someone’s food is one of the most callous things you could do. We’ve all been there, we all think we can get away with it, but we can’t. You wouldn’t steal someone’s phone or their iPad would you? Spilt milk may not be worth crying over, but stolen milk is quite another thing.

 

TWO: Bad Hygiene:

Maybe I’m a little guilty of this one, but it’s not quite what it sounds. What I mean to say is, if by some miracle somebody hasn’t stolen your milk and it’s surpassed its sell-by date, please throw it out. Please don’t leave a block of cheese congealing on the back of the top shelf. If you use the microwave and it gets messy, at least come back after you’ve eaten to clean it up. The sink is one of the best places to wash dishes; please use it! Do not leave them there in the vague hope they might spawn a new breed of life and earn you your dissertation early.

 

THREE: Noise:

You’ve got a tutorial at Nine o’clock, and you’re genuinely proud of yourself because for the first time since moving-in day you’ve gone to bed at a sensible time. You’re going to be awake, you’re going to be alert, and you’re going to be utterly on-the-money as it were. Then your neighbour comes charging up your staircase sounding like a herd of Elephants on World-Cup final day. There’s nothing worse than the steady rhythmic thumping of someone clattering about above you, it seems to reverberate through the walls! This one’s annoying for a million reasons, but it’s mostly that it’s just plain ignorant. It doesn’t take much to be just a little quieter and let everyone enjoy their night the way they want to.

 

FOUR: Music:

On the theme of noise, there’s music. This probably makes me sound really miserable and I don’t mean to say I don’t like music. Everyone likes music but the wonderful thing about it is that it’s so varied. This means that I may not appreciate a shockingly loud rendition of whichever K-Pop nonsense my neighbour has decided they need to listen to at cacophonous volume for three hours straight. Actually no, the rule applies for music I do like too. I’m not ashamed to admit I enjoy the occasional Taylor Swift song, but even she sounds awful when she bleeds through the wall, muffled and undecipherable.

 

FIVE: Marking your territory:

Everyone uses the same showers, and there’s not that many on the staircase. Admittedly, there’s always that one person with the bathroom right outside their door and I perfectly understand why they might be a tad resentful when they have to wait to use it in the morning. This is no excuse to leave their shampoos, conditioners and shower gels in the shower for the rest of us to trip over. The little town of passive aggressive reminders that this shower is close to your room is being ignored. Frankly if they’re not moved soon, I’m going to start using your shampoo and we’ll see how much you like that.

 

SIX: Taking too long in the shower:

Look we’re all waiting, and we all need a shower. None of us want to go out still smelling of last night’s takeaway or followed by that dank cloud of musk that floats around when you’ve been stuck in your room for the past three days by that troublesome problem sheet. Maybe it’s just me that whenever I have a shower I’m acutely conscious of the other people who might want to use it. Maybe it’s just me that’s developed the ever-giving skill of speed showering. Having a nice relaxing shower is a home comfort, like a full drawer of chocolate or a guaranteed lift everywhere. In halls it’s get in and get out, but if you want to sing go ahead, it brightens everyone’s day.

 

SEVEN: Moaning about living in halls:

We’re all guilty of this. It’s a natural transgression isn’t it? When you live with a small group of people the accommodation officer who barely knows you drew together, you’re going to get mad. Though life is much easier if we’re not ceaselessly ranting at each other about the little things. Bottle it all up, grin and bear it and then write a passive aggressive blog article about it instead. Trust me, it helps.

Review: What I learned from Johnny Bevan

0

Blair, Thatcher, Poll tax, political awakening, gentrification and the disillusionment which accompanies growing up; these are all themes, which made an appearance in Luke Wright’s What I Learned from Johnny Bevan at the North Wall last Friday.

This was well balanced by the occasional effortless slip into a ‘made-in-Chelsea’ styled accent of Tilly or Milly and Nick’s panic at being considered racist, just because by the time he reached university, he had only ever met two black people (an experience to which I could utterly relate, growing up in moderately rural Essex). Luke’s energetic performance was utterly transfixing and his presentation of the reality of university life powerfully accurate.

He touches on the socially promoted expectation that you will meet your friends for life at university, defining this as people that fulfil certain unachievable expectations in your head, only to realise that people everywhere are just people, and wherever you go, you will always need some football team to pretend to support. The images of 1960’s high rises towering in the background served to situate the audience in reality. These were not just comical characters of an imaginary world. The failure of Blair’s government was a miserable reality for many.

The journey of Johnny from a poetical political dreamer to a wrecked squatter, terrified by the idea of repeating the pitiful life of a previous generation, yet ultimately drawn to that fate because of political parties which had failed to listen to voices like his, was a hard hitting punch of the unfairness of life; the presentation of both Johnny’s dreams and ultimate desecration, a slap of reality for any current student and a reminder to keep firmly fixed in the ultimate weaknesses of mankind. Indeed this was no easy ride for the audience; we all left fairly beaten up. Johnny’s desperate call to Nick: “Does it own you? It owns me everyday?” paints a tragic picture of a disappointed idealist. But for such dreamers, the performance grants no clear answer, apart from a warning of overestimating the world around you.

To perform poetry sole in a number of different characters for a whole hour is an impressive feat by anyone’s standards. Luke was meticulous in this task. As he took his final bow, the lady next to me expressed surprise that anyone could have that much stamina. This genre, a hybrid of poetry and theatre, is reminiscent to some degree of the works of Shakespeare and medieval epic poems. Dynamically presented, all in iambics and with an ending as upsetting as any tragedy, Luke Wright, in view of the current political state, is a poet to watch. Indeed according to Johnny Bevan, there are only two categories: ‘shit’ or ‘proper’ – there is no middle ground. That being the case, this performance was proper.