Sunday 3rd August 2025
Blog Page 1090

A late bloomer

1

There is an unfortunate dyad in American politics: Michael Bloomberg would make an excellent president of the United States; Michael Bloomberg will not be elected president.

It’s a pity. The man maybe best equipped to serve as the nation’s chief executive has no path open to achieving the office. The former New York City mayor said it himself in 2013, “It’s just impossible. I am 100 per cent convinced that you cannot win an election [in this country] unless you are the nominee of one of the two major parties. The second thing I am convinced of is that I could not get through the primary process with either party.”

But welcome to the politics of 2016, or rather, to the post-politics America of Donald Trump. If politics is the game of power-acquisition, it presumes the existence of a rulebook. Trump’s ascendancy has thrown the rules out the window. He has dominated by saying the unsayable and challenging the unimpeachable. The billionaire from Queens speaks with the accent of everyone the establishment doesn’t allow a voice.

We are in an election cycle where the normality of text has been supplanted by the outré of subtext. Post-politics is ur-politics – the game has become art. It is a world where Bloomberg would be insane to run. He is its antithesis: calm, controlled, clear-thinking. He would also be insane not to. Sure, he would probably lose – but he might win.

His roadmap to success: exploiting the same stark schism between America’s populist country and its reactionary court that Trump and Bernie Sanders have, but to opposite effect. Bloomberg would make a candidate as purely establishment as Hillary Clinton, but with the potential to unite not fracture.

Where Clinton is burdened by scandalous allegations and oversaturation, Bloomberg offers salvation to both centre-left and centre-right. His views are non-denominational – they answer only to data, not ideology. If no-nonsense applies to anyone, it applies to Bloomberg, a man unafraid to challenge the powers that be: just ask the NRA or New York’s unions.

There is also Bloomberg’s track record. While he was mayor of New York, the city’s crime rate dropped, the 2008 financial crisis was safely weathered, and 40% of the city was rezoned. He turned a $6 billion deficit into a $3 billion surplus – through cuts as well as additional taxes. He made significant moves to improve both public health and the environment, for instance extending New York’s smoking ban to all commercial establishments and enacting a plan to protect the city’s environment even as its number of residents increases. Or maybe we should focus on his business acumen: without inheritance, he has come to be worth, by some estimates, almost $50 billion – a figure that dwarves by an order of magnitude Donald Trump’s own acquired wealth.

And because of his money, he is unencumbered and has access to every media market from coast-to-coast. He is not much known outside of New York presently; but by November, if he chooses to run, the question might be how to avoid hearing his name and seeing his ads. A top advisor has told the press that he is willing to spend $1 billion to finance his campaign – my guess is that if he thought it would help him win, he would spend much more.

Bloomberg will never be able to recruit diehard supporters of either party. He is never going to siphon off votes from Trump’s voter base or Sanders’. But considerable though those demographics might be, a significant majority of the country is left for Bloomberg to tap in to.

Counterintuitively, he will have to fear-monger by raising the spectres of Trumpism and socialism (if running against Sanders). But this is the election cycle in which that rhetoric could work. Both Republican and Democratic leaders dislike Bloomberg for his heresies against their parties – his mission must be to convince them that their enmity towards each other is misplaced. What Bloomberg can argue with no little accuracy, is that the real divide is not between Republican and Democratic establishments, but between the overarching political ruling class and the angry, populist voices sweeping the hinterland.

It is my belief that most Americans fundamentally support the status quo: the system functions, albeit imperfectly, and the paradigm under which it operates – of multicultural liberal capitalism, with provisos in order to ensure smooth operation – is the one that best describes the nation’s values.

So say Bloomberg runs – well, the pundits have been wrong before, haven’t they?

Bexistentialism: HT16 3rd Week

0

It’s Saturday. Well, not right now, I know. I’m trying to set the scene here. For the purpose of this exercise, it is Saturday. I wake up, I yawn, I stretch, and I jump out of bed. “Hurrah” I cry, nervously through the morning air, as I pad to the shower, “It’s Saturday!”. To my optimistic mind that could mean only one thing. Booze, banter and debauchery.

As night falls, people collect in my room. We sit in armchairs and on beds and drink our tea-stained mixer out of tea-stained mugs. My ‘Pardee’ Spotify playlist isn’t doing much for the whole booze, banter and debauchery plan. We need a little spice.

My friend trundles off to her room to get a pack of cards. (Spicy, I know). But alas, she returns not with spice, but with dice. Technically she returns with die. But I enjoyed that little thing I just did there where I rhymed spice and dice. Sorry.

“I’ve made up a game!”, DieFriend announces, “It’s a question game!”. Five minutes later, I am not so sure it is going how she wished. I roll a six, and thus I must start the question “Would you ever” I predictably begin. The next to roll a six is DitzMate, and thus she must finish the question, “…ooh, I know!!! Touch a piece of mouldy food! Would you ever touch a piece of mouldy food?”.

We cruelly chortle. “DitzMate, mate, I don’t think you get the game. The questions have to be interesting.”

DitzMate bows her head. “That is interesting!”

We all look at her silently. “Okay, okay, I’ll make it better next time”. Someone answers the question, die are rolled. Once more I roll a six. I’m very talented at this game. “Have you ever…?”, I begin. Once more too, DitzMate rolls the second six. We look encouragingly at her. She smiles, she’s got it. She’s been thinking about this.

“Okay”, she announces, smugly, “have you ever…had an image in your head of a moose and a goose side by side?”.

I reach for my bottle of gin.

Soon we are sharpening our shapes, ready to fling them around a sweaty hired room. We arrive, and they are flung. Along with, it seems, my body. I find myself soaring sideways through the air into the boy’s toilets, by a gentleman who I once conversed with on a show I used to present. It was not a seduction attempt; he does not follow. I find myself amongst urinals, chatting with a fresher, whilst massaging my shoved shoulder, unsure of quite why I am here.

Thankfully, the night continues without being pushed through any more doors. I tire. Soon, I pull DieMate away from flirting with our aged college barman, and we head home. As I mopily hiccough, we spot a huddle of friends. It seems that a m8 has dropped someone’s keys down a drain. A wooden spoon and plate appear somehow in the hubbub, ready to measure the depth of the drain. The keys, apparently, will be found at whatever cost. This is confirmed as two people stick their arms down a drain, squelching through unidentifiable drain juice.

I tire more, and finish the walk home. The next morning, I sigh not just at my aching head. I’m growing old and boring, I think. I am becoming reliant on the soft comfort of my incredibly hard mattress.

Later, I see KeyDropper sitting in the JCR, with sleepless eyes, and a bandage covering her leg. I look down at my excellently working legs, and then back at hers. Her eyes fall on me. I try not to grin.

Oriel Provost faces further calls to resign

0

Oriel College’s Provost Moira Wallace is facing calls to resign from individuals believing she has mishandled recent events regarding the Rhodes statue.

In a letter to The Times yesterday, Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites, ex-principal of Westfield College, University of London, suggested that recent events would leave a hole in Oriel’s finances, and that Ms Wallace should step down. He wrote, “It is going to take many years of resolute leadership to fill [the financial hole] in again and thus put the College’s reputation and standing once more on secure foundations. Moira Wallace is clearly not the person to provide that leadership. She should resign forthwith.”

The Telegraph reports that the chairman of the Commons select committee on education, Neil Carmichael, has also called for Ms Wallace’s resignation. Carmiahael is quoted as saying, “I’m sympathetic to the view that Moira Wallace should consider her position. The College allowed this to spiral out of control and there should be some sense of responsibility for what has happened. They should have foreseen that this was going to become an issue, so she should certainly consider her response to this crisis.” 

Although both articles insist that the College will face financial difficulties following the withdrawal of donations, Oriel has rejected these claims. The College said in a statement, “As the College has already said, reports that it faces an operating loss are categorically untrue. It does not depend on donations to fund its operations.” In a full statement released last week, the College also denied that it was preparing to make redundancies, but The Telegraph alleges that cuts may be planned to the development team. 

Last night, Oriel JCR adjourned a motion condemning the College’s Governing Body for “failing to listen to the voices of students in relation to the issues surrounding the fate of the statue and plaque commemorating Cecil Rhodes and, in doing this, revoking the opportunity that was promised to students in the six-month listening exercise.” The JCR did pass a motion condemning Oriel Governing Body’s failure to invite the JCR President, Kate Welsh, to the secret meeting last Wednesday. The JCR also rejected a motion urging an inquiry into the leak to The Telegraph of a secret document shown to Governing. The final motion, urging the creation of a Tutor for Equalities role, was abandoned.

The Oriel Governing Body will convene again this Wednesday when they will be addressed by the JCR and MCR presidents. 

Fire scare at Catz staircase

0

A fire incident broke out in a kitchen of Staircase 20 at St Catherine’s College at around 19:45 this evening.

Thick smoke was coming from the top floor of the staircase, with the situation having been subdued within five minutes of the fire service’s arrival at the scene. 

Three staircases have been fully evacuated and no one is believed to have been injured. 

JCR President Sarah White posted on the JCR’s Facebook page to explain the arrival of the three fire engines, stating that three “is a standard number to send when there are so many people living in such a small area”.

It is hoped that the residents of the staircase directly concerned will be allowed to re-enter their rooms later this evening following further ventilation of the staircase, while those in the neighbouring two were allowed back to their rooms once the fire had been extinguished. 20 undergraduates live in the staircase directly affected, while 60 live in the building as a whole.

It is thought that a broken toaster was the cause of the fire.

A second-year resident of Staircase 20 gave Cherwell the following statement: “I was in my room with some friends and we heard the fire bell go off. We took several minutes finishing our conversation as we assumed it would stop pretty soon- it usually does. Then one of my friends left the room to check the kitchen and came running back in and said ‘guys there’s literally smoke everywhere’.

“We ran into the corridor and the kitchen was full of thick smoke- you couldn’t see through it, and despite being on the other side of a glass door, smoke was already getting into the corridor. There was a very strong smell of burning. We ran outside where everyone was gathered in the car park. I ran to the Porter’s who immediately rang the fire brigade. A few minutes later they arrived and entered the building, very quickly putting out the smoke.

“I was pretty shaken as I realised that everything of value that I owned was in the room on the other side of the kitchen and that could well have set me pretty far back in my degree had the fire brigade arrived too late.”

The students affected continue to wait in the College’s JCR bar area for further instruction.

Oriel JCR condemns college administrators

0

The Oriel JCR voted on motions Monday night to condemn the college for its actions in regards to its decision to keep standing the controversial statue of Cecil Rhodes.

They were proposed by JCR president Kathryn Welsh, who said that “this is about fact that college did not listen to students” and how the administration “shut down a mode of communication”. She argued that the college going back on its promise to hold listening exercises “sets a dangerous precedent” and that the motions were not necessarily about RMF.

It was raised that students have only heard information anecdotally and Welsh added that, “College should explain why they haven’t listened to students.”

When it came to voting, the first motion was adjourned, after a vote passed by a majority not to vote on the question. The motion read, ”This JCR condemns Governing Body for failing to listen to the voices of students in relation to the issues surrounding the fate of the statue and plaque commemorating Cecil Rhodes and, in doing this, revoking the opportunity that was promised to students in the six month listening exercise.”

The next motion, however, passed with a significant majority after an amendment to replace “College” with “governing body”, but the third failed.

This second motion, in its original form, said, “This JCR condemns the College for failing to inform the JCR President that an unscheduled Governing Body meeting took place”.

Debate began on the third motion which would have similarly “condemned” the college for “the gross breach of trust that led to The Telegraph acquiring and publishing Governing Body papers”.

It did not pass, and instead of continuing with the final motion concerning the college, which called for the creation of “the position of ‘Tutor for Equality’, and [consultation of] the student body at every stage of the creation and implementation of this position,” the JCR moved on to other motions.

The Oriel JCR president has been contacted for comment.

“The FA is a load of old farts”

0

Some years ago I remember sitting in the south stand of Spurs’ White Hart Lane stadium asking, with thousands of others, for Harry to “give us a wave”, and I still can feel the joy and excitement when he complied. For all English football fans, Harry Redknapp was reminiscent of the old English gaffer, a no-nonsense bloke who inspired loyalty with a mix of ferocious discipline and unrivalled charisma. Yet when Harry walked into the Gladstone Room at the Oxford Union, there was no halo surrounding this bringer of glory to the game of football. He wouldn’t have looked out of place in the local Morrison’s near his home in Sandbanks.

It is his down to earth demeanour that first strikes me when we are introduced. We could have been two blokes introduced in the pub rather than in the grandiose surroundings of the historic Union. As we begin to chat, it becomes clear that Harry is going to be open, honest and frank about his experiences and his opinions but even so, like any good sportsman would, I decie to warm up first.

A series of quickfire questions brings some expected and unexpected results. Favourite player managed? “Gareth Bale – you never knew when he was going to do something special.” Central midfield partner for himself, Jamie (his son) or Frank Lampard (his nephew)? “Both were big talents in their day, and as much as I hate to do this, it’s got to be Frank – such a threat in front of goal”.

Turning towards his colourful career, I am hesitant to bring up his infamous BBC interview regarding his status as a ‘wheeler dealer’ for fear of being on the receiving end of a few choice expletive laden turns of phrase. Instead I decide to focus on some of his more unconventional career moves, including that infamous switch between south coast rivals Portsmouth and Southampton. Did he regret it? “No,” he replies firmly, before explaining that he doesn’t “mind the aggro”. This leads to one of the many unbelievable stories that come from having a career as long and as varied as his, where the animosity upon his return from Southampton to Portsmouth meant that he “had six SAS men on the coach!” in order to ensure security for him and his players. This story seems extraordinary for most but when put into context with some of his other tales, it’s clear that no part of Redknapp’s life is normal. He has spent a night with Eden Hazard in a Paris hotel room, and he has dashed to Heathrow to catch Amdy Faye and make him sign for Portsmouth by threatening him with a bite “where it hurts” from his beloved bulldogs. On the most difficult players to manage, he is hesitant about recounting a debate with Paulo Futre at West Ham over the number 10 shirt. Futre had worn the shirt at all his previous clubs, but was allocated number 16 at West Ham. The next day, the player arrived at training with a team of lawyers ready to negotiate a deal for the number change. Just another day at the office for Redknapp.

Moving on to his more recent experiences, I bring up the drama surrounding his exit from Tottenham and the furore over the possibility of him taking up the helm of the national team. On his exit from Tottenham, he claims that he “didn’t see it coming”. Neither, of course, did the Spurs fans who mourned the loss of one of their most successful managers. However, my fellow Spurs fans will be buoyed by the news that he believes they can go on to win the league this season. “It’s wide open,” he claims, before suggesting that any Premier League season where Leicester is sitting on top and have a “great chance” means we’re “short of a great team this year.”

On the subject of England, he says that it certainly “looked like I was going to get the England job” and even claims that if he was a betting man the odds would have been 1/10. In retrospect though, he has no regrets and isn’t even sure he was cut out for it because of the “load of old farts at the FA” and the fact that he enjoys the “day to day” aspects of managing a club. Despite all this, he holds no grudges and certainly believes England have a chance this summer with such a young and talented squad with the likes of Dele Alli, who “looks a great lad” as well as Stirling and Kane.

On wider footballing issues, Harry is optimistic when questioned about footballers coming out, saying that “things have changed for the better,” although he recognises the difficulties surrounding these issues. “It’s a difficult situation…you never know how supporters are going to react,” he muses. On money in the game, he is more damning, arguing adamantly that the funding in the UK is too top-heavy. “More needs to be put down to lower levels because facilities for kids are terrible,” he says.

Looking to the future, will English fans ever see the man they call ‘Arry back in a dugout? The man himself doubts it, saying, “I’ve had such a long spell…I started to get weary.” Opening up about his new-found relaxed life he tells me how he enjoys “doing bits with BT” and “watching Bournemouth with the grandkids.” Football is never far away, and he says that having “left school with no qualifications” he “would have been a docker,” but instead he lived for football.

He admits he still loves watching football; “It’s my life,” he says, and what a life in the beautiful game it’s been

2016: year of Virtual Reality in Sport?

0

When it comes to watching sports, nothing compares to being live at the action. Soaking in the match, one can partake in all manner of live experiences – like high-fiving the stranger next to you when things are going right, or shaking your heads in melancholic unison when the tide turns. Next would probably either be watching the game at home or at the local pub, ideally with your family and mates with a large bowl of whatever snack you can afford that weekend. And then, for most university students trapped in their rooms during term-time, you have the “I’m watching the game in my room by myself whilst crying over some microeconomics and force-feeding myself pesto pasta” scenarios – that’s honestly too painful to talk about. But what if I told you that, for a small bit of fortune, virtual reality can combine the excitement of watching the game live with the convenience of lazing in the comfort of your own house to produce the sport-watching experience of a lifetime?

As we enter 2016, sport is at the very forefront of a process that many hope will lead to the emergence of virtual reality as the premier channel for the distribution of visual content.

History was made before the beginning of the 2015-16 NBA season when the Golden State Warriors season opener against the New Orleans Pelicans became the first ever sporting event to be live streamed in virtual reality to ‘the public’, which in this case meant the few who owned a Samsung Gear VR headset. Although reports claim that the experience was actually woeful, citing blurriness and overheating of equipment as some of the main issues, it was nonetheless a significant milestone when you put it in perspective. Indeed, when the NBA announced that it was experimenting with virtual reality during the 2013-2014 season, many responded with scepticism, yet what was originally believed to be a pipe dream has actually become reality.

Concerns and criticisms of just how realistic virtual reality can really be are very much legitimate for now, but technology has a tendency to improve and there is every reason to believe that, as time goes on, we will be seeing a lot of progress with regards to quality – as NextVR co-founder D.J. Roller expressed after the Golden State match back in late October, “This is the worst VR experience you’ll ever have”. Faith in virtual reality is only boosted by the fact that VR systems from Facebook, Samsung, Sony and HTC are expected to hit the market over the next year, which at the very least is an indication that tech-specialists are expecting virtual reality to be something that people are going to enjoy over the course of the next decade or so. The situation with virtual reality is similar to that of live-streaming only a couple of years ago – I remember trying to watch a football game on my dad’s desktop all the way back in 2006 and having to put icepacks on my eyes afterwards due to the physical stress of having to focus on the Thierry Henry pixel for 90 minutes. Flash forward 10 years and live-streaming has become a common way worldwide of enjoying sports. If we were able to show the internet such patience, why can’t we do the same for virtual reality?

A much bigger objection could come from sports traditionalists, who cry that the spirit of sports is lost through technology and that a true sports fan would never be complacent enough to just watch sports from a headset. To these people, I say: boo-hoo. Firstly, no one is saying that virtual reality will replace actual reality – it’s simply providing another option for people who can’t make it to the game itself and allowing them to fully enjoy the match. Why can’t an Arsenal fan from Los Angeles or Shanghai fully submerge himself into the intensity of the game just because he or she realistically cannot make it to the Emirates? Secondly, virtual reality has the potential of not only making the match-watching experience more entertaining, but also providing a more holistic fan experience, from being at the post-match interviews or gaining an insight into the training regimen of their favourite athletes.

As Uninterrupted CEO Maverick Carter summarized, “What fans want more than anything is to be in the car with LeBron and his 13-year-old son as he gets prepared mentally for his thirteenth season.” Virtual reality can make this a legitimate possibility, and as technology continues to make the impossible look probable, sports and sports fans alike should embrace the changes that are sure to be coming

Death of the Beautiful Game

0

I have had two experiences of European football, touring Madrid and then Amsterdam. Given the questions regularly asked about the gulf between England and their continental neighbours, I was intrigued. Why does Spain have the finest passing side in world football whilst England struggles to shake its reputation for a direct and workmanlike style?

The theories are abundant, and the report produced by FA chairman Greg Dyke did little to trim the list. A popular hypothesis is the contrasting upbringing of our players and the world-beaters of traditional football power nations, like Brazil, Argentina and Spain. It is suggested that, where hardship forms an unshakeable will to improve and succeed, the same incentive is simply not present in the English game.

Whilst Luis Suárez was playing shoeless football on the streets Uruguay, England’s starlets were progressing in multi-million pound academies, chasing the promise of absurdly lucrative professional contracts. As Rio Ferdinand recently mused at the Oxford Union, how do we expect our young footballers to progress when they are given the world by 18? The days of Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes or Gary Neville having to clean Eric Cantona’s boots to earn the respect of their club’s first team and continue their progression are an increasingly distant memory.

However, the time I have spent on tour has left me believing that there is another explanation, which is equally crucial. It is no coincidence that, when facing a strong Dutch side, we were forced to play for long periods without the ball. Many of the young footballers of Holland and Spain are brought up on pristine artificial surfaces. They are taught a mentality that leaves them wanting to pass the ball, to move and to preserve possession. What’s more, they are given the facilities and the opportunities to do it. The English youth system is a stark contrast; our youngest players are rushed on to 11-a-side pitches that are too big for them.

These are the same pitches that are often slanted, uneven and overgrown. As a result, we see a style of play that is physical and direct, more from necessity than choice.

Every young player wants to win and, for too many in England, the conditions they face make a technical approach virtually impossible. It is no surprise that, even at the highest level, our national teams often lack the skills to successfully compete on the biggest stage.

By providing our young players with 3G facilities, we will exponentially improve their chances of developing the technical skills the highest level requires.

Reducing the emphasis on results and the delaying the transition to eleven-a-side will only help. Until the English game commits to such fundamental changes, I cannot envisage an end to England’s dearth of international success