Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 1064

Review: Noose

0

★★☆☆☆

I left this performance feeling distinctly underwhelmed and plagued by a vague feeling of just having missed the point. On reflection, whilst the overall sparseness of detail and lack of exposition was a deliberate part of the intrigue, it is safe to say that Anthony Maskell’s Noose is simply not the most exciting piece of new writing currently on the Oxford drama scene.

The premise definitely had potential: a chalk and cheese couple living in social isolation whose odd (metaphorical) dance around the eventuality of one of them committing suicide is interrupted by the arrival of a blind, American pilgrim. The cryptic dynamic between Jacques (Ali Porteous) and Seraphine (Misha Pinnington) was at first difficult to pin down, and in the end its exploration was too fleeting to really hook or challenge the audience. A production as short as this one (45 minutes at most) demands sharply crafted interaction between its central characters and this unfortunately missed the mark.

That said, both Porteous and Pinnington embodied their characters convincingly – Jacque’s erratic restlessness contrasted effectually with Seraphine’s cold stillness – although neither role offered the opportunity for particularly outstanding performance. The blind pilgrim (Josh Dolphin) who entered their world in a seemingly innocuous fashion but whose presence within it became increasingly sinister, proved to be a crucial plot device.  The drama that unfolded in the last 15 minutes was at points quite compelling and some clever staging was used in order to achieve this – for example the scene that took place in total darkness was ironically one of the most engaging. Other decisions were questionable: Pinnington interacting with her back to the audience for several minutes was somewhat frustrating and inhibited the expression of her character’s growing unease.

The nature of the play’s resolution was clear from the start, although the twist at the very end might surprise you. So is Noose worth an hour of your evening? Perhaps. If you’re in the mood for something short and a bit obscure then it’s worth considering; if however you’re searching for slightly weightier drama that involves greater investment then this is one to avoid. 

OUSU condemns Oriel College

0

The Oxford University Student Union Council voted 81-5 in favour of an emergency motion with 11 abstentions in reaction to Oriel College’s January 27 decision to keep standing its controversial statue of Cecil Rhodes.

The motion, proposed by Vice President-elect for Access and Academic Affairs Eden Bailey, states that the Council resolves “To condemn Oriel College’s failure to follow through on commitments made to students which primarily affect those in already marginalised and oppressed groups.”

It also mandates “the OUSU Sabbatical officers to inform Oriel College of this condemnation, and the reasons for it, which include that “Oriel College have shown a callous disregard for the students who were promised an opportunity to be heard”.

The motion also touched on the role of donors, stating that the council believes that “Oriel College has a duty to support the education and wellbeing of its current students first and foremost, before honouring the wishes of alumni.”

In discussion, a member from St. Antony’s College made the point that a JCR vote in favour of RMF should not be taken as a sign of support for the OUSU motion.

Oriel JCR President Kate Welsh said that she would abstain as she believed there had not been enough time to hear why Oriel made the decision that it did. A motion to move to a vote followed soon after instead of longer debate.

Eden Bailey, who proposed the motion, told Cherwell, “This is precisely the role of a Student Union, to support one another when college authorities are screwing other students over and not following through on promises they have made to them.

“If a student union does not condemn this, what does it do, other than give institutional authorities the message that they can do what they want without any regard for students?

“This incident is particularly concerning because a promise had been made to listen to students from a minority group, who habitually suffer oppression and marginalization in college and university. Of course, breaking a commitment to any students is dishonest and unfair, and therefore unacceptable.”

Pipe Dreams: Dare to Share?

0

My pidge partner never collects his post. I understand this shouldn’t feature significantly in my life. But Alan’s contempt for correspondence really grates. You see, however you approach it, Alan and I have an extremely intimate relationship. I cannot help but feel betrayed. The increasingly ostentatious stack of letters crammed into the narrow pigeonhole is toying with me. They are a constant reminder of the apathy of my non-existent penfriends. Each day a new envelope peeks an enticing corner out into the post-room. Each day the green shoots of my hope are sliced to pieces by the strimmer that is Alan’s enormous popularity. Dear Alan. Dearest darling Alan. Fuck Alan.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%12809%%[/mm-hide-text]

Maybe I’m being unfair on the old chap. He could be bed-bound by illness. He might be engaged in a race to patent a multimillion pound discovery. Perhaps he is the fictional front for a network of university fee fraudsters. Whatever – it’s because of Alan that I have become an unintentional stalker. I know what you’re thinking. Horrendous excuse mate, you can’t accidentally stalk someone. Call the cops Jimmy, we’ve got ourselves a confession. But it’s true – without conscious effort I know which societies he’s part of, who he banks with, where he lives, the names of his family and friends, and which groceries he buys. That last one isn’t true. But it could have been if I’d opened the Tesco coupons. His unread Christmas cards haunt my dreams.

Alan got me thinking. This whole sharing thing isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. In fact, I think teaching a small child to share is morally wrong. You become the tremor behind the modern wave of unjustifiable chumminess. We must all learn to empathise, they say. Sharing is the first step towards kindness. Compromise is essential for a happy life. What they don’t tell you is how the amount of intimacy in your life will creep up and up to a perilous level. Then you realise you’ve been sharing a toothbrush for a week, you don’t know whose pants you’re wearing, and that your boundaries have gone the way of Jeremy Hunt’s credibility.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%12810%%[/mm-hide-text]

It starts with the shared kitchen. It’s not the gradual merging of utensils and equipment. That’s almost endearing. No, it’s when you see dirty washing-up adorning the sink and receive an insight into the exact contents of your neighbours’ intestines. A rummage through the fridge becomes a series of 50 year health forecasts. Steak, cheese and chocolate mousse? Good luck mate.

Don’t even mention bathrooms. There are no secrets left when you’re breathing air which is 60% human. People have been accused of cannibalism for less. I encountered a sink the other day which was blocked by pasta, washing up liquid and clumps of hair. My life flashed before my eyes. What had I done to deserve this? It was as if I had plumbed the depths of the owner’s soul, and it had been found wanting. At the very core of their being was a slimy mound of fusilli.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%12811%%[/mm-hide-text]

Noone really wants to feel like Sherlock twitching and blinking his way towards dark personal secrets. Sometimes you’ve got to grit your teeth and put up with a bit of unpleasant closeness to keep life running smoothly. But if you do decide to do intimacy, take my advice and avoid the bed. Sharing a sleeping venue is an unfathomable enigma of engineering. Formulating a mutually comfortable position requires feats of strength, flexibility and architectural ingenuity that would have won the admiration of the classical world. It’s in the name: single bed. It ain’t designed for two. Assorted limbs hang off various edges in unsightly ways. Apparently there are people who can reach orgasm purely from the feeling of damp laundry tenderly brushing against the soles of their feet.

I am not one of those people. Take my advice. Shun intimacy. Withdraw from society. Sharing is a one way street towards the abyss.

Review: Heavy Petting

0

★★★★☆

Student comedy can be notoriously hit and miss – the cliché of the profoundly unfunny and slightly self centred stand up comedian is well worn in the 21st century. Cherwell is happy to relate that this term’s Revue show is not only a rip-roaringly hilarious night out, but manages to be fresh and bold with a relatively traditional form.

Bordering on the surreal, the sketches veer (occasionally haphazardly) through a diverse and striking array of comedic targets. There is a lack of the overarching, unifying narrative that has typified some of the Revue’s more ‘concept’ comedy in recent years, but this is not detrimental to Heavy Petting as a show. The lack of blackouts – which sometimes seem to demand applause or laughter from an expectant audience – make the sketches flow together much more naturally, linked by incidental music and very earnest laughter from the crowd.

This natural or organic style of sketch comedy really leaves room for the comedians to revel in their stage presences. The regular and forced guffaws of Jack Chisnall’s comedian persona making for a consistent thread in between the sketches – occasionally breaking the fourth wall in ways that stay just on the right side of the ‘edgy’ ‘post modern’ comedic voice. Alexander Fox also manages to summon forth a bizarre but hilarious self parody – desperately seeking the friendship of (and physical intimacy with) the audience.

Its at this point that I come to something of a dilemma as a reviewer. When I review a play, I can pad out a fair proportion of my word count with a synopsis of the events of the drama. If I were to do this with Heavy Petting, I’d basically spoil the majority of the jokes – it is part of the intrinsic nature of comedy, that like a magic trick, it relies on revelation and novelty. So, look away now if you don’t want to have one of the funnier sketches spoiled.

Still here? My highlight of this show was the phenomenal scandi-noir inspired Swedish version of Skins – entitled Skieoans [sic] where a group of teenagers bickered over twiglets and their love lives – made all the funnier by the stunningly shoddy accents on show, accompanied by apologetic shrugs as various comedians careered into cockney. Other highlights included Chesca Forristal’s impeccable portrayal of an alien, and Dom O’Keefe’s plagiarist Danny Dyer (we did warn you about spoilers!).

For fear of ruining the show for people that haven’t seen in yet, no more spoilers will be aired, but we strongly urge you to get a ticket for this sharp, 60-minute foray into a return to forms (sketch) for the Revue!

Live Jazz at the Mad Hatter

0

In the packed Mad Hatter bar on Iffley Road, dim lighting and special cocktails help set the atmosphere for JazzSoc’s weekly jazz and jam evening. The young Alex Bone, first ever winner of the BBC Young Musician Jazz award two years ago, steps onto the narrow stage at the back of the room with a trio of Oxford jazzmen.

The first notes Alex blows in his saxophone are already enough to tell that the Royal Academy of Music student is at least as talented as the long list of his achievements suggests. Together, the quartet play a young and soulful jazz with a slight experimental edge. The drums are particularly present, working with the saxophonist to produce an almost aggressively dynamic sound.

Moving on to some slower tunes, the musicians are visibly enjoying the evening as much as the small crowd that has built up in front of them. Bass and keyboard continue supporting the other two, with a neat distribution of solos. In between two songs, Alex tells us that they were only able to spend about an hour practicing together before the gig, a surprising fact considering the harmonious balance they have got going.

Breaking from speedy rhythms sending a particular electricity across the room into smooth jazz, our quartet handles a ballad with the same control. Dreamy syncopes bring back the sadly long-forgotten pleasure of entirely instrumental songs lasting longer than the conventional 3:48 minutes of a pop track.

An intro with an appreciated hint of progressive rock allows all four musicians to prove that they are perfectly at ease with a range of different styles. In this subtly varied selection of tunes, of which some, such as the final ‘Spider’, were composed by the saxophonist himself, Alex eventually picks up his soprano and the skilled drummer settles into a rhythmic counterpoint with the bouncy keyboard. Transitions from energetic and definitely modern jazz to more intimate sounds are spotless, and altogether not a single foot can be stopped from beating the measure along with the quartet.

“Chill” is the word of the evening.

A late bloomer

1

There is an unfortunate dyad in American politics: Michael Bloomberg would make an excellent president of the United States; Michael Bloomberg will not be elected president.

It’s a pity. The man maybe best equipped to serve as the nation’s chief executive has no path open to achieving the office. The former New York City mayor said it himself in 2013, “It’s just impossible. I am 100 per cent convinced that you cannot win an election [in this country] unless you are the nominee of one of the two major parties. The second thing I am convinced of is that I could not get through the primary process with either party.”

But welcome to the politics of 2016, or rather, to the post-politics America of Donald Trump. If politics is the game of power-acquisition, it presumes the existence of a rulebook. Trump’s ascendancy has thrown the rules out the window. He has dominated by saying the unsayable and challenging the unimpeachable. The billionaire from Queens speaks with the accent of everyone the establishment doesn’t allow a voice.

We are in an election cycle where the normality of text has been supplanted by the outré of subtext. Post-politics is ur-politics – the game has become art. It is a world where Bloomberg would be insane to run. He is its antithesis: calm, controlled, clear-thinking. He would also be insane not to. Sure, he would probably lose – but he might win.

His roadmap to success: exploiting the same stark schism between America’s populist country and its reactionary court that Trump and Bernie Sanders have, but to opposite effect. Bloomberg would make a candidate as purely establishment as Hillary Clinton, but with the potential to unite not fracture.

Where Clinton is burdened by scandalous allegations and oversaturation, Bloomberg offers salvation to both centre-left and centre-right. His views are non-denominational – they answer only to data, not ideology. If no-nonsense applies to anyone, it applies to Bloomberg, a man unafraid to challenge the powers that be: just ask the NRA or New York’s unions.

There is also Bloomberg’s track record. While he was mayor of New York, the city’s crime rate dropped, the 2008 financial crisis was safely weathered, and 40% of the city was rezoned. He turned a $6 billion deficit into a $3 billion surplus – through cuts as well as additional taxes. He made significant moves to improve both public health and the environment, for instance extending New York’s smoking ban to all commercial establishments and enacting a plan to protect the city’s environment even as its number of residents increases. Or maybe we should focus on his business acumen: without inheritance, he has come to be worth, by some estimates, almost $50 billion – a figure that dwarves by an order of magnitude Donald Trump’s own acquired wealth.

And because of his money, he is unencumbered and has access to every media market from coast-to-coast. He is not much known outside of New York presently; but by November, if he chooses to run, the question might be how to avoid hearing his name and seeing his ads. A top advisor has told the press that he is willing to spend $1 billion to finance his campaign – my guess is that if he thought it would help him win, he would spend much more.

Bloomberg will never be able to recruit diehard supporters of either party. He is never going to siphon off votes from Trump’s voter base or Sanders’. But considerable though those demographics might be, a significant majority of the country is left for Bloomberg to tap in to.

Counterintuitively, he will have to fear-monger by raising the spectres of Trumpism and socialism (if running against Sanders). But this is the election cycle in which that rhetoric could work. Both Republican and Democratic leaders dislike Bloomberg for his heresies against their parties – his mission must be to convince them that their enmity towards each other is misplaced. What Bloomberg can argue with no little accuracy, is that the real divide is not between Republican and Democratic establishments, but between the overarching political ruling class and the angry, populist voices sweeping the hinterland.

It is my belief that most Americans fundamentally support the status quo: the system functions, albeit imperfectly, and the paradigm under which it operates – of multicultural liberal capitalism, with provisos in order to ensure smooth operation – is the one that best describes the nation’s values.

So say Bloomberg runs – well, the pundits have been wrong before, haven’t they?

Bexistentialism: HT16 3rd Week

0

It’s Saturday. Well, not right now, I know. I’m trying to set the scene here. For the purpose of this exercise, it is Saturday. I wake up, I yawn, I stretch, and I jump out of bed. “Hurrah” I cry, nervously through the morning air, as I pad to the shower, “It’s Saturday!”. To my optimistic mind that could mean only one thing. Booze, banter and debauchery.

As night falls, people collect in my room. We sit in armchairs and on beds and drink our tea-stained mixer out of tea-stained mugs. My ‘Pardee’ Spotify playlist isn’t doing much for the whole booze, banter and debauchery plan. We need a little spice.

My friend trundles off to her room to get a pack of cards. (Spicy, I know). But alas, she returns not with spice, but with dice. Technically she returns with die. But I enjoyed that little thing I just did there where I rhymed spice and dice. Sorry.

“I’ve made up a game!”, DieFriend announces, “It’s a question game!”. Five minutes later, I am not so sure it is going how she wished. I roll a six, and thus I must start the question “Would you ever” I predictably begin. The next to roll a six is DitzMate, and thus she must finish the question, “…ooh, I know!!! Touch a piece of mouldy food! Would you ever touch a piece of mouldy food?”.

We cruelly chortle. “DitzMate, mate, I don’t think you get the game. The questions have to be interesting.”

DitzMate bows her head. “That is interesting!”

We all look at her silently. “Okay, okay, I’ll make it better next time”. Someone answers the question, die are rolled. Once more I roll a six. I’m very talented at this game. “Have you ever…?”, I begin. Once more too, DitzMate rolls the second six. We look encouragingly at her. She smiles, she’s got it. She’s been thinking about this.

“Okay”, she announces, smugly, “have you ever…had an image in your head of a moose and a goose side by side?”.

I reach for my bottle of gin.

Soon we are sharpening our shapes, ready to fling them around a sweaty hired room. We arrive, and they are flung. Along with, it seems, my body. I find myself soaring sideways through the air into the boy’s toilets, by a gentleman who I once conversed with on a show I used to present. It was not a seduction attempt; he does not follow. I find myself amongst urinals, chatting with a fresher, whilst massaging my shoved shoulder, unsure of quite why I am here.

Thankfully, the night continues without being pushed through any more doors. I tire. Soon, I pull DieMate away from flirting with our aged college barman, and we head home. As I mopily hiccough, we spot a huddle of friends. It seems that a m8 has dropped someone’s keys down a drain. A wooden spoon and plate appear somehow in the hubbub, ready to measure the depth of the drain. The keys, apparently, will be found at whatever cost. This is confirmed as two people stick their arms down a drain, squelching through unidentifiable drain juice.

I tire more, and finish the walk home. The next morning, I sigh not just at my aching head. I’m growing old and boring, I think. I am becoming reliant on the soft comfort of my incredibly hard mattress.

Later, I see KeyDropper sitting in the JCR, with sleepless eyes, and a bandage covering her leg. I look down at my excellently working legs, and then back at hers. Her eyes fall on me. I try not to grin.

Oriel Provost faces further calls to resign

0

Oriel College’s Provost Moira Wallace is facing calls to resign from individuals believing she has mishandled recent events regarding the Rhodes statue.

In a letter to The Times yesterday, Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites, ex-principal of Westfield College, University of London, suggested that recent events would leave a hole in Oriel’s finances, and that Ms Wallace should step down. He wrote, “It is going to take many years of resolute leadership to fill [the financial hole] in again and thus put the College’s reputation and standing once more on secure foundations. Moira Wallace is clearly not the person to provide that leadership. She should resign forthwith.”

The Telegraph reports that the chairman of the Commons select committee on education, Neil Carmichael, has also called for Ms Wallace’s resignation. Carmiahael is quoted as saying, “I’m sympathetic to the view that Moira Wallace should consider her position. The College allowed this to spiral out of control and there should be some sense of responsibility for what has happened. They should have foreseen that this was going to become an issue, so she should certainly consider her response to this crisis.” 

Although both articles insist that the College will face financial difficulties following the withdrawal of donations, Oriel has rejected these claims. The College said in a statement, “As the College has already said, reports that it faces an operating loss are categorically untrue. It does not depend on donations to fund its operations.” In a full statement released last week, the College also denied that it was preparing to make redundancies, but The Telegraph alleges that cuts may be planned to the development team. 

Last night, Oriel JCR adjourned a motion condemning the College’s Governing Body for “failing to listen to the voices of students in relation to the issues surrounding the fate of the statue and plaque commemorating Cecil Rhodes and, in doing this, revoking the opportunity that was promised to students in the six-month listening exercise.” The JCR did pass a motion condemning Oriel Governing Body’s failure to invite the JCR President, Kate Welsh, to the secret meeting last Wednesday. The JCR also rejected a motion urging an inquiry into the leak to The Telegraph of a secret document shown to Governing. The final motion, urging the creation of a Tutor for Equalities role, was abandoned.

The Oriel Governing Body will convene again this Wednesday when they will be addressed by the JCR and MCR presidents.