Friday, May 23, 2025
Blog Page 1084

Boy meets Girl

0

Photographer: Richard Wakefield
Makeup: Brothers Oxford
Models: Hannah CM, Natalie Page
Creatives: Harry Sampson, Ella Harding, Kim Darrah

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12691%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12684%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12688%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12681%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12685%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12678%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12689%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12682%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12686%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12679%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12690%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12683%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12687%%[/mm-hide-text] 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12680%%[/mm-hide-text] 

 

Preview: Rent

0

Something I’ve heard from several people at this point is just how much time it takes to put together an Oxford Playhouse bid. Those few hours under lights representing the mere tip of the iceberg – hundreds of man hours, a cast and crew list as long as your arm. This production of Rent is no different, and as director Georgia Figgis related to me, they’ve been working on it for a suspiciously similar amount of time to the human gestation period.

When I was invited into the warmth of the Pembroke Pichette studio in a bitterly cold 0th week, the passion in the rehearsal room stood in stark contrast to the pathetic and limp wristed attempts at snow that the Oxford weather was making outside. Musicals have always, in my experience, had a curious ability to garner enormous crowds of die-hard fans in a way that ordinary plays rarely achieve. The relevant group of fans for the musical Rent have taken the curious name Rent-heads; and if their slightly dubious Wikipedia article is to believed, one so called Rent-head went to see the Broadway production 1100 times in its 12 year run (lacking citation). The passion that the Rent team bring to their production is not quite so pathological as that (possibly fictional) individual; however it does burn just as brightly.

I was treated to performances of some of the most iconic songs from Rent – the rousing anger of the title track, the hilarious faux passion of ‘Tango Maureen’, the sound and fury of ‘Take me or Leave me’ which left one of the leads remarking “I’m so sad, I’m so angry, I’m so confused.” (Annabel Mutale Reed as Joanne). This was followed by an utterly heart wrenching performance of ‘Without you’; where sublimely tender choreography coupled with the melodious voice of Eleanor Shaw (Mimi) to leave several cast members in quite earnest floods of tears.

Talking to the cast, it became clear that the reasons for this emotion are complex, but all stem from a deep love of the diversity and depth of the characters in Rent – and the way they relate to their own lives. Rent is set in the 80s in New York’s East Village, a vibrant community living in the shadow of both Reaganomics (this play has allegedly turned one of its leads from a Tory canvasser nonetheless to an out and out leftie) and the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the latter of which killed more than 0.8% of the American population in this period – primarily amongst the LGBTQ+ community in vibrant, bohemian centres such as Alphabet City, New York.

HIV and AIDS are still, sadly, incredibly stigmatised even in 2016 (see James Delingpole’s frankly abysmal opening at the Oxford Union debate last term). Everybody involved in this production of Rent is quite evidently passionate about changing that – working alongside the Terence Higgins Trust (http://www.tht.org.uk) in the rehearsal room to help dispel the paranoia, disgust and sniggering which sadly still lingers around the fatal disease. I recommend perusing the production blog (https://rentoxford.wordpress.com) – particularly ‘Isaac: Patrick’s story’ for a deeply personal and saddening account of the HIV/AIDS crisis in the US.

The really striking thing about this production and its rehearsal process, which ties so neatly into the harrowing themes it covers, was the intent of the director and the choreographer not to treat the homosexual relationships in the play as tokens, defined by their sexuality. This intent comes out loud and clear in the choreography for ‘Without you’ – the three couples each express very different emotional difficulties, but there are none of the clichés that one has come to expect from the oft nuance-less portrayals of homosexual relationships in popular culture. Choreographer Ed Addison believes there to be a “level of novelty” in representing heterosexual and homosexual couples alongside one another in dance – “same sex couples dancing, you don’t see that… ever.”

I have no doubt that there’s a very strong population of Rent-heads in Oxford who will not be missing this show (nor the Plush after party) for the world. Even if you haven’t seen this show 1100 times before, I really would recommend going to see it, not only for the music and dance, but also for a cast that truly believes in the issues they’re tackling through their art. 

Anti-RMF motion proposed at St. Anne’s

0

St. Anne’s College JCR will discuss a motion this Sunday that proposes to announce the Common Room’s opposition to the Rhodes Must Fall (RMF) campaign.

The motion resolves to, “Publicly announce [the Common Room’s] opposition to the Rhodes Must Fall campaign, and any form of politically motivated iconoclasm in the university and its constituent colleges/PPHs”; “urge Oriel College to keep the statue of Rhodes and its associated plaques in their current position”; and, “lobby other JCRs to make resolutions opposing the Rhodes Must Fall campaign”.

An email sent to the JCR encouraged those in “opposition of the motion (thus, supporting the RMF campaign)” to come to the meeting “in the interest of having a fully engaging, intellectual debate.”

Matthew Kirtley, who proposed the motion along with Henry Williams, told Cherwell, “Generally, I’m antipathic towards the pernicious identity politics and attempts at playing at intergenerational guilt which seem implicit in the Rhodes Must Fall campaign. That served as my initial motivation why I opposed RMF, and why it was so easy for me to jump on board with the motion. The rationale for the motion is that we both believe that the statue must stand pretty sincerely, and we think a lot of other people do along with us. I’d like to get those people to remember that they’re not alone in their sentiments, and they have every right to respond to the RMF campaign.

“The key principle at hand is that we don’t believe the cultural heritage of Oxford or Britain should be removed based upon our entirely contingent contemporary moral and political norms. I don’t see that the statue of Rhodes has any attached moral standing to it, other than the commemoration of his philanthropy towards Oriel and the University. It serves to acknowledge his donation, not to acknowledge his social, moral, or political views. Heritage is important as it serves to tell to us and posterity what helped influence the institutions that used to and still exist, and also tell us of the people who shaped said institutions. Who’s to say in a thousand years Rhodes will be as controversial as he is? 

“To attempt to claim that our generation alone has reached the apotheosis of moral and political thought is chauvinistic and naive. Depriving the future of the introspective value our heritage provides – such as removing the statue and whitewashing the origins of Oriel’s Rhodes Building away – to satisfy our contingent moral ideals does not strike me as right.”

Other Common Rooms have passed motions in support of RMF, including St Catherine’s JCR and MCR, Christ Church’s GCR and St Hilda’s JCR.

The Rhodes Must Fall campaign has been contacted for comment.

Mozart’s Figaro and soft-boiled eggs

0

Oxford’s 2016 New Year concert took place at the Sheldonian, with the City of Oxford Orchestra conducted by the dynamic Stephen Bell. The orchestra accompanied pianist and Cambridge alumnus Tom Poster in Beethoven’s ‘Emperor’ concerto and welcomed soprano Pamela Haye to join them for Johann Strauss II’s ‘Laughing Song’.

The overture of Mozart’s opera The Marriage of Figaro served as opening, revealing the ensemble’s balanced sound. Before leading onto an aria by the same composer, Stephen Bell shared a cooking tip with the audience, proving how wrong it is to think that classical music doesn’t have its place in the modern world.

According to the jovial conductor, the time it took to play the first piece is identical to the time required to cook a perfect soft-boiled egg. This might not initially have been what Mozart had in mind, but it was pleasant to find the atmosphere lightened by Bell’s comments in a venue marked by decades of formal Latin speeches.

Up next was a masterful interpretation of Beethoven’s ‘Emperor’ concerto. Letting go of the orchestra’s power, this piece allowed the formation to show its depth, with the supporting double bass among the string section. Ranging from candid tunes played by the piano alone to avalanches of sound, this was truly the “treat” the conductor announced it would be, especially when it came to the pianissimo phrase that Tom Poster was able to captivate the audience with.

The second part brought its traditional ‘Waltzes, Polkas and Marches’, insisting a little too strongly on the cymbals for the triumphant airs of Suppe’s ‘Light Cavalry.’ The intimate ‘Marietta’s Lied’ by Korngold seemed almost out of place among such expansive pieces, introducing melodrama and slight imprecisions before moving on to the jubilatory Viennese waltzes.

It is a common criticism of orchestral music that the same pieces, movements and concertos are performed year after year, indicating its fundamental stagnation. Strauss’ ‘Egyptian March’ as well as the inevitable ‘Blue Danube’ closing the programme answered this criticism, whilst the choice of placing Strauss II’s ‘Laughing Song’ and the “Pizzicato Polka” composed by father and son together, in between the two more famous pieces, made the end of the concert refreshing and invigorating. Most importantly it demonstrated that classical music remains innovative, and Tom Poster’s ability to underline delicate aspects of the pieces and Stephen Bell’s energy complemented the orchestra to strike an enjoyable balance between refreshing vitality and well-known tunes during this evening.

Review: Shinedown – Threat to Survival

0

★★☆☆☆

For the third time since their formation, alternative rock band Shinedown from Florida has joined the Carnival of Madness line-up, along with Black Stone Cherry and Halestorm, among others. The tour will be bringing back its fiery sets and equally fiery energy to the United Kingdom this winter, starting in Cardiff on 28 January and finishing with a show at the Manchester Arena on 6 February.

This will be an opportunity for Shinedown to convince their British fans of the merits of their fifth album Threat to Survival.

Released last September, the album marked a definite change of style that had already been announced in the previous one, Amaryllis. Instead of the heavy bass of earlier songs like ‘Sound of Madness’ and lead member Brent Smith’s rather unsophisticated but definitely headbang-worthy singing, ‘Asking for It’ – the first track of Threat to Survival – strikes as coming less from the band’s guts than from a known recipe for likeable but weaker rock songs.

Perhaps resulting from an attempt to produce more lyrical rock than the very straightforward ‘Devour,’ the chorus of ‘Asking for it’ is an example of how this album lacks the edge Shinedown was originally appreciated for. Despite this, their popular single ‘Cut the Cord’ retains some of the characteristic aggressive tone of their earlier works.

Cuts to homelessness services in Oxford

0

When Canon Bunch threatened to evict the homeless people camping in St Giles’ churchyard last year he was lambasted in the national press. What kind of a vicar, deplored the papers, could be so wantonly cruel, when St Giles was the patron saint of beggars?

The story was more complicated than would first appear. Canon Bunch told Cherwell last year that he was concerned that the homeless were sleeping in the churchyard instead of hostels, and that the Church already hosts the Gatehouse charity which provides food, shelter and support to the homeless. Bunch’s story is important to bear in mind when looking at the desperate levels of homelessness in Oxford.

Local services for the homeless have been threatened for several years. In 2010 ‘The Gap’, an organisation which gave support and advice to the homeless, shut down due to lack of funds. Countywide cuts mean that the Lucy Faithfull House will close; its residents were told to leave by January 15th, and funding for various other accommodation will cease in April next year. O’Hanlon House has been considerably restructured after staff were told their budget would be cut two years ago, only to be told this year that their budget might be further reduced, a ‘kick in the teeth’ according to fundraising officer Kaye McDougall. She fears if they are forced to cut any more, O’Hanlon will have to drop vital services like ‘Step Up,’ a campaign which helps get their clients education and employment. She stresses the importance of doing more to help in the long term, instead of just providing food and shelter.

In the wake of the last set of cuts, O’Hanlon was entirely restructured. Now clients come from all over Oxford, which puts greater pressure on their services. Before the previous cuts, a client could live for six months at O’Hanlon House, up to two years at Julian House, and a further two years at Lucy Faithful. These days, clients are allowed to stay for four weeks at O’Hanlon, and up to nine months at any other accommodation. McDougall can see the pros and cons of this new system, telling Cherwell, “For some people, this system is better; they don’t become entrenched in the hostel, unwilling to leave the community. Now we have 10-12 clients ready to move into accommodation after February 1st. Shorter stays can ensure our clients keep moving forward. But some clients have more complex needs, and in the four week limit we can’t help them.” She’s also concerned about where the clients will go once they have moved through the pathway. “There is a severe lack of affordable housing in Oxford, so we just hope this change in policy doesn’t mean that people just keep on going through the system and are never permanently rehoused,” she said.

It’s a widely-held belief that the reason Oxford’s homelessness problem is particularly severe is because its council is more generous than those in other areas. Although conmen may come to beg in Oxford because of its generous student population, the Council can only serve those with a ‘local connection’ to Oxford. This connection could be employment in the city, immediate family in the city or long-term residence. Those who cannot prove they have a local connection are provided with food and put in contact with the services in their local area. There are several deep-rooted causes of the homelessness epidemic, the most prominent being the lack of affordable housing and the high cost of living. According to McDougall, landlords are far more likely to rent to students with maintenance grants and parental support than people who work on low wages.

In 2012 the government set out to reform the benefits system, which has forced Oxford Council to reduce the level of support available in certain areas. In the past, those in need could access crisis loans for emergencies or disasters at the discretion of the council. Now, according to the Benefits Officer at O’Hanlon House, people are far more dependent on charities and food banks for these emergency situations. Likewise, community care grants were given to those who needed support to live independently, or those who had just left the care system. All this support has been axed. O’Hanlon also claims that the government has been far more stringent in implementing sanctions and suspending benefit payments in recent years to those who don’t meet requirements, such as attending mandatory appointments or medical assessments. Changes to the system mean that those who wish to claim benefit rely on Benefit Advice Centres to help them get to grips with the intricacies of the system. Most of the centres are supported by donations and grants rather than government funding, and rely heavily on volunteers.

When talking to the homeless, formerly homeless and volunteers and staff at local services, many lines of enquiry opened up that we were unable to pursue for this issue. Specifically, cuts to mental health services seem to have been an exacerbating factor.

It’s easy for students to give money to individuals. It’s harder to give up your time to volunteer. And if local services are further cut, the money to individuals. It’s harder to give up your time to volunteer. And if local services are further cut, the need for people willing to give up their time and money will be even more pressing.

 

Raw, daring, sultry: ‘Twisted R&B’

0

★★★★★

What do you get when you add 90s style pop and R&B vocals to a dance/grime/ house/dubstep club beat? In a nutshell: Kelela, or the interestingly-coined term ‘twisted R&B’. I am writing this because on no less than three occasions (three too many), I was met with silence and vacant expressions when requesting Kelela’s Cut 4 Me over music store counters. The decline of high street shops aside, thankfully the internet and a friend who owed me a birthday present came to the rescue.

Kelela has produced something so exciting and innovative that the absence of Kelela from HMV employees’ lives pains me deeply. After all, both Björk and Solange Knowles have praised this album – so a salute to those of you already Kelela clued-up.

The Guardian deemed Cut 4 Me seventh in its line-up of the best albums of 2013. Originally a mixtape, it was reissued for 2015, complete with nine new remixes which I actually think are utterly pointless. Kelela’s sound is like a remix in itself, but I suppose the nine new tracks form the deluxe edition of Cut 4 Me, and so they are the reason for the 2015 reissue and subsequently, my recent discovery of Kelela.

DJs from Fade to Mind (a label as well as movement) and the English electronic label Night Slugs teamed up with the Washington-based Kelela to produce tracks like the glorious ‘Send Me Out’, the textured ‘Guns & Synths’ and the well-known ‘Bank Head (Extended)’. In ‘Floor Show’ Kelela sings, “This tug of war is addictive somehow”, reminding me of the tension in her music, the tug between chart, pop vocals and booming dub pulses which are full of twists and turns, fighting to stray from Kelela’s powerfully anchoring falsetto.

Her sultry vocals have a magical, softening eff ect and although the rhythms aren’t always perfectly synced to the vocals, the layering of syncopated sounds and genres typifies this bold album.

Back in 2013, The Guardian applauded Kelela’s raw emotion, but I struggle to hear such feeling in the slick composure of her vocals and fairly tame lyrics. Maybe this is because I haven’t heard much else in the way of ‘twisted R&B’, which apparently can sound robotic. The track ‘A Lie’ probably exhibits the most feeling, and the opening reminds me of the heaviness yet simple sincerity of Rhye. But there’s defi nitely none of the turmoil and fervour of FKA Twigs, whom Kelela has frequently been compared to. With clocks ticking and ropes creaking in a sound that would seamlessly back a Tim Burton feature, FKA Twigs’ sound is far bittier than Kelela, and her dark, sexual themes so much more disturbing.

In this sense, Kelela is less daring, but experimental in a diff erent and more accessible way. Her EP Hallucinogen was released in October, featuring the rich and steady ‘A Message’ and my personal favourite ‘Rewind’, with the popdub hybrid or ‘twisted R&B’ now established as something of a trademark for Kelela.

Kelela’s voice is guaranteed to soothe you, with tracks such as the two interludes ‘Go All Night (Let Me Roll)’ and ‘Go All Night (Let It Burn)’ evoking the mood-music of a decadent art gallery or boutique.

You couldn’t run or dance to this album (although I can think of certain other activities that would suit) but this beautiful limbo that Kelela’s formula off ers is the basis of Cut 4 Me ’s appeal. Five stars? Why not? It’s such a new sound to me – I’m hooked, and eagerly await more from this talented artist.

Is Fashion Becoming Less Gender-Specific?

0

Fashion is one area where men and women have traditionally been kept in their boxes – menswear and womenswear are shown and discussed separately, with separate fashion events, separate aisles of shops and separate allotted items of clothing. This does not mean that our perception of the boundaries that constitute menswear and womenswear has not changed dramatically in the past, and it doesn’t mean that it won’t continue to change. 100 years ago, women wearing jeans was scandalous, and in the 50s Coco Chanel made the radical move of putting women in suits.

Now, the necessity of the strict boundaries is being questioned more generally – increasingly, men model for womenswear, women model for menswear, and trans models are gracing the runways. At the same time, menswear is playing more with classically feminine looks and vice versa. Although this is not a new idea in the fashion world, there is a certain momentum which may reflect a movement in society more generally.

A market research firm (NDP Group) recently released a report, aimed at shops and brands, called ‘Blurred Lines: How Retail Is Becoming Less Gendered, and Why You Should Care,’ which indicated that young consumers are more inclined to see gender as a spectrum and become detached from the labels ‘male’ and ‘female’.

This movement towards a more gender fluid outlook on fashion has been met by certain brands opting to provide gender-neutral items, like Nike and American Apparel. Selfridges created a pop-up department called ‘Agender’ that aimed to create a genderless shopping experience, and sold clothes which did not specify items by gender. Faye Toogood, who designed the retail space, said that Selfridges’ ambition was to “create a space where men and women could essentially come and shop together irrespective of gender, and that you would choose clothes as an individual rather than based on your gender.”

Catwalk fashion has long played with gender boundaries, but this was taken a step further when a Louis Vuitton womenswear campaign featured Jaden Smith. Smith openly ex- periments with women’s clothes – he went to prom in a dress and posted a photo to his 2.5 million Instagram followers with the caption, ‘Went to Topshop to buy some Girls Clothes, I mean ‘Clothes’”.

If placing him in a womenswear campaign was a publicity stunt, we must ask why this decision was made. Lucas Ossendrijver, creative director of Lanvin Homme, has gone as far as to say, “This isn’t about a man wearing a skirt; it’s about a changing mindset with men – their eye for fashion has changed. Men aren’t so concerned about their masculinity anymore”

OULRC ready for Henley

0

It is time for the Oxford University Lightweight Rowing Club to have a moment under the sun. For too long the younger sibling of the heavyweight men’s and women’s squads, the lightweight rowers in many respects embody the more human aspects of high-level rowing at Oxford.Whereas OUBC and OUWBC are mainly peopled with ex-Olympians, six-foot-six international postgrads and a smattering of iron-willed undergraduate scientists, the lightweight squads attracts the most dedicated college level rower who aspires to greater things.

The Oxford University Lightweight Rowing Club (OULRC) was founded in 1975, and although it is less well known than OUBC, its annual Varsity race at Henley still attracts thousands of spectators. Arranged by a Cambridge undergraduate, the first ever Lightweight Boat Race was held in 1975 at Henley, echoing the first Heavyweight Boat Race that took place at Henley in 1829.

However, OULRC has stayed loyal to Henley, where annual Varsity races are held for both the men’s and women’s lightweights in March. Whilst the Oxford women have dominated the Boat Races over the last seven years, the men have struggled, winning only two of their last seven, with an overall score of 25 to 16 in favour of the Light Blues. Both crews lost by the narrowest of margins in the 2015 race and will be hoping to take revenge on 19th March and rediscover the outstanding form that allowed it to win seven straight from 2002 to 2008.

Like most other Oxford teams, OULRC’s primary aim is to win the Boat Race, yet in recent years the club has tried to develop away from a single-event season to competing at events such as the British University Rowing Championships and attempts to qualify for the Temple Challenge cup at Henley Royal Regatta under their racing names Nepthys and Tethys.

2015 was an exciting and dramatic year for the lightweights. It saw the completion and opening in October of the long-awaited Fishlock boathouse with capacity for six VIIIs, 10 IVs and 12 coxless pairs. Shortly afterwards there was the shock exit of Bodo Schulenburg and his replacement with Mike Hill, a former coach of Pembroke’s First VIII and the Iranian national squad.

December brought Trial VIIIs at Henley, OUL’s ‘Empire’ on the Bucks station racing ‘Rebellion’ on the Berkshire station. With the crews boasting two returners apiece ,‘Rebellion’ took an early lead at a higher rate before ‘Empire’ found their rhythm. However, ‘Rebellion’ held on to cross the line half-a-length ahead with a time of 6’16.  Cambridge’s top boat put in a time of 6’08 but comparing times is hard due to changing conditions and the fact that the OUL boats started 50m further upstream than the Tabs. OUWLRC’s ‘Venus’ triumphed on the Berks station over Serena, delivering a comprehensive win in a time of 6’52”.

Over the Christmas vacation the lightweight women headed to Spain for a warm-weather training camp whilst the men spent 10 days in Soustons in the south of France. The lightweight squads are defi ned by their homegrown talent. About two-thirds of the men’s squad this year took-up rowing at their colleges but lack the brawn, size and international level technique required for OUBC and OUWBC. OULRC bridges the gap between the superhuman performances we see on the Tideway and the chaos of the Isis on a weekday morning. As the 2016 Henley Boat Races approach, the Lightweight rowers will be pushing themselves to the limit, spurred by their desire to crush the Tabs and ensure the Henley stretch runs Dark Blue.

The Sirens are coming

0

We’re gymnasts too: just no bars, no beam, no vault.” Few lines in the history of pop culture sum up the general public’s opinion on cheerleading better than this quote from the pinnacle of all cheerleading movies. But just how close does that series come to the realities of competitive cheerleading?

When most people think of cheerleading, it’s easy to picture a lot of jumping up and down on the sideline of someone else’s game, waving pom-poms around. The reality of competitive cheerleading is that it requires intensive training and outstanding ability to perform at exceptionally high levels, and the team spends far more time competing in their own right than encouraging spectators for other games. That’s not to say the Oxford Sirens, the University’s own cheerleading squad, don’t enjoy supporting their fellow athletes or that they don’t give outstanding performances when they cheer at the rally for the Summer VIIIs race.

But it’s imperative to recognize the sheer amount of effort and talent that goes into cheerleading as a sport. The Oxford Sirens start most days with an early morning practice session, proving that you can work out during the dawning hours of the day without whining to everyone else about it (rowers, we’re looking at you.)

Training usually breaks down into conditioning, stretching, and of course, learning the routine. Conditioning is essential, as a majority of nationally competitive routines involve moderate to intense tumbling and stunting. All members of the squad need to be able to perform tumbling at a standard appropriate to the level they have been placed in. For example, Level Three, which is considered an “intermediate” level, requires knowledge of a round-off, a front and back handspring, and a back tuck, according to the British Cheerleading Association.

Furthermore, squad members also spend time performing stunts, either as part of a general routine or as part of a shortened routine consisting solely of back-to-back stunt segments (general routines also include tumbling and dance segments). Stunts vary in difficulty, with teams competing in Levels Five and Six allowed basket tosses with twisting rotations, flips, and inversions. Stunts can also be static lifts; that is, a flyer held in one position to showcase flexibility and balance (hence the stretching sessions), or pyramids with multiple flyers to form intricate structures.

Cheerleading squads are very close knit, with most members of teams citing trust – not talent, flexibility or experience – as the most essential quality for a cheerleading team to cultivate. This holds especially true for flyers, one of whom pointed out that the biggest differences between gymnastics and cheerleading, despite their numerous similarities, is the reliance on and trust that you have to place in your teammates. As a flyer, you have to trust that your bases will throw and catch you correctly, allowing you to perform the stunt safely, making it a skill ultimately far more valuable than the ability to do a layout.

So, how does all of this training pay off? During 2015, the Oxford Sirens attended three major university competitions in addition to cuppers and the Summer VIIIs performance. The cuppers competition is a good way for people unfamiliar with the sport to give it a try, while the Summer VIIIs give the Sirens a chance to showcase their skills and keep everyone excited throughout the course of the races. The highlights of the season are, of course, the competitions, with Oxford cheering at competitions hosted by Birmingham and Exeter in addition to Varsity.

The Sirens boast a wide range of levels, from beginners all the way up to advanced and experienced cheerleaders competing at Levels Five and Six. Thanks to the standard of training that the Sirens commit themselves to, Oxford generally makes entries in both the co-ed routine division and the stunting division. They have historically performed well in both of those categories,taking first place at the Spring Spirit Sensation last year.

When I asked a friend what the hardest thing about cheerleading was, her reply was almost instantaneous: “the smiling.” Having never cheered myself, I didn’t want to contradict her, but I was nevertheless incredulous, having just watched her perform 14 consecutive backflips. When I asked her to clarify this for me, she said that was exactly the point; it wasn’t the exertion that was the most challenging for her, but the pressure to make it look effortless and glamorous at the same time.

Cheerleaders have to smile while they tumble, dance, and get thrown in the air; maintain a facade of positivity even if their team is losing the match by 40+ points; and keep the spectators involved regardless of the length of the race.

Cheering is a sport that is as aesthetically demanding as it is physically, and maintaining the illusion of ease is imperative to a cheerleader’s success. The Oxford Sirens are a lot more than a way to foster enthusiasm for other sports. They’re outstandingly talented, committed, and driven athletes that have distinguished themselves on numerous occasions, and deserve plenty of support in their own right. Let’s get pumped for the 2016 season, and cheer on our cheerleaders.