Saturday 5th July 2025
Blog Page 1163

Surviving in Shanghai

0

Following perhaps my most enjoyable term at Oxford, I’ve set out on a journey 6,000 miles away on what has so far been the most enlightening trip I’ve ever had. I’ve been asked on multiple occasions why on earth did I decide to go to China when I don’t speak Chinese and do a German degree? Dear reader, I asked myself that same question when I was being corralled through customs at Pudong Airport after a twelve-hour flight from Paris, following a sign that bared the rather un-PC name ‘foreigners’.

I’m visiting Shanghai, the largest city on earth (depending how you measure it), for eight weeks on an internship at a non-for-profit organisation supporting British businesses and their development. In the two weeks I’ve been here, my time has been highly enjoyable, from the enlightening, the amusing, to the downright bizarre.

My working day consists of me getting out of bed at the insane hour of 7am in weather so humid I feel like I’m in a swimming pool all day, before climbing aboard the whirlwind of death that is the Shanghai Metro. It’s a most un-British experience. Politeness and orderliness go to shreds when you’re squeezing your way onto a subway carriage where people are so amazed to see a blonde-haired person that they take photos of you on the morning commute. I then wander outside into the stifling heat, past the red flags, and into work. To be fair, you really don’t notice that China’s not a democracy except in glimpses like how Facebook and Twitter are officially blocked, although as OUSU’s ex-Returning Officer, the lack of elections is alarming.

My workplace is a British company, conveniently located above four floors of Marks and Spencer on the longest shopping street in the world (Nanjing Road). But it remains a culture shock when you step outside at lunchtime, struggling by through pointing, hand actions and saying ‘zhege’ (this one) and ‘xiexie’ (thank you) when ordering dumplings or noodles. Luckily, the cuisine is excellent, although I’ve eaten some unusual things like turtle.

Of course, it’s not all work and no play, as I’ve discovered from exploring Shanghai from a more tourist-y perspective on the weekend. First things first, I meet up with other interns and do what many students do best: get plastered. Only here, it’s a far cry from Wahoo or Plush. We start in taxi from Pudong (I admit the name is funny) passing the skyscrapers of Lujiazui, paying only about a quid each (taxis and food are dirt cheap here) to reach a rather claustrophobic dance floor. Occasionally, I find myself getting street food after (think Hussein’s or Hassan’s, only more noodles and fewer kebabs) out on the Bund, which is modelled on Liverpool’s waterfront, at 5am in the morning.

As it’s the biggest city in the world, there’s obviously plenty to see, from the quaint and green People’s Park to the department stores on Nanjing Road, which you wander past on your way to the Bund, being offered countless “massages” on the way there. Shanghai is a very westernised place by Chinese standards so there’s very little in the way of ‘traditional’ China here, although there are glimpses of it. During rush hour when I had a half hour to spare, I walked around the Jing’an Temple, a stone’s throw from my office, where the sound of people throwing coins into wells and the smell of burning incense drowned out the morning traffic and the occasional onslaught of pollution. There’s also the Yuyuan Gardens and the Old Town, where I hear there’s a market selling crickets and other insects.

It feels extraordinary to be in such an unusual, albeit exciting country, where the cultural contrast can be daunting but if taken light-heartedly, is astounding or at least hilarious. The dreaming spires of Oxford seems so far away, as does my Yorkshire home, although my memories of the latter certainly come out in the markets here where you barter for what you want, so the strategy and stinginess come to the fore.

Indeed, I might never truly understand what actually brought me here besides my own curiosity and dreams of experiencing the world, which I’ve chased all this way. Maybe I’m sounding a little too fascinated because when all’s said and done, it’s not like I’ve discovered another planet. Yet as someone who has only been out of Europe once, I’ve never experienced anything quite like this.

However, I’ve always held that you’ve got to experience what hasn’t been experienced, which is certainly what I’m trying to do here and am doing so successfully. I’ve made plans to visit the countryside beyond Shanghai and see the city from the top of one of those skyscrapers. But for now I’m playing out the dream I set out to live on my year abroad away from Oxford, a city I already miss so much. But so far, I’m astounded by what I’ve seen.

The scandal of the Cross

0

The Pope, in his visit to Bolivia last week, received, with apparent consternation, a gift from President Evo Morales of what has been dubbed a ‘communist crucifix’, depicting Christ crucified on the hammer-and-sickle emblem. Though it is unclear whether Francis responded with the Spanish “eso no está bien” (“this is not right”) or, according to a Vatican Spokesman, “no sabía eso” (“I didn’t know that”) regarding the origins of the cross, he was evidently less-than-pleased, returning the ‘gift’ to a presidential aide within a few seconds.

The Roman Pontiff, however, was not without praise for the unabashedly socialist president, hailing his social and economic reforms as “important steps…towards including broad sectors in the country’s economic, social and political life”. Morales has previously enacted strong measures against his ‘main enemy’, the Catholic Church, formally secularising the country, removing the Bible and cross from the presidential palace, and inserting rituals to the Andean earth goddess before all official ceremonies. Yet, he has had a change of heart since the Jesuit took office. Seeing in the Pope, perhaps, a new hope of partnership in social reform, the gift was undoubtedly a political push to force an identification of interest between the Vatican and his party.

Francis has been one of the most politically active popes in recent memory. He has issued strong statements on the environment and is continually making use of his influence to criticise global capitalism and the social and economic inequality which it enables. However, as this recent scandal of the cross makes clear, Francis firmly resists any attempt to politicise his mission. Doubtless, had he been presented with a crucified Christ on any other political symbol, from a fasces to a red rose, they would likewise have been received with an “eso no está bien”.

Though he is more than comfortable praising the recent memory of his murdered fellow-Jesuit, the Bolivian Fr. Espinal- a vocal leftist activist during Suarez’s coup, considered by many as an avowed communist- Francis consistently evades political categorisation. This papacy is determined not to be recruited into any political agenda because its message is fundamentally apolitical, even if it places stringent demands upon those in positions of power.

Francis has achieved something that his predecessors have struggled with for centuries: the Christian objective of being in the world, but not of it. In his case this means participating in global affairs without associating too closely with any party involved. This ultimately reflects his membership of the Society of Jesus, which, contrary to its monastic cousins, shuns the incarceration of the cloister for more active agency in the Church in our world. The Jesuits are armed with a goal of retaining spiritual separation from the trappings of worldly engagements, while at the same time striving for “the defence and propagation of the faith”. From St. Ignatius’ time onwards, this has primarily meant care for the “estranged”, the poor, and the socially marginalised.

For Francis, then, the cross is his absolute reference-point, and to relativise his absolute by fashioning it into a political emblem is to radically misunderstand the theology of his mission. Though lately a new hope for socialists and the boogeyman of the right, we should think of the Pope as enacting the Kierkegaardian motto that “once you label me, you negate me.” In imitation of his God, Francis has “no respect of persons” (Rom 2.11) – or parties for that matter.

The Papal Ensign features two keys, the golden one representing the Pope’s spiritual authority, and the silver his “temporal authority”. Francis’ de-politicisation of the Church is a step towards clarifying the nature of this silver key. As head of a church that has historically sided with agents and contenders of power from monarchies to civil war factions, Francis has made a clear break with history. From the Queen to Evo Morales, Francis understands the leaders of the world as nothing more than “co-operators in the building of a more just and fraternal society”— they are to be alternatively chastised or praised for their actions only insofar as they relate to this goal.

In his interview with Putin last month, Francis refused to indulge either American or Russian interests, where, maintaining his characteristic aloofness from political partisanship, he sided only with the cause of peace. Though Francis by necessity deals with the powerful, his true audience will always be the greater body of worldwide Catholics. Borrowing the language of the ‘church militant’, we need to understand his focus on the Catholic “boots on the ground”, who, like him are Miserando atque Eligendothat is, “lowly but chosen” for a mission of social justice and charity. 

Top Summer Beauty Picks

0

Although the wind sweeping through Oxford may not look hopeful, the temperatures are starting to turn and summer is peeping from around the corner. Whether you’re soon beginning your year abroad or going on holiday to celebrate the end of exams, it is likely that your destination will be warm, bright, and generally better than England on a good day. Whenever I travel to a place with a significantly different climate to that of the UK, I like to take this into account when packing my makeup, as there is nothing worse than streaky foundation and panda eyes in holiday photos!

Having survived lengthy stints in both India and Spain without notable cosmetic disaster, here are a few of my essentials for summer travel:

1. Maybelline Dream Flawless Nude Foundation 

I’ve only just got my hands on this relatively new product. Both the name and the shade range are completely different in Europe, though, so be warned! I had been searching for a product that felt very light on the skin but still provided adequate coverage, and this performs beautifully. The foundation blends easily and genuinely achieves a ‘my skin but better’ look while not feeling as heavy as a regular base.

2. Smashbox Photo Finish Hydrating Foundation Primer 

This is not just for dry skin, but for anyone who wants the ‘staying power’ of a primer without the sticky, tacky feeling of a silicone product. A little goes a long way, and it prevents creasing in your foundation while increasing its wear-time – win! Definitely worth the investment.

3. L’Oreal Volume Million Lashes Excess Waterproof Mascara 

The brush on this mascara is absolutely perfect for lifting, separating and curling lashes, and the formula doesn’t dry out your lashes at all.

Tip: to make the removal easier, use normal mascara for the first coat, then use waterproof mascara on top. Your lashes will be protected from water and humidity but the first coat of normal mascara will stop them from drying out and can be removed much faster!

4. Mac Studio Correct and Conceal Duo 

If you have any kind of hyperpigmentation or discolouration, the idea of wearing a separate colour corrector under your concealer in summer is hardly appealing. I personally couldn’t wait to ditch my heavy Pro-Longwear concealer as the weather improved, but didn’t want my dark undereye circles to be on display. This product is absolutely fantastic; you only need the tiniest amount so it will last for ages. It blends seamlessly into the skin, correcting the darker areas so they don’t look ashy. No additional concealer on top is needed: amazing!

5. Rimmel Brow This Way Styling Gel 

There is such an enormous range of brow gels available since they recently exploded onto the market, but for a budget option the Rimmel offering is great. The brush is a little awkward to use at first, but the product holds really well. It is easy to remove and doesn’t collapse in humid environments.

6. No7 Perfect Light Loose Powder 

If you dislike loose powders and are blessed with a shine-free face, this powder is not for you. Even though I have dry skin, I find I have to set my makeup with a powder to stop it sliding down my face, and this has proven to be my favourite. Sweep it on under your eyes and across your T-zone, and you should be shine-free without the dreaded cakey finish.

7. MAC Prep + Prime Lip 

Lots of us suffer from very dry lips in the summer and sometimes regular lip-balm just doesn’t cut it. This goes on before lipstick and really does a lot to increase colour wear time. It again, lasts for a long time and is compact and easy to carry around in your purse.

8. MAC Prep + Prime Fix+ 

All I need to say about this fixing spray is that when I used it for the first time over my regular makeup, I went to the gym and nothing moved. Witchcraft. It also provides a lovely refreshing feeling over parched skin and, when sprayed onto brushes, intensifies eyeshadow and prevents fallout.

9. Gerard Cosmetics 1995 Lipstick

I don’t normally buy into incredibly hyped American products, but the shade of this lipstick is just so perfect that I’m glad I made an exception this time! This supremely on-trend mauve-brown colour will flatter almost anyone, but it’s particularly amazing if you have olive or brown skin.

10. Lush Roots Scalp Treatment 

Some of us still get dry scalps even in the summer, and there is nothing more refreshing than the feel and scent of mint when it’s sweltering outside! Hair masks are great because they don’t weigh your hair down after you wash them out, unlike many deep conditioners, and any incentive to give yourself a scalp massage is always good!

This is by no means an exhaustive list of summer-friendly products, and it is always fun to get out there and try things for yourself! There is nothing better than hard-working products that stay in place and leave you to concentrate on the most important thing: having a wonderful summer!

 

 

 

 

Maintaining privilege?

0

Why should students vote Labour? The uncompromisingly socialist Prime Minister Clement Attlee once said that the much-squeezed middle classes should vote for his government “because it is the right thing to do”. Such moral courage would inject some desperately needed life into today’s moribund opposition, but instead Labour opts time and time again for the politics of reaction and the defence of whatever interest group they can successfully paint as vulnerable. Osborne’s replacement of the maintenance grant with an increased loan in yesterday’s Budget is a case in point. Whatever the wider merits of his austerity programme, sensible progressives ought to welcome the Chancellor’s announcement as heralding the removal of a socially arbitrary and ineffective subsidy.

There is a compelling narrative to the contrary, of course, a narrative of vicious right-wing cuts to student funding, entrenching socio-economic privilege as our parents’ generation pull up the ladder that allowed them to rise to the top and condemn the children of the less well-off to a lifetime of debt slavery. This story is peddled constantly by the Labour Party, in the Twitter-sphere, in the pages of the Guardian, and from our own representatives at OUSU.

Unfortunately, although it fits neatly with a presumed common sense account of the effects of decreasing direct grants to students, it flies utterly in the face of the facts. When the last government increased the tuition fee cap from £3,000 to £9,000 per year, they enacted essentially the same policy, of replacing funding through grants with funding through loans, on a far larger scale. If this is to be considered a fair test of the measure, which by any reasonable standard it must, the results bear out the Conservative argument: although UCAS models suggest applications last year were 2.5% down on a hypothetical low-fee situation, the decline in applications from less advantaged students was miniscule.

The real barrier to attending university is not the long-term implications for indebtedness, but the up-front costs, and here government assistance remains almost as generous as ever. For the vast majority of the poorest students, funding, at £8,200 a year, is sufficient to cover accommodation and living costs by itself. Exceptional circumstances aside, the only young people who cannot afford to attend university are those from more prosperous families whose parents will not subsidise them. But it is difficult to see what the government can do about this without giving significant sums of money to affluent teenagers who do not need it.

We are right, however, to be concerned about whether this really works in practice. It is obviously not enough to ensure that less affluent students have the immediate financial means to study; it is also essential that the funding system does not act as a deterrent for other reasons. And given the high levels of personal debt already faced by many of Britain’s less well-off households, is it not likely that further increasing student debt will be a serious deterrent to poorer applicants?

Again, this argument is plausible, neat, and wrong. As debts go, student debt is exceptionally benign, involving no bailiffs or unpredictable interest rates and functioning more like a tax, coming directly out of your salary once you earn over £21,000 a year. It would make little financial sense to decline a place at university for fear of it, and indeed the tuition fee experiment yields no evidence that increasing future student debt actually deters working class teenagers from applying. The benefits of university still well outweigh the costs for Britain’s poorer young people.

Since Osborne’s measure is no actual obstacle to social mobility, why do the left so vehemently oppose it? Perhaps because the maintenance grant was seen as a better redistributive measure. But that it most certainly was not. The real losers from the change are those students from poorer backgrounds who go on to earn a relatively high salary. Contrasted with a loan, the maintenance grant had the effect of transferring money from taxpayers, many of them badly off themselves, to a small sub-section of the working class who had, by definition, already escaped from financial poverty. For those who don’t capitalise on university and so don’t pay their loans back, the funding is in effect still a grant. It is hard to find a coherent defence of this particular redistribution that goes beyond a generalised hatred of anything done for such a low moral reason as improving the health of Britain’s public finances. Unfortunately, there is nothing especially progressive about denying the necessity of doing so.

The opposition to this measure, then, is in truth not progressive at all but obstinate and self-serving. Until the left develop a more creative approach to the problems of modern capitalism, they may enjoy plaudits for defending groups hurt by necessary cuts but will fail to enjoy any trust or respect from the public at large. Progressive students should by rights be at the forefront of the movement to recognise this by accepting that some cutbacks are really a means to move forward. 

On make-up and mentality

0

Public speaking. Reconstructive facial surgery. Telling someone you love them. Until last week, the list of acts I considered to be brave fell under a fairly conventional umbrella. Certainly, going make-up free didn’t make the grade. In light of watching blogger Em Ford’s ‘You Look Disgusting’ video, however, I’m not the only one being forced to reconsider.                

Ford suffers from adult acne and her make-up blog, My Pale Skin, is a masterpiece. Watching her tutorials is watching an artist at work; Ford isn’t reserved in showcasing the disparity between her looks before and after applying makeup. I’m particularly loath to refer to it as ‘transformations’ – the implication therein being that foundation hoodwinks, that concealer deceives, that lipstick lies.

“This is false advertising”

“Imagine waking up next to her in the morning”

“Trust no f*cking b*tch with makeup”

Directed at Ford via social media, comments such as these feature in her three minute long ‘You Look Disgusting’ film, and aside from the blinding stupidity of them (what would the internet trolls rather Ford do? Forego make-up, so as not to ‘falsely advertise’ herself? Alas no, because bare-faced, they ‘can’t even look at her’), they shed light on two things. The first is undeniably the power of cosmetics in providing confidence for women, and I refer not only to those with acne. But the second is the flipside of that- a growing dependence on make-up, the way it becomes a sort of armour, because once you know that make-up makes you ‘beautiful’, makes you ‘lovely’, why would you possibly ever be ‘gross’ and ‘horrible’ again?

Unrealistic expectations of beauty are as much fuelled by the cosmetic industry as it claims to solve them, and the profusion of perfect, filtered insta-girls, with flawless skin and dewy ‘no makeup’ selfies does nothing to amend this. The very nature of make-up tells us that its role is illusion- so why are we trying to pretend, and who to? For most of us, social media realises the possibility of our faces- conventionally acceptable or not- being shared, and judged by faceless others. Screens and oceans may separate the viewer from the viewee, but cannot shield from or deflect barbed comments. Perhaps it’s time to accept make-up as Em Ford uses it, not as warpaint, to ‘advertise’ herself to others, not as a shell, open as she is about her appearance makeup-free, but as a way to create and maintain an image of ourselves in our own terms. 

Student maintenance grants to be scrapped

0

Student maintenance grants are to be scrapped, the Chancellor George Osborne announced today in the first Conservative-only Budget since 1996.

Under the Tories’ plans, maintenance grants, which are paid to students from low-income families, will be abolished from the 2016-17 academic year. The grants will be replaced by maintenance loans, which will begin to be paid back by students once they start earning over £21,000 per year. The maximum level of maintenance loan available will be raised to £8,200 under the new system.

Under the current system, students with a household income of less than £25,000 a year are eligible for a non-repayable maintenance grant of £3,387. The amount available decreases as household income increases thereafter, with an income cut off point for support of £42,620. Currently, all students are eligible for maintenance loans, but the amount received varies according to household income.

It was also announced that tuition fees will be allowed to rise with inflation above £9,000 per annum beginning in the academic year 2017-18 at universities that can demonstrate high quality teaching.

In relation to student maintenance, Osborne argued that there is “a basic unfairness of asking taxpayers to fund the grants of people who are likely to earn a lot more than them.” The Chancellor added that the cost of the maintenance grant system was economically unsustainable, and that “if we don’t tackle this problem then our universities will become underfunded and our students won’t get places – and I’m not prepared to let that happen.”

OUSU’s Executive Committee commented that they were “appalled to learn that the government is considering cuts to maintenance grants for students from low-income households. For many students, maintenance grants are a vital means to live, enabling them to access a university education, especially in a city as expensive as Oxford. A significant reduction in the support available to students from low-income households would be devastating to the work of the University to reach out and inspire young people from all backgrounds to apply to Oxford. We call upon the government to defend a vital element of access to higher education and reconsider this possible move.”

Jan Nedvídek, the President of the Oxford University Conservative Association, told Cherwell“Of course in an ideal world, we wouldn’t have to scrap maintenance grants – as someone with low household income, I have myself benefited from them hugely. However, this government has had to make some difficult decisions, and as we saw at the most recent election, there is a feeling in the country that these decisions are sensible and necessary. Being careful with your finances is not mean, but a requirement of basic economic common sense.

“I’m acutely aware that students from poorer backgrounds are finding it difficult to cope with the costs of university. However, let’s be honest here: you only have to repay these loans if you earn above the national average, which you are much more likely to do with a university degree than without one. What’s fair about asking someone on low income to pay for my degree through their taxes? What’s fair about shifting the cost of my education to the next generation through borrowing?

“This budget introduces several great things, like a national living wage for those on the lowest incomes, and scrapping the non-dom status. And let’s remember – according to the Office for National Statistics, those with a degree earn on average 12k per annum more than those without one. This means that on average, your degree will earn you roughly half a million pounds over the course of your life. I think some contribution to the cost of your education is not unreasonable.”

However, Megan Dunn, NUS President, told Cherwell, “Cutting maintenance grants is going to be detrimental to hundreds of thousands of our poorest students who currently rely on them, and risks putting many people off applying to university. 

“We know that our poorest students are the most likely to be deterred by debt, but it could also affect where students choose to live and which courses to take. It will mean staying at home instead of moving into halls or shared accommodation and applying for shorter courses to reduce costs.

“More and more cuts are happening at a time when there is a cost of living crisis. NUS research has shown rent for halls has doubled in recent years, and there has long been a shortfall between average living costs and student support income.”

An Oxford University spokesperson told Cherwell, “Oxford University will work to ensure that any changes to the student funding system do not deter students from disadvantaged backgrounds from applying to or choosing to attend Oxford. In addition to government support, low-income students at Oxford will be eligible for the most generous no-strings financial support of any university in the country, including generous bursary grants and reduced tuition fees for those with the lowest household incomes.”

Keeping fit over summer

0

There is a question forming in the back of many students’ minds as they slowly adjust to the concept of no imminent deadlines or exams, and still others who are perplexed to find they actually miss those six am rowing starts (almost).  Whether you finally have the time to exercise, or have suddenly found yourself responsible for setting that time, a dilemma has presented itself.  Without the bounteous resources of Oxford’s college and university gyms, sports grounds, and organized and inclusive sports teams, how exactly do you keep (or get) fit over summer?

The obvious answer is to join a gym – but this process isn’t always as simple as it first appears. Even finding one a reasonable distance away may be too much for some more rural students, and not all will offer an honest, easily escaped no-contract membership, leaving you trapped paying for at least a year.  Even if you do only end up paying for the time you’re using it, gyms are pricey and tend to hike up fees for non-contract members.  You often find yourself paying more than the monthly fee: many gyms will charge extra for sundry deposits and administrative fees, for essential “extras” like lockers, showers and towels to wipe down equipment, and for classes and equipment training.  Although keeping up with gym routines from Oxford or using ones you found on YouTube might work for some, others may want to try something else.

Running, the poor man’s treadmill, presents itself as a cheaper, and less community-dependent, option.  It requires no passes or payment or parking and the only equipment you need is a pair of good trainers (and possibly a sports bra).  It forces you outside and gives you an (optimistically) daily dose of nature and vitamin D.  However, the monotony of the movement isn’t for everyone and the self-motivation required may be too much.  It certainly was for me, who, inspired by Bradley Cooper in Silver Linings Playbook, tossed on my trainers and a binbag and got as far as the newsagents down the street before I got heckled by some lads outside a pub and decided that I was too lazy and embarrassed for anything this public.

This led me first to Zumba classes in a local primary school gym hall.  It’s ideal for people as lazy as me, as you can’t put your hour a week off if the exact time is set for you and when you get there the threat of mild social embarrassment and a vague sense of competition with the middle aged women around you will keep you going till the endorphins kick in.  Most of the moves are standard aerobics so you can copy fairly easily, but the occasional booty shake or jazz hands lets anyone who was the least coordinated kid in their age 6-8 ballet class pretend they can dance (so long as there aren’t any mirrors around).

But if shakin’, or more likely squattin’, your moneymaker isn’t your cup of tea, I’d recommend my new favourite pastime: swimming.  Ideal for full body toning, strength and flexibility, swimming is recommended by health professionals to everyone, from practicing athletes to doddering grannies.  I was previously partially put off around age thirteen by the same reason as many pubescent girls: body self-consciousness.  But, when for the first time in years I stood by my local pool in the brand new swimsuit I’d spent almost an hour choosing, I had the shocking revelation that no one was actually looking at me.  Filled largely with a combination of kids aged eleven and under, pensioners, and tired looking parents, the pool was teeming with bodies with their own problem areas and wobbly bits, and amongst them I didn’t stand out at all.  Standing there with my legs artfully crossed to hide my cellulite, I suddenly felt like a bit of an idiot for putting this off so long.  Thankfully, I don’t think anyone gave a shit.

Making love fun

0

The bells of St Mary’s toll and all too soon tenth week is upon us. And before the chimes can even ring out, I’m reaching for the chocolates and wine whilst indulging in a soppy film about romances that never can be, musing about my past conquests and flings of (insert week of particularly heightened moral decay)th week’s past. There are no two ways about it: Oxford is an environment which makes love hard. Endlessly scanning JSTOR articles and mindlessly thrashing a few sentences upon a page you hope make sense in the dead of night whilst your pull still languishes in your bed/pit is hardly conducive to a life-spanning romance. The best you can expect from your pull after that oh-so-wise mid-essay trip to cellar you decided to take is a fuck that doesn’t end with you being kicked out at 6am into the dark Oxford night, cursing the fact you live in North Oxford.

The question about love in the Ox that I still can’t answer at this point in my degree is this: why have romance when you can also have fun? I don’t mean (on the whole) ‘no strings attached’ shags. I mean something more akin to a rom-com; but without the shitness that comes with that deplorable genre of cinema.

The hopeless romantic within us (or at least us Humanities students) longs for the day someone pidges you a freshly written Petrarchan sonnet, complete with a bouquet of roses and marriage proposal written in beautiful calligraphy. But do you really want to live like a literary character? You may appreciate the heightened romanticism Flaubert crafts of the unfulfilled/disappointed love. But do you really want to work into the small hours searching hopelessly for a dissertation title, to be rewarded with nothing but a suggestive hand touch and furtive glances from across the Rad Cam like the readers of Madame Bovary? With but nine terms to find Mr/Ms/Dr right – I think not.

Being one of the many who have loved and lost, I can attest first-hand: being serious and forgetting the fun that can be had cannot go hand in hand if you wish for things to work. The advice I would give to incoming freshers is simple: university romance is a serious occurrence, but one that needn’t been taken so seriously. Who the fuck cares how long you’ll stay together, whether you will marry or the dowry arrangements the in-laws may be plotting in the background. We are young and living in the Oxford bubble. I want someone who will laugh at my terrible jokes and push me off my punt before grabbing me back and kissing me hard. I want to not feel my relationship is as serious as the crippling silence echoing around the Rad Cam in finals-season. There’s a time and place when love and bank statements meet; but uni is not that. Make loving fun and carefree whilst you still can.

Why I’ve never been to a festival…

0

Don’t get me wrong, I love music. I spent the entirety of my teens spending every penny I could muster on gigs. I have even compiled a list of every gig I’ve ever been to on my phone (I know it’s sad but you probably do it too), which I started when it began to reach the forties. Yet, I’ve never been to a festival. This usually elicits the same reaction as when I admit I’ve never seen or read Harry Potter: total disgust.

When I was 14, I branched out to attend the teen-must-do which is T4 On The Beach, but I’m not counting that. Festivals to me are muddy, gritty camping affairs which go on for days and involve little-to-no showering. However, whilst the idea of a flooded tent and grim toilet facilities doesn’t exactly sound amazing, it’s not the conditions which put me off (although perhaps a sunny INmusic in Croatia would be more up my street). Festivals are also just really expensive ways to see bands. Take Reading for example. There may be a couple of bands you’ve heard of, maybe even your favourite, but they will be mashed up with a lot of really unknown bands. Mumford & Sons alongside Modern Baseball. I know it’s an edgy way to discover bands you’ve never heard of before, but so is Spotify or Soundcloud, and they don’t set you back £213.

Perhaps I am boring, but I’d rather pick and choose who I want to see, rather than commit, in the case of Glastonbury, a year in advance to spending over two hundred pounds on seeing Kanye. I know it’s a game of luck, and the “experience is about more than just the music”, but as a music fanatic, surely music is the very reason I’d be spending my student loan on a few days in the mud? There is also a small part of me that feels like festivals have become too corporate and too much about celebrities and fashion since I’ve been old enough to attend. If I’d have been twenty in 1970 when the first festival at Worthy Farm was held, I’d have been desperate to pay £1 for free milk and a chance to see The Kinks. I’d have certainly come back the next year to see David Bowie for free. In my head, that’s what a festival should be. A cheap way to see lots of music in a basic environment; not a chance for the rich and famous to be photographed wearing the latest fashion and eating gourmet reindeer burgers that cost as much as my first phone. I know this nostalgia for a time I never experienced is ridiculous, but the comparison with festivals forty years ago certainly doesn’t heighten my desire to go to one today. Maybe if I went, I would be converted. Maybe I could get around the inherent cheapskate in me by working at one. However, until that point, I am proud to declare and defend my festival virginity.

All alone in India

0

A few months ago, intimidated by competitive chat about Goldman and BAML and online maths tests, I decided I wanted to do an internship in India.  I set about finding something CV-worthy and out-of-the-box, lucrative and cultural. The best of both worlds, I thought. And so I found myself an internship at a well-regarded international publishing company with offices just outside Delhi. They would send me to one of their luxury eco-lodges in the Himalayas for a long weekend, and then give me the project of writing and designing a website to market their properties to western holiday-makers. The dream, I thought smugly, a free mountain holiday and a few weeks in Delhi while my friends are all working in banks. #Winning!

As it turned out, things have been a little different than what I expected. Working in India, needless to say, is not a normal internship ‘experience’. Every morning, the all-male work force of my ‘family-run’ guesthouse makes me sweet, spicy chai and aloo paratha, an amazing sort of deep-fried potato cake served with curd. Then, at some point between 8.30 and 10, with no warning, I’ll hear a series of crazy honks as my driver, the office secretary, comes to pick me up for work. In the car, we chat about the ridiculous traffic, Bollywood movies, and how she doesn’t agree with her family’s obsession with arranged marriage. In our air-conditioned car, we weave around cows and tuk-tuks, and try to ignore the street children’s faces in the window as they offer us flowers or bubble-guns. When we get to the office, everyone jumps up to shake my hand. At lunch, instead of a trip to Prêt A Manger, a delicious feast of thalis and idlis, dosas and chapatti, invariably cooked by aunts or sisters, is unwrapped and shared out. In the evenings, rather than heading to a funky bar in Shoreditch, I wander round a temple or write my diary. 

One of the most important things to know about interning abroad is that it can be incredibly lonely. That’s not to say the people I’ve met in India aren’t crazily friendly; They’ve gone out of their way to let me join in with their family worship, teach me how to make chapattis in the kitchen and laugh when I set them on fire, and take me on terrifying helmetless motorbike rides to buy mangoes. It’s easy to make friends in India, and from the first day I knew all the office gossip, had invitations to dinner, and loved chatting to people in the colourful markets. Being the only foreign girl automatically made me the centre of attention; I was constantly offered chai, subjected to questions like ‘why aren’t you married?’, and the target of random hair stroking. Speaking English is also an automatic commodity in the office, and reduces your chances of being given pointless, mundane tasks. In this way, it’s incredibly sociable and rewarding working abroad.

But I’d underestimated how far from home, in both in amazing and daunting ways, living and working in India would make me feel. The loneliness comes from a total lack of familiarity, something I had been warned about but to which I thought I would be immune. When you know you’ve been massively ripped off by a tuk-tuk driver, when groups of men glare at you in the street, when you see a dead dog on the pavement, or when the cook thinks you’re a superfreak because you don’t know what ‘poha’ is, you start to realize you’re all alone in a subcontinent where, despite your best efforts, you really don’t belong. Last night, as I was lying in bed in the middle of the rainy Himalayas with no phone signal, no air-con, and a massive cockroach hiding somewhere in my room ready to pounce (I didn’t realize they don’t bite!), it was was easy to question what the hell I was doing here.

But then I remembered, being in India is actually an amazing adventure. As I go about my day-to-day life, it is impossible not to appreciate what an amazing place this is. Today, I picked the juiciest mangos I’ve ever tasted from a tree in the garden. Yesterday, I had the meaning of life explained to me while I waited for a train, and the day before, I stared straight at the glowing red sun without hurting my eyes because the smog is so thick in Delhi. Last Tuesday, the guy who sits opposite me in the office told me he wasn’t allowed to marry the love of his life because her parents had threatened to disown her, and I suddenly realized how incredibly lucky I am to choose who I end up marrying. I may not have found what I was looking for in India, but maybe that’s not what it’s all about.

Whilst doing an internship abroad has its low moments, I would completely recommend it if you want to throw yourself out of your comfort zone and learn about yourself. The experiences you do gain, beyond the cockroaches, calories and the reluctant realization that you might have culture shock, are, as corny as it sounds, invaluable and life-changing in their own way.