Thursday 9th April 2026
Blog Page 1176

Global politicians wade into RMF debate

0

Frederik Willem de Klerk, former President of South Africa, has written a letter to The Times, published yesterday, voicing his opposition to calls for the statue of Cecil Rhodes at Oriel College to be removed. This follows a similar intervention two days ago by former Australian Prime Minister and Rhodes Scholar Tony Abbott into the debate, which gained national and international attention a week ago following Oriel’s receptive response to the movement.

Co-founder of Rhodes Must Fall in Oxford Ntokozo Qwabe has also labelled the French flag a “violent symbol” and said he would support a campaign to remove it from universities, telling The Sunday Times, “I would agree with that in the same way that the presence of a Nazi flag would have to be fought against.”

Oriel College has recently announced the imminent removal of a plaque honouring the white supremacist colonial and a six-month listening period to determine the fate of the statue.

De Klerk, South Africa’s most recent white President, stated, “We do not commemorate historic figures for their ability to measure up to current conceptions of political correctness, but because of their actual impact on history,” 

The former President, an Afrikaner, who was instrumental in ending racial segregation in South Africa in the 1990s and was succeeded by Nelson Mandela, labelled the Rhodes Must Fall in Oxford movement “a folly”. He went on to say, “My people – the Afrikaners – have greater reason to dislike Rhodes than anyone else. He was the architect of the Anglo-Boer War that had a disastrous impact on our people.

“Yet the National Party government never thought of removing his name from our history,” he added, in reference to his former party.

The Boer War, in which thousands died, is infamous for Britain’s use of concentration camps against black people and the Dutch-origin Boers, the ancestors of today’s Afrikaners.

Tony Abbott, who was Prime Minister of Australia until September of this year, has sought to discourage Oriel strongly from conceding to the student-led movement any further, commenting to The Independent, “Oxford would damage its standing as a great university if it were to substitute moral vanity for fair-minded enquiry. The university and its students should prefer improving today’s orthodoxies to imposing them on our forebears.”  

He also remarked, “The University should remember that its mission is not to reflect fashion but to seek truth and that means striving to understand before rushing to judge.

“Racism is a dreadful evil but we all know that now… It’s a pity that Rhodes was, in many respects, a man of his times.  We can lament that he failed to oppose unjust features of his society while still celebrating the genius that led to the creation of the Rhodes scholarships.”

The Rhodes Must Fall campaign and Qwabe have come under increased scrutiny in the past week in the national press. Having been branded a ‘hypocrite’ by many online commentators, The Sunday Times today brought to national attention Qwabe’s response to last month’s ISIS-affiliated terrorist attacks in Paris made publicly on Facebook, stating, “I refuse to be cornered by white supremacist hashtagism into believing that showing my disgust for the loss of lives in France mandates identifying with a state that has for years terrorised – and continues to terrorise – innocent lives in the name of imperialism, colonialism, and other violent barbarities.

“I do NOT stand with France. Not while it continues to terrorise and bomb Afrika [sic] & the Middle East for its imperial interests.”

In the Sunday Times article entitled ‘After Rhodes he wants to tear down tricolore’, Qwabe declined to say whether he thought France and ISIS were equally bad, but commented,  “Well, [France] has committed acts of terror in numerous parts of the world” and, “I wouldn’t say French bombs are somehow less significant.”

Rhodes Must Fall has published a response to Tony Abbott’s intervention into the debate which is printed in full below:

Dear Tony,

We read your recent letter, begging Oxford to protect a statue of your old chum, Cecil Rhodes. It was filled with what you call ‘suppositories of wisdom’.

This isn’t the first time you’ve trivialised genocide: ‘there was a holocaust of jobs under the opposition, Madame Speaker’. Just an honest mistake, of course.

But now you’ve really put your foot in it, Tony. You say removing a statue of old Cecil would lower Oxford’s standing in the world? When the University accepted you, it already did that.

Hate to break it to you, Tony, but opposing glorifications of racist mass murderers is not a ‘fashion’. In case you haven’t noticed, we’re not doing this to win a popularity contest. On the other hand, if old Cecil fell, that might look bad for your flailing political career, wouldn’t it, Tony. Very unfashionabe indeed.

Apparently fighting racism is no longer virtuous to you because ‘everybody knows it’s wrong’.

Here’s the thing, Tony: we think it’s rich of a white former Prime Minister of Australia, a country in which you’re sixteen times more likely to be incarcerated if you’re Aboriginal, to give the world lectures on racial justice. We won’t mention Australia’s own history, Tony, because that would be very, very unfashionable.

We now know why you didn’t speak up about violent police killings abroad, or the racial composition of the illegal detention centres you built at home: you’re avoiding the fashion! You’ve been avoiding fashion for a long time, Tony. Time to give it a try.

We look forward to hearing more of your opinions, now that you have a bit more time on your hands. Sorry about the whole ouster thing. Don’t worry, being removed from a high position is soon to be in fashion.

All our love,

Rhodes Must Fall in Oxford

Top 10 albums of 2015

0

For anyone who claims that the album is a dying art form and argues that we should cut our losses and forget about them altogether, I reflect upon the hours I spent putting together a list of my Top 10 records from 2015 (in no particular order). From the heavy clashes of Young Fathers to the wisened folked-up words of Laura Marling, the output of cohesive albums this year has been outstanding. The industry shouldn’t give up just yet.

Stand-out tracks from each of the albums have been compiled into a playlist embedded below.

1. Father John Misty – I Love You, Honeybear

He previously released music as part of Fleet Foxes and as J. Tillman. Now, as Father John Misty, Josh Tillman releases I Love You Honeybear, his sardonic ode to love, filled with lush drawn-out melodies and ridiculously witty lyrics. A personal favourite reads: “She says, like literally, music is the air she breathes / And the malaprops make me want to fucking scream.” Technical grammatical terms in raucous lyrics get me every time. Father John Misty feels like some melodramatic stage character, but these tunes are deeply personal; sarcasm is laced between profundities; tales of threesomes and awkward sex are set against romantic lines like “I can hardly believe I found you and I’m terrified of that” and “People are boring / But you’re something else completely”. These juxtapositions make the album sensual, hilarious and deftly intelligent.

Stand-out track: ‘Chateau Lobby #4 (in C for Two Virgins)’

2. Courtney Barnett – Sometimes I Sit and Think, and Sometimes I Just Sit

The word ‘slacker’ is thrown around a lot in the Courtney Barnett-related press but this album proves she is anything but. Meticulously-strung vocals detailing mundanities such as house-hunting in outer Melbourne or organic food shopping stand out against punchy guitar riffs and a garage-like rhythm section. These songs set into a ceaseless groove and her lyrical analysis of such day-to-day trivialities sets out Barnett’s Australian drawl as one of the resounding voices of our generation.  

Stand-out track: ‘Aqua Profunda’

3. Tame Impala – Currents

Pre-album releases – and there were several before the July release date – moved many hardcore Kevin Parker fans to fear as he seemed to have strayed from his signature antipodean guitar-heavy pysch-rock. But what Parker can do on a fret board he can do with even more ferocity on a synth, as the woozy genius of Currents proved. Yes, this is Parker in his most pop-like suit to date, but he does not let catchiness detract from his attention to sonic detail. The precise craft of ‘Let it Happen’ – which somehow manages to sound naturally free-wheeling, despite this precision – may well set it out as my song of the year, too.

Stand-out track: ‘Let It Happen’

4. Laura Marling – Short Movie

Each time she comes back – and with five albums by the age of 25 this is quite often – Marling is back with a vengeance. This time is no different as we hear Laura “go electric” with a bucked up Rickenbacker guitar and plenty of lovelorn lyrics. Instrumental riffs are tighter than ever, yet the songstress’ vocals comfortably take on a life of their own, her beautiful Dylan-esque sprechgesang more wonderful than ever. Marling’s musicianship is definite and precise, even if she still seems not to know where her head is at on accounts of love.

Stand-out track: ‘How Can I’

5. Sufjan Stevens – Carrie & Lowell

Stevens’ first album in five years details his relationship with his mother and step-father (Carrie and Lowell). It would be very easy for this record to be saturated with shmush and cliché, but these melodies are sincere without dragging, his lyrical content both elegant and hard-hitting. Stunning guitar-plucking right from the very first track underpins morbid-sounding lyrics such as “we’re all gonna die” on the undeniably teary ‘Fourth of July’. The wonder here is in the uplifting poignancy of the whole album, despite this assumed melancholy.

Stand-out track: ‘Should Have Known Better’

6. Oneohtrix Point Never – Garden of Delete

Trying to describe this myriad of pulses is a hard task. The album may well first seem brash and messy; it certainly doesn’t hold back on the texture and often outlandishly computerised sounds. But with some sensitivity and a bit of time, the stark emotion of Daniel Lopatin’s creation is evident: hiding behind computers – basic MIDIs and vocoders – doesn’t make this record any less human. In fact, the story of Lopatin’s character, Ezra, which the record – along with a series of promotional blogs – tells, is as tangible as sound waves could ever be. Reversals, squirms, whooshes: the soundtrack to a teenage life.

Stand-out track: ‘Mutant Standard’

7. Ezra Furman – Perpetual Motion People

Often categorised as good ol’ fashioned rock ‘n’ roll, Ezra Furman plays anything from garage to blues to funk-pop on this eclectic record. It is both politically outward-looking and personally introspective, with incessantly catchy riffs to boot. If Courtney Barnett is the voice of our generation, Furman is the voice of all those who have ever felt on the outside – the ingenious bystander who looks in from the periphery, with perhaps an even more intriguing story to tell.

Stand-out track: ‘Wobbly’

8. Unknown Mortal Orchestra – Multi-Love

If the enthralling backstory of Ruban Nielson’s polyamorous relationship with his wife and another woman (the real meaning behind eclectic banger ‘Multi-Love’) wasn’t interesting enough, the woozy funk of this album should catch your attention. The whole record is saturated with incredibly lush drum sounds, and the continuous ebb and flow of guitar and brass harmonies is something for your ears to really grapple with. Left belting out “I don’t want to solve your puzzle anymore!”, Multi-Love  is a serious cacophony of emotion, as if “we’re in love but I don’t get what you see in me” wasn’t enough for our tender heartstrings.

Stand-out track: ‘Can’t Keep Checking My Phone’

9. East India Youth – Culture of Volume

Bournemouth-born William Doyle doesn’t shy away from experimentation with his expansive electro-synth intricacies on this quietly genius second record. Initially, the throbs and crackles are unsettling.  But this instrumental labyrinth of encrypted sounds and slides fits perfectly underneath Doyle’s voice, which has a deft normality and slight nasal tone. This vocal honesty is warming. Through triumphant crescendos and gritty techno beats, it is Doyle’s exquisite ear for harmonic disposition which makes this record so enthralling.

Stand-out track: ‘Hearts That Never’

10. Young Fathers – White Men are Black Men Too

The curse of the Mercury doesn’t seem to have affected this Glaswegian trio. After winning the prize for their debut, Dead, last year, Young Fathers were not thrown off course and instead went on to release this startlingly down-to-earth second record. From the initial calls and shouts of the pounding ‘Still Running’to the incessant shuffling claxon of Old Rock n Roll’, the vocals on this record range from warm and ringing to harsh and gritty. Shouts of “I’m tired of playing the good black” are stark and necessarily brash, with the politicised hip-hop/rap/funk once again respectably highlighting Young Fathers as one of the few current bands who have a socio-political agenda to shout about. What’s a broken heart in comparison?

Stand-out track: ‘Liberated’

Fairy tale of the empty village

0

“No,” she said, jamming her feet into her boots, “no, he’s not going to go like this.” She stabbed her hands into her gloves, jerked tight the cords of her hiking boots and finished the knot.

In the mountains you feel free, he remembered as the foothills fell away behind him and the mountains rose up around. He was going up too, higher and higher till all he could see was the snow on the sides of the peaks stretching free, silent, alone. You couldn’t think of anyone up here, anything – didn’t have to. In the mountains you feel free.

There were a lot more little birds than you’d expect in the snowy fir tree next to the chapel. Occasionally one would jump off into the air and soar around the little bell tower – not much more than a stack of icy rocks around an old green bell – then fly off and coast away to the peaks. Everyone was lost out here, up in the mountains where you’d only come to escape. You could wander the winter paths till they turned back into empty village streets and never really notice the change.

He had screamed at them, lost it, thrown himself out of the crowded Christmas living room with barely a thought for the pain in his mother’s look, cared less about his father. He grabbed a bag and pushed out the door into the cold, past his sister who seemed right on the point of breaking, collapsing. At the corner of the street he had paused, looked up to the mountains then turned for a second. His sister was standing on the porch. Her dark face was still covered with tears, glistening white from the ugly light above the door but there was something in her eyes that seemed different. Determined. He pushed it out of his thoughts.

People would walk into the town and stay for a few days, never talking, drifting the streets barely aware of one another. All sorts of people: old ones able to walk but with the look of people who’d been left inside like spare old sheets for years; young ones with empty faces and broken eyes. Others too – uncaring old bachelors, muttering stumbling old women, broken ill people whose worlds had tossed them aside with a pill, or a pension, or less.

The mountains beyond the town had a pull. People would stand there for days at the edge of town, right where the stone cut off suddenly and suddenly the mountains threw themselves up in front of you, spreading around and lead off jaggedly in the distance. They would stand there and look out into the snow and rocks and empty air, where the trees below seemed so small and led away shrinking till they too gave up. They would stand for a few days, alone or in little groups of two – only the old people ever came in twos – and then drift out into the mountains, their few bags left behind.

When they first stepped out, they looked – for a second – free.

His sister passed all sorts as she climbed the forest path from the plains, eyes set firmly on the icy footing, feet stamping over knotted roots and piles of snow. They were a little like ghosts, and the forest seemed to whisper as she walked past, like the gnarled old trunks hid voices and eyes.

The light up there was strange; always forest twilight, the time of night when nothing was quite right and it was hard to think of what was good with the world. The sun never quite made it up past the mountains, there, so the light stayed dull hollow grey all day and just got heavier at night.

There wasn’t much left for Rose at home; her children and grandchildren used to come by at Easter and New Year, and then that had stopped, and instead it was just a phone call once or twice a year. Then the Christmas phone call became more and more like an afterthought, and soon it was just her. She would look back over the family holiday photos: weekends down in Devon, where the kids would bury – try to bury – their Dad in the sand and she’d chat with their auntie and they’d laugh and have a glass or two or many once the children had gone to sleep. The memories were something, but sometimes it felt like they were only bound to make her feel worse. In the evenings, when there was nothing else to do and but lie in bed, her thoughts ran up and passed over and over her eyes till she could only cry or sit there hating the thoughts and the awful self she’d become. It was ok, though – numbness was coming, stronger and stronger, and that was enough for her.

His sister was halfway through the grim, teeming forest. There was a small cottage just ahead, little puffs of smoke breaking out from the chimney in cheerful waves. She could hear noise from inside, music and laughter bursting out whenever a gust of wind knocked a shutter open and gold light spilled out over the snow, for a second. The smell of something cooking drifted towards her. She went inside and sat down, and smiled at the steaming bowl pushed towards her.

Rose was one of the figures up in the mountains now, drifting always nearer to the edge of town. The brother and her almost smiled at each other, once, but the rush was too painful for them both and they turned away, grey faces afraid of the flush of warmth. They began to see each other more often, though, walking the streets past the chapel where the birds fluttered up and away.

It was not enough for her, a stranger’s smile. He could see her getting emptier and he felt the same inside him, and he cared less and less about the emptiness inside them both. They would get closer and closer to the bare rock at the edge of town, where you could see the mountains and they called you, where drifting down away from the last town was so much easier, the mountains said, was right.

But suddenly it became intolerable, suddenly the thought of that smile was like a lit cigarette burning on his skin. She had reminded him of something, there was something about the sadness and the smile lines around her eyes that reminded him of someone, he knew it. He stopped, turned wildly, rushed back, past the village, down, down the mountain until he came to the old tavern he’d half-noticed as he’d been wandering up.

He burst into the doorway, still manic, and stared in. His eyes were wide, adjusting to the sudden light and the amused, confused smiles offered his way. Then he was knocked back, blinded, his vision became a bundle of arms and a pile of hair was in his face and all he could hear was sobbing, his sister’s crying, his crying. The people in the tavern watched them knowingly, gently, as they stood there with her face pressed into his shoulder.

They stood there for a while, and his sister took his hand, like when they were little and she used to look after him -the little brother that he was. They’d used to call them Hansel and Gretel, he remembered. Such a perfect little team: they could have been from the story. There was a whisper in the air, though, and he could see the smile that had called him back here. Holding his sister’s hand he led her up to the town and they pushed back past the shadows with the warmth of the other like a lucky charm against the darkness. Rose was there, standing under the little old chapel, the last dregs of the glow on her skin draining away as the mountains pulled it away from her.

He threw himself on her and his sister did too, grabbing at her hands and pulling at her faded old skirt and shawl, skipping around like children with their grandma. Her face crinkled, cracked along the old smile lines around her eyes and suddenly the memories her loneliness had locked away flooded back, washed hot and soft around her warm, wrinkled face. Nothing had changed, in the mountains, but she saw it how it was; the light suddenly warm, the sky gold-pink with streaks of blue ink dashed on a palette, and the three of them could see what was there.

As they turned away, he looked back at the mountains and the empty village filled with drifting, lonely souls. The call of the mountains and that empty village was still in his ears, but now it was little more than a whisper. He smiled at Rose, and the three walked back through the shadows to the warmth and light, to the tables of food where they could talk, bicker, and laugh.

Their sadness has gone, in the fairy-tale way.

But reader, remember, as you chatter and play,

Those left alone on this Christmas Day.

Merry Christmas I guess

0

Christmas approaches. The lights erratically flash on the tree, punters down their pints with a Christmassy wink, carol singers wheezily knock on doors, and I, much like every other Christmas, have caught a cold.

In case you have not guessed, I feel a little tepid when it comes to Christmas. However do not fear, this is not the beginning of a rant on capitalism, materialism, or any other -ism. My opinion does not stem from an interesting and article-worth indignance. I just don’t really care anymore.

Before Father Christmas dissolved into thin air, it was the pleasantest of literary realities. Even when my brothers began to openly make jokes about Father Christmas being my parents, I would shake my head vehemently. “No, no, no!”, I would exclaim, “you’ve got it all wrong!” The poetic notion of an old happy Platonic man delivering presents alongside many intelligent and benevolent reindeer, was an image I wasn’t keen to shed. I was too young to question why he gave to those who needed it far less. I tried not to question why the girl in my class got letters from him in the lead up to Christmas, whilst my parents told me that he was far too busy in Lapland for communication. The mystery of Father Christmas was my own happy little story, played out before me every year.

Alongside this were the myriad of books which appeared from our attic every year. I learnt that everybody celebrated Christmas – bears, mice, babies, and even the Grinch. As I developed into the familiar model of a grumpy teen I was once caught off-guard by the books that were reminiscently pulled down from the attic. For on every page I turned, I couldn’t find the words. Much like when YouTube clips of Pingu are sprung up on laptops by the occasional nostalgic friend, I couldn’t quite believe that Don’t Forget me, Father Christmas or The Snowman didn’t have words. Those stories remained so strongly in my head, and yet, when I tried to reread them, all that stood in front of me were illustrations.

Christmas, I learnt, is essentially a big fat lie. Told gracefully, elegantly and elaborately, but it still remains a large helping of deceit. But readers, don’t fear, there’s a moral in it – how exciting. For see! See how story-telling is so integral to our lives! Just like Father Christmas was illustrated through our parents’ story-telling, we made our own stories too through the thread of a decent picture book. For that I thank you Christmas. But that does not mean I will be humming Michael Bauble through my sniffles, or decking the halls with boughs of holly. And I don’t advise you do either. But, in the true spirit of Christmas, maybe open a book. And make sure it’s not from your reading list.

A merry, sporty Christmas

0

Christmas is great. Seeing the family is nice, the presents usually aren’t too disappointing and don’t even get me started on the food. I love Christmas for the most part. What I usually don’t like about it is that for sports fans, there really isn’t much going on. Traditionally, there aren’t many annual fixtures on Christmas for sports fans to drool over. But alas, all hope is not lost – this year, there are some interesting matches scheduled during the Christmas festivities. Here are Cherwell’s top picks this Christmas for sports fans to justifiably sit in front of the TV for, rather than having to suffer through Love Actually for the twentieth time.   

Christmas Eve – San Diego Chargers vs. Oakland Raiders

Okay, I’ll admit this isn’t a great start. Both teams have been eliminated from the playoffs with two games to spare, so the importance of the match is almost equivalent to a friendly pick-up in the park. For NFL veterans, perhaps the sole appeal of this match is to appreciate Oakland’s Charles Woodson, one of the greatest safeties to ever play the game, in his last few appearances as a professional athlete. Having been selected to play in the Pro Bowl game, along with defensive-end Khalil Mack and fullback Marcel Reese, Woodson is approaching the end of a hall-of-fame career. For NFL newbies, maybe use this opportunity to try to figure out how American football actually works – if this gets too tiring, then I guess Love Actually is always available.

Christmas Day – Cleveland Cavaliers vs. Golden State Warriors

For basketball fanatics, this game should’ve been highlighted and circled out on your calendars ever since the schedule was released in September. The two teams played out one the most entertaining finals ever this June, with Golden State claiming the title despite LeBron James proving yet again that he’s probably half human and half alien. As the current leaders of their respective conferences, this match promises to be a clash of epic proportions. The Warriors hold a 24-1 record and have yet to lose a game at home, armed with their lethal small-ball offence and suffocating defence led by Draymond Green, the basketball equivalent of a Swiss Army knife. The Cavs are no walkovers either, with an impressive record of 18-7, and the recent return of All-Star point guard Kyrie Irving will only boost the squad’s confidence.

Oh and by the way, Stephen Curry will be playing against LeBron James. The former is the reigning MVP who’s having one of the most dominant seasons ever; the latter is LeBron James, aforementioned human-alien hybrid. This is what happened in Game 5 of the 2015 NBA finals when both were at their apex. If that isn’t enough to draw you to watch this match, then maybe basketball just isn’t for you.

Boxing Day – Liverpool vs. Leicester City, South Africa vs. England Test

‘Chat shit, get banged’. That goes to the people who claim that they predicted Leicester City to sit at the top of the Premier League by Christmas. Led by Vardy and Mahrez – who have become this year’s Fantasy Football gods – Leicester City has run rampant in the Premier League, highlighted perhaps by their win over Chelsea that ultimately resulted in the sacking of the Special One. They’ll visit Anfield on Boxing Day to take on a struggling Liverpool, who has been anything but consistent since Klopp took over the team in October, as shown by their horrendous display against Watford last weekend. In what will surely be the highlight game of the day, hopefully full of spectacular goals and outrageous Vardy chants, football fans are in for a treat this Saturday.

For those who enjoy a bit of cricket, England visit South Africa to begin their four-Test series on the 26th. Ambitious England, the fifth-ranked side in the world, hope to claim victory over the number-one ranked team, who have yet to fully recover from their humiliating defeat against India. Neither team is in brilliant form, and the questionable status of James Anderson for the first test only adds to the uncertainty of the outcome. Given how (tediously) long Test matches are, this could be an option for those planning to be hungover on Boxing Day either from food or, dare I say, alcohol. 

Oxford Rhodes scholar attacked for "hypocrisy"

0

Ntokozo Qwabe, a leading participant in the Rhodes Must Fall Oxford campaign, has been criticised following greater public awareness that he is a recipient of a Rhodes scholarship. Attacks came in the form of online comments, while a newspaper column by Mary Beard and comments in a televised interview with Channel Four also appeared to criticise Mr Qwabe.

Following widespread coverage of the Rhodes Must Fall campaign in Oxford, Mr Qwabe has been attacked on his Facebook page, with one comment condemning his actions as “disgraceful hypocrisy”, whilst another called for Qwabe to “Give back your scholarship and remove the chip off your shoulder.”

The online criticism spread well beyond Oxford University students, with one outburst stating, “Your hypocrisy is breath-taking. It would appear that you weren’t too principled when offered a Rhodes scholarship. If you object so much to this nation’s lack of political correctness, the answer is in your hands. I wasn’t lucky enough to go to university and I take your narrow minded attitude as a slap in the face to the freedoms we fought world wars to keep.”  

Writing in the Times Literary Supplement, Professor Beard also appeared to question Qwabe’s consistency. In her opinion piece, the Cambridge Classics Professor wrote, “I really don’t think that you can have your cake and eat it here: I mean you can’t whitewash Rhodes out of history, but go on using his cash.”

She added, “It’s won by empowering those students to look up at Rhodes and friends with a cheery and self-confident sense of unbatterability – much as I find myself looking up at the statues of all those hundreds of men in history who would vehemently have objected to women having the vote, let alone the kind of job I have.”

In a Channel Four interview on Monday evening, Mr Qwabe discussed the Rhodes Must Fall project and his own scholarship with Sophia Cannon, a regular contributor on national television for social and political matters. During the course of the programme, Mr Qwabe was told by Ms Cannon, “You are the colonial project”, in reference to his acceptance of a Rhodes scholarship. Mr Qwabe later stated that “she muted me in many ways with her tragic colonial apologism”.

Mr Qwabe has rejected the charges of inconsistency against him, asserting, “Rhodes did not have a scholarship. It was never his money. All that he looted must absolutely be returned immediately. I’m no beneficiary of Rhodes. I’m a beneficiary of the resources and labour of my people which Rhodes pillaged and slaved.”

Mr Qwabe has also supported by many within the Rhodes Must Fall campaign. One supporter, Brian Kwoba, recently stated, “I condemn the charges of “hypocrisy” and other similar attacks on RMF member Ntokozo Qwabe. The selection process to be a Rhodes scholar is rigorous. Scholars who are selected are encouraged to be world leaders and promote positive social change. If they decide to do this on uncomfortable issues like Rhodes’ legacy, that is their choice. No scholar should be silenced or forced to pledge allegiance to one of history’s most notorious colonialists. …Rhodes remains a despicable man, whose actions have had a lasting adverse impact in the lands he plundered.”

The Rhodes Must Fall movement aims to ‘decolonise’ the university, arguing that the Cecil Rhodes statue in Oriel College, alongside other monuments to Rhodes, undermine the “inclusive culture” of the university. In Mr Qwabe’s own words, “The focus of our project is dismantling the open glorification of colonial genocide in educational & other public spaces – which makes it easy for British people to believe that these genocides were ‘not that bad’ – and props up the continuing structural legacies of British colonialism, neocolonialism, and ongoing imperialism.” The campaign has made significant breakthrough in recent weeks, as Oriel College agreed to remove a plaque honouring Rhodes and has started a consultation with the university community to consider whether the statue should be removed.

Rhodes House are yet to comment.

Christmas is consumerist. So what?

0

Christmas first became controversial in the 17th century, when Oliver Cromwell and the Puritans banned the whole thing. The festival, deemed ‘unbiblical’ in origin, was banned by the Long Parliament as a wasteful and immoral time. For the Puritans, the festival of ‘Christ-tide’ (best to avoid the Catholic implication of ‘Christ-mass’) as intended by Christ was to be a simple day of fasting and prayer. As one would expect, a lot of ordinary English people did not take kindly to this attempt, and responded with rioting, royalism and presumably aggressive gift-giving.

Controversy over one of the world’s most celebrated festivals remains to this day, though the few Christians who don’t celebrate it – Jehovah’s Witnesses in particular – would make no attempt to ban it. Christmas has evolved far beyond its Christian roots, with celebrators as irreligious as Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris. Along the way, the festival has picked up enough pagan elements to make every Puritan turn in their grave; from trees to yule logs, Christmas today celebrates Christ by appropriating from the belief systems he largely replaced. As the sitcom Community described in 2010, contemporary Christmas is, for many, almost wholly about ‘music, cookies, presents, family and trees.’

Against the backdrop of ever advancing secularisation, Christmas has courted controversy as a conduit for consumerism. The anti-consumerist magazine AdBusters told its readers that should they buy almost nothing over Christmas, they ‘might just experience the most joyous holiday season ever’ even as evangelical Christians preach on the ‘reason for the season.’ Concerns about resource depletion have led environmentalists to open fire at the festival’s ‘wasteful’ nature. Affluent hipsters across the globe are signing up to a ‘Buy Nothing Christmas’ to try to escape the ‘treadmill’ of consumerism.

These objections touch on some valid concerns about society and our planet’s future. Demand for new smartphones and tablets each Christmas is placing enormous strain on rare earth metal stocks in Africa and China, and there are valid criticisms of the ‘instant gratification’ culture of economic materialism that Christmas arguably sustains. In general, however, distaste for the consumerist nature of Christmas has become another thinly veiled attempt to attack capitalist ideals.

The consumerism which surrounds us this time of year is not malicious; from Coca-Cola’s ‘Taste Christmas’ campaign to John Lewis’ ‘Man on the Moon,’ Christmas advertising seeks to liberate the season from its narrow roots and present it as a festival of mutual trust and friendship. These adverts are trying to sell you something, and you mustn’t forget it, but they’re also trying to perpetuate one of humanity’s greatest shared delusions – the idea that the coldest and darkest days of the years can actually be the warmest and brightest.

Strangely, for many of us, this almost nonsensical notion becomes true every single year. Ordinary people are momentarily freed of some of the stresses and pressures of modern life; the almost mythical essence of Christmas allows us to enjoy the simple things in life – companionship, baked goods and free time. For some, consumerism is a distraction from these pleasures. In reality, it is a catalyst. Many without Christian faith or Western origins are caught in the myth of Christmas when they see the first adverts on television; likewise, the desire to give back – for Christmas season is Britain’s peak donations season –arises not from an inner altruism but from a recognition of the mass material wealth consumerism has created.

With the problems of capitalism obvious, from rising inequality to world poverty, it’s easy to forget the pivotal role liberal capitalism has played in making people better off. Since industrialisation, the share of people living in extreme poverty has steadily fallen even as the population of the world increased sevenfold. As recently as 1981, more than 51% of the world population lived in absolute poverty, a figure which is now as low as 14%. Consumerism and consumer culture, as irritating as it might be to some, plays a necessary role in a moral mission which frankly even Oliver Cromwell might have been on-board with.

So as much as the Christians complain and the environmentalists preach, Christmas – a time of consumerism like no other – stands as a remarkable shrine to a socioeconomic system that has transformed this world. It is not a perfect system and there is much to do to ensure it works for the benefit of all, but at Christmas time its strengths and its weaknesses become acutely clear. Weaknesses such as inequality become hugely distressing just as strengths – like historically unfathomable levels of wealth and progress – become things to reflect upon. Whether you love or hate capitalism, and whether you think it is conducive to a better world, there is no denying that Christmas is in many ways a microcosm of capitalism in general.

This is a much derided fact, and it reflects on its critics. Christians hate the consumerisation of Christmas because it runs contrary to biblical statements on wealth; environmentalists may prefer a world unblemished by cities, factories, and technology. Ultimately, however, these critics are targeting the wrong enemy. Taking the consumer out of Christmas will not end capitalism in the world – only the development of a working alternative economic system can do that. Attacks on contemporary Christmas miss the mark, because they target the wrong enemy. Christmas brings people together in an almost exaggerated imitation of how consumerism brings people together; whether you think the flaws of capitalism outweigh this critical benefit or not, it is truly this which makes Christmas the one-of-a-kind festival it is.

You look so Nordic today

0

It was early in Michaelmas when a friend of mine told me that my outfit that particular day “looked so Scandinavian”. I took this as a huge compliment, as I attach a very positive connotation to this expression. Even though Finland, where I come from, is not strictly speaking a part of Scandinavia, but is in fact a Nordic country, I agree that the styles you see in Helsinki often align with those you could encounter in our neighboring Scandinavian countries. After this incident, I wondered if my friend would associate my style with the Nordic look even if she didn’t know I was Finnish.

The distinctive feature of the Nordic style tends to be its minimalism. Colour schemes are quite subtle – and so are prints. Indeed, when you search ‘Scandinavian fashion’, you find outfits with clean lines and earthy colour schemes. However, make no mistake, in Helsinki you can see everything from styles based mainly on tracksuits and sneakers, to high fluting minimalist pieces.

Overall, there is a significant difference between the styles that you see in the streets of Helsinki and Oxford. The Acne-scarf boom that has been persisting for a few winters in Finland is non-existent in the UK, while Marimekko, one of the most popular brands in Finland, is unheard of. Another obvious difference between Finnish and British fashion trends is in shoes. Loafers, and heels on a night out, are definitely more prevalent here in the UK.

One obvious reason for this difference is that many of the brands popular in the Nordic region are rare in the UK. Even some high street brands that you take as a given in Helsinki are almost nonexistent. Similarly, Finland doesn’t have Topshop, or American Apparel (although Sweden does). I also feel like the flea market and vintage culture is more popular in the UK. Perhaps the diversity of choice available to British consumers is the reason I’ve encountered a large variety of styles in Oxford.

The climate also contributes to these differences in looks. In Finland, it’s a struggle every winter to wear what you want when it’s freezing outside. The long winters limit the ways one can dress and create a trade-off between staying warm and dressing up creatively. Wearing heels, for one, becomes gradually more difficult as the winter goes on. To me, the change to the milder climate of Oxford is very enjoyable. On the other hand, I feel like the Brits in Oxford are more Nordic at heart than me, considering the numerous times I’ve observed people walking in t-shirts when I’m freezing in a jacket.

Perhaps my friend could have guessed I was from a Nordic country based on my clothing. I believe that one’s style reflects his or her cultural identity. My status as a Finnish citizen, for example, is reflected in my wearing of Finnish brands, use of subtle colour schemes, and preference for simpler pieces of clothing. I also pay more attention to wearing clothes that keep me warm as it gets colder. It’s a question of judgment whether one considers that Scandinavian or not. For me, wearing or carrying something that has a Finnish nametag reminds me of home. Perhaps dressing up ‘Nordic’ is a subconscious way of curing homesickness.

Have yourself a Dickensian little Christmas

0

’Tis the season in which every single potato, television show, song, soup, jumper, sock, and toilet roll is in its festive edition. There are Christmas cheeses, Christmas green smoothies, and Christmas teacups waved under our noses in every shop we enter on our manic gift-sourcing tour of the town. On the radio, Christmas songs, adverts, games, and greetings dance across the airwaves. Once home, we are bombarded with seasonal episodes of our favourite sitcoms, soaps, and news broadcasts. But, in the midst of this modern, consumerist onslaught, there stands, quietly in its timelessness, the pre-eminent Christmas book; A Christmas Carol.

First published in 1843, Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol is an iconic encapsulation of the very essence of the Christmas spirit. Cantankerous old Ebenezer Scrooge is urged to change his miserly ways and embrace the goodwill and generosity of Christmas by the ghost of his old business partner, Jacob Marley, and the Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, and Yet to Come. Scrooge is encouraged, throughout the novella, to become aware of those less fortunate than himself and of the need for generosity and fellow feeling at Yuletide.

“Irrespective of his poor upbringing, Dickens really loved Christmas,” says Louisa Price, curator of the Charles Dickens Museum in London. In many of his works, Christmas is associated with humbleness, charity, love, warmth, and cheer. In A Christmas Carol, Dickens uses the altruistic nature of the Christmas spirit to draw awareness to the struggles of the working poor and the plight of child labour. In the year of 1843, before he wrote the novella, he visited charities, workhouses, and Ragged Schools across Britain. A Christmas Carol is as much a celebration of the Christmas spirit as it is an encouragement to use the benevolence of this festive spirit to reach out to friends, to family, to foes, to people experiencing poverty, loneliness and hunger.

Instead of turning to the television as the sole source of family entertainment in this bleak midwinter, crack open a copy of A Christmas Carol and travel through time with Scrooge and his Ghosts. “Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol,” says Price, “knowing it would be read aloud.” So, instead of charades – which we can all agree is possibly the most torturous of Christmas traditions – you can read out loud to your Christmas gathering of family and friends, act out Scrooge’s gruff dialogue, and share the humour, poignancy, and enduring relevance of Dickens’ writing.

 —

In the spirit of a true Dickensian Christmas, there are some excellent charities that would welcome donations during the festive period:

Crisis at Christmas offers companionship and support at Christmas to homeless people in the UK www.crisis.org.uk

The Salvation Army works to bring food and companionship to people in need at Christmas www.salvationarmy.org.uk

Age UK helps to combat loneliness and isolation amongst the elderly in the UK www.ageuk.org.uk

Can anyone stump the Trump?

0

It possibly seems like something somewhat resembling an eternity since Texas senator, Ted Cruz first declared his campaign for the US presidency back on March 23rd 2015. However, after the Kentucky and Florida senators, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio quickly – and to be perfectly honest, predictably –  followed suit in launching their campaigns on April 7th 2015 and April 13th 2015 respectively; the fight for the Republican nomination in the 2016 White House race began to take a rather unexpected turn.

This is because, just under a month later on the 4th May; two candidates with absolutely no experience of elected public office (the world-renowned neurosurgeon, Ben Carson and former Hewlett Packard CEO, Carly Fiorina) set out their stalls for the GOP primaries battle. Subsequently, an array of other US governors and senators, current and former began to seemingly queue up in order to throw their hats into the ring to create an absolutely enormous field of 17 major (i.e. regularly featured in notable national opinion polls) 2016 republican presidential candidates. This represented the largest number of contestants for the presidential nomination of a major US party since the Democratic primaries of 1976, which incidentally had only a mere (if that is indeed an appropriate word!) 15 major candidates. Notably, during this campaign announcement period between May and July; the businessman and reality TV star, Donald Trump publically launched what was initially expected to be very much a longshot campaign for the GOP nomination.

At first glance, it is certainly not unheard of to have notable Republican presidential candidates like Carson, Fiorina, and Trump from very unconventional political backgrounds competing in US presidential primaries (Herman Cain’s 2008 campaign and Steve Forbes’ 2000 campaign both spring to mind). On the other hand, it is definitely extremely unusual – in fact, uniquely unusual if one looks at the history of US presidential elections – for three people with no experience of elected US federal office (executive or legislative) to be the apparent polling frontrunners in a major party presidential primary; as was the case on October 18th 2015, when Carson, Fiorina, and Trump took 56% between them (with Trump leading on 28%) in a national Monmouth University opinion poll of a sample of GOP primary voters.

Even as recently as the 21st December 2015, the aggregate opinion polling average of the Huffington Post has shown Donald Trump as having the support of 37.8% of Republican primary voters. Consequently, although Carly Fiorina (since the middle of October 2015) and Ben Carson (since the beginning of December 2015) have both decisively fallen out of fashion amongst potential GOP caucus-goers and primary voters; with just over a month to go until the first caucuses in Iowa on the 1st February, the race for the Republican presidential nomination still has a clear frontrunner from an incredibly unusual (and to the party establishment, unacceptable) political background.

It is fair to say that to the vast majority of independent and moderate Republican voters in the USA, Trump is a very controversial figure. After making inflammatory comments about groups varying from Mexicans through to individual famous female journalists, Donald Trump has most recently and possibly most extensively been ridiculed in the world media for suggesting that there should be an immediate and total shutdown on the admission of Muslims to the USA for the time being for national security purposes.

Resultantly, it comes as very little surprise that the GOP establishment of US Congress members, RNC officials, and major party donors are absolutely terrified at the unpalatable prospect of Trump being their nominee for the presidency. In reality, it seems a foregone conclusion that the presence of such a divisive candidate on the Republican ticket would easily hand victory in the 2016 US presidential election to the Democratic nominee (who is pretty much definitely going to be Hillary Clinton); due to the alienation of large numbers of crucial voters from demographic groups such as Hispanic Americans and women.

However, do establishment Republican leaders have any hope of avoiding the nomination of a candidate who is quite possibly simply ‘un-nominateable’? Well, in short; yes.

If opinion polls are to be believed, it does seem as though other Republican presidential contenders are beginning to gain significant electoral momentum; making Donald Trump appear to be increasingly under threat in the GOP primaries race. Despite the fact that Trump’s level of popular support is seemingly remaining reasonably stable (even in spite of his recent aforementioned comments on Muslims), other more electorally viable presidential candidates (notably the young senators, Marco Rubio and most notably Ted Cruz) are seeing their support amongst Republican voters rise significantly. Ted Cruz especially has built up an extremely well organised grassroots campaign in early-voting states, notably Iowa; in which primary and caucus victories will provide him with much needed momentum to attract undecided GOP primary voters (and indeed party officials and donors looking to endorse someone in the nomination race) who are looking for the candidate most likely to defeat Donald Trump and actually win in the general election fight against the Democratic candidate in November 2016.

Additionally, as the massively extensive field of declared 2016 Republican presidential candidates continues to narrow down from the present 13; it will in all likelihood be the establishment-friendly candidates with either executive or legislative experience who will benefit, not the marmite-akin figures like Donald Trump.

Although candidates like New Jersey governor, Chris Christie and potentially also former Florida governor, Jeb Bush look set to stay in the GOP nomination race beyond the first few primaries and caucuses; others (notably Carson, Fiorina; and the governor of Ohio, John Kasich) are likely to begin suspending their White House campaigns rather rapidly and in quick succession after poor performances in the first few states to vote, creating a large vacuum in nationwide opinion polls that is likely to be predominantly filled by candidates including Cruz and Rubio. Consequently, it does still seem very plausible that despite all of the (justified) global media hype; the current frontrunner may not actually end up being the eventual Republican nominee in the 2016 US presidential election.

However, ‘very plausible’ definitely isn’t synonymic for ‘certain’; and consequently it is definitely not outside the realms of reasonable imagination about the immediate future that Donald Trump will be the 2016 Republican nominee. For this reason, we will all continue to pay very keen attention as we watch this electoral epic continue to unfold. It does seem completely fair and reasonable to say though that the 2016 Republican presidential nominee will be either Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, or Marco Rubio. As the primaries and caucuses begin to take place over the next few months, it will probably become much clearer who the 2016 GOP presidential nominee will be.