Sunday 22nd June 2025
Blog Page 1135

Our crisis of home ownership

0

According to an April 2015 report of the Office for National Statistics, the average UK house price last year was £267, 000 – the average salary was around £26, 500. The pursuit of ‘affordable housing’ has become a political football because an uncontrolled housing market is denying our generation the chance to become homeowners. Here in Oxford the problem is even worse, when last year Lloyds bank found the average cost of a house in the city to be £341,000.  We need to be aware that this is an issue on our very doorstep, in what has been described as the UK’s most expensive city. The asking price of homes has risen on average 28.3 per cent since the beginning of 2008 and it is us, the property-less, that have lost out.

Central to the Tories’ May electoral victory was the belief that a Conservative government could ease the affordable housing crisis and, this week, discussion of a Housing and Planning Bill has been its first step to achieving this aim. In an echo of Thatcherite policy, the Tories see the sale of housing association property at a discounted rate as a mechanism for transferring state resources into private capital- the status of home ownership into the hands of the individual. The government further plans to use the cash raised from these sales to extend programmes for the creation of 200, 000 supposedly affordable ‘starter homes.’

One of the major problems with the act is that in the short term it threatens to leave the most vulnerable exposed more than ever to the threat of homelessness. Since the 1980s a transition from the rhetoric of ‘social housing’ to the ‘affordable homes’ we are now promised has masked a transition in the state’s role in safeguarding the property interests of the least well-off. The move from state owned ‘social housing’ to a mixed patchwork of state subsidised and controlled ‘affordable housing’ masks a dramatic decrease in available support for council tenants. Whereas before, discounts of around 50 per cent on rates were not uncommon, moves towards the sale or rent of affordable housing at a discount of 20 per cent have significantly undermined the neediest. If the government seriously considers ‘starter homes’ in London at a price of £450,000 affordable, how will it relieve the housing problems of many low-waged Britons?

The issue of where these new affordable home will be built raises more problems with the act. The Treasury’s July publication, Fixing the Foundation: creating a more prosperous nation, stressed the role of eased planning laws for the construction of affordable houses on often post-industrial brownfield sites. The sale of social housing in central locations will push poorer tenants out of our city centres. From nurses to firemen, as we threaten to drive key low wage workers out into affordable houses on the peripheral brownfield sites of our towns and cities, we threaten to dislocate vital public services. Indeed, a report published by the London Chamber of Commerce (LCC) last week mentioned explicitly that a lack of central affordable housing was threatening the city’s global economic competitiveness.

Most significantly, the proposed act goes little way to stemming the major structural issues with our property market. Only last week UBS published a report stating that London was the most overvalued property market in the world- government intervention in the release of more property onto the market is unlikely to stop this. In fact, the government’s previous Help to Buy scheme has been accused of only further fuelling the property bubble in London and the South. Rather than helping to make property more affordable, government plans to sell off existing stock without guarantee of more central affordable housing risk making the status of homeowner even less attainable.

The real victims of continued change in the property market are our communities. As much as the government may be helping those rich enough to afford participation in its schemes, lots of people our age are having to wake up to a new reality: a future without home ownership.

Whereas before housing associations helped to underpin property standards for society’s most vulnerable, the new age of ‘affordable housing’ looks to perpetuate the breakdown of socially mixed communities. At present, the property market shows no signs that it will accommodate the government’s model of change for the housing market. In cities like Oxford in particular it is becoming harder and harder for us students to imagine owning our own properties.  Within our communities, the day of the truly ‘affordable’ home seems to have passed.

Debate: Should we remember the fifth of November?

0

YES

Neha Shah

Thursday evening saw us celebrate Bonfire Night and remember the actions of Guy Fawkes, the despondent war veteran, angry about the promises the government had broken. Fawkes, along with a number of other men, was ready to take extreme action by blowing up 36 barrels of gunpowder underneath the Houses of Parliament.

The plan failed, however, and the veteran was seized and dragged before the king. He was tortured in order to produce confessions, and after a show trial, was taken to the yard outside Parliament where the politicians could all watch as the protagonists were hanged by the neck, cut down while still alive, castrated, disembowelled, and cut into pieces.

Despite injuries so bad that he could barely sign his own confession, Guy Fawkes was brave enough to jump from the scaffold before the executioner could stop him, breaking his own neck and saving himself the additional agony that the State wanted to visit upon him.

Imagine that a despondent war veteran was found today, with a bomb, underneath the Houses of Parliament. Many might identify with that veteran’s concerns. He might be frustrated that taxpayers have to pay for MPs on an annual salary of £74,000 to have an additional home, and that these MPs are receiving a ten per cent pay rise from a salary committee that they themselves set up. He might be angry that all of this happens while the government tell the terminally ill to get up and work, cut junior doctors’ basic pay and take away independent living allowances from the most vulnerable in society.

Given that we may well identify with the concerns of such an individual, why do we still celebrate the capture, torture and death of Guy Fawkes, instead of remembering his heroism, his strong anti-establishment stance and his refusal to accept the status-quo? After all, imagine what we’d do to that modern-day veteran if he was caught red-handed with his bomb under Parliament, and how it would compare to what we would do if he turned out to be a Muslim.

It is for all of these reasons, and so many more, that in today’s political climate, celebrating Guy Fawkes is arguably more relevant than ever. Although the Fifth of November was instituted as a holiday to commemorate the failure of the Gunpowder Plot and an opportunity to stir up anti-Catholic prejudices, contemporary celebrations have focused on his recast role an anti-authoritarian hero.

At the start of the twentieth century, he was the protagonist of children’s stories; by the end, he was the face of Alan Moore’s protagonist in V for Vendetta. His face has entered the popular consciousness as a prompt for questions about civil liberties and the relationship between citizen and state. Upon the release of the V for Vendetta film in 2006, David Lloyd, the artist who worked with Moore on the film, said that Fawkes “has now Moore on the film, said that Fawkes “has now become a common brand and a convenient become a common brand and a convenient placard to use in protest against tyranny.”

Two years later, in January 2008, hacktivist group Anonymous launched “Project Chanology” – a coordinated attack on the Church of Scientology’s website which they deemed to be censoring information. Rule 17 of Anonymous’s code of conduct, circulated to protesters before its “first real life public demonstration” states: “Cover your face. This will prevent your identification from videos taken by hostiles.” The Guy Fawkes mask, and its status as an icon for the law being taken into the hands of the people, provided just the consciousness” cover that Anonymous needed. Since then, the image of Guy Fawkes has been adopted by the Occupy movement, and Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has also donned a Fawkes mask. It has become a regular feature of many protests. The unbreakable spirit of Fawkes, in many regards, lives on. Surely that is worth celebrating.

But the occasion is also worth celebrating for those who do not view him as an anti-authoritarian hero, but instead as a Catholic for those who do not view him as an anti- authoritarian hero, but instead as a Catholic terrorist. Not, of course, in order to toast the death of Catholics, or even to view the burning an effigy of Guy Fawkes in good taste, but in far broader terms; it averted a national disaster.

For if the plot had succeeded in destroying Parliament, and slaughtering the entire English ruling class, the consequences for the British Isles would have been devastating, most particularly (ironically enough) for English Catholics themselves. There would probably have been civil war across England, with the Catholic minority being targeted more harshly than ever, perhaps even being exterminated as a reprisal for regicide. Even retaining the importance of the religious identity of the Guy Fawkes story, we can see an ongoing relevance, because the failure of the Catholic Church to re-establish itself in Great Britain was a small but crucial step to ending the Papacy’s status as a world power.

For me, Bonfire Night is certainly still relevant, not just in remembering the date, but what it stands for; the importance of our political processes, and the prevention of people from hijacking them through public apathy. Whilst on the rack, Fawkes famously said “a desperate disease requires a dangerous remedy,” and it is worth channeling some of this sentiment when thinking about contemporary political reform.

 

NO

We don’t really remember the fifth of November, do we? When the Comment Editors approached me with this question, I couldn’t remember the last time I’d heard it labelled ‘Guy Fawkes Night’ since I left primary school. Nowadays, it’s always ‘Bonfire Night.’ It’s the time of year when British people gather round at the back of a neighbour’s house and argue about how to light small missiles before setting fire to their garden shed. At least that’s how it was when I was younger. Even then, it was always ‘Bonfire Night,’ and often you don’t even see bonfires anymore.

For most, it used to be an occasion where we would celebrate some foiled plot to blow up Parliament, four hundred years ago. Where five-year-olds would wander the streets and knock on strangers’ doors asking for pennies in return for burning the effigy of a Catholic terrorist on a fire. Nowadays if a five-year-old wants to pretend to kill a terrorist without parental supervision, they’ve got Call of Duty; and Call of Duty won’t involve burning down half the neighbourhood with it. We have moved on from a society that celebrates mindless violence in the streets.

Instead, what’s left of ‘Guy Fawkes Night’ is bigger, and more soulless events, normally with an even larger and more soul-destroying cost. Groups of people gather at the local rugby or football club for ‘Fireworks Night’ where local ‘celebrities’ make guest appearances and local parents wish a rocket would strike them instead. There’s no link to the past anymore. As part of our growing process of disenchantment with the past the event means less and less. The displays are much more events to celebrate the lives of communities, than the history of the Gunpowder Plot. It seems Guy Fawkes has fallen out of vogue, and there doesn’t seem to be much reason to resuscitate him. It’s as if we have got to keep the festival, but not the troubling connotations that go along with it.

For starters, there are numerous other events that are hugely more important than an arguably minor plot that failed. Instead of a failure that helped provide a rallying point for anti-Catholic fervour for much of the centuries that followed, why don’t we have a national holiday like the Americans? They fire the defence budget of a small European country in the air on the 4th of July to celebrate their independence, their foundation of a nation against tyranny.

If you were to ask Britons the significance of 1st May, the Act of Union, or 15th June, the signing of Magna Carta, they’d most likely have no idea, and these dates are far more significant.

Compared to the national holidays of other countries, there is no positive message that comes from the Gunpowder Plot. The story of Guy Fawkes tells us about religious violence, our suspicion of foreigners, and outdated models of government; in short, nothing that you would want your children to aspire to.

If we really remembered what we celebrate on the fifth of November, it’d be the torture and execution of a rag-tag mob of failures. I’m not going to argue that celebrating torture and execution of traitors is wrong; many others will argue that. The Gunpowder Plot has just become rather insignificant. In the wider course of British history, Guy Fawkes and his fellow conspirators made no difference. Their attempts to overturn the Protestant establishment failed and, if anything, they made life even worse for Catholics. We shouldn’t remember the plot because, essentially, it characterised a period of religious bigotry and intolerance that we want to forget. We have moved on from persecuting Catholics – maybe we should move on from celebrating 5th November on these terms too. After all, fears of popery and wooden shoes are very 1688, and given the widespread distrust in Parliament, it wouldn’t surprise me if there’s a handful of strange people wishing the plot succeeded.

The Plot is not particularly relevant to the modern nation we live in. In an age of iPhones and the internet, the slow pace of the narrative about Guy Fawkes struggles to hold our attention. Against the threat of modern terrorism, we are desensitised to quaint tales of seventeenth-century conspiracy. The fact it has become ‘Fireworks Night’ is perhaps a testimony to that. Terrorists are such a pervasive threat nowadays, not just to our institutions, or our politicians, but to our citizens as well. However much information Theresa May might want to store about your internet habits, she’s not threatening to exhume your corpse and posthumously decapitate it for ‘liking’ Pope Francis on Facebook. We are in some ways more civilised these days. Burning a dummy ISIS leader once a year isn’t going to have much effect beyond the nation’s jingoists. We just can’t really identify with the same world view as seventeenth-century Englanders.

I really don’t want to be a killjoy, and I enjoy traditions like Guy Fawkes Night, for all their ills. But, it’s just not relevant anymore, and you can’t force it to be so. It has already morphed into something different as ‘Bonfire,’ or the somewhat anaemically titled, ‘Fireworks Night.’ Thrown into competition with Halloween, it just becomes another consumerist celebration.

Perhaps in this, it has found its niche and will continue to be an event, albeit one separated from its original meaning. Whether we should or shouldn’t, I think we will remember Guy Fawkes in the back of our minds even if his links to ‘Fireworks Night’ all but disappear completely. Nowadays, we celebrate the fifth of November more as an excuse to make loud noises, rather than to celebrate quashing treasonous papists.

TDS Shoot

0

Designers: TDS (The Design Studio Hawarden)

Photographer: Richard Wakefield

Artistic Director/Stylist: Emmanuelle Soffe

Producer: Emily Pritchard

Assisstants: Michael Lucero, Laura Grace Simpkins 

Models: Jem Bosatta, Niluka Kavanagh, Amber Barton, Katie Burns, Libby Erica, Alex Newton, Sam Treon, Aly Gilbert

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12303%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12304%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12305%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12306%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12307%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12308%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12309%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12310%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12311%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12312%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12313%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12314%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%12315%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

Patterns in the barkcloth

0

The rich tradition of barkcloth clothing stretches back to over 5,000 years ago in the islands of the Pacific. It is a highly distinctive cultural vernacular that has manifested in distinctive forms from Rapa Nui (Easter Island) to the east of New Guinea. The inner bark of the mulberry trees are painted with beautiful patterns and depictions of stories and fables unique to each island.

Exhibiting seventy-seven artifacts from the British Museum’s Oceania collection, visitors are invited to see a range of objects from barkcloth poncho-style garments known as tiputa, to dance costumes for hula groups. This is the British Museum’s first ever exhibition focusing on barkcloth and comprises objects dating from the 18th century to last year. The pieces chosen also chart the history of the peoples of the Pacific, with the nineteenth-century tiputas being adopted as a mark of conversion to Christianity popularized by missionaries because they covered the upper body. The myriad cut-out designs, ornate fringing and painted symbols springing from this new influence therefore mirror the socio-cultural climate in fascinating ways.

While the introduction of machine-made cloth to the Pacific had differing impacts to the production of barkcloth, its continued importance is validated by pieces such as the hula group clothing that dates to 2011. Such objects illustrate the continued use of barkcloth due to its strength and flexibility making it well suited to dance. The barkcloth masking traditions of Papua New Guinea also feature in the Baining mask made in the 1970s and worn in day and night dances. A stunning custom-made wedding dress created by Samoan designer Paula Chan Cheuk in 2014 incorporates plaited coconut fibre into the patterned barkcloth. Such pieces illustrate the continued centrality of barkcloth in both everyday use and ceremonial occasions. Chan Cheuk is the first to use coconut fibre in this method, furthering the innovative possibilities for the material. It is also heartening to see the British Museum funding the commission of such objects with sponsorship from the New Zealand Society UK and donations as it augments the respect, care and protection such objects require. 

During the preparation for the exhibition, curator Natasha McKinney also discovered some unexpected clues relating to the production
of the barkcloths. Two red patterned Hawaiian barkcloths dating to the late 1700s were analysed and found to have a high level of protein on their surfaces. McKinney suggests that according to contemporaneous references, this could be the use of spiders and hens eggs as a way of sealing
colours, which are preserved beautifully. In addition to mulberry, banyan and breadfruit trees are beaten to spread the fi bres which itself leaves a beautiful pattern. The cloth is then painted with a wide variety of stars, fish, figures and even seaweed impressions. Many are understood to enhance the power of the barkcloth to mediate the wearer’s transition from one life stage to another.The exhibition truly is a must-see for anyone interested in pattern-making and fabrics but, more importantly, how often does one get the chance to see such beautifully made barkcloth?

Interview: The Design Studio

0

Cherwell Fashion has been delighted and honoured to work with the up and-coming fashion label TDS (The Design Studio, Hawarden) who came especially down to Oxford to shoot with us (check out the incredible pictures in this week’s fashion photoshoot) this Autumn. TDS was launched online just over a year ago and is run by the mother-daughter duo Sally and Lettie Pattinson, based in the small village of Hawarden, just outside of Chester. Their trade-mark faux-fur bomber jackets are each uniquely designed by media graduate Lettie and textile lecturer Sally, who then skilfully hand-make every single one of them individually at their home studio. One of the first TDS label bomber jackets sold last year was purchased by model-turned actress Suki Waterhouse who eagerly turned to Instagram to boast about the latest addition to her wardrobe. Since then, their clients have included British actress Ellie Bamber, model Joanna Halpin, fashion blogger Aimee-Rose Francis and Topshop model Emma Knight. Although originally only available to purchase exclusively through Instagram, TDS have now expanded online and to stores in Belgium, including the luxurious Atelier d’Anvers, Pixie Market in New York, and soon, Selfridges in London. Their success doesn’t stop here, however. Their latest collection sold out online in less than ten minutes. Last month their Instagram account, run by intelligent and media-savvy Lettie, not only reached twenty thousand followers, but was also on the ‘Top 15 Instagrams To Follow’ worldwide. Their jackets have been featured in America’s Teen Vogue, and they received a rush of online media-attention, including with Elle and ASOS magazine; not to mention interest from Kanye West.

So who are the people behind TDS and what is their story? After twenty years of lecturing in textiles, Sally Pattinson decided to open a small TDS store in her local village Hawarden, selling an interesting array of antique objects, including satchel bags made up of old books. Not long after, Sally, along with daughter Lettie, decided to close their Hawarden store and launch their brand on Instagram. The rest, as they say, is history. Lettie, who graduated this year, and who wrote her dissertation on social media and Instagram, gives her followers a special insight into the behind-the-scenes of TDS studio. Their photos reveal glimpses of preliminary sketches, fabrics and textiles, with a beautiful array of colours on soft beige backdrops. There is a distinctly personal touch that many other Instagram fashion pages lack, as the inner workings of the studio are revealed and snapshots of both Lettie and Sally at work make the occasional appearance.

Talking with Lettie makes me realise just how well she understands the importance and the influence of Instagram on their increasing success. “Without social media we’d be nothing”, she tells me modestly. And certainly, social media may have helped them gain universal recognition at such a fast pace, but the quality and beauty of their work would certainly not have gone on unnoticed for long. “The demand in the UK is huge,” Lettie says, “We’ve recently had offers to mass-produce from China.” But the idea of mass production does not fi t well with the ethos of TDS brand, which prides itself on its unique, individual, homemade designs. I ask Lettie what she envisions for the future of TDS and she shrugs optimistically; “To keep doing what we’re doing”, she replies. She briefly mentions the possibility of moving on to other items of clothing or accessories, but admits that the success of the bomber jacket doesn’t seem to be going anywhere. “We thought the hype would die down over the summer as the weather improves. But it didn’t at all. We even had clients ordering from Dubai!”

At the start of the summer, Cherwell Fashion were in contact with TDS about the possibility of an autumn shoot in Oxford. Almost four months down the line, after intensive preparations, model selections, masses of photographer portfolios, location collaboration and two entire new ranges of jackets designed especially for the shoot, the images are finally here! TDS’ Instagram can be found at @thedesignstudiohawarden

Sharing Poetry Pie with Roger McGough

0

With praise such as “the patron saint of poetry” and “Liverpool’s poet laureate,” I was nervous about speaking with the poet Roger McGough, whose uproariously funny and moving poetry has been part of my life for as long as I can remember. This only increased when McGough told me he’d recently turned down a request to complete a festival tour to Singapore and Bahrain, because he didn’t feel like travelling. “I now get to be pickier in what I do,” he smiles, “and I need to make space for writing – I’ll publish work only when I’m ready.” But it’s alright: it seems he’s given himself time to talk to me.

Roger McGough is an integral part of Britain’s poetry scene. Moving from initial involvement in the so-called ‘Merseybeat’ to international prominence, and contributor of the famed The Mersey Sound poetry collection that propelled his work to the world’s stage, he’s done things as diverse as form part of musical trio The Scaff old to regularly hosting Radio 4’s Poetry Please programme; not to mention a plethora of highly-praised children’s and adult’s poetry collections. Whilst discussing his new collection, Poetry Pie, McGough stresses how the poetry is for both adults and children. “I’m not deliberately trying to be accessible – it’s the only way I can write.” Somewhat poetically, it
wasn’t his education but whilst as a teacher in Liverpool that McGough found his inspiration for writing: only after receiving encouragement from his pupils when he was reading his poetry did McGough began to consider becoming a poet. “I felt the need to write, so I did,” he tells me. When asked whether it took years to perfect, he informs me that there’s nothing intentionally difficult about writing poetry: “everybody should try it, it’s for everyone. So I
always write for everyone.”

Unfortunately, others haven’t always agreed with McGough. He is unhappy at being pigeonholed as an ‘upbeat poet,’ sometimes being sidelined as writing for the masses. “It’s too easy to be labelled”, McGough says. When called a ‘pop poet,’ people immediately link him to Pop Art whilst in reality, his poems can be used in any context. One only needs to look at the use of his work in his band The Scaffold to see that. “In the past being a ‘Liverpool poet’ was a put down, you were not to be trusted”, McGough says. He admits he’s enjoyed helping to put Liverpool on the map through his distinctive work, “though it always spoke for itself.” So surely that worry of being put down has diminished after all this time? The fellow of the Royal Society of Literature and President of the Poetry Society chuckles. “What people think always matters.” When we talk about the reasons for his most recent book, McGough’s voice becomes more animated.

It’s really important to keep writing for children, he says. There is worryingly little money in poetry books for publishers, especially ones for the younger generation, meaning fewer are published. McGough’s new book Poetry Pie is an attempt to rectify this, “it’s vital to inspire young poets as well as to entertain others.” McGough wants to use his poetry to make people laugh, and to reassure people around him: “poetry can be a hug.” And what about bigger global issues? McGough hasn’t written anything about Syria or migration yet. He doesn’t see it as his place to write ‘worried poems’ as he wants to be more positive about the world, a view which he suggests may stem from his strong Catholic faith. “I don’t want to spread my perception and create lots of mini McGoughs – we’re all individuals.” 

But does this mean McGough fi nds it difficult to write serious poetry? McGough has admitted it took time for this to happen, meaning his later work is more personal. Now, with age, his work can be “more focused on darkness,” spending longer on poems and wanting to keep them for longer before publishing. This style change, like his humorous, ingenious take on the everyday world, has in his words “just happened.” McGough believes our attitude to the world shapes our own unique voices, using different forms and shaping new types of poetry. This can clearly be seen in his collection Everyday Eclipses, which focuses in on everyday events. “More people should take up this outlook,” I’m told, as it forces introspection. And this focus on the details of writing is important. Despite his versatile and commanding stage presence, McGough doesn’t like looking at himself performing. The words keep him grounded in an art where the writing is always more important than the performing. “Some poets want to be songwriters. Not me.”

Despite his wide span of work, and the fame this has brought him, Roger McGough sees himself simply as a poet. “I live in a world of poetry, so I see it everywhere.” And the wry humour and sideways look on life he is known for is still as active as ever. When asked whether he wanted to be remembered as part of the trail of great poets, he responds “depending who the others are, of course!” Despite never going out searching for glory, McGough lets himself enjoy the luxuries it brings. “I get to do more work, I can pick which commissions I want. I just love the intensity of writing the poems!” This enthusiasm for creation perhaps sums up McGough’s sparkling work. He does not want to be defined as any particular type of writer just a poet that makes us smile. “Of course, I’m not looking forward to being a ‘late poet,’” he laughs. I unconsciously grin. McGough has that effect on people.

New App on the Block?

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%12300%%[/mm-hide-text]

“Money can’t buy you style but VILLOID can”

Following its launch or, rather, relaunch in September of this year, Villoid has become one of the most popular fashion apps around. It was created by Jeanette Dyhre Kvisvik, who originally released it in Norway about a year ago. She was modestly successful with it there but, in an age where the opinion of an Instagram star has a wider influence than that of a tech expert – especially when it comes to fashion, Kvisvik knew it was the power of celebrity that would really sell her product. Enter Alexa Chung: presenter, model, fashion muse, and all-round cool gal. Her involvement in the app has led to a huge increase in the number of users and has given Villoid some serious style credentials. Chung had an unsurprisingly limited involvement in the technical side of things but you can see her kooky touches all over the design. 

There are many other apps that do almost exactly the same thing as Villoid and have a very similar layout. They allow you to browse fashion goods from different brands and stylists, ‘like’ items of clothing, and buy the pieces you’ve seen. The USP of Villoid, in addition to Chung’s involvement, is the creative aspect. In a Pinterest-meets-Instagram kind of way, you can create mood boards to show your followers, who can then like or comment on what you’ve done. The good thing about this is that, not only can you see which items are trending, as you can on almost all fashion apps, but you can also see how your favourite fashionistas are wearing said items and what’s inspiring their choices. Villoid allows users to upload photos of whatever they want to a mood board so people can show what inspired them to put a certain outfit together; expect lots of movie characters, landscapes and frothy coffees. The mood board feature makes the user experience feel more like online dressing-up, trying different things together like you might at home or in a shop, and less like internet browsing.

Villoid is very user friendly, Chung’s personal brand of cool is stamped all over it (she posts a lot), and there are really interesting and inspiring boards to see. The ‘buy’ option sends you to the relevant website so you can’t actually purchase on the app like you can on the likes of The Net Set, and there are a couple of glitches with the sign-in process (I’m often asked to verify my email address), but it’s pretty fun and actually quite useful. The app is currently available on the istore and the Android version is set to be released early next year.

Review: Bob Dylan at the Royal Albert Hall

0

It should be considered as good a badge of greatness as any in the music industry to fill the Royal Albert Hall at 74 years old, and leave the punters begging for a second encore. The adoration and admiration that Bob Dylan still inspires in fans of all ages is unlike almost any other performer in the world. On Sunday night, I could see clearly why that is.

If you have heard 2015’s Bob Dylan perform, or you plan on doing so at some point, you should know that he’s a different man from 1967’s Bob Dylan. His voice has not aged well. The inimitable strains of the classic recordings are gone, replaced by something rougher and weaker. He hurries his lines, dispensing with the poise and measure that characterised his younger sound.

In spite of this, I expect the night didn’t (indeed, won’t) disappoint you. Even if his voice is a shadow of what it used to be, his choice of supporting musicians is not. While Dylan himself drew every eye, their understated class perfectly propped up his vocals.

Before the show began, not having looked up Dylan’s recent set lists, I was hoping his older material would hold its own in the running order, fearing it would lose out to his more recent work. What he delivered was a seamless blend of old and new, sliding to and fro between the decades. Highlights included ‘She Belongs to Me’ and ‘High Water (for Charley Patton)’, as well as several covers of older tracks like ‘Autumn Leaves’.

For most Dylan fans, expectations will centre on generation-defining ballads like ‘Mr Tambourine Man’ and ‘Like a Rolling Stone’, neither of which, I regret to report, were heard. However, hearing ‘Things Have Changed’ and ‘Blowin’ in the Wind’ from the mouth of their maker was exactly the quasi-religious experience I had hoped it would be. Remarkably, the size of the Royal Albert Hall detracted nothing from the intimacy of Dylan’s murmured rendition of Frank Sinatra’s ‘I’m a Fool to Want You’.

The show highlighted how Dylan, in his advanced years, has managed to remain, if not relevant, at least current. Through his so-called ‘Never Ending Tour’ (his series of nearly consecutive tours that began in 1988) and his regular new album releases, he has refused to retreat to the background. Tempest (2012) is far from the level of Bringing It All Back Home (1965), but it was still judged by Rolling Stone writers the fourth best album of 2012. It may be hard to believe, but even at 74, Dylan’s shows are worth every penny of their hefty ticket prices.

Next-gen Darwin not evolving

0

I guess you really should never meet your heroes. Darwin Deez, with his baggy jumpers, awkward dance moves and tendrils of curly hair, was my high school hero. Me and my best friend Nancy used to skip out of school early back in the heyday of 2010 to get on the London Midland and see his band play our favourite songs. We wore kooky outfits and snuck into the afterparties of Brick Lane bars. We got things signed.

Five years later, in the green room of the O2, he seemed tired, or maybe a bit sickly. Words came out slow, and his conversational skills were a little awkward. We rattled out the regular interview questions that we had scrawled down on the way there – asking about the meaning of lyrics, the feeling of fame, the artistic process. We wanted to talk to the guy who sang to us at 15 about not feeling quite right; about sitting on the ocean floor and feeling super bored.

We both realised, though, that after a nonsensical, and also rather dull, description of a memory game that he plays on his time off, and then an inexplicably long biography of an author he used to like, that Darwin Deez is actually just soulsick. He complained that he wasn’t ‘inspired’ by anything at the moment – that nothing made him feel like dancing (not even Drake’s ‘Hotline Bling’) – that girls made him bored after two years, that he was losing money on the tour and didn’t want to invest too much in it.

He was bitter about no-one buying his concept album, and resentful towards his fans for wanting indie pop bangers that they could sing along to instead of atonal abstraction. He walked out without saying goodbye, and Nancy reminded me that the last time we saw him live, he hung around for ages after his set, just perched on the edge of the stage, smiling genially and giving out hugs like they were going out of fashion.

Walking into the gig later on, we stood out like a couple of sore thumbs as we were neither 15 nor bizarre stragglers in our forties – the two demographics of which the audience seemed to consist.

Undeniably, the 15 year-olds were having a great time, while the forty-somethings were touching each other and dancing inappropriately (imagine a bear trying to shake a tree for coconuts, but the tree is a lady and this is all set to a soundtrack of ‘Radar Detector’). His trilling, plucky notes rang hollow, even though the long, self-involved guitar solos were the only times he seemed like he was enjoying himself.

So, if you want to see what the afterparty of 2010’s indie pop heyday looks like, go search out a Darwin Deez concert. He’ll still be slowly singing “I’m just wasting time away, I’m just wasting time in space”, and you’ll agree.

Oxford Lieder Festival: Singing Words

0

The 2015 Oxford Lieder Festival has drawn to a close following two busy weeks of concerts, readings, study days, masterclasses, and more. In contrast with last year’s ‘The Schubert Project’, which featured the performance of Schubert’s entire song output, this year’s festival theme was ‘Singing Words: Poets and their Songs’.

The festival’s opening concert was held in the Sheldonian Theatre, which has a much greater audience capacity and a very different acoustic to the more intimate Holywell Music Room, where the festival is based. Sarah Connolly’s voice certainly filled the theatre, as did her inimitable stage presence. The first half comprised popular Schubert songs such as ‘Die junge Nonne’, and was at once dramatic, subtle, and charming, and the post-interval selection of Wolf and Brahms prompted both tears and cheers from the audience.

In addition to the Sheldonian, concerts and events have been held in venues across Oxford, including the Jacqueline du Pré Building at St Hilda’s, the Oxford Martin School, Iffley Road’s St John the Evangelist, and even the Ashmolean and Blackwell’s. New College Ante-Chapel was used for a series of late-night concerts, providing a suitably atmospheric venue for both Imogen Cooper’s all-Chopin recital and a candlelit, haunting programme of contemporary music, including George Crumb’s Apparition, from the exciting young duo Sophie Junker and Deirdre Brenner—a suitably spooky occasion for late October.

Vaults and Gardens Café was also transformed into a late-night concert venue, taking on a warm and vibrant tavern-like feel to host the Schubert-folk-rock group The Erlkings. With drinks being served and a large student turnout in addition to the festival’s slightly older regular audience, the group’s clever and funny adaptations of Schubert favourites allowed for a fitting celebration of the festival’s opening weekend.

Nonetheless, the hub of the festival is the Holywell—a perfect venue for lieder recitals despite occasional sonic interruptions from motorbikes, bells, and people outside. The intensity of the atmosphere that grips the audience as they wait for a much-anticipated duo to take to the stage is difficult to capture in words. Perhaps the best example of this was Wolfgang Holzmair and Imogen Cooper’s programme of Clara Schumann, Frank Martin, and Robert Schumann on Friday 23rd. Holzmair and Cooper have been performing pieces such as Schumann’s Kerner-Lieder together for over 20 years, and their onstage dynamic did not disappoint. Such was the emotional intensity that it felt like the entire audience held their breath from the opening chords of ‘Stille Tränen’ until the end of a prolonged silence that followed the final song’s closure. The ovation they received was so enthusiastic that they couldn’t retire without offering two encores: first Clara Schumann’s ‘Liebst du um Schönheit’, a gently elegiac setting of Rückert’s meditation on love, and finally a favourite from Robert Schumann’s Liederkreis Op. 39, ‘Mondnacht’, to round off the evening.

Waiting for an encore is always exciting, and the choices from this year’s performers did not disappoint. Clara Schumann was also chosen for Sarah Connolly’s closing song—a gesture appreciated by those aware of the inevitable gender imbalance of the festival programme’s poets and composers (that said, the premiere of Rhian Samuel’s ‘Wildflower Songbook’ later in the festival marked another occasion to celebrate women composers). Elizabeth Watts and Julius Drake tied together a wonderful recital of Liszt and Debussy settings of Victor Hugo and Paul Verlaine with a short, intense Wagner number, and Joan Rodgers gave a charming introduction to her encore—Tchaikovsky’s ‘The Fearful Moment’—that encapsulated some of the evening’s poetic themes: love and fear.

Alongside song recitals, the festival has featured a number of chamber music concerts. The Doric Quartet returned this year to perform two staples of Romantic chamber repertoire: Schumann’s A minor quartet in the Oxford Martin School, and Brahms’s quintet with pianist Alasdair Beatson. Both of these concerts received a warm reception, and the Schumann was appreciated by a much wider audience as it was live-streamed on YouTube. 

To complement the lunchtime performances of Fauré songs that ran throughout the festival, there were also afternoon concerts of his chamber music. The C minor piano quartet was performed by an ensemble of acclaimed younger musicians: Tom Poster (piano), Magnus Johnston (violin), Timothy Ridout (viola) and Guy Johnston (cello) sustained a remarkable level of energy in a performance that brought out the exuberance of Fauré’s chamber textures. The Phoenix Piano Trio complemented their lyrical performance of Fauré’s trio with an arrangement of Janáček’s first string quartet—a version that, while performed with suitable intensity, seemed jarring in its replacement of the all-important inner string parts by piano.

The festival also runs a number of study days. This year, events were focussed variously on the interaction of music and words in song, songs in translation, and Berlioz. Highlights included a paper from Wadham fellow Philip Ross Bullock on the cultural context of Sappho’s poetry in early 20th century Russian songs, and St Catz fellow Laura Tunbridge gave an engaging and amusing critical history of song performed in translation. With a very mixed audience, the study days succeeded in providing something for everyone.

Huge thanks go to Artistic Director Sholto Kynoch, Administrator Taya Smith, the festival assistants and the rest of the Lieder Festival team for facilitating such a wonderful two weeks of music; here’s to an equally successful Schumann-themed festival next year.